正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

260331 • Ao Ruipeng second account Douyin update. “Just learned a new hand dance.” #AoRuipeng #敖瑞鹏

66,499 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ACCRA, GHANA: In August 2024, the Aye (NBM) cult group recorded one of the most painful BKB cases ever recorded on this platform - a case in Accra, Ghana, where a former Aye number 1 man named Summer or Summerboy (seen in the video) was be@ten to de@th by people he considered friends and fellow Ayes. This story revolves around 3 key individuals: Summer, Update, and Asima - all members of Aye. Summer, originally from Imo state, but raised in Ebonyi state, was an Aye number 1 man while in school at Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana, Ebonyi State. Asima (right pic) was his godson (Kson) in Aye. Update is Asima’s younger brother and a childhood friend of Summer. This means Summer was the godfather (LM) to his childhood friend’s elder brother. After Summer graduated and completed his NYSC, he reached out to Update and Asima who lives in Ghana and runs an HK office, seeking to learn how to make money. They agreed and invited Summer to Ghana. When Summer arrived, Asima, Update, and other Ayes in the HK office decided to drill him - a practice just like cult initiation which is meant to toughen up newcomers in the HK. After drilling Summer the first time, they said the drilling was soft and they had to drill him harder the second time. It was during the second drilling that Summer became unc0nscious and was rushed to the hospital, where he d!£d. Summer d!£d on the same day he arrived in Ghana. A godson and a childhood friend, both NBM members, involved in the k**ling of Summer - a friend, a fellow Aye, an Aye godfather, and a former Aye number 1 man. Summer was a very talented musician, and a very peaceful young boy who loved peace and discouraged violence. Summer had supported both Update and Asima in many ways in the past, even supporting them both as a childhood friend and financially, especially when they started a new life in Ghana. Non-cultists (Free Men), there is no true brotherhood in cultism. Reject Aye. Reject Cultism.

Naija Confra

20,349 次观看 • 3 个月前

This week is already so hot. 🔥 Massive release from Decart : Lucy 2.0 a World Editing Model running at 1080p, 30FPS in realtime. This is truly exciting, the era of real-time generative reality is here. We are moving from watching AI video to living inside AI video. A breakthrough model capable of transforming the visual world in real-time. Moving beyond offline rendering, Lucy 2.0 delivers high-fidelity 1080p video generation with near-zero latency. Lucy 2.0 literally "redraws" the entire world pixel-by-pixel, while you are watching it. e.g. If you want to be an anime character, it doesn't just put a mask on you. It turns your skin into anime skin, your hair into anime hair, and the lighting in your room into anime lighting. Lucy 2.0 is also trained to stop the generated video from slowly falling apart over time, so the same stream can run much longer without faces and details drifting. So why is this a "Massive Deal"? Traditional AI video-generation model takes a prompt, you wait 10–20 minutes, and the computer "bakes" a video for you. You couldn't touch it or change it while it was happening. But Lucy 2.0 works like a mirror. It happens in real-time (30 frames per second). There is no waiting. You move your hand, the AI character moves its hand instantly. The craziest part isn't the visuals; it's the physics. Usually, AI hallucinations are glitchy—hands merge into faces, walls melt. Lucy 2.0 understands how the world works without being told. It knows that if you take off a helmet, there is hair underneath. It knows that if you splash water, droplets fly. It learned "physics" just by watching millions of videos. The physical behavior you see emerges from learned visual dynamics, not from engineered geometry or explicit physics engines. Their official technical report explicitly states that the model does not use traditional 3D engines, depth maps, or wireframes. It is a "pure diffusion model."

Rohan Paul

12,761 次观看 • 5 个月前

Context on the issue created by @/ikooo_O and her defamation against Wang Yibo: User @/ikooo_O shared screenshots of alleged chat logs claiming to “confirm” Wang Yibo’s relationship with Qi Meihe, user posted screenshots online claiming that Wang Yibo had private chats with Qi Meihe. The content allegedly included disparaging remarks against more than ten other artists, as well as details such as a ¥14,000 wine purchase. In one of the screenrecords she shared, she accidentally exposed her ID number, confirming that she had stolen Wang Yibo’s abandoned phone number and staged the incident themselves. Evidence of Fabrication: - Xiaohongshu chat records are stored locally and cannot synchronise full-year conversations across devices. The circulated screenshots contradict the platform’s technical mechanism. - The account was bound to a phone number that Wang Yibo had discarded in 2019 due to harassment, making it impossible for it to be used for new conversations in 2025–2026. This “doxxed” phone number was publicly stated by Wang Yibo back in 2019 to have been leaked during a period of harassment by obsessive stalkers, and he had already changed it, YH Ent themselves confirmed with a statement back then of this number changed. - The chats mixed references to a ¥14,000 bottle of wine with a ¥9.90 Pinduoduo walnut order — inconsistent with the spending capacity of a top-tier celebrity. Further discrepancies: 1️⃣: The person who fabricated the material posted a login video, and the screen recording exposed that the account actually belonged to her, name 李思谨, born in 2006. Wang Yibo’s company has already collected evidence and filed a lawsuit. 2️⃣: [Not a single photo or voice message in six months of chats] A “couple” supposedly in frequent contact for over half a year never sent a single selfie or voice note? It’s all plain text that’s impossible to verify and also very not align with Wang Yibo’s texting style as shown by screenshots shared by others in the industry. 3️⃣: [The “couple’s” chats consist entirely of forwarding gossip accounts insulting celebrities] Six months of conversation made up entirely of forwarding posts from marketing/gossip accounts criticising celebrities. Not a single line like “What are we eating tomorrow?” or “Do we need anything at home?” or other everyday things. In addition: Other accounts of the perpetrator have been found, such as a Weibo and Douyin account. The persona this anti assigned herself was that of a so-called “dream-girl fan turned anti,” but in reality her Douyin fan account, “我要梨四斤,” had previously engaged in sasaeng-style behaviour toward multiple celebrities, just not Wang Yibo (view videos attached). This person is said to have a history of unstable behaviour. The celebrities she allegedly harassed reportedly called the police on her several times, and she was once taken away by officers after being caught lingering around a car in a garage. Privately, she has also spoken negatively about many celebrities, including Wang Yibo. What can be concluded: This was the act of an unhinged sasaeng/anti who fabricated a whole drama to drag Wang Yibo just because of her blindsided, irrational hate. #WangYibo

ecah

27,529 次观看 • 4 个月前

I just built a Meta Ads diagnostic in Claude Code that tells you WHY your account broke, not just what changed 🤯 It spins up a team of agents that each investigate a different reason performance dropped, then argue against each other to kill the wrong answer before it ever reaches you. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who panic-kill creative the second CPA spikes. If you've watched ROAS fall off a cliff and opened Ads Manager with ten tabs going, you already know what happens next. Your gut says "creative fatigue." You kill your best-performing ad. A week later performance is still broken, because that was never the problem. Guessing wrong is the most expensive move in paid social. This workflow ends the guessing: → One agent investigates each competing theory — creative fatigue, budget and delivery changes, traffic quality, offer and seasonality → Each one is blind to the others, reasoning only from its own slice of the data so they can't bias each other → A refuter agent then attacks every surviving theory and tries to kill it → A theory only stands if the data can't disprove it → You get a ranked diagnosis: the real cause, the evidence for and against it, and the one move to make this week No anchoring on the first obvious answer. No killing winning creative on a hunch. No "here's what happened" reports that never tell you why. What you get: → Every theory tested in parallel instead of one biased guess → An adversarial pass that kills the wrong answer before you act on it → A ranked diagnosis with confidence levels and evidence both ways → A reusable workflow you drop next month's export into and re-run Built 100% in Claude Code with the new dynamic workflows. The first account I ran it on looked like textbook creative fatigue. The workflow disagreed, and traced the real cause to a budget change that had doubled spend and flooded delivery with junk traffic. I put together a full playbook with the exact workflow, the prompt, and how to run it on your own account. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "META" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

12,670 次观看 • 1 个月前

This guy built a visual scanner that reads 468 points on his face and 42 points on his hands from a regular webcam and turns them into a cloud of thousands of particles right between his palms. Inside, MediaPipe and TouchDesigner are linked: the first captures hands and face from the webcam with high accuracy, the second turns those coordinates into a live plane and feeds it into a POP system that instantly generates a swarm of particles in the shape of a head. No studio, no render farmer, no VR headset. Just a laptop, a webcam, and 1 TouchDesigner session. And traditional VJ studios keep teams of 5 people on a setup with lighting, custom hardware, and commercial plugins, while his expenses are only a TouchDesigner subscription and a regular USB camera. One laptop runs MediaPipe and TouchDesigner simultaneously, holds the camera stream at 60 FPS without drops, and in parallel processes 468 face points + 21 points on each hand. The camera captures frame after frame, MediaPipe in real time sends TouchDesigner the finger coordinates and face geometry, and the POP operator inside the engine translates those numbers into thousands of particle points with colors from bright pink to gold. This setup immediately defines the role of the tool and the limits of its autonomy. It knows where the fingertips are at every moment of the frame. It knows how to read the face geometry at any angle to the camera. It knows how to draw a swarm of particles between them with the right color and contour. → MediaPipe pulls 468 points from the face and 21 points from each hand, 60 times per second → TouchDesigner receives those coordinates, builds a virtual rectangle between the fingertips, and feeds it into the POP system → POP generates thousands of particle points in the shape of a head, coloring them in a gradient from bright pink to gold → The HUD layer adds green corners and a blue neon frame, styling the image like an AR interface → All layers assemble into 1 real-time frame that projects back onto the video in the camera window → The final image is recorded to a file or broadcast to a projector for a live installation And only when the guy spreads his hands wider does the plane between the palms stretch; brings them together, it narrows. Otherwise the system runs on its own. And when he moves from his home room to a concert hall, the same laptop with the same webcam launches the same TouchDesigner session in just 5 minutes, without reconfiguration, without a new team, and without a single line of new code. In his work setup there is no studio of his own and no team for assembly. On the desk sits a laptop with a webcam, on top run MediaPipe and TouchDesigner with POP operators, and the same setup through a USB camera moves to any concert without a new configuration. Out of everything I have seen this year, this is the cleanest Creative Coding setup on 1 laptop: 0 render farms, 0 studio lighting, and between them 3 libraries, thousands of particle points, and 1 webcam.

Blaze

38,242 次观看 • 2 个月前