Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

6’4 DD slim thick red bone🫦 Bronx NY📍

sweet__sirens's profile picture

sweet sirens💋🤤

9,804 subscribers

71,684 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

📍 Bronx, NY
0:20

📍 Bronx, NY

Baltimore Orioles

16,531 次观看 • 3 个月前

NEW CATCH 📍 Bronx, NY Full video on locals - link in bio
0:21

Sensitive content

NEW CATCH 📍 Bronx, NY Full video on locals - link in bio

JayCarnicomDAP

3,729,230 次观看 • 2 年前

Gyatdamn Super thick Big booty red bone girl 😍😍😍🤤🤤🤤 type of ass you gotta eat before you cream pie her 😏😏😏
3:04

Gyatdamn Super thick Big booty red bone girl 😍😍😍🤤🤤🤤 type of ass you gotta eat before you cream pie her 😏😏😏

Donkexpert

10,355 次观看 • 1 个月前

Megan Thee Stallion officially opens her first Popeyes restaurant in Miami with a special ribbon-cutting ceremony.✂️ She'll also launch Thee Megan Meal, an exclusive combo meal at her franchise that includes a chicken sandwich, 3-piece tenders, 6-piece bone-in wings, red beans and rice, along with mac and cheese. Megan’s Popeyes restaurant is located in Miami Beach at 1427 Washington Avenue.📍
0:47

Megan Thee Stallion officially opens her first Popeyes restaurant in Miami with a special ribbon-cutting ceremony.✂️ She'll also launch Thee Megan Meal, an exclusive combo meal at her franchise that includes a chicken sandwich, 3-piece tenders, 6-piece bone-in wings, red beans and rice, along with mac and cheese. Megan’s Popeyes restaurant is located in Miami Beach at 1427 Washington Avenue.📍

XXL Magazine

680,074 次观看 • 7 个月前

Source: Tangledtitty🛸 💭 think tank Location: 📍Bronx, NY USA 🇺🇸 Multiple UFO UAP Orbs seen hovering over the city.👀🛸 We are way beyond the drone sightings at this point. We have a full scale NHI presence here on earth that is fully showing themselves! They are no longer hiding which means they want the regular population to know they are here. Something happened where they have to change their behaviour, this could be huge. Seen on X
1:18

Source: Tangledtitty🛸 💭 think tank Location: 📍Bronx, NY USA 🇺🇸 Multiple UFO UAP Orbs seen hovering over the city.👀🛸 We are way beyond the drone sightings at this point. We have a full scale NHI presence here on earth that is fully showing themselves! They are no longer hiding which means they want the regular population to know they are here. Something happened where they have to change their behaviour, this could be huge. Seen on X

Just

153,130 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE – NYPD Precinct Commander Jeremy Scheublin Accused of Violent S*x Crime Against Black Female Officer 📍 Bronx, NY He said “I want to make biracial babies with you” while forcing himself on her. She had to Kick him In The Balls & scream “Chill the f–k out!” to stop him from R*PING her. NYPD knew about this violent sex crime for OVER A YEAR but PROMOTED him anyway, transferred him, and he just picked up a “Man of the Year” award. He even warned her “it didn’t go well for the last person who accused me.”
1:01

Sensitive content

🚨 EXCLUSIVE – NYPD Precinct Commander Jeremy Scheublin Accused of Violent S*x Crime Against Black Female Officer 📍 Bronx, NY He said “I want to make biracial babies with you” while forcing himself on her. She had to Kick him In The Balls & scream “Chill the f–k out!” to stop him from R*PING her. NYPD knew about this violent sex crime for OVER A YEAR but PROMOTED him anyway, transferred him, and he just picked up a “Man of the Year” award. He even warned her “it didn’t go well for the last person who accused me.”

i Expose Racists & Pedos

118,425 次观看 • 5 个月前

📍 Feast your eyes: a fresh batch of cities where I’ll be yelling jokes at strangers! Indianapolis, IN // DEC 5, 6, 7 San Jose, CA // DEC 11 Burlington, VT // DEC 18, 19, 20, 21 NEW! San Francisco, CA // JAN 30 NEW! London, UK // FEB 20 Chicago, IL // FEB 26, 27, 28 Madison, WI // MAR 27 Milwaukee, WI // MAR 28 Royal Oak, MI // MAR 29 OKC, OK // APR 23 Kansas City, MO // APR 24 Minneapolis, MN // APR 25 NEW! Concord, NH // SEP 11 NEW! Boston, MA // SEP 12 NEW! Providence, RI // SEP 13 Philadelphia, PA // OCT 2 Washington, DC // OCT 3 NEW! Munhall, PA // OCT 4 NEW! Spokane, WA // OCT 15 NEW! Seattle, WA // OCT 17 St Louis, MO // OCT 23 Cleveland, OH // OCT 25 NEW! Santa Fe, NM // NOV 6 NEW! Tucson, AZ // NOV 7 NEW! Tempe, AZ // NOV 8 NEW! Syracuse, NY // NOV 12 NEW! Albany, NY // NOV 13 NEW! Buffalo, NY // NOV 14 NEW! Red Bank, NJ // NOV 22 ✨ Check your city, grab your tickets at
0:57

📍 Feast your eyes: a fresh batch of cities where I’ll be yelling jokes at strangers! Indianapolis, IN // DEC 5, 6, 7 San Jose, CA // DEC 11 Burlington, VT // DEC 18, 19, 20, 21 NEW! San Francisco, CA // JAN 30 NEW! London, UK // FEB 20 Chicago, IL // FEB 26, 27, 28 Madison, WI // MAR 27 Milwaukee, WI // MAR 28 Royal Oak, MI // MAR 29 OKC, OK // APR 23 Kansas City, MO // APR 24 Minneapolis, MN // APR 25 NEW! Concord, NH // SEP 11 NEW! Boston, MA // SEP 12 NEW! Providence, RI // SEP 13 Philadelphia, PA // OCT 2 Washington, DC // OCT 3 NEW! Munhall, PA // OCT 4 NEW! Spokane, WA // OCT 15 NEW! Seattle, WA // OCT 17 St Louis, MO // OCT 23 Cleveland, OH // OCT 25 NEW! Santa Fe, NM // NOV 6 NEW! Tucson, AZ // NOV 7 NEW! Tempe, AZ // NOV 8 NEW! Syracuse, NY // NOV 12 NEW! Albany, NY // NOV 13 NEW! Buffalo, NY // NOV 14 NEW! Red Bank, NJ // NOV 22 ✨ Check your city, grab your tickets at

Maria Bamford

12,818 次观看 • 8 个月前

Ogura toast 📍Kurume City, Fukuoka, Japan 🇯🇵 Video: JOKERグルメ【Secret Groumet Information】 Ogura Toast is a beloved Japanese breakfast dish originating from Nagoya, consisting of thick-cut toasted bread topped with a layer of butter and sweet red bean paste (called ogura-an, made from adzuki beans). It’s often served in kissaten (traditional Japanese cafés), especially as part of a morning set with coffee. The combination of salty butter and sweet bean paste creates a comforting, balanced flavor that’s simple yet iconic in Japanese café culture.
0:43

Ogura toast 📍Kurume City, Fukuoka, Japan 🇯🇵 Video: JOKERグルメ【Secret Groumet Information】 Ogura Toast is a beloved Japanese breakfast dish originating from Nagoya, consisting of thick-cut toasted bread topped with a layer of butter and sweet red bean paste (called ogura-an, made from adzuki beans). It’s often served in kissaten (traditional Japanese cafés), especially as part of a morning set with coffee. The combination of salty butter and sweet bean paste creates a comforting, balanced flavor that’s simple yet iconic in Japanese café culture.

TasteAtlas

14,484 次观看 • 1 年前

The Dirty Cabbage Ingredients 1 Ib ground beef 1 lb Italian sausage 1 small onion, diced 1 green bell pepper, diced 1 red bell pepper, diced 2 tbsp tomato paste 3 cloves garlic, minced 2 tsp Worcestershire sauce 1 cup chicken bone broth 1 tsp cornstarch with 2 tbsp water (to create a slurry) 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp onion powder 1 tsp smoked paprika ½ tsp black pepper ½ tsp salt 1 large green cabbage 1 tbsp chopped fresh parsley Instructions Remove any damaged outer cabbage leaves and cut the cabbage into 1-inch-thick steaks or large wedges, keeping the core intact so they hold together. In a large saute pan, Cook your ground beef and sausage until cooked. Add onion and bell peppers, garlic powder, onion powder, smoked paprika, salt, and pepper. Add tomato paste and Worcestershire sauce. Saute until everything is combined. Add your tomato paste, Kettle and Fire chicken bone broth. Stir in the garlic, Worcestershire sauce, and your slurry. Add your cabbage, cover the pan and mix until your cabbage has cooked down. Serve with cauliflower rice. 🎥 | IG
0:36

The Dirty Cabbage Ingredients 1 Ib ground beef 1 lb Italian sausage 1 small onion, diced 1 green bell pepper, diced 1 red bell pepper, diced 2 tbsp tomato paste 3 cloves garlic, minced 2 tsp Worcestershire sauce 1 cup chicken bone broth 1 tsp cornstarch with 2 tbsp water (to create a slurry) 1 tsp garlic powder 1 tsp onion powder 1 tsp smoked paprika ½ tsp black pepper ½ tsp salt 1 large green cabbage 1 tbsp chopped fresh parsley Instructions Remove any damaged outer cabbage leaves and cut the cabbage into 1-inch-thick steaks or large wedges, keeping the core intact so they hold together. In a large saute pan, Cook your ground beef and sausage until cooked. Add onion and bell peppers, garlic powder, onion powder, smoked paprika, salt, and pepper. Add tomato paste and Worcestershire sauce. Saute until everything is combined. Add your tomato paste, Kettle and Fire chicken bone broth. Stir in the garlic, Worcestershire sauce, and your slurry. Add your cabbage, cover the pan and mix until your cabbage has cooked down. Serve with cauliflower rice. 🎥 | IG

𝕏 Cuisines

442,712 次观看 • 13 天前

Liberal white women have the survival instincts of a goldfish. Have you noticed the spate of attacks on white lefty women by the migrants they’re helping? Pro-Palestine activist Jamie Carney was found bludgeoned to death, apparently by her Jordanian boyfriend Ahmad Al-Saqar, after falling for cheesy romantic patter that a man selling plastic roses outside a bar in Tenerife would consider over the top. Scottish woman Elizabeth-Jane Ross was working with a Christian NGO providing support to refugees from Afghanistan when she was brutally killed and dumped in a suitcase, apparently by an Afghan migrant. They’re coming so thick and fast that in the days since I recorded this video, a Spanish woman who worked for the Red Cross has been bludgeoned to death - the main suspect, her Moroccan partner. And when you see the footage emerging from Ceuta and other places where NGOs assist migrants to enter Europe, it starts to make sense. These NGOs seem to be exclusively staffed by liberal white women. I know a prevailing theory is that this is because liberal women don’t have kids, so their maternal instincts get curdled and directed at people they think need mothering (illegal migrants). People have written books about this “suicidal empathy”. But I think it’s because liberal women need attention. It’s top of their Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, above oxygen or water or makeup. Previously they got attention from men who wanted to bone them. Then, during #MeToo, they realised they could get even more attention by condemning men who wanted to bone them. They got called “brave” and there was lots of drama - maximum attention. But this made the men who wanted to bone them stop trying to bone them. They swapped the constant long-term attention of men trying to bone them for the short-term attention of condemning the men. By importing low IQ men from the third world who aren’t attuned to the Western cultural changes of the last thirty years, they’ve got a new source of men who want to bone them, so they get that attention again. Also, we’ve got to stop calling it “suicidal empathy.” It’s “homicidal empathy.” The leftists know that most of the negative impact is going to fall on other people. It’s the ultimate socialism. The lefty gets the benefit of virtue signalling, but the negative consequences are shared by everyone. It’s better that this externality is internalised. Although it’s a harsh lesson to learn, at least these women died doing what they love: helping a marginalised minority achieve his dreams.
9:03

