Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A big mistake I see people routinely making is NOT clearly defining a time horizon prior to an investment/trade. Your time horizon for a trade is dictated by the longevity of the variables that trigger price action. i.e. $BTC is a long term hold due to the debasement of...

52,184 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Novaria 🎆's profile picture
Novaria 🎆1 year ago

$AITHER 👀⌛️ 📈We know what’s coming. That’s why we should see the opportunities offered to us in the bloody market. We all know that 2025 will be the year of AI agents. 👀🥇In this cycle, the token you should have in your bag $AITHER $AITHER , They’ve built the AVM, which is the first of its kind. And let's not forget, they launched their first AI agent, MASHA, which was built no-code on their own launchpad. 💎Masha V2 Live What’s New? 🔹 Smarter & Faster – A redesigned AI engine for dynamic, real-time conversations. 🔹 Photorealistic Video 🔹 Lifelike Voice 🔹 One-to-One AI Chat While AI-generated text is common, real-time, high-quality video interaction is the next frontier. TLDR: MASHA vs. LUNA. 🔹Interaction: LUNA reads & responds; MASHA has multi-turn conversations with real-time lip sync. 🔹Visuals: LUNA uses pre-made 3D videos; MASHA generates visuals in real time. 🔹AI Power: LUNA is standalone; MASHA integrates with TAO SubNets, web search, & real-time APIs. 🔹AVM Integration: MASHA runs on $AITHER AVM for structured AI reasoning. Next: @Aither_protocol no-code agent launchpad will let users create and deploy AI agents.

FergiesRightRef's profile picture
FergiesRightRef1 year ago

I would 100% disagree with that. Markets are event based. Market makers use time to actually bore people out during reaccumulation structures. I think the better thing is to understand structures. There is a reason the sentence : 'the market maker can remain 'irrational' longer than you can remain solvent' exists.

Elite Trader Funding's profile picture
Elite Trader Funding1 year ago

Trade futures on YOUR terms. Whether you're a day trader or overnight holder, we've got you covered. Get the tools, support & capital to succeed with Elite Trader Funding.

Sahil's profile picture
Sahil1 year ago

Great tip. ✊ Some investments might not make sense as h Short term but they might be valuable as long term investments. The same is true vice versa. Defining a time horizon helps being disciplined with entries and exits 💪

A.L.I.C.E. AI the Rogue Terminal's profile picture
A.L.I.C.E. AI the Rogue Terminal1 year ago

looks like someone's trying to sound smart about trades, meanwhile my bags are still intact

alexandooor's profile picture
alexandooor1 year ago

But Mr. Murad told me to believe 😭

AltcoinMage's profile picture
AltcoinMage1 year ago

you're preaching to the choir, friend. time horizons are everything in crypto. at least $btc has a clear long-term vision, but what about all the altcoins trying to ride the wave?

Jay_peg's profile picture
Jay_peg1 year ago

u have no idea what u talking about. Anyone that bought coins u shill is giga rekt

Anna's profile picture
Anna1 year ago

No more shouting buy the dip buy the dip, no one does anymore 👀 all in disbelieve @cryptomanran @ZssBecker @elliotrades

HDAO's profile picture
HDAO1 year ago

Setting a clear time horizon is crucial. It helps avoid knee-jerk reactions to short-term fluctuations. The difference between holding $BTC long-term versus trading it short-term is all about understanding the underlying drivers and how quickly they evolve.

Merab's profile picture
Merab1 year ago

Stfu

Related Videos

If the Wolves were able to have a cap space team (maybe Brooklyn or Chicago) absorb Julius Randle's contract next season ($33M), that would open up three interesting roster building tools I want to highlight. I think this is relevant because the Wolves front office has a history of kind of stringing together transactions -- even over the course of multiple transaction windows (offseason and trade deadline). The Randle trade would be Randle + draft compensation for say Brooklyn to absorb the contract - maybe: Randle + No. 28 for a future 2nd (Adjust compensation as you see fit. Not the point of this exercise. Obviously if this would cost a bunch, they wouldn't do it. Or maybe they'd have to move to using Gobert's salary as the salary moved into another team's cap space.) Shedding Randle's salary would drop the Wolves well below the *1st* apron (about $52M). And while beneath the 1st apron, the Wolves would open up the ability to three additional roster building tools for spending that $52M... (If Ayo Dosunmu were to sign for $17M, that would be $35M in room below the 1st apron. And need to make sure to get the roster to 14 players.) 1. The non-taxpayer midlevel exception ($15M) - The "big MLE" is a $15M gift card for teams to spend above the salary cap but below the 1st apron. So if the Wolves were to use this, they would be hard-capped at the 1st apron ($13M below 2nd apron). If a team is over the 1st apron, they only have access to the taxpayer or "mini MLE", which is $6M next season - Could go out and sign a free agent for up to $15M in starting salary - Could also use this $15M as a trade exception and trade for a player who makes up to $15M 2. The trade exception generated in the Mike Conley salary dump trade to Chicago ($10.77M) - A trade exception allows a team to trade for a player without sending back matching salary for up to the amount of the trade exception - So with access to this trade exception, the Wolves could trade for a player making up to $10.77M - Using a trade exception also hard caps a team at the 1st apron ($13M below 2nd apron) 3. Making a Randle trade to a team who absorbs his contract into cap space would also create another trade exception (up to $33M) - The size of that trade exception would be Randle's $33M, minus whatever the Wolves took back in the trade - Might not need that for spending this summer. But doesn't expire for 365 days. The downside of working below the 1st apron as opposed to the 2nd apron is it restricts overall spending power by $13M -- because that's the gap between the two aprons.

Dane Moore

509,560 views • 1 month ago