Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
A 470,000-person study found sunscreen users had dramatically higher skin cancer rates and the researchers tried to explain it away. What?! Heather E Heying emphasizes, "they've got three explanations to whisk away their result and then ignore that result for the rest of their discussion, the rest of their... show more
349,669 views • 28 days ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
!["[With] the messenger RNA vaccines...[there are] 10 ways that it can induce cancer...the spike protein alone...will bind to the major suppressor genes...[which] means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, describes for Senator Malcolm Roberts (Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺) et al. during a presentation for Australia's Federal (national) parliament two of the 10 ways that the COVID injections induce cancer in the victims who took the shots. While he mentions the DNA-plasmid/SV40 contamination, here he highlights the phenomenon wherein the "the spike protein alone in messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major [cancer] suppressor genes." Dalgleish notes that this means that "the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40." "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous," Dalgleish says. "The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us." --------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But the messenger RNA vaccines that, we have with the spike protein, that in those 10 ways that it can induce cancer, I mean, there's two or three which are really frightening. One, which has been widely discussed with the contamination issue, is that there are some oncogene stimulants there, SV40 is in the Pfizer. We know that. "We have a list of people here who have been discussed in the Perth conference recently of all the people who have shown the contamination from McKernan in the US, David Speicher, Kony Grao [?], Phillip Buckhaults, etcetera. And there's another paper just come out from Wurzburg [?] that, not only confirms all this but shows that they will convert cells to cancer. So we know that that's a direct thing. "The second thing, which I really want to emphasize, is the spike protein alone and messenger RNA vaccines will bind to the major suppressor genes. Now the suppressor genes are basically your cancer policeman. If you do get cancer, they will suppress it. P53, BRCA, MSH. MSH is well associated with a thing called Lynch Syndrome in colorectal cancer, which is very relevant to the fact we're getting an explosion of colorectal cancers at the moment. So what happens if you have a mutation in any of those three major suppressor genes, you're just unfortunate to be born with it, it means the cancer you would normally get when you were 70 or 80, you are going to get when you're 20, 30, or 40. "By putting this into children, we run the serious risk that they're going to make everybody have the equivalent of mutations of these genes, and it's absolutely horrendous. The very fact that that's a possibility and we're using them for an infectious disease that doesn't kill anybody should strike fear into the heart of all of us. And I believe leaves no doubt at all that these vaccines must be banned now, and anybody who opposes it, anybody says there's reason for it has to be held to account for what not only has happened, but what is going to happen in the future if we persist with this."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1875627291243327905/ext_tw_video_thumb/1875624544422989824/pu/img/htjDAhBiN1-GbCyx.jpg)
![🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1995343450158547189/amplify_video_thumb/1995341157581324288/img/0ZSx3GyaVnAq0C3O.jpg)
