Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A $500M exit is "completely unexciting" to institutional VCs. Sheel Mohnot breaks down the economics behind why, and it changes everything about how founders should think about fundraising. His fund: $140M Their minimum exciting exit: $500M+ Fund math is unforgiving. To return 3x to LPs, they need their winners...

HustleFundVC's profile picture

Hustle Fund 🦛🌽💛

55,179 subscribers

40,649 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimBilim & TeknolojiFinans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 Yorum

Dave McClure profil fotoğrafı
Dave McClure7 ay önce

founders shouldn’t build businesses according to VC math — they should build based on their customer & market opportunity. what VCs need for good fund performance != always good startup advice. (also Sheel is wrong about #LatAm startups — #MercadoLibre & #Nubank are huge)

Francis Santora 🎌 profil fotoğrafı
Francis Santora 🎌7 ay önce

What about Nubank?

Chinmay A. Singh profil fotoğrafı
Chinmay A. Singh8 ay önce

This has been my point with YC and other VCs. When they say "growth matters", they dont say for whom? Customer, Investor, or Founder? If you remove VC from the equation, profitability matters for both the customers and founders. A founder can meaningfully change his life with $5M exit as long as the founder owns 50% company.

Gregor profil fotoğrafı
Gregor8 ay önce

I've seen VCs like Sheel's have a tough time justifying their own returns, let alone their fund's reputation, when exits don't hit those massive targets. This mentality creates a self-fulfilling cycle where VCs prioritize high-risk, high-reward investments over more sustainable ones.

Rafael Costa profil fotoğrafı
Rafael Costa7 ay önce

There will be and there are multiple billion dollar companies built serving Brazil only and/or latam. Some financial profiles down there are hard to come by in the US. I’m talking 100M+ EBITDA company, growing 70-80% YoY… 100pct agree on the global ambition, but there are local oppties that will create 5- 10B companies

Bruno Faviero profil fotoğrafı
Bruno Faviero8 ay önce

Good question when diligencing VCs: what's your MEE?

Marcus Stromeyer profil fotoğrafı
Marcus Stromeyer8 ay önce

What's the source link? Curious to listen to whole thing.

$FKN coin profil fotoğrafı
$FKN coin8 ay önce

I figured this out DAY ONE, and I dont have 200M AUM…. Im a beverage company trying to expand our geographic footprint. THATS THE WAY, BUT…. You gotta have the brand and ideas locked down. We DO!!!!

Alexis Roman profil fotoğrafı
Alexis Roman7 ay önce

Very similar pattern to what we're seeing in SSA. Either markets evolve locally / regionally and help warrant outsized returns. Otherwise founders will have to build global companies that warrant stronger exit multiples.

asif khan profil fotoğrafı
asif khan7 ay önce

Love @pitdesi but isn’t all he’s saying - ‘that one company better pay back for my all my inefficient investing’.

BoxNCase profil fotoğrafı
BoxNCase7 ay önce

True that ..

Chris Lee profil fotoğrafı
Chris Lee7 ay önce

Build for global markets early. You're going to need a product like @deel to scale globally

Ernest🚜 profil fotoğrafı
Ernest🚜8 ay önce

THINK BIG or go HOME

Dominik Warchoł profil fotoğrafı
Dominik Warchoł8 ay önce

This is such a powerful perspective. Your emphasis on thinking globally while launching locally really resonates. It highlights how critical it is for founders to transcend geographical boundaries to achieve those massive outcomes that VCs are targeting. By focusing on global problems, entrepreneurs can unlock market potential that far exceeds their local contexts, thus aligning better with investor expectations.

Jagadeesh profil fotoğrafı
Jagadeesh7 ay önce

Till date betting on top grads and exp tech professionals. So,what is the futuristic model ?

Enguerand / VitroBot profil fotoğrafı
Enguerand / VitroBot7 ay önce

"Think global. Launch local. Scale everywhere." Almost worth tattooing

Benzer Videolar

Former Biden director of message planning says Democrats shouldn't worry about their debt during the midterms. "They are paying down some of the debt. I don't think the DNC cash on hand is what matters here. These are local races and they are out raising Republicans and will be fine. I also don't think we're seeing the need for as much money here. Democrats have won 26 seats in the special elections since Donald Trump was elected. There is a reason for that. People are tired of the chaos and tired of his failed economic policies." Sooo how are they going to fund their candidates in the midterms??? Watch them FLOP all because they didn't have enough money.
0:53

Former Biden director of message planning says Democrats shouldn't worry about their debt during the midterms. "They are paying down some of the debt. I don't think the DNC cash on hand is what matters here. These are local races and they are out raising Republicans and will be fine. I also don't think we're seeing the need for as much money here. Democrats have won 26 seats in the special elections since Donald Trump was elected. There is a reason for that. People are tired of the chaos and tired of his failed economic policies." Sooo how are they going to fund their candidates in the midterms??? Watch them FLOP all because they didn't have enough money.

DeVory Darkins

95,157 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said investors trade more on what they think the Fed will do than on what it should do, a view that sits uneasily with Kevin Warsh's push to say less about the outlook in pursuit of a purer market signal. "Having been on the market side of things for three decades, I think that what markets are looking for is they're looking for any guidance as to where the Fed is going to go. I know that bankers, investment professionals, their number one goal is to produce returns for themselves and their clients. That's their goal, that's the job. And to do that, they both want to look at what the fundamentals of the economy are doing and what they're saying, but I think they respond more based on what they think the Fed will do rather than what they think we should do. And so I think that it's important to take signal back from the markets about how the economy is progressing, but I take more signal about how the economy is progressing from the data, from the stories I hear in the district."
0:47

Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said investors trade more on what they think the Fed will do than on what it should do, a view that sits uneasily with Kevin Warsh's push to say less about the outlook in pursuit of a purer market signal. "Having been on the market side of things for three decades, I think that what markets are looking for is they're looking for any guidance as to where the Fed is going to go. I know that bankers, investment professionals, their number one goal is to produce returns for themselves and their clients. That's their goal, that's the job. And to do that, they both want to look at what the fundamentals of the economy are doing and what they're saying, but I think they respond more based on what they think the Fed will do rather than what they think we should do. And so I think that it's important to take signal back from the markets about how the economy is progressing, but I take more signal about how the economy is progressing from the data, from the stories I hear in the district."

Nick Timiraos

41,293 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).
3:44

Watch this game-changing dissertation on "expert writing." Expert writers write to "think" about the world. 99% of experts write and think at the same time. They use the writing process to help themselves think. This is how they do their best thinking. Write to think about the world. Do this because you care, because you want to be part of progress, because you want to make a dent in the universe. Write to inspire and influence. And when you are finished writing, and you click publish, think about your work this way... the intent of your text is to cause readers to change the way they think about the world. Engagement metrics don't really matter in comparison. Whether or not your text is valuable, depends on whether or not your readers perceive that you have valuably changed what they think, or what they do, or how they decide. One of the reasons it's so hard for smart people to write well is because they don't write to change the way people think about the world. They write to complete a project, to earn a grade, to be assessed. Or they write to publish *their* thoughts without going through a mental and soulful exercise of writing to think about the world, without writing to change how people think about the world. Write to think about the world. Change how people think about the world. In an era of #GenerativeAI, content isn't the end game. Your goal isn't just to get someone's attention, generate reactions, or show up in search. Your mission is to change how people think about the world. Change How People Think About the World. Thank you, Larry McEnerney (now-retired former Director of the University of Chicago's Writing Program).

Brian Solis

113,733 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

🚨 STRAIGHT MIC DROP! GREG GUTFELD: "There are different people. There are people who, when they hear an awful crime, when Molly Tibbetts is m*rdered [by an illegal], they think of their wife, they think of their kids, they think of their sister, they think of their mother." "What do Democrats think about? There's a step before they even think about their family. They think, 'how does it affect my public persona? How does it affect my potential politically? How do I deal with this so that I get instant gratification and empathy?'" "We don't think like that. We don't care. You can call me a monster that's saying all these people are getting deported. I don't care!" "I don't care about any of this performance anymore, Jessica. It's done. And you know what? Neither does Trump. People are voting for the law. They want the law. If you want to cry about m*rderers and r*pists, do it on your own time!"
0:55

🚨 STRAIGHT MIC DROP! GREG GUTFELD: "There are different people. There are people who, when they hear an awful crime, when Molly Tibbetts is m*rdered [by an illegal], they think of their wife, they think of their kids, they think of their sister, they think of their mother." "What do Democrats think about? There's a step before they even think about their family. They think, 'how does it affect my public persona? How does it affect my potential politically? How do I deal with this so that I get instant gratification and empathy?'" "We don't think like that. We don't care. You can call me a monster that's saying all these people are getting deported. I don't care!" "I don't care about any of this performance anymore, Jessica. It's done. And you know what? Neither does Trump. People are voting for the law. They want the law. If you want to cry about m*rderers and r*pists, do it on your own time!"

Eric Daugherty

163,730 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Pep Guardiola hits back at critics telling him to 'focus on football' and not global issues: "OK, you focus on being a journalist as well. You cannot talk about economics, because you are not a journalist specifically about economics, right? You focus on football, [so] don't talk about that. That's why. "They want [me] to remain silent, that is what the world wants, right? Be silent, and don't say anything. I think it's completely the opposite."
0:23

Pep Guardiola hits back at critics telling him to 'focus on football' and not global issues: "OK, you focus on being a journalist as well. You cannot talk about economics, because you are not a journalist specifically about economics, right? You focus on football, [so] don't talk about that. That's why. "They want [me] to remain silent, that is what the world wants, right? Be silent, and don't say anything. I think it's completely the opposite."

Hayters TV

1,718,860 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Liberal White women are batsht crazy…! LOL! Watch for yourself. “They think they are scaring us, but I remember when Saddam Hussein was hanged. I watched that entire video and I felt nothing. I didn't feel joy, I didn't feel relief, I felt nothing. And if they think, if they think(laughs) that what they're doing is filling us with fear, what they don't understand is our psychology. They don't understand it. This will end. These motherfuckers, they are going to be paying for this for the rest of their lives, and so will any single person who supported it. Every single person. Because you think that we're nice, you think that we're weak because we're kind, baby, you have no fucking idea who we are.(laughs) You really don't.”
0:45

Liberal White women are batsht crazy…! LOL! Watch for yourself. “They think they are scaring us, but I remember when Saddam Hussein was hanged. I watched that entire video and I felt nothing. I didn't feel joy, I didn't feel relief, I felt nothing. And if they think, if they think(laughs) that what they're doing is filling us with fear, what they don't understand is our psychology. They don't understand it. This will end. These motherfuckers, they are going to be paying for this for the rest of their lives, and so will any single person who supported it. Every single person. Because you think that we're nice, you think that we're weak because we're kind, baby, you have no fucking idea who we are.(laughs) You really don't.”

Gunther Eagleman™

99,590 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Sam Altman thinks OpenAI should be a platform, not a product company: "What I think most people want is the single interface to their own personal or their company's AGI that can kinda help them with whatever they need, and then the ability with an API to build anything they want on top of it." "That is the platform that we should offer to the world." "I don't think we should go build every product category. I don't think we should go try to compete with all of our customers. I don't think we should try to subsume the entire economy." "I think we should offer this platform and try to have a hundred million new businesses and eight billion people use it in all kinds of new ways." "So one kind of direct interface to the product, one API for people to use however they want. Those eventually come more and more together too, and then it's all about what people do with it, build on top of it." Sam Altman w/ David Senra
1:45

Sam Altman thinks OpenAI should be a platform, not a product company: "What I think most people want is the single interface to their own personal or their company's AGI that can kinda help them with whatever they need, and then the ability with an API to build anything they want on top of it." "That is the platform that we should offer to the world." "I don't think we should go build every product category. I don't think we should go try to compete with all of our customers. I don't think we should try to subsume the entire economy." "I think we should offer this platform and try to have a hundred million new businesses and eight billion people use it in all kinds of new ways." "So one kind of direct interface to the product, one API for people to use however they want. Those eventually come more and more together too, and then it's all about what people do with it, build on top of it." Sam Altman w/ David Senra

a16z

61,919 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

🚨CFO Blaise Ingoglia says local governments are LYING when they say they will need to cut first responders when property taxes go away! “If you hear a local government official or an elected official say that if they have to cut their budget, that we are going to lose fire and police, you direct them to me, because I will prove to them that they have more than enough money to cut the budget, offer property tax relief, but yet also protect their first responders. And if a local government says that you are going to have longer wait times, we are not going to be able to hire enough police or deputies, what they are basically saying is that the last thing that they are thinking about is law enforcement, if that is the first thing that they are looking to cut. When you build the budget, the first rule of government is to protect its citizens.”
1:23

🚨CFO Blaise Ingoglia says local governments are LYING when they say they will need to cut first responders when property taxes go away! “If you hear a local government official or an elected official say that if they have to cut their budget, that we are going to lose fire and police, you direct them to me, because I will prove to them that they have more than enough money to cut the budget, offer property tax relief, but yet also protect their first responders. And if a local government says that you are going to have longer wait times, we are not going to be able to hire enough police or deputies, what they are basically saying is that the last thing that they are thinking about is law enforcement, if that is the first thing that they are looking to cut. When you build the budget, the first rule of government is to protect its citizens.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

