Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A 21-year-old left OpenAI, wrote a PDF, and it printed billions. They call it the "billion-dollar PDF" - once a decade someone crystallizes a technological shift into one paper, and everyone who reads it early gets rich. Black-Scholes. The Bitcoin whitepaper. Sequoia's RIP Good Times. Buffett's Superinvestors. The next... show more

st1ne

5,135 subscribers

573,476 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I love Jeremy's idea of the billion dollar PDF. Every so often someone crystallizes an idea at just the right moment. It sets the narrative for that era and billions of dollars organize around it. - The Bitcoin white paper - Situational Awareness - Attention Is All You Need - Brian Arthur's Increasing Returns - Software is Eating the World

I love Jeremy's idea of the billion dollar PDF. Every so often someone crystallizes an idea at just the right moment. It sets the narrative for that era and billions of dollars organize around it. - The Bitcoin white paper - Situational Awareness - Attention Is All You Need - Brian Arthur's Increasing Returns - Software is Eating the World

Patrick OShaughnessy

86,008 views • 2 months ago

She gets it The told you crypto is a scam The dollar is the scam the whole time They manipulated everyone to think crypto is a scam and riddled it with rugs so your only thinking it’s a scam And not it being the next money system Few see though it

She gets it The told you crypto is a scam The dollar is the scam the whole time They manipulated everyone to think crypto is a scam and riddled it with rugs so your only thinking it’s a scam And not it being the next money system Few see though it

The Crypto Philosopher

37,510 views • 1 year ago

“A visa is a visitor, it’s not a right … If you have the power to deny someone a visa before they get one, you most certainly have the power to revoke it once they get one and then do something they shouldn’t be doing.” – Secretary Marco Rubio

“A visa is a visitor, it’s not a right … If you have the power to deny someone a visa before they get one, you most certainly have the power to revoke it once they get one and then do something they shouldn’t be doing.” – Secretary Marco Rubio

Department of State

1,326,216 views • 9 months ago

“A visa is a visitor, it’s not a right … If you have the power to deny someone a visa before they get one, you most certainly have the power to revoke it once they get one and then do something they shouldn’t be doing.” – Secretary of State Marco Rubio

“A visa is a visitor, it’s not a right … If you have the power to deny someone a visa before they get one, you most certainly have the power to revoke it once they get one and then do something they shouldn’t be doing.” – Secretary of State Marco Rubio

U.S. Asia Pacific Media Hub

53,400 views • 8 months ago

The OFFICIAL preview with my next guest, George Christie. “What they did is they took a tire, they stuffed it full of dynamite, and they took the valve and used it as a pressure-release trigger. They take it in and the bomb goes off. Mongol gets killed. His 15-year-old cousin gets killed.”

The OFFICIAL preview with my next guest, George Christie. “What they did is they took a tire, they stuffed it full of dynamite, and they took the valve and used it as a pressure-release trigger. They take it in and the bomb goes off. Mongol gets killed. His 15-year-old cousin gets killed.”

Shawn Ryan

71,754 views • 1 month ago

This is the most valuable PDF you can give to Claude. The Higgsfield team said they spent $1M on R&D for their film and distilled it into a PDF you can steal. This is the holy grail for filmmakers. Here's the info (and download link) Bookmark this 👇🏼🧵

This is the most valuable PDF you can give to Claude. The Higgsfield team said they spent $1M on R&D for their film and distilled it into a PDF you can steal. This is the holy grail for filmmakers. Here's the info (and download link) Bookmark this 👇🏼🧵

PJ Ace

99,598 views • 1 month ago

This guy built a tool that turns any document into a full animated explainer video. Drop in a PDF, an article or a research paper and it structures the content into a clear step-by-step explanation, then generates an animated video with narration built around it. The reason it stands out is the animation quality. You genuinely can't tell the videos are AI made. Reading a 40-page PDF is brutal. Turning it into a 3-minute video you actually absorb is the kind of thing everyone will end up using.

This guy built a tool that turns any document into a full animated explainer video. Drop in a PDF, an article or a research paper and it structures the content into a clear step-by-step explanation, then generates an animated video with narration built around it. The reason it stands out is the animation quality. You genuinely can't tell the videos are AI made. Reading a 40-page PDF is brutal. Turning it into a 3-minute video you actually absorb is the kind of thing everyone will end up using.

0xMarioNawfal

59,578 views • 2 months ago

The Bible isn’t just a good book - it’s the book. It’s God-breathed, alive, and powerful. It reads you, corrects you, and lights your path. Know the Word. Live the Word. Love the One who wrote it.

The Bible isn’t just a good book - it’s the book. It’s God-breathed, alive, and powerful. It reads you, corrects you, and lights your path. Know the Word. Live the Word. Love the One who wrote it.

Pastor John Hagee

19,909 views • 10 months ago

MAGA cannot fathom that they are in the minority. Donald J Trump is a PDF file and it is time to release the files.

MAGA cannot fathom that they are in the minority. Donald J Trump is a PDF file and it is time to release the files.

MAGA Cult Slayer

12,523 views • 5 months ago

I wrote a headline for a billion dollar brand this year (literally does billions every year in revenue) The format goes like this: [Positive Attribute] & [Positive Attribute], just like the [target demo] that [verb] it. At Original Grain, our winning version has been: "Smooth & Unique, just like the men who wear it" If I wrote one for a whiskey brand, I'd say "Bold & complex, just like the guys who drink it" If I wrote one for a knife company, I'd say, "Sharp & reliable, just like the chefs who trust it" Stop talking about your product, and start marketing towards the aspirational view your customers have of themselves

Nate Lagos📝📈

14,390 views • 2 years ago

🐻‍❄️ ah that’s right, this guy wrote shining star! 👩 really? it’s so good though 👤 i should’ve written it better, with a friend in the band named kim donghyun 🐻‍❄️ the guy who shaved his head 👤 the baldie 👩 (caption: i’m also a baldie…) 🐻‍❄️ they both wrote a band song and said they wanted to give it to me 👩 wow it was so good 👤 we wrote it but we thought a handsome guy should sing it

🐻‍❄️ ah that’s right, this guy wrote shining star! 👩 really? it’s so good though 👤 i should’ve written it better, with a friend in the band named kim donghyun 🐻‍❄️ the guy who shaved his head 👤 the baldie 👩 (caption: i’m also a baldie…) 🐻‍❄️ they both wrote a band song and said they wanted to give it to me 👩 wow it was so good 👤 we wrote it but we thought a handsome guy should sing it

🎧

132,755 views • 6 months ago

You have 100 dollars and you want 200. Betting red one dollar at a time, your chance is one in 33,171. Betting the whole 100 on a single spin, it is 47.4 percent. The careful version is fifteen thousand times worse. This is also the arithmetic of your trading account, and it means almost everything you have been taught about managing risk is, in the strict mathematical sense, a method for losing more reliably. An MIT professor works this out on a blackboard in a lecture on random walks. The result is called gambler's ruin. Two and a half points of disadvantage is nothing on one spin. But a dollar at a time you are not making one spin, you are making hundreds, and the edge gets a fresh attempt at you on every one of them. It was never the size of the disadvantage. It is the number of times you agree to face it. One hundred on red, once: 47.4 percent. Twenty dollar bets: 37.3 percent. Five dollar bets: 11.1 percent. One dollar bets: 0.003 percent. Mathematicians call the right answer bold play. It was proved optimal for unfavourable games in 1965. It is not a strategy for winning. It is the least ruinous way to play a game you should not be in. If your edge after spread and fees is negative, and for most active retail accounts it is, then your position sizing rule is not protecting you. Risking one percent per trade is the one dollar bet. It arrives at zero with near certainty, just politely, over a longer period, with a spreadsheet. Discipline does not beat a negative edge. It schedules it. All of this reverses if you have a real edge. Then small and frequent is correct and bold play is madness. So the only question that has ever mattered is whether you have one, and the number of people certain they do has never resembled the number who do. Your broker does not need you to be wrong. It needs you to be frequent.

You have 100 dollars and you want 200. Betting red one dollar at a time, your chance is one in 33,171. Betting the whole 100 on a single spin, it is 47.4 percent. The careful version is fifteen thousand times worse. This is also the arithmetic of your trading account, and it means almost everything you have been taught about managing risk is, in the strict mathematical sense, a method for losing more reliably. An MIT professor works this out on a blackboard in a lecture on random walks. The result is called gambler's ruin. Two and a half points of disadvantage is nothing on one spin. But a dollar at a time you are not making one spin, you are making hundreds, and the edge gets a fresh attempt at you on every one of them. It was never the size of the disadvantage. It is the number of times you agree to face it. One hundred on red, once: 47.4 percent. Twenty dollar bets: 37.3 percent. Five dollar bets: 11.1 percent. One dollar bets: 0.003 percent. Mathematicians call the right answer bold play. It was proved optimal for unfavourable games in 1965. It is not a strategy for winning. It is the least ruinous way to play a game you should not be in. If your edge after spread and fees is negative, and for most active retail accounts it is, then your position sizing rule is not protecting you. Risking one percent per trade is the one dollar bet. It arrives at zero with near certainty, just politely, over a longer period, with a spreadsheet. Discipline does not beat a negative edge. It schedules it. All of this reverses if you have a real edge. Then small and frequent is correct and bold play is madness. So the only question that has ever mattered is whether you have one, and the number of people certain they do has never resembled the number who do. Your broker does not need you to be wrong. It needs you to be frequent.

Verax

85,235 views • 20 days ago

Every trader thinks the market is a fair fight. Ed Thorp - the man who beat both the casino and Wall Street - explains why some players simply cannot lose, and it is not about being right. Ed Thorp - math professor who broke blackjack, then ran a hedge fund at 20% a year for decades. he points to one firm that went public and had to reveal its record in the prospectus: "for about the last 1300 trading days they had won every day except one - and the one day they didn't win was because they had a computer problem." 1299 winning days out of 1300. that is not prediction - that is access. these players see the order book 30 milliseconds before you do, and 30 milliseconds is the whole game. your edge dies here. you are sizing bets on a coin flip while someone else reads the coin mid-air. the market was never a fair fight - it is tiered, and most traders sit on the tier that pays. he names the firm, the number, and the man who turned Renaissance around - all in one free interview. the edge was never being smart. it is being early.

Every trader thinks the market is a fair fight. Ed Thorp - the man who beat both the casino and Wall Street - explains why some players simply cannot lose, and it is not about being right. Ed Thorp - math professor who broke blackjack, then ran a hedge fund at 20% a year for decades. he points to one firm that went public and had to reveal its record in the prospectus: "for about the last 1300 trading days they had won every day except one - and the one day they didn't win was because they had a computer problem." 1299 winning days out of 1300. that is not prediction - that is access. these players see the order book 30 milliseconds before you do, and 30 milliseconds is the whole game. your edge dies here. you are sizing bets on a coin flip while someone else reads the coin mid-air. the market was never a fair fight - it is tiered, and most traders sit on the tier that pays. he names the firm, the number, and the man who turned Renaissance around - all in one free interview. the edge was never being smart. it is being early.

Di Krass

32,436 views • 25 days ago

Martin Shkreli says Ken Griffin makes a free $5 to $10 billion every decade by being the guy everyone calls "The prime brokers, the Goldman's and Bank of America's, they do so much business with Citadel, and they've done this before. They know who to go to." "They know the right person to call is Ken, and he is really going out of his way to make himself the guy to call." "I think that is a great brand, because you may not need to be that guy more than once every decade. But once a decade, to make a free $5 billion or $10 billion. It's a great guy to be. He becomes a dependable, trusted partner to these banks."

dnap

250,467 views • 1 month ago

When the market gets boring and quiet and everyone turns bearish, I like to come back to the story of how I fucked it all up. And I fucked it up a lot of ways, because crypto is genuinely hard. People think the cycles just repeat. They don't. Every one has a different texture, a different context, and it is so easy to get it wrong. I got in back in 2013. Wrote the first ever macro piece on Bitcoin, and bought at $200, straight into a peak right before it slammed down and I felt like an idiot. But I had a thesis. And the mistake was never the thesis. It was letting the noise talk me out of it... selling, trading around it, being clever, when the only thing that ever worked was holding. That is the whole lesson, and it is the one that matters most at times like this. Crypto is one of the only real secular trends that lets you build wealth against the debasement of your salary. And as the Exponential Age accelerates, it matters more, not less. So when the market gets depressing, I do the same thing every time. I go back to the thesis, and I accumulate. Zoom out.

When the market gets boring and quiet and everyone turns bearish, I like to come back to the story of how I fucked it all up. And I fucked it up a lot of ways, because crypto is genuinely hard. People think the cycles just repeat. They don't. Every one has a different texture, a different context, and it is so easy to get it wrong. I got in back in 2013. Wrote the first ever macro piece on Bitcoin, and bought at $200, straight into a peak right before it slammed down and I felt like an idiot. But I had a thesis. And the mistake was never the thesis. It was letting the noise talk me out of it... selling, trading around it, being clever, when the only thing that ever worked was holding. That is the whole lesson, and it is the one that matters most at times like this. Crypto is one of the only real secular trends that lets you build wealth against the debasement of your salary. And as the Exponential Age accelerates, it matters more, not less. So when the market gets depressing, I do the same thing every time. I go back to the thesis, and I accumulate. Zoom out.

Raoul Pal

187,494 views • 1 month ago

World Liberty Coin was a scam from the rip. They took a website and the Trump last name, and turned it into a billon dollar shitcoin. They scammed their investors out of millions of dollar. They will never get their money back.

World Liberty Coin was a scam from the rip. They took a website and the Trump last name, and turned it into a billon dollar shitcoin. They scammed their investors out of millions of dollar. They will never get their money back.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

78,417 views • 5 months ago

Jane Street spent $6 billion and 4,032 GPUs on one thing: AI agents that loop through trading strategies 100x faster than any human. Generate, backtest, kill, repeat - thousands a week, until one survives data it's never seen. That loop is why they made $39.6 billion last year while 89% of retail went broke trading one idea they never stress-tested. The edge was never a smarter idea. It was volume. They test 100 strategies for every 1 you test by hand, and a second agent kills the 97 that only look good on old data before a dollar goes live. Now the entire loop fits in a chat box. Horizon takes one plain-English sentence and spins up the same two agents. One builds your strategy, one tries to kill it - backtests 5 years in seconds, and only what survives goes live on your exchange. The $150 billion setup. Free while beta open. Bookmark this & read the full breakdown below - the exact two-agent loop, step by step, and who just handed it to retail.

Jane Street spent $6 billion and 4,032 GPUs on one thing: AI agents that loop through trading strategies 100x faster than any human. Generate, backtest, kill, repeat - thousands a week, until one survives data it's never seen. That loop is why they made $39.6 billion last year while 89% of retail went broke trading one idea they never stress-tested. The edge was never a smarter idea. It was volume. They test 100 strategies for every 1 you test by hand, and a second agent kills the 97 that only look good on old data before a dollar goes live. Now the entire loop fits in a chat box. Horizon takes one plain-English sentence and spins up the same two agents. One builds your strategy, one tries to kill it - backtests 5 years in seconds, and only what survives goes live on your exchange. The $150 billion setup. Free while beta open. Bookmark this & read the full breakdown below - the exact two-agent loop, step by step, and who just handed it to retail.

cvxv666

318,185 views • 2 months ago

EcoCash just launched a new app, one they call a Super App. They gave me early access for a couple of weeks before it was released to review it and, they asked that I make an honest video about it, have you used the new app? EcoCash #zimbabwe #econet #ecocash

EcoCash just launched a new app, one they call a Super App. They gave me early access for a couple of weeks before it was released to review it and, they asked that I make an honest video about it, have you used the new app? EcoCash #zimbabwe #econet #ecocash

Danny that Guy

14,339 views • 4 months ago