Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

5 years ago this month… August 4, 2020… A Massive Explosion Occurred in Beirut, Lebanon Donald Trump was the only world leader who said it looked like an attack “a bomb of some kind”… while the rest of the world said it was from a fire that exploded explosive...

MJTruthUltra's profile picture

MJTruthUltra

648,013 subscribers

19,032 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

On August 4, 2020, massive explosions at the Port of Beirut killed over 200 people and injured more than 6,500. No one has been truly held accountable The blasts were caused by the detonation of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate that had been improperly stored in a warehouse for over six years. The sound of the explosion was heard hundreds of kilometers away — even in neighboring countries. Its force was comparable to a 3.3 magnitude earthquake. In the days that followed, mass protests erupted across Beirut in outrage against the Lebanese government. But now, five years later, the perpetrators remain unidentified, and many buildings and neighborhoods still lie in ruins.
1:52

On August 4, 2020, massive explosions at the Port of Beirut killed over 200 people and injured more than 6,500. No one has been truly held accountable The blasts were caused by the detonation of 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate that had been improperly stored in a warehouse for over six years. The sound of the explosion was heard hundreds of kilometers away — even in neighboring countries. Its force was comparable to a 3.3 magnitude earthquake. In the days that followed, mass protests erupted across Beirut in outrage against the Lebanese government. But now, five years later, the perpetrators remain unidentified, and many buildings and neighborhoods still lie in ruins.

Visegrád 24

52,484 просмотров • 1 год назад

The 'Beirut Explosion' of August 4, 2020 is considered one of the most powerful artificial non-nuclear explosions in history. It was equivalent to around 1.1 kilotons of TNT and generated an M3.3 earthquake. [🎞️davitoqro]
1:52

The 'Beirut Explosion' of August 4, 2020 is considered one of the most powerful artificial non-nuclear explosions in history. It was equivalent to around 1.1 kilotons of TNT and generated an M3.3 earthquake. [🎞️davitoqro]

Massimo

294,024 просмотров • 1 год назад

There was a massive explosion that happened six years ago today in Beirut Lebanon. It was caused by the ignition of roughly 2,750 tons of improperly stored ammonium nitrate. Magnitude: Recognized as one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in modern history, creating a 43-meter-deep crater and sending shockwaves felt over 240 kilometers (150 miles) away in Cyprus.
1:44

There was a massive explosion that happened six years ago today in Beirut Lebanon. It was caused by the ignition of roughly 2,750 tons of improperly stored ammonium nitrate. Magnitude: Recognized as one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in modern history, creating a 43-meter-deep crater and sending shockwaves felt over 240 kilometers (150 miles) away in Cyprus.

Anonymous

138,324 просмотров • 8 дней назад

🇱🇧 The victims of the Beirut port explosion are calling for a march tomorrow to commemorate the 6th anniversary of the tragic event... At least 218 people died on August 4, 2020, when 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate detonated at Warehouse 12, a shipping storage facility at the Port of Beirut. More than 7,000 were injured. The incident was one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in human history, and perhaps the MOST powerful of the 21st century. The reason victims would like a march is to DEMAND progress in the investigation, because as of now not a SINGLE high-ranking official has been held criminally accountable or jailed for the disaster. Source: WF Witness (TG) / Writer: Michael
1:52

🇱🇧 The victims of the Beirut port explosion are calling for a march tomorrow to commemorate the 6th anniversary of the tragic event... At least 218 people died on August 4, 2020, when 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate detonated at Warehouse 12, a shipping storage facility at the Port of Beirut. More than 7,000 were injured. The incident was one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in human history, and perhaps the MOST powerful of the 21st century. The reason victims would like a march is to DEMAND progress in the investigation, because as of now not a SINGLE high-ranking official has been held criminally accountable or jailed for the disaster. Source: WF Witness (TG) / Writer: Michael

Mario Nawfal

48,553 просмотров • 10 дней назад

According to a report in Lebanon, Lebanese security agencies confiscated four drones that arrived at the port of Tripoli in northern Lebanon inside a container from China a few weeks ago. The shipment, declared as "agricultural irrigation equipment," was registered in the name of a fictitious company. Each drone could potentially carry 14 kg of explosives. The Lebanese authorities are examining whether they meet the technical standards for import into Lebanon. It is worth recalling that one of Hezbollah's main lessons from the war is a significant strengthening of its UAV and drone array. Assuming that the "importer" of the drones is Hezbollah, will the "revolving door" phenomenon occur here as well, and will the "goods" reach their destination anyway? It should be remembered that the relevant security agencies (General Security and Lebanese Army Intelligence) and Lebanese customs are infiltrated by Hezbollah. Lebanon has seven major seaports, with the port of Beirut being the largest, followed by the port of Tripoli. In our assessment, the port of Beirut remains a central anchor for Hezbollah smuggling through the maritime corridor, due to Hezbollah's control over activities at the port of Beirut (a "comfortable work environment" in terms of location, officials from the right community, numerous assistants, and the like). However, realizing that the maritime corridor has become its main route for smuggling into Lebanon, Hezbollah has begun to diversify its use of other Lebanese seaports, such as the port of Tripoli, in order to establish its smuggling array. Hezbollah's maritime smuggling route can reach Lebanon in two ways: The first is direct arrival at one of the seaports. The second: the smuggling vessel will not arrive directly in Lebanon but will stop at an agreed point in Lebanon's economic or territorial waters. A Hezbollah vessel (under civilian cover), departing from Lebanon, will rendezvous with it at sea for the purpose of transferring the smuggled cargo using the "back-to-back" method. Alternatively, there is a possibility that the smuggled cargo will be lowered into the sea using buoys, and then a Hezbollah vessel will arrive to collect the cargo.
0:56

According to a report in Lebanon, Lebanese security agencies confiscated four drones that arrived at the port of Tripoli in northern Lebanon inside a container from China a few weeks ago. The shipment, declared as "agricultural irrigation equipment," was registered in the name of a fictitious company. Each drone could potentially carry 14 kg of explosives. The Lebanese authorities are examining whether they meet the technical standards for import into Lebanon. It is worth recalling that one of Hezbollah's main lessons from the war is a significant strengthening of its UAV and drone array. Assuming that the "importer" of the drones is Hezbollah, will the "revolving door" phenomenon occur here as well, and will the "goods" reach their destination anyway? It should be remembered that the relevant security agencies (General Security and Lebanese Army Intelligence) and Lebanese customs are infiltrated by Hezbollah. Lebanon has seven major seaports, with the port of Beirut being the largest, followed by the port of Tripoli. In our assessment, the port of Beirut remains a central anchor for Hezbollah smuggling through the maritime corridor, due to Hezbollah's control over activities at the port of Beirut (a "comfortable work environment" in terms of location, officials from the right community, numerous assistants, and the like). However, realizing that the maritime corridor has become its main route for smuggling into Lebanon, Hezbollah has begun to diversify its use of other Lebanese seaports, such as the port of Tripoli, in order to establish its smuggling array. Hezbollah's maritime smuggling route can reach Lebanon in two ways: The first is direct arrival at one of the seaports. The second: the smuggling vessel will not arrive directly in Lebanon but will stop at an agreed point in Lebanon's economic or territorial waters. A Hezbollah vessel (under civilian cover), departing from Lebanon, will rendezvous with it at sea for the purpose of transferring the smuggled cargo using the "back-to-back" method. Alternatively, there is a possibility that the smuggled cargo will be lowered into the sea using buoys, and then a Hezbollah vessel will arrive to collect the cargo.

Israel-Alma

51,815 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Like the Lebanese army, the Internal Security Forces are unable to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. The “Hezbollah state” has the power to arrest (in effect, kidnap) members of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces and negotiate with the Lebanese state for their release. On January 23, 2026, a police patrol of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces, ISF (قوى الامن الداخلي ) stopped two Hezbollah trucks in the Al-Tayoune (الطيونة) area of Beirut, near a police station and military base. The trucks were parked suspiciously, had no license plates, and had tinted windows. When the police patrol approached to check the trucks, Hezbollah operatives attacked the patrol. At the end of the confrontation, Hezbollah operatives detained one of the security forces personnel and managed to prevent the patrol from uncovering the contents of the trucks. According to local reports, the trucks were carrying Hezbollah military equipment that had been smuggled from Syria through one of the illegal border crossings with Lebanon. The Hezbollah trucks continued on their way toward the “security square” in Dahiya. In light of the incident, negotiations began between the State of Lebanon and the “State of Hezbollah.” Hezbollah's representative in the negotiations was Ali Ayoub, head of Hezbollah's Security Committee, which is in effect the independent police force of the “State of Hezbollah.” Following the negotiations, Hezbollah released the security forces officer it had detained and promised to hand over the trucks to the security forces at a “later date.” In practice, this means that the trucks and their contents will not be handed over to the security forces. The Hezbollah operatives involved were not arrested or investigated. Hezbollah does as it pleases in Lebanon. This is yet another test case, this time in the context of internal security forces, which demonstrates the inability of the Lebanese security forces in general to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. Attached is a report from the Lebanese "MTV" channel about the incident.
1:55

Like the Lebanese army, the Internal Security Forces are unable to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. The “Hezbollah state” has the power to arrest (in effect, kidnap) members of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces and negotiate with the Lebanese state for their release. On January 23, 2026, a police patrol of the Lebanese Internal Security Forces, ISF (قوى الامن الداخلي ) stopped two Hezbollah trucks in the Al-Tayoune (الطيونة) area of Beirut, near a police station and military base. The trucks were parked suspiciously, had no license plates, and had tinted windows. When the police patrol approached to check the trucks, Hezbollah operatives attacked the patrol. At the end of the confrontation, Hezbollah operatives detained one of the security forces personnel and managed to prevent the patrol from uncovering the contents of the trucks. According to local reports, the trucks were carrying Hezbollah military equipment that had been smuggled from Syria through one of the illegal border crossings with Lebanon. The Hezbollah trucks continued on their way toward the “security square” in Dahiya. In light of the incident, negotiations began between the State of Lebanon and the “State of Hezbollah.” Hezbollah's representative in the negotiations was Ali Ayoub, head of Hezbollah's Security Committee, which is in effect the independent police force of the “State of Hezbollah.” Following the negotiations, Hezbollah released the security forces officer it had detained and promised to hand over the trucks to the security forces at a “later date.” In practice, this means that the trucks and their contents will not be handed over to the security forces. The Hezbollah operatives involved were not arrested or investigated. Hezbollah does as it pleases in Lebanon. This is yet another test case, this time in the context of internal security forces, which demonstrates the inability of the Lebanese security forces in general to confront Hezbollah on the issue of weapons. Attached is a report from the Lebanese "MTV" channel about the incident.

Israel-Alma

13,488 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺🇰🇵 NATO SUNK A RUSSIAN SHIP WITH A TORPEDO!? An investigation into the sinking of the cargo ship Ursa Major in 2024 in the Mediterranean Sea shows the ship was attacked! The Russian ship was carrying important cargo to North Korea, but it was sunk last year. According to the investigation, the ship was carrying two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker of the 10510 project being built. The ship departed from St. Petersburg and was heading to Vladivostok via the Mediterranean Sea. The official cargo included two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker and two German 380-tonne mobile port cranes Liebherr 420, which were to be installed in the port of Vladivostok. On December 22, explosions occurred on the ship, and on the 23rd, it sank. An inspection of the damage showed a hole in the hull with a deformation of the metal inward, which indicates a hit from the outside, not an internal explosion. The investigation suggests that armor-piercing torpedoes were used. -> Who is able to sink ships with torpedoes off the coast of Spain? The answer is simple. The crew was rescued by Spain and the captain of the ship was interrogated there. 1/
1:19

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺🇰🇵 NATO SUNK A RUSSIAN SHIP WITH A TORPEDO!? An investigation into the sinking of the cargo ship Ursa Major in 2024 in the Mediterranean Sea shows the ship was attacked! The Russian ship was carrying important cargo to North Korea, but it was sunk last year. According to the investigation, the ship was carrying two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker of the 10510 project being built. The ship departed from St. Petersburg and was heading to Vladivostok via the Mediterranean Sea. The official cargo included two 45-tonne nuclear reactor covers for a nuclear icebreaker and two German 380-tonne mobile port cranes Liebherr 420, which were to be installed in the port of Vladivostok. On December 22, explosions occurred on the ship, and on the 23rd, it sank. An inspection of the damage showed a hole in the hull with a deformation of the metal inward, which indicates a hit from the outside, not an internal explosion. The investigation suggests that armor-piercing torpedoes were used. -> Who is able to sink ships with torpedoes off the coast of Spain? The answer is simple. The crew was rescued by Spain and the captain of the ship was interrogated there. 1/

Lord Bebo

33,131 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

A narrative of an unjust attack by the United States on the IRIS Dena warship in the Indian Ocean “Hamed Momeneh,” one of the sailors on the Dena warship: This vessel had been sent to the port of Visakhapatnam in India to take part in a naval exercise. While returning home, and as the ship was sailing in international waters of the Indian Ocean, it came under attack. It was around 3:00 to 3:30 a.m. when we were suddenly attacked—an attack that was completely against international maritime laws. It was not a war zone, and we had received no warning. The attack was carried out without warning by a submarine. When the first torpedo hit, all personnel were at their posts, and fortunately at that moment we had no casualties. There were 104 crew members on board, and no one left the ship. Everyone stood their ground until the end. If their aim had only been to damage the ship, they could have targeted other parts, but the main goal was to kill the crew. Even so, we stood firm to the end. For us, the Dena was like the soil of Iran, and leaving it had no meaning. The forces remained with the vessel until 11 pm, after which they were forced to swim for some distance in the ocean to reach areas near the coast of Sri Lanka.
4:56

A narrative of an unjust attack by the United States on the IRIS Dena warship in the Indian Ocean “Hamed Momeneh,” one of the sailors on the Dena warship: This vessel had been sent to the port of Visakhapatnam in India to take part in a naval exercise. While returning home, and as the ship was sailing in international waters of the Indian Ocean, it came under attack. It was around 3:00 to 3:30 a.m. when we were suddenly attacked—an attack that was completely against international maritime laws. It was not a war zone, and we had received no warning. The attack was carried out without warning by a submarine. When the first torpedo hit, all personnel were at their posts, and fortunately at that moment we had no casualties. There were 104 crew members on board, and no one left the ship. Everyone stood their ground until the end. If their aim had only been to damage the ship, they could have targeted other parts, but the main goal was to kill the crew. Even so, we stood firm to the end. For us, the Dena was like the soil of Iran, and leaving it had no meaning. The forces remained with the vessel until 11 pm, after which they were forced to swim for some distance in the ocean to reach areas near the coast of Sri Lanka.

Iran in India

189,841 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🎥 NEW: Hezbollah expert Amal Saad on the new “framework” between Israel and Lebanon: “I think it’s not an exaggeration to say… it transcends even the Abraham Accords… and it resembles much more closely an alliance treaty… not a proper alliance… [but] an alliance that exclusively actually serves Israel and the authorities, not the Lebanese state.” “It de-centers Israel as the source of the problem… of instability and war… and centers the response to the occupation, the resistance to the occupation, as the central challenge to be confronted.” “What the Lebanese authorities are doing here is calling on Israel, the enemy state according to Lebanese law,an enemy state for decades, to come and help them expunge the resistance from Lebanon.” jeremy scahill | Amal Saad
5:21

🎥 NEW: Hezbollah expert Amal Saad on the new “framework” between Israel and Lebanon: “I think it’s not an exaggeration to say… it transcends even the Abraham Accords… and it resembles much more closely an alliance treaty… not a proper alliance… [but] an alliance that exclusively actually serves Israel and the authorities, not the Lebanese state.” “It de-centers Israel as the source of the problem… of instability and war… and centers the response to the occupation, the resistance to the occupation, as the central challenge to be confronted.” “What the Lebanese authorities are doing here is calling on Israel, the enemy state according to Lebanese law,an enemy state for decades, to come and help them expunge the resistance from Lebanon.” jeremy scahill | Amal Saad

Drop Site

89,136 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

⚡️🚨 BREAKING: Hezbollah announces that it struck an Israeli warship in the coast of Lebanon: “Now, in the open sea, the Israeli warship that attacked our infrastructure, our homes, and our civilians—look at it burning.” In defense of Lebanon and its people, and in response to the Israeli enemy’s continued bombardment of villages and cities, destruction of infrastructure, and displacement of civilians, the mujahideen of the Islamic Resistance targeted an Israeli warship at 00:05 on Sunday, April 5, 2026. The warship was 68 nautical miles off the Lebanese coast and was preparing to launch attacks on Lebanese territory. The targeting operation was carried out with a naval cruise missile after the target had been monitored for hours, and a direct hit was confirmed. Victory comes only from God, the Almighty, the Wise. Sunday, April 5, 2026 16 Shawwal 1447 AH
3:04

⚡️🚨 BREAKING: Hezbollah announces that it struck an Israeli warship in the coast of Lebanon: “Now, in the open sea, the Israeli warship that attacked our infrastructure, our homes, and our civilians—look at it burning.” In defense of Lebanon and its people, and in response to the Israeli enemy’s continued bombardment of villages and cities, destruction of infrastructure, and displacement of civilians, the mujahideen of the Islamic Resistance targeted an Israeli warship at 00:05 on Sunday, April 5, 2026. The warship was 68 nautical miles off the Lebanese coast and was preparing to launch attacks on Lebanese territory. The targeting operation was carried out with a naval cruise missile after the target had been monitored for hours, and a direct hit was confirmed. Victory comes only from God, the Almighty, the Wise. Sunday, April 5, 2026 16 Shawwal 1447 AH

Middle East Observer

315,471 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

On Lebanese talkshow صار الوقت with Marcel Ghanem: 1. If Hezbollah is winning and beating Israel like it claims, then why is it dying to stop the war and be part of the Iran ceasefire? Why not go on and win back all the land from Israel? If the war stops this minute, at least 300,000 Lebanese won't be able to return to the buffer zone in south Lebanon. 2. The Lebanese keep on saying "Israeli aggression" while in reality, in 2006, 2023, 2026, Hezbollah was always the aggressor, the one that started the war. Also, from an international law perspective, Israel is in the clear defending itself while Lebanon is in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 (disarm Hezbollah). 3. Hezbollah chief Qassem published a book called The Resistance State that a government coexists with an armed non-state actor against global imperialism. Israel wants this model dead. Either Lebanon becomes a normal sovereign state responsible for any violence that originates from its territory, or Israel will keep a buffer zone like in Gaza until Hezbollah surrenders its arms. 4. Hezbollah surrendering its arms to win back land is great. After all the goal is for Shia to live in their land in peace. The goal is not to keep the arms. The arms is a tool and if throwing it away achieve the goal, then be it. 5. Disarming Hezbollah doesn't have to be war, it requires Lebanese political consensus to ask Hezbollah to surrender its arms to the army. It succeeded in 1982 when the Lebanese asked Arafat to leave Lebanon to stop the war with Israel. It succeeded in 2005 when the Lebanese ejected Assad's army from their country.
5:03

On Lebanese talkshow صار الوقت with Marcel Ghanem: 1. If Hezbollah is winning and beating Israel like it claims, then why is it dying to stop the war and be part of the Iran ceasefire? Why not go on and win back all the land from Israel? If the war stops this minute, at least 300,000 Lebanese won't be able to return to the buffer zone in south Lebanon. 2. The Lebanese keep on saying "Israeli aggression" while in reality, in 2006, 2023, 2026, Hezbollah was always the aggressor, the one that started the war. Also, from an international law perspective, Israel is in the clear defending itself while Lebanon is in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701 (disarm Hezbollah). 3. Hezbollah chief Qassem published a book called The Resistance State that a government coexists with an armed non-state actor against global imperialism. Israel wants this model dead. Either Lebanon becomes a normal sovereign state responsible for any violence that originates from its territory, or Israel will keep a buffer zone like in Gaza until Hezbollah surrenders its arms. 4. Hezbollah surrendering its arms to win back land is great. After all the goal is for Shia to live in their land in peace. The goal is not to keep the arms. The arms is a tool and if throwing it away achieve the goal, then be it. 5. Disarming Hezbollah doesn't have to be war, it requires Lebanese political consensus to ask Hezbollah to surrender its arms to the army. It succeeded in 1982 when the Lebanese asked Arafat to leave Lebanon to stop the war with Israel. It succeeded in 2005 when the Lebanese ejected Assad's army from their country.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain

37,268 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇻🇦🇱🇧 At the beginning of last December (November 30 – December 2, 2025), Lebanon hosted one of the most meaningful and touching visits in its history. Pope Leo XIV was in Beirut for one of his first overseas trips, seeking to share in the sorrows of the Lebanese people and to cultivate hope. The most unforgettable moment of the visit was the massive turnout that persisted despite the heavy rain. Even as they were drenched under thunder and downpours, tens of thousands of Lebanese people did not leave the area for a single moment. At the official ceremony at the Presidential Palace, the traditional Lebanese Dabke dances performed under the raindrops proved the resilience and hospitality of the local culture to the entire world once again.
0:31

🇻🇦🇱🇧 At the beginning of last December (November 30 – December 2, 2025), Lebanon hosted one of the most meaningful and touching visits in its history. Pope Leo XIV was in Beirut for one of his first overseas trips, seeking to share in the sorrows of the Lebanese people and to cultivate hope. The most unforgettable moment of the visit was the massive turnout that persisted despite the heavy rain. Even as they were drenched under thunder and downpours, tens of thousands of Lebanese people did not leave the area for a single moment. At the official ceremony at the Presidential Palace, the traditional Lebanese Dabke dances performed under the raindrops proved the resilience and hospitality of the local culture to the entire world once again.

MENA Visuals

39,395 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🎥 Lebanese Christians enjoying their vacation in Jerusalem in 1977. A forgotten time when Lebanese pilgrims walked the streets of the Holy City openly and peacefully. It is important to note that, legally speaking, Israel itself was never the state preventing Lebanese citizens from entering it. The restriction came from the Lebanese side through the Lebanese Boycott Law against Israel, adopted on June 23rd, 1955, which criminalized direct and indirect dealings and contact with Israelis. Today, this outdated law should be repealed. Lebanese Christians - and Muslims by the way - should have the right to visit Jerusalem and pray at their holy sites.
1:47

🎥 Lebanese Christians enjoying their vacation in Jerusalem in 1977. A forgotten time when Lebanese pilgrims walked the streets of the Holy City openly and peacefully. It is important to note that, legally speaking, Israel itself was never the state preventing Lebanese citizens from entering it. The restriction came from the Lebanese side through the Lebanese Boycott Law against Israel, adopted on June 23rd, 1955, which criminalized direct and indirect dealings and contact with Israelis. Today, this outdated law should be repealed. Lebanese Christians - and Muslims by the way - should have the right to visit Jerusalem and pray at their holy sites.

Mark Elian | مارك اليان

20,032 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Question: What about Lebanon? Is Lebanon going to be part of a deal? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Lebanon we’re working on separately. With Lebanon we are engaged now. We have a 45-day ceasefire. We’ve had weekly meetings now and ongoing daily engagements between the government of Lebanon and Israel. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel. The problem is Hezbollah. Just last night Hezbollah put out a statement calling for the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you who you’re dealing with here - by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100% Iranian proxy. And as long as an armed Hezbollah exists, it’s going to be hard to achieve peace in Lebanon because they’re victimizing the people of Lebanon. They’re not just attacking Israel. But we’re working that track with the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. And we’ve made some good progress there - an extended ceasefire, a path forward. We’re going to continue to work on that. Hezbollah is a terrorist group.” Question: "Would it be an understanding that Israel wouldn’t strike Lebanon as part of the deal?” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. So if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood during the ceasefire, and it will be understood beyond that."
1:22

Question: What about Lebanon? Is Lebanon going to be part of a deal? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Lebanon we’re working on separately. With Lebanon we are engaged now. We have a 45-day ceasefire. We’ve had weekly meetings now and ongoing daily engagements between the government of Lebanon and Israel. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel. The problem is Hezbollah. Just last night Hezbollah put out a statement calling for the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you who you’re dealing with here - by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100% Iranian proxy. And as long as an armed Hezbollah exists, it’s going to be hard to achieve peace in Lebanon because they’re victimizing the people of Lebanon. They’re not just attacking Israel. But we’re working that track with the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. And we’ve made some good progress there - an extended ceasefire, a path forward. We’re going to continue to work on that. Hezbollah is a terrorist group.” Question: "Would it be an understanding that Israel wouldn’t strike Lebanon as part of the deal?” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. So if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood during the ceasefire, and it will be understood beyond that."

Open Source Intel

59,882 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🟡 Hezbollah MP Ibrahim Al-Mousawi: “No one can disagree that the official authorities should have a monopoly on arms — this is one of the definitions of a state. But one of the most important functions of any state is to defend and protect its people. This is what the army should do. This is their duty. What happened in Lebanon is that at no point has Lebanon had an army equipped enough, or one given the political decision by its leaders, to defend or protect Lebanon. This happened again this time — the Lebanese authorities issued orders to the Lebanese army to withdraw from its positions. The villagers of southern Lebanon, Christians, Muslims, were begging the army to stay. The head of the army himself said, ‘I have many different scenarios I can use to defend or to protect.’ But the officials ordered the army not to fight back, not to protect, not to defend, simply to withdraw... The normal function has not been performed by the government or the army. … And more importantly — how did the resistance come about? Why did we go to fight the occupation, to try to liberate, to protect, to defend? Was the Lebanese army there and we just pushed them aside? Of course not. There was a vacuum, a negligence, a recklessness, an abandonment of the people. As long as the occupation continues, the resistance will continue. The resistance has every right to fight back. If the Lebanese army were equipped well enough to fight back, it’s not a hobby that we want to do. It’s not that we want to be killed or whatever. There was a job to be done. The army didn’t do it. The state didn’t do it… We are doing it. We should be thanked for what we are doing, and not delegitimized because of this.” jeremy scahill | Ibrahim Al Moussawi
6:47

🟡 Hezbollah MP Ibrahim Al-Mousawi: “No one can disagree that the official authorities should have a monopoly on arms — this is one of the definitions of a state. But one of the most important functions of any state is to defend and protect its people. This is what the army should do. This is their duty. What happened in Lebanon is that at no point has Lebanon had an army equipped enough, or one given the political decision by its leaders, to defend or protect Lebanon. This happened again this time — the Lebanese authorities issued orders to the Lebanese army to withdraw from its positions. The villagers of southern Lebanon, Christians, Muslims, were begging the army to stay. The head of the army himself said, ‘I have many different scenarios I can use to defend or to protect.’ But the officials ordered the army not to fight back, not to protect, not to defend, simply to withdraw... The normal function has not been performed by the government or the army. … And more importantly — how did the resistance come about? Why did we go to fight the occupation, to try to liberate, to protect, to defend? Was the Lebanese army there and we just pushed them aside? Of course not. There was a vacuum, a negligence, a recklessness, an abandonment of the people. As long as the occupation continues, the resistance will continue. The resistance has every right to fight back. If the Lebanese army were equipped well enough to fight back, it’s not a hobby that we want to do. It’s not that we want to be killed or whatever. There was a job to be done. The army didn’t do it. The state didn’t do it… We are doing it. We should be thanked for what we are doing, and not delegitimized because of this.” jeremy scahill | Ibrahim Al Moussawi

Drop Site

85,882 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🟡 BREAKING: Hezbollah claims missile and drone barrage targeting Haifa, northern Israel. The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon said it launched a barrage of “advanced missiles” and a swarm of drones at the Mishmar al-Karmel missile defense site south of Haifa at midnight between Sunday and Monday, March 2. The group said the attack was in retaliation for the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and in response to the ongoing Israeli aggression against Lebanon. The statement described the strike as a “legitimate defensive action” and warned Israel it cannot continue its 15-month campaign “without a response to halt its aggression and withdraw from the occupied Lebanese territories.” An Israeli military official confirmed launches from Lebanon. Al Jazeera aired footage showing missiles fired from Beirut.
1:04

🚨🟡 BREAKING: Hezbollah claims missile and drone barrage targeting Haifa, northern Israel. The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon said it launched a barrage of “advanced missiles” and a swarm of drones at the Mishmar al-Karmel missile defense site south of Haifa at midnight between Sunday and Monday, March 2. The group said the attack was in retaliation for the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and in response to the ongoing Israeli aggression against Lebanon. The statement described the strike as a “legitimate defensive action” and warned Israel it cannot continue its 15-month campaign “without a response to halt its aggression and withdraw from the occupied Lebanese territories.” An Israeli military official confirmed launches from Lebanon. Al Jazeera aired footage showing missiles fired from Beirut.

Drop Site

237,358 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

WATCH⚡️ Israel’s UN ambassador, Danny Danon, surprised the Lebanese representative by addressing the Lebanese people in Arabic, saying: “Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.” “Israel has no desire to be in Southern Lebanon. Our goal is to protect our people, not to occupy Lebanese territory. But to prevent this from happening again, the council must ensure the right mechanisms are in place for the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL meets their obligations. I wish to address the Lebanese representative, mister Rasham. I have listened to your words and condemnations very carefully. But the truth is you should be sitting next to me, not next to the Iranian representative. Because whether you can admit it or not, Israel, Lebanon, and the free world are on the same side against the Islamic regime of Iran. All of us should declare, shoulder to shoulder, that Iran must keep its blood stained hands off Lebanon. And I would like to to approach the the Lebanese people. I will do it in Arabic. Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.”
1:22

WATCH⚡️ Israel’s UN ambassador, Danny Danon, surprised the Lebanese representative by addressing the Lebanese people in Arabic, saying: “Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.” “Israel has no desire to be in Southern Lebanon. Our goal is to protect our people, not to occupy Lebanese territory. But to prevent this from happening again, the council must ensure the right mechanisms are in place for the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL meets their obligations. I wish to address the Lebanese representative, mister Rasham. I have listened to your words and condemnations very carefully. But the truth is you should be sitting next to me, not next to the Iranian representative. Because whether you can admit it or not, Israel, Lebanon, and the free world are on the same side against the Islamic regime of Iran. All of us should declare, shoulder to shoulder, that Iran must keep its blood stained hands off Lebanon. And I would like to to approach the the Lebanese people. I will do it in Arabic. Lebanon belongs to the Lebanese, not to the Iranians.”

Open Source Intel

340,428 просмотров • 1 год назад