Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

A 25-page report from three former senior intelligence officers, detailing counter-terrorism and AFP failures, has been submitted to the Royal Commission. One officer who asked to give evidence has been denied the chance. Why? Because that evidence would put the Albanese government under the lights and raise hard questions... about what happened in the lead-up to Bondi. Tony Abbott says senior counter-terrorism officers were told to ease off Islamic terrorism and focus on the far right instead. That is not a coincidence. Labor’s strategy has been to smear critics as “hard right” so it never has to answer for its own failures. The result is a government that shifted attention away from the Islamist threat while treating Muslim votes as too important to risk. Fifteen people were murdered at Bondi. The media has not addressed this issue and remains silent and this is also disturbing, Labor smears critics as “far right” so it never has to answer. Too much of the press plays along. Bondi was not a mystery. The cover-up is the story they will NOT run.show more

katy 🌸

82,352 subscribers

15,689 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

It’s crystal clear what happened. The Albanese government diverted anti-terrorism resources and attention away from Islamic extremism toward the so-called “far right,” and it did so for pure nakedly political reasons. That choice left the country exposed. Bondi was the result. That is why Albanese first resisted a Royal Commission. He did not want a serious examination of the consequences of putting his political interests ahead of national security. And Remember how quickly the ABC told the country that Bondi had nothing to do with Islamic extremism — even after an ISIS flag was found in the terrorists’ car. The ABC was scrambling to try and cover up for the Albanese regime. When the demand for a Royal Commission became politically unbearable, Albanese relented. But he structured it to fail. A whitewash. We have now had the farcical spectacle of Netball Australia giving evidence while the AFP Commissioner and senior members of the Albanese government have not been properly grilled on the diversion of counter-terrorism resources away from Islamic extremism. The whole process is a whitewash. I hope One Nation adopts a policy of holding a fair-dinkum Royal Commission into Bondi — one that actually examines how this government ranked political convenience above the safety of the nation.

It’s crystal clear what happened. The Albanese government diverted anti-terrorism resources and attention away from Islamic extremism toward the so-called “far right,” and it did so for pure nakedly political reasons. That choice left the country exposed. Bondi was the result. That is why Albanese first resisted a Royal Commission. He did not want a serious examination of the consequences of putting his political interests ahead of national security. And Remember how quickly the ABC told the country that Bondi had nothing to do with Islamic extremism — even after an ISIS flag was found in the terrorists’ car. The ABC was scrambling to try and cover up for the Albanese regime. When the demand for a Royal Commission became politically unbearable, Albanese relented. But he structured it to fail. A whitewash. We have now had the farcical spectacle of Netball Australia giving evidence while the AFP Commissioner and senior members of the Albanese government have not been properly grilled on the diversion of counter-terrorism resources away from Islamic extremism. The whole process is a whitewash. I hope One Nation adopts a policy of holding a fair-dinkum Royal Commission into Bondi — one that actually examines how this government ranked political convenience above the safety of the nation.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

45,441 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Anthony Albanese has shown weakness and poor judgment. An inquiry into antisemitism and social cohesion is not equivalent to a targeted inquiry into the events leading to the Bondi ISIS inspired massacre. All he has done is devise a strategy to mislead the public, making the terms broad and diffuse to avoid accountability. The Royal Commission should focus specifically on the Bondi incident and the conduct of Albanese and his government in the lead-up to it.

Anthony Albanese has shown weakness and poor judgment. An inquiry into antisemitism and social cohesion is not equivalent to a targeted inquiry into the events leading to the Bondi ISIS inspired massacre. All he has done is devise a strategy to mislead the public, making the terms broad and diffuse to avoid accountability. The Royal Commission should focus specifically on the Bondi incident and the conduct of Albanese and his government in the lead-up to it.

katy 🌸

14,802 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

British convert to Islam Teresa Diamond from Southend-on-Sea shared a video claiming that the shooting at Bondi Beach was carried out by 'IOF soldiers' and that the victims were not Jews but Zionists. She also stated, 'Any Zionist that is taken off this planet... the more Zionists that go, the better place it will be.' She has previously been reported to both Essex Police (Essex Police) and Counter Terrorism Policing (Counter Terrorism Policing), but they appear to have done nothing about her. Why?

British convert to Islam Teresa Diamond from Southend-on-Sea shared a video claiming that the shooting at Bondi Beach was carried out by 'IOF soldiers' and that the victims were not Jews but Zionists. She also stated, 'Any Zionist that is taken off this planet... the more Zionists that go, the better place it will be.' She has previously been reported to both Essex Police (Essex Police) and Counter Terrorism Policing (Counter Terrorism Policing), but they appear to have done nothing about her. Why?

GnasherJew®גנאשר

328,855 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

971,665 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Tony Burke says he'll be cracking down on hate speech and hate symbols after Bondi because ... "Neo-nazi's". After what has just occurred in Australia, does anyone trust this government to manage a special "prescribed list" separate to the terrorism listing. They'll focus on the "far right" and trying to stop the NSN from forming a political party not the real threat, just as they have been doing all along. Before long they'll be vetting all political parties. Regardless of what you think of the NSN, that's not democracy.

Tony Burke says he'll be cracking down on hate speech and hate symbols after Bondi because ... "Neo-nazi's". After what has just occurred in Australia, does anyone trust this government to manage a special "prescribed list" separate to the terrorism listing. They'll focus on the "far right" and trying to stop the NSN from forming a political party not the real threat, just as they have been doing all along. Before long they'll be vetting all political parties. Regardless of what you think of the NSN, that's not democracy.

Francynancy

71,384 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗪 𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗗𝗚𝗘𝗡: Democracy Is Under Threat Like Never Before, and It’s Coming from Our Own Institutions “The very concept of the democracy that we’ve taken for granted all of our lives is under threat as it never has been before,” lamented Andrew Bridgen at the Citizen’s Initiative against the WHO pandemic treaty. “And it’s not just in my country; it’s not across Europe. It is across the whole of the world. It’s not from external armies mounding up on our borders this time, but it is from the corruption and the decay of our own institutions are allowing this to happen.” He continued. “Public health and the decisions surrounding it now exist as a monopoly of the WHO, headed up by bureaucrats in Geneva, whose leadership has been embroiled in scandal after scandal. And the majority of the influence on the WHO now is by external entities. And indeed, as has been mentioned, one of the richest men in the world [Bill Gates] has a massive influence over the WHO ... So, it’s basically pay-to-play.” “Any parliament that decides to abdicate its responsibilities to its constituents does not deserve the name of being a parliament and does not deserve a seat in any elected assembly. We have no right to relinquish our sovereignty [to the WHO], the sovereignty of our nations, because it’s not mine to give away, it’s not any of [ours] to give away. Sovereignty always belongs to the people, and every election should be returned back to the people, where they will again decide who they allow to represent them.” ------------------------------ Share if you care. And follow (The Vigilant Fox 🦊) for more newsworthy clips.

𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗪 𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗗𝗚𝗘𝗡: Democracy Is Under Threat Like Never Before, and It’s Coming from Our Own Institutions “The very concept of the democracy that we’ve taken for granted all of our lives is under threat as it never has been before,” lamented Andrew Bridgen at the Citizen’s Initiative against the WHO pandemic treaty. “And it’s not just in my country; it’s not across Europe. It is across the whole of the world. It’s not from external armies mounding up on our borders this time, but it is from the corruption and the decay of our own institutions are allowing this to happen.” He continued. “Public health and the decisions surrounding it now exist as a monopoly of the WHO, headed up by bureaucrats in Geneva, whose leadership has been embroiled in scandal after scandal. And the majority of the influence on the WHO now is by external entities. And indeed, as has been mentioned, one of the richest men in the world [Bill Gates] has a massive influence over the WHO ... So, it’s basically pay-to-play.” “Any parliament that decides to abdicate its responsibilities to its constituents does not deserve the name of being a parliament and does not deserve a seat in any elected assembly. We have no right to relinquish our sovereignty [to the WHO], the sovereignty of our nations, because it’s not mine to give away, it’s not any of [ours] to give away. Sovereignty always belongs to the people, and every election should be returned back to the people, where they will again decide who they allow to represent them.” ------------------------------ Share if you care. And follow (The Vigilant Fox 🦊) for more newsworthy clips.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

350,941 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

As a rift between Democrats and the Israeli government grows, former senior advisor under President Biden, Amos Hochstein, says it demonstrates what “Prime Minister Netanyahu has sacrificed Israel's interests in the United States.” “The most important asset Israel has is not its military or its intelligence, it's the special relationship with the United States that has been bipartisan for so many decades,” he says. “He has destroyed that because he has decided to become not just part of the Republican party, but he's decided to become just an appendage of Donald Trump.”

As a rift between Democrats and the Israeli government grows, former senior advisor under President Biden, Amos Hochstein, says it demonstrates what “Prime Minister Netanyahu has sacrificed Israel's interests in the United States.” “The most important asset Israel has is not its military or its intelligence, it's the special relationship with the United States that has been bipartisan for so many decades,” he says. “He has destroyed that because he has decided to become not just part of the Republican party, but he's decided to become just an appendage of Donald Trump.”

Face The Nation

205,475 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is what terrorism now looks like in the UK. Yesterday, the Court of Appeal accepted the Government's appeal and ruled that the Home Secretary's proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation was lawful. Amnesty International is deeply disappointed by this decision. Treating direct action as terrorism is a dangerous misuse of counter-terrorism powers and has led to thousands of arrests of entirely peaceful protesters - something that will long be remembered as a deeply shameful chapter in our history. The fight is far from over. We will continue to challenge the government's efforts to crack down on our right to protest and hold power to account.

This is what terrorism now looks like in the UK. Yesterday, the Court of Appeal accepted the Government's appeal and ruled that the Home Secretary's proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation was lawful. Amnesty International is deeply disappointed by this decision. Treating direct action as terrorism is a dangerous misuse of counter-terrorism powers and has led to thousands of arrests of entirely peaceful protesters - something that will long be remembered as a deeply shameful chapter in our history. The fight is far from over. We will continue to challenge the government's efforts to crack down on our right to protest and hold power to account.

Amnesty UK

22,565 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“The government will introduce legislation which will shield intelligence officials and politicians giving evidence to the Bondi Royal Commission. “This could include protecting intelligence officers, who may give evidence in camera, when they reveal information normally banned by security laws,” he said. “It will also include protecting politicians should they be asked about deliberations of the National Security Committee of the Cabinet or other discussions. “My understanding is the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell, has asked for these protections.” ••••••••••••••••• I fail to see what information regarding the Bondi shooters is so sensitive that it can’t be disclosed. The Australian public have a right to know why the Intelligence agencies failed to prevent the shootings at Bondi. There needs to be much greater scrutiny of our intelligence agencies. They are extremely powerful and should be held to account like every other government department is. They have a track record of avoiding scrutiny particularly around COVID and weapons of mass destruction. People First is the only party who wants to hold these agencies to account. Please support us at

“The government will introduce legislation which will shield intelligence officials and politicians giving evidence to the Bondi Royal Commission. “This could include protecting intelligence officers, who may give evidence in camera, when they reveal information normally banned by security laws,” he said. “It will also include protecting politicians should they be asked about deliberations of the National Security Committee of the Cabinet or other discussions. “My understanding is the Royal Commissioner, Virginia Bell, has asked for these protections.” ••••••••••••••••• I fail to see what information regarding the Bondi shooters is so sensitive that it can’t be disclosed. The Australian public have a right to know why the Intelligence agencies failed to prevent the shootings at Bondi. There needs to be much greater scrutiny of our intelligence agencies. They are extremely powerful and should be held to account like every other government department is. They have a track record of avoiding scrutiny particularly around COVID and weapons of mass destruction. People First is the only party who wants to hold these agencies to account. Please support us at

Gerard Rennick

14,868 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

CBC is priming the public for what’s coming in regard to trade concessions. They have clearly just been given all of this info from the PMO and were told to hammer the point that supply management is not going anywhere. You can bet this is a done deal. The media just has to softly hand feed it to the elbows up crowd as to convince them its the right decision.

