Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
A 3D model of the solar system, driven by the sun's gravitation pull. The solar system does not look like a flat spinning mobile. The sun hold 99.8% of the mass in the solar system and it's gravity keeps every planet , asteroid and comet locked in orbit around it.
155,769 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 32

An interesting model. Except for one detail-- the center of mass of the solar system is not exactly in the center of the sun. Depending on the positions of Jupiter and Saturn, the CG is sometimes even outside the sun itself-- making the fluid sun slosh around like a bucket of water. Hence the 11 ans 22 year cycle of sunspots.

That is a 3D representation of a 2D effect.

I have always disliked this representation of gravity. It shows that planets and moons somehow sit “on” something. And while I know it is just a visual aid, it is fundamentally wrong in how it’s visually presented.

So, you think we live in that? On one of those little balls? 🤨

Not how it works at all. Why are people so fucking stupid?

so our solar system is a saggy titty

fake. Das echte Sonnensystem ist weitgehend flach. Die Planeten umkreisen die Sonne nahezu in einer Ebene (der Ekliptik). Ihre Bahnen sind leicht elliptisch, aber sehr kreisähnlich und liegen fast alle in derselben Scheibe.

Looks as if the space time distortion is exaggerated

I might be a little crazy, maybe a lot crazy, but it looks like a woman's panties with 💩 in them! Sorry... that's just a joke....

I've often wondered about this graph, is it just not explaining the model we've accepted so far? This doesn't mean that the model is wrong, but it does raise the question in my mind, is the universe flat, and there are no "up and down" directions in it?

an presentation of gravity model

It doesn't work like this by the way. The pool table with a membrane analogy has led many people astray.

I know space is empty... but what if its just spin acting on something that we assume is empty. Like when you stir a cup of coffee.

All wrong.

It would have curvature from all directions in the 4th dimension toward its center.

Jupiter is the dark/unlit star and should act as an anchor and share a barycenter with the sun to make your model math better! 😉

It looks like the planets are spinning downward in this grid. It seems like the planets will spiral in to the Sun.

So beautiful 🤯

This totally misrepresents what we actually see. We see the planets appearing in the ecliptic plane. This simulation has the planets in a corkscrew well that would appear overhead like styrofoam pellets being drawn down a bathtub drain.

Now show the sun falling in thr gravity well of the milky way Supermassive black hole

And on the other side of the cone?

@AshtonForbes

This is 2D visualisation. Real is beyond our imagination!!?

Should be a grid not a flat surface

The only problem with this is that the Earth and other major planets follow an orbital plane due to having originated from an accretion disc. Therefore, though the strength of the warping is contingent on mass, the depth of warping remains consistent.

Es como si el sistema solar estuviera en caída libre , falta el movimiento porque no es solo rotación .....!!!!

It's a 4d model really

Pretty obvious that’s not how it works

If the equation "Mv = m x f2", (mass velocity is equal to mass times its frequently squared) is correct, then the concept of curved space is wrong. The equation is correct. All matter is formed of standing nodes of frequency, which is why.

@grok is the mass of the sun decreasing the more it burns ? Will it eventually become relatively weightless as it burns itself up completely?

The sun sits in the center not the bottom

doesn't look so intuitive. the balls above should have fallen

