Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

45 points, 10 assists, 4 steals - no stretch 4 - the floor spacing shrunk - aching back - media blitz'd by every content creator - who knows what type of knee health - social media left and right wing slander - 25 minute restriction - Steph White ball...

21,094 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

#KarenRead How are content creators other than the blogger charged with 18 + crimes related to witness intimidation contributing to the harassment of the witnesses? Two examples: On the left we have a content creator who tells her audience she presents the case as "fact" based from "court records" and yet we hear as recently as the latest episode an opinion not rooted in fact about Colin Albert. She states he has a temper and tendency to fight and yet nothing was presented at trial to establish this. No police reports of fights, no testimony with first hand experience that Colin was rage filled. Not a thing save two social media posts presented during his cross examination which could be interpreted as nothing more than typical teenage bravado. And yet because she consistently repeats she is objective & fact based, there is a possibility her audience will be misled into thinking her opinion is established fact, not gossip or speculation. On the right we have another content creator who allowed two prominent FKR "movement" Canton residents to present gossip and innuendo about Colin as fact. Neither one of these women had a single bit of evidence to support their libel. No police reports. No specific, verifiable incidents. Nothing. And yet Brian broadcast this gossip with no fact checking or pushback as to its veracity. What has happened to these witnesses is shameful and so many content creators swooped in and sought financial gain by participating in it. Subtle and overt have no difference when it is destroying an innocent person's life. Someday we will collectively look back and realize this.

Julie Carpenter

14,202 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

AT LAST... JOHN ARUM AZI HAS BEEN SET FREE. The entire family of John Arum Azi was enveloped in overwhelming joy and relief as they welcomed him back home after enduring countless days trapped in the harrowing clutches of his kidnappers, a situation that seemed to stretch time itself and cast a shadow of despair over their lives. Anyone who has followed his story will undoubtedly remember the agonizing moment when a chilling video surfaced, showcasing what appeared to be a torture scene that rapidly spread across various social media platforms, capturing the attention and hearts of viewers worldwide. This disturbing footage was not just an abstract horror; it was a visceral reminder of the reality faced by John, and it prompted an outpouring of concern and sympathy from social media users who subsequently rallied for his release by demanding that the kidnappers return him safely to his loved ones. Today marks a significant turning point, as he is finally enjoying the freedom that had been cruelly snatched away. However, amidst the jubilation, the atmosphere on social media remains charged, with many voices urging his family to ensure that he seeks therapy and to arrange for a counseling appointment to help him navigate the psychological scars left by this traumatic ordeal. The potential for lasting effects, such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), looms large as a reality that cannot be overlooked, and it serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring impact such experiences can have on a person’s mental health. As a family, they are relieved and thankful for his safe return, all the while knowing that healing from this trauma is just beginning.

JOStified X

165,377 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Terrible optics for Chris Hipkins. A high-profile staffer in the Labour leader’s office is sharing content on social media that is strongly anti-US law enforcement and smears President Trump and the White House. Last night, Jordan Rivers shared a post featuring the lyrics: "Fuck ICE, we ain't gonna play nice" "Oh, you wanna fight? Keep sucking daddy's dick on the far right." This is widely interpreted as a direct critique and smear of Trump and his administration's immigration enforcement policies. Rivers also shared a cartoon depicting U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi looming menacingly over what appears to be an Epstein victim, bellowing "Look at the stock market!" in her face. This morning, Rivers went further by sharing an altered screenshot of a White House post on X. The original caption—“These are just some of the most dangerous illegal aliens ICE took off our streets this Tuesday”—was removed, leaving only the header: “Pedophiles. Kidnappers. Violent Assailants.” This edit implies that White House staff fit those categories. This content has reached Rivers' more than 70,000 followers on Instagram, while he works in the Labour leader's office. Mainstream media have so far failed to put any questions to Hipkins about Rivers' hiring or the inflammatory material he shares publicly on social media, without disclaimers and despite his role as a paid parliamentary staffer. Hipkins, who aspires to become the next Prime Minister and would therefore communicate directly with President Trump, must be asked whether it remains appropriate for Rivers to continue working with the Labour Party.

Suit and tie

13,127 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Let’s be absolutely clear with the facts from today’s “march against the far right” which I attended from the start. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 1. These were left-wing organisations from all over the UK. Every union under the sun was in attendance. National Education Union are definitely indoctrinating children within the teacher and school environment, just look at their presence today. It is very concerning. Watch what they teach your kids. They, as an education union, along with Unite the union: join a union, were also fighting over who got to be at the front of the march today, thanks to two lesbian powerhouses not having it. Comedy gold 😂 2. The second video shows over 100 coaches being used to bus in all these so-called “concerned citizens” on organised transport. They are all part of a left-wing narrative which just doesn’t work anymore, we see exactly what they are doing. That was the entire left-wing loony left in attendance. That’s it. That’s them. This is a major point! We have millions who know what’s right, and the left wing in this country is about to get the shock of their lives in the next elections, swept off the map. That was a panic march. They know it’s coming! 3. There was no working class at this march! Fact! It was all middle and upper class people who attend the usual Palestine marches and Palestine Action events. They hate the Union Jack flag and they hate the working class. This was a stunt by the well-organised unions to pretend the country is behind them which it is not. And that was clear as day to witness today. Also a clear panic march. 4. We don’t have much to worry about. These people are not in the real world. They are privileged and wealthy. And as I said, that’s the crowd, that’s them. They are in total fantasy land, and it’s now time for the adults to get back in charge. 5. Long live England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿✝️🇬🇧

Danny Tommo

84,224 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BREAKING: Claude + Arcads can now run your entire ecom brand tiktok like a $500/hour social media manager. I reverse-engineered how top social media brands use AI to build million-follower accounts. Here’s the crazy part: This system produces 550+ cinematic, product-ready ads per day from a single prompt. Here’s the full pipeline: → AI generates a realistic UGC persona — face, voice, personality → Arcads clones a natural voiceover in seconds → CapCut auto-edits: captions, pacing, hooks — done → our phone farm method pushes every finished video straight to TikTok Shop → Cruva Social 1 identifies which hooks are already winning in your niche before you film anything The result: 500+ videos a month, per brand, at a fraction of what one UGC creator used to cost. Most brands are still paying $300–500 per video. Testing 10 hooks takes $5,000 and three weeks. With this system, you test 100 hooks in the same timeframe. The ones that win get scaled. Automatically. AI is the new creative director. TikTok doesn’t reward the best video. It rewards the brand that shows up the most — with content that converts. Static agencies are dead. Creator dependency is a liability… and it’s soooo 2025. No more waiting on creators. No more $500 videos that flop after 200 views. The brands that automate content at scale will be the biggest winners of 2026. If you want the full breakdown: Like & comment “SYSTEM” I’ll send you the complete workflow, every prompt, and a step-by-step walkthrough. Free. (Follow first so I can DM.)

Noah Frydberg | Tiktok Shop For Brands

18,089 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Your first Claude MCP Content AI Agent for going VIRAL on Social Media and most creators have no idea this even exists... while I was doom-scrolling Twitter instead of creating content at 2am, this agent in 4 months got me 30,000+ followers, 4M+ views, and 10,000+ leads it doesn't just create content - it cracks the viral code for YOUR specific audience most of you are busy being the "reply guy" sending 200 comments daily hoping someone notices you meanwhile the top 1% aren't guessing - they know exactly what drives engagement, leads, and revenue this agent gives you that unfair advantage instantly here's what it does: – analyzes YOUR top-performing content to find hidden viral patterns – identifies which hooks get 10X more engagement for your audience specifically – reveals why some posts explode while identical ones flop – generates endless viral ideas based on your proven winners – tells you exactly what your audience craves next the content strategy that took me months to crack now happens in minutes it's like cloning Gary Vaynerchuk's content brain - except it actually understands your specific audience and works 24/7 5-minute setup, zero tech skills, no maintenance required the system includes: - complete content history analyzer - viral pattern detection AI - hook performance predictor - engagement optimization engine - personalized content strategist this is the exact system building 6-figure personal brands and you're getting it for free Follow + RT + comment "VIRAL" & I'll send you the FULL setup guide tonight don't sleep on this... every month you wait is thousands of potential followers you'll never get back

Aryan Mahajan

42,899 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Conceptually Thinking Basketball Elite 10 (Iowa 2025) Journey Houston (Journey Houston ) | 5’11” Combo Guard | Davenport North/ All Iowa Attack Girls Quick Stats •National Rank: #85 (ESPN), Potential Top 50 talent •Iowa Rank: #5 •Class: 2025 •Commitment: Iowa (Iowa Women's Basketball) •Team Record (Last 2 Years): 43-5 in 5A basketball •Accolades: One of the most productive careers in Iowa Performance Metrics Houston’s all-around game shines through in her stat line: she averages 19 points, 9 rebounds (4 offensive), 5 assists, and 5 steals per game. This versatile and high-level production highlights her ability to impact every facet of the game, from scoring and rebounding to playmaking and defensive disruption. Skill Breakdown •Scoring: Elite downhill threat with excellent finishing ability. •Rebounding: Outstanding positional rebounder, especially on the offensive glass. •Defense: Versatile defender capable of guarding positions 1-4, with elite defensive instincts. •Playmaking: Exceptional vision and passing ability, elevating team offense. •Athleticism: Physical, athletic player with the size and strength to impose her will on the game. •Competitiveness: High motor and relentless drive to compete at the highest level. Conceptual Analysis Positional Versatility Journey Houston epitomizes the modern combo guard. She blends scoring ability, playmaking, and defensive versatility, allowing her to excel in multiple roles. At 5’11”, her size and athleticism enable her to defend multiple positions while maintaining the skills to lead an offense. This versatility aligns with the trend toward positionless basketball, where players are valued for their ability to contribute in various facets of the game. Offensive Impact 1.Scoring Threat: Houston’s 19 points per game underscore her ability to create offense, particularly through attacking the rim. Her strength and finishing ability make her a constant threat in transition and half-court sets. 2.Playmaking: Averaging 5 assists per game, Houston’s ability to create for her teammates is a testament to her court vision and high basketball IQ. Her ability to score and facilitate makes her a dual offensive threat. Defensive Excellence Houston’s ability to guard positions 1 through 4 makes her a highly valuable defensive asset. Her 5 steals per game highlight her disruptiveness, turning defense into offense and generating transition opportunities. Her physicality and basketball IQ allow her to stifle opposing offenses, making her a game-changer on the defensive end. Physicality and Competitiveness Houston’s physicality and relentless competitiveness set her apart. Her aggressive play style allows her to dominate in rebounding, defend multiple positions, and attack the basket with force. These traits are often what separate good players from great ones, and Houston’s combination of size, skill, and drive gives her a competitive edge in every matchup. Potential and Projection Despite her #85 ranking, Houston is considered a top 50 talent nationally. Her ranking is likely impacted by missing the AAU season due to off-season surgery, suggesting that her true potential is undervalued. As she returns to full health, Houston is expected to rise in national rankings and showcase her top-tier talent. Team Success Houston’s influence on her team is undeniable, with a 43-5 record in 5A basketball over the last two seasons. Her ability to lead and impact games in a variety of ways has directly contributed to her team’s success, reinforcing her status as a winner and a high-level performer. Future Projection •College Impact: Houston projects as an immediate impact player at Iowa, offering versatility that allows her to contribute in numerous ways. Her ability to score, rebound, assist, and defend makes her a perfect fit for the Hawkeyes, and her defensive prowess will be particularly valuable in Big Ten play.

Derrick Beechum

32,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield AI just raised the bar. The quality, motion, and creative control are on another level. Full open-source prompts & assets below. SCENE CONTEXT A young man carries the sleeping woman into her pink bedroom, lays her down on the bed, covers her with the blanket and switches off the lamp, then sits on the floor at the foot of the bed, rests his head on the mattress edge, and falls asleep there, keeping a respectful distance. ACTIVE REFERENCES >>: young man, messy light-brown hair, white t-shirt, carrying then floor-sitting posture, tender careful movement. 100% matches the reference. >>: sleeping young woman, low pigtails, pink hair-roller clip, beige t-shirt with brown long sleeves, pink plaid pajama bottoms, eyes closed, carried then lying tucked in bed. 100% matches the reference. >>: pink bedroom. 100% matches the reference. Every element and corner is preserved and stays consistent across all shots. LOCATION MAP Pink bedroom, remembered corner by corner from >> and held identical in every shot: - Wooden door with brass knob and dark wood trim / wardrobe on one side wall. - A large ornate pink-and-white Victorian dollhouse standing on the floor against the wall. - A wide window with sheer white curtains, cool outside light filtering through. - A vanity desk with an upright mirror and a pink desk chair beside the window, a leafy potted plant next to it. - A tall warm floor lamp — the main practical light — near the bed, wall-mounted shelves with small items above it, wood wainscoting along the lower wall. - An ornate white bed frame with pink ruffled bedding and a soft pink pillow, the central anchor of the room. - A woven area rug on a wooden floor, light soft clutter (tissue boxes, papers) scattered naturally. Open floor between the door and the bed is his carrying path; clear floor space at the foot of the bed is where he sits. FIRST FRAME AND SPATIAL BLOCKING The first visible frame matches the attached carry reference exactly: he stands mid-room holding her in a bridal carry, her head resting against his chest and shoulder, eyes closed, pink plaid fabric bundled across his forearms, the white ornate bed and pink bedding soft behind, sheer-curtained window and dollhouse readable in the background. No empty establishing frame. FORMAT MODE Controlled four-shot sequence with HARD CUTs at 3.5s, 7.5s, and 11.0s. Real-time motion, gentle handheld for the carry only. No subtitles, no music. OPTICS Shot 1 (carry): 50° diagonal field of view, standard normal lens character, camera 1.5 to 2 meters, clean medium two-shot holding both faces. Shot 2 (lay down): 56° diagonal field of view, near-normal lens character, camera low at the head of the bed looking down along her body, 1 to 1.3 meters, shallow depth on her settling face. Shot 3 (blanket + lamp): 63° diagonal field of view, slightly-wide lens character, camera 2 meters back at a bedside three-quarter angle, wide enough to hold him, the tucked bed, and the floor lamp in frame. Shot 4 (floor sleep): 63° diagonal field of view, slightly-wide lens character, camera low at the foot of the bed, then a slow crane-up to a high three-quarter looking down the length of the bed. CAMERA Shot 1: gentle handheld follow, slow dolly-in with him toward the bed, subtle vertical bob and weight-shift pulse matching the carry, human motion not digital jitter. Shot 2: separate angle from the head of the bed; slow push-in as he lowers her, settling as her head meets the pillow. Shot 3: static-leaning three-quarter as he draws the blanket up and tucks it, then reaches and clicks off the floor lamp; frame holds through the drop into moody low light, her tucked body still framed. Shot 4: low static at the foot of the bed as he sinks to the floor and lowers his head to the mattress edge, then a smooth crane-up to a high three-quarter — her tucked on the bed, him asleep on the floor below. ACTION TIMING 0.0s to 3.5s: he carries her in a bridal hold, walking slowly toward the bed, her head lolling gently against his chest, pigtail swaying with each step. 3.5s HARD CUT. 3.5s to 7.5s: from the head-of-bed angle he lowers her onto the mattress, her shoulders and head settling into the pillow, hair fanning out, body coming to rest. 7.5s HARD CUT. 7.5s to 11.0s: he draws the pink blanket up over her and tucks the edge along her shoulder with both hands, then reaches to the floor lamp and switches it off; the warm glow dies and the room falls to cool moody window light — she lies exactly as he left her, tucked and unmoved. 11.0s HARD CUT. 11.0s to 15.0s: in the dim room he lowers himself to sit on the floor at the foot of the bed, rests his head sideways on the mattress edge near her feet, settles, breathing slows, and he closes his eyes and falls asleep there — not on the bed, a clear respectful distance kept. PHYSICS Her body carries real dead-weight during the carry — limbs sag, head lolls, pigtail swings freely. As he lowers her, pillow and mattress compress under her head and shoulders, hair sliding and resettling; the pink blanket drapes and folds naturally as it is pulled up and tucked. His footsteps are grounded heel-to-toe with real weight transfer. As he sinks to the floor his weight settles, one arm resting on the mattress, head lowering onto the edge which dips slightly; his eyelids close with a soft final settle. LIGHTING Cinematic low-key interior, moody and restrained, never bright or flat. Primary motivation: the warm floor lamp and a low bedside practical, casting soft warm pools with gentle falloff into deep but detailed shadow, cool bluish light from the sheer-curtained window balancing the warmth for filmic warm-cool contrast. Naturalistic film texture, soft grain, gentle highlight rolloff, faces modeled and readable within the low light, not lit up. Shots 1–3 carry the warm lamp motivation. At the lamp switch (shot 3) the room drops to cool low-key window moonlight — atmospheric, shadows deep, her tucked form and his movement still clearly readable, never a crushed black frame. Shot 4 stays in this cool moody light, his sitting, head-lowering, and closing eyes visible, the bed and floor softly modeled by the window. AUDIO Shot 1: soft footsteps, faint effort breath under her weight, a quiet sleepy sigh from her. Shot 2: soft mattress and pillow settle as she comes to rest. Shot 3: gentle blanket rustle as he tucks her in, a quiet lamp-switch click, room tone shifting. Shot 4: a soft floor settle and faint cloth rustle as he sits and lowers his head, then quiet steady breathing from both. No dialogue, no music, no subtitles. POSITIVE LOCKS First frame matches the attached carry reference exactly. Man matches >> exactly, woman matches >> exactly. The bedroom matches >> exactly and every listed corner — door and wood trim, ornate dollhouse, sheer-curtained window, vanity with mirror and pink chair, floor lamp, shelves, ornate white bed with pink ruffled bedding, woven rug — stays present and consistent across all four shots, with no new or missing furniture. Carrying and laying her down are two separate shots with different angles. Lighting stays cinematic and dim, motivated by the practical lamps, never bright or flat. When the lamp is switched off she remains tucked in the exact pose he left her, unmoved. He does not lie on the bed: he sleeps sitting on the floor at the foot of the bed with his head on the mattress edge, a clear respectful gap kept.

𝗦𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗮

50,358 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Created with Getvivix , ethereal high-fantasy visuals, volumetric glow, and fluid cinematic motion crafted like a continuous film sequence. Seedance on Getvivix offers one of the lowest costs in the market , around 1000 credits ($1 per video), making high-quality cinematic generation highly scalable and affordabl You can try it here Prompt included below STORYBOARD 2 — "THE ENCHANTRESS PROJECT TYPE: 10-second cinematic fantasy storyboa CHARACTER LOCK Single consistent elf sorceress — original fictional STYLIZED fantasy character (not a real person): pointed ears, long flowing BLONDE hair, an elegant flowing medieval gown, graceful curvy figure (tasteful, elegant), holding a glowing wand. Her FACE IS NEVER CLEARLY SEEN — hood up and/or long blonde hair falling across her face, turned 3/4-away, or haloed/silhouetted by her own magic light in every frame. Identical elf/gown/wand across all frame STYLE Ethereal high-fantasy, cinematic, painterly film stills, dreamli PACING & FLO Slow, graceful, dreamy — no rush. One continuous moment: she walks into a glade and conjures a bloom of magic. Smooth gradual rises and push-ins; the magic light grows continuously across frames so each beat melts into the next — light + motion carry through, no hard cut FRAMES (8 shots, 0–10s) — angle | lens | motion | lighting | environment | → into nex 1 (0–1.5s Wide | 35mm | stands 3/4-back in a sunlit enchanted glade, hair drifting, slow push-in | dappled god-rays, mist | mossy ruins, floating motes → she steps forwa 2 (1.5–3s Tracking from behind | 50mm | walks gracefully deeper, gown + hair trailing | soft backlight | glowing flora → she raises the wa 3 (3–4.5s 3/4-back, slow rise | 50mm | lifts the wand, tip kindling to light, hair veiling her face | warm wand-glow | ferns, fireflies → light begins to blo 4 (4.5–6s Low rising | 35mm | magic blooms upward — motes + spiraling vines of light | radiant magic key | glade lighting up → she sweeps the wa 5 (6–7.5s Orbiting 3/4 | 50mm | sweeps the wand, conjuring a swirl of glowing petals, turning so hair hides her face | bloom of color | swirling light → camera keeps orbiti 6 (7.5–8.5s): Silhouette wide | 35mm | the glade ignites with fireflies, she's haloed by her own magic (face in silhouette) | rim halo | full glow → she tilts her head 7 (8.5–9.5s): Low 3/4-back | 50mm | gazes up at her creation, face turned up and away | soft uplight, sparkles | canopy of light → camera settl 8 (9.5–10s Hero hold | 35mm | stands amid the slow-swirling magic, 3/4-back silhouette, ethereal | dreamy backlight haze | glowing glade → free LAYOUT: film sheet — left: 3 dynamic poses (walking, casting upward, mid-sweep — in-scene, face hair-veiled/turned); center: 8-frame grid; right: director notes; bottom: 0–10 VISUAL STYLE: ethereal high-fantasy, painterly, volumetric god-rays, magical bloom light, floating particles, shallow DOF, soft slow camera; stylized — NOT photorealistic, not real human skin; FACE NEVER CLEARLY SEEN (hood / blonde hair / turned / haloed).

