正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

A 25 part thread PLEASE #Retweet for wider audience Johan Lange comes out after the January window and seriously tries to justify failure by saying “there were only 33 Premier League transfers.” That’s not analysis. That’s an excuse. A weak, pathetic one. #Spurs #COYS #LangeOUT

17,152 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Here it is: One minute and fifty seconds of seditious conspiracy — caught on videotape: Rep. Wesley Hunt exposes Antifa’s continued acts of terrorism across the country including at the White House — to the point that President Trump had to be brought to a bunker. “Wait a minute — that’s not January 6th. That’s May 31st, 2020. That’s right in front of the White House. That’s where the President lives. And at the time, President Trump was ushered into a bunker because his life was being threatened. Where was the hotline? Next photo. That’s not January 6th either. That’s July 27th. That’s in Portland — and that is Antifa rioting and pillaging our country. Where was the hotline? Next slide. Well, hot damn — that’s not January 6th either. Those are more rioters destroying and looting in Salt Lake City. That’s a lot. I believe that’s it — but wait, there’s more. And that’s not January 6th either. That’s June 1st, 2020 — the streets of D.C. being rioted and pillaged by mobs. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the hotline? This is what domestic terror looks like. This is not a school board meeting. There was no hotline for any of these riots — yet we’re going to have a hotline to report parents for caring about their children’s education. Even further, the DOJ would rather investigate a thousand more people from January 6th than a single person in these photos. What a shame. And that is why this is no longer the Department of Justice — it is the Department of Subjective Justice. And with that, I yield back.” 📝 The whole damn thing was deliberately sanctioned by the Democrats.

Deep Leaks

11,248 次观看 • 4 天前

Here it is: One minute and fifty seconds of seditious conspiracy — caught on videotape: Rep. Wesley Hunt exposes Antifa’s continued acts of terrorism across the country including at the White House — to the point that President Trump had to be brought to a bunker. “Wait a minute — that’s not January 6th. That’s May 31st, 2020. That’s right in front of the White House. That’s where the President lives. And at the time, President Trump was ushered into a bunker because his life was being threatened. Where was the hotline? Next photo. That’s not January 6th either. That’s July 27th. That’s in Portland — and that is Antifa rioting and pillaging our country. Where was the hotline? Next slide. Well, hot damn — that’s not January 6th either. Those are more rioters destroying and looting in Salt Lake City. That’s a lot. I believe that’s it — but wait, there’s more. And that’s not January 6th either. That’s June 1st, 2020 — the streets of D.C. being rioted and pillaged by mobs. Where’s the outrage? Where’s the hotline? This is what domestic terror looks like. This is not a school board meeting. There was no hotline for any of these riots — yet we’re going to have a hotline to report parents for caring about their children’s education. Even further, the DOJ would rather investigate a thousand more people from January 6th than a single person in these photos. What a shame. And that is why this is no longer the Department of Justice — it is the Department of Subjective Justice. And with that, I yield back.” 📝 The whole damn thing was deliberately sanctioned by the Democrats.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

1,049,816 次观看 • 11 个月前

If J7 sent Baker something that sounded like she might actually do it, taking it seriously is the only decent option. taking it seriously is the only non-asshole move. That’s not “watching over her.” That’s not being a creep. That’s not turning on a friend. That’s not doing the thing Jess would have crucified him for not doing. That’s the whole point. Jess doesn’t get to invent the rule after the fact. She doesn’t get to say Baker was wrong for treating a concerning message like a concerning message, then pretend she’d have praised him if he’d ignored it. If he’d shrugged and something happened, she’d be first in line calling him heartless. You already know that. Everyone watching this already knows that. So this isn’t about J7. If it were, the question would be simple: did he take a possible crisis seriously, or did he blow it off? He took it seriously. That’s the part Jess can’t stand, because it doesn’t fit the story she needs. The story needs Baker as the guy who used J7, discarded J7, or failed J7. Not the guy who actually paid attention when it counted. That’s why “stop watching him” is so gross. It’s not a safety argument. It’s not a loyalty argument. It’s an audience-control argument. Don’t look at the receipts. Don’t notice the double standard. Don’t ask what she’d have said if he’d done the opposite. Just leave, so the narrative doesn’t have to compete with reality. Baker didn’t turn people against J7 by taking her seriously. Jess is turning people against Baker for the crime of not playing along. Telling people to stop watching is the tell. When the argument stops being “here’s what happened” and becomes “don’t look at the other guy,” it’s not about J7 anymore. It’s about controlling the room. That’s the ugly part. Not the concern. The rewrite.

Daisy

14,161 次观看 • 5 天前