正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🔥 9/11 ghost plane Here is how you could have inserted a CGI plane into the footage in under five minutes with the software available back then. The same approach works for any footage from that day. Of course this is not definitive proof, but as you can see,...

1,218,865 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

A D 的头像
A D3 天前

This is ludicrous. There were literally THOUSANDS of eyewitnesses. I lived in NYC and worked in WTC4. My flatmate saw the 2nd plane hit from less than 500m away

Nic_sia 的头像
Nic_sia3 天前

I think you're referring to this video? Sorry that you're getting all the hates... I tried to debunk this video as well, but the editing is just awful, couldn't debunk it! Hope you're well fighting the good fight alongside Cirno! He's super interesting.

Oliver Janich 的头像
Oliver Janich3 天前

Yes, thank you!

Nic_sia 的头像
Nic_sia3 天前

You're welcome. May God bless you!

Thulsa Doom 的头像
Thulsa Doom3 天前

Nigga, they didn’t have this technology in 2001. There are about 20 angles from amateur video of the 2nd plane. Holy Fuck

NWO Dissident 1776. 的头像
NWO Dissident 1776.3 天前

Remember when the nose of the plane came through the other side of the building? Which is obviously impossible, but a segment in this video explains what happened.

Lynnwood Nester 的头像
Lynnwood Nester3 天前

It's kinda a dumb assertion considering 76 different cameras showed the same approach and strike on the 2nd tower. The assertion relies on every news organization and citizen alike CGI'ing their footage to match precisely from every angle.

Wuppi ꥟ #FreieRedeJetzt 的头像
Wuppi ꥟ #FreieRedeJetzt3 天前

Du Hornochse machst einen richtig wütend mit deinem bewusst gelogenen Bullshit.

Robert Wozniak 的头像
Robert Wozniak3 天前

The fact that we didn’t see any parts of the plane break off and fall to the ground, even the wing tips or the very tip of the rear stabilizer. Literally every part of that thing aluminum plane went straight through that concrete and steel. Which is impossible.

Joel Stitely 的头像
Joel Stitely3 天前

Oh so dozens of amateur videos had photshop inserted into them? Lol stop making us conspiracy people look retarded

Brent Mohrman 的头像
Brent Mohrman3 天前

Well, then you have a problem of the hundreds that died in the planes and thousands of people who saw it live in person, and the millions that watched it live on TV but you do you, Bucky.

Guido Richter 的头像
Guido Richter3 天前

Great disrespect towards victims, fire fighters, doctors, police, people helping, remaining families (did the dead people vanish by cgi as well?) and thousands of eyewitnesses. Shame on you idiot.

Keith Stoker 的头像
Keith Stoker3 天前

Thousands of people witnessed it with their own eyes. I wish you millennials would stop making up b.S.

Karl Zauner 的头像
Karl Zauner3 天前

Those, who don´t know are mostly Programmed. My Experience is, the Program can be attacked by Backdoors, like WTC7 (Which is really Copperfields masterpiece, to make it vanish from most peoples mind) more easily.

yagulito 的头像
yagulito3 天前

The towers were destroyed by someone else not what the media tells us, def there’s a conspiracy here and someone def knows the whole 9 yrs of the truth; until then we just go day by day prying it never happens again.

ein gray 的头像
ein gray3 天前

I don't no how true this is but listen to what these fireman say about the plane 🤔

Terrence Tendie 的头像
Terrence Tendie3 天前

let's run a thought experiment. Assume this video is accurate and cgi was used to add the plane in TV footage, meaning nobody on the ground actually saw a plane hit the tower, or what they saw was some other kind of drone or projectile. Does something like this have historical precedent? Meaning, have governments ever run an op on the ground in real-time, but later altered the footage of that op so it changes the perception of what really happened?

armouredgentleman 的头像
armouredgentleman3 天前

People who make the CGI plane claim failed to forget that, the plane striking the second tower was filmed by at least 69 separate people, from pretty much every angle imaginable. This also isn't including the fact that eyewitnesses literally say the plane hit the tower.

Ryan T. Clark 的头像
Ryan T. Clark3 天前

Tens of thousands of bystanders watched this live in NYC. But conspiracy theory away, it's America.

SKV11KDD 的头像
SKV11KDD3 天前

Not CGI, the planes were a projected hologram. CGI and nano thermite are both limited hangouts. Fuck you

Tawnya Samuels 的头像
Tawnya Samuels3 天前

What about the thousands of people on the street that seen planes? You can’t be this obtuse.

Botte 的头像
Botte3 天前

Junge es gibt Überlebende ausm South Tower, die direkt sahen wie das Flugzeug auf sie zuraste. Was stimmt nicht mit dir?!

El Triple Maxi 的头像
El Triple Maxi3 天前

What about the other dozen of videos all perfectly timed and independently filmed, asshole?

Dark Candle 的头像
Dark Candle3 天前

How could you insert that into the eyes of thousands on the street?

duck 的头像
duck3 天前

man, you guys really have a tough time coping with the fact that thousands of people saw a plane crash into a skyscraper. waste of fucking time, not like it matters to sub-IQ retards

FreeIran 的头像
FreeIran3 天前

LOL. 100K+ persons saw it. Was it a hologram what they saw? Who provided the CGI. Pentagon send CGI edited videos to CNN?

faith bryant 的头像
faith bryant3 天前

It also may have been a drone plane. What about the guy that got the 1st video of it

Paul Whittleton 的头像
Paul Whittleton3 天前

How can you inset a CGI plane into a reality ? I actually watched the plane fly over and hit the south tower, it wasn’t CGI, you idiots are so desperate to prove it was all a conspiracy or hoax that you really are scraping the bottom of the barrel 😅😅

Got any grapes? 🍇 的头像
Got any grapes? 🍇3 天前

You know there's over 100 videos of the 2nd plane

R. Sanso 的头像
R. Sanso3 天前

I think parts particurlaly the right side of the plane should have gone thru the far side of bldg and scattered within the city. Mass and velocity plus the bldg's depth looks like is only just alittle over 2 x the plane's lenght. It's hard to beleive it all vaporized

PoliticallyUnaffiliated 的头像
PoliticallyUnaffiliated3 天前

So they edited all 76 videos that show the plane from various angles, and somehow didn’t miss a single video? What happened to the original videos? What about the thousands of people who saw the plane with their own eyes?

Rational Voice 的头像
Rational Voice3 天前

If literally all we had was a single home camera video that wasn’t released for weeks, this would be a valid argument But there’s hundreds of videos, many recorded & broadcast live, thousands of photos, over a million eye witnesses… it’s impossible to fake that Impossible

Ryan 的头像
Ryan3 天前

I’ll say this over and over. The absolute best way to prove someone wrong on either side of the argument is to rebuild the towers and fly a plane into it going the same speed. Same size plane and all. Remote controlled of course. Same size tower same exact build cement and steel and all. Fly that plane into it and if it doesn’t fall down in the same amount of time or fall down at all you prove it wrong. Or right. If it falls I do expect to see steel columns cut at a 45 degree angle. Also there needs to be a public audience not a private event and it needs to be broadcasted world wide. No commercials, no cuts, constant play with witnesses there to verify it not social media influencers to “verify it”. At least a crowd of 10k people. They all record too. See what happens then that proves 9/11 one way or the other.

Paul Crespo 的头像
Paul Crespo3 天前

Damn you are stupid AF. thousands of people saw the planes hit LIVE in person and on live TV. STFU already, jackass.

BlackSwan 的头像
BlackSwan3 天前

most accurate depiction i have every seen ! good job

相关视频

James McAvoy admits he lied to his agent and pretended to love the X-Men script before accepting the role "X-Men came in. I went, 'Where's it filming?' They went, 'Pinewood.'" "It's 40 minutes from my front door. I was like, awesome. And I was also like, X-Men, great, I loved the cartoon when I was a kid, that'd be brilliant." "I loved the movies that came out in 2000, Bryan Singer's original movies, they were brilliant.And I was like, what part? And they were like, it's Charles. And I was like, great, I get to be fucking Jean-Luc Xavier, it's gonna be brilliant." "They said the script is under wraps, so you need to go to this restaurant and they'll give it to you, and you read it, and then you have to give them an answer quick." "So I went, it was like a chain restaurant, it wasn't even fancy, not like a McDonald's, but it was like, you know, like a Burger King." "And I go in and I meet Matthew Vaughn, and he has a quick chat with me, and then I sit and read the script." "Nobody tells me that there's only like 60 pages of it at this point, and I feel like it's good, Jane Goldman did a great job, it's good, but it's incomplete, really. Don't know where it's going." "But I was like, this is a three-picture deal, they're paying well, it's 40 minutes from my front door, I'm a fan of the original material, I get to be young Jean-Luc Xavier. I was like, this is a no-brainer." "So my agent called me, and she was like, what do you think? And I was like, it's a work of genius, we're doing it."

crest.

150,134 次观看 • 14 天前

“Because I think a lot of people are familiar with you know, pop stars have these alter egos on stage and then they're also a little bit potentially different behind the scenes. Can you talk about what the difference is between those two personas?” ROSÉ: I think, you know, like I started off as, my whole career started as Blackpink and I feel like it was so much fun creating this character on stage because I'm just from like Australia, like in my bedroom, but like it was so much fun creating this like pop star, like character. It was so much fun. And then I think creating my first solo album, it was my discover of like, you know, who am I? And like when I was naming the album, I really thought a lot about it. There was like options like, you know, number one girl. And then a lot of people did like, what about Rosie? And at first I was like, it seems a bit like narcissistic. I'm not sure. And then it slowly grew on me. And then, you know, just the idea of it being Rosie because Rosé has been such a big part of my life. And that's what we present ourselves as Blackpink, Blackpink Rosé. And I felt like this was very opposite. And so I noticed that it was closer to kind of introducing a different version of me, like because it combined all the stories I would talk about with my friends and family. And they call me Rosie at home. And of course, the online name that the company had made for me from at the beginning of Blackpink, I remember when it happened was like the day before they released my picture, profile picture, they were like, Rosé. And like the name got announced.

rosie

47,583 次观看 • 7 个月前

Bill Maher DEFENDS Charlie Kirk after actor David Cross tried to paint him as racist. Maher refused to let Cross run away with the narrative. MAHER: “But like the the the rank and file Republican, I don’t think is a racist.” “I think you can get them into positions that look racist, but I don’t think in their bones they’re like what the racists kind of what I grew up was like a racist was somebody who didn’t want to shake a black person’s hand.” CROSS: “Yes...I don’t think that’s a thing, but I think there is...I mean I know there is because they say as much.” “There’s a feeling, a sense that...uh...I mean like Charlie Kirk stuff that women and black people and black women especially are just not...” “I’m not being an a**hole guys, I’m just saying they don’t have the mental, you know...” MAHER: “There was a little more [to it].” “I read that when he died, of course lots of places put his greatest hits...worst hits, worst things.” “And then somebody else printed something and this is what always happens with the media like I never trust it because you never get the full story, where like each one was put in with the full context.” “It was never quite as bad as they said.” CROSS: “I mean, context is everything, right?” MAHER: “It is. I’m just saying it was easy to pull from his quote bed and find stuff that I certainly don’t agree with even in the context, but it wasn’t quite what...it wasn’t quite what you were saying there.”

Overton

405,217 次观看 • 4 个月前

Q: “Because I think a lot of people are familiar with, you know, pop stars have these alter egos on stage and then they're also a little bit potentially different behind the scenes. Can you talk about what the difference is between those two personas?” ROSÉ: “I think, you know, like I started off as, my whole career started as Blackpink and I feel like it was so much fun creating this character on stage because I'm just from like Australia, like in my bedroom, but like it was so much fun creating this like pop star, like character. It was so much fun. And then I think creating my first solo album, it was my discover of like, you know, who am I? And like when I was naming the album, I really thought a lot about it. There was like options like, you know, number one girl. And then a lot of people did like, what about Rosie? And at first I was like, it seems a bit like narcissistic. ..I'm not sure. And then it slowly grew on me. And then, you know, just the idea of it being Rosie because Rosé has been such a big part of my life. And that's what we present ourselves as Blackpink, Blackpink Rosé. And I felt like this was very opposite. And so I noticed that it was closer to kind of introducing a different version of me, like because it combined all the stories I would talk about with my friends and family. And they call me Rosie at home. And of course, the online name that the company had made for me from at the beginning of Blackpink, I remember when it happened was like the day before they released my picture, profile picture, they were like, Rosé. And like the name got announced.”

hiro

35,872 次观看 • 7 个月前