Ai Girllie

14,141 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield AI Full open-sourced prompts & assets below: SCENE CONTEXT A young woman sleeps on her side in her pink bedroom at night; in a single locked frame the room snaps instantly from night to morning like a finger-snap time jump. She sleepily half-wakes, turns over to find a white cat curled against her back, then pushes up to half-sitting and sees her room quietly tidied — her school uniform hung on the chair and her backpack packed on the vanity. ACTIVE REFERENCES >>: young woman, low pigtails, pink hair-roller clip, beige t-shirt with brown long sleeves, sleeping then waking. 100% matches the reference. >>: fluffy white long-haired cat, adult, curled and pressed against her back. 100% matches the reference. >>: pink bedroom. 100% matches the reference. Every element and corner is preserved and stays consistent across all shots. >>: school uniform — navy cardigan, white shirt, green-striped tie, plaid skirt, knee socks — draped and hung on the pink chair. 100% matches the reference. >>: solid pink backpack with front zip pocket and pink pompom keychain, packed and zipped, standing on the vanity table. 100% matches the reference. LOCATION MAP Pink bedroom, remembered corner by corner and held identical in every shot: - Screen-left: a wooden door with a brass knob, dark wood trim and wood wainscoting along the lower wall, blush-pink upper walls. - Beside the door: a large ornate pink-and-white Victorian dollhouse with a small pink chair at its base. - A white vanity desk with a trifold arched mirror, cluttered with cosmetics, brushes and small bottles, a pink desk chair tucked at it. - A wide window with sheer white curtains behind the vanity; a leafy potted plant beside it. - A tall brass floor lamp standing near the bed. - A wooden nightstand at the head of the bed with a small lamp, a framed photo, a tissue box and a cup. - The bed against the wall: carved wooden headboard, pink ruffled bedding, pink pillows, a soft pink blanket — the central anchor of the room. - A woven area rug over dark hardwood floor, a small wall shelf with items above the bed side. FIRST FRAME AND SPATIAL BLOCKING The first visible frame is a close-up of her sleeping face. She lies on her left side facing the bedside lamp / nightstand side, cheek on the pink pillow, hair loose, pink hair-roller clip visible, breathing slow. The bed's pink blanket is clean and clear. No empty establishing frame. FORMAT MODE Controlled four-shot sequence with HARD CUTs at 4.0s, 8.0s and 11.5s. The night-to-morning transition inside shot 1 is an instantaneous in-frame light change, not a cut. Real-time motion. No subtitles, no music. OPTICS Shot 1: 50° diagonal field of view, standard normal lens character, camera 0.6 to 0.8 meters from her face, shallow depth of field — closed eyelids, lashes, loose strands and the hair-roller clip razor-sharp, the room soft behind. Shot 2: 56° diagonal field of view, near-normal lens character, camera 1 meter, holding her face and the white cat against her back, rack focus available between them. Shot 3: 63° diagonal field of view, slightly-wide lens character, camera 1.5 to 2 meters, rising with her as she sits up, more of the room entering frame. Shot 4: 84° diagonal field of view, classic wide lens character, camera 2 meters, wide enough to reveal the tidied room — vanity, chair and bed together — then easing toward her. CAMERA Shot 1: locked close-up with a very slow creeping push-in; the framing does not change through the night-to-morning snap. Shot 2: small reframe and rack focus as she turns, pulling focus onto the cat curled at her back, then back to her reacting face. Shot 3: a smooth crane-up rising with her from lying to half-sitting, revealing the room behind the bed. Shot 4: a slow pan across the tidied room — uniform on the chair, packed backpack on the vanity — settling with a gentle push-in on her half-sitting figure and dawning expression. ACTION TIMING 0.0s to 2.0s: close on her sleeping face at night, perfectly still, breathing slow, cool dim room around her. 2.0s: an instantaneous in-frame light snap — the room flips from night to morning in a single frame, no cut, no dissolve; she does not move at all, only the light changes, like a finger-snap time jump. 2.0s to 4.0s: hold on her face now in soft warm morning light, still asleep for a beat. 4.0s HARD CUT. 4.0s to 8.0s: she sleepily half-opens her eyes, stirs, and turns over toward screen-right, discovering a fluffy white cat curled warmly against her back; her half-lidded eyes drift to it. 8.0s HARD CUT. 8.0s to 11.5s: she pushes herself up on one arm to half-sitting, hair mussed from sleep, blinking and groggy, beginning to glance around the room. 11.5s HARD CUT. 11.5s to 15.0s: reveal of the quietly tidied room — her navy cardigan and plaid skirt uniform hung neatly on the pink chair at the vanity, the packed pink backpack standing zipped on the vanity table, its pompom keychain still — her expression softening into slow, disbelieving realization as she takes it in. PHYSICS During the night-to-morning snap her body is absolutely motionless — only light changes, no drift, no shift. As she wakes, eyelids lift heavily, she rolls with natural weight and the mattress and blanket shift under her; the cat's long fur rises and falls with slow breathing and compresses softly where it presses to her back. Sitting up, her hair falls loose in individual strands, the blanket sliding down naturally, her supporting arm taking real weight. LIGHTING Cinematic and restrained throughout, never bright or flat. Night (pre-snap): low-key cool moonlight through the sheer curtains with a faint warm practical accent, deep but detailed shadow, moody film texture and soft grain. At the snap, the light flips instantly to soft warm directional morning sun through the sheer curtains — golden but controlled and filmic, gentle rolloff, faces readable, shadows soft, not overexposed or blown out. The warm-cool contrast and naturalistic grain carry the cinematic feel into every shot. AUDIO Shot 1: quiet steady sleeping breath, faint cool room tone; at the snap a soft airy shimmer-whoosh transient marks the time jump, then gentle morning birdsong and warm ambience fade in. Shot 2: a soft sleepy inhale, faint fur rustle as she finds the cat, a quiet purr. Shot 3: soft blanket rustle as she sits up. Shot 4: quiet held breath, faint ambient morning tone under her realization. No dialogue, no music, no subtitles. POSITIVE LOCKS Woman matches >> exactly, cat matches >> exactly, bedroom matches >> exactly and every listed corner — wooden door, dollhouse, vanity with trifold mirror, pink chair, brass floor lamp, wooden nightstand, carved bed with pink ruffled bedding, woven rug — stays present and consistent across all four shots, with no new or missing furniture. The bed's pink blanket is clean and clear — no laptop, bag, papers or objects resting on top of it. The night-to-morning transition is one instantaneous in-frame light change on a single locked framing; she does not move during it — no dissolve, no fade, no camera cut. The white cat lies pressed against her back. In the final shot the uniform hangs on the pink chair matching >> and the packed backpack sits on the vanity matching >>. Lighting stays cinematic and controlled, never bright or washed out.

Noor

13,772 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Part 1: There's many people, particularly Testosteronies and Meat Heads, trying to do their "analysis" on the "gunshot" and all they do is prove they're just as captured and controlled as they like 99.9% of moving mouths on Social Media, do not know a single word from a single line from a single paragraph from a single Law or Order currently invoked. There's all kinds of "scenarios"... You'll hear: Guy with gun under arm. Guy in the corner, elevated, to his right. Guy on the front with hand on metal security fencing. And now a Crayon eating Marine Corps Veteran, claiming to be a Sniper, saying that was an Exit Wound seen on camera, which meant the shot came from behind. Not only do the nimrods spewing all that nonsense not breakdown the intricacies of the videos displayed to the public... but they also do not breakdown the Laws and Orders surrounding everything taking place because they do NOT know ANY of those. God forbid there's a Blueprint of unique Laws and Orders that more than clearly outline 45———47 as a Strategic and Special Operation with Unconventional and Irregular Warfare with unique Strategies and Tactics to liberate the United States of America aka Drain the Swamp as prescribed in our Rights and Duties in the Declaration of Independence. CK started using Tents with Backdrops and Platforms under tent from earliest accounts in 2024, as seen on TPUSA Instagram posts. The under arm gun, immediately in front, and elevated to top right, are automatically ruled out due to what was shown on TV and Social Media as the "wound" was to the front left neck. The Marine Corps Sniper claiming the "shot" was an "exit wound," meaning the shot would come from behind... clearly didn't study much of anything... didn’t eat his Fuchsia crayon. The video showing the "evacuation"... One, showed the alleyway full of vehicles. Two, a "shooter" from the back, would have to know where CK was sitting, and shot through the backdrop. Three, when you study the photo given by ALL Media, CK was sitting where his chair was immediately to the left of cement pillars of the building behind the backdrop tent and shadows show vehicles to the left of the pillar. Which means a "shooter" from the back would have had to shoot from ground level under the building through vehicles and a pillar through a backdrop and know that CK was elevated on a platform under the tent. This is why details matter. Now, let's review the visuals on Sept. 10, again: Mainstream Media reporting 200 yard shot before a shooter or location identified. Tent placed in the middle of buildings. Tent placed right beside a 'Hatch Door' to underground escape. Man looking like 3rd Base Coach using hand gestures from nose to ears simultaneous CK doing the same gestures. Central Casting audience as they crouched down until told to run. Zero Graphic Content Censorship of Actual Footage Video circulating on Social Media. To date, that footage is still not censored as Graphic Content. Mark from shirt that moved from shirt to collar to neck as the "bullet hole." Still holding microphone upright in a chair with zero arms after a jugular “shot.” The MSM Expert Doctor says "immediate death"... which would mean automatic dead weight... NOT nerves telling hand to keep holding a microphone up near head sitting upright in a chair with no arms. Zero blood stains on shirt from every single angle taken via MSM. Zero blood flowed anywhere beyond chest via “blood gushing out.” Slow the video down and you'll see "blood" splattering HORIZONTALLY with the footage showing the blood did not land on any surface to create a new direction. Wedding Ring clearly moves from ring finger to pinky finger. Chair goes through the table... Guy's head goes through the camera (after "shot")... The Live Video side angle as posted by pundit David Harris Jr. shows ZERO blood as the front angle shows "bursting" forward as an old school water pipe in the yard.

Derek Johnson

12,008 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Seedance 2.0 on Sjolt =================== Prompt: Style: 8K. Photorealistic — no 3D render, no game engine. Korean idol variety self-content aesthetic with a glam music-video mood — playful romantic tension, kiss-that-never-happens energy, always tasteful. Lighting: Warm and moody, dimmer than standard broadcast — soft warm key from frame-left, glowing string-light bokeh and a soft neon wash in the background, gentle amber rim light tracing hair and cheekbones, faces always cleanly lit. Color: 60:30:10 — dusty rose and mauve dominant / deep plum shadow secondary / red Pepero box and warm neon accent. Broadcast graphics: Persistent variety-show overlay locked to screen corners across every cut — a round pastel-pink "MELLOW GIRLS" show logo badge pinned top-left, and a title graphic pinned top-right reading exactly "PEPERO GAME", spelled P-E-P-E-R-O with one single P in the middle of the word — NOT "PEPPERO", NOT double P. Overlays never drift, never distort, letters never change between cuts. No subtitles, no lower-thirds. Props: The Pepero stick is MATCHSTICK-THIN — a delicate biscuit stick as thin as a wooden matchstick or a cotton-swab stem, about 2-3mm in diameter and 14cm long, with a whisper-thin chocolate coating, exactly matching the attached real Pepero product reference photo. Scale rule: the stick is always dramatically thinner than a person's lips are tall — a hair-thin line compared to the faces around it. It is NEVER a thick bar, never cigar-thick, never pencil-thick — if in doubt, make it thinner. The red Pepero box is a small light carton the size of a smartphone, held in one hand — it always looks small in a hand. Dialogue: Any spoken words are KOREAN ONLY — short natural Korean exclamations like "대박!", "어떡해!", "미쳤어!". Never any English words spoken. Camera: Physical broadcast cine lens. 180° shutter motion blur. Skin: Pore-level realism — vellus hair, glossy idol makeup, pore-shadow matching set light. Skin tone stays CONSTANT from first frame to last — no blushing, no reddening of cheeks or ears, no color change on any face at any point. Acting: Charged restraint — slow blinks, lidded eyes, gazes that drop from eyes to lips and back, breath held then released, a swallow before a move, suppressed smiles. The tension of almost — never a kiss, never contact between lips. Characters never frozen, always breathing and reacting. Physics: Gravity and inertia respected — the thin stick flexes slightly and snaps cleanly like a real biscuit, correct bite marks, tiny crumbs fall naturally. No floating props. Composition: Rule of thirds + golden ratio. Every person moving from frame one. Continuity: Characters, wardrobe, props, environment identical across every cut. No identity drift. Technical: 24fps smooth motion. 8K detail. No jitter. Audio: Room tone and close breathy foreground in the tense cuts — but from the moment the game starts, the two spectators keep up a constant excited high-pitched squealing off-screen ("꺄아—!", "꺄악!"), bubbling under every cut, rising with every bite, choking into whispers at the climax. Korean chatter, the crisp dry snap of the biscuit stick. No music. No subtitles. Characters: YURI — the group's eldest (unnie). Long platinum-blonde hair with wispy see-through bangs, pale porcelain skin, cool deadpan resting face. Cream cable-knit sweater vest over a white long-sleeve shirt, navy sailor collar with double white stripes, navy tie, pleated denim mini skirt, slouchy white loose socks, black loafers. RENA — younger than YURI. Long jet-black straight hair, sharp elegant features, pearl drop earrings. Black ribbed knit top with a wide pointed knit collar and thin black ribbon tie over a peeking white shirt collar, black pleated micro skirt with a small side buckle, black crew socks, chunky black loafers. HAEIN — long pastel ice-blue hair with a faint lavender sheen, glossy coral lips. Mustard-yellow double-breasted cropped blazer with navy trim, big navy bow ribbon at the collar, mustard sweater underneath, navy pleated skirt, white socks, white sneakers. MEMBER 4 — long black hair with soft face-framing layers, warm bright smile. Sleeveless green-and-white striped ribbed knit top with an orange-striped high neck and a small white triangle badge, light-blue wide-leg jeans, white sneakers. Scene: A moody glam lounge set — a dusty-rose velvet drape backdrop with a soft glowing neon squiggle sign, strings of warm fairy lights hanging out of focus, a tall arrangement of pale roses and pampas grass at frame-left, warm haze in the air. No table — everyone is STANDING. YURI and RENA stand face to face at center frame in profile to camera, barely a forearm's length apart, one matchstick-thin chocolate-dipped Pepero stick bridging their mouths, each end barely gripped between front teeth. HAEIN and MEMBER 4 stand a step behind at frame-right, shoulder to shoulder; HAEIN holds the small red Pepero box in one hand, forgotten. The broadcast overlays sit locked in the top-left and top-right corners throughout. CUT 1 — Wide static, 35mm, eye-level, locked off: The face-off. YURI and RENA stand toe to toe in the warm neon glow, the matchstick-thin stick a delicate line between their profiles. RENA tucks a strand of black hair behind her ear without breaking eye contact. YURI's chin lifts a degree — silent challenge. Behind them HAEIN grips MEMBER 4's arm with her free hand, both leaning in; MEMBER 4 whispers "어떡해…". Off-screen someone breathes "시작…" — the first slow bites begin. CUT 2 — Over-the-shoulder, 50mm, slow push-in over RENA's shoulder onto YURI: Framed past RENA's black hair, YURI takes one slow bite, then another — unhurried, deliberate. Her lidded eyes hold RENA's, then drop for half a second to RENA's lips, then come back up. The stick shortens. Her cool deadpan stays intact but her fingers slowly curl into the hem of her knit vest, betraying her. Shallow focus, warm bokeh blooming behind her. Her breathing is close-mic in the foreground while the spectators' high-pitched squeals bubble continuously off-screen — "꺄아—!" — climbing a note with every bite. CUT 3 — Reverse over-the-shoulder, 50mm, slow push-in over YURI's shoulder onto RENA: Mirror framing past YURI's platinum hair. RENA's answer: she bites in slowly, closing the distance, head tilting to the angle of a kiss. More than half the stick is gone. Her hands stay clasped neatly behind her back — the well-mannered posture of the younger member toward her unnie — which makes the boldness of her bite land twice as hard. One eyebrow lifts a millimeter. Off-screen HAEIN's high strangled "꺄악—!", hands presumably over her mouth, MEMBER 4's giddy stomping heard under it. CUT 4 — Tight profile close-up, 85mm, static, shallow depth of field — the almost-kiss: Both faces in full profile fill the frame — noses, lips, chins all visible for scale. Only TWO OR THREE CENTIMETERS of the matchstick-thin stick remain, and their noses are about to collide — the stick can't get any shorter head-on. Then the move the fans are waiting for: RENA slowly TILTS her head to one side, her nose sliding past YURI's nose instead of bumping it, faces now interlocking at the kiss angle — and the blocked final centimeter opens up. She nibbles in again, millimeter by millimeter, the stub shrinking shorter than seemed possible, until their lips are a single warm breath apart, offset and almost overlapping. Lidded eyes gone slightly cross-eyed at this distance. YURI's answer: her hands rise and take a firm, gentle hold of BOTH of RENA's shoulders — the unnie steadying her challenger, half embrace, half "I'm not losing." She swallows but holds her ground. RENA's breath audibly trembles on the exhale — the composed one cracking first. A long held beat, the tiny stub trembling between two suppressed smiles. Off-screen a whispered "미쳤어…". CUT 5 — Handheld wide, 24mm, whip in from the spectators: At the closest possible moment the tiny stub SNAPS with a crisp dry crack. The spell breaks — YURI lets go of RENA's shoulders and spins away covering her mouth with both hands, shoulders shaking with laughter; RENA turns the other way, presses the back of her hand to her lips, then bursts out laughing — dipping into a small apologetic half-bow toward her unnie between laughs. HAEIN and MEMBER 4 collapse into each other screaming "대박!! 미쳤어!!", the small red box tumbling from HAEIN's hand. Camera shakes with the chaos. Corner overlays stay locked as the room erupts.

TSUBAKI

24,100 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

🧐 At this point, Billboard's latest "Top 50 Songs of 2026 So Far" list feels less like an objective ranking and more like another example of the music industry and media attempting to minimize Drake's success. Let's be serious for a second. Drake released a No. 1 album in 2026, generated some of the biggest streaming numbers of the year, dominated online conversations, and continued to be one of the most commercially successful artists in music. Yet somehow Billboard couldn't find room for any of the biggest records from that project inside the Top 10. But an unreleased Jay-Z freestyle from the Roots Picnic landed at No. 7. Make it make sense. This wasn't even an official single. It wasn't commercially released. It wasn't a chart-dominating record. It wasn't a song fans were streaming for months. It was a basic freestyle performance that generated a few headlines because people were debating who Jay-Z was taking shots at. Meanwhile, Drake's first appearance on the list doesn't arrive until No. 18 with "Shabang." And what makes it even more interesting is Billboard's write up itself. Instead of simply explaining why the freestyle ranked so highly, the article almost reads like it was written specifically to elevate Jay-Z while taking subtle shots at Drake. 💬 “Jigga had everyone talking about who he dissed and why for like two weeks straight.” 💬 “Now we wait and see what Drake has to say about some of the jabs sent his way.” The obvious question is: 🤔 Since when did two weeks of social media discussion become more important than actual chart performance, streaming numbers, sales, and commercial impact? Because if cultural conversation is now the standard, Drake has been one of the most discussed artists in music all year. If commercial success is the standard, Drake should be much higher. If streaming numbers are the standard, Drake should be much higher. If chart performance is the standard, Drake should be much higher. So what exactly is the standard? That's why many fans continue to believe there is an effort within parts of the industry and media to downplay Drake's accomplishments. Every time Drake breaks records, the conversation becomes about somebody else. Every time Drake has a successful release, the focus shifts to a narrative. Every time Drake reaches another milestone, there seems to be an attempt to explain away the achievement instead of simply acknowledging it. And this ranking feels like another example. An unreleased freestyle being placed ahead of records from one of the biggest artists of the year isn't just questionable it raises legitimate questions about whether these lists are actually based on music or whether they're being influenced by industry relationships, personal preferences, and predetermined narratives. Of course, Billboard is entitled to its opinion. But when a No. 1 Drake album struggles to place songs in the Top 10 while a freestyle performance is treated like one of the defining records of the year, fans are naturally going to question the credibility of the ranking. 💭 “To some Drake fans, moments like this fuel the belief that there’s an industry network of gatekeepers whether it’s powerful media figures, executives, or influential artists who consistently seem to move in lockstep whenever Drake is the target. Seeing an unreleased Jay-Z freestyle ranked above songs from a No. 1 Drake album only adds to that perception. Some supporters even describe it as a ‘secret society’ mentality, where certain media outlets and industry power players appear quick to elevate narratives that benefit Jay-Z and others while simultaneously downplaying Drake’s accomplishments. Whether that’s actually happening or not is up for debate, but rankings like this are exactly why those conversations continue.

Cousin Tino ™️

78,088 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

SCOOP: Sources tell me GOP Conference Chair Chairwoman Lisa McClain Lisa McClain leaked the agenda of tomorrow’s scheduled hearing in the Congressional Committee on Education and Workforce titled “College Presidents to Answer for Sources Inciting Antisemitism” to the Embassy of Qatar when she found out members would be discussing Qatar’s funding of US colleges and universities and pro-Palestinian activities on campus. I have obtained exclusive video footage of Lisa McClain dancing with Qataris at a rooftop party on July 4, 2025 where she hosted the Qataris ON INDEPENDENCE DAY Why did Congresswoman Lisa McClain, who serves in House GOP leadership as Conference Chair, host a party for Qatar on July 4th at the Spy Museum (you can’t make this up!) where she was publicly caught dancing and toasting to the pro-HAMAS, anti-American Qataris on Independence Day? Upon investigating, I discovered that her Chief of Staff Nick Hawatadeh Nick Hawatmeh (who is Jordanian) and Erik Kinney, her Policy Director, have taken numerous trips to Qatar that are publicly disclosed on her staff’s travel documents, FARA records, as well as documented on her own social media. I have also obtained the memo that the Embassy of Qatar Embassy of Qatar in USA prepared and sent out to members of Congress after they were tipped off by Lisa McClain and her staff. Sources on the Hill say that her pro-Qatar office leaked the Education and Workforce Committee memo on antisemitism on college campuses to Qatar before the hearing tomorrow so that the Qataris would have the questions ahead of time, so they could push back on the committee with Qatari talking points. This is illegal, and will likely trigger a major ethics violation. Additionally, why are the staff of top GOP leadership going to Qatar? 🤔 Why is the House GOP Conference Chair hosting a party for Qatar on America’s Independence Day? Why is she dancing with Qatari agents on 4th of July when Qatar supports HAMAS and Hezbollah? Congress is no longer a serious place. Lisa McClain should resign over her betrayal of her fellow Committee Members and the United States in favor of Qatar and the Dancing Qataris. Does Speaker Johnson Speaker Mike Johnson condone this pro-jihadi behavior by Chairwoman Lisa McClain? Here’s the video! 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

4,559,990 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Judges and Jurors should be sacrosanct to the judicial process. It is hard to put in words my reverance for the judges and juries I stood before. The judges who presided over the many trials I have been a part of over the last 33 years have been amazing. The juries have always been what they shoud be- Untainted truth seekers. Many times, the jury members wrote me notes. I cherish each one. Many times, the judge allowed the jurors to meet us. I also cherish those interactions. I have spoken out regarding the jury process related to the murder trial of Karen Read. Why? Because I believe it to be a disgrace to all I have held to the highest esteem throughout my career. Was this a grand conspiracy? No. Just like the case, it was simple. Read and her propaganda team set out to taint the jury pool. It was not complicated and not disguised. They flaunted their goal. I believe they achieved their goal. Why? Look no further than juror 11. Watch what she has all too joyfully blasted all over SM and MM. Look at her follow list on X. Listen to her. Was she honest on her juror worksheet? I have also said I believe this case, like OJ, is a case of jury nullification. I stand by that likelihood. Let me further explain. In a nutshell, nullification occurs if jurors choose to ignore evidence and find someone either guilty or innocent based on other factors. Let's take the foreman who said if a dead man was on his front porch, police would have stormed his house. The facts show John O'Keefe was not on anyone's front porch. In fact, John was on the curtilage of 34 Fairview nearly as close to the neighbor's front door as the front door of 34 Fairview. The foreman seemingly disregarded this fact in evidence. Look at Juror 11. She talked about the jury's commitment to not hang influenced by their anger over the money spent. Take a look at her further statements. She said Read merely dropped John off. Read reversed 24 MPH according to the evidence. Her tail light was embedded in John's shirt. Juror 11 ignored this evidence. I could go on and on with this juror, but suffice to say, I believe she would have aquitted no matter what the evidence was based on her own admissions and her social media. That's nullification and has nothing to do with reasonable doubt. I have listened to every minute of both trials. I have read the court documents. I have talked with the victims - family and friends. I have felt their pain. Before anyone takes out of context my concern for what this case has done to our judicial process understand All the facts. I have the same sadness for our system that I had after the OJ verdict. I respect the views of those who don't share my concern. Freedom of speech is imperative. But it would be remiss and wrong of me not to share the truth as I know it and call attention to what I see as a failed process soiled by social media for unethical reasons. #KarenRead #KarenReadRetrial

Jennifer Coffindaffer

64,214 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr