正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

4Chan Hack Reveals University Professor Moderators, 10 Million Bans, 10 Year Old Software Hack of 4Chan was carried out by users of a competing image message board which published 4Chan source code, staff emails, & more.

60,757 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple 的头像
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 年前

Quantum computers can break today’s encryption in seconds.🔑 Quantum tech will reshape our digital lives. Governments & hackers are preparing for the quantum era. How about you?🛡️ Don’t get left behind!🧠 Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone can help:

DeusIX 的头像
DeusIX1 年前

what ? the infamous hacker known as Four Chan(!) has been caught!

Ben Ritter - #gamedev 的头像
Ben Ritter - #gamedev1 年前

wow, what?

Beoran Aegul 的头像
Beoran Aegul1 年前

So it may have been a honeypot to keep the users busy?

λ_⛤ 🎣 | 🇦🇴💗🇨🇺💗🇮🇪 的头像
λ_⛤ 🎣 | 🇦🇴💗🇨🇺💗🇮🇪1 年前

'blacklisting IPs' is more accurate than 'banning' for those confused

Curiosum_Podex 的头像
Curiosum_Podex1 年前

I kind of thought this was already known….

Curiosum_Podex 的头像
Curiosum_Podex1 年前

Mod states - “not for newbies!” Also Mod (uses .edu domain addy). 😂😂😂😘

John H 的头像
John H1 年前

You love to see it.

相关视频

When President Donald Trump met with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in July, he demanded that it not censor Americans. “I cannot imagine him [Starmer] censoring Truth Social,” said Trump about his social media platform. “I only say good things about him and his country.” In response, Starmer defended the 2023 Online Safety Act, saying “we’re not censoring anyone” and that the law is geared toward protecting children. But now Starmer’s government is, in fact, demanding censorship of Americans — and under the guise of protecting children. The UK’s media regulator, Ofcom, recently sent a series of letters to the US message board website 4chan, demanding internal records and threatening enormous penalties. Ofcom did not respond to Public's requests for comment. The action would be a violation of the First Amendment if the US government were doing it. And “UK laws don’t apply to my clients because they’re American companies,” notes 4Chan's' pro bono attorney Preston Byrne “This is a very well-established, settled legal principle here in the United States.” As such, Ofcom’s action is unprecedented and highly symbolic, since 4Chan played a foundational role in the MAGA movement and Trump’s 2016 victory. 4chan is considered an “image board,” Byrne explained, “where people post images and discuss those images. It’s been a key cornerstone of internet culture for the last fifteen years. The Anonymous movement came out of it. The Donald Trump campaign, to a large extent, started as a meme on 4chan.” This is not a story about foreign governments censoring foreigners in a far-off land. It’s about the UK government under Starmer trying to censor US citizens and a US company. “They threatened 4Chan with fines of up to eighteen million pounds or ten percent of global revenue,” said Byrne, “and up to six months’ imprisonment.” In the 2016 election, 4chan’s /pol/ board served as a launching pad for memes in support of Trump’s campaign. Its users popularized memes like “You can’t stump the Trump” and co-opted symbols such as Pepe the Frog, which were sometimes shared by Trump’s campaign. In response, Byrne has sued the British government in federal courts and provided American lawmakers with draft legislation to protect US companies from foreign governments. “They don’t accept that the US has any sovereignty of its own,” he said. “They’re telling us, ‘Listen, we think that we have the power to dictate American conduct on an American service on American soil.” Unlike Facebook, 4chan allows anonymous posting, which the First Amendment protects. “It doesn’t require users to register an account,” Byrne said. “You’re allowed to post anonymously.” That anonymity, he argues, is precisely what the UK’s new law seeks to destroy. “The Online Safety Act has age-verification requirements and content-moderation requirements,” Byrne explained in a podcast with Public, “which essentially requires every website that has a user in the United Kingdom to implement age verification, which basically means they have to ID their users. If we implement this, it destroys what 4chan is.” Britain’s Online Safety Act, passed in 2023, is the world’s most aggressive internet-speech regime. It forces every website reachable from the UK to prove it has conducted “risk assessments” on possible harms to users, to record those assessments, and to remove or restrict “harmful” content—even if that content is legal elsewhere. “The UK stood up a regime which obligates providers of online services to do things which violate the First Amendment rights of the platform and its users,” said Byrne. “People have the right to talk and speak, and communicate anonymously. It’s a core part of the First Amendment. The age-verification features are something that takes that away.” The principle, he insists, is simple: “The law of the web server is the law of the website. If a server sits in New Jersey, it’s subject to New Jersey and U.S. law—not British law. If the UK wants to block 4chan domestically, that’s their right. But you don’t get to come over to America and tell an American what he can and can’t do.” So Byrne and his co-counsel, Ron Coleman, sued Ofcom in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. The result could become a strain on US-UK relations, particularly since Ofcom’s actions break the promise Starmer made to Trump in July. Why is the Starmer government doing this?

Michael Shellenberger

37,415 次观看 • 10 个月前

Someone leaked a wallet on 4chan three days ago. If you don't know what 4chan is it's an anonymous forum where people post without names. No registration. No profiles. Just anonymous posts that get deleted after a few hours. The thread stayed up for 19 minutes. Then moderators deleted it. I took a screenshot before it disappeared. anoin123. $1.5M profit in 60 days. 207 bets on Polymarket. → Wallet: The post had three sentences: Stop following Twitter. Start doing the opposite. This is my wallet. That was it. Thread got nuked. Gone forever. I spent two days analyzing every position. Now I understand why moderators deleted it so fast. The Pattern: When CNN and every major news outlet screamed US WILL strike Iran by January 31 everyone bought YES at 83 cents. This wallet bought NO at 17 cents. $861,000 bet. Profit: $173,000. CNN was wrong. Anonymous person was right. When Reddit was 100% certain government shutdown would NOT happen on Saturday this wallet bet $869,000 that it WOULD. Profit: $88,412. Reddit was wrong. Anonymous person was right. When Twitter blue checkmarks guaranteed Israel WOULD strike Iran this wallet bet $371,000 on NO. Profit: $73,076. Twitter was wrong. Anonymous person was right. 207 bets. 182 wins. 87.9% accuracy. Not by knowing the future. By betting against what everyone knows for sure. Currently holding $4.1 million in open positions. Every single one against mainstream opinion. Biggest single win: $173,000 betting NO while thousands bought YES. Average bet size: $200,000+. That's not gambling. That's conviction. Why the thread got deleted: 4chan moderators remove posts when they think information is too good. When real money making strategies leak, they kill the thread fast. Keep the alpha for themselves. This person posted their entire wallet publicly. Showed exactly what they were betting. Showed the results. 19 minutes later: deleted. But the wallet is still there. Still trading. Still winning. The profit curve doesn't jump around like a gambler. It climbs steady like someone who reads government documents while everyone else reads tweets ABOUT government documents. The strategy is stupidly simple: Wait for everyone to agree on something. Wait for confidence to hit 80-90%. Bet the opposite side. Heavy. Most people lose because following the crowd feels safe. Everyone agrees. Must be right. This wallet makes money BECAUSE everyone agrees. Crowd consensus = wrong pricing. Someone on 4chan figured out that when 10,000 people are certain about something, they're probably looking at the same headlines and making the same mistake. Thread deleted. Information gone. But I saved the wallet address. $1.5 million in 60 days is $25,000 per day. That's more than most people's yearly salary. The person who posted this on 4chan? Still anonymous. No name. No face. No social media. Just a wallet that bets against everything you read on Twitter and wins 87.9% of the time. Maybe the real information isn't on Twitter with 100,000 likes. Maybe it's in anonymous forums that get deleted in 19 minutes.

Marlow

362,343 次观看 • 6 个月前