Liberal white women have the survival instincts of a goldfish. Have you noticed the spate of attacks on white lefty women by the migrants they’re helping? Pro-Palestine activist Jamie Carney was found bludgeoned to death, apparently by her Jordanian boyfriend Ahmad Al-Saqar, after falling for cheesy romantic patter that a man selling plastic roses outside a bar in Tenerife would consider over the top. Scottish woman Elizabeth-Jane Ross was working with a Christian NGO providing support to refugees from Afghanistan when she was brutally killed and dumped in a suitcase, apparently by an Afghan migrant. They’re coming so thick and fast that in the days since I recorded this video, a Spanish woman who worked for the Red Cross has been bludgeoned to death - the main suspect, her Moroccan partner. And when you see the footage emerging from Ceuta and other places where NGOs assist migrants to enter Europe, it starts to make sense. These NGOs seem to be exclusively staffed by liberal white women. I know a prevailing theory is that this is because liberal women don’t have kids, so their maternal instincts get curdled and directed at people they think need mothering (illegal migrants). People have written books about this “suicidal empathy”. But I think it’s because liberal women need attention. It’s top of their Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, above oxygen or water or makeup. Previously they got attention from men who wanted to bone them. Then, during #MeToo, they realised they could get even more attention by condemning men who wanted to bone them. They got called “brave” and there was lots of drama - maximum attention. But this made the men who wanted to bone them stop trying to bone them. They swapped the constant long-term attention of men trying to bone them for the short-term attention of condemning the men. By importing low IQ men from the third world who aren’t attuned to the Western cultural changes of the last thirty years, they’ve got a new source of men who want to bone them, so they get that attention again. Also, we’ve got to stop calling it “suicidal empathy.” It’s “homicidal empathy.” The leftists know that most of the negative impact is going to fall on other people. It’s the ultimate socialism. The lefty gets the benefit of virtue signalling, but the negative consequences are shared by everyone. It’s better that this externality is internalised. Although it’s a harsh lesson to learn, at least these women died doing what they love: helping a marginalised minority achieve his dreams.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

24,159 次观看 • 2 天前

Facial reconstructions of 14,000-year-old Oberkassel WHGs The Magdalenian culture, which followed the Solutrean, dates to the end of the Ice Age. Initially, the climate was cold and humid, resembling modern tundra, with mammoths, reindeer, musk oxen, hares, and ptarmigans. During the Middle Magdalenian, conditions became colder and drier as steppe expanded northward. Mammoths disappeared, reindeer retreated north, and horses, saiga antelopes, jerboas, and Asiatic wild asses became the dominant fauna. People increasingly occupied caves, while polychrome cave art reached its peak at sites such as Altamira and Font-de-Gaume. Flint tools became more specialized, serving mainly as components of composite implements, while bone technology flourished with the production of harpoons, spear points, needles, and fishing gear. The diversity of tools reflects growing craft specialization, organized hunting, and increasingly complex social organization. In 1914, two Magdalenian skeletons - a 40-year-old man and a 20-year-old woman - were discovered at Oberkassel near Bonn, Germany. Buried about one meter apart, both had been covered in red ochre and capped with basalt slabs. Animal bones and carved bone artifacts accompanied the burials, including a polished bone spatula with a carved predator-head handle and carved horse-head ornaments. Although direct descendants of the Cro-Magnons, both individuals were short but strongly built. The man was particularly robust, with a powerful chest and broad shoulders. His height was only slightly over 1.60 m, while the woman was even shorter, standing at approximately 1.55 m. (Gerasimov 1955) The anthropologist Mikhail Gerasimov described the Oberkassel man as follows: The Oberkassel man had a very large, massive, elongated skull, with a cranial length of 198 mm, a breadth of 142 mm, and an exceptionally broad cheekbone width of 155 mm. His face was large, broad, and pentagonal, with massive cheekbones, a narrow forehead, a strong lower jaw, a broad projecting chin, and a narrow, high, protruding nose. His orbits were rectangular with prominent brow ridges. It is evident that he was exceptionally strong and undoubtedly handsome in a rugged, masculine way. As a typical Europoid, he almost certainly had a thick beard and mustache, along with straight or slightly wavy hair. The Oberkassel woman is described by Mikhail Gerasimov as follows: Her skull was large and massive, with well-developed relief. It measured 184 mm in length, 132 mm in width, and 131 mm in cheekbone breadth. The brow ridges were well developed, while the nasal bones were large and broad, with only weakly expressed nasal prominences. The occipital bone was broad and almost without curvature. The face was pentagonal, broad, and relatively high, with a massive lower jaw, a broad strongly projecting nose, a slightly prognathic alveolar region, and a projecting chin. The orbits were rectangular with prominent upper margins. Gerasimov noted that the Oberkassel woman lacked typical Cro-Magnon features. Compared with the man, her skull was lighter and less massive. His reconstruction showed some similarities to the Cro-Magnon woman, such as a sloping forehead and deep-set eyes, but differed in having a broader, shorter nose, less facial projection, and a weaker chin. While the Oberkassel man showed more exaggerated facial proportions, the woman retained more ancestral traits. Observations of Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic skulls in Europe show that some exhibit facial flattening as pronounced as that of the most strongly expressed modern Mongolid populations, affecting both the orbital and subnasal regions. The Oberkassel male and female are notable examples: their nasomalar angles measure 143° and 146°, and their zygomaxillary angles 137° and 133°, respectively. Both the absolute values and the relationship between these angles indicate a "harmonious" or "complete" degree of facial flattening comparable to that seen in the most pronounced modern Mongolid populations (V. P. Yakimov, 1956, 1960; I. I. Gokhman, 1958). The Oberkassel individuals were short but robust and, according to Gerasimov, were neither primitive nor unattractive. Their short stature, like that of other late Cro-Magnons, was attributed to the harsh conditions of the Magdalenian period. The Oberkassel Man carried Y-DNA haplogroup I2-V4921 and mtDNA haplogroup U5b1. The Oberkassel Woman shared the same mtDNA haplogroup (Posth et al 2023).
0:30

Facial reconstructions of 14,000-year-old Oberkassel WHGs The Magdalenian culture, which followed the Solutrean, dates to the end of the Ice Age. Initially, the climate was cold and humid, resembling modern tundra, with mammoths, reindeer, musk oxen, hares, and ptarmigans. During the Middle Magdalenian, conditions became colder and drier as steppe expanded northward. Mammoths disappeared, reindeer retreated north, and horses, saiga antelopes, jerboas, and Asiatic wild asses became the dominant fauna. People increasingly occupied caves, while polychrome cave art reached its peak at sites such as Altamira and Font-de-Gaume. Flint tools became more specialized, serving mainly as components of composite implements, while bone technology flourished with the production of harpoons, spear points, needles, and fishing gear. The diversity of tools reflects growing craft specialization, organized hunting, and increasingly complex social organization. In 1914, two Magdalenian skeletons - a 40-year-old man and a 20-year-old woman - were discovered at Oberkassel near Bonn, Germany. Buried about one meter apart, both had been covered in red ochre and capped with basalt slabs. Animal bones and carved bone artifacts accompanied the burials, including a polished bone spatula with a carved predator-head handle and carved horse-head ornaments. Although direct descendants of the Cro-Magnons, both individuals were short but strongly built. The man was particularly robust, with a powerful chest and broad shoulders. His height was only slightly over 1.60 m, while the woman was even shorter, standing at approximately 1.55 m. (Gerasimov 1955) The anthropologist Mikhail Gerasimov described the Oberkassel man as follows: The Oberkassel man had a very large, massive, elongated skull, with a cranial length of 198 mm, a breadth of 142 mm, and an exceptionally broad cheekbone width of 155 mm. His face was large, broad, and pentagonal, with massive cheekbones, a narrow forehead, a strong lower jaw, a broad projecting chin, and a narrow, high, protruding nose. His orbits were rectangular with prominent brow ridges. It is evident that he was exceptionally strong and undoubtedly handsome in a rugged, masculine way. As a typical Europoid, he almost certainly had a thick beard and mustache, along with straight or slightly wavy hair. The Oberkassel woman is described by Mikhail Gerasimov as follows: Her skull was large and massive, with well-developed relief. It measured 184 mm in length, 132 mm in width, and 131 mm in cheekbone breadth. The brow ridges were well developed, while the nasal bones were large and broad, with only weakly expressed nasal prominences. The occipital bone was broad and almost without curvature. The face was pentagonal, broad, and relatively high, with a massive lower jaw, a broad strongly projecting nose, a slightly prognathic alveolar region, and a projecting chin. The orbits were rectangular with prominent upper margins. Gerasimov noted that the Oberkassel woman lacked typical Cro-Magnon features. Compared with the man, her skull was lighter and less massive. His reconstruction showed some similarities to the Cro-Magnon woman, such as a sloping forehead and deep-set eyes, but differed in having a broader, shorter nose, less facial projection, and a weaker chin. While the Oberkassel man showed more exaggerated facial proportions, the woman retained more ancestral traits. Observations of Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic skulls in Europe show that some exhibit facial flattening as pronounced as that of the most strongly expressed modern Mongolid populations, affecting both the orbital and subnasal regions. The Oberkassel male and female are notable examples: their nasomalar angles measure 143° and 146°, and their zygomaxillary angles 137° and 133°, respectively. Both the absolute values and the relationship between these angles indicate a "harmonious" or "complete" degree of facial flattening comparable to that seen in the most pronounced modern Mongolid populations (V. P. Yakimov, 1956, 1960; I. I. Gokhman, 1958). The Oberkassel individuals were short but robust and, according to Gerasimov, were neither primitive nor unattractive. Their short stature, like that of other late Cro-Magnons, was attributed to the harsh conditions of the Magdalenian period. The Oberkassel Man carried Y-DNA haplogroup I2-V4921 and mtDNA haplogroup U5b1. The Oberkassel Woman shared the same mtDNA haplogroup (Posth et al 2023).

Ancestral Whispers

32,407 次观看 • 23 天前

What used to take a full crew and thousands of dollars… Seedance 2.5 generates in minutes. Consistent characters up to 30 reference images, and 20 other inputs including videos and audio. One prompt to 30-second intense 1980-movie style! Made only on CapCut 🔥 Prompt: 1980s film, authentic live-action footage shot on 35mm with heavy grain, vibrant yet gritty saturated colors, practical neon lighting mixed with harsh strobes and fog. Fast chaotic editing packed with abrupt cuts, glass reflections, POV inserts, strobe flashes and dynamic movement to create total disorientation and panic. Real practical squib blood, rubber tentacles and physical stunts. Period-accurate 80s performances: big hair, colorful outfits, leg warmers, exaggerated fear and desperate physicality. Visualized synth atmosphere through pulsing lights and sudden dead silence. [IMAGE REFERENCES] Generate from scratch a consistent group of five mid-80s young adults with distinctly different looks—tall blonde mullet guy in neon shirt, short chubby dark-curly guy in Hawaiian print, slim big-curled redhead girl in neon dress, athletic black-ponytailed girl in crop top, lanky glasses brunette in pastel polo—in colorful yacht-party fashion and one original giant octopus killer with thick rubber tentacles and gaping beak. All on a neon-drenched luxury yacht in pure practical 1980s slasher style. [TIMELINE SECOND BY SECOND] 0-3s: [Rapid Disorientation Montage] Quick jarring cuts on the dimly lit yacht deck at night. Neon lights pulsing, five friends laughing and dancing with drinks, music blasting. Inserts: champagne spilling, one girl’s smile fading as mist rises from the water, glass reflection briefly showing a massive tentacle that vanishes. Strobe flicker. Laughter dies as engines are dead and no land in sight. 3-6s: [Rising Panic Montage] Fast cuts as panic spreads. Tall blonde runs to the helm, radio smashed. Close-up of broken mic. Two girls huddle near railing, eyes wide, calling names that echo. Low-angle POV gliding through thick fog. Drink glass tips. They split—one to cabins, one to stern. Water reflections show tentacles moving unseen. 6-9s: [First Attack Sequence] Sudden violence, rapid-fire cuts. Giant octopus erupts from foggy water. Quick cuts: massive tentacle lit by strobe, slamming down, bright squib blood spray across pink jacket. Body drops hard on wet deck. Others scream and scatter, slipping. One girl falls. Octopus advances with heavy tentacle movements while neon keeps pulsing. 9-12s: [Full Chaos & Practical Kills] Frenzied montage. Multiple cuts: guy racing for life raft, tentacle appears behind him. Girl hides behind bar, tentacle smashes through, practical blood on counter. Another cornered against cabin wall, lifted and slammed, body slides leaving red streak. Feet scraping, bodies falling, fog swirling around practical gore. Violent strobes. Survivor swings boat hook, dull thud on tentacle. 12-15s: [Climax & Lingering Threat] Fast cuts. Last two desperately lower a life raft. One yanked into fog and water, scream cut short. Final girl turns, face sweat-and-blood covered, backing on slippery deck. Wide shot of yacht littered with bodies under pulsing neon. Octopus rises again, tentacle cracked but massive. She runs into darkness as strobe freezes on the gaping beak. Slight film burn at end. [STYLE & QUALITY BOOSTERS] Photorealistic 1980s film emulation, heavy natural grain and reel artifacts, authentic practical squib blood and rubber-tentacle stunts, coherent physics with realistic slips and momentum on wet wooden deck.
0:30

What used to take a full crew and thousands of dollars… Seedance 2.5 generates in minutes. Consistent characters up to 30 reference images, and 20 other inputs including videos and audio. One prompt to 30-second intense 1980-movie style! Made only on CapCut 🔥 Prompt: 1980s film, authentic live-action footage shot on 35mm with heavy grain, vibrant yet gritty saturated colors, practical neon lighting mixed with harsh strobes and fog. Fast chaotic editing packed with abrupt cuts, glass reflections, POV inserts, strobe flashes and dynamic movement to create total disorientation and panic. Real practical squib blood, rubber tentacles and physical stunts. Period-accurate 80s performances: big hair, colorful outfits, leg warmers, exaggerated fear and desperate physicality. Visualized synth atmosphere through pulsing lights and sudden dead silence. [IMAGE REFERENCES] Generate from scratch a consistent group of five mid-80s young adults with distinctly different looks—tall blonde mullet guy in neon shirt, short chubby dark-curly guy in Hawaiian print, slim big-curled redhead girl in neon dress, athletic black-ponytailed girl in crop top, lanky glasses brunette in pastel polo—in colorful yacht-party fashion and one original giant octopus killer with thick rubber tentacles and gaping beak. All on a neon-drenched luxury yacht in pure practical 1980s slasher style. [TIMELINE SECOND BY SECOND] 0-3s: [Rapid Disorientation Montage] Quick jarring cuts on the dimly lit yacht deck at night. Neon lights pulsing, five friends laughing and dancing with drinks, music blasting. Inserts: champagne spilling, one girl’s smile fading as mist rises from the water, glass reflection briefly showing a massive tentacle that vanishes. Strobe flicker. Laughter dies as engines are dead and no land in sight. 3-6s: [Rising Panic Montage] Fast cuts as panic spreads. Tall blonde runs to the helm, radio smashed. Close-up of broken mic. Two girls huddle near railing, eyes wide, calling names that echo. Low-angle POV gliding through thick fog. Drink glass tips. They split—one to cabins, one to stern. Water reflections show tentacles moving unseen. 6-9s: [First Attack Sequence] Sudden violence, rapid-fire cuts. Giant octopus erupts from foggy water. Quick cuts: massive tentacle lit by strobe, slamming down, bright squib blood spray across pink jacket. Body drops hard on wet deck. Others scream and scatter, slipping. One girl falls. Octopus advances with heavy tentacle movements while neon keeps pulsing. 9-12s: [Full Chaos & Practical Kills] Frenzied montage. Multiple cuts: guy racing for life raft, tentacle appears behind him. Girl hides behind bar, tentacle smashes through, practical blood on counter. Another cornered against cabin wall, lifted and slammed, body slides leaving red streak. Feet scraping, bodies falling, fog swirling around practical gore. Violent strobes. Survivor swings boat hook, dull thud on tentacle. 12-15s: [Climax & Lingering Threat] Fast cuts. Last two desperately lower a life raft. One yanked into fog and water, scream cut short. Final girl turns, face sweat-and-blood covered, backing on slippery deck. Wide shot of yacht littered with bodies under pulsing neon. Octopus rises again, tentacle cracked but massive. She runs into darkness as strobe freezes on the gaping beak. Slight film burn at end. [STYLE & QUALITY BOOSTERS] Photorealistic 1980s film emulation, heavy natural grain and reel artifacts, authentic practical squib blood and rubber-tentacle stunts, coherent physics with realistic slips and momentum on wet wooden deck.

MrDejie

146,071 次观看 • 13 天前

#YUMENGLONG TRAGEDY UPDATED🙏‼️ ‼️HOT NEWS‼️ 💁‍♀️ 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 1: 🧾 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗖 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 (𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗢𝗣𝗦𝗬)‼️ Host: Li Muyang👨‍💻 𝗜. 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - Commissioned by: Tuanjie Police Station, Chaoyang District, Beijing Type of examination:Determination of cause of death - Date received: September 13, 2025 - Date of autopsy: September 14, 2025 - Location: Autopsy Room No.1 - Beijing Shengtang Forensic Identification IÍntitute - Present during autopsy: Ge Yaohua, Cao Yan - Subject: Male, surname Yu, 37 years old - Condition of remains: Body preserved under refrigeration 𝗜𝗜. 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘆 The Tuanjie Police Station of Chaoyang District, Beijing, commissioned the Beijing Shengtang Forensic Identification Institute to conduct an autopsy and determine the cause of death of a 37-year-old male surnamed Yu. 𝗜𝗜𝗜. 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗽𝘀𝘆 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 1. External Examination - Height: 181 cm - Body build: Normal development, average nutrition, pale yellow skin. - Superficial lymph nodes: No palpable enlargement. - Postmortem lividity: Dark red, concentrated in the occipital, parietal, back, lumbar-sacral regions and lower extremities. - Areas not under pressure: Color unchanged upon compression. - Abdomen: Early greenish discoloration indicating initial decomposition. 2. Head and Face - Hair black, thick, approximately 12 cm long. - Scalp shows contusions and lacerations (details obscured). - Eyelids and conjunctiva pale; corneas cloudy, pupils non-reactive to light. - Traces of blood in both ears, external auditory canals, and nose. - Irregular wound approximately 3 cm long, corresponding irregular horizontal wound of about 7.5 cm on the outer surface. 3. Neck - Bruising on the right side of the neck; subcutaneous tissue and neck muscles show hemorrhage. - Soft tissue and muscles in the neck area exhibit marked subcutaneous bleeding. - Hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage show compression , suggestive of manual strangulation or ligature strangulation. 4. Oral Cavity - All teeth missing except for the lower right first premolar. - Oral mucosa and gums show necrotic changes. 5. Trunk and Limbs - Sutured wound on the left flank and upper left abdomen. - Right diaphragm appears distended. - Old scars on the backs of both hands. - No fractures detected in limbs, joints relatively intact. 6. Genital and Anal Area - External genitalia normal. - Anus shows a fresh circular wound about 5 cm in diameter. - Internal and external sphincter muscles severely torn. - Evidence of hemorrhage around the area. 𝗜𝗩. 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 1. Head - Scalp hematoma present. Galea aponeurotica shows hemorrhage. Anterior and posterior fontanelle gaps abnormally widened (not typical in adults). - Subdural space shows hemorrhage. Indicates closed cranial trauma. 2. Thoracic and Abdominal Cavities Subcutaneous hemorrhage in the chest wall. Rib fractures: - Left: ribs 3-5 - Right: ribs 3-6 Intercostal muscles show hemorrhage at fracture sites. Sternum shows corresponding injury, likely from strong frontal impact. Diaphragm shows signs of damage; possible emergency thoracotomy. Pleural fluid: - Left: approx. 150 ml - Right: approx. 200 ml Pericardial cavity: approx. 160 ml of bloody fluid. Abdominal cavity: Abdominal wall fat thickness: 0.5 cm - Upper abdomen with a hemorrhagic region measuring about 16.5 × 7 cm - Small intestine crushed, mucosa congested and reddened - About 860 ml of clear yellow fluid in the abdominal cavity. 3. Heart: Weight: 340 g - Laceration (~1.6 cm) in the superior vena cava. - Damage (~2.5 cm) to endocardium near the mitral valve and atrial appendage. => Indicates cardiac perforation - direct trauma to the heart. ❤️‍🔥 #于朦朧墜樓事件 #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #于朦胧坠楼 #YuMenglong #于朦胧 #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglong于朦胧 #于朦胧
7:54

#YUMENGLONG TRAGEDY UPDATED🙏‼️ ‼️HOT NEWS‼️ 💁‍♀️ 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 1: 🧾 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗖 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 (𝗔𝗨𝗧𝗢𝗣𝗦𝗬)‼️ Host: Li Muyang👨‍💻 𝗜. 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - Commissioned by: Tuanjie Police Station, Chaoyang District, Beijing Type of examination:Determination of cause of death - Date received: September 13, 2025 - Date of autopsy: September 14, 2025 - Location: Autopsy Room No.1 - Beijing Shengtang Forensic Identification IÍntitute - Present during autopsy: Ge Yaohua, Cao Yan - Subject: Male, surname Yu, 37 years old - Condition of remains: Body preserved under refrigeration 𝗜𝗜. 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝘂𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗿𝘆 The Tuanjie Police Station of Chaoyang District, Beijing, commissioned the Beijing Shengtang Forensic Identification Institute to conduct an autopsy and determine the cause of death of a 37-year-old male surnamed Yu. 𝗜𝗜𝗜. 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗽𝘀𝘆 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 1. External Examination - Height: 181 cm - Body build: Normal development, average nutrition, pale yellow skin. - Superficial lymph nodes: No palpable enlargement. - Postmortem lividity: Dark red, concentrated in the occipital, parietal, back, lumbar-sacral regions and lower extremities. - Areas not under pressure: Color unchanged upon compression. - Abdomen: Early greenish discoloration indicating initial decomposition. 2. Head and Face - Hair black, thick, approximately 12 cm long. - Scalp shows contusions and lacerations (details obscured). - Eyelids and conjunctiva pale; corneas cloudy, pupils non-reactive to light. - Traces of blood in both ears, external auditory canals, and nose. - Irregular wound approximately 3 cm long, corresponding irregular horizontal wound of about 7.5 cm on the outer surface. 3. Neck - Bruising on the right side of the neck; subcutaneous tissue and neck muscles show hemorrhage. - Soft tissue and muscles in the neck area exhibit marked subcutaneous bleeding. - Hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage show compression , suggestive of manual strangulation or ligature strangulation. 4. Oral Cavity - All teeth missing except for the lower right first premolar. - Oral mucosa and gums show necrotic changes. 5. Trunk and Limbs - Sutured wound on the left flank and upper left abdomen. - Right diaphragm appears distended. - Old scars on the backs of both hands. - No fractures detected in limbs, joints relatively intact. 6. Genital and Anal Area - External genitalia normal. - Anus shows a fresh circular wound about 5 cm in diameter. - Internal and external sphincter muscles severely torn. - Evidence of hemorrhage around the area. 𝗜𝗩. 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗘𝘅𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 1. Head - Scalp hematoma present. Galea aponeurotica shows hemorrhage. Anterior and posterior fontanelle gaps abnormally widened (not typical in adults). - Subdural space shows hemorrhage. Indicates closed cranial trauma. 2. Thoracic and Abdominal Cavities Subcutaneous hemorrhage in the chest wall. Rib fractures: - Left: ribs 3-5 - Right: ribs 3-6 Intercostal muscles show hemorrhage at fracture sites. Sternum shows corresponding injury, likely from strong frontal impact. Diaphragm shows signs of damage; possible emergency thoracotomy. Pleural fluid: - Left: approx. 150 ml - Right: approx. 200 ml Pericardial cavity: approx. 160 ml of bloody fluid. Abdominal cavity: Abdominal wall fat thickness: 0.5 cm - Upper abdomen with a hemorrhagic region measuring about 16.5 × 7 cm - Small intestine crushed, mucosa congested and reddened - About 860 ml of clear yellow fluid in the abdominal cavity. 3. Heart: Weight: 340 g - Laceration (~1.6 cm) in the superior vena cava. - Damage (~2.5 cm) to endocardium near the mitral valve and atrial appendage. => Indicates cardiac perforation - direct trauma to the heart. ❤️‍🔥 #于朦朧墜樓事件 #YuMenglongFallingEvent #justiceforyumenglong #于朦胧坠楼 #YuMenglong #于朦胧 #AlanYu #YuMenglong #JusticeforYuMenglong #YuMenglong于朦胧 #于朦胧

미나문🌙 🇰🇷🇹🇼

77,890 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: We FOUND the Romanian Orphan Girl Erika Kirk (Frantzve) Posted in 2013… Then Suspiciously DELETED 👀 Back in May 2013, influencer Erika Frantzve (now Kirk) posted this heartbreaking photo on Instagram: A little Romanian girl, maybe 6-8 years old, standing in what looks like an orphanage room. Green shirt, pink pants, a stuffed pink parrot on her shoulder, cardboard box in front of her. Caption: “I have something special for you… very special…” The post blew up… and then it vanished. Deleted without explanation. No archive, no follow-up, nothing. For the last 7 months, people have been wondering: Who was that girl? What really happened to her? Well… we found her. After digging through old screenshots, reverse image search, and public social media, we matched her to this girl — now a young woman who just graduated high school in 2024. Here’s why this is a STRONG, almost undeniable match (not just “kinda looks similar” — this is forensic-level facial consistency): Facial Feature Breakdown (permanent bone structure doesn’t lie): Eyes: Large, dark brown, wide-set, rounded shape with the exact same upper lid hooding and prominent eyelids. Identical in the 2013 photo, her childhood pics (purple tank top, pink skirt, headband), and even her recent selfies. Nose: Small, straight bridge with that soft, rounded tip. Matches perfectly across every photo from 2013 to 2024. Mouth & Smile: Small-to-medium lips, slight overbite, same upper teeth show when smiling. You can see the exact same smile in the orphanage pic, the swing set photos, the kitchen tutu shot, and her high-school grad selfies. Face Shape & Hairline: Soft rounded child face in 2013 that lengthened exactly as expected into the oval/heart-shaped teen face by 2024. Blunt straight-across bangs + straight dark brown hair in almost ALL her childhood photos — the signature look from the original post. Overall Proportions: Same slim build, leg-to-torso ratio, cheek-to-jaw transition through puberty. Timeline & Romanian Proof: The original photo is from Erika’s “Romanian Angels” charity project around 2012-2013 in Romania (specifically tied to orphanages in the Constanța area). This girl was living in Romania at that exact time. Multiple childhood photos show her in traditional Romanian folk costumes (one even tagged with the 🇷🇴 flag emoji and “Outfit Inspo”). Overlay text in her old videos: “There’s still a young girl from Romania.” Age lines up perfectly: ~6-8 in 2013 → high school graduation in 2024 (born ~2005-2007). This isn’t some random lookalike. These are the same eyes, same nose, same smile, same bangs, same Romanian orphan story. So here’s the part that should have everyone asking questions: Why did Erika Kirk delete that specific post? Why has she never followed up on “her” special little Romanian Angel? Why the sudden silence around the entire Romanian Angels project? Online chatter has been swirling for years, allegations of trafficking with the charity, claims of missing children from the Constanța orphanage, whispers that she was eventually banned from Romania, questions about where all these “angels” actually ended up. Was this little girl part of some bigger story? Was the post deleted because someone realized the trail could lead back to her? Or was there something about this specific child that made Erika scrub her from the internet? We’re not accusing anyone of anythin. But when a public figure posts a vulnerable orphan child with a dramatic caption, gets massive attention, then quietly erases the evidence while the internet is still talking about “Romanian Angels” conspiracies… it raises red flags. This girl is safe, grown, and thriving now (looks like she’s now in the US). But the questions remain: What was Erika Kirk really doing in Romania? Why delete the proof? What is she trying to hide? Drop this in the comments, tag everyone you know, and share this far and wide. The internet has a long memory — and we just connected the dots. If you have more info, screenshots, or leads — comment below, DM me or email and let’s get answers. CC: Candace Owens
3:23

🚨 BREAKING: We FOUND the Romanian Orphan Girl Erika Kirk (Frantzve) Posted in 2013… Then Suspiciously DELETED 👀 Back in May 2013, influencer Erika Frantzve (now Kirk) posted this heartbreaking photo on Instagram: A little Romanian girl, maybe 6-8 years old, standing in what looks like an orphanage room. Green shirt, pink pants, a stuffed pink parrot on her shoulder, cardboard box in front of her. Caption: “I have something special for you… very special…” The post blew up… and then it vanished. Deleted without explanation. No archive, no follow-up, nothing. For the last 7 months, people have been wondering: Who was that girl? What really happened to her? Well… we found her. After digging through old screenshots, reverse image search, and public social media, we matched her to this girl — now a young woman who just graduated high school in 2024. Here’s why this is a STRONG, almost undeniable match (not just “kinda looks similar” — this is forensic-level facial consistency): Facial Feature Breakdown (permanent bone structure doesn’t lie): Eyes: Large, dark brown, wide-set, rounded shape with the exact same upper lid hooding and prominent eyelids. Identical in the 2013 photo, her childhood pics (purple tank top, pink skirt, headband), and even her recent selfies. Nose: Small, straight bridge with that soft, rounded tip. Matches perfectly across every photo from 2013 to 2024. Mouth & Smile: Small-to-medium lips, slight overbite, same upper teeth show when smiling. You can see the exact same smile in the orphanage pic, the swing set photos, the kitchen tutu shot, and her high-school grad selfies. Face Shape & Hairline: Soft rounded child face in 2013 that lengthened exactly as expected into the oval/heart-shaped teen face by 2024. Blunt straight-across bangs + straight dark brown hair in almost ALL her childhood photos — the signature look from the original post. Overall Proportions: Same slim build, leg-to-torso ratio, cheek-to-jaw transition through puberty. Timeline & Romanian Proof: The original photo is from Erika’s “Romanian Angels” charity project around 2012-2013 in Romania (specifically tied to orphanages in the Constanța area). This girl was living in Romania at that exact time. Multiple childhood photos show her in traditional Romanian folk costumes (one even tagged with the 🇷🇴 flag emoji and “Outfit Inspo”). Overlay text in her old videos: “There’s still a young girl from Romania.” Age lines up perfectly: ~6-8 in 2013 → high school graduation in 2024 (born ~2005-2007). This isn’t some random lookalike. These are the same eyes, same nose, same smile, same bangs, same Romanian orphan story. So here’s the part that should have everyone asking questions: Why did Erika Kirk delete that specific post? Why has she never followed up on “her” special little Romanian Angel? Why the sudden silence around the entire Romanian Angels project? Online chatter has been swirling for years, allegations of trafficking with the charity, claims of missing children from the Constanța orphanage, whispers that she was eventually banned from Romania, questions about where all these “angels” actually ended up. Was this little girl part of some bigger story? Was the post deleted because someone realized the trail could lead back to her? Or was there something about this specific child that made Erika scrub her from the internet? We’re not accusing anyone of anythin. But when a public figure posts a vulnerable orphan child with a dramatic caption, gets massive attention, then quietly erases the evidence while the internet is still talking about “Romanian Angels” conspiracies… it raises red flags. This girl is safe, grown, and thriving now (looks like she’s now in the US). But the questions remain: What was Erika Kirk really doing in Romania? Why delete the proof? What is she trying to hide? Drop this in the comments, tag everyone you know, and share this far and wide. The internet has a long memory — and we just connected the dots. If you have more info, screenshots, or leads — comment below, DM me or email and let’s get answers. CC: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

364,202 次观看 • 3 个月前

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 次观看 • 1 年前