CBC is priming the public for what’s coming in regard to trade concessions. They have clearly just been given all of this info from the PMO and were told to hammer the point that supply management is not going anywhere. You can bet this is a done deal. The media just has to softly hand feed it to the elbows up crowd as to convince them its the right decision.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

58,333 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Mamdani on Arch/Ballroom/Club Rose Garden: My message would be that this is not what government has to be. This is not the only vision for what it looks like to have politics in this country—that is so divorced from the needs and wants of everyday people. And what we are looking to show in New York City is an alternative to what has led so many to become disenchanted with the political process. We want to show that not only can government work, but it must, and that at its core, our responsibility is to working people—to ensure that we’re doing everything to make their lives easier. That has to be what drives our actions, and for too long, government has felt more like a distraction than a fulfillment of the needs of the people who’ve been left behind by the politics of today.

Mamdani on Arch/Ballroom/Club Rose Garden: My message would be that this is not what government has to be. This is not the only vision for what it looks like to have politics in this country—that is so divorced from the needs and wants of everyday people. And what we are looking to show in New York City is an alternative to what has led so many to become disenchanted with the political process. We want to show that not only can government work, but it must, and that at its core, our responsibility is to working people—to ensure that we’re doing everything to make their lives easier. That has to be what drives our actions, and for too long, government has felt more like a distraction than a fulfillment of the needs of the people who’ve been left behind by the politics of today.

Acyn

31,743 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Today's ruling by the Court of Appeal is deeply disappointing. This case remains about much more than one group. What’s important for all of us to understand is that proscription is one of the strongest powers the government has. Treating protest as terrorism leaves the door wide open for governments to suppress other protest movements in the future. We have long said that the banning of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation is a grave misuse of counter-terrorism powers with serious consequences for human rights. It is a huge overreach to treat direct action protest as terrorism. Amnesty will continue to defend the freedoms that allow people to speak out and hold the powerful to account.

Today's ruling by the Court of Appeal is deeply disappointing. This case remains about much more than one group. What’s important for all of us to understand is that proscription is one of the strongest powers the government has. Treating protest as terrorism leaves the door wide open for governments to suppress other protest movements in the future. We have long said that the banning of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation is a grave misuse of counter-terrorism powers with serious consequences for human rights. It is a huge overreach to treat direct action protest as terrorism. Amnesty will continue to defend the freedoms that allow people to speak out and hold the powerful to account.

Amnesty UK

15,930 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

For years, the right has ignore the massive about of evidence I have from going undercover with the left and infiltrating their online meetings to record them. Their excuse? “YOU’RE FAT.” And now that I’ve lost the weight, the new talking point is “where’s your saggy skin?” Never forget that not one single person on the right who has been trying to discredit me for years has EVER been able to intellectually debate my work. And the cope now that their favorite excuse has been taken away is real.

For years, the right has ignore the massive about of evidence I have from going undercover with the left and infiltrating their online meetings to record them. Their excuse? “YOU’RE FAT.” And now that I’ve lost the weight, the new talking point is “where’s your saggy skin?” Never forget that not one single person on the right who has been trying to discredit me for years has EVER been able to intellectually debate my work. And the cope now that their favorite excuse has been taken away is real.

Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader

15,031 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's statement inside the Parliament, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I think there was an overreaction by the government side because as far as I understood, what Rahul ji wished to raise was a matter that is already in the public domain. He was basing himself on a published article in the Caravan magazine, which quotes a memoir by General Naravane that is still unpublished. So the government, instead of objecting to the fact that the book has not been published, should have let him speak because, in any case, the magazine is publicly available. Anyone can read the same article that Rahulji has read. It seems to me that the overreaction of the government has needlessly paralysed the house this afternoon. And to my mind, frankly, it would have been healthy for parliament to have allowed the discussion to proceed, which is what parliament is for... The best answer, if the facts are wrong, is to correct the facts, not to prevent the facts from being aired..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's statement inside the Parliament, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I think there was an overreaction by the government side because as far as I understood, what Rahul ji wished to raise was a matter that is already in the public domain. He was basing himself on a published article in the Caravan magazine, which quotes a memoir by General Naravane that is still unpublished. So the government, instead of objecting to the fact that the book has not been published, should have let him speak because, in any case, the magazine is publicly available. Anyone can read the same article that Rahulji has read. It seems to me that the overreaction of the government has needlessly paralysed the house this afternoon. And to my mind, frankly, it would have been healthy for parliament to have allowed the discussion to proceed, which is what parliament is for... The best answer, if the facts are wrong, is to correct the facts, not to prevent the facts from being aired..."

ANI

53,957 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

14,268 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen