Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

3A-Region 2 Final: Final Score Berkeley Prep 51 Gateway Charter 48 📊Leaders Berkeley Prep Boys Basketball Matt Able 23 Donnie Morris 12 GatewayCharterSchool Gabe Timmons 16 Myles Jones 12 Pat Johnson 11

thehoopvibe's profile picture

ᴊᴀᴋᴇ ᴘᴇʀᴘᴇʀ

17,702 subscribers

10,623 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Class 3A-Region 2 Semifinal Final Score: King’s 66 Bell Creek 64 The last 15 seconds of this game was flat out bonkers. 📊Leaders The King’s Academy Athletic Dept. Javian Jones 22 Jermaine Council 17 @BCABoysBball Neil Falconer 18 Jermal Jones 16 Caleb Sanders 14 Ben Walker 12
0:26

Class 3A-Region 2 Semifinal Final Score: King’s 66 Bell Creek 64 The last 15 seconds of this game was flat out bonkers. 📊Leaders The King’s Academy Athletic Dept. Javian Jones 22 Jermaine Council 17 @BCABoysBball Neil Falconer 18 Jermal Jones 16 Caleb Sanders 14 Ben Walker 12

ᴊᴀᴋᴇ ᴘᴇʀᴘᴇʀ

14,923 views • 3 years ago

260211 real__pcy full instagram live with english subs 🍒 #CHANYEOL #찬열 ㅡ playlist 1. flatline 9:51 2. crown 10:36 3. crazy 11: 28 4. moonlight shadows 12:18 5. zuruiyo [original version] 15:33 6. zuruiyo [final version] 16:32 7. back pocket 17:42 8. cherry 18:16 9. tokyo tower 19:23 10 UP TO YOU 20:59 11. i'm on your side too 23:21 12. unreleased song 24:11 13. black out 25:28 14. lemon (kenshi yonezu) 26:57 15. shinunoga e-wa (fujii kaze) 28:03 16. raining in manila (lola amour) 29:03 17. see tihn (hoang thuy linh) 30:53 18. i like you the most (ponchet) 32:16 19. bye bye my blue (baek yerin) 35:55 20. LADY (kenshi yonezu) 36:36 21. iris out (kenshi yonezu) 38:47 22. high & dry 42:20 23. ghost town (benson boone) 44:25 24. back & forth 45:41 25. alright alright (suho ft chanyeol) 46:28 26. koikaze ni nosete (vaundy) 47:17 27. walk on memories 48:41 28. butterfly (digimon OST) 50:02 29. ocean drive 51:28 30. mourning (post malone) 53:06
56:04

260211 real__pcy full instagram live with english subs 🍒 #CHANYEOL #찬열 ㅡ playlist 1. flatline 9:51 2. crown 10:36 3. crazy 11: 28 4. moonlight shadows 12:18 5. zuruiyo [original version] 15:33 6. zuruiyo [final version] 16:32 7. back pocket 17:42 8. cherry 18:16 9. tokyo tower 19:23 10 UP TO YOU 20:59 11. i'm on your side too 23:21 12. unreleased song 24:11 13. black out 25:28 14. lemon (kenshi yonezu) 26:57 15. shinunoga e-wa (fujii kaze) 28:03 16. raining in manila (lola amour) 29:03 17. see tihn (hoang thuy linh) 30:53 18. i like you the most (ponchet) 32:16 19. bye bye my blue (baek yerin) 35:55 20. LADY (kenshi yonezu) 36:36 21. iris out (kenshi yonezu) 38:47 22. high & dry 42:20 23. ghost town (benson boone) 44:25 24. back & forth 45:41 25. alright alright (suho ft chanyeol) 46:28 26. koikaze ni nosete (vaundy) 47:17 27. walk on memories 48:41 28. butterfly (digimon OST) 50:02 29. ocean drive 51:28 30. mourning (post malone) 53:06

NLNL 🍒🔥

99,360 views • 6 months ago

Ranking Every Ad Creative Format From Worst to Best: Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:34 - Content Ads 2:28 - Static Images 3:39 - Static Reels 5:15 - VSLs As Ads 6:23 - Podcasts As Ads 7:32 - Talking Head 9:54 - UGC 10:51 - AI Generated Creatives 11:48 - Carousels 12:31 - Green Screen Organic 13:31 - Meme Ads 14:15 - Testimonial Ads 15:11 - Retargeting Ads 16:14 - Final Rankings Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. No income is guaranteed. Million-dollar months are not typical and should not be expected. We don't promise results. Always do your own due diligence.
18:22

Ranking Every Ad Creative Format From Worst to Best: Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:34 - Content Ads 2:28 - Static Images 3:39 - Static Reels 5:15 - VSLs As Ads 6:23 - Podcasts As Ads 7:32 - Talking Head 9:54 - UGC 10:51 - AI Generated Creatives 11:48 - Carousels 12:31 - Green Screen Organic 13:31 - Meme Ads 14:15 - Testimonial Ads 15:11 - Retargeting Ads 16:14 - Final Rankings Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only. No income is guaranteed. Million-dollar months are not typical and should not be expected. We don't promise results. Always do your own due diligence.

Jeremy Haynes

11,112 views • 7 hours ago

Learn 99% of ChatGPT Work in 61 minutes: GPT Work is like Codex in the cloud. It works on phone, web, and desktop. And I've been using it to run my business. These are the 14 knowledge work capabilities. 00:00 Intro 03:18 #1 Presentations 09:16 #2 Plugins 17:36 #3 Blocks 23:34 #4 Websites & Apps & Hosting 30:09 #6 Branching Chats 31:51 #7 Desktop App (Cloud vs Local) 37:01 #8 Voice Mode 41:36 #9 Remote Voice Mode 45:52 #10 In-App Browser 48:50 #11 Skills 51:45 #12 Scheduled Automations 54:37 #13 Spreadsheets 56:58 #14 Multi-Agent Workspace 59:19 Final Review
1:01:01

Learn 99% of ChatGPT Work in 61 minutes: GPT Work is like Codex in the cloud. It works on phone, web, and desktop. And I've been using it to run my business. These are the 14 knowledge work capabilities. 00:00 Intro 03:18 #1 Presentations 09:16 #2 Plugins 17:36 #3 Blocks 23:34 #4 Websites & Apps & Hosting 30:09 #6 Branching Chats 31:51 #7 Desktop App (Cloud vs Local) 37:01 #8 Voice Mode 41:36 #9 Remote Voice Mode 45:52 #10 In-App Browser 48:50 #11 Skills 51:45 #12 Scheduled Automations 54:37 #13 Spreadsheets 56:58 #14 Multi-Agent Workspace 59:19 Final Review

Riley Brown

862,410 views • 19 days ago

No one: *insert lack of people here*: Me: Here's over four hours of CART 1996-02 onboard footage with timestamps if you want to find a driver that you like #INDYCAR Timestamps (Driver, Year, Track) 0:00 JPM '99 Long Beach 1:00 Andretti '97 Portland 1:43 Takagi '02 Motegi 2:08 JPM '00 Denver 2:57 Fernandez '99 Fontana 3:57 Gordon '96 Toronto 4:53 Andretti '98 Rio de Janeiro 6:41 Brack '02 Toronto 7:37 de Ferran '97 Fontana 8:59 da Matta '02 Monterrey 12:13 Gugelmin '01 Texas 12:40 Papis '00 Toronto 13:40 Bruno '01 Nazareth 14:10 de Ferran '96 Cleveland 15:06 Vasser '00 Michigan 15:37 Fernandez '98 Toronto 16:47 Dixon '01 Rockingham 17:29 Johansson '96 Vancouver 18:05 Tracy '02 Chicago 19:11 Rahal '96 Long Beach 19:59 Servia '02 Rockingham 20:43 Vasser '96 Toronto 22:16 Andretti '97 Fontana 23:08 Bruno '02 Denver 25:43 Pruett '98 Michigan 26:16 JPM '00 Road America 26:54 de Ferran '97 Gateway 27:26 Brack '02 Laguna Seca 29:33 Andretti '96 Milwaukee 31:33 Zanardi '98 Toronto 33:01 Papis '02 Fontana 33:53 Bruno '01 Toronto 35:15 Fittipaldi '96 Portland 36:12 Servia '02 Rockingham 36:40 Zanardi '98 Toronto 37:49 Andretti '96 Rio de Janeiro 38:34 Tracy '02 Vancouver 40:32 JPM '99 Homestead 41:11 Papis '01 Long Beach 41:39 Franchitti '02 Rockingham 42:11 Zanardi '98 Toronto 44:30 Gugelmin '01 Monterrey 45:10 Hearn '99 Milwaukee 46:15 Andretti '02 Monterrey 48:56 Brack '01 Chicago 49:26 da Matta '02 Road America 51:21 Pruett '98 Gateway 51:53 Tags '02 Toronto 52:34 Vasser '98 Motegi 53:06 Papis '02 Mid-Ohio 53:41 Hearn '98 Nazareth 54:18 da Matta '02 Monterrey 55:24 Vasser '00 Nazareth 56:25 Franchitti '02 Mexico City 57:40 Zanardi '98 Michigan 58:06 Franchitti '02 Portland 1:00:46 Vasser '00 Rio de Janeiro 1:01:34 Fittipaldi '98 Vancouver 1:02:42 Vasser '99 Nazareth 1:03:42 de Ferran '98 Denver 1:04:36 Fittipaldi '96 Mid-Ohio 1:05:29 Dixon '01 Vancouver 1:06:26 Rahal '98 Laguna Seca 1:08:10 Brack '02 Vancouver 1:09:16 Pruett '97 Rio de Janeiro 1:09:55 Rahal '98 Surfers Paradise 1:11:13 Minassian '01 Texas 1:12:48 Franchitti '02 Monterrey 1:14:27 Kanaan '99 Surfers Paradise 1:15:09 Vasser '96 Homestead 1:16:01 Franchitti '02 Mid-Ohio 1:17:16 Papis '00 Cleveland 1:18:18 Bruno '02 Road America 1:20:32 Andretti '99 Homestead 1:20:54 Bruno '01 Vancouver 1:22:07 Andretti '99 Motegi 1:23:11 JPM '00 Vancouver 1:23:41 Tracy '02 Laguna Seca 1:25:22 Minassian '01 Denver 1:26:23 Andretti '99 Gateway 1:26:49 Bruno '02 Denver 1:28:46 Andretti '99 Road America 1:30:04 Dixon '01 Surfers Paradise 1:30:37 Franchitti '02 Portland 1:32:48 Vasser '96 Vancouver 1:33:24 Andretti '98 Nazareth 1:34:00 Tracy '02 Toronto 1:34:56 JPM '99 Portland 1:36:45 Rahal '97 Homestead 1:37:24 Carpentier '02 Road America 1:39:02 da Matta '00 Nazareth 1:40:14 Zanardi '98 Toronto 1:40:59 Johansson '96 Portland 1:41:54 Brack '02 Long Beach 1:42:33 Boesel '97 Laguna Seca 1:43:28 Andretti '99 Homestead 1:44:26 Rahal '98 Denver 1:45:57 Johnstone '96 Portland 1:46:55 JPM '00 Chicago 1:47:35 da Matta '02 Laguna Seca 1:49:36 Brack '01 Chicago 1:50:44 Carpentier '02 Montreal 1:52:25 Gidley '01 Rockingham 1:53:01 Vasser '02 Mid-Ohio 1:54:23 Dixon '01 Houston 1:55:12 JPM '99 Milwaukee 1:56:15 Gugelmin '01 Mid-Ohio 1:57:13 Tracy '02 Miami 1:59:02 Pruett '98 Fontana 1:59:37 Andretti '99 Portland 2:00:32 Papis '00 Michigan 2:01:23 Andretti '96 Laguna Seca 2:03:21 Fernandez '99 Surfers Paradise 2:04:23 Brack '02 Fontana 2:05:24 Papis '00 Cleveland 2:06:08 da Matta '02 Laguna Seca 2:10:12 Ribiero '97 Michigan 2:10:59 Brack '02 Vancouver 2:12:26 Fernandez '99 Laguna Seca 2:13:49 Rahal '97 Fontana 2:14:27 Gidley '01 Road America 2:15:14 Fernandez '02 Milwaukee 2:16:26 Zanardi '98 Vancouver 2:17:54 Fittipaldi '97 Laguna Seca 2:18:58 Bell '02 Motegi 2:19:39 JPM '00 Laguna Seca 2:20:32 Pruett '98 Gateway 2:21:07 Franchitti '02 Toronto 2:23:08 JPM '99 Portland 2:24:08 Dixon '01 Lausitz 2:24:44 Vasser '02 Denver 2:25:55 Fernandez '01 Motegi 2:27:19 Tracy '02 Mexico City 2:28:20 Fittipaldi '99 Gateway 2:29:38 Carpentier '02 Mid-Ohio 2:30:13 Andretti '97 Surfers Paradise 2:31:40 Vasser '96 Nazareth 2:32:05 de Ferran '97 Long Beach 2:33:13 Vasser '99 Homestead 2:33:39 Kanaan '02 Cleveland 2:34:30 Fernandez '01 Chicago 2:35:58 Brack '02 Laguna Seca 2:37:21 Fernandez '01 Texas 2:37:49 JPM '99 Denver 2:38:44 de Ferran '97 Rio de Janeiro 2:39:28 Hearn '98 Road America 2:44:50 Brack '02 Vancouver 2:44:02 Andretti '98 Homestead 2:45:00 Tracy '02 Laguna Seca 2:46:16 Gidley '01 Chicago 2:47:12 Fittipaldi '96 Cleveland 2:48:18 JPM '00 Portland 2:49:57 Rahal '98 Motegi 2:50:28 Blundell '00 Long Beach 2:51:39 Franchitti '02 Rockingham 2:52:03 Andretti '99 Mid-Ohio 2:53:25 Tracy '02 Vancouver 2:54:33 Gugelmin '01 Portland 2:55:41 JPM '00 Denver 2:56:44 Franchitti '02 Motegi 2:57:25 Zanardi '98 Toronto 2:59:41 Franchitti '02 Rockingham 3:00:17 JPM '00 Laguna Seca 3:01:35 Tracy '02 Toronto 3:04:18 Brack '01 Michigan 3:04:51 da Matta '02 Monterrey 3:06:04 Jones '99 Rio de Janeiro 3:06:57 JPM '00 Houston 3:07:33 Fernandez '02 Monterrey 3:09:02 Bruno '01 Nazareth 3:10:20 Rahal '96 Toronto 3:11:23 da Matta '02 Road America 3:13:42 Pruett '96 Nazareth 3:14:40 JPM '00 Road America 3:15:23 Fittipaldi '99 Cleveland 3:16:31 Hearn '98 Rio de Janeiro 3:17:58 Andretti '02 Road America 3:18:54 Vasser '96 Milwaukee 3:19:37 Franchitti '02 Portland 3:20:34 Andretti '97 Toronto 3:21:26 Vasser '99 Milwaukee 3:22:06 Papis '00 Vancouver 3:22:48 Bruno '01 Laguna Seca 3:24:10 Rahal '97 Rio de Janeiro 3:25:22 Brack '02 Denver 3:26:15 Gordon '99 Chicago 3:27:03 Fittipaldi '96 Portland 3:27:41 Nakano '01 Motegi 3:28:34 Vasser '02 Denver 3:29:46 Andretti '99 Milwaukee 3:30:27 Pruett '98 Mid-Ohio 3:31:23 Papis '00 Milwaukee 3:31:55 Andretti '99 Denver 3:33:01 Bruno '01 Nazareth 3:33:34 Carpentier '02 Montreal 3:35:11 Andretti '99 Nazareth 3:36:01 JPM '00 Mid-Ohio 3:37:05 Rahal '98 Rio de Janeiro 3:37:48 Kanaan '02 Cleveland 3:39:01 Vasser '00 Motegi 3:40:10 Fittipaldi '02 Montreal 3:41:20 da Matta '00 Michigan 3:41:55 Zanardi '98 Toronto 3:42:57 Papis '00 Milwaukee 3:43:53 Bruno '02 Portland 3:44:48 da Matta '01 Fontana 3:45:42 Zanardi '98 Portland 3:46:42 Andretti '99 Nazareth 3:47:44 Carpentier '02 Mid-Ohio 3:48:55 Andretti '99 Fontana 3:49:42 Vasser '01 Houston 3:50:34 Rahal '98 Fontana 3:51:57 JPM '00 Portland 3:53:15 Andretti '99 Cleveland 3:54:30 Vasser '97 Homestead 3:55:30 Andretti '99 Cleveland 3:56:32 Servia '02 Rockingham 3:56:59 Fernandez '01 Surfers Paradise 3:58:27 Tracy '02 Fontana 3:59:08 JPM '99 Denver 4:00:16 Papis '00 Homestead 4:00:44 Franchitti '02 Laguna Seca 4:02:39 Bruno '01 Milwaukee 4:03:25 Carpentier '02 Vancouver 4:04:34 JPM '99 Milwaukee 4:05:04 Kanaan '02 Cleveland 4:05:55 Jones '99 Gateway 4:06:30 da Matta '02 Laguna Seca 4:07:38 Vasser '99 Motegi 4:08:13 Fontana '00 Long Beach 4:09:49 Bruno '01 Milwaukee 4:10:54 Carpentier '02 Cleveland 4:11:59 Andretti '99 Gateway 4:12:51 Franchitti '02 Road America 4:14:29 Zanardi '98 Toronto 4:15:51 da Matta '02 Fontana 4:16:51 Ribiero '97 Toronto 4:19:16 Nakano '00 Laguna Seca 4:20:12 Gidley '01 Fontana 4:20:42 Kanaan '99 Mid-Ohio 4:21:48 da Matta '01 Fontana 4:22:33 Andretti '02 Monterrey 4:24:22 Pruett '96 Toronto 4:26:40 Vasser '99 Michigan
4:27:33

No one: *insert lack of people here*: Me: Here's over four hours of CART 1996-02 onboard footage with timestamps if you want to find a driver that you like #INDYCAR Timestamps (Driver, Year, Track) 0:00 JPM '99 Long Beach 1:00 Andretti '97 Portland 1:43 Takagi '02 Motegi 2:08 JPM '00 Denver 2:57 Fernandez '99 Fontana 3:57 Gordon '96 Toronto 4:53 Andretti '98 Rio de Janeiro 6:41 Brack '02 Toronto 7:37 de Ferran '97 Fontana 8:59 da Matta '02 Monterrey 12:13 Gugelmin '01 Texas 12:40 Papis '00 Toronto 13:40 Bruno '01 Nazareth 14:10 de Ferran '96 Cleveland 15:06 Vasser '00 Michigan 15:37 Fernandez '98 Toronto 16:47 Dixon '01 Rockingham 17:29 Johansson '96 Vancouver 18:05 Tracy '02 Chicago 19:11 Rahal '96 Long Beach 19:59 Servia '02 Rockingham 20:43 Vasser '96 Toronto 22:16 Andretti '97 Fontana 23:08 Bruno '02 Denver 25:43 Pruett '98 Michigan 26:16 JPM '00 Road America 26:54 de Ferran '97 Gateway 27:26 Brack '02 Laguna Seca 29:33 Andretti '96 Milwaukee 31:33 Zanardi '98 Toronto 33:01 Papis '02 Fontana 33:53 Bruno '01 Toronto 35:15 Fittipaldi '96 Portland 36:12 Servia '02 Rockingham 36:40 Zanardi '98 Toronto 37:49 Andretti '96 Rio de Janeiro 38:34 Tracy '02 Vancouver 40:32 JPM '99 Homestead 41:11 Papis '01 Long Beach 41:39 Franchitti '02 Rockingham 42:11 Zanardi '98 Toronto 44:30 Gugelmin '01 Monterrey 45:10 Hearn '99 Milwaukee 46:15 Andretti '02 Monterrey 48:56 Brack '01 Chicago 49:26 da Matta '02 Road America 51:21 Pruett '98 Gateway 51:53 Tags '02 Toronto 52:34 Vasser '98 Motegi 53:06 Papis '02 Mid-Ohio 53:41 Hearn '98 Nazareth 54:18 da Matta '02 Monterrey 55:24 Vasser '00 Nazareth 56:25 Franchitti '02 Mexico City 57:40 Zanardi '98 Michigan 58:06 Franchitti '02 Portland 1:00:46 Vasser '00 Rio de Janeiro 1:01:34 Fittipaldi '98 Vancouver 1:02:42 Vasser '99 Nazareth 1:03:42 de Ferran '98 Denver 1:04:36 Fittipaldi '96 Mid-Ohio 1:05:29 Dixon '01 Vancouver 1:06:26 Rahal '98 Laguna Seca 1:08:10 Brack '02 Vancouver 1:09:16 Pruett '97 Rio de Janeiro 1:09:55 Rahal '98 Surfers Paradise 1:11:13 Minassian '01 Texas 1:12:48 Franchitti '02 Monterrey 1:14:27 Kanaan '99 Surfers Paradise 1:15:09 Vasser '96 Homestead 1:16:01 Franchitti '02 Mid-Ohio 1:17:16 Papis '00 Cleveland 1:18:18 Bruno '02 Road America 1:20:32 Andretti '99 Homestead 1:20:54 Bruno '01 Vancouver 1:22:07 Andretti '99 Motegi 1:23:11 JPM '00 Vancouver 1:23:41 Tracy '02 Laguna Seca 1:25:22 Minassian '01 Denver 1:26:23 Andretti '99 Gateway 1:26:49 Bruno '02 Denver 1:28:46 Andretti '99 Road America 1:30:04 Dixon '01 Surfers Paradise 1:30:37 Franchitti '02 Portland 1:32:48 Vasser '96 Vancouver 1:33:24 Andretti '98 Nazareth 1:34:00 Tracy '02 Toronto 1:34:56 JPM '99 Portland 1:36:45 Rahal '97 Homestead 1:37:24 Carpentier '02 Road America 1:39:02 da Matta '00 Nazareth 1:40:14 Zanardi '98 Toronto 1:40:59 Johansson '96 Portland 1:41:54 Brack '02 Long Beach 1:42:33 Boesel '97 Laguna Seca 1:43:28 Andretti '99 Homestead 1:44:26 Rahal '98 Denver 1:45:57 Johnstone '96 Portland 1:46:55 JPM '00 Chicago 1:47:35 da Matta '02 Laguna Seca 1:49:36 Brack '01 Chicago 1:50:44 Carpentier '02 Montreal 1:52:25 Gidley '01 Rockingham 1:53:01 Vasser '02 Mid-Ohio 1:54:23 Dixon '01 Houston 1:55:12 JPM '99 Milwaukee 1:56:15 Gugelmin '01 Mid-Ohio 1:57:13 Tracy '02 Miami 1:59:02 Pruett '98 Fontana 1:59:37 Andretti '99 Portland 2:00:32 Papis '00 Michigan 2:01:23 Andretti '96 Laguna Seca 2:03:21 Fernandez '99 Surfers Paradise 2:04:23 Brack '02 Fontana 2:05:24 Papis '00 Cleveland 2:06:08 da Matta '02 Laguna Seca 2:10:12 Ribiero '97 Michigan 2:10:59 Brack '02 Vancouver 2:12:26 Fernandez '99 Laguna Seca 2:13:49 Rahal '97 Fontana 2:14:27 Gidley '01 Road America 2:15:14 Fernandez '02 Milwaukee 2:16:26 Zanardi '98 Vancouver 2:17:54 Fittipaldi '97 Laguna Seca 2:18:58 Bell '02 Motegi 2:19:39 JPM '00 Laguna Seca 2:20:32 Pruett '98 Gateway 2:21:07 Franchitti '02 Toronto 2:23:08 JPM '99 Portland 2:24:08 Dixon '01 Lausitz 2:24:44 Vasser '02 Denver 2:25:55 Fernandez '01 Motegi 2:27:19 Tracy '02 Mexico City 2:28:20 Fittipaldi '99 Gateway 2:29:38 Carpentier '02 Mid-Ohio 2:30:13 Andretti '97 Surfers Paradise 2:31:40 Vasser '96 Nazareth 2:32:05 de Ferran '97 Long Beach 2:33:13 Vasser '99 Homestead 2:33:39 Kanaan '02 Cleveland 2:34:30 Fernandez '01 Chicago 2:35:58 Brack '02 Laguna Seca 2:37:21 Fernandez '01 Texas 2:37:49 JPM '99 Denver 2:38:44 de Ferran '97 Rio de Janeiro 2:39:28 Hearn '98 Road America 2:44:50 Brack '02 Vancouver 2:44:02 Andretti '98 Homestead 2:45:00 Tracy '02 Laguna Seca 2:46:16 Gidley '01 Chicago 2:47:12 Fittipaldi '96 Cleveland 2:48:18 JPM '00 Portland 2:49:57 Rahal '98 Motegi 2:50:28 Blundell '00 Long Beach 2:51:39 Franchitti '02 Rockingham 2:52:03 Andretti '99 Mid-Ohio 2:53:25 Tracy '02 Vancouver 2:54:33 Gugelmin '01 Portland 2:55:41 JPM '00 Denver 2:56:44 Franchitti '02 Motegi 2:57:25 Zanardi '98 Toronto 2:59:41 Franchitti '02 Rockingham 3:00:17 JPM '00 Laguna Seca 3:01:35 Tracy '02 Toronto 3:04:18 Brack '01 Michigan 3:04:51 da Matta '02 Monterrey 3:06:04 Jones '99 Rio de Janeiro 3:06:57 JPM '00 Houston 3:07:33 Fernandez '02 Monterrey 3:09:02 Bruno '01 Nazareth 3:10:20 Rahal '96 Toronto 3:11:23 da Matta '02 Road America 3:13:42 Pruett '96 Nazareth 3:14:40 JPM '00 Road America 3:15:23 Fittipaldi '99 Cleveland 3:16:31 Hearn '98 Rio de Janeiro 3:17:58 Andretti '02 Road America 3:18:54 Vasser '96 Milwaukee 3:19:37 Franchitti '02 Portland 3:20:34 Andretti '97 Toronto 3:21:26 Vasser '99 Milwaukee 3:22:06 Papis '00 Vancouver 3:22:48 Bruno '01 Laguna Seca 3:24:10 Rahal '97 Rio de Janeiro 3:25:22 Brack '02 Denver 3:26:15 Gordon '99 Chicago 3:27:03 Fittipaldi '96 Portland 3:27:41 Nakano '01 Motegi 3:28:34 Vasser '02 Denver 3:29:46 Andretti '99 Milwaukee 3:30:27 Pruett '98 Mid-Ohio 3:31:23 Papis '00 Milwaukee 3:31:55 Andretti '99 Denver 3:33:01 Bruno '01 Nazareth 3:33:34 Carpentier '02 Montreal 3:35:11 Andretti '99 Nazareth 3:36:01 JPM '00 Mid-Ohio 3:37:05 Rahal '98 Rio de Janeiro 3:37:48 Kanaan '02 Cleveland 3:39:01 Vasser '00 Motegi 3:40:10 Fittipaldi '02 Montreal 3:41:20 da Matta '00 Michigan 3:41:55 Zanardi '98 Toronto 3:42:57 Papis '00 Milwaukee 3:43:53 Bruno '02 Portland 3:44:48 da Matta '01 Fontana 3:45:42 Zanardi '98 Portland 3:46:42 Andretti '99 Nazareth 3:47:44 Carpentier '02 Mid-Ohio 3:48:55 Andretti '99 Fontana 3:49:42 Vasser '01 Houston 3:50:34 Rahal '98 Fontana 3:51:57 JPM '00 Portland 3:53:15 Andretti '99 Cleveland 3:54:30 Vasser '97 Homestead 3:55:30 Andretti '99 Cleveland 3:56:32 Servia '02 Rockingham 3:56:59 Fernandez '01 Surfers Paradise 3:58:27 Tracy '02 Fontana 3:59:08 JPM '99 Denver 4:00:16 Papis '00 Homestead 4:00:44 Franchitti '02 Laguna Seca 4:02:39 Bruno '01 Milwaukee 4:03:25 Carpentier '02 Vancouver 4:04:34 JPM '99 Milwaukee 4:05:04 Kanaan '02 Cleveland 4:05:55 Jones '99 Gateway 4:06:30 da Matta '02 Laguna Seca 4:07:38 Vasser '99 Motegi 4:08:13 Fontana '00 Long Beach 4:09:49 Bruno '01 Milwaukee 4:10:54 Carpentier '02 Cleveland 4:11:59 Andretti '99 Gateway 4:12:51 Franchitti '02 Road America 4:14:29 Zanardi '98 Toronto 4:15:51 da Matta '02 Fontana 4:16:51 Ribiero '97 Toronto 4:19:16 Nakano '00 Laguna Seca 4:20:12 Gidley '01 Fontana 4:20:42 Kanaan '99 Mid-Ohio 4:21:48 da Matta '01 Fontana 4:22:33 Andretti '02 Monterrey 4:24:22 Pruett '96 Toronto 4:26:40 Vasser '99 Michigan

Hickey

13,306 views • 1 year ago

🕵🏻‍♀️ UPSC AIR 1 Dr. Anuj Agnihotri's Full Study Plan & Booklist for Prelims & Mains with Dr. Mrunal Patel Timestamps 0:00 Highlights 1:47 Intro: Anuj Agnihotri AIR 1 2:02 History: Prelims & Mains 2:23 TN NCERT & IGNOU Strategy 2:52 Geography: NCERT Approach 3:12 Role of Unacademy Educators 3:52 NCERT Revision Tips 4:01 Geo Mains: Disasters & Current 4:34 Env & Ecology Intro 4:43 Env Laws & National Parks 5:12 Wikipedia Search Strategy 5:33 Economy: Why Fundamentals First 5:51 Mrunal Sir’s Economy Videos 5:56 Economy CA: Indian Express 6:13 Polity: Laxmikanth for Prelims 6:22 GS2 Governance Themes 6:42 Social Issues: Clubbing Method 7:21 The Hindu vs Indian Express 7:26 5 Years of Indian Express 7:48 Why skip CA Magazines? 7:59 Science & Tech Prep 8:36 PYQ Analysis & Filtering 8:56 Core Subjects Recap 9:00 Newspaper First Strategy 9:20 Static & Current Linkages 9:32 Reading Time & Note-making 9:44 Value Addition to Notes 10:03 Avoiding CA Compilations 10:24 Ethics: Keyword Approach 10:51 Definitions & Examples 10:58 Real Life & Mythic Examples 11:07 Ethics Case Study Mindset 11:32 Essay: Templates & Conclusion 12:25 Optional Subject Choice 12:29 Medical Science Optional 13:06 Med Science Resources 13:35 Revision Challenges 14:16 Data: Med Science Toppers 14:46 AIR 1: Honest Reflection 15:23 Message to Aspirants 15:55 Mock Tests & Mindset 16:07 Closing Remarks In this exclusive session, Dr. Mrunal Patel interviews Dr. Anuj Agnihotri (AIR 1, UPSC CSE 2025). A graduate of AIIMS Jodhpur, Anuj secured 1071 marks (Written: 867, Interview: 204) in his third attempt. 👩🏻‍🏫 Mrunal’s Annual Economy Current Affairs lecture series Win26- next Free Live stream class on Wednesday
20:14

🕵🏻‍♀️ UPSC AIR 1 Dr. Anuj Agnihotri's Full Study Plan & Booklist for Prelims & Mains with Dr. Mrunal Patel Timestamps 0:00 Highlights 1:47 Intro: Anuj Agnihotri AIR 1 2:02 History: Prelims & Mains 2:23 TN NCERT & IGNOU Strategy 2:52 Geography: NCERT Approach 3:12 Role of Unacademy Educators 3:52 NCERT Revision Tips 4:01 Geo Mains: Disasters & Current 4:34 Env & Ecology Intro 4:43 Env Laws & National Parks 5:12 Wikipedia Search Strategy 5:33 Economy: Why Fundamentals First 5:51 Mrunal Sir’s Economy Videos 5:56 Economy CA: Indian Express 6:13 Polity: Laxmikanth for Prelims 6:22 GS2 Governance Themes 6:42 Social Issues: Clubbing Method 7:21 The Hindu vs Indian Express 7:26 5 Years of Indian Express 7:48 Why skip CA Magazines? 7:59 Science & Tech Prep 8:36 PYQ Analysis & Filtering 8:56 Core Subjects Recap 9:00 Newspaper First Strategy 9:20 Static & Current Linkages 9:32 Reading Time & Note-making 9:44 Value Addition to Notes 10:03 Avoiding CA Compilations 10:24 Ethics: Keyword Approach 10:51 Definitions & Examples 10:58 Real Life & Mythic Examples 11:07 Ethics Case Study Mindset 11:32 Essay: Templates & Conclusion 12:25 Optional Subject Choice 12:29 Medical Science Optional 13:06 Med Science Resources 13:35 Revision Challenges 14:16 Data: Med Science Toppers 14:46 AIR 1: Honest Reflection 15:23 Message to Aspirants 15:55 Mock Tests & Mindset 16:07 Closing Remarks In this exclusive session, Dr. Mrunal Patel interviews Dr. Anuj Agnihotri (AIR 1, UPSC CSE 2025). A graduate of AIIMS Jodhpur, Anuj secured 1071 marks (Written: 867, Interview: 204) in his third attempt. 👩🏻‍🏫 Mrunal’s Annual Economy Current Affairs lecture series Win26- next Free Live stream class on Wednesday

Dr. Mrunal Patel (Ph.D.)

45,763 views • 5 months ago

Joey McGuire Exposes Schools For Late NIL Payments + How Texas Tech Landed Sorsby Over LSU | Bussin' 0:00 Intro 2:38 Texas Tech Spring Tour Recap 6:12 Lubbock BBQ & West Texas Football Culture 9:18 Sorsby First Impressions At Practice 15:30 Will Puts Sorsby On His Heisman List 19:52 Lavonte David Episode Callbacks 22:06 YouTube Comments & Future Spring Tour Stops 27:40 Michigan National Championship Basketball 28:46 Dan Orlovsky Bet Negotiation 36:03 Kirk Cousins To The Raiders 39:07 Orlovsky Counter Offers Keep Coming 41:37 Michigan's Tournament Dominance 44:23 NFL Draft Talk 46:07 Stadium Food Tier Talk 52:18 Highest Paid Non-QB In NFL History 58:37 Big Ten Baseball & NIL Discussion 1:00:00 WrestleMania Tag Team Partner Tier Talk 1:03:49 Pat McAfee & WWE Drama 1:05:17 Jalen Hurts & The Eagles 1:08:04 Taylor's Easter Story 1:17:54 Joe Burrow To The Eagles 1:21:29 Joey McGuire Interview Starts 1:23:24 Taylor's Mustache Would Be A Hit In West Texas 1:28:21 McGuire's Relationship With Cody Campbell 1:28:47 The Friday Night Lights Controversy 1:30:30 Texas Tech As NIL "Disruptors" 1:35:00 How Texas Tech Recruits In The Transfer Portal 1:37:13 Beating Schools In Recruiting 1:38:04 Why Texas Tech Never Misses A Payment 1:39:43 Developing Transfer Portal Players 1:41:06 Recruiting Sorsby 1:43:55 Is The NIL Landscape Sustainable? 1:48:26 Building A Team Culture With 27 Transfers 1:55:11 McGuire's Love For Texas Tech 1:56:43 What Would McGuire Change About College Football? 2:00:00 The 25-Day Playoff Layoff Problem 2:04:01 McGuire's Relationship With Matt Rhule 2:07:00 The Agent Problem In College Football 2:09:00 Big 12 Perception & Playoff Format Issues 2:12:00 McGuire's 24-Team Playoff Idea 2:16:13 Should A Team Make The Playoff After A Blowout Loss? 2:22:31 Texas Tech vs Nebraska 2:25:08 Bowl Games Should Be Season Openers 2:29:03 Sorsby & The 2025 Offensive Preview 2:32:56 McGuire's Coaching Journey 2:39:42 McGuire's Open Door Policy 2:40:28 Advice For Young Coaches 2:41:48 Fan Questions 2:46:00 New Big 12 Rivalries 2:48:58 Big 12 Coach Of The Year Snub 2:51:06 McGuire Is A Texas High School Football Legend 2:51:22 Scheduling Tougher Non-Conference Opponents 2:54:23 Bowl Games As Season Openers 2:56:16 If You Could Add Any Rule To College Football 2:59:50 The Bud Light Question 3:00:34 The "Believe" Trophy Case Story
3:03:15

Joey McGuire Exposes Schools For Late NIL Payments + How Texas Tech Landed Sorsby Over LSU | Bussin' 0:00 Intro 2:38 Texas Tech Spring Tour Recap 6:12 Lubbock BBQ & West Texas Football Culture 9:18 Sorsby First Impressions At Practice 15:30 Will Puts Sorsby On His Heisman List 19:52 Lavonte David Episode Callbacks 22:06 YouTube Comments & Future Spring Tour Stops 27:40 Michigan National Championship Basketball 28:46 Dan Orlovsky Bet Negotiation 36:03 Kirk Cousins To The Raiders 39:07 Orlovsky Counter Offers Keep Coming 41:37 Michigan's Tournament Dominance 44:23 NFL Draft Talk 46:07 Stadium Food Tier Talk 52:18 Highest Paid Non-QB In NFL History 58:37 Big Ten Baseball & NIL Discussion 1:00:00 WrestleMania Tag Team Partner Tier Talk 1:03:49 Pat McAfee & WWE Drama 1:05:17 Jalen Hurts & The Eagles 1:08:04 Taylor's Easter Story 1:17:54 Joe Burrow To The Eagles 1:21:29 Joey McGuire Interview Starts 1:23:24 Taylor's Mustache Would Be A Hit In West Texas 1:28:21 McGuire's Relationship With Cody Campbell 1:28:47 The Friday Night Lights Controversy 1:30:30 Texas Tech As NIL "Disruptors" 1:35:00 How Texas Tech Recruits In The Transfer Portal 1:37:13 Beating Schools In Recruiting 1:38:04 Why Texas Tech Never Misses A Payment 1:39:43 Developing Transfer Portal Players 1:41:06 Recruiting Sorsby 1:43:55 Is The NIL Landscape Sustainable? 1:48:26 Building A Team Culture With 27 Transfers 1:55:11 McGuire's Love For Texas Tech 1:56:43 What Would McGuire Change About College Football? 2:00:00 The 25-Day Playoff Layoff Problem 2:04:01 McGuire's Relationship With Matt Rhule 2:07:00 The Agent Problem In College Football 2:09:00 Big 12 Perception & Playoff Format Issues 2:12:00 McGuire's 24-Team Playoff Idea 2:16:13 Should A Team Make The Playoff After A Blowout Loss? 2:22:31 Texas Tech vs Nebraska 2:25:08 Bowl Games Should Be Season Openers 2:29:03 Sorsby & The 2025 Offensive Preview 2:32:56 McGuire's Coaching Journey 2:39:42 McGuire's Open Door Policy 2:40:28 Advice For Young Coaches 2:41:48 Fan Questions 2:46:00 New Big 12 Rivalries 2:48:58 Big 12 Coach Of The Year Snub 2:51:06 McGuire Is A Texas High School Football Legend 2:51:22 Scheduling Tougher Non-Conference Opponents 2:54:23 Bowl Games As Season Openers 2:56:16 If You Could Add Any Rule To College Football 2:59:50 The Bud Light Question 3:00:34 The "Believe" Trophy Case Story

Bussin' With The Boys

74,194 views • 4 months ago

Cam Jurgens On Replacing Jason Kelce For The Eagles + Nebraska’s Sweet 16 Run | Bussin’ 0:00 Intro 5:19 Callbacks 10:24 March Madness Sweet 16 Talk 16:15 Is Nebraska A Basketball School Now? 27:15 Coffin Callback 33:37 Flag Football Classic Recap + Team USA 43:42 Public Schools Top 25 50:08 Hater vs Passionate Fan 57:51 CAM JURGENS INTERVIEW STARTS 1:00:49 Cam's Family Cattle Farm 1:04:07 NIL Money Discussion 1:08:02 Forced Position Change 1:14:29 Growing Up A Husker 1:18:47 The Scott Frost Era 1:22:49 Nebraska's $250 Million Facility Upgrades 1:25:01 Meeting Jason Kelce & Winning A Super Bowl Year One 1:26:29 Philly Fan Base Is Built Different 1:30:50 Lane Johnson Is A Freak 1:38:51 Nebraska Basketball Is Finally Here 1:43:51 Big Ten Is Running College Sports 1:47:29 Best Live Sports 1:50:36 Cam's Injuries 1:53:25 Playing The NFC Championship With A Broken Back 1:58:06 Best Cheesesteak In Philly 1:59:34 Will & Taylor’s Hilarious Breakfast 2:02:40 Midwest Fast Food Hits Different 2:11:08 Talking Crap To Chris Jones 2:12:17 Stem Cell Treatment In Colombia 2:13:03 NAD Drip Racing 2:17:07 Pablo Escobar's Airstrip 2:18:20 Conspiracy Theories 2:21:04 Top Holidays 2:25:06 How Would You Fight A Ghost? 2:28:34 The NFL Is A Cold Business 2:34:19 Balancing Family & Football 2:39:38 Life After Football - Finding That Next Thing 2:45:09 Game Day Anxiety & Imposter Syndrome 2:51:16 How Long Does Cam Want To Play? 2:55:19 Small Town Kid In A Big City 2:57:33 Biggest Purchase After Signing 2:59:06 Masters Draft Weekend With The Boys
3:01:07

Cam Jurgens On Replacing Jason Kelce For The Eagles + Nebraska’s Sweet 16 Run | Bussin’ 0:00 Intro 5:19 Callbacks 10:24 March Madness Sweet 16 Talk 16:15 Is Nebraska A Basketball School Now? 27:15 Coffin Callback 33:37 Flag Football Classic Recap + Team USA 43:42 Public Schools Top 25 50:08 Hater vs Passionate Fan 57:51 CAM JURGENS INTERVIEW STARTS 1:00:49 Cam's Family Cattle Farm 1:04:07 NIL Money Discussion 1:08:02 Forced Position Change 1:14:29 Growing Up A Husker 1:18:47 The Scott Frost Era 1:22:49 Nebraska's $250 Million Facility Upgrades 1:25:01 Meeting Jason Kelce & Winning A Super Bowl Year One 1:26:29 Philly Fan Base Is Built Different 1:30:50 Lane Johnson Is A Freak 1:38:51 Nebraska Basketball Is Finally Here 1:43:51 Big Ten Is Running College Sports 1:47:29 Best Live Sports 1:50:36 Cam's Injuries 1:53:25 Playing The NFC Championship With A Broken Back 1:58:06 Best Cheesesteak In Philly 1:59:34 Will & Taylor’s Hilarious Breakfast 2:02:40 Midwest Fast Food Hits Different 2:11:08 Talking Crap To Chris Jones 2:12:17 Stem Cell Treatment In Colombia 2:13:03 NAD Drip Racing 2:17:07 Pablo Escobar's Airstrip 2:18:20 Conspiracy Theories 2:21:04 Top Holidays 2:25:06 How Would You Fight A Ghost? 2:28:34 The NFL Is A Cold Business 2:34:19 Balancing Family & Football 2:39:38 Life After Football - Finding That Next Thing 2:45:09 Game Day Anxiety & Imposter Syndrome 2:51:16 How Long Does Cam Want To Play? 2:55:19 Small Town Kid In A Big City 2:57:33 Biggest Purchase After Signing 2:59:06 Masters Draft Weekend With The Boys

Bussin' With The Boys

24,264 views • 5 months ago

Hezbollah has been boasting how it could destroy the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) and its escorts. Lets dive into how Hezbollah Terrorists could attack a US Navy Aircraft carrier in the Med, what could happen, and the possible outcomes, assisted with Command Development Team simulation software. To understand the footage shown, let me break down some basic concepts of modern naval combat: Military ships often use a concept called "EMCON", which stands for EMission CONtrol, or "Radio silence" in laymans terms. Consider it like this: if you are with a flashlight in the night, you can spot a person say 500 Meters away by shining at him with the flashlight. You will however, be able to see that flashlight from many kilometers away, without being seen, even if it is directed at you, giving you the location of the person with the flashlight, without disclosing your presence. So ships really avoid "radio emissions", such as radar. Carrier Strike Groups (CSG) like the Ford CSG WANT Radar coverage for their own safety, but not in a way that their location can be known. This is done by Airplanes that fly in the general vicinity of the CSG, providing coverage, without compromising the CSG location. The US Navy uses the E-2 Hawkeye for this in most cases. In this case here, we are not using the E-2 Hawkeye, but the (likely in Theater anyway) E-3 Sentry from NATO. A system that is likely LESS sophisticated than the cutting edge E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes that were visible on the USS Ford pictures that surfaced recently. We do not simulate any carrier based "Combat Air Patrol" either, to test the "ship based" defenses. The composition of the Ford CSG is modeled using the actual ships listed. The CSG is moving on a nothern course at 15 knots, under full EMCON, 115 miles off the coast. The maximum range of the Russian Bastion-P coastal missle complex is about 100 miles, we have to assume that the US Navy will sail their ships outside of (possible) Hezbollah radar range. We also assume, as this is a time of very heightened alert, that the US Navy has Rules of Engagement that would allow it to shoot down any Hezbollah drones or craft coming at it with apparent hostile intention. I have assumed this to be 50 miles away from the CSG in this scenario. Now lets look at the Hezbollah side. We assume to have 6 Bastion-P complexes, with 2 missles per Transport-Erector-Launcher (TEL). So if it can be figured out where the CSG is, 12 P-800 Oniks missle with speeds over Mach 2 would be able to engage the CSG. The problem however is, that you can not "shoot" at a ship without knowing its location. While this may sound very simple indeed, when the ship you are looking for does not disclose its location voluntarily, you can not go to "marinetraffic" and look for the carrier. You can also not use your airforce, if you do not really have one, like Hezbollah. You can not use Sattelites, if you have none. You can try to use drones, if you know the overall direction, or use radar. Land based Radar? Out of Range. Drones? Yes, lets fly drones to the overall direction, hoping to see the carrier. Satellites? Nope. Wait, lets ask Putin. He will probably be nice enough to us, to have a liasion tell us in real time from a russian sattelite where the CSG is. And thats what we are running with here, as drones will not reach the carrier. A russian sattelite could provide rather real time information on the CSG location, allowing manual targeting. The video will provide you with the results. A US CSG with such powerful escorts will not be fundamentally threatened by the assets of Hezbollah. It will have to defend, but will do so rather easily. At the conclusion of the Engagement, the CSG still has literally 100s of SM-2, SM-6 and ESSM Missles. Note: this is done on commercially available software, the software uses NTDS/APP6 icons, white is air radar range, yellow surface, green sonar. The white cones off the missles are their onboard active radar seeker. If you have any questions understanding any of the things displyed, please ask. Note that this is a hobby analysis with publicly available data and tools, and not military research. Thanks for reading! #usnavy #HezbollahTerrorists #hezbullah #hezbollah #israel #IsraelUnderAttack #ukraine #russia #nato Naval News SubBrief Tyler Rogoway Status-6 (War & Military News) TheIntelFrog @CovertShores Raw Combat log output, starting with Hezbollah detecting CSG via RU Proxy: 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1070 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1149.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1071 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1149.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1072 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1149.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1073 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1145.4nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1074 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1153.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1075 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1148nm 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1073 has been positively identified as: DDG 63 Carney [Arleigh Burke Flight I] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1121 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1071 has been positively identified as: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1125 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1070 has been positively identified as: CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1125 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1072 has been positively identified as: DDG 61 Ramage [Arleigh Burke Flight I] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1125 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1074 has been positively identified as: DDG 80 Roosevelt [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1129 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1075 has been positively identified as: CG 60 Normandy [Ticonderoga Baseline 3, VLS] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1124 nm) 13/10/2023 12:47:23 - [USA] Contact: BOGEY #24 has been classified as: Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] - Determined as: Unfriendly (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: AN/SPY-1D(V) MFR [ABM Mod]] [NCTR mode] at 56.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:47:23 - [USA] Contact: BOGEY #26 has been classified as: Shahed-161 UAV - Determined as: Unfriendly (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: AN/SPY-1D(V) MFR [ABM Mod]] [NCTR mode] at 34.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3507 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 95.2nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3508 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.4nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3509 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 95.6nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3510 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.8nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3511 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.1nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3512 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.4nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3513 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 97.1nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3514 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 98nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3515 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 97.2nm 13/10/2023 12:48:12 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3576 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 68deg - 91nm 13/10/2023 12:48:12 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3577 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 89.9nm 13/10/2023 12:48:12 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3578 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 90.7nm 13/10/2023 12:48:13 - Side 'Hezbollah' is now considered HOSTILE to USA 13/10/2023 12:48:13 - [USA] Contact: Shahed-161 UAV #26 has been manually marked as hostile! 13/10/2023 12:48:20 - [USA] Contact: BOGEY #22 has been manually marked as hostile! 13/10/2023 12:48:55 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1238 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 266deg - 10nm 13/10/2023 12:48:59 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1243 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 266deg - 8.6nm 13/10/2023 12:49:00 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1245 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 234deg - 13.3nm 13/10/2023 12:49:17 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA #40 is attacking Shahed-161 UAV with a base PH of 90%. PH adjusted for weapon speed: 36% (pure-aerodynamic attitude control). Intercept angle is 304 deg - hit probability adjusted to 25%.Final PH: 25%. Result: 30 - MISS 13/10/2023 12:49:17 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1238 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:25 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1271 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 248deg - 13.1nm 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IB #41 is attacking Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 51 deg - hit probability adjusted to 65%.Final PH: 65%. Result: 12 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has suffered weapon damage: 89.9 DPs 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1271 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [USA] Contact Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] #23 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IB #42 is attacking Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 313 deg - hit probability adjusted to 66%.Final PH: 66%. Result: 11 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has suffered weapon damage: 89.9 DPs 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1243 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [USA] Contact Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] #24 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IB #43 is attacking Shahed-161 UAV with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 65 deg - hit probability adjusted to 57%.Final PH: 57%. Result: 11 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has suffered weapon damage: 89.9 DPs 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1245 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [USA] Contact Shahed-161 UAV #25 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:54 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1301 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 258deg - 10.5nm 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA #44 is attacking Shahed-161 UAV with a base PH of 90%. PH adjusted for weapon speed: 83% (pure-aerodynamic attitude control). Target signature modifier: -5% (Director [Active Radar Seeker] has tech-gen: Late 2010s). Intercept angle is 316 deg - hit probability adjusted to 59%.Final PH: 59%. Result: 42 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has suffered weapon damage: 89 DPs 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1301 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [USA] Contact Shahed-161 UAV #26 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:51:58 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3507 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:51:59 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3508 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:51:59 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3509 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:51:59 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3511 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:00 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3510 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:00 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3512 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:04 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3513 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:04 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3577 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:05 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3514 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:05 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3515 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:06 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3576 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:06 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3578 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:08 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #45 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #28 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 357 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 34 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:08 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3507 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:09 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #46 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #29 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 358 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 31 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:09 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3508 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #49 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #32 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 358 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 36 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3511 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #52 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #31 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 355 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 9 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #57 has been redirected to new target: GuidedWeapon #3515 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3510 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #50 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #30 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 356 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 25 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3509 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #55 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #33 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 355 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 20 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #59 has been redirected to new target: GuidedWeapon #3576 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3512 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:13 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #47 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:14 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #48 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:15 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #57 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #36 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 0 deg - hit probability adjusted to 80%.Final PH: 80%. Result: 71 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:15 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3515 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #60 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #34 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 360 deg - hit probability adjusted to 80%.Final PH: 80%. Result: 49 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #65 has no eligible alternative target to be redirected to... 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3513 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #51 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #54 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #58 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #59 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #38 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 357 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 75 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3576 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #63 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #38 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 359 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 57 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #70 has been redirected to new target: GuidedWeapon #3514 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3577 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #53 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #65 has no eligible alternative target to be redirected to... 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #56 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #61 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #70 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #35 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 358 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 63 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3514 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA #73 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #39 with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 355 deg - hit probability adjusted to 88%.Final PH: 88%. Result: 34 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3578 has been lost.
9:08

Hezbollah has been boasting how it could destroy the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) and its escorts. Lets dive into how Hezbollah Terrorists could attack a US Navy Aircraft carrier in the Med, what could happen, and the possible outcomes, assisted with Command Development Team simulation software. To understand the footage shown, let me break down some basic concepts of modern naval combat: Military ships often use a concept called "EMCON", which stands for EMission CONtrol, or "Radio silence" in laymans terms. Consider it like this: if you are with a flashlight in the night, you can spot a person say 500 Meters away by shining at him with the flashlight. You will however, be able to see that flashlight from many kilometers away, without being seen, even if it is directed at you, giving you the location of the person with the flashlight, without disclosing your presence. So ships really avoid "radio emissions", such as radar. Carrier Strike Groups (CSG) like the Ford CSG WANT Radar coverage for their own safety, but not in a way that their location can be known. This is done by Airplanes that fly in the general vicinity of the CSG, providing coverage, without compromising the CSG location. The US Navy uses the E-2 Hawkeye for this in most cases. In this case here, we are not using the E-2 Hawkeye, but the (likely in Theater anyway) E-3 Sentry from NATO. A system that is likely LESS sophisticated than the cutting edge E-2D Advanced Hawkeyes that were visible on the USS Ford pictures that surfaced recently. We do not simulate any carrier based "Combat Air Patrol" either, to test the "ship based" defenses. The composition of the Ford CSG is modeled using the actual ships listed. The CSG is moving on a nothern course at 15 knots, under full EMCON, 115 miles off the coast. The maximum range of the Russian Bastion-P coastal missle complex is about 100 miles, we have to assume that the US Navy will sail their ships outside of (possible) Hezbollah radar range. We also assume, as this is a time of very heightened alert, that the US Navy has Rules of Engagement that would allow it to shoot down any Hezbollah drones or craft coming at it with apparent hostile intention. I have assumed this to be 50 miles away from the CSG in this scenario. Now lets look at the Hezbollah side. We assume to have 6 Bastion-P complexes, with 2 missles per Transport-Erector-Launcher (TEL). So if it can be figured out where the CSG is, 12 P-800 Oniks missle with speeds over Mach 2 would be able to engage the CSG. The problem however is, that you can not "shoot" at a ship without knowing its location. While this may sound very simple indeed, when the ship you are looking for does not disclose its location voluntarily, you can not go to "marinetraffic" and look for the carrier. You can also not use your airforce, if you do not really have one, like Hezbollah. You can not use Sattelites, if you have none. You can try to use drones, if you know the overall direction, or use radar. Land based Radar? Out of Range. Drones? Yes, lets fly drones to the overall direction, hoping to see the carrier. Satellites? Nope. Wait, lets ask Putin. He will probably be nice enough to us, to have a liasion tell us in real time from a russian sattelite where the CSG is. And thats what we are running with here, as drones will not reach the carrier. A russian sattelite could provide rather real time information on the CSG location, allowing manual targeting. The video will provide you with the results. A US CSG with such powerful escorts will not be fundamentally threatened by the assets of Hezbollah. It will have to defend, but will do so rather easily. At the conclusion of the Engagement, the CSG still has literally 100s of SM-2, SM-6 and ESSM Missles. Note: this is done on commercially available software, the software uses NTDS/APP6 icons, white is air radar range, yellow surface, green sonar. The white cones off the missles are their onboard active radar seeker. If you have any questions understanding any of the things displyed, please ask. Note that this is a hobby analysis with publicly available data and tools, and not military research. Thanks for reading! #usnavy #HezbollahTerrorists #hezbullah #hezbollah #israel #IsraelUnderAttack #ukraine #russia #nato Naval News SubBrief Tyler Rogoway Status-6 (War & Military News) TheIntelFrog @CovertShores Raw Combat log output, starting with Hezbollah detecting CSG via RU Proxy: 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1070 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1149.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1071 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1149.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1072 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1149.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1073 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1145.4nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1074 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1153.3nm 13/10/2023 12:46:13 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SKUNK #1075 - Detected by Resurs P1 [Sensors: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at 177deg - 1148nm 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1073 has been positively identified as: DDG 63 Carney [Arleigh Burke Flight I] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1121 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1071 has been positively identified as: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1125 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1070 has been positively identified as: CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1125 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1072 has been positively identified as: DDG 61 Ramage [Arleigh Burke Flight I] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1125 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1074 has been positively identified as: DDG 80 Roosevelt [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1129 nm) 13/10/2023 12:46:23 - [Hezbollah] Contact: SKUNK #1075 has been positively identified as: CG 60 Normandy [Ticonderoga Baseline 3, VLS] - Determined as: Hostile (ID by: Resurs P1 [Sensor: Generic Satellite Visual Camera] at Estimated 1124 nm) 13/10/2023 12:47:23 - [USA] Contact: BOGEY #24 has been classified as: Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] - Determined as: Unfriendly (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: AN/SPY-1D(V) MFR [ABM Mod]] [NCTR mode] at 56.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:47:23 - [USA] Contact: BOGEY #26 has been classified as: Shahed-161 UAV - Determined as: Unfriendly (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: AN/SPY-1D(V) MFR [ABM Mod]] [NCTR mode] at 34.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3507 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 95.2nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3508 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.4nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3509 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 95.6nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3510 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.8nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3511 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.1nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3512 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 96.4nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3513 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 97.1nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3514 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 98nm 13/10/2023 12:47:52 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3515 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 70deg - 97.2nm 13/10/2023 12:48:12 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3576 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 68deg - 91nm 13/10/2023 12:48:12 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3577 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 89.9nm 13/10/2023 12:48:12 - [USA] New contact! Designated VAMPIRE #3578 - Detected by E-3A Sentry [Sensors: AN/APY-2 RSIP] at 69deg - 90.7nm 13/10/2023 12:48:13 - Side 'Hezbollah' is now considered HOSTILE to USA 13/10/2023 12:48:13 - [USA] Contact: Shahed-161 UAV #26 has been manually marked as hostile! 13/10/2023 12:48:20 - [USA] Contact: BOGEY #22 has been manually marked as hostile! 13/10/2023 12:48:55 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1238 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 266deg - 10nm 13/10/2023 12:48:59 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1243 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 266deg - 8.6nm 13/10/2023 12:49:00 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1245 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 234deg - 13.3nm 13/10/2023 12:49:17 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA #40 is attacking Shahed-161 UAV with a base PH of 90%. PH adjusted for weapon speed: 36% (pure-aerodynamic attitude control). Intercept angle is 304 deg - hit probability adjusted to 25%.Final PH: 25%. Result: 30 - MISS 13/10/2023 12:49:17 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1238 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:25 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1271 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 248deg - 13.1nm 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IB #41 is attacking Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 51 deg - hit probability adjusted to 65%.Final PH: 65%. Result: 12 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has suffered weapon damage: 89.9 DPs 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1271 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:49:34 - [USA] Contact Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] #23 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IB #42 is attacking Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 313 deg - hit probability adjusted to 66%.Final PH: 66%. Result: 11 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has suffered weapon damage: 89.9 DPs 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1243 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [Hezbollah] Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:49:39 - [USA] Contact Ababil-3 UAV [Mod. Seeker 2D Copy] #24 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IB #43 is attacking Shahed-161 UAV with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 65 deg - hit probability adjusted to 57%.Final PH: 57%. Result: 11 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has suffered weapon damage: 89.9 DPs 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1245 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:49:43 - [USA] Contact Shahed-161 UAV #25 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:49:54 - [Hezbollah] New contact! Designated SAM #1301 - Detected by Shahed-161 UAV [Sensors: Generic IRST] at 258deg - 10.5nm 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA #44 is attacking Shahed-161 UAV with a base PH of 90%. PH adjusted for weapon speed: 83% (pure-aerodynamic attitude control). Target signature modifier: -5% (Director [Active Radar Seeker] has tech-gen: Late 2010s). Intercept angle is 316 deg - hit probability adjusted to 59%.Final PH: 59%. Result: 42 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has suffered weapon damage: 89 DPs 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [Hezbollah] Hezbollah :Contact SAM #1301 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [Hezbollah] Shahed-161 UAV has been destroyed! 13/10/2023 12:50:10 - [USA] Contact Shahed-161 UAV #26 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:51:58 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3507 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:51:59 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3508 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:51:59 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3509 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:51:59 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3511 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:00 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3510 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:00 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3512 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:04 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3513 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:04 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3577 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:05 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3514 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:05 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3515 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:06 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3576 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 13.9 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:06 - [USA] Contact: VAMPIRE #3578 has been type-classified as: GuidedWeapon (Classification by: DDG 116 Thomas Hudner [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA Technology Insertion] [Sensor: Mk46 Mod 1 [CCD]] at 14 nm) 13/10/2023 12:52:08 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #45 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #28 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 357 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 34 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:08 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3507 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:09 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #46 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #29 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 358 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 31 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:09 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3508 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #49 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #32 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 358 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 36 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3511 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #52 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #31 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 355 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 9 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #57 has been redirected to new target: GuidedWeapon #3515 13/10/2023 12:52:11 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3510 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #50 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #30 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 356 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 25 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3509 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #55 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #33 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 355 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 20 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #59 has been redirected to new target: GuidedWeapon #3576 13/10/2023 12:52:12 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3512 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:13 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #47 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:14 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #48 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:15 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #57 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #36 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 0 deg - hit probability adjusted to 80%.Final PH: 80%. Result: 71 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:15 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3515 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #60 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #34 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 360 deg - hit probability adjusted to 80%.Final PH: 80%. Result: 49 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #65 has no eligible alternative target to be redirected to... 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3513 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #51 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #54 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #58 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #59 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #38 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 357 deg - hit probability adjusted to 78%.Final PH: 78%. Result: 75 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3576 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #63 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #38 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 359 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 57 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #70 has been redirected to new target: GuidedWeapon #3514 13/10/2023 12:52:16 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3577 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #53 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #65 has no eligible alternative target to be redirected to... 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #56 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:17 - [USA] Weapon: RIM-162D ESSM #61 is running blind for more than 5 sec... self-destructing. 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - Weapon: RIM-162A ESSM #70 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #35 with a base PH of 90%. Target speed modifier: -10%. Intercept angle is 358 deg - hit probability adjusted to 79%.Final PH: 79%. Result: 63 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3514 has been lost. 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - Weapon: RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA #73 is attacking SSC-5 Stooge [P-800 Yakhont] #39 with a base PH of 90%. Intercept angle is 355 deg - hit probability adjusted to 88%.Final PH: 88%. Result: 34 - HIT 13/10/2023 12:52:18 - [USA] Contact GuidedWeapon #3578 has been lost.

C Schmitz

47,464 views • 2 years ago

Eli Manning On His Hall of Fame Snub + Beating Tom Brady Twice In The Super Bowl | Bussin' 0:00 Open 2:28 Delanie Walker Joins the Boys 3:25 Delanie's New Corvette 6:42 Matt Malone's Free Car Road Trip 9:09 Delanie Does Content Ideas 14:48 Mother's Day Weekend 17:50 Kevin Hart Roast Recap 24:57 UFC Weekend + Strickland Wins the Belt 30:54 EA Sports Trip + Madden Ratings 36:02 Mitch Dog Sitting Waffle 42:47 Ro Spicy Tier Talk 55:12 Disney Channel Movies Ranking 1:00:33 Card Collecting 1:11:05 Max Crosby's Music 1:14:08 INTERVIEW STARTS 1:15:53 Will's Last Game Against Eli 1:19:07 Film Study + Eli's Audibles 1:23:03 OBJ Boat Trip to Miami 1:25:30 Locker Room Pranks 1:29:24 Rookie Pranks + Dinners 1:35:08 Code Words for Audibles 1:38:07 Halloween Costumes 1:39:08 Eli's Favorite Holiday 1:41:38 Trolling Tom Brady 1:42:47 Eli + Brady Super Bowl Banter 1:44:19 The 07 Playoff Run 1:47:16 Peyton the Wedding Planner 1:49:04 Peyton's Recruiting Tape Recorder 1:51:21 Eli's Leadership Style 1:55:07 Eli’s Draft Day 1:57:28 What Was Wrong With the Chargers 2:02:24 Eli's Wish List + Why the Giants 2:04:34 Hall of Fame Discussion 2:07:45 Drafting OBJ + His Rookie Breakout 2:13:10 Eli’s Super Bowl Commercial 2:15:54 Most Rattled Game 2:20:04 Choosing Ole Miss 2:21:51 Big Ten + College Football Playoff 2:22:53 Manning Nephews Arch + Marshall + Charlie 2:24:27 Best Advice to Arch Manning 2:25:29 Youth Sports 2:31:00 Fan Questions 2:31:50 Beating Peyton in Basketball 2:33:05 Eli's Last Baseball At Bat 2:36:08 Funniest Manning Brother 2:38:57 Bud Light Question 2:40:57 Chad Powers Show 2:42:01 Clay Matthews Text
2:43:05

Eli Manning On His Hall of Fame Snub + Beating Tom Brady Twice In The Super Bowl | Bussin' 0:00 Open 2:28 Delanie Walker Joins the Boys 3:25 Delanie's New Corvette 6:42 Matt Malone's Free Car Road Trip 9:09 Delanie Does Content Ideas 14:48 Mother's Day Weekend 17:50 Kevin Hart Roast Recap 24:57 UFC Weekend + Strickland Wins the Belt 30:54 EA Sports Trip + Madden Ratings 36:02 Mitch Dog Sitting Waffle 42:47 Ro Spicy Tier Talk 55:12 Disney Channel Movies Ranking 1:00:33 Card Collecting 1:11:05 Max Crosby's Music 1:14:08 INTERVIEW STARTS 1:15:53 Will's Last Game Against Eli 1:19:07 Film Study + Eli's Audibles 1:23:03 OBJ Boat Trip to Miami 1:25:30 Locker Room Pranks 1:29:24 Rookie Pranks + Dinners 1:35:08 Code Words for Audibles 1:38:07 Halloween Costumes 1:39:08 Eli's Favorite Holiday 1:41:38 Trolling Tom Brady 1:42:47 Eli + Brady Super Bowl Banter 1:44:19 The 07 Playoff Run 1:47:16 Peyton the Wedding Planner 1:49:04 Peyton's Recruiting Tape Recorder 1:51:21 Eli's Leadership Style 1:55:07 Eli’s Draft Day 1:57:28 What Was Wrong With the Chargers 2:02:24 Eli's Wish List + Why the Giants 2:04:34 Hall of Fame Discussion 2:07:45 Drafting OBJ + His Rookie Breakout 2:13:10 Eli’s Super Bowl Commercial 2:15:54 Most Rattled Game 2:20:04 Choosing Ole Miss 2:21:51 Big Ten + College Football Playoff 2:22:53 Manning Nephews Arch + Marshall + Charlie 2:24:27 Best Advice to Arch Manning 2:25:29 Youth Sports 2:31:00 Fan Questions 2:31:50 Beating Peyton in Basketball 2:33:05 Eli's Last Baseball At Bat 2:36:08 Funniest Manning Brother 2:38:57 Bud Light Question 2:40:57 Chad Powers Show 2:42:01 Clay Matthews Text

Bussin' With The Boys

21,965 views • 3 months ago

Economy Annual Current Affairs - 100 Key Highlights for UPSC, SSC, Banking Exams by Dr.Mrunal Patel Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:00:24 - Headline Compilation 00:03:09 - Pillar 1: Money and Banking 00:03:31 - Deadline Enforcement 00:05:11 - Ease of Doing Business vs Public Safety 00:06:41 - Cheque Clearance Postponement 00:07:03 - UPI Updates 00:07:25 - Bitcoin Volatility and Trump 00:09:13 - Stablecoins and China Digital Yuan 00:10:19 - RBI Governors 00:11:02 - NPAs and Credit Card Issues 00:12:30 - Gold Loan Rules Relaxation 00:13:16 - IBC Code Amendments 00:13:39 - Pillar 2: Share Market 00:14:17 - Gold Price Surge and Smuggling 00:15:30 - Sovereign Gold Bonds Changes 00:16:13 - SEBI Leadership Shift 00:17:03 - Adani US Court Issues 00:18:08 - Tech Bubble Warnings 00:19:17 - Market Cap Examples 00:20:05 - Elon Musk Tesla Demands 00:20:55 - Over-Financialization Concerns 00:21:14 - F&O Trading Losses 00:22:21 - Corporate Nepotism at Reliance 00:23:09 - Pillar 1D: Insurance FDI Increase 00:23:51 - PM Jan Arogya Yojana Disputes 00:24:29 - Bima Sugam Portal 00:24:53 - Pension Incentives for Freshers 00:26:06 - Digital KYC Accessibility 00:27:12 - Pillar 2: Budget Taxation GST 00:27:38 Income tax relief 00:28:40 GST 2.0 00:30:43 Pan-Masala Cess 00:31:28 Finance Commission 00:31:48 Subsidies Revdi Culture 00:34:24 - Rupee Depreciation Reasons 00:34:59 - Trump Policies Impact 00:35:20 - Tariff Wars and Immigration 00:35:51 - Beautiful Bill and DOGE 00:36:12 - WTO Issues 00:36:56 - Democracy in Growth 00:37:21 - China Supply Chain Weaponization 00:37:51 - SCO and RIC Meetings 00:38:18 - Diplomacy No Permanent Friends 00:38:42 - FTA with UK 00:39:09 - Opportunities in Crisis 00:39:32 - EU Trade Deals 00:40:19 - Sanctions on Nayara 00:40:40 - Microsoft Reaction 00:41:02 - Digital Policy Need 00:41:26 - Pillar 4: Sectors of Economy 00:41:53 - PM Dhanya Krishi Yojana 00:42:14 - Makhana in Bihar 00:42:38 - No Major Farmer Sops 00:43:03 - Agriculture Budget 00:43:35 - Manufacturing PLI 00:43:57 - Startups and Criticism 00:44:31 - Startup Counterarguments 00:45:03 - Kolhapuri Chappal GI 00:45:52 - Four Labor Codes 00:46:16 - Engels Pause AI 00:46:42 - IT Job Losses 00:47:07 - Industrial Revolution Comparison 00:47:16 - PLFS Data 00:47:42 - GDP IMF Projection 00:48:01 - Growth vs Development 00:48:14 - Data Quality C Grade 00:48:33 - Methodology Changes 00:48:55 - Pillar 5: Infrastructure 00:49:22 - Nuclear Liability 00:50:06 - Mineral Partnerships 00:50:29 - US Exclusion 00:50:46 - Transport Pilot Rules 00:51:06 - Toll Systems 00:51:38 - Ethanol Blending 00:51:57 - Smart Cities Funding End 00:52:54 - Communication Infra 00:53:19 - Pillar 6: Census Delay 00:53:35 - Demographic Challenges 00:54:17 - Population Challenges 00:54:36 - Pension Age Debates 00:55:04 - Health Education Updates 00:55:28 - PM SHRI Scheme 00:55:40 - Open Book Exams 00:56:19 - IIT Issues 00:56:43 - Hindi Medium Initiative 00:57:05 - MGNREGA Extensions 00:57:48 - Poverty Definitions 00:58:27 - Inequality Gini 00:59:12 - HDI Rankings 00:59:43 - Other Indexes 00:59:48 - Win26 Series Announcement 01:00:10 - PCB15 Course Details 01:01:10 - Unacademy Offer 01:02:04 - Final Closing ✍🏻 Join Unacademy for UPSC Prelims + Mains Coaching:
1:02:08

Economy Annual Current Affairs - 100 Key Highlights for UPSC, SSC, Banking Exams by Dr.Mrunal Patel Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Introduction 00:00:24 - Headline Compilation 00:03:09 - Pillar 1: Money and Banking 00:03:31 - Deadline Enforcement 00:05:11 - Ease of Doing Business vs Public Safety 00:06:41 - Cheque Clearance Postponement 00:07:03 - UPI Updates 00:07:25 - Bitcoin Volatility and Trump 00:09:13 - Stablecoins and China Digital Yuan 00:10:19 - RBI Governors 00:11:02 - NPAs and Credit Card Issues 00:12:30 - Gold Loan Rules Relaxation 00:13:16 - IBC Code Amendments 00:13:39 - Pillar 2: Share Market 00:14:17 - Gold Price Surge and Smuggling 00:15:30 - Sovereign Gold Bonds Changes 00:16:13 - SEBI Leadership Shift 00:17:03 - Adani US Court Issues 00:18:08 - Tech Bubble Warnings 00:19:17 - Market Cap Examples 00:20:05 - Elon Musk Tesla Demands 00:20:55 - Over-Financialization Concerns 00:21:14 - F&O Trading Losses 00:22:21 - Corporate Nepotism at Reliance 00:23:09 - Pillar 1D: Insurance FDI Increase 00:23:51 - PM Jan Arogya Yojana Disputes 00:24:29 - Bima Sugam Portal 00:24:53 - Pension Incentives for Freshers 00:26:06 - Digital KYC Accessibility 00:27:12 - Pillar 2: Budget Taxation GST 00:27:38 Income tax relief 00:28:40 GST 2.0 00:30:43 Pan-Masala Cess 00:31:28 Finance Commission 00:31:48 Subsidies Revdi Culture 00:34:24 - Rupee Depreciation Reasons 00:34:59 - Trump Policies Impact 00:35:20 - Tariff Wars and Immigration 00:35:51 - Beautiful Bill and DOGE 00:36:12 - WTO Issues 00:36:56 - Democracy in Growth 00:37:21 - China Supply Chain Weaponization 00:37:51 - SCO and RIC Meetings 00:38:18 - Diplomacy No Permanent Friends 00:38:42 - FTA with UK 00:39:09 - Opportunities in Crisis 00:39:32 - EU Trade Deals 00:40:19 - Sanctions on Nayara 00:40:40 - Microsoft Reaction 00:41:02 - Digital Policy Need 00:41:26 - Pillar 4: Sectors of Economy 00:41:53 - PM Dhanya Krishi Yojana 00:42:14 - Makhana in Bihar 00:42:38 - No Major Farmer Sops 00:43:03 - Agriculture Budget 00:43:35 - Manufacturing PLI 00:43:57 - Startups and Criticism 00:44:31 - Startup Counterarguments 00:45:03 - Kolhapuri Chappal GI 00:45:52 - Four Labor Codes 00:46:16 - Engels Pause AI 00:46:42 - IT Job Losses 00:47:07 - Industrial Revolution Comparison 00:47:16 - PLFS Data 00:47:42 - GDP IMF Projection 00:48:01 - Growth vs Development 00:48:14 - Data Quality C Grade 00:48:33 - Methodology Changes 00:48:55 - Pillar 5: Infrastructure 00:49:22 - Nuclear Liability 00:50:06 - Mineral Partnerships 00:50:29 - US Exclusion 00:50:46 - Transport Pilot Rules 00:51:06 - Toll Systems 00:51:38 - Ethanol Blending 00:51:57 - Smart Cities Funding End 00:52:54 - Communication Infra 00:53:19 - Pillar 6: Census Delay 00:53:35 - Demographic Challenges 00:54:17 - Population Challenges 00:54:36 - Pension Age Debates 00:55:04 - Health Education Updates 00:55:28 - PM SHRI Scheme 00:55:40 - Open Book Exams 00:56:19 - IIT Issues 00:56:43 - Hindi Medium Initiative 00:57:05 - MGNREGA Extensions 00:57:48 - Poverty Definitions 00:58:27 - Inequality Gini 00:59:12 - HDI Rankings 00:59:43 - Other Indexes 00:59:48 - Win26 Series Announcement 01:00:10 - PCB15 Course Details 01:01:10 - Unacademy Offer 01:02:04 - Final Closing ✍🏻 Join Unacademy for UPSC Prelims + Mains Coaching:

Dr. Mrunal Patel (Ph.D.)

20,867 views • 7 months ago

Sat down with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. Matt McCusker Tom Segura AKA Mr. Ladybug to talk about Retardmaxxing, erectile function, and more... 0:00 The Case For Daily Cialis 3:35 How Viagra Was Discovered 4:59 Athletes Take Cialis Before Games 5:24 Matt's Morning Routine 6:08 Tom Lost 25 Lbs On Set 8:28 Comedians Vs. Actors 11:07 Pee-Wee Herman & Laird Hamilton 14:02 Brain Science Of Comedy 15:15 Comedy Either Lands Or Doesn't 17:17 Greatness Is Objective 23:03 The Onion Buys InfoWars 24:05 Alex Jones Owes $1.5 Billion 27:42 What Love Island Was Like 28:50 Sleep Score Affects Performance 30:39 Retardmaxxing Explained 32:37 Marc Andreessen On Retardmaxxing 35:27 Steve Jobs Had Rough Edges 39:08 Diddy Video Raised The Bar 46:28 AI Versions Of Your Exes 49:51 More Cameras In America Than China 55:10 Waymo With Wife And Kids 57:31 Uber Driver Says CIA Killed JFK 1:01:51 If Elon Says Moon Landing Is Fake 1:03:34 Epstein Changed His Will 1:08:14 Trump Assassination Attempt Evaporated 1:12:00 Secret Service Fights Counterfeiting 1:17:57 Cocaine Easier To Find Than Creatine 1:28:49 Will 2026 Be A Golden Era? 1:30:28 Algorithm Is A Borderline Girlfriend 1:30:49 Who Even Uses TVs At Hotels? 1:31:11 Adrenaline After Performing 1:34:29 Huberman's 700-Page Book 1:39:58 Hot Shower To Fall Asleep 1:44:04 Melatonin Shrinks Your Balls 1:47:27 Tom's Ultra-Competitive 10-Year-Old 1:55:27 The 3-Year-Old "Expert" 2:00:23 ElevenLabs Stole Chris's Voice 2:05:16 Can You Make DMT From Your Neck 2:11:58 Johnny Depp's Insane Spending 2:25:47 The Marshmallow Test Truth 2:30:05 Huberman's Beef Cameo 2:32:02 Sunlight & Skin Health Explained Paid partnerships included.
2:41:49

Sat down with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. Matt McCusker Tom Segura AKA Mr. Ladybug to talk about Retardmaxxing, erectile function, and more... 0:00 The Case For Daily Cialis 3:35 How Viagra Was Discovered 4:59 Athletes Take Cialis Before Games 5:24 Matt's Morning Routine 6:08 Tom Lost 25 Lbs On Set 8:28 Comedians Vs. Actors 11:07 Pee-Wee Herman & Laird Hamilton 14:02 Brain Science Of Comedy 15:15 Comedy Either Lands Or Doesn't 17:17 Greatness Is Objective 23:03 The Onion Buys InfoWars 24:05 Alex Jones Owes $1.5 Billion 27:42 What Love Island Was Like 28:50 Sleep Score Affects Performance 30:39 Retardmaxxing Explained 32:37 Marc Andreessen On Retardmaxxing 35:27 Steve Jobs Had Rough Edges 39:08 Diddy Video Raised The Bar 46:28 AI Versions Of Your Exes 49:51 More Cameras In America Than China 55:10 Waymo With Wife And Kids 57:31 Uber Driver Says CIA Killed JFK 1:01:51 If Elon Says Moon Landing Is Fake 1:03:34 Epstein Changed His Will 1:08:14 Trump Assassination Attempt Evaporated 1:12:00 Secret Service Fights Counterfeiting 1:17:57 Cocaine Easier To Find Than Creatine 1:28:49 Will 2026 Be A Golden Era? 1:30:28 Algorithm Is A Borderline Girlfriend 1:30:49 Who Even Uses TVs At Hotels? 1:31:11 Adrenaline After Performing 1:34:29 Huberman's 700-Page Book 1:39:58 Hot Shower To Fall Asleep 1:44:04 Melatonin Shrinks Your Balls 1:47:27 Tom's Ultra-Competitive 10-Year-Old 1:55:27 The 3-Year-Old "Expert" 2:00:23 ElevenLabs Stole Chris's Voice 2:05:16 Can You Make DMT From Your Neck 2:11:58 Johnny Depp's Insane Spending 2:25:47 The Marshmallow Test Truth 2:30:05 Huberman's Beef Cameo 2:32:02 Sunlight & Skin Health Explained Paid partnerships included.

Chris Williamson

161,625 views • 2 months ago

My dear friend, Vlad Tenev, changed the landscape of investing forever! The rise of the retail investor is largely due to Robinhood's success... and in this new Journey Man, we discuss it all... Enjoy! 00:00 - Intro 00:53 - Introducing Vlad Tenev of Robinhood 01:27 - Why Take on Wall Street? 01:54 - Robinhood’s Zero-Fee Origin Story 02:53 - Inspiration from Instagram and Uber 04:24 - Reimagining Trading for Mobile 05:05 - The Challenge of Disrupting Finance 05:42 - Why Everything Is Hard 06:34 - Early Wrong Assumptions 07:42 - Raising Capital with a Small Vision 08:48 - Funding Robinhood on AngelList 09:50 - Early Investors Changed Their Lives 10:38 - The Crypto Explosion Begins 11:07 - Considering a Bitcoin Exchange First 12:17 - Bitcoin’s Early Skepticism and Growth 13:08 - Robinhood Launches Crypto in 2018 14:03 - 2020: Crypto Revenue Surges Overnight 15:04 - The Challenge of Crypto Cyclicality 16:11 - Staffing a Volatile Business 17:10 - Building Robinhood’s Lean Crypto Team 18:46 - Robinhood’s First Crypto Event Coming 19:38 - Where TradFi Meets DeFi 20:34 - Tokenizing Everything 21:09 - Robinhood’s Vision for Crypto + Finance 21:47 - Thoughts on Crypto Options Demand 23:04 - Why Crypto Options Haven’t Taken Off 24:09 - Millennials and the Speculative Economy 25:22 - Democratizing Trading for Everyone 26:08 - Why Buy-and-Hold Doesn’t Work for All 27:15 - Trading vs Investing: A Matter of Wealth 28:01 - Trading as a Skill Anyone Can Build 29:13 - Robinhood’s Role in Onboarding Millions 30:06 - The Fed's Role and Retail Insight 31:03 - The Rise of the Retail Macro Trader 32:17 - Helping Users Succeed with Robinhood Strategies 33:35 - Power of Community and the Hive Mind 34:55 - Will AI Disrupt Community Too? 36:14 - Technological Waves and Investor Opportunity 37:10 - Human Purpose in an AI World 37:52 - Tokenizing Human Connection 38:28 - Creators, Platforms, and Future-Proofing 39:26 - Vlad’s Long-Term View of the Future 40:05 - Financial Services at the Heart of Disruption 41:14 - If AI Replaces Jobs, What Happens to Investing? 42:25 - Entering the Economic Singularity 43:31 - What Happens When AIs Win the Markets? 44:16 - AI's Role in Capital and Markets 45:07 - Will AI Eliminate Human Emotion from Markets? 46:06 - HFT: The Original AI Traders 47:20 - AI and Long-Term Probabilistic Forecasting 48:48 - GPUs, Gaming, and the Origins of AI 50:01 - Nvidia, CUDA, and Wall Street Arms Races 51:04 - Flash Boys and Microwave Trading 51:54 - Will AI Costs Go to Zero? 52:52 - Lower Cost, Higher Usage 53:41 - Robinhood’s UX Won’t Be Just a Chatbox 55:16 - Cortex: AI-Powered Features at Robinhood 56:54 - Tokenization and the Future of Asset Management 57:44 - Crowdsourced, Tokenized Hedge Funds 58:48 - Portability of Tokenized Assets 59:39 - Blockchain as the New Rails of Finance 01:00:09 - The Trump Token and Capital Formation 01:01:00 - Capital Access Unlocks Innovation 01:01:49 - Why Crypto Needs Regulatory Clarity 01:03:17 - From Meme Coins to Real Assets 01:04:17 - Crypto's Path to $100 Trillion? 01:05:15 - The Financial System Will Run on Blockchains 01:06:00 - Platform Layer vs Application Layer Wealth 01:06:29 - AI Raises Money and Launches Tokens 01:07:39 - AIs Creating Software and Capital Formation 01:08:00 - Final Thoughts: A Wild Future Ahead 01:08:20 - When Will Vlad Buy a CryptoPunk? 01:08:51 - Wrapping Up: AI, Crypto, and the Road Ahead
1:09:53

My dear friend, Vlad Tenev, changed the landscape of investing forever! The rise of the retail investor is largely due to Robinhood's success... and in this new Journey Man, we discuss it all... Enjoy! 00:00 - Intro 00:53 - Introducing Vlad Tenev of Robinhood 01:27 - Why Take on Wall Street? 01:54 - Robinhood’s Zero-Fee Origin Story 02:53 - Inspiration from Instagram and Uber 04:24 - Reimagining Trading for Mobile 05:05 - The Challenge of Disrupting Finance 05:42 - Why Everything Is Hard 06:34 - Early Wrong Assumptions 07:42 - Raising Capital with a Small Vision 08:48 - Funding Robinhood on AngelList 09:50 - Early Investors Changed Their Lives 10:38 - The Crypto Explosion Begins 11:07 - Considering a Bitcoin Exchange First 12:17 - Bitcoin’s Early Skepticism and Growth 13:08 - Robinhood Launches Crypto in 2018 14:03 - 2020: Crypto Revenue Surges Overnight 15:04 - The Challenge of Crypto Cyclicality 16:11 - Staffing a Volatile Business 17:10 - Building Robinhood’s Lean Crypto Team 18:46 - Robinhood’s First Crypto Event Coming 19:38 - Where TradFi Meets DeFi 20:34 - Tokenizing Everything 21:09 - Robinhood’s Vision for Crypto + Finance 21:47 - Thoughts on Crypto Options Demand 23:04 - Why Crypto Options Haven’t Taken Off 24:09 - Millennials and the Speculative Economy 25:22 - Democratizing Trading for Everyone 26:08 - Why Buy-and-Hold Doesn’t Work for All 27:15 - Trading vs Investing: A Matter of Wealth 28:01 - Trading as a Skill Anyone Can Build 29:13 - Robinhood’s Role in Onboarding Millions 30:06 - The Fed's Role and Retail Insight 31:03 - The Rise of the Retail Macro Trader 32:17 - Helping Users Succeed with Robinhood Strategies 33:35 - Power of Community and the Hive Mind 34:55 - Will AI Disrupt Community Too? 36:14 - Technological Waves and Investor Opportunity 37:10 - Human Purpose in an AI World 37:52 - Tokenizing Human Connection 38:28 - Creators, Platforms, and Future-Proofing 39:26 - Vlad’s Long-Term View of the Future 40:05 - Financial Services at the Heart of Disruption 41:14 - If AI Replaces Jobs, What Happens to Investing? 42:25 - Entering the Economic Singularity 43:31 - What Happens When AIs Win the Markets? 44:16 - AI's Role in Capital and Markets 45:07 - Will AI Eliminate Human Emotion from Markets? 46:06 - HFT: The Original AI Traders 47:20 - AI and Long-Term Probabilistic Forecasting 48:48 - GPUs, Gaming, and the Origins of AI 50:01 - Nvidia, CUDA, and Wall Street Arms Races 51:04 - Flash Boys and Microwave Trading 51:54 - Will AI Costs Go to Zero? 52:52 - Lower Cost, Higher Usage 53:41 - Robinhood’s UX Won’t Be Just a Chatbox 55:16 - Cortex: AI-Powered Features at Robinhood 56:54 - Tokenization and the Future of Asset Management 57:44 - Crowdsourced, Tokenized Hedge Funds 58:48 - Portability of Tokenized Assets 59:39 - Blockchain as the New Rails of Finance 01:00:09 - The Trump Token and Capital Formation 01:01:00 - Capital Access Unlocks Innovation 01:01:49 - Why Crypto Needs Regulatory Clarity 01:03:17 - From Meme Coins to Real Assets 01:04:17 - Crypto's Path to $100 Trillion? 01:05:15 - The Financial System Will Run on Blockchains 01:06:00 - Platform Layer vs Application Layer Wealth 01:06:29 - AI Raises Money and Launches Tokens 01:07:39 - AIs Creating Software and Capital Formation 01:08:00 - Final Thoughts: A Wild Future Ahead 01:08:20 - When Will Vlad Buy a CryptoPunk? 01:08:51 - Wrapping Up: AI, Crypto, and the Road Ahead

Raoul Pal

172,640 views • 1 year ago

🎙️ Power, Money & Control: Mapping the Hidden Architecture of the World Ep. 123 with Simon Dixon Simon Dixon is a geopolitical analyst, Bitcoin OG, and entrepreneur, formerly an investment banker. In this conversation, Simon does a deep dive into the real architecture of power shaping our world, unpacking how financial, military, and technological power structures intersect, and why incentives drive global decisions. From his early days in traditional finance to his journey into Bitcoin, Simon shares what he learned about how money is created, how influence is exercised, how power compromises, and why many leaders operate within larger systems they don’t fully control. We explore the difference between reforming the system and exiting it, the role of sovereignty, sovereign wealth and debt, how media and markets shape narratives, and why Simon sees Bitcoin and self-custody as tools for individual sovereignty. This is a wide-ranging discussion about power, truth, responsibility, and the practical paths toward greater independence in a highly controlled, corrupted world. → Please like, comment, share & follow — to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 02:05 - Simon's Backstory & Life Mission: Follow the Money & Uncover Forces Shaping the World 11:02 - Ad-Break: Ledn & Trezor 12:40 - Markets Extract Wealth from the Masses 14:44 - War Is Actually a Business Plan 20:55 - From Corporate Career to Teaching About Money 23:30 - Positive Money & Monetary Reform Community 27:27 - Deciding to Create a Bank! 34:45 - First Bitcoin Investments in Startups 39:19 - Simon's Take on Bitcoin Startups & Investing in Them 49:01 - Who Controls the World? Simon's Framework of Financial, Military & Tech Industrial Complexes 55:59 - BlackRock's 20,000 Board Seats Control Every Public Company 1:00:50 - Trump Administration: PayPal Mafia, Stablecoins & AI 1:09:05 - Sovereignty on All Levels: Country, Corporate, Community, Individual 1:09:30 - Ad-Break: Abundant Mines & New Totalitarian Order Conference 1:18:16 - Financial Industrial Complex Dumping the Dollar 1:24:24 - Epstein: Why Were The Files Released Now, How Compromising Works? 1:29:19 - Who's Compromised in the Bitcoin Industry? 1:31:49 - The Spiritual Battle of Good & Evil, The Celsius Scam 1:40:51 - October 7th, Israel, Middle East & Geopolitical Interests 2:08:07 - Will Israel & Palestine Be Economically Vassalized by GCC? What Will The New World Order Look Like? 2:13:26 - Holding Nuanced Complex Realities & Final Thoughts
2:17:46

🎙️ Power, Money & Control: Mapping the Hidden Architecture of the World Ep. 123 with Simon Dixon Simon Dixon is a geopolitical analyst, Bitcoin OG, and entrepreneur, formerly an investment banker. In this conversation, Simon does a deep dive into the real architecture of power shaping our world, unpacking how financial, military, and technological power structures intersect, and why incentives drive global decisions. From his early days in traditional finance to his journey into Bitcoin, Simon shares what he learned about how money is created, how influence is exercised, how power compromises, and why many leaders operate within larger systems they don’t fully control. We explore the difference between reforming the system and exiting it, the role of sovereignty, sovereign wealth and debt, how media and markets shape narratives, and why Simon sees Bitcoin and self-custody as tools for individual sovereignty. This is a wide-ranging discussion about power, truth, responsibility, and the practical paths toward greater independence in a highly controlled, corrupted world. → Please like, comment, share & follow — to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 02:05 - Simon's Backstory & Life Mission: Follow the Money & Uncover Forces Shaping the World 11:02 - Ad-Break: Ledn & Trezor 12:40 - Markets Extract Wealth from the Masses 14:44 - War Is Actually a Business Plan 20:55 - From Corporate Career to Teaching About Money 23:30 - Positive Money & Monetary Reform Community 27:27 - Deciding to Create a Bank! 34:45 - First Bitcoin Investments in Startups 39:19 - Simon's Take on Bitcoin Startups & Investing in Them 49:01 - Who Controls the World? Simon's Framework of Financial, Military & Tech Industrial Complexes 55:59 - BlackRock's 20,000 Board Seats Control Every Public Company 1:00:50 - Trump Administration: PayPal Mafia, Stablecoins & AI 1:09:05 - Sovereignty on All Levels: Country, Corporate, Community, Individual 1:09:30 - Ad-Break: Abundant Mines & New Totalitarian Order Conference 1:18:16 - Financial Industrial Complex Dumping the Dollar 1:24:24 - Epstein: Why Were The Files Released Now, How Compromising Works? 1:29:19 - Who's Compromised in the Bitcoin Industry? 1:31:49 - The Spiritual Battle of Good & Evil, The Celsius Scam 1:40:51 - October 7th, Israel, Middle East & Geopolitical Interests 2:08:07 - Will Israel & Palestine Be Economically Vassalized by GCC? What Will The New World Order Look Like? 2:13:26 - Holding Nuanced Complex Realities & Final Thoughts

Efrat Fenigson

48,912 views • 6 months ago

Here are the 357 sexual predators who voted to hide their own rapes and sexual assaults from the American people at taxpayers’ expense. 182 Democrats. 175 Republicans. Think about that for a minute: 357 out of 435 members of the United States House of Representatives. Every name on this list should be on billboards across the country. The predator—Hakeem Jeffries led the way. 357 Yea Votes (H.Res. 1100 – Refer to Committee): 1.Hakeem Jeffries — NY 2.Alma Adams — NC 3.Robert Aderholt — AL 4.Pete Aguilar — CA 5.Mark Alford — MO 6.Rick Allen — GA 7.Gabe Amo — RI 8.Mark Amodei — NV 9.Yassamin Ansari — AZ 10.Jodey Arrington — TX 11.Jake Auchincloss — MA 12.Brian Babin — TX 13.Don Bacon — NE 14.Troy Balderson — OH 15.Becca Balint — VT 16.Andy Barr — KY 17.Nanette Barragán — CA 18.Michael Baumgartner — WA 19.Joyce Beatty — OH 20.Nick Begich — AK 21.Wesley Bell — MO 22.Cliff Bentz — OR 23.Ami Bera — CA 24.Don Beyer — VA 25.Stephanie Bice — OK 26.Andy Biggs — AZ 27.Gus Bilirakis — FL 28.Sanford Bishop — GA 29.Mike Bost — IL 30.Brendan Boyle — PA 31.Josh Brecheen — OK 32.Robert Bresnahan — PA 33.Shontel Brown — OH 34.Julia Brownley — CA 35.Vern Buchanan — FL 36.Nikki Budzinski — IL 37.Janelle Bynum — OR 38.Ken Calvert — CA 39.Salud Carbajal — CA 40.Mike Carey — OH 41.André Carson — IN 42.John Carter — TX 43.Buddy Carter — GA 44.Troy Carter — LA 45.Greg Casar — TX 46.Ed Case — HI 47.Sean Casten — IL 48.Kathy Castor — FL 49.Joaquin Castro — TX 50.Sheila McCormick — FL 51.Judy Chu — CA 52.Juan Ciscomani — AZ 53.Gilbert Cisneros — CA 54. Katherine Clark — MA 55.Yvette Clarke — NY 56.Emanuel Cleaver — MO 57.Ben Cline — VA 58.Michael Cloud — TX 59.James Clyburn — SC 60. Andrew Clyde — GA 61.Steve Cohen — TN 62.Tom Cole — OK 63.Mike Collins — GA 64. Herb Conaway — NJ 65.Jim Costa — CA 66.Joe Courtney — CT 67.Angie Craig — MN 68.Jeff Crank — CO 69.Jasmine Crockett — TX 70.Jason Crow — CO 71.Henry Cuellar — TX 72.Sharice Davids — KS 73.Warren Davidson — OH 74.Danny Davis — IL 75.Monica De La Cruz — TX 76.Madeleine Dean — PA 77.Diana DeGette — CO 78.Rosa DeLauro — CT 79.Suzan DelBene — WA 80. Chris Deluzio — PA 81. Mark DeSaulnier — CA 82. Scott DesJarlais — TN 83. Maxine Dexter — OR 84. Mario Diaz‑Balart — FL 85. Debbie Dingell — MI 86. Lloyd Doggett — TX 87. Neal Dunn — FL 88. Chuck Edwards — NC 89. Sarah Elfreth — MD 90. Jake Ellzey — TX 91. Tom Emmer — MN 92. Adriano Espaillat — NY 93. Ron Estes — KS 94. Dwight Evans — PA 95. Gabe Evans — CO 96. Mike Ezell — MS 97. Pat Fallon — TX 98. Julie Fedorchak — ND 99. Randy Feenstra — IA 100. Cleo Fields — LA 101. Shomari Figures — AL 102.Brad Finstad — MN 103. Michelle Fischbach — MN 104. Scott Fitzgerald — WI 105. Chuck Fleischmann — TN 106. Lizzie Fletcher — TX 107. Mike Flood — NE 108. Vince Fong — CA 109. Bill Foster — IL 110. Valerie Foushee — NC 111. Virginia Foxx — NC 112. Lois Frankel — FL 113. Scott Franklin — FL 114. Laura Friedman — CA 115. Maxwell Frost — FL 116. Russell Fry — SC 117. Russ Fulcher — ID 118. John Garamendi — CA 119. Andrew Garbarino — NY 120. Bob Garcia — CA 121. Garcia — IL 122. Laura Gillen — NY 123. Carlos Gimenez — FL 124. Dan Goldman — NY 125. Craig Goldman — TX 126. Tony Gonzales — TX 127. Lance Gooden — TX 128. Maggie Goodlander — NH 129. Paul Gosar — AZ 130. Josh Gottheimer — NJ 131. Sam Graves — MO 132. Adam Gray — CA 133. Al Green — TX 134. Morgan Griffith — VA 135. Glenn Grothman — WI 136. Michael Guest — MS 137. Brett Guthrie — KY 138. Harriet Hageman — WY 139. Abe Hamadeh — AZ 140. Josh Harder — CA 141. Mike Haridopolos — FL 142. Pat Harrigan — NC 143. Andy Harris — MD 144. Mark Harris — NC 145. Diana Harshbarger — TN 146. Jahana Hayes — CT 147. Kevin Hern — OK 148. Clay Higgins — LA 149. French Hill — AR 150. Jim Himes — CT 1/2
1:16

Here are the 357 sexual predators who voted to hide their own rapes and sexual assaults from the American people at taxpayers’ expense. 182 Democrats. 175 Republicans. Think about that for a minute: 357 out of 435 members of the United States House of Representatives. Every name on this list should be on billboards across the country. The predator—Hakeem Jeffries led the way. 357 Yea Votes (H.Res. 1100 – Refer to Committee): 1.Hakeem Jeffries — NY 2.Alma Adams — NC 3.Robert Aderholt — AL 4.Pete Aguilar — CA 5.Mark Alford — MO 6.Rick Allen — GA 7.Gabe Amo — RI 8.Mark Amodei — NV 9.Yassamin Ansari — AZ 10.Jodey Arrington — TX 11.Jake Auchincloss — MA 12.Brian Babin — TX 13.Don Bacon — NE 14.Troy Balderson — OH 15.Becca Balint — VT 16.Andy Barr — KY 17.Nanette Barragán — CA 18.Michael Baumgartner — WA 19.Joyce Beatty — OH 20.Nick Begich — AK 21.Wesley Bell — MO 22.Cliff Bentz — OR 23.Ami Bera — CA 24.Don Beyer — VA 25.Stephanie Bice — OK 26.Andy Biggs — AZ 27.Gus Bilirakis — FL 28.Sanford Bishop — GA 29.Mike Bost — IL 30.Brendan Boyle — PA 31.Josh Brecheen — OK 32.Robert Bresnahan — PA 33.Shontel Brown — OH 34.Julia Brownley — CA 35.Vern Buchanan — FL 36.Nikki Budzinski — IL 37.Janelle Bynum — OR 38.Ken Calvert — CA 39.Salud Carbajal — CA 40.Mike Carey — OH 41.André Carson — IN 42.John Carter — TX 43.Buddy Carter — GA 44.Troy Carter — LA 45.Greg Casar — TX 46.Ed Case — HI 47.Sean Casten — IL 48.Kathy Castor — FL 49.Joaquin Castro — TX 50.Sheila McCormick — FL 51.Judy Chu — CA 52.Juan Ciscomani — AZ 53.Gilbert Cisneros — CA 54. Katherine Clark — MA 55.Yvette Clarke — NY 56.Emanuel Cleaver — MO 57.Ben Cline — VA 58.Michael Cloud — TX 59.James Clyburn — SC 60. Andrew Clyde — GA 61.Steve Cohen — TN 62.Tom Cole — OK 63.Mike Collins — GA 64. Herb Conaway — NJ 65.Jim Costa — CA 66.Joe Courtney — CT 67.Angie Craig — MN 68.Jeff Crank — CO 69.Jasmine Crockett — TX 70.Jason Crow — CO 71.Henry Cuellar — TX 72.Sharice Davids — KS 73.Warren Davidson — OH 74.Danny Davis — IL 75.Monica De La Cruz — TX 76.Madeleine Dean — PA 77.Diana DeGette — CO 78.Rosa DeLauro — CT 79.Suzan DelBene — WA 80. Chris Deluzio — PA 81. Mark DeSaulnier — CA 82. Scott DesJarlais — TN 83. Maxine Dexter — OR 84. Mario Diaz‑Balart — FL 85. Debbie Dingell — MI 86. Lloyd Doggett — TX 87. Neal Dunn — FL 88. Chuck Edwards — NC 89. Sarah Elfreth — MD 90. Jake Ellzey — TX 91. Tom Emmer — MN 92. Adriano Espaillat — NY 93. Ron Estes — KS 94. Dwight Evans — PA 95. Gabe Evans — CO 96. Mike Ezell — MS 97. Pat Fallon — TX 98. Julie Fedorchak — ND 99. Randy Feenstra — IA 100. Cleo Fields — LA 101. Shomari Figures — AL 102.Brad Finstad — MN 103. Michelle Fischbach — MN 104. Scott Fitzgerald — WI 105. Chuck Fleischmann — TN 106. Lizzie Fletcher — TX 107. Mike Flood — NE 108. Vince Fong — CA 109. Bill Foster — IL 110. Valerie Foushee — NC 111. Virginia Foxx — NC 112. Lois Frankel — FL 113. Scott Franklin — FL 114. Laura Friedman — CA 115. Maxwell Frost — FL 116. Russell Fry — SC 117. Russ Fulcher — ID 118. John Garamendi — CA 119. Andrew Garbarino — NY 120. Bob Garcia — CA 121. Garcia — IL 122. Laura Gillen — NY 123. Carlos Gimenez — FL 124. Dan Goldman — NY 125. Craig Goldman — TX 126. Tony Gonzales — TX 127. Lance Gooden — TX 128. Maggie Goodlander — NH 129. Paul Gosar — AZ 130. Josh Gottheimer — NJ 131. Sam Graves — MO 132. Adam Gray — CA 133. Al Green — TX 134. Morgan Griffith — VA 135. Glenn Grothman — WI 136. Michael Guest — MS 137. Brett Guthrie — KY 138. Harriet Hageman — WY 139. Abe Hamadeh — AZ 140. Josh Harder — CA 141. Mike Haridopolos — FL 142. Pat Harrigan — NC 143. Andy Harris — MD 144. Mark Harris — NC 145. Diana Harshbarger — TN 146. Jahana Hayes — CT 147. Kevin Hern — OK 148. Clay Higgins — LA 149. French Hill — AR 150. Jim Himes — CT 1/2

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

405,583 views • 5 months ago

Ref: GSH/XX/CXA/Awdal_SO_05 Date: 28/12/2025 To: Maxamed Ali Abdi To: Ahmed Baree To: Abubakar Abdirahman good To: Mohamed Abib To: Ali Hamud Jibril To: Abdirashid Hassan Mataan Subject: Notice of Criminal Liability for Threats, Incitement, and Anticipated Violence Against Civilians in Awdal Region This letter serves as a final, formal, and irrevocable notice that you are being placed on record as individuals who have knowingly, deliberately, and unlawfully threatened civilians of the Awdal Region, incited violence against peaceful youth, intimidated families through fear of armed retaliation, and falsely claimed authority over the lives and security of a civilian population over which you possess absolutely no legal, constitutional, or moral mandate. From this moment forward, no claim of ignorance, misunderstanding, political necessity, or obedience to orders will be available to you as a defense. You all have openly threatened Awdal youth for exercising their lawful right to oppose illegal political acts imposed by a one-tribe secessionist regime based in Hargeisa. You all have warned parents that failure to “control” their children will result in swift and violent action by militias. You all have claimed dominion over Awdal as though it has conquered territory and its people’s disposable subjects. These statements and actions constitute direct and public incitement to violence, collective punishment, and criminal intimidation. They are crimes under Somali law and grave violations under international law. Your conduct is not occurring in a vacuum. It is part of an organized and externally directed operation ordered by the leadership of the one secessionist administration in Hargeisa, whose objective is to forcibly manufacture political consent in Awdal for Israel’s illegal recognition by staging coerced celebrations and suppressing dissent through fear. This is not politics. This is coercion. It is persecution. It is the criminalization of identity and conscience. Awdal has categorically rejected these acts, and no amount of intimidation will change the historical, moral, and political position of its people, who have consistently and independently stood in solidarity with the Palestinian people and rejected the use of their land as a tool for foreign military or geopolitical agendas against Yemen people. This document constitutes a FORMAL LEGAL NOTICE, CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER, and RECORD OF PRIOR WARNING, issued for the purpose of establishing: Individual criminal intent (mens rea) Advance knowledge and foreseeability of harm Personal, joint, and command responsibility This notice is intended for future submission as evidence before: The International Criminal Court (ICC) The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) UN Special Procedures, including Special Rapporteurs on: Extrajudicial executions Freedom of assembly Human rights defenders You all are further notified that your threats are issued in the shadow of already documented mass atrocities committed against civilians in Borama between 4 and 6 December by the one tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa. Those killings are under active legal preparation for international submission. Any further harm inflicted upon Awdal civilians will be treated as a continuation of the same criminal enterprise. The doctrine of continuing crimes will apply. Your names, statements, communications, and actions are being preserved as evidence. This notice itself is being preserved as proof of prior knowledge, intent, and foreseeability of harm. Let’s not misunderstand. You all do not rule Awdal. You all do not speak to its people. You do not possess authority over their lives. Any attempt to impose illegal celebrations, deploy militias, or spill blood in Awdal will be met not with silence, not with fear, but with relentless legal pursuit. If a single Awdal citizen is harmed, detained, disappeared, or killed as a result of your actions or your incitement, each of you will be individually named and pursued before international human-rights and criminal forums. Responsibility will be personal. Consequences will be permanent. This letter constitutes a final cease-and-desist demand. Any continuation of threats, intimidation, or preparation for violence after receipt of this notice will be treated as willful persistence in criminal conduct. All legal rights are expressly reserved. No further warning will be issued. Issued without intermediaries, without equivocation, and without fear with following international laws violated: A. Under Article 25(3) and Article 28 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, liability extends to: Direct perpetrators Those who order, solicit, induce, aid, abet, or otherwise assist Civilian or de facto leaders exercising effective control B. International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) Article 7(1) – Crimes against humanity (murder, persecution, other inhumane acts) Article 7(2)(a) – Attack directed against a civilian population Article 25(3) (b–d) – Ordering, soliciting, aiding and abetting Article 28 – Command or superior responsibility C. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Article 4 – Right to life and integrity of the person Article 5 – Prohibition of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment Article 11 – Right to peaceful assembly Article 12 – Freedom of movement and residence D. United Nations Standards ICCPR Article 6 – Right to life ICCPR Article 19 & 21 – Freedom of expression and peaceful assembly UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms – Absolute prohibition of force against peaceful civilians UN Framework on Atrocity Prevention – Early warning indicators and duty to prevent escalation Nothing in this notice constitutes a waiver of further civil, criminal, or international remedies. Respectfully, 📷 Dr. Abdillahi Hashi Abib - BA, MA, MASc, Ph.D Member of Foreign Affairs Committee Leader of Accountability and Transparency Caucus The House of People of the Federal Republic of Somalia E: dheemaal@yahoo.com W: + 1-571-436-7586 Prime Minister of Israel Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye Recep Tayyip Erdoğan تميم بن حمد محمد بن زايد GOLAHA SHACABKA JFS House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority Donald J. Trump Department of State Speaker Mike Johnson Susie Wiles Hassan Sheikh Mohamud Villa Somalia Hamza Abdi Barre Sheikh Adan Mohamed Nur Madobe Somali Embassy-Qatar🇸🇴 وزارة الخارجية UAE in Somalia Chinese Embassy in Somalia Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 U.S. Embassy Mogadishu, Somalia EU Delegation Somalia Italy in Somalia UNSOM Türkiye in Somalia UNDP Somalia World Bank Africa IMF Africa Canada in Kenya, Somalia and Uganda Embassy of Switzerland in Nairobi قناة الجزيرة Al Jazeera English العربية سكاي نيوز عربية almayadeen Asharq News الشرق للأخبار TRT العربية قناة الإخبارية وكالة أنباء الإمارات القدس العربي AlqudsAlarabi Ynet Global ידיעות אחרונות Haaretz הארץ Haaretz הארץcom ישראל היום החדשות - N12 חדשות 13 The Times of Israel The Jerusalem Post Ynet Global
3:57

Ref: GSH/XX/CXA/Awdal_SO_05 Date: 28/12/2025 To: Maxamed Ali Abdi To: Ahmed Baree To: Abubakar Abdirahman good To: Mohamed Abib To: Ali Hamud Jibril To: Abdirashid Hassan Mataan Subject: Notice of Criminal Liability for Threats, Incitement, and Anticipated Violence Against Civilians in Awdal Region This letter serves as a final, formal, and irrevocable notice that you are being placed on record as individuals who have knowingly, deliberately, and unlawfully threatened civilians of the Awdal Region, incited violence against peaceful youth, intimidated families through fear of armed retaliation, and falsely claimed authority over the lives and security of a civilian population over which you possess absolutely no legal, constitutional, or moral mandate. From this moment forward, no claim of ignorance, misunderstanding, political necessity, or obedience to orders will be available to you as a defense. You all have openly threatened Awdal youth for exercising their lawful right to oppose illegal political acts imposed by a one-tribe secessionist regime based in Hargeisa. You all have warned parents that failure to “control” their children will result in swift and violent action by militias. You all have claimed dominion over Awdal as though it has conquered territory and its people’s disposable subjects. These statements and actions constitute direct and public incitement to violence, collective punishment, and criminal intimidation. They are crimes under Somali law and grave violations under international law. Your conduct is not occurring in a vacuum. It is part of an organized and externally directed operation ordered by the leadership of the one secessionist administration in Hargeisa, whose objective is to forcibly manufacture political consent in Awdal for Israel’s illegal recognition by staging coerced celebrations and suppressing dissent through fear. This is not politics. This is coercion. It is persecution. It is the criminalization of identity and conscience. Awdal has categorically rejected these acts, and no amount of intimidation will change the historical, moral, and political position of its people, who have consistently and independently stood in solidarity with the Palestinian people and rejected the use of their land as a tool for foreign military or geopolitical agendas against Yemen people. This document constitutes a FORMAL LEGAL NOTICE, CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER, and RECORD OF PRIOR WARNING, issued for the purpose of establishing: Individual criminal intent (mens rea) Advance knowledge and foreseeability of harm Personal, joint, and command responsibility This notice is intended for future submission as evidence before: The International Criminal Court (ICC) The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) UN Special Procedures, including Special Rapporteurs on: Extrajudicial executions Freedom of assembly Human rights defenders You all are further notified that your threats are issued in the shadow of already documented mass atrocities committed against civilians in Borama between 4 and 6 December by the one tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa. Those killings are under active legal preparation for international submission. Any further harm inflicted upon Awdal civilians will be treated as a continuation of the same criminal enterprise. The doctrine of continuing crimes will apply. Your names, statements, communications, and actions are being preserved as evidence. This notice itself is being preserved as proof of prior knowledge, intent, and foreseeability of harm. Let’s not misunderstand. You all do not rule Awdal. You all do not speak to its people. You do not possess authority over their lives. Any attempt to impose illegal celebrations, deploy militias, or spill blood in Awdal will be met not with silence, not with fear, but with relentless legal pursuit. If a single Awdal citizen is harmed, detained, disappeared, or killed as a result of your actions or your incitement, each of you will be individually named and pursued before international human-rights and criminal forums. Responsibility will be personal. Consequences will be permanent. This letter constitutes a final cease-and-desist demand. Any continuation of threats, intimidation, or preparation for violence after receipt of this notice will be treated as willful persistence in criminal conduct. All legal rights are expressly reserved. No further warning will be issued. Issued without intermediaries, without equivocation, and without fear with following international laws violated: A. Under Article 25(3) and Article 28 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, liability extends to: Direct perpetrators Those who order, solicit, induce, aid, abet, or otherwise assist Civilian or de facto leaders exercising effective control B. International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) Article 7(1) – Crimes against humanity (murder, persecution, other inhumane acts) Article 7(2)(a) – Attack directed against a civilian population Article 25(3) (b–d) – Ordering, soliciting, aiding and abetting Article 28 – Command or superior responsibility C. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights Article 4 – Right to life and integrity of the person Article 5 – Prohibition of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment Article 11 – Right to peaceful assembly Article 12 – Freedom of movement and residence D. United Nations Standards ICCPR Article 6 – Right to life ICCPR Article 19 & 21 – Freedom of expression and peaceful assembly UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms – Absolute prohibition of force against peaceful civilians UN Framework on Atrocity Prevention – Early warning indicators and duty to prevent escalation Nothing in this notice constitutes a waiver of further civil, criminal, or international remedies. Respectfully, 📷 Dr. Abdillahi Hashi Abib - BA, MA, MASc, Ph.D Member of Foreign Affairs Committee Leader of Accountability and Transparency Caucus The House of People of the Federal Republic of Somalia E: [email protected] W: + 1-571-436-7586 Prime Minister of Israel Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye Recep Tayyip Erdoğan تميم بن حمد محمد بن زايد GOLAHA SHACABKA JFS House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority Donald J. Trump Department of State Speaker Mike Johnson Susie Wiles Hassan Sheikh Mohamud Villa Somalia Hamza Abdi Barre Sheikh Adan Mohamed Nur Madobe Somali Embassy-Qatar🇸🇴 وزارة الخارجية UAE in Somalia Chinese Embassy in Somalia Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 U.S. Embassy Mogadishu, Somalia EU Delegation Somalia Italy in Somalia UNSOM Türkiye in Somalia UNDP Somalia World Bank Africa IMF Africa Canada in Kenya, Somalia and Uganda Embassy of Switzerland in Nairobi قناة الجزيرة Al Jazeera English العربية سكاي نيوز عربية almayadeen Asharq News الشرق للأخبار TRT العربية قناة الإخبارية وكالة أنباء الإمارات القدس العربي AlqudsAlarabi Ynet Global ידיעות אחרונות Haaretz הארץ Haaretz הארץcom ישראל היום החדשות - N12 חדשות 13 The Times of Israel The Jerusalem Post Ynet Global

MP Dr Abdillahi Hashi Abib

12,976 views • 8 months ago

The world of writing has changed forever. AI is getting really good, really fast. ChatGPT is already a better writer than most humans and some professional writers. So, what’s the future of writing? 18 thoughts from Tyler Cowen: 1) Don't let AI smooth out your idiosyncrasies. Let your writing stay weird and uniquely yours. 2) Generic content is dying and the burden is on you as the writer to be distinctive. 3) The more personal your writing becomes, the more future-proof it is. Nobody wants to read memoirs from AI, even if they're technically "better." 4) Use AI as your secondary literature when you read — not just for quick answers, but as a thinking companion. As Tyler puts it, "I'll keep on asking the AI: 'What do you think of chapter two? What happened there? What are some puzzles?' It just gets me thinking... and I'm smarter about the thing in the final analysis." 5) Hallucinations aren't the crisis everyone makes them out to be. No matter the source, if you're going to use a piece of information, you should double-check it. This is true for both books and AI. 6) Secrets will become more valuable in an AI-driven world. 7) One way to use AI as a writer is to research fields you aren't as familiar with before you start writing about them. Tyler said: "I just wrote a column about declassifying classified documents. I don't know that law very well. I asked the AI for a lot of background... now I feel like I'm not an idiot on the topic." 8) AI changes what books are even worth writing. "Predictive books and books about the near future. They don't make sense to write anymore." 9) Editing trick: Try running your writing through AI and asking what some people might find obnoxious. It’s a surprisingly powerful editing trick. 10) When prompting AI, put humans out of your mind and imagine you're talking to an alien or a non-human animal. 11) Many of the most significant AI advancements are likely happening behind closed doors. For example, I hear that Google allows employees to use Gemini with virtually unlimited context windows. 12) What possibilities do large context windows open up? Researchers will be able to load entire regulatory frameworks, historical archives, or massive datasets like "tax records from Renaissance Florence" into a single query. 13) The rate of AI improvement matters more than its current capabilities. As Tyler puts it, "This is the worst they will ever be" is key to understanding their trajectory. "A lot of people don't get that. They're impressed by what they see in the moment, but they don't understand the rate of improvement." 14) The best way to appreciate the current rate of improvement is to use the latest models. 15) Being non-technical can sometimes be an advantage when thinking about AI. Here’s Tyler: "If you're not focused on the technical side, you will see other things more clearly... You just focus on what is this actually good for? And not, am I impressed by all the neat bells and whistles on this advance with AI?" 16) How Tyler uses AI to prep for podcast interviews: Don't waste time asking AI for generic interview questions or broad topics. Tyler says that's the worst question you can ask an AI. It’s “too normy.” Instead, ask specific questions about historical examples and get context. Then, let your own creative questions emerge. 17) Your relationship with mentors and peers becomes more crucial, not less, in an AI world. "Two pieces of general advice with or without AI in the world." Tyler says: "Get more and better mentors and work every day at improving the quality of your peer network." 18) The divide between AI and humans creates a striking paradox. As Tyler puts it: "On one hand the AIs are getting so much better, so learn how to use the AIs. On the other hand, the AIs are getting so much better, so invest in these other things that aren't AI—pure networks. You've gotta do both." I've shared the full conversation with tylercowen below. In the replies, I've also linked to a full transcript and relevant links to YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts if you want to listen there. And if you want a bite-size entry to the episode, I've shared some clips in the replies too.
1:09:02

The world of writing has changed forever. AI is getting really good, really fast. ChatGPT is already a better writer than most humans and some professional writers. So, what’s the future of writing? 18 thoughts from Tyler Cowen: 1) Don't let AI smooth out your idiosyncrasies. Let your writing stay weird and uniquely yours. 2) Generic content is dying and the burden is on you as the writer to be distinctive. 3) The more personal your writing becomes, the more future-proof it is. Nobody wants to read memoirs from AI, even if they're technically "better." 4) Use AI as your secondary literature when you read — not just for quick answers, but as a thinking companion. As Tyler puts it, "I'll keep on asking the AI: 'What do you think of chapter two? What happened there? What are some puzzles?' It just gets me thinking... and I'm smarter about the thing in the final analysis." 5) Hallucinations aren't the crisis everyone makes them out to be. No matter the source, if you're going to use a piece of information, you should double-check it. This is true for both books and AI. 6) Secrets will become more valuable in an AI-driven world. 7) One way to use AI as a writer is to research fields you aren't as familiar with before you start writing about them. Tyler said: "I just wrote a column about declassifying classified documents. I don't know that law very well. I asked the AI for a lot of background... now I feel like I'm not an idiot on the topic." 8) AI changes what books are even worth writing. "Predictive books and books about the near future. They don't make sense to write anymore." 9) Editing trick: Try running your writing through AI and asking what some people might find obnoxious. It’s a surprisingly powerful editing trick. 10) When prompting AI, put humans out of your mind and imagine you're talking to an alien or a non-human animal. 11) Many of the most significant AI advancements are likely happening behind closed doors. For example, I hear that Google allows employees to use Gemini with virtually unlimited context windows. 12) What possibilities do large context windows open up? Researchers will be able to load entire regulatory frameworks, historical archives, or massive datasets like "tax records from Renaissance Florence" into a single query. 13) The rate of AI improvement matters more than its current capabilities. As Tyler puts it, "This is the worst they will ever be" is key to understanding their trajectory. "A lot of people don't get that. They're impressed by what they see in the moment, but they don't understand the rate of improvement." 14) The best way to appreciate the current rate of improvement is to use the latest models. 15) Being non-technical can sometimes be an advantage when thinking about AI. Here’s Tyler: "If you're not focused on the technical side, you will see other things more clearly... You just focus on what is this actually good for? And not, am I impressed by all the neat bells and whistles on this advance with AI?" 16) How Tyler uses AI to prep for podcast interviews: Don't waste time asking AI for generic interview questions or broad topics. Tyler says that's the worst question you can ask an AI. It’s “too normy.” Instead, ask specific questions about historical examples and get context. Then, let your own creative questions emerge. 17) Your relationship with mentors and peers becomes more crucial, not less, in an AI world. "Two pieces of general advice with or without AI in the world." Tyler says: "Get more and better mentors and work every day at improving the quality of your peer network." 18) The divide between AI and humans creates a striking paradox. As Tyler puts it: "On one hand the AIs are getting so much better, so learn how to use the AIs. On the other hand, the AIs are getting so much better, so invest in these other things that aren't AI—pure networks. You've gotta do both." I've shared the full conversation with tylercowen below. In the replies, I've also linked to a full transcript and relevant links to YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts if you want to listen there. And if you want a bite-size entry to the episode, I've shared some clips in the replies too.

David Perell

175,200 views • 1 year ago

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 views • 1 year ago

🟢GIVEAWAY🟢 Best comments or memes about this whole circus + RT this post. 10 winners will each get $50💎 (For evidence, supporting materials, and context, read both articles and watch the video included in the article I posted yesterday) Housebets.com & Porchy pay your debts A few people told me they did not fully understand the first article because there were too many moving parts: leaderboard accounts, rewards, weekly dates, monthly bonus, Tequity, game categories, withdrawals, Provably Fair, seed changes, migration, support tickets, ledgers and founder messages. Fair enough. The evidence is already there, and I still recommend reading the full articles and, above all, watching the video, because the video shows the reward system failing live. But this text is the cleaner version: the full story explained in plain English, without assuming the reader knows anything about crypto casinos, leaderboards or lossback systems. From all the evidence I’ve gathered, the Housebets story is not a normal “player lost money” complaint. It looks like a full transparency failure across the whole product: leaderboard, rewards, withdrawals, game categories, Provably Fair / Tequity mapping, support, migration and founder response. Housebets sold itself as a rewards-first casino: public leaderboards, weekly/monthly bonuses, fast withdrawals, VIP treatment and Provably Fair games. But every time I asked for the records behind those systems, snapshots, ledger entries, weekly cycles, GGR/NGR, slider logs, PF seed mapping, Tequity round IDs, withdrawal approval logs, the answer became some version of “forwarded to the relevant department.” This started long before the public dispute. I was not some random angry player who appeared after one bad session. In January I was helping Housebets and giving product feedback. I literally told support on 27 January that I was “testing the website for George,” while already dealing with a non-instant withdrawal and a 100% welcome bonus that had not applied. Support even asked me for “proof about your testing job.” The same chat shows the advertised 100% Welcome Bonus, the bonus not applying, and support saying the withdrawal needed internal confirmation instead of being instant. The welcome bonus issue never looked clean. Housebets advertised a 100% Welcome Bonus up to $1,000 on first deposit; I deposited, contacted support, and the bonus did not apply. Then support effectively turned a first-deposit bonus into a second-deposit workaround because the first one had not been applied properly. On 31 January I came back after another deposit and told them the bonus still had not been applied, even though I had already followed support’s instructions. Edward replied that he had “forwarded” the concern to the team. The same 100% welcome bonus was still being advertised in March. By April, the rewards system was already showing serious problems. I had the weekly slider at 100% lossback and told support I had lost money but the weekly did not appear. Jacky said the weekly was generated every Thursday at 00:01 UTC and gave actual internal figures: GGR $6,250, Total Bonus $6,083.99, NGR $168.31. So Housebets clearly had internal calculations when it wanted to explain why something might not pay. But when I later asked for full calculations, those same numbers suddenly became impossible to produce. Then on 18–19 April, the rewards page was bugged and would not let me claim. Support could see a pending weekly bonus of $717.37, but I could not claim it from the UI. Tee said it had been forwarded to the relevant department. That $717.37 later appears in the bonus ledger as Rakeback (20 Apr) 717.37089061, so I am not saying that specific one stayed unpaid forever. The point is worse: already in April, support could see a pending weekly reward while the player-facing reward page did not work. For a casino built around rewards, that is not a small bug. That is the product. In May, the UI and account data kept failing basic trust checks. On 8 May, I deposited 400 USDT; support said it had been credited, but I could not see it, and the proposed fix was to log out, clear cookies and cache. On 16 May, I asked why total deposits and withdrawals had disappeared from the menu; support said the platform was “in continuous evolution.” On 17 May, I asked for my total deposits and withdrawals, and support said they did not have direct access to that consolidated summary and would email it. That full official ledger did not arrive. So when Housebets later defends itself with UI screenshots, remember: this was the same UI where deposits could be credited but invisible, totals disappeared, rewards pages bugged, and support could not access consolidated account totals. Withdrawals were also not what was advertised. On 16 May, I asked why a crypto withdrawal was pending if withdrawals were supposed to be instant. Tee answered: “A few withdrawals require manual approval,” then added, “Our withdrawals are typically instant but…” That matters because a few days later the withdrawal delay became real damage. On 25 May, I told support before a match that I needed the funds to place a time-sensitive bet on another site in less than 20 minutes. I explained I wanted to bet around 60k at odds of 2.55. The withdrawal did not arrive in time. Later I told them the bet won and that I missed around 90k in profit because Housebets took more than two hours despite being warned before the match started. Jacky said he would raise the compensation case to the VIP team. Nobody resolved it. This was not one delayed withdrawal either. In my formal complaint I reconstructed several withdrawal delays: 23 May 02:55 → 08:03, around 5h08m; 25 May 03:05 → 08:09, around 5h04m; 17 May 03:54 → 08:02, around 4h08m; 18 May 04:46 → 08:11, around 3h25m; 16 May 05:23 → 08:12, around 2h49m. That is not “instant withdrawal.” And if later marketing says withdrawals are much faster now, the obvious question is: if this was the faster version, what did slow look like? The Provably Fair / Tequity side was another major issue. On 17 May I asked support how to verify an old Blackjack round. I did not ask for a generic explanation of Provably Fair; I asked where I could see the server seed, client seed, nonce and result for previous games. Support sent me to bet history, mentioned RTP, gave a generic PF explanation and showed the current Dice seed screen. When I said that did not let me verify previous games, they told me to clear cookies/cache. After doing that, I saw a new client seed and nonce 1 even though I had not played with that seed pair. I asked if Housebets changes seeds on every login. Support could not answer and told me to contact VIP. That seed/session behaviour is important. I later recorded video evidence around the seed changing after clearing cookies/cache and asked for the exact mapping: Housebets account ID → Tequity/provider player ID → session/currency context → seed pair → server seed hash → revealed server seed → client seed → nonce/cursor → raw outcome → final result. Housebets cannot sell Provably Fair if the player cannot verify historical bets, and “contact VIP” is not a verification algorithm. On 24 May, I asked for raw verification data for a specific Tequity Blackjack round: Round ID e1648d60-0da1-4433-a5ab-9ae39f5302e3, Blackjack, Tequity, bet amount 11,346 USDT, client seed O3YBZF7LBu, server seed hash starting 712875.... I asked for revealed server seed, nonce, full result JSON, card draw order and verification algorithm. I also asked about an apparent duplicate-card/deck question. Tee replied: “I don’t have the answers to your questions right now, but I’m forwarding your request to the relevant department.” That same day, I asked for a full audit of six Dice bets of 11,400 USDT each, total 68,400 USDT. I requested bet IDs, provider round IDs, roll results, seed data, balance ledger, request/session logs, security logs, retry flags, provider records and a full technical reconciliation. Tee replied: “I will forward this to the relevant department.” So when I asked for raw data, the answer was not data. It was forwarding. Again. There were also many large loss clusters that required reconciliation because of those unresolved PF, Tequity, category, RTP and session questions. In my complaint I listed clusters such as 25 May 02:17–02:54 Blackjack around 169,932 USDT; 16 May 12:31–13:26 Dice around 90,571.92 USDT; 26 May 02:48–03:58 Mines around 89,199 USDT; 24 May 06:20–06:21 Dice at 68,400 USDT; 26 May 00:11–01:41 Blackjack around 59,910 USDT; 25 May 22:51–22:59 Dice around 59,576 USDT; and several more between 40k and 56k. I am not saying every losing cluster proves manipulation by itself. I am saying that when PF mapping, provider logs, RTP/HE, category mapping and seed/session behaviour are unresolved, these sequences need a real reconciliation. The leaderboard is where the story becomes very hard for Housebets to explain. Around 19–20 May, two new accounts, elmourabut and lucasmartirini, appeared and started climbing every day at a vertiginous pace. Not normal slow leaderboard growth. Not a casual player building volume over time. They were created around that period and then started rising with huge wagering in a way that looked extremely unnatural for brand new accounts. By 29 May, I was first on both weekly and monthly leaderboards, and those two accounts were directly behind me with huge volume. In the monthly leaderboard screenshots, I was around $3.33M wagered, while elmourabut was around $1.29M and lucasmartirini around $1.08M. In the weekly leaderboard, I was around $1.096M, while those two accounts were around $635k and $578k. They were not normal accounts sitting at the bottom; they were directly behind me, applying pressure. In my formal complaint I recorded that elmourabut joined on 19 May and lucasmartirini on 20 May, that they showed zero visible withdrawals, large deposits/wagering and significant card-game volume, and I asked Housebets to confirm they were not staff, test, QA, admin, house-controlled, affiliate-controlled, internally funded, promotional, bonus-only or multi-account related accounts. This matters because a leaderboard is not passive. It is gamification. It makes players defend rank. When two new accounts appear behind you with hundreds of thousands or more than a million in volume, you are pressured to keep wagering. In my case, the disputed deposit sequence from 25 May 22:23 to 26 May 02:09 totals 91,168.375326 USDT. That sequence begins with 1,000.00 at 22:23 and continues with repeated deposits until 2,879.148969 at 02:09. The video later shows why those dates matter: there were deposits coming in, no gameplay withdrawal offsetting the sequence, a balance basically at zero, and later a leaderboard prize shown as P/L. I formally asked Housebets to confirm those two leaderboard accounts were real and eligible, and also to preserve wager logs, transaction records, balance adjustment logs, account flags, leaderboard calculation snapshots, support ticket logs, Telegram/email records and internal notes. Edward said he forwarded the request. In the same thread, he added that they were “working on fixing an issue regarding the weekly bonuses,” and then said the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” So the leaderboard issue and the weekly bonus issue are linked in time and support context. After that, Housebets confirmed by email that elmourabut and lucasmartirini were “legitimate and eligible accounts.” That email is the trap door. If they were legitimate and eligible, they should have remained in the leaderboard with their volume. If they were not, Housebets should never have confirmed them as legitimate and eligible. After that confirmation, the accounts disappeared from the leaderboard or stopped appearing in the positions their previous wagering required. I went back to support on 30 May and wrote: “There has been a material post-confirmation leaderboard change involving two accounts that Housebets had already confirmed as legitimate and eligible. I need the exact reason, timestamp, logs, and recalculation basis.” Edward said the matter was flagged and that I could expect a prompt response. I am still waiting for the actual explanation. Why did they disappear? My read is simple: because every hour that passed, there was more evidence around those accounts. They had been created around the same period, they were climbing at a speed that looked anything but human, they showed no visible withdrawals in the data I could see and reported, they appeared to be generating huge volume in unclear game categories, and the games/categories tied to that volume did not even make sense from the player-facing UI. When I started asking what they were actually playing, what Card meant, whether the volume was Tequity / UnOriginals / House Games, what RTP and house edge applied, and where the logs were, the questions became uncomfortable. Keeping those accounts visible became harder than removing them. So they disappeared. The game category issue made the leaderboard even more suspicious. On 30 May, I asked support why my own stats showed almost all my volume under Slots / Tragamonedas when I did not play real slots. I told them: “i dont play 3$ in unoriginals,” “i played all 3M in unoriginals,” and “ive never play slots.” I asked what “Card” was, where that game was, what RTP and house edge it had. Monica said Card was mainly Blackjack, Baccarat and Poker variants. Marcus later said the team was investigating why it showed that I mostly played slots when I had not. He could not give the exact game, RTP, HE, provider, category mapping or contribution logic. That matters because those same unclear categories were connected to leaderboard volume. If the site cannot clearly explain whether volume is Slots, Card, UnOriginals, House Games, Blackjack, Baccarat, Always 9 Baccarat or Tequity, then the leaderboard is not auditable for the player. I even asked which UnOriginals those two accounts were playing, and support told me to look at Live Bets. That is not an answer. I was not asking for gossip; I was asking what exact games generated leaderboard volume, what RTP/HE applied and whether that volume was eligible. There is also an earlier leaderboard-related precedent: Porchy had already told me in February that I would lose leaderboard places if I did not rename, because too many people were messaging support saying the site was not being fair due to my name and it “doesn’t make us look good.” That matters because it suggests leaderboard positioning was not treated as a sacred, untouchable system when public perception was involved. If leaderboard positions can be threatened for image reasons, then later claims that everything is purely automatic deserve scrutiny. Then Porchy made the leaderboard situation worse. Instead of producing logs or snapshots, he later said the leaderboard had “abusers” on it, that they were removed to help other players, and that it never affected me. Later he said they paid every single person, “even these abusers,” then called me “begging for money.” That creates a direct contradiction: Housebets confirmed the accounts as legitimate and eligible, then Porchy referred to leaderboard “abusers.” If they were abusers, why were they confirmed as legitimate and eligible? If they were eligible, why did they disappear? If they never affected me, where are the historical snapshots proving that? Once those accounts disappeared, Housebets paid the leaderboard prizes. On 1 June, the bonus ledger shows two Leaderboard entries: 5,007.46111706 and 1,001.49222341, totaling 6,008.95334047. That part was paid. But then Act Two started: the weekly and monthly rewards did not appear as separate ledger entries. The same bonus ledger shows those two 1 June entries as Leaderboard only, not Monthly Bonus, not Weekly Reload, not Lossback. The weekly timeline is a mess. On 28 May, the dashboard / UI said the weekly bonus was claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC, and the monthly was available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. That same night I told support the weekly had shown as available, then reset to 6 days without paying. Later I sent screenshots and wrote: “1M wagered and 0.2$.” Jacky said he had raised the issue to the technical team. So the weekly failure was reported live, not reconstructed after the fact. The next day, 29 May, Edward said they were fixing an issue regarding weekly bonuses and that the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” Then on 1 June, Spencer said the May weekly bonuses were 7th, 14th, 21st, and then due to migration the weekly moved to Monday, so there was one on the 25th on the new platform. He also said the 25 May weekly covered gameplay from 21–24 May, and that tech was looking at that plus the monthly bonus. The ledger does show a 25 May 02:10 Rakeback entry of 1,996.08334791, which likely corresponds to that 21–24 May weekly. But my major loss sequence starts about 20 hours later, on 25 May at 22:23, and continues until 26 May at 02:09. So the 25 May weekly cannot cover those losses. If weekly was still Thursday, the 25/26 losses should have been in the 28 May weekly. But the bonus ledger on 28 May shows only two tiny Rakeback entries, 0.28373945 and 0.00280958. If weekly moved to Monday because of migration, those losses should have appeared in the next weekly after 25 May. But on 1 June the ledger only shows Leaderboard entries. Then the final video shows the next Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting to 6d 23h. So the same loss sequence appears to fall into no paid weekly cycle. The 4 June support conversation makes this even more ridiculous. After I recorded the weekly reset video, I asked support a very simple question: what were the last weekly dates/cycles? The dashboard / support flow again said weekly bonuses are claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC. Jacky confirmed: “Weekly bonuses can be claimed every Thursday at 00:01 UTC in the Rewards tab,” and added that if not claimed by the following Wednesday at 23:59 UTC, it expires. But when I asked for the exact last four dates, Jacky said he had to check with the relevant department. When I pressed again, he said, “Sorry, As I am only a CS, Let me raise your concerns to relevant department.” I asked whether support did not have the information or simply could not answer. He replied: “Do you have any other concerns?” They use weekly cycles to decide whether to pay, but support cannot explain the weekly cycle. The monthly is missing too. The dashboard / UI said the monthly bonus is based on activity and VIP level from the previous month and is available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. In May I had more than 3,258,023.0829 wagered according to the formal complaint data. I also have proof/video that the monthly slider was set to 50/50. On 1 June, Spencer first told me I had claimed the Monthly Bonus at 1:12am BST around the same time as the monthly leaderboard reward. I immediately said I only received leaderboard prizes. Then Spencer changed the answer: “Our tech team are still actively working on issues regarding the monthly bonuses.” So first the monthly was claimed, then tech was still fixing it. The ledger still shows no Monthly Bonus entry. Housebets then seems to rely on “up overall” as a defence. But the video and ledger show why that does not work. My weekly/monthly profile later showed around +6,008 P/L with 0 deposits, 0 wagered and around 6,008 in bonuses. That number matches exactly the two 1 June Leaderboard payments. So the UI is showing leaderboard rewards as P/L. Then support used “up overall” to say I was not eligible for weekly lossback. That is not a clean lossback calculation. That is using a leaderboard reward as apparent profit to deny a lossback that should be based on actual eligible losses. There were also smaller reward-confusion issues along the way. On 22 May I asked for all pending bonuses,weekly, monthly, rakeback, level-up, anything, and support said the internal team would manually verify whether everything had been credited correctly and email me. On 24 May, I asked about level-up rewards because the reward looked like $3,500 for Pearl; support clarified it was $3,500 total across all Pearl levels, $500 per level. These are not the core issues, but they are part of the same pattern: rewards marketing, unclear UI, manual verification, emails that do not arrive, and players having to chase basic explanations. Then there is the migration. On 25 May, after the delayed withdrawal, missing VIP contact and unresolved issues, support told me my account would be moved to the new platform and that this upgrade would offer a better withdrawal process and fix many issues. Before that migration, I explicitly requested that no account data, internal data, logs, balance history, bonus history, bet history, provider records or pending issues be deleted. The response: “Your request has been relayed to the relevant department.” Again, forwarding. But if the old data is safe, Housebets should provide the old leaderboard snapshots, old weekly states, old bonus logs, old Tequity mapping and old withdrawal approval logs. The founder response did not fix anything. When Porchy finally engaged, he did not provide the records. He framed the settlement request as “so you want $100,000?” and asked whether I needed it or else I was going to post on X. I had already made clear this was not money for silence; I asked for logs, snapshots, withdrawal records, calculations and a counter-calculation if Housebets disagreed. He later referred to “abusers,” told me I was “up overall,” said “You are begging for money,” and suggested I “just do this to casinos.” Still no ledger. Still no weekly calculation. Still no monthly entry. Still no PF/Tequity mapping. Still no leaderboard snapshots. Another player also contacted me with screenshots pointing to similar categories of issues: private deals, leaderboard payout disputes, migration/account merge problems, missing history and a tiny monthly bonus despite claimed losses. I am not using that player’s case as the foundation of my claim without his full ledger, but it matters because it suggests the same type of opacity may not be isolated: private VIP/reward deals, leaderboard eligibility, monthly bonus calculations, migration and unclear history. If Housebets has private deals that affect leaderboard eligibility or rewards, it must explain how those deals interact with public leaderboards. So the overall picture is this: Housebets sold a public leaderboard and rewards system that pressured real wagering. Two new accounts appeared directly behind me with huge volume, were confirmed as legitimate and eligible, then disappeared after I asked for logs and questioned game categories. Housebets could not explain the exact games, RTP, house edge or category mapping behind the volume. The accounts were later framed by Porchy as “abusers,” contradicting the earlier eligibility confirmation. Once Housebets paid me the leaderboard prizes, those prizes were shown as P/L, and that contaminated P/L was then used to claim I was “up overall” and not eligible for lossback. At the same time, my real 25 May 22:23 → 26 May 02:09 loss sequence of 91,168.375326 USDT appears in no clean weekly cycle. The 25 May weekly covered 21–24 May according to Spencer, so it cannot cover that loss sequence. The 28 May weekly showed only tiny Rakeback entries and was already reported as broken. The 1 June ledger shows only Leaderboard entries. The later video shows Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting. And when I ask support for the exact weekly calendar, they cannot answer and send it to the relevant department. The monthly is the same story. The dashboard / UI says it is based on activity and VIP. I had more than 3.25M wagered in May. Spencer first says I claimed it, then says tech is still working on monthly bonuses. The ledger shows no Monthly Bonus. If Housebets says I was not eligible, they need to show the formula, slider history, cycle, GGR/NGR, eligible loss/activity, deductions and ledger result. If they cannot, “not eligible” is just another label. And this opens another can of worms: Tequity / provider configuration. Housebets cannot hide behind “the provider” whenever something goes wrong. The player does not deposit with Tequity. The player does not withdraw from Tequity. The player does not speak to Tequity support. The player does not compete in a Tequity leaderboard. The player plays on Housebets, with a Housebets wallet, Housebets UI, Housebets rewards, Housebets leaderboard and Housebets support. 1/2
22:49

🟢GIVEAWAY🟢 Best comments or memes about this whole circus + RT this post. 10 winners will each get $50💎 (For evidence, supporting materials, and context, read both articles and watch the video included in the article I posted yesterday) Housebets.com & Porchy pay your debts A few people told me they did not fully understand the first article because there were too many moving parts: leaderboard accounts, rewards, weekly dates, monthly bonus, Tequity, game categories, withdrawals, Provably Fair, seed changes, migration, support tickets, ledgers and founder messages. Fair enough. The evidence is already there, and I still recommend reading the full articles and, above all, watching the video, because the video shows the reward system failing live. But this text is the cleaner version: the full story explained in plain English, without assuming the reader knows anything about crypto casinos, leaderboards or lossback systems. From all the evidence I’ve gathered, the Housebets story is not a normal “player lost money” complaint. It looks like a full transparency failure across the whole product: leaderboard, rewards, withdrawals, game categories, Provably Fair / Tequity mapping, support, migration and founder response. Housebets sold itself as a rewards-first casino: public leaderboards, weekly/monthly bonuses, fast withdrawals, VIP treatment and Provably Fair games. But every time I asked for the records behind those systems, snapshots, ledger entries, weekly cycles, GGR/NGR, slider logs, PF seed mapping, Tequity round IDs, withdrawal approval logs, the answer became some version of “forwarded to the relevant department.” This started long before the public dispute. I was not some random angry player who appeared after one bad session. In January I was helping Housebets and giving product feedback. I literally told support on 27 January that I was “testing the website for George,” while already dealing with a non-instant withdrawal and a 100% welcome bonus that had not applied. Support even asked me for “proof about your testing job.” The same chat shows the advertised 100% Welcome Bonus, the bonus not applying, and support saying the withdrawal needed internal confirmation instead of being instant. The welcome bonus issue never looked clean. Housebets advertised a 100% Welcome Bonus up to $1,000 on first deposit; I deposited, contacted support, and the bonus did not apply. Then support effectively turned a first-deposit bonus into a second-deposit workaround because the first one had not been applied properly. On 31 January I came back after another deposit and told them the bonus still had not been applied, even though I had already followed support’s instructions. Edward replied that he had “forwarded” the concern to the team. The same 100% welcome bonus was still being advertised in March. By April, the rewards system was already showing serious problems. I had the weekly slider at 100% lossback and told support I had lost money but the weekly did not appear. Jacky said the weekly was generated every Thursday at 00:01 UTC and gave actual internal figures: GGR $6,250, Total Bonus $6,083.99, NGR $168.31. So Housebets clearly had internal calculations when it wanted to explain why something might not pay. But when I later asked for full calculations, those same numbers suddenly became impossible to produce. Then on 18–19 April, the rewards page was bugged and would not let me claim. Support could see a pending weekly bonus of $717.37, but I could not claim it from the UI. Tee said it had been forwarded to the relevant department. That $717.37 later appears in the bonus ledger as Rakeback (20 Apr) 717.37089061, so I am not saying that specific one stayed unpaid forever. The point is worse: already in April, support could see a pending weekly reward while the player-facing reward page did not work. For a casino built around rewards, that is not a small bug. That is the product. In May, the UI and account data kept failing basic trust checks. On 8 May, I deposited 400 USDT; support said it had been credited, but I could not see it, and the proposed fix was to log out, clear cookies and cache. On 16 May, I asked why total deposits and withdrawals had disappeared from the menu; support said the platform was “in continuous evolution.” On 17 May, I asked for my total deposits and withdrawals, and support said they did not have direct access to that consolidated summary and would email it. That full official ledger did not arrive. So when Housebets later defends itself with UI screenshots, remember: this was the same UI where deposits could be credited but invisible, totals disappeared, rewards pages bugged, and support could not access consolidated account totals. Withdrawals were also not what was advertised. On 16 May, I asked why a crypto withdrawal was pending if withdrawals were supposed to be instant. Tee answered: “A few withdrawals require manual approval,” then added, “Our withdrawals are typically instant but…” That matters because a few days later the withdrawal delay became real damage. On 25 May, I told support before a match that I needed the funds to place a time-sensitive bet on another site in less than 20 minutes. I explained I wanted to bet around 60k at odds of 2.55. The withdrawal did not arrive in time. Later I told them the bet won and that I missed around 90k in profit because Housebets took more than two hours despite being warned before the match started. Jacky said he would raise the compensation case to the VIP team. Nobody resolved it. This was not one delayed withdrawal either. In my formal complaint I reconstructed several withdrawal delays: 23 May 02:55 → 08:03, around 5h08m; 25 May 03:05 → 08:09, around 5h04m; 17 May 03:54 → 08:02, around 4h08m; 18 May 04:46 → 08:11, around 3h25m; 16 May 05:23 → 08:12, around 2h49m. That is not “instant withdrawal.” And if later marketing says withdrawals are much faster now, the obvious question is: if this was the faster version, what did slow look like? The Provably Fair / Tequity side was another major issue. On 17 May I asked support how to verify an old Blackjack round. I did not ask for a generic explanation of Provably Fair; I asked where I could see the server seed, client seed, nonce and result for previous games. Support sent me to bet history, mentioned RTP, gave a generic PF explanation and showed the current Dice seed screen. When I said that did not let me verify previous games, they told me to clear cookies/cache. After doing that, I saw a new client seed and nonce 1 even though I had not played with that seed pair. I asked if Housebets changes seeds on every login. Support could not answer and told me to contact VIP. That seed/session behaviour is important. I later recorded video evidence around the seed changing after clearing cookies/cache and asked for the exact mapping: Housebets account ID → Tequity/provider player ID → session/currency context → seed pair → server seed hash → revealed server seed → client seed → nonce/cursor → raw outcome → final result. Housebets cannot sell Provably Fair if the player cannot verify historical bets, and “contact VIP” is not a verification algorithm. On 24 May, I asked for raw verification data for a specific Tequity Blackjack round: Round ID e1648d60-0da1-4433-a5ab-9ae39f5302e3, Blackjack, Tequity, bet amount 11,346 USDT, client seed O3YBZF7LBu, server seed hash starting 712875.... I asked for revealed server seed, nonce, full result JSON, card draw order and verification algorithm. I also asked about an apparent duplicate-card/deck question. Tee replied: “I don’t have the answers to your questions right now, but I’m forwarding your request to the relevant department.” That same day, I asked for a full audit of six Dice bets of 11,400 USDT each, total 68,400 USDT. I requested bet IDs, provider round IDs, roll results, seed data, balance ledger, request/session logs, security logs, retry flags, provider records and a full technical reconciliation. Tee replied: “I will forward this to the relevant department.” So when I asked for raw data, the answer was not data. It was forwarding. Again. There were also many large loss clusters that required reconciliation because of those unresolved PF, Tequity, category, RTP and session questions. In my complaint I listed clusters such as 25 May 02:17–02:54 Blackjack around 169,932 USDT; 16 May 12:31–13:26 Dice around 90,571.92 USDT; 26 May 02:48–03:58 Mines around 89,199 USDT; 24 May 06:20–06:21 Dice at 68,400 USDT; 26 May 00:11–01:41 Blackjack around 59,910 USDT; 25 May 22:51–22:59 Dice around 59,576 USDT; and several more between 40k and 56k. I am not saying every losing cluster proves manipulation by itself. I am saying that when PF mapping, provider logs, RTP/HE, category mapping and seed/session behaviour are unresolved, these sequences need a real reconciliation. The leaderboard is where the story becomes very hard for Housebets to explain. Around 19–20 May, two new accounts, elmourabut and lucasmartirini, appeared and started climbing every day at a vertiginous pace. Not normal slow leaderboard growth. Not a casual player building volume over time. They were created around that period and then started rising with huge wagering in a way that looked extremely unnatural for brand new accounts. By 29 May, I was first on both weekly and monthly leaderboards, and those two accounts were directly behind me with huge volume. In the monthly leaderboard screenshots, I was around $3.33M wagered, while elmourabut was around $1.29M and lucasmartirini around $1.08M. In the weekly leaderboard, I was around $1.096M, while those two accounts were around $635k and $578k. They were not normal accounts sitting at the bottom; they were directly behind me, applying pressure. In my formal complaint I recorded that elmourabut joined on 19 May and lucasmartirini on 20 May, that they showed zero visible withdrawals, large deposits/wagering and significant card-game volume, and I asked Housebets to confirm they were not staff, test, QA, admin, house-controlled, affiliate-controlled, internally funded, promotional, bonus-only or multi-account related accounts. This matters because a leaderboard is not passive. It is gamification. It makes players defend rank. When two new accounts appear behind you with hundreds of thousands or more than a million in volume, you are pressured to keep wagering. In my case, the disputed deposit sequence from 25 May 22:23 to 26 May 02:09 totals 91,168.375326 USDT. That sequence begins with 1,000.00 at 22:23 and continues with repeated deposits until 2,879.148969 at 02:09. The video later shows why those dates matter: there were deposits coming in, no gameplay withdrawal offsetting the sequence, a balance basically at zero, and later a leaderboard prize shown as P/L. I formally asked Housebets to confirm those two leaderboard accounts were real and eligible, and also to preserve wager logs, transaction records, balance adjustment logs, account flags, leaderboard calculation snapshots, support ticket logs, Telegram/email records and internal notes. Edward said he forwarded the request. In the same thread, he added that they were “working on fixing an issue regarding the weekly bonuses,” and then said the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” So the leaderboard issue and the weekly bonus issue are linked in time and support context. After that, Housebets confirmed by email that elmourabut and lucasmartirini were “legitimate and eligible accounts.” That email is the trap door. If they were legitimate and eligible, they should have remained in the leaderboard with their volume. If they were not, Housebets should never have confirmed them as legitimate and eligible. After that confirmation, the accounts disappeared from the leaderboard or stopped appearing in the positions their previous wagering required. I went back to support on 30 May and wrote: “There has been a material post-confirmation leaderboard change involving two accounts that Housebets had already confirmed as legitimate and eligible. I need the exact reason, timestamp, logs, and recalculation basis.” Edward said the matter was flagged and that I could expect a prompt response. I am still waiting for the actual explanation. Why did they disappear? My read is simple: because every hour that passed, there was more evidence around those accounts. They had been created around the same period, they were climbing at a speed that looked anything but human, they showed no visible withdrawals in the data I could see and reported, they appeared to be generating huge volume in unclear game categories, and the games/categories tied to that volume did not even make sense from the player-facing UI. When I started asking what they were actually playing, what Card meant, whether the volume was Tequity / UnOriginals / House Games, what RTP and house edge applied, and where the logs were, the questions became uncomfortable. Keeping those accounts visible became harder than removing them. So they disappeared. The game category issue made the leaderboard even more suspicious. On 30 May, I asked support why my own stats showed almost all my volume under Slots / Tragamonedas when I did not play real slots. I told them: “i dont play 3$ in unoriginals,” “i played all 3M in unoriginals,” and “ive never play slots.” I asked what “Card” was, where that game was, what RTP and house edge it had. Monica said Card was mainly Blackjack, Baccarat and Poker variants. Marcus later said the team was investigating why it showed that I mostly played slots when I had not. He could not give the exact game, RTP, HE, provider, category mapping or contribution logic. That matters because those same unclear categories were connected to leaderboard volume. If the site cannot clearly explain whether volume is Slots, Card, UnOriginals, House Games, Blackjack, Baccarat, Always 9 Baccarat or Tequity, then the leaderboard is not auditable for the player. I even asked which UnOriginals those two accounts were playing, and support told me to look at Live Bets. That is not an answer. I was not asking for gossip; I was asking what exact games generated leaderboard volume, what RTP/HE applied and whether that volume was eligible. There is also an earlier leaderboard-related precedent: Porchy had already told me in February that I would lose leaderboard places if I did not rename, because too many people were messaging support saying the site was not being fair due to my name and it “doesn’t make us look good.” That matters because it suggests leaderboard positioning was not treated as a sacred, untouchable system when public perception was involved. If leaderboard positions can be threatened for image reasons, then later claims that everything is purely automatic deserve scrutiny. Then Porchy made the leaderboard situation worse. Instead of producing logs or snapshots, he later said the leaderboard had “abusers” on it, that they were removed to help other players, and that it never affected me. Later he said they paid every single person, “even these abusers,” then called me “begging for money.” That creates a direct contradiction: Housebets confirmed the accounts as legitimate and eligible, then Porchy referred to leaderboard “abusers.” If they were abusers, why were they confirmed as legitimate and eligible? If they were eligible, why did they disappear? If they never affected me, where are the historical snapshots proving that? Once those accounts disappeared, Housebets paid the leaderboard prizes. On 1 June, the bonus ledger shows two Leaderboard entries: 5,007.46111706 and 1,001.49222341, totaling 6,008.95334047. That part was paid. But then Act Two started: the weekly and monthly rewards did not appear as separate ledger entries. The same bonus ledger shows those two 1 June entries as Leaderboard only, not Monthly Bonus, not Weekly Reload, not Lossback. The weekly timeline is a mess. On 28 May, the dashboard / UI said the weekly bonus was claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC, and the monthly was available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. That same night I told support the weekly had shown as available, then reset to 6 days without paying. Later I sent screenshots and wrote: “1M wagered and 0.2$.” Jacky said he had raised the issue to the technical team. So the weekly failure was reported live, not reconstructed after the fact. The next day, 29 May, Edward said they were fixing an issue regarding weekly bonuses and that the weekly countdown was “not currently on Thursday evenings.” Then on 1 June, Spencer said the May weekly bonuses were 7th, 14th, 21st, and then due to migration the weekly moved to Monday, so there was one on the 25th on the new platform. He also said the 25 May weekly covered gameplay from 21–24 May, and that tech was looking at that plus the monthly bonus. The ledger does show a 25 May 02:10 Rakeback entry of 1,996.08334791, which likely corresponds to that 21–24 May weekly. But my major loss sequence starts about 20 hours later, on 25 May at 22:23, and continues until 26 May at 02:09. So the 25 May weekly cannot cover those losses. If weekly was still Thursday, the 25/26 losses should have been in the 28 May weekly. But the bonus ledger on 28 May shows only two tiny Rakeback entries, 0.28373945 and 0.00280958. If weekly moved to Monday because of migration, those losses should have appeared in the next weekly after 25 May. But on 1 June the ledger only shows Leaderboard entries. Then the final video shows the next Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting to 6d 23h. So the same loss sequence appears to fall into no paid weekly cycle. The 4 June support conversation makes this even more ridiculous. After I recorded the weekly reset video, I asked support a very simple question: what were the last weekly dates/cycles? The dashboard / support flow again said weekly bonuses are claimable every Thursday at 00:01 UTC. Jacky confirmed: “Weekly bonuses can be claimed every Thursday at 00:01 UTC in the Rewards tab,” and added that if not claimed by the following Wednesday at 23:59 UTC, it expires. But when I asked for the exact last four dates, Jacky said he had to check with the relevant department. When I pressed again, he said, “Sorry, As I am only a CS, Let me raise your concerns to relevant department.” I asked whether support did not have the information or simply could not answer. He replied: “Do you have any other concerns?” They use weekly cycles to decide whether to pay, but support cannot explain the weekly cycle. The monthly is missing too. The dashboard / UI said the monthly bonus is based on activity and VIP level from the previous month and is available on the 1st at 00:01 UTC. In May I had more than 3,258,023.0829 wagered according to the formal complaint data. I also have proof/video that the monthly slider was set to 50/50. On 1 June, Spencer first told me I had claimed the Monthly Bonus at 1:12am BST around the same time as the monthly leaderboard reward. I immediately said I only received leaderboard prizes. Then Spencer changed the answer: “Our tech team are still actively working on issues regarding the monthly bonuses.” So first the monthly was claimed, then tech was still fixing it. The ledger still shows no Monthly Bonus entry. Housebets then seems to rely on “up overall” as a defence. But the video and ledger show why that does not work. My weekly/monthly profile later showed around +6,008 P/L with 0 deposits, 0 wagered and around 6,008 in bonuses. That number matches exactly the two 1 June Leaderboard payments. So the UI is showing leaderboard rewards as P/L. Then support used “up overall” to say I was not eligible for weekly lossback. That is not a clean lossback calculation. That is using a leaderboard reward as apparent profit to deny a lossback that should be based on actual eligible losses. There were also smaller reward-confusion issues along the way. On 22 May I asked for all pending bonuses,weekly, monthly, rakeback, level-up, anything, and support said the internal team would manually verify whether everything had been credited correctly and email me. On 24 May, I asked about level-up rewards because the reward looked like $3,500 for Pearl; support clarified it was $3,500 total across all Pearl levels, $500 per level. These are not the core issues, but they are part of the same pattern: rewards marketing, unclear UI, manual verification, emails that do not arrive, and players having to chase basic explanations. Then there is the migration. On 25 May, after the delayed withdrawal, missing VIP contact and unresolved issues, support told me my account would be moved to the new platform and that this upgrade would offer a better withdrawal process and fix many issues. Before that migration, I explicitly requested that no account data, internal data, logs, balance history, bonus history, bet history, provider records or pending issues be deleted. The response: “Your request has been relayed to the relevant department.” Again, forwarding. But if the old data is safe, Housebets should provide the old leaderboard snapshots, old weekly states, old bonus logs, old Tequity mapping and old withdrawal approval logs. The founder response did not fix anything. When Porchy finally engaged, he did not provide the records. He framed the settlement request as “so you want $100,000?” and asked whether I needed it or else I was going to post on X. I had already made clear this was not money for silence; I asked for logs, snapshots, withdrawal records, calculations and a counter-calculation if Housebets disagreed. He later referred to “abusers,” told me I was “up overall,” said “You are begging for money,” and suggested I “just do this to casinos.” Still no ledger. Still no weekly calculation. Still no monthly entry. Still no PF/Tequity mapping. Still no leaderboard snapshots. Another player also contacted me with screenshots pointing to similar categories of issues: private deals, leaderboard payout disputes, migration/account merge problems, missing history and a tiny monthly bonus despite claimed losses. I am not using that player’s case as the foundation of my claim without his full ledger, but it matters because it suggests the same type of opacity may not be isolated: private VIP/reward deals, leaderboard eligibility, monthly bonus calculations, migration and unclear history. If Housebets has private deals that affect leaderboard eligibility or rewards, it must explain how those deals interact with public leaderboards. So the overall picture is this: Housebets sold a public leaderboard and rewards system that pressured real wagering. Two new accounts appeared directly behind me with huge volume, were confirmed as legitimate and eligible, then disappeared after I asked for logs and questioned game categories. Housebets could not explain the exact games, RTP, house edge or category mapping behind the volume. The accounts were later framed by Porchy as “abusers,” contradicting the earlier eligibility confirmation. Once Housebets paid me the leaderboard prizes, those prizes were shown as P/L, and that contaminated P/L was then used to claim I was “up overall” and not eligible for lossback. At the same time, my real 25 May 22:23 → 26 May 02:09 loss sequence of 91,168.375326 USDT appears in no clean weekly cycle. The 25 May weekly covered 21–24 May according to Spencer, so it cannot cover that loss sequence. The 28 May weekly showed only tiny Rakeback entries and was already reported as broken. The 1 June ledger shows only Leaderboard entries. The later video shows Weekly Reload reaching zero, paying nothing and resetting. And when I ask support for the exact weekly calendar, they cannot answer and send it to the relevant department. The monthly is the same story. The dashboard / UI says it is based on activity and VIP. I had more than 3.25M wagered in May. Spencer first says I claimed it, then says tech is still working on monthly bonuses. The ledger shows no Monthly Bonus. If Housebets says I was not eligible, they need to show the formula, slider history, cycle, GGR/NGR, eligible loss/activity, deductions and ledger result. If they cannot, “not eligible” is just another label. And this opens another can of worms: Tequity / provider configuration. Housebets cannot hide behind “the provider” whenever something goes wrong. The player does not deposit with Tequity. The player does not withdraw from Tequity. The player does not speak to Tequity support. The player does not compete in a Tequity leaderboard. The player plays on Housebets, with a Housebets wallet, Housebets UI, Housebets rewards, Housebets leaderboard and Housebets support. 1/2

Dr. W

20,491 views • 2 months ago