Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

$76,001. That was Sam Altman's salary while running OpenAI. "No. I'm paid enough for health insurance. I have no equity in OpenAI." The senator's reply: "You need a lawyer." His salary that year was $76,001. Later, in federal court, Altman acknowledged he did have economic exposure to OpenAI after... show more

Ridark

11,002 subscribers

81,466 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

My coworker started at this company in 1995. His salary was $42,000. A gallon of gas was $1.15. His rent was $650. He bought a house two years later. I started at this company in 2019. My salary was $48,000. A gallon of gas was $2.80. My rent was $1,800. I still don’t own a home. He made $6,000 more than me back then. I make $6,000 more than he did. Same company. Same role. Same hard work. He retired last year with a paid off house and a pension. I have $4,000 in savings and $38,000 in student loans. We didn’t just change the economy. We changed what a lifetime of work is worth.

My coworker started at this company in 1995. His salary was $42,000. A gallon of gas was $1.15. His rent was $650. He bought a house two years later. I started at this company in 2019. My salary was $48,000. A gallon of gas was $2.80. My rent was $1,800. I still don’t own a home. He made $6,000 more than me back then. I make $6,000 more than he did. Same company. Same role. Same hard work. He retired last year with a paid off house and a pension. I have $4,000 in savings and $38,000 in student loans. We didn’t just change the economy. We changed what a lifetime of work is worth.

Fermsy 🎒

121,366 views • 3 months ago

[1013] Actor #KimSoohyun was mentioned by actor Park Seojoon on his recent interview with Jung Jaehyung. In the video, Park Seojoon shared that after being discharged, he explained that thanks to Kim Soohyun, a friend of a friend, he was introduced to an agency. “Through a friend of a friend, at that time, my friend was close with Kim Soohyun, so they asked if he could introduce me to the company. Kim Soohyun was happy to help and made the connection for me. That’s how, through a friend of a friend, it all happened.” ⸻

[1013] Actor #KimSoohyun was mentioned by actor Park Seojoon on his recent interview with Jung Jaehyung. In the video, Park Seojoon shared that after being discharged, he explained that thanks to Kim Soohyun, a friend of a friend, he was introduced to an agency. “Through a friend of a friend, at that time, my friend was close with Kim Soohyun, so they asked if he could introduce me to the company. Kim Soohyun was happy to help and made the connection for me. That’s how, through a friend of a friend, it all happened.” ⸻

soohyunupdates

161,080 views • 1 year ago

"My father is a DIG." "It doesn't matter who your father is. He isn't the one who pays our salary." A traffic police officer's response to a driver who claimed his father was a Deputy Inspector General has gone viral on social media. The exchange took place after the officer ordered the driver to move a vehicle that had been parked in a no-parking zone.

"My father is a DIG." "It doesn't matter who your father is. He isn't the one who pays our salary." A traffic police officer's response to a driver who claimed his father was a Deputy Inspector General has gone viral on social media. The exchange took place after the officer ordered the driver to move a vehicle that had been parked in a no-parking zone.

NewsWire 🇱🇰

31,101 views • 1 month ago

NEW: Recently released January 6 footage shows one of the J6 protesters flashing something as he appears to be leaving the Capitol building. Many online are suggesting that the item he is holding is a badge and that he is a Federal agent. The man in the video is Kevin James Lyons and he was sentenced to over four years in prison. Lyons admitted to taking a wallet from then-Speaker Pelosi's staffer as well as a framed photo of Pelosi with late Congressman John Lewis. Lyons was an HVAC technician and was arrested in his home state of Illinois just one week after J6. On the evening of J6, Lyons shared a photo of the picture frame he took with his friends and said: "I'm pretty confident I am now a multiple Federal felon." It is very unlikely that the item he is holding is a badge and if it is, it is probably one that doesn't belong to him. Source assist: Brick Suit

NEW: Recently released January 6 footage shows one of the J6 protesters flashing something as he appears to be leaving the Capitol building. Many online are suggesting that the item he is holding is a badge and that he is a Federal agent. The man in the video is Kevin James Lyons and he was sentenced to over four years in prison. Lyons admitted to taking a wallet from then-Speaker Pelosi's staffer as well as a framed photo of Pelosi with late Congressman John Lewis. Lyons was an HVAC technician and was arrested in his home state of Illinois just one week after J6. On the evening of J6, Lyons shared a photo of the picture frame he took with his friends and said: "I'm pretty confident I am now a multiple Federal felon." It is very unlikely that the item he is holding is a badge and if it is, it is probably one that doesn't belong to him. Source assist: Brick Suit

Collin Rugg

3,261,934 views • 2 years ago

Ronan Farrow just did to Sam Altman what he did to Harvey Weinstein... The New Yorker dropped an 18-month investigation this morning based on 100+ interviews and a stack of internal documents that were never supposed to leave OpenAI. Ilya's secret memos, Dario Amodei's private journal. Board communications, the full picture of who Sam Altman is when the cameras are off. And the pattern starts way before OpenAI. At his first startup Loopt, senior employees went to the board and asked them to fire Sam as CEO. This happened twice, over concerns about leadership and transparency. He left, joined Y Combinator, and the same thing played out. Partners complained to Paul Graham about Sam's behavior. Graham's private take to colleagues: Sam had been lying to us all the time. Nobody removed him, he kept getting promoted. Eventually he landed the CEO seat at what is now the most consequential AI company in the world. Inside OpenAI, Ilya Sutskever spent months compiling evidence: 70 pages of Slack messages, HR documents, and photos taken on personal phones because employees knew company devices were being monitored. He sent everything to the board as disappearing messages so Sam couldn't make it go away. The very first line of his memo lists Sam's core pattern, and the first word on that list is: Lying Dario Amodei saw the same thing and handled it differently. He kept a private journal for years, over 200 pages, titled "My Experience with OpenAI" with a subheading that said "Private: Do Not Share" After all those pages, his conclusion was one sentence: the problem with OpenAI is Sam himself. He eventually left and built Anthropic. 2 of the smartest people in AI independently reached the same verdict. Neither could stop what was happening. The superalignment team, the group responsible for making sure AI doesn't go off the rails, was promised 20% of OpenAI's compute. 4 people who worked on or with the team told The New Yorker the real number was 1-2%, running on the oldest cluster with the worst hardware. The team got dissolved before finishing its work. Safety was a talking point, not a priority. Sam told the board that a safety panel had approved controversial features in GPT-4. When board member Helen Toner asked for the documentation, it turned out the most sensitive features had never been approved at all. Separately, Microsoft released an early version of ChatGPT in India without completing a required safety review and Sam never mentioned it to the board. When the board finally fired him in November 2023, he texted Satya Nadella directly with his own replacement board lineup. Thrive Capital put its planned $86B investment on hold and signaled it would only close if Sam came back, giving every OpenAI employee a financial reason to support his return. The 2 board members selected to run the "independent investigation" into Sam's conduct were chosen after close conversations with Sam himself. He engineered his own reinstatement and nobody blinked. The New Yorker quotes a board member describing Sam as having two traits you almost never see in the same person: a desperate need to be liked in every interaction, and a near-complete indifference to the consequences of deceiving someone. Multiple sources used the word "sociopathic" without being prompted and without talking to each other. The article also drops a line that might be the best summary of the whole thing. They compare Sam to Steve Jobs and his famous "reality distortion field" then point out that even Jobs never told his customers that if they didn't buy his MP3 player, everyone they loved would die. Sam wrapped that exact pitch in the language of AI safety and rode it to a potential $1T IPO. That IPO is being prepared right now, while OpenAI signs government contracts spanning immigration enforcement, domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons deployed in active war zones. Meanwhile, The Information reports that his own CFO told colleagues she doesn't believe the company is ready to go public in 2026. Farrow is answering questions on Hacker News right now. The full piece is open access. Read it before Sam figures out how to make this disappear too

Ronan Farrow just did to Sam Altman what he did to Harvey Weinstein... The New Yorker dropped an 18-month investigation this morning based on 100+ interviews and a stack of internal documents that were never supposed to leave OpenAI. Ilya's secret memos, Dario Amodei's private journal. Board communications, the full picture of who Sam Altman is when the cameras are off. And the pattern starts way before OpenAI. At his first startup Loopt, senior employees went to the board and asked them to fire Sam as CEO. This happened twice, over concerns about leadership and transparency. He left, joined Y Combinator, and the same thing played out. Partners complained to Paul Graham about Sam's behavior. Graham's private take to colleagues: Sam had been lying to us all the time. Nobody removed him, he kept getting promoted. Eventually he landed the CEO seat at what is now the most consequential AI company in the world. Inside OpenAI, Ilya Sutskever spent months compiling evidence: 70 pages of Slack messages, HR documents, and photos taken on personal phones because employees knew company devices were being monitored. He sent everything to the board as disappearing messages so Sam couldn't make it go away. The very first line of his memo lists Sam's core pattern, and the first word on that list is: Lying Dario Amodei saw the same thing and handled it differently. He kept a private journal for years, over 200 pages, titled "My Experience with OpenAI" with a subheading that said "Private: Do Not Share" After all those pages, his conclusion was one sentence: the problem with OpenAI is Sam himself. He eventually left and built Anthropic. 2 of the smartest people in AI independently reached the same verdict. Neither could stop what was happening. The superalignment team, the group responsible for making sure AI doesn't go off the rails, was promised 20% of OpenAI's compute. 4 people who worked on or with the team told The New Yorker the real number was 1-2%, running on the oldest cluster with the worst hardware. The team got dissolved before finishing its work. Safety was a talking point, not a priority. Sam told the board that a safety panel had approved controversial features in GPT-4. When board member Helen Toner asked for the documentation, it turned out the most sensitive features had never been approved at all. Separately, Microsoft released an early version of ChatGPT in India without completing a required safety review and Sam never mentioned it to the board. When the board finally fired him in November 2023, he texted Satya Nadella directly with his own replacement board lineup. Thrive Capital put its planned $86B investment on hold and signaled it would only close if Sam came back, giving every OpenAI employee a financial reason to support his return. The 2 board members selected to run the "independent investigation" into Sam's conduct were chosen after close conversations with Sam himself. He engineered his own reinstatement and nobody blinked. The New Yorker quotes a board member describing Sam as having two traits you almost never see in the same person: a desperate need to be liked in every interaction, and a near-complete indifference to the consequences of deceiving someone. Multiple sources used the word "sociopathic" without being prompted and without talking to each other. The article also drops a line that might be the best summary of the whole thing. They compare Sam to Steve Jobs and his famous "reality distortion field" then point out that even Jobs never told his customers that if they didn't buy his MP3 player, everyone they loved would die. Sam wrapped that exact pitch in the language of AI safety and rode it to a potential $1T IPO. That IPO is being prepared right now, while OpenAI signs government contracts spanning immigration enforcement, domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons deployed in active war zones. Meanwhile, The Information reports that his own CFO told colleagues she doesn't believe the company is ready to go public in 2026. Farrow is answering questions on Hacker News right now. The full piece is open access. Read it before Sam figures out how to make this disappear too

BP

16,557 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: A life insurance payout may have been the motive behind the killing of 41-year-old Salom Nikanor, the Ondangwa Magistrate’s Court heard this morning. Andreas Sunday Kanyanga (25) appeared in court on charges of murder and obstructing or defeating the course of justice. He was remanded in custody as police investigations continue. The State alleges that Kanyanga, a soldier, had taken out a life insurance policy on Nikanor. Prosecutors claim that while facing financial difficulties, Kanyanga allegedly killed Nikanor after becoming impatient that he was “taking long to die”, in order to claim the insurance payout. Opposing bail, prosecutor Naledi ||Hoeses told the court that the offence is serious and violent in nature. She alleged that Nikanor was unlawfully killed and that his body was later dumped in a water pan. The State further indicated that evidence points to mutilation of the body, demonstrating a high degree of violence and cruelty. ||Hoeses argued that granting bail at this stage would jeopardise ongoing investigations, including the recovery and forensic analysis of exhibits, outstanding post-mortem reports, and the tracing and questioning of key witnesses. Kanyanga was informed of his right to legal representation and indicated that he intends to apply for a government-funded lawyer. He was also advised of his right to bring a formal bail application, which the State said it would oppose. The court ordered that Kanyanga remain in custody at the Ondangwa police cells. The matter was postponed to 18 June 2026 for further investigation. Magistrate Shantell-Antoinette Wanga Harris presided over the proceedings. Update: Tuyeimo Haidula

BREAKING: A life insurance payout may have been the motive behind the killing of 41-year-old Salom Nikanor, the Ondangwa Magistrate’s Court heard this morning. Andreas Sunday Kanyanga (25) appeared in court on charges of murder and obstructing or defeating the course of justice. He was remanded in custody as police investigations continue. The State alleges that Kanyanga, a soldier, had taken out a life insurance policy on Nikanor. Prosecutors claim that while facing financial difficulties, Kanyanga allegedly killed Nikanor after becoming impatient that he was “taking long to die”, in order to claim the insurance payout. Opposing bail, prosecutor Naledi ||Hoeses told the court that the offence is serious and violent in nature. She alleged that Nikanor was unlawfully killed and that his body was later dumped in a water pan. The State further indicated that evidence points to mutilation of the body, demonstrating a high degree of violence and cruelty. ||Hoeses argued that granting bail at this stage would jeopardise ongoing investigations, including the recovery and forensic analysis of exhibits, outstanding post-mortem reports, and the tracing and questioning of key witnesses. Kanyanga was informed of his right to legal representation and indicated that he intends to apply for a government-funded lawyer. He was also advised of his right to bring a formal bail application, which the State said it would oppose. The court ordered that Kanyanga remain in custody at the Ondangwa police cells. The matter was postponed to 18 June 2026 for further investigation. Magistrate Shantell-Antoinette Wanga Harris presided over the proceedings. Update: Tuyeimo Haidula

Namibian Sun

116,658 views • 7 months ago

🚨 UPDATE 🚨 @ElonMusk said during his OpenAI court testimony that while a few cryptocurrencies have real value, the majority are scams. Notably, he hasn’t sold any of his Bitcoin or Dogecoin holdings, suggesting his conviction still lies with the ones he believes in.

🚨 UPDATE 🚨 @ElonMusk said during his OpenAI court testimony that while a few cryptocurrencies have real value, the majority are scams. Notably, he hasn’t sold any of his Bitcoin or Dogecoin holdings, suggesting his conviction still lies with the ones he believes in.

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐃𝐎𝐆𝐄

42,055 views • 3 months ago

In 1896, seven-year-old Charlie Chaplin was sent to a London workhouse for pauper children. His father was gone. His mother would soon be committed to a mental asylum. By 14, he was alone, surviving on the streets of Kennington with nothing but a gift for making people laugh. He joined a touring comedy troupe at 19 and crossed the Atlantic with no money and no connections. In 1914, he walked onto a film set for the first time, earning $150 a week. Two years later, he was the most famous person on Earth, commanding $670,000 a year, the largest salary ever given to a film star. From a workhouse floor to the top of the world in under a decade.

In 1896, seven-year-old Charlie Chaplin was sent to a London workhouse for pauper children. His father was gone. His mother would soon be committed to a mental asylum. By 14, he was alone, surviving on the streets of Kennington with nothing but a gift for making people laugh. He joined a touring comedy troupe at 19 and crossed the Atlantic with no money and no connections. In 1914, he walked onto a film set for the first time, earning $150 a week. Two years later, he was the most famous person on Earth, commanding $670,000 a year, the largest salary ever given to a film star. From a workhouse floor to the top of the world in under a decade.

Today In History

56,612 views • 2 months ago

Jack is 20 years old with no signs of slowing down. He now has a problematic ankle that we are sparing no expense on keeping him comfortable on. Not for our use but because he does not handle life at the farm well. He is happiest with a purpose and just being around the barn. I have had him in my life since he was a yearling and owned him since he was 3. It is not a thought I want to have that he is getting up there in age.

Jack is 20 years old with no signs of slowing down. He now has a problematic ankle that we are sparing no expense on keeping him comfortable on. Not for our use but because he does not handle life at the farm well. He is happiest with a purpose and just being around the barn. I have had him in my life since he was a yearling and owned him since he was 3. It is not a thought I want to have that he is getting up there in age.

Cherie DeVaux

22,570 views • 6 months ago

Yesterday, Lue Elizondo did a Q&A on X, and when he was asked about the connection between the phenomenon, the ancient Nephilim, and giants, he said that he was well aware of the stories, as he himself served in Afghanistan and the Middle East. This means that the story about the encounter with the red-haired giant in the desert in Kandahar really circulated among the soldiers and is not a made-up story by the media. The story goes that the red-haired giant emerged from a cave and neutralized one of the soldiers with his spear before he was taken down with heavy gunfire. The giant was clothed as if he were from the Bronze Age. Funny enough, the last time a giant was mentioned in the Bible was during the battle of David and Goliath in the Bronze Age.

Yesterday, Lue Elizondo did a Q&A on X, and when he was asked about the connection between the phenomenon, the ancient Nephilim, and giants, he said that he was well aware of the stories, as he himself served in Afghanistan and the Middle East. This means that the story about the encounter with the red-haired giant in the desert in Kandahar really circulated among the soldiers and is not a made-up story by the media. The story goes that the red-haired giant emerged from a cave and neutralized one of the soldiers with his spear before he was taken down with heavy gunfire. The giant was clothed as if he were from the Bronze Age. Funny enough, the last time a giant was mentioned in the Bible was during the battle of David and Goliath in the Bronze Age.

Open Minded Approach

130,445 views • 3 months ago

(🧵1/11) For the past year and a half, I've been investigating OpenAI and Sam Altman for The New Yorker. With my coauthor Andrew Marantz, I reviewed never-before-disclosed internal memos, obtained 200+ pages of documents related to a close colleague, including extensive private notes, and interviewed more than 100 people. OpenAI was founded on the premise that A.I. could be the most dangerous invention in human history—and that its C.E.O. would need to be a person of uncommon integrity. We lay out the most detailed account yet of why Altman was ousted out by board members and executives who came to believe he lacked that integrity, and ask: were they right to allege that he couldn't be trusted? A thread on some of of our findings:

(🧵1/11) For the past year and a half, I've been investigating OpenAI and Sam Altman for The New Yorker. With my coauthor Andrew Marantz, I reviewed never-before-disclosed internal memos, obtained 200+ pages of documents related to a close colleague, including extensive private notes, and interviewed more than 100 people. OpenAI was founded on the premise that A.I. could be the most dangerous invention in human history—and that its C.E.O. would need to be a person of uncommon integrity. We lay out the most detailed account yet of why Altman was ousted out by board members and executives who came to believe he lacked that integrity, and ask: were they right to allege that he couldn't be trusted? A thread on some of of our findings:

Ronan Farrow

8,538,590 views • 4 months ago

These are clips culled from the videos we all watched. You people and the man have lied that the girl said, "Who does this man think he is?" Meanwhile, the video evidence in the first frame shows that all she said was,"Can you imagine? What is this?" Video evidence in the second frame shows that the man was holding onto the neck of her dress and pulling it towards himself; a dress with a low neckline, which means that by pulling it away from her, he exposed her breasts to full public view. Anyone with a height higher than that neckline would have a clear view of that girl's breasts. That same video evidence shows that all the girl did initially was try to get his hands off her dress, and only swung at him and pulled his own clothing when he refused to let go. Twist this issue all you like. It does not change the facts on video. You people expected the girl to cower and accept to be treated like an animal just because the man is an elder and a lecturer.

These are clips culled from the videos we all watched. You people and the man have lied that the girl said, "Who does this man think he is?" Meanwhile, the video evidence in the first frame shows that all she said was,"Can you imagine? What is this?" Video evidence in the second frame shows that the man was holding onto the neck of her dress and pulling it towards himself; a dress with a low neckline, which means that by pulling it away from her, he exposed her breasts to full public view. Anyone with a height higher than that neckline would have a clear view of that girl's breasts. That same video evidence shows that all the girl did initially was try to get his hands off her dress, and only swung at him and pulled his own clothing when he refused to let go. Twist this issue all you like. It does not change the facts on video. You people expected the girl to cower and accept to be treated like an animal just because the man is an elder and a lecturer.

KWEKU THE HUSTLER NWA PETER OBI

31,653 views • 1 year ago

hi! i just looked through the english subs on the team txt video and there are two subs in particular that i wanted to add a little more context to 1. yeonjun talking about how his most painful moment was when he couldn’t be there in person when they won their first rookie of the year award the subtitles say “my back was injured” but yeonjun actually said he “ruptured his spinal disc” the reason i think this is important is because when the notice first came out in 2019, it said “sudden back pain” and yeonjun also said it was because he had back pain and to find out all these years later that it wasn’t actually ordinary back pain but because his spinal disc ruptured is…🥹 2. the subtitle says “i think this is the most special experience i could ever have in my life” but soobin actually said “even if i live several lives, i think that this is a special experience that i can only have in this lifetime.”

hi! i just looked through the english subs on the team txt video and there are two subs in particular that i wanted to add a little more context to 1. yeonjun talking about how his most painful moment was when he couldn’t be there in person when they won their first rookie of the year award the subtitles say “my back was injured” but yeonjun actually said he “ruptured his spinal disc” the reason i think this is important is because when the notice first came out in 2019, it said “sudden back pain” and yeonjun also said it was because he had back pain and to find out all these years later that it wasn’t actually ordinary back pain but because his spinal disc ruptured is…🥹 2. the subtitle says “i think this is the most special experience i could ever have in my life” but soobin actually said “even if i live several lives, i think that this is a special experience that i can only have in this lifetime.”

💬

265,724 views • 2 years ago

Ted Danson Wanted to “Stop Being a Liar” — But Still Wears a Hairpiece Ted Danson, now 78, recently reflected on the end of Cheers in 1993 and admitted his personal life was in rough shape at the time. “People say, ‘What was it like? What did you do when she was over?’ I said, ‘I had f–ked up my life so much that I didn’t even realize Cheers was over,’” he said on his podcast. Danson added that he “barely knew myself” and was working hard to grow up. “I wanted to stop being a liar,” he said. “I wanted to be emotionally mature. I wanted to change.” (Video: AI) He’s still wearing a hairpiece decades later. That part of the performance never stopped. Still, credit where it’s due — he was open about how messy things got and how determined he was to fix himself once the show wrapped.

Ted Danson Wanted to “Stop Being a Liar” — But Still Wears a Hairpiece Ted Danson, now 78, recently reflected on the end of Cheers in 1993 and admitted his personal life was in rough shape at the time. “People say, ‘What was it like? What did you do when she was over?’ I said, ‘I had f–ked up my life so much that I didn’t even realize Cheers was over,’” he said on his podcast. Danson added that he “barely knew myself” and was working hard to grow up. “I wanted to stop being a liar,” he said. “I wanted to be emotionally mature. I wanted to change.” (Video: AI) He’s still wearing a hairpiece decades later. That part of the performance never stopped. Still, credit where it’s due — he was open about how messy things got and how determined he was to fix himself once the show wrapped.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

52,275 views • 27 days ago

Last Thursday I was having dinner with a friend at a regular shawarma spot near the subway. A guy he knew was sitting with us. Around 21, maybe 22. Hoodie, AirPods, beat-up backpack When the check came he grabbed it without a word. No discussion. Just tapped his phone and paid for all 3 of us My friend was not even surprised. Apparently this was not the first time I asked: what do you do? He said: "I copy wallets on Polymarket" I thought it was a joke. Or some trading guru with a $500 course But he explained it simpler than I expected "On Polymarket there are wallets that are consistently in profit. Not on 1 bet but on dozens in a row. I do not try to guess who wins the election or what the weather will be in Dallas. I just look at what a wallet with a 70+ win rate is doing and repeat it" He did not build models. Did not write scripts. Did not analyze news He opened Telegram and showed me a channel. Simple messages: wallet X entered position Y, price Z cents, market such and such Then he opened Polymarket and showed me his balance I am not going to name the exact number because he did not ask for that. But I will say this: it is enough for a guy in a rented apartment with 3 roommates to casually pay for dinner for 3 and not think twice I asked: "How did you figure out which wallet to follow?" He shrugged "That is the easiest part. Polymarket is blockchain. All trades are open. You go to the leaderboard, filter by win rate, look at history. If a wallet consistently enters positions at 3 to 8 cents and closes at a dollar that is not luck. That is an information edge" Then he added something that made me freeze "The funniest part is I do not even need to understand why he bets. I do not know where he gets his information. Maybe he is an insider. Maybe he has a model. Maybe he just reads news faster. I do not care. I see that he entered and I enter a minute later. The price usually has not moved yet" I came home and could not fall asleep Opened Polymarket. Went to the leaderboard. Started digging An hour later I found the wallet he was talking about → Starting balance was negative. Current balance is a 5-figure number. Win rate above 73%. Average entry 4 to 7 cents. Average win covers 10 to 15 losses I started monitoring it manually. Set alarms. Checked every 2 hours By day 3 I realized I cannot live like this I needed the same thing that guy had. A signal in Telegram that comes on its own the moment the wallet opens a position I found a bot that does exactly that → No delays. No manual monitoring. Wallet enters and you get a notification What you do with it is up to you. Copy it exactly, use it as a signal, or just observe 2 weeks have passed. I have not become that guy from the shawarma spot. Yet But I stopped guessing. And started copying Right now somewhere a smart wallet is opening a new position. The question is whether you find out about it in a second or in 24 hours when the price has already moved

Last Thursday I was having dinner with a friend at a regular shawarma spot near the subway. A guy he knew was sitting with us. Around 21, maybe 22. Hoodie, AirPods, beat-up backpack When the check came he grabbed it without a word. No discussion. Just tapped his phone and paid for all 3 of us My friend was not even surprised. Apparently this was not the first time I asked: what do you do? He said: "I copy wallets on Polymarket" I thought it was a joke. Or some trading guru with a $500 course But he explained it simpler than I expected "On Polymarket there are wallets that are consistently in profit. Not on 1 bet but on dozens in a row. I do not try to guess who wins the election or what the weather will be in Dallas. I just look at what a wallet with a 70+ win rate is doing and repeat it" He did not build models. Did not write scripts. Did not analyze news He opened Telegram and showed me a channel. Simple messages: wallet X entered position Y, price Z cents, market such and such Then he opened Polymarket and showed me his balance I am not going to name the exact number because he did not ask for that. But I will say this: it is enough for a guy in a rented apartment with 3 roommates to casually pay for dinner for 3 and not think twice I asked: "How did you figure out which wallet to follow?" He shrugged "That is the easiest part. Polymarket is blockchain. All trades are open. You go to the leaderboard, filter by win rate, look at history. If a wallet consistently enters positions at 3 to 8 cents and closes at a dollar that is not luck. That is an information edge" Then he added something that made me freeze "The funniest part is I do not even need to understand why he bets. I do not know where he gets his information. Maybe he is an insider. Maybe he has a model. Maybe he just reads news faster. I do not care. I see that he entered and I enter a minute later. The price usually has not moved yet" I came home and could not fall asleep Opened Polymarket. Went to the leaderboard. Started digging An hour later I found the wallet he was talking about → Starting balance was negative. Current balance is a 5-figure number. Win rate above 73%. Average entry 4 to 7 cents. Average win covers 10 to 15 losses I started monitoring it manually. Set alarms. Checked every 2 hours By day 3 I realized I cannot live like this I needed the same thing that guy had. A signal in Telegram that comes on its own the moment the wallet opens a position I found a bot that does exactly that → No delays. No manual monitoring. Wallet enters and you get a notification What you do with it is up to you. Copy it exactly, use it as a signal, or just observe 2 weeks have passed. I have not become that guy from the shawarma spot. Yet But I stopped guessing. And started copying Right now somewhere a smart wallet is opening a new position. The question is whether you find out about it in a second or in 24 hours when the price has already moved

Blaze

122,780 views • 5 months ago

A little boy was left in tears after telling his teacher he needed the restroom… and being told “No, you should’ve gone during break.” He couldn’t hold it, had an accident in class, and the other kids laughed while he cried. His mom says she’s going inside to confront the teacher. No child should be humiliated like that for a basic human need. Teachers have a responsibility to protect kids, not put them in situations that embarrass them in front of their classmates. And as a parent, I know exactly how fast that protective instinct kicks in. When my middle daughter, who is a Type 1 diabetic, was denied the restroom, I didn’t hesitate — I went to that school and released absolute hell. Honestly, most parents would do the same when their child’s health or dignity is on the line. Should teachers ever be allowed to deny a child the restroom when they say they need it?

A little boy was left in tears after telling his teacher he needed the restroom… and being told “No, you should’ve gone during break.” He couldn’t hold it, had an accident in class, and the other kids laughed while he cried. His mom says she’s going inside to confront the teacher. No child should be humiliated like that for a basic human need. Teachers have a responsibility to protect kids, not put them in situations that embarrass them in front of their classmates. And as a parent, I know exactly how fast that protective instinct kicks in. When my middle daughter, who is a Type 1 diabetic, was denied the restroom, I didn’t hesitate — I went to that school and released absolute hell. Honestly, most parents would do the same when their child’s health or dignity is on the line. Should teachers ever be allowed to deny a child the restroom when they say they need it?

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

1,257,427 views • 5 months ago

NEW: Utah man drives his car through the front of a Mazda dealership just hours after purchasing the car from the same dealership. The incident happened in Sandy, Utah, after the man was told he couldn’t return the car. The man told the dealership that he would drive the car through the front door of the dealership if they didn’t let him return it. They told him that it was sold "as-is." The man did exactly what he promised and drove the car through the front door. He was arrested on charges of felony criminal mischief and reckless endangerment.

NEW: Utah man drives his car through the front of a Mazda dealership just hours after purchasing the car from the same dealership. The incident happened in Sandy, Utah, after the man was told he couldn’t return the car. The man told the dealership that he would drive the car through the front door of the dealership if they didn’t let him return it. They told him that it was sold "as-is." The man did exactly what he promised and drove the car through the front door. He was arrested on charges of felony criminal mischief and reckless endangerment.

Collin Rugg

21,067,241 views • 1 year ago

Genesis 6:6 is one of the most striking verses in all of Scripture… “And the Lord was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart.”

Genesis 6:6 is one of the most striking verses in all of Scripture… “And the Lord was sorry that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart.”

Become A Saint

228,291 views • 8 months ago

🇩🇪 JUST IN: Following a left-wing terror attack that cut power to 110,000 people in Berlin, Mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) has admitted he was playing tennis hours after the blackout hit. "Yes, I was playing tennis on Saturday," Wegner said on Wednesday evening on RBB. "Looking back, I should have said what I did on Saturday on Sunday." There are now calls for him to resign from a number of opposition politicians after he originally said he was doing home office all day. In response, he said: "I cannot prevent the opposition from saying this now. I believe the crucial thing is that we have shown that we can have a crisis, that Berliners in the affected areas now have electricity and heat again.“ He defended his tennis match with a fellow CDU politician, saying it was exercise and only lasted an hour.

🇩🇪 JUST IN: Following a left-wing terror attack that cut power to 110,000 people in Berlin, Mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) has admitted he was playing tennis hours after the blackout hit. "Yes, I was playing tennis on Saturday," Wegner said on Wednesday evening on RBB. "Looking back, I should have said what I did on Saturday on Sunday." There are now calls for him to resign from a number of opposition politicians after he originally said he was doing home office all day. In response, he said: "I cannot prevent the opposition from saying this now. I believe the crucial thing is that we have shown that we can have a crisis, that Berliners in the affected areas now have electricity and heat again.“ He defended his tennis match with a fellow CDU politician, saying it was exercise and only lasted an hour.

Remix News & Views

25,375 views • 7 months ago