50,388 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

William got margin called and pledged over $1B of his own stock to fund Column. He explains why extreme personal risk is what makes great founders, and why we see less of it today: "I think that the good founders bet on themselves and take an extreme amount of risk to do that. The extreme amount of risk part is something that we no longer have. But when there's literally only one door in front of you. You don't have a choice, and that fear and innate desire creates another part of you. It creates creativity, it creates inspiration. It's extremely valuable part of the founder journey. And in many ways, Silicon Valley we've actually removed that. I don't know why we don't talk about it more. If you go back to pre 2008, you're on the edge of the knife. We don't create environments where a founder has to bet themselves. I think starting companies are just too f**king safe. It's caused a lot of companies to be super safe companies like, we're gonna pivot to AI...that's not bold, that's not ambitious. It's because we are attracting founders that actually want to be employees. They don't think if I don't pull this off, I'm going to become bankrupt. My life is over and I think that's pretty healthy. That's when you bring out the rawness of humanity and I don't see that very much anymore. The weird thing is an early stage employee takes way more risk than an early stage founder. And I don't think we should actually de-risk the early stage employee. I just think we need to increase the risk for founders. I think we need to make failure much more expensive."
2:44

William got margin called and pledged over $1B of his own stock to fund Column. He explains why extreme personal risk is what makes great founders, and why we see less of it today: "I think that the good founders bet on themselves and take an extreme amount of risk to do that. The extreme amount of risk part is something that we no longer have. But when there's literally only one door in front of you. You don't have a choice, and that fear and innate desire creates another part of you. It creates creativity, it creates inspiration. It's extremely valuable part of the founder journey. And in many ways, Silicon Valley we've actually removed that. I don't know why we don't talk about it more. If you go back to pre 2008, you're on the edge of the knife. We don't create environments where a founder has to bet themselves. I think starting companies are just too f**king safe. It's caused a lot of companies to be super safe companies like, we're gonna pivot to AI...that's not bold, that's not ambitious. It's because we are attracting founders that actually want to be employees. They don't think if I don't pull this off, I'm going to become bankrupt. My life is over and I think that's pretty healthy. That's when you bring out the rawness of humanity and I don't see that very much anymore. The weird thing is an early stage employee takes way more risk than an early stage founder. And I don't think we should actually de-risk the early stage employee. I just think we need to increase the risk for founders. I think we need to make failure much more expensive."

Patrick OShaughnessy

86,597 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.
3:03

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

JUST NOW: Democrat Sen. John Fetterman DOUBLES DOWN on his calls to build Trump’s ballroom — REBUKES his own party for BLOCKING it “I think the REAL reason people are fighting about building the ballroom is their TDS! (Trump Derangement Syndrome)” "Just because the president happens to agree, as I do, that we need a new ballroom facility for events just like this... Why can't we just agree?! Let's just build this thing!"
1:20

JUST NOW: Democrat Sen. John Fetterman DOUBLES DOWN on his calls to build Trump’s ballroom — REBUKES his own party for BLOCKING it “I think the REAL reason people are fighting about building the ballroom is their TDS! (Trump Derangement Syndrome)” "Just because the president happens to agree, as I do, that we need a new ballroom facility for events just like this... Why can't we just agree?! Let's just build this thing!"

Nick Sortor

58,542 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 President Trump just confirmed CHINA is funding PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGNS against data centers in America "Other nations are trying to get us to SLOW DOWN and they are spending a LOT of money on propaganda, on press PR, trying to convince everybody that this ISN'T a positive thing" "If we don't do this, we're going to be left behind." "These companies are spending TREMENDOUS amounts of money on the communities, the local communities. So I think it's important that we tell the local communities that..."
1:13

🚨 President Trump just confirmed CHINA is funding PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGNS against data centers in America "Other nations are trying to get us to SLOW DOWN and they are spending a LOT of money on propaganda, on press PR, trying to convince everybody that this ISN'T a positive thing" "If we don't do this, we're going to be left behind." "These companies are spending TREMENDOUS amounts of money on the communities, the local communities. So I think it's important that we tell the local communities that..."

Nick Sortor

387,035 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

HILARIOUS: Bill Maher: “You ever talk to a stripper about politics? It's awesome because they don't know what the right answer is supposed to be, and you know what? They come out very often more conservative. They're like, you know, why should I give my money? Why should that be going?… I’m like, you know, that's what conservatives say. ‘Oh, no. I'm a liberal.’ Yeah, you think you're a liberal, but you just don't know about anything. You don't know the issues.” “No taxes on tips. I'll vote for Trump tomorrow because that's the issue that's important to them. And you can't blame people for that. People are, we're all just trying to live our own lives and the issues that are important to [you].” “I think you’re on to something.”
0:57

HILARIOUS: Bill Maher: “You ever talk to a stripper about politics? It's awesome because they don't know what the right answer is supposed to be, and you know what? They come out very often more conservative. They're like, you know, why should I give my money? Why should that be going?… I’m like, you know, that's what conservatives say. ‘Oh, no. I'm a liberal.’ Yeah, you think you're a liberal, but you just don't know about anything. You don't know the issues.” “No taxes on tips. I'll vote for Trump tomorrow because that's the issue that's important to them. And you can't blame people for that. People are, we're all just trying to live our own lives and the issues that are important to [you].” “I think you’re on to something.”

RedWave Press

212,272 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Founders who never built companies pre-AI have at least one big advantage: they have fewer preconceived notions about how to build a company. This applies to how software should be built, when a product that people worked really hard on should get dissolved, what tools finance should use, how GTM should work, or really anything and everything else. "The culture is: you don't maximize for your function, you maximize for the company."
1:26

Founders who never built companies pre-AI have at least one big advantage: they have fewer preconceived notions about how to build a company. This applies to how software should be built, when a product that people worked really hard on should get dissolved, what tools finance should use, how GTM should work, or really anything and everything else. "The culture is: you don't maximize for your function, you maximize for the company."

Jack Altman

46,483 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Caroline Lucas, "The level of disgust and distrust in the population is like nothing I've ever seen before" "It's really dangerous and scary" "It's so important there is a voice out there offering hope and solutions and isn't afraid to say what it thinks" "Whatever you say about Zack, he's not afraid to say what he thinks" "That's great right now because the image people have of politicians is that they mould their language to what they think you want them to say" "I think there is just an appetite now for authentic politics" "And that's what the Green Party's about"
0:38

Caroline Lucas, "The level of disgust and distrust in the population is like nothing I've ever seen before" "It's really dangerous and scary" "It's so important there is a voice out there offering hope and solutions and isn't afraid to say what it thinks" "Whatever you say about Zack, he's not afraid to say what he thinks" "That's great right now because the image people have of politicians is that they mould their language to what they think you want them to say" "I think there is just an appetite now for authentic politics" "And that's what the Green Party's about"

Farrukh

42,783 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Most people think AI content is just "slop." I think it's the future of hyper-local media. Here's why: Traditional local news is dying because the economics don't work. Small markets can't support full newsroom teams. But what if you could serve every city with zero labor costs? I just built an AI automation that creates daily local news podcasts: → Automatically scrapes Google News and local event feeds → Generates professional scripts with emotion and pacing controls → Produces broadcast-quality audio using ElevenLabs V3 → Operates completely hands-free once deployed The result? A business model that wasn't economically viable before AI. No hosts. No editors. No research team. Just smart automation and a few API subscriptions. This isn't about flooding the internet with crappy AI content. It's about solving real problems - like news deserts in underserved markets. The system I built in hours could theoretically power thousands of hyper-local podcasts simultaneously. When you start thinking in terms of "what can I automate," entire industries now become accessible. Want me to send you the full system for you to clone for your small town or city? 1. Like & RT 2. Follow me (so I can dm you) 3. Comment "BLUEPRINT" below I'll send you the complete n8n template, all the prompting, and a full setup video that you can use to spin up your own local news podcast.
1:48

Most people think AI content is just "slop." I think it's the future of hyper-local media. Here's why: Traditional local news is dying because the economics don't work. Small markets can't support full newsroom teams. But what if you could serve every city with zero labor costs? I just built an AI automation that creates daily local news podcasts: → Automatically scrapes Google News and local event feeds → Generates professional scripts with emotion and pacing controls → Produces broadcast-quality audio using ElevenLabs V3 → Operates completely hands-free once deployed The result? A business model that wasn't economically viable before AI. No hosts. No editors. No research team. Just smart automation and a few API subscriptions. This isn't about flooding the internet with crappy AI content. It's about solving real problems - like news deserts in underserved markets. The system I built in hours could theoretically power thousands of hyper-local podcasts simultaneously. When you start thinking in terms of "what can I automate," entire industries now become accessible. Want me to send you the full system for you to clone for your small town or city? 1. Like & RT 2. Follow me (so I can dm you) 3. Comment "BLUEPRINT" below I'll send you the complete n8n template, all the prompting, and a full setup video that you can use to spin up your own local news podcast.

David Roberts

40,872 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce