正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

9 Years ago, AfriForum released TAINTED HEROES. It is a perspective that challenges the narrative or the illusion many believe they live under today. It's a highly recommended and thought-provoking watch. The documentary deals with the ANC's military training received in various African countries as well as the lesser-known...

25,845 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Pliskin 的头像
Pliskin1 年前

@afriforum Here’s a link to the full documentary, agree the ANCs history had been sanitized, they are and always have been communists.

Morne Kruger 的头像
Morne Kruger1 年前

@afriforum Found the full doc here:

American Stories Network 的头像
American Stories Network1 年前

The ultimate test of body, mind, and soul. 💥 See what determined people are truly capable of on #SurvivingMann starring @DonUSFrogMann Follow for where to watch. #SEALTeam6 #Fearless #NavySEALs #SpecOps #TacticalTraining

Pete Buttons 的头像
Pete Buttons1 年前

@afriforum

Shane Locker 的头像
Shane Locker1 年前

🛡 Afriforum Rising: The Refugee Sentinels of Boereworsland 🇿🇦🔥 🏹 Boere Without Borders: How Afriforum Became a Homeland Security Unit for Afrikaner's Last Stand 🏰 Beneath the Magaliesberg’s watchful gaze in Hartbeespoart, where the aroma of boerewors sizzling on a braai weaves through stoeps like a Sunday promise, a storm brews. It’s May 15, 2025, and AfriForum, the steadfast defender of Afrikaner rights, stands tall 103 days after Donald Trump’s February 2 X post branded South Africa’s land reform “confiscation” loud enough to rattle the White House curtains (X Post, 2025). The ANC’s Hawks, unleashed on February 10, grind on in a probe that’s chewed through more rands than a vuvuzela factory running overtime, yet AfriForum remains uncharged, a thorn in the state’s side (Hawks, 2025; Central News South Africa, 2025). Just months ago, in 2025, AfriForum forced retractions from News24, Sunday World, Mail & Guardian, TimesLIVE, Newzroom Afrika, and Daily Maverick—yes, even Zapiro had to eat his ink—for peddling “white genocide” tales as flimsy as a township tarp (Daily Maverick, 2025a). They argue ANC policies—the Bela Act choking Afrikaans schools, expropriation without compensation eyeing Afrikaner farms, and B-BBEE race laws barring white graduates—paired with a judiciary bent by ANC hands, are shoving Afrikaners out the back door, refugees in their own land (AfriForum, 2025; Judges Matter, 2020). Trump’s February 7 aid freeze, slashing USAID and threatening AGOA’s $2 billion trade lifeline, only turns up the heat (White House, 2025; Al Jazeera, 2025). For 19 years, AfriForum has guarded 7% of South Africa’s people, tied to a contested 24.9% of its soil, against a system that’s either fixing history or breaking it, depending on who’s holding the braai tongs (Stats SA, 2023; Daily Maverick, 2025b). This is a tale of a sentinel unbowed, a justice system under the microscope, and a nation where 2029 voters might just wield their ballots like a sjambok to mend the cracks. This isn’t a story born yesterday. South Africa’s roots twist through 300 years of dirt and blood, from the 1913 Natives Land Act that gifted 90% of the land to whites, to apartheid’s 1950 Group Areas Act that carved the nation into racial patches (Stats SA, 2023). Today, the 2017 land audit pegs white ownership at 24.9%, a figure Black South Africans—80% of the population—eye as a debt unpaid (Daily Maverick, 2025b). The ANC, steering since 1994, wrestles 40% unemployment and corruption scandals thicker than a potjie stew, pushing the 2024 Expropriation Act that lets the state snatch land without a cent in rare cases—enough to make Afrikaner farmers see Zimbabwe’s ghost (Public Protector, 2024; Financial and Fiscal Commission, 2016). The Bela Act, AfriForum cries, strangles Afrikaans schools under Pretoria’s thumb, a cultural chokehold they say breaches ICCPR Article 27 (Al Jazeera, 2024). B-BBEE, meant to level the field, leaves 73% of white 2024 graduates jobless, while the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), stacked with ANC loyalists, picks judges amid 53% public distrust (Graduate Employment Survey, 2024; Afrobarometer, 2021; Judges Matter, 2020). The Hawks’ probe into AfriForum? A taxpayer-funded circus, says the FF+, while Trump’s freeze—cheered by AfriForum’s UN megaphone—rattles trade talks (IOL, 2025; AfriForum, 2020). Some hear a minority’s desperate plea; others, the whine of privilege refusing to fade. Across this divided veld, the pot simmers—AfriForum clutching an Afrikaner thread, voters eyeing 2026, and a nation straining for hope. Questions Stirring in the Braai Smoke: How do ANC policies and a bent judiciary stoke Afrikaner fears of being pushed out? Why does AfriForum’s stand spark both braai-side cheers and township jeers? What does this tug-of-war say about a nation still stitching its soul? Can AfriForum’s fight mend fences or just deepen the ruts? How do we salute a sentinel without tripping over history’s thorns? Why These Matter: These questions dig at justice and belonging—can we lift one voice without drowning the chorus? They’re the spark for a South Africa that braais as one, not apart. Legal Victories: Courtroom Boer Bravado AfriForum’s courtroom scorecard could make a Springbok blush. Since 2006, they’ve racked up wins like a farmer stacking mielies: the 2011 Equality Court ruling that slapped Julius Malema’s “dubul’ ibhunu” as hate speech, a 2013 apology from Jason Mfusi, and those 2025 retractions from half the newsstands for spinning “white genocide” yarns (Equality Court, 2011; Daily Maverick, 2025a). By May 15, 2025, the Hawks’ probe—103 days of huffing and puffing—hasn’t laid a charge, leaving AfriForum’s legal streak cleaner than a freshly scrubbed stoep (Hawks, 2025). These aren’t just trophies; they’re shields for Oom Piet, sleeping sounder knowing the law’s got his back. The state’s chasing its tail, burning rands like firewood, while AfriForum’s gavel swings with Boer precision. Critics mutter about privilege flexing, but when the headlines retract and the Hawks stumble, it’s hard not to see a sentinel at work. Tie this to the bigger yarn: those 2025 retractions didn’t just clear the air—they exposed a media machine twisting truth into tinder, fueling Afrikaner persecution fears. The JSC’s ANC fingerprints on the bench, distrusted by 53%, hint at a judiciary that might greenlight policies like expropriation without a blink (Afrobarometer, 2021; Judges Matter, 2020). Beyond the courtroom, what’s AfriForum guarding? Questions Stirring in the Courtroom Dust: How have AfriForum’s 2025 retractions built a wall against Afrikaner vilification? Why do these wins feel like a lifeline to some and a taunt to others? How does a slanted judiciary grease the wheels of policies AfriForum fights? Can courtroom grit spark a fairer justice system for all? How do we cheer Afrikaner victories without stoking old fires? Why These Matter: These wrestle with fairness and friction—can we protect one patch of the veld without scorching the rest? They’re the heartbeat of a democracy on trial. Cultural Erosion: The Bela Act’s Threat to Taal AfriForum’s cultural crusade is a ballad strummed on a Hartbeespoart stoep, rich with the echo of Voortrekker tales. The 2024 Bela Act, they warn, hands Pretoria the reins to snip Afrikaans from schools, a cultural pruning they claim flouts ICCPR Article 27 (Al Jazeera, 2024). Their safety nets and volksfeeste stitch Afrikaner pride together, a counterweight to B-BBEE’s equity shove that’s left 73% of white 2024 graduates twiddling thumbs (Graduate Employment Survey, 2024; South African Government, 2022). With UN status since 2020, AfriForum’s megaphone blasts this fight worldwide, a desperate tune at stage 6 polarization (AfriForum, 2020; Genocide Watch, 2023). Scoffers call it a privileged sob story, but picture a laaitie reciting Ouma’s stories over a braai—that’s the heritage AfriForum’s clinging to, even as ANC policies threaten to mute it. The Hawks’ probe only sharpens the edge, a noisy distraction from a deeper erosion. The Bela Act, backed by a judiciary AfriForum says bends ANC ways, drives those refugee flights—Afrikaners bolting as taal fades (Judges Matter, 2020). The 2025 retractions bolster their claim: if the media can’t be trusted, who’s guarding the truth? But what’s at stake if the ballad stops? Questions Stirring in the Cultural Ballad: How does the Bela Act chip away at Afrikaner roots? Why does holding onto taal feel like a war cry? How does a tilted bench worsen this cultural squeeze? Can AfriForum’s stand weave heritage into a shared future? How do we cradle Afrikaans without dropping other tongues? Why These Matter: These test our rainbow’s hues—can one color shine without dimming the rest? They’re the soul of a nation that sings together. Economic Persecution: Expropriation and Race Laws AfriForum’s economic battle is a farmer’s lament, raw as a Hartbeespoort wind. The 2024 Expropriation Act, greenlighting rare no-compensation land grabs, looms over Afrikaner farmers tied to 24.9% of the soil, a specter of Zimbabwe’s ruin (Daily Maverick, 2025b; Financial and Fiscal Commission, 2016). B-BBEE, chasing equity, slams the door on 73% of white graduates, a jobless march AfriForum calls exclusion by design (Graduate Employment Survey, 2024; South African Government, 2022). They say it’s persecution, not progress, with a judiciary—steered by an ANC-heavy JSC—rubber-stamping the squeeze (Judges Matter, 2020). For Oom Piet, it’s a plaas under threat, a livelihood yanked like a braai grid mid-cook. Critics shout redress, but when the Hawks’ probe chases AfriForum instead of solutions, it’s a circus with no ringmaster. Knot this into the tale: the 2025 retractions spotlight a media hyping economic fears, while judicial bias might let expropriation roll unchecked. AfriForum’s defiance is a lifeline against a tide pushing Afrikaners out—refugees fleeing a system that’s either healing history or hacking it apart. What happens if the lifeline snaps? Questions Stirring in the Economic Veld: How do expropriation and B-BBEE shove Afrikaners to the edge? Why do some see persecution where others see justice? How does a stacked judiciary fuel this economic bind? Can we fix history’s ledger without bankrupting Afrikaners? How do we share the potjie without spilling the broth? Why These Matter: These grapple with wealth and wounds—can redress lift all boats or just sink some? They’re the meat of a fair Mzansi. Judicial Influence: ANC’s Grip as Persecution Enabler The judiciary’s ANC lean is AfriForum’s bogeyman, a shadow over every fight. The JSC, packed with ANC picks, shapes the bench (estimated 40-70% appointment despite only having 40% votes), and 53% of South Africans smell bias—especially after the 2018 “Kill The Boer” ruling waved off hate speech charges (Afrobarometer, 2021; Equality Court, 2018; Judges Matter, 2020). AfriForum says this tilt clears the runway for Bela Act enforcement and expropriation, policies driving Afrikaners to pack bags and bolt (AfriForum, 2025). Transformation’s the ANC’s defense, but when transparency’s thinner than a township tarp, trust crumbles (Judges Matter, 2020). The Hawks’ probe—103 days of taxpayer-funded noise—only muddies the waters, while AfriForum’s UN voice begs the world to peek behind the curtain (Hawks, 2025; AfriForum, 2020). It’s less a court than a choir, some say, singing ANC tunes while Afrikaners hear a dirge. Weave this tight: judicial sway, paired with the 2025 retractions’ media mess and the Hawks’ bluster, stokes persecution fears. AfriForum’s global cry ties local woes to bigger stakes—lose the courts, lose the game. What’s left if justice wears a party tie? Questions Stirring in the Judicial Shadows: How does ANC’s JSC grip greenlight policies AfriForum calls persecution? Why does a wobbly bench drive Afrikaner fears of flight? What fixes a justice system creaking under distrust? Can a reformed judiciary steady South Africa’s wobble? How do we tune justice to sing for all, not one? Why These Matter: These probe the scales—bias tips them, threatening every fight AfriForum wages. They’re the bedrock of a democracy worth keeping. Synthesis: A Sentinel’s Unshakable Vigil Step back to the braai grid: AfriForum’s fight—courtroom wins, cultural grit, economic defiance, judicial jabs—builds a case as solid as Hartbeespoart granite. The 2025 retractions, 2011 Malema ruling, Bela Act pushback, and UN lobbying prove it’s a sentinel for Afrikaners at stage 6 polarization (Daily Maverick, 2025a; Equality Court, 2011; Al Jazeera, 2024; AfriForum, 2020; Genocide Watch, 2023). A JSC-twisted judiciary enables ANC policies—expropriation, Bela, B-BBEE—that AfriForum says spark refugee flights, a persecution puzzle with pieces too clear to miss (Judges Matter, 2020; AfriForum, 2025). Test it: strip AfriForum away, and taal fades, farms fall, safety frays—stage 7 looms (Genocide Watch, 2023). The stakes? A nation split by a 0.63 Gini gap and crumbling trust, begging 2029 voters to stoke this vigil (World Bank, 2023; Afrobarometer, 2021). It’s not just Afrikaners—it’s Mzansi’s soul on the coals. Questions Stirring in the Vigil’s Glow: How do AfriForum’s battles hold back an Afrikaner exodus? Why does its watch feel vital yet split the crowd? What crumbles if this sentinel steps off the stoep? Can AfriForum’s fire light a path for all South Africans? How do we teach the next laaitie to guard every right? Why These Matter: These are the pulse of justice—AfriForum’s stand keeps one voice alive, or division silences all. They’re the embers of hope. Objections: The Critics’ Veld Fire Critics blaze like a summer scorch. “AfriForum’s guarding privilege,” the ANC bellows, painting their fight as a white whine (ANC, 2025). But 2025 retractions and 49 farm murders in 2024 say threats aren’t imagined (Daily Maverick, 2025a; AfriForum, 2024). “Judicial sway is transformation,” they argue—yet 53% distrust and a 2018 hate speech pass suggest favoritism (Afrobarometer, 2021; Equality Court, 2018). “Persecution’s a stretch,” they scoff, but refugee flights and Bela Act fears beg to differ (AfriForum, 2025). Facts stand like a Magaliesberg ridge—AfriForum’s not clutching apartheid’s ashes; it’s shielding a living stake. Questions Stirring in the Critics’ Blaze: Are critics dodging facts or just warming old tales? How do we weigh AfriForum’s heart against its heat? Why’s dismissing persecution the easy braai chat? Can we douse the skeptics with AfriForum’s truth? When will they see a sentinel, not a ghost? Why These Matter: These bridge doubt and deed—understanding AfriForum’s fight keeps justice cooking, not burning out. Conclusion: The Ballot as Mzansi’s Sjambok South Africa teeters at stage 6—fractured, not shattered. AfriForum’s 2025 retractions earned from local legacy media, legal muscle, cultural roar, and judicial prodding show it’s a bulwark for Afrikaner rights against ANC policies and a tilted bench driving folks out (Daily Maverick, 2025a; Equality Court, 2011; AfriForum, 2025; Judges Matter, 2020). This web—law, heritage, jobs, justice—warns stage 7 lurks if the sentinel falters (Genocide Watch, 2023). Voters, your 2029 ballots are the sjambok to whip this mess straight—demand truth, fix the courts, heal scars from 1913’s land grab to today’s 24.9% white slice (Daily Maverick, 2025b). Grab it: back AfriForum’s watch, challenge ANC sway, vote for a veld where Oom Piet and township neighbors braai side by side. Will we grill a future or let the fire die? #BoerButMakeItInternational 🌍 #RefugeesInOurOwnLand 🏞 #SentinelSyndrome 🛡 #BraaivleisAndBias 🍖⚖ #ANCvsTheBoerWars 🦅🚜 #BEEEeeKILLME 🔥🎓 #JusticeForOomPiet ⚖🧓 #FromLandToLawsuit 📜🌾 #HawksWithoutClaws 🦅🫠 #ZumaAteMyFarm 😭🚜 #HeritageOrHeresy 📚🔥 #DubulIBraai 🔫🍖 #BoerGoesGlobal 🌍🧑‍🌾 #TaalIsNotToxic 🗣❤ #WhiteGenocideClaimsAndChill ☠📺 #ANCrazy 🔥🧠 #LegalWoesAndBoereRows ⚖🚧 #StoepsideStruggle 🛋✊ #BantustanButForBoere 🤯🇿🇦 #AfriForumToTheUN 🚀🗽 References (APA): AfriForum. (2020). AfriForum now registered with the UN as an NGO. AfriForum. (2024). Farm attacks. AfriForum. (2025). Statement on ANC policies and Afrikaner refugee flights. Afrobarometer. (2021). Public trust in institutions: South Africa 2021. Al Jazeera. (2024). South Africa’s new school language law. ANC. (2025). Statement on AfriForum’s misinformation campaign. Central News South Africa. (2025). Kallie Kriel says AfriForum will not be silenced. Daily Maverick. (2025a). ANC and the media’s missed information in claims against Solidarity Movement. Daily Maverick. (2025b). Land ownership in SA: The facts and figures. Equality Court. (2011). AfriForum v Malema. Equality Court. (2018). “Kill The Boer” ruling. Financial and Fiscal Commission. (2016). Land reform and agriculture. Genocide Watch. (2023). Ten stages of genocide framework. Graduate Employment Survey. (2024). Employment trends for South African graduates. Hawks. (2025). Statement on AfriForum treason investigation. IOL. (2025). FF+ slams Hawks’ treason probe against AfriForum. Judges Matter. (2020). Judicial Service Commission analysis. Public Protector. (2024). Annual report on state capture. South African Government. (2022). Employment equity report. Stats SA. (2023). Population and land ownership statistics. White House. (2025). Executive order on South Africa aid freeze. World Bank. (2023). Gini index - South Africa. X Post. (2025). Donald Trump’s February 2, 2025, post on South Africa.

Pete Buttons 的头像
Pete Buttons1 年前

@afriforum Also read Peoples War by Anthea Jeffery.

Flip Liebenberg 的头像
Flip Liebenberg1 年前

@afriforum 👍🏻

ɖɛɛʑŋųɬʑ 🇺🇸🇮🇱🏴‍☠️ 的头像
ɖɛɛʑŋųɬʑ 🇺🇸🇮🇱🏴‍☠️1 年前

@afriforum Yep.

Mels 的头像
Mels1 年前

@afriforum “People are dying in order to satisfy the ambitions of selfish politicians” @SecRubio @elonmusk @POTUS @VP @joelpollak

Smilo Mkhize 的头像
Smilo Mkhize1 年前

@afriforum All of this is said by AfriForum? The ANC never attacked UDF,AZAPO and PAC the only political party they had a problem is the same party that was on AWB’s lap(IFP). When I engaged u few days back I thought u were a normal, U just another Apartheid relic longing for it return.

𝖡𝖠𝖡𝖠 𝖸𝖠𝖦𝖠 ®✞ 的头像
𝖡𝖠𝖡𝖠 𝖸𝖠𝖦𝖠 ®✞1 年前

@afriforum There is your truth, and then there are documents of historical accounts. Excuse me while I become a scholar of all of them and don't simply just take your word for it.

相关视频

Our ‘international airport’ had an in-depth interview with the British media in 1985. It was at the height of the apartheid state brutality and repression. He led a massive international campaign for comprehensive sanctions against the apartheid regime. The year 1985 marked a pivotal escalation in South Africa’s anti-apartheid struggle, characterised by widespread mass protests, labor strikes, and intensified township resistance. By June, the UN Security Council urged member states to impose sanctions against the apartheid regime, precipitating a deepening political crisis. In response, PW Botha proclaimed a state of emergency to avert systemic collapse. The European Community and Commonwealth nations duly responded with economic sanctions. Until this moment, the US had extended unconditional political and economic backing to apartheid South Africa. It was only in 1986 under international pressure that the US imposed stricter economic measures against the apartheid regime. Winnie Mandela had been banished to Brandfort in the Free State. She defied the banning order and returned to Soweto to spearhead grassroots resistance against the regime. From 1985 onward, apartheid began to unravel. The state despite its attempts repression, it increasingly could not sustain its legitimacy and political stability. The real turning point came when FW de Klerk replaced PW Botha in 1989 and moved to open negotiations. In 1990, the ANC and other liberation organisations were unbanned, and Mandela was released from prison. Subsequent negotiations culminated in a transitional settlement wherein the enfeebled apartheid criminals ceded political power to the ANC while retaining de facto dominance over the economy. This negotiated criminal structure still persists today. Economic power remains concentrated among historical beneficiaries of the apartheid regime. Our economic liberation was sold at the negotiations table. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela did say that she felt betrayed. Chris Hani too opposed the negotiations and was murdered.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

39,424 次观看 • 3 个月前

Clip featuring Robinson Ramaite, the first President of SASCO (1991). Muthanyi Robinson Ramaite is a former student activist, political organiser, public servant and business leader whose political consciousness was forged during the height of the anti-apartheid struggle in the 1980s. Born in rural Venda to missionary-teacher parents, he became politically active while still in high school, participating in student protests against the militarisation of black education and the broader apartheid system in the former homelands. His activism intensified at the University of the North (Turfloop), one of the most politically militant campuses of the apartheid era and, at the time, a university under military occupation by the apartheid state. At Turfloop, Ramaite became deeply involved in the underground structures of the African National Congress (ANC) through the South African National Students Congress (SANSCO), participating in campaigns against financial exclusion, apartheid education, detentions, and state repression. He organised across campuses, teacher training colleges and communities throughout the Northern Transvaal, helping to build student and youth formations aligned to the Mass Democratic Movement. Ramaite rose rapidly through the ranks of student politics and became the Northern Transvaal Chairperson of SANSCO. Following the release of political prisoners and the unbanning of political organisations in 1990, he became part of the historic discussions aimed at building a unified non-racial student movement in South Africa. These engagements culminated in the merger between the predominantly black student organisation, SANSCO, and the historically white National Union of South African Students (NUSAS), leading to the formation of the South African Students Congress (SASCO) at Rhodes University in 1991. Ramaite was elected as the first President of SASCO in 1991 and served two consecutive terms until 1993. Under his leadership, SASCO became one of the most influential student formations during South Africa’s democratic transition, championing non-racialism, transformation in higher education, student access, democratic governance and the broader programme of social transformation. He belonged to a generation of activists shaped by underground political work, ideological engagement, student mobilisation and mass democratic struggle, helping sustain pressure against apartheid while repositioning the student movement for the democratic era. Following the advent of democracy, Ramaite transitioned into government service and, in 1999, at the age of 29, was appointed by Thabo Mbeki as Director-General of the Department of Public Service and Administration, becoming the youngest Director-General in South African history. In this role, he played a significant part in the post-apartheid restructuring of the South African state and helped lead the establishment of the country’s new public service administration following the first Government of National Unity. Ramaite was central to the development of the policy and governance frameworks that continue to underpin South Africa’s democratic public service. His work contributed to the institutionalisation of a unified, non-racial and professional public administration system designed to replace the fragmented apartheid bureaucracy inherited from the homeland and apartheid state structures. In 2004, he left government to pursue business interests and has since been involved in a number of commercial ventures across different sectors, including mining, investments and corporate leadership. He currently serves as Group Chief Executive Officer of Salungano Group, a JSE-listed company, and has also participated in various strategic policy and intellectual platforms focused on governance, economic transformation and development.

History ZAR

24,582 次观看 • 2 个月前

THE JEWS DID IT! The Jews in America and Israel contacted the South African Jewish Board of Deputies and the Embassy or Israel in South Africa in 2023 and after 3 years, Werksman’s Attorneys in Sandton was able to win the court favor and the South Africa Human Rights Commission to ban the movie “Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black America” in South Africa. This is a 1st in History as South Africa has become the 1st Country in the WORLD to ban this bonafide documentary movie about Black/African/Bantu History to its citizens while the vast majority of South Africans had no clue there was a 3-year battle to keep the information in this movie from the eyes and ears of the majority black population in South Africa. While the movie is still legal to watch without being convicted of a crime (jail time/fine) in America, the UK and the rest of the world…it is not the case in South Africa. The Jews banning this movie in SA is major. The South African Film and Publication Board committee told me in 2025 that this will be the 1st time in the history of the Republic of South Africa and the first time since the creation of the South African Film & Publication Board that a film…especially one that is a bonafide documentary about BLACK HISTORY is banned from the citizens of South Africa. What do you guys think? I thought we are adults and can decide for ourself what we think is acceptable to watch. Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of thought. In the Book “1984” there is a famous quote, “To die hating them, that was freedom.”. Who are the “Proles” and who is “Big Brother” & the “Thought Police” in South Africa? America? The world? People say, “File an Appeal…take it to the High Court!” But the Jews are billionaires and millionaires in South Africa. Why should i have to fight a whole Religion, race and group by myself? If truth and information ABOUT who are the True Israelites and where is the True Land of Israel (i.e. Land of Canaan) reaching millions of people in Africa, America and the world is what the Jews fear then check out my other movies on

Ronald Dalton Jr

29,676 次观看 • 5 个月前

.The Presidency 🇿🇦 Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 and his ANC-led South African Government's failure to condemn, prevent, and punish genocidal incitement (such as the chant “Kill the Boer, kill the farmer”) constitutes, in itself, a grave violation of the Genocide Convention. Before the leftist media and farm murder denialists rush to condemn me for this statement, please note that I am merely applying the South African government’s own argument, used during its case against Israel at the ICJ, back onto them. This video shows how South Africa’s legal representative in the ICJ case, Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, argued as follows: “The intentional failure of the Government of Israel to condemn, prevent, and punish such genocidal incitement constitutes in itself a grave violation of the Genocide Convention. We should recall, Madam President, that in Article 1 of the Convention, Israel confirmed that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law, and it undertook to prevent and to punish it as such. This failure to prevent, condemn, and punish such speech by the government has served to normalize genocidal rhetoric and [posed] extreme danger for Palestinians within Israeli society.” AfriForum and I hope the farm murder denialists and leftist media now recognise that the ANC-led government and President Ramaphosa are themselves contravening the Genocide Convention by failing to condemn or act against the genocidal chant “Kill the Boer.” If not, they should reject South Africa’s own evidence at the ICJ. They cannot have it both ways. By the way, Advocate Ngcukaitobi is the same lawyer who defended Julius Malema’s right to use genocidal chant ‘Kill the Boer’ in South Africa. Donald J. Trump Secretary Marco Rubio Elon Musk AfriForum

Kallie Kriel

181,031 次观看 • 1 年前

HOW CONGO INSPIRED IRISH LIBERATION In this powerful address, Richard Boyd Barrett, an Irish parliamentary representative for the People Before Profit-Solidarity coalition, highlights how the Congo inspired the Irish liberation struggle. The speech was made at an anti-racist rally in response to a growing far-right presence in Ireland that has recently orchestrated racist riots. Boyd Barrett dismantled the divisive myths of racism, exposing it as a cynical tool used by the ruling class to divide and rule the working class. Drawing on the legacy of Irish revolutionary leader Roger Casement, he noted how Ireland’s fight for freedom is inextricably linked to the global struggle against imperialism. Casement, once a diplomat for the British colonial service, saw the horrific dehumanisation of the Congolese people and realised that their fight against empire and slavery was identical to Ireland’s own resistance against British colonial subjugation and genocide. As Casement famously declared, witnessing the suffering of the people of the Congo helped him "discover his inner patriot." This message remains as urgent today as ever, especially after the death of Yves Sakila, a 35-year-old Congolese man in Dublin and the racist riots that happened in Belfast in the North of Ireland. Boyd Barrett argues that if the Irish claim to respect a tradition of resistance to empire, they must recognise that the fight against racism is the central, integral heart of the collective struggle for the liberation of all.

Sovereign Media

10,332 次观看 • 1 个月前