Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

“A bitcoin treasury company has access to leverage, perpetual preferred equity that has no margins, not callable, that is not as accessible to you as a fund, and so that carry trade itself can outperform bitcoin itself over the long run,” Strive CEO Matt Cole says.

Yahoo Finance

1,970,388 subscribers

38,139 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“We’re the only Bitcoin treasury company with 100% of our amplification through perpetual preferred equity.” In his conversation with Remy Blaire, Matt Cole breaks down why Strive structure eliminates margin-call risk, avoids forced liquidation, and allows the company to ride out any volatility as it builds long-term value through Bitcoin exposure.

“We’re the only Bitcoin treasury company with 100% of our amplification through perpetual preferred equity.” In his conversation with Remy Blaire, Matt Cole breaks down why Strive structure eliminates margin-call risk, avoids forced liquidation, and allows the company to ride out any volatility as it builds long-term value through Bitcoin exposure.

FINTECH.TV

70,701 views • 7 months ago

.Strive CEO Matt Cole says Bitcoin is the answer to the debt crisis

.Strive CEO Matt Cole says Bitcoin is the answer to the debt crisis

Bloomberg TV

30,151 views • 8 months ago

"One of our strongest held beliefs is that they're never going to stop printing money, that the debt crisis will not be fixed." Matt Cole Strive CEO Notes: • Strive manages $2B AUM across 13 ETFs • Matt's net worth in Bitcoin since 2016-2017 • 50% drawdowns expected as normal volatility • Preferred equity structure allows riding to $1 🎧 Check out the latest episode of Blockspace Podcast: Why Most Bitcoin Treasury Companies Are Struggling — and the One That's Getting It Right’ in partnership with Blockspace!

"One of our strongest held beliefs is that they're never going to stop printing money, that the debt crisis will not be fixed." Matt Cole Strive CEO Notes: • Strive manages $2B AUM across 13 ETFs • Matt's net worth in Bitcoin since 2016-2017 • 50% drawdowns expected as normal volatility • Preferred equity structure allows riding to $1 🎧 Check out the latest episode of Blockspace Podcast: Why Most Bitcoin Treasury Companies Are Struggling — and the One That's Getting It Right’ in partnership with Blockspace!

CoinDesk Podcast Network

13,205 views • 7 months ago

📹 WATCH: Matt Cole, CEO of Strive, unveils their plan to become a leading #Bitcoin treasury company—blending structured finance, activist investing, and capital innovation. Presented at Bitcoin For Corporations | Strategy World 2025:

📹 WATCH: Matt Cole, CEO of Strive, unveils their plan to become a leading #Bitcoin treasury company—blending structured finance, activist investing, and capital innovation. Presented at Bitcoin For Corporations | Strategy World 2025:

Bitcoin For Corporations

112,442 views • 1 year ago

WHY I AM BUYING STRIVE (ASST) In this video, I walk through my full investment thesis on Strive (ASST), a Bitcoin treasury company with one of the cleanest and most interesting capital structures in the market today. This is not a hype video. This is a long-duration, balance-sheet-driven compounding thesis. I break down: Why ASST’s lack of debt matters more than people realize How SATA (perpetual preferred equity) creates Bitcoin amplification without liquidation risk Why maintaining ~31% amplification dramatically changes long-term outcomes What happens to the common stock under 20%, 25%, and 30% Bitcoin CAGR scenarios How Bitcoin per share compounds quietly over time due to the structure itself What dilution, PIPE overhang, and ATMs actually mean in practice Under conservative assumptions, even the lowest modeled Bitcoin growth scenario produces extreme asymmetry over long time horizons. Higher CAGR scenarios push the equity into territory most investors psychologically struggle to model. No multiple expansion assumed. No debt leverage assumed. No heroic assumptions required. This video is about understanding how time, compounding, and capital structure interact, and why that combination can produce non-linear outcomes if Bitcoin continues to succeed. This is not financial advice. This is how I’m thinking about risk, asymmetry, and survival over the next 10 to 20 years:

WHY I AM BUYING STRIVE (ASST) In this video, I walk through my full investment thesis on Strive (ASST), a Bitcoin treasury company with one of the cleanest and most interesting capital structures in the market today. This is not a hype video. This is a long-duration, balance-sheet-driven compounding thesis. I break down: Why ASST’s lack of debt matters more than people realize How SATA (perpetual preferred equity) creates Bitcoin amplification without liquidation risk Why maintaining ~31% amplification dramatically changes long-term outcomes What happens to the common stock under 20%, 25%, and 30% Bitcoin CAGR scenarios How Bitcoin per share compounds quietly over time due to the structure itself What dilution, PIPE overhang, and ATMs actually mean in practice Under conservative assumptions, even the lowest modeled Bitcoin growth scenario produces extreme asymmetry over long time horizons. Higher CAGR scenarios push the equity into territory most investors psychologically struggle to model. No multiple expansion assumed. No debt leverage assumed. No heroic assumptions required. This video is about understanding how time, compounding, and capital structure interact, and why that combination can produce non-linear outcomes if Bitcoin continues to succeed. This is not financial advice. This is how I’m thinking about risk, asymmetry, and survival over the next 10 to 20 years:

Adam Livingston

42,851 views • 6 months ago

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

Alex 👽

21,091 views • 10 days ago

Strive CEO Matt Cole believes AI will cause over 50% turnover in the S&P 500 over the next 10-15 years. The S&P 500 of the future will likely include many Bitcoin Treasury Companies that today are using intelligent leverage and accretive dilution to grow war chests of Bitcoin to be in leading positions for the future.

Strive CEO Matt Cole believes AI will cause over 50% turnover in the S&P 500 over the next 10-15 years. The S&P 500 of the future will likely include many Bitcoin Treasury Companies that today are using intelligent leverage and accretive dilution to grow war chests of Bitcoin to be in leading positions for the future.

Strive Asset Management

20,497 views • 1 year ago

Jim Chanos admits bitcoin treasury companies will continue to emerge and proliferate as long as the corporate leverage trade remains profitable.

Jim Chanos admits bitcoin treasury companies will continue to emerge and proliferate as long as the corporate leverage trade remains profitable.

The ₿itcoin Therapist

126,172 views • 11 months ago

Making Sense Of Bitcoin Treasury Companies If you've been following me on X you’ll know that I have recently been floating a lot of my updated thoughts on the Bitcoin Treasury space. Here I have synthesised all of my ideas and distilled them into a single video. If you prefer YouTube, you can find the link in the comments. If you prefer written format, continue reading. The first thing we need to do is acknowledge an important fact which is that Strategy, as a Bitcoin Treasury Company, is an anomaly. What do I mean by that? Strategy’s success has been defined by a number of unique factors and circumstances, most of which cannot be replicated again by other Bitcoin Treasury Companies. Specifically, there are 6 things that stand out to me. 1. Before adopting Bitcoin, Strategy was a billion dollar company with an operating business that was generating roughly $50M in cash a year. 2. Until the introduction of the ETF's in January 2024, Strategy was the only way for the average investor to gain passive exposure to Bitcoin. 3. Until this year, Strategy was the only way for the average investor to gain leveraged exposure to Bitcoin. 4. Strategy was issuing multiple, billion dollar, zero coupon, unsecured convertible notes at +50% conversion premiums. 5. Strategy has Michael Saylor, who, you don’t need me to tell you, is in a league of his own. 6. For many reasons, including those I’ve just mentioned, Strategy has benefitted disproportionately from the broader sentiment around Bitcoin. In other words, for the best part of 4 years, Strategy had zero competition for either capital or attention. As a result, it became a magnet for capital from anyone who wanted exposure to Bitcoin and it attracted inflows that were beyond what fundamentals alone would maybe justify. Therefore, using Strategy as a blueprint for the performance that you can expect from other Bitcoin Treasury Companies is a bad idea. Using Strategy as a blueprint for how to operate a Bitcoin Treasury Company is a good idea. Now let’s break down what’s unfolded over the last 6 months or so. Between May and June of this year, when we witnessed a flood of new Bitcoin Treasury Companies, we entered what I refer to as the frenzy phase. The frenzy phase was driven almost entirely by sentiment. By sentiment I simply mean emotion. Since then, as sentiment has slowly faded, the market has increasingly priced Bitcoin Treasury Companies based more on fundamentals. By fundamentals I simply mean facts. So where as sentiment is driven by emotion and hype, fundamentals are driven by facts and reason. The problem is that when you price Bitcoin Treasury Companies on fundamentals, you realise that many of them are almost entirely dependent on sentiment in order to expand mNAV so they can raise capital via the common stock ATM to buy Bitcoin and generate Bitcoin Yield. However, for me, raising capital via the common stock ATM and recycling it into Bitcoin is not genuine value creation — it’s value transfer. That’s not to say you shouldn’t leverage the ATM as and when necessary — you should. However, if your business model as a Bitcoin Treasury Company no longer works when “sentiment is low” then you have neither a business model nor a business. You’re the equivalent of a meme stock except with Bitcoin on your balance sheet. On that basis, companies shouldn’t expect to trade at a premium if the common stock ATM is the only way they raise capital. I’m not saying they won’t trade at a premium — I’m saying that companies shouldn’t expect to. Now, between July and now, we’ve obviously seen mNAVs compress substantially and so the frenzy phase is over which means that the days of automatically being granted generous mNAV multiples is also over. So now we are in the maturity phase. The maturity phase is going to be defined by being able to offer a differentiated value proposition and having a sustainable business model that can generate Bitcoin Yield in any environment independent of sentiment. In other words, they can generate Bitcoin Yield when trading at or below 1 mNAV. So essentially now, Bitcoin Treasury Companies have to work for their mNAV multiples — as it should be. Following the maturity phase will be the consolidation phase where capital, Bitcoin and ultimately market share will converge towards a small number of Bitcoin Treasury Companies that will dominate the entire industry. I should clarify that I am referring predominantly to pure-play Bitcoin Treasury Companies — companies who are valued based solely on their Bitcoin strategy. Now, with everything that I’ve said, how should you evaluate Bitcoin Treasury Companies? Hopefully over the next few weeks I’m going to string together a video with my valuation framework. In the meantime, a basic test is that I use is this: How much Bitcoin Yield can the company generate over X period of time — you decide what that period of time is — if it traded at 1x mNAV over that entire period? If the answer is 0, then they are probably entirely dependent on raising capital via the common stock ATM which means they likely don’t deserve a premium. If the answer is >0, then they are probably innovating through the use of other instruments — like converts and preferred products — which means they likely do deserve a premium and so whatever number you come up with should be used as the base for your valuation. Now, don’t be fooled. The Bitcoin Treasury Company space is, not entirely, but to a large degree, a zero-sum game. Every Dollar raised by one Bitcoin Treasury Company is at the expense of every other Bitcoin Treasury Company. Every Bitcoin purchased by one Bitcoin Treasury Company is at the expense of every other Bitcoin Treasury Company. It’s only because we are early that everyone is incentivised to essentially hold hands and cheer each other on. However, make no mistake, everyone involved is tacitly well aware that they are all competing for the same finite amount of capital and the same fixed amount of Bitcoin. Thus, the reality is that, by definition, not every Bitcoin Treasury Company is going to succeed. So choose your horses and jockeys wisely. As a side note, with the amount of Bitcoin Treasury Companies now desperately chasing and competing for the same capital from institutions, who do you think has the leverage; the Bitcoin Treasury Companies or the institutions? I’ll let you decide. Before I close, I want to leave you guys with this. There is a small subset of people invested in Bitcoin Treasury Companies who are desperately clinging on to their bags because they believe “sentiment will return.” These people are completely missing the point. My friends, if your investing philosophy is based on sentiment, you are simply not going to last. You want to base your decisions, as far as possible, on fundamentals. As investors, you either adapt and update your mental models based on how things are and not how you want them to be — or you get left behind. With that in mind: Never get caught up in tribalism. Never get attached to your beliefs. Always think critically. Always think independently. Always seek Truth.

Making Sense Of Bitcoin Treasury Companies If you've been following me on X you’ll know that I have recently been floating a lot of my updated thoughts on the Bitcoin Treasury space. Here I have synthesised all of my ideas and distilled them into a single video. If you prefer YouTube, you can find the link in the comments. If you prefer written format, continue reading. The first thing we need to do is acknowledge an important fact which is that Strategy, as a Bitcoin Treasury Company, is an anomaly. What do I mean by that? Strategy’s success has been defined by a number of unique factors and circumstances, most of which cannot be replicated again by other Bitcoin Treasury Companies. Specifically, there are 6 things that stand out to me. 1. Before adopting Bitcoin, Strategy was a billion dollar company with an operating business that was generating roughly $50M in cash a year. 2. Until the introduction of the ETF's in January 2024, Strategy was the only way for the average investor to gain passive exposure to Bitcoin. 3. Until this year, Strategy was the only way for the average investor to gain leveraged exposure to Bitcoin. 4. Strategy was issuing multiple, billion dollar, zero coupon, unsecured convertible notes at +50% conversion premiums. 5. Strategy has Michael Saylor, who, you don’t need me to tell you, is in a league of his own. 6. For many reasons, including those I’ve just mentioned, Strategy has benefitted disproportionately from the broader sentiment around Bitcoin. In other words, for the best part of 4 years, Strategy had zero competition for either capital or attention. As a result, it became a magnet for capital from anyone who wanted exposure to Bitcoin and it attracted inflows that were beyond what fundamentals alone would maybe justify. Therefore, using Strategy as a blueprint for the performance that you can expect from other Bitcoin Treasury Companies is a bad idea. Using Strategy as a blueprint for how to operate a Bitcoin Treasury Company is a good idea. Now let’s break down what’s unfolded over the last 6 months or so. Between May and June of this year, when we witnessed a flood of new Bitcoin Treasury Companies, we entered what I refer to as the frenzy phase. The frenzy phase was driven almost entirely by sentiment. By sentiment I simply mean emotion. Since then, as sentiment has slowly faded, the market has increasingly priced Bitcoin Treasury Companies based more on fundamentals. By fundamentals I simply mean facts. So where as sentiment is driven by emotion and hype, fundamentals are driven by facts and reason. The problem is that when you price Bitcoin Treasury Companies on fundamentals, you realise that many of them are almost entirely dependent on sentiment in order to expand mNAV so they can raise capital via the common stock ATM to buy Bitcoin and generate Bitcoin Yield. However, for me, raising capital via the common stock ATM and recycling it into Bitcoin is not genuine value creation — it’s value transfer. That’s not to say you shouldn’t leverage the ATM as and when necessary — you should. However, if your business model as a Bitcoin Treasury Company no longer works when “sentiment is low” then you have neither a business model nor a business. You’re the equivalent of a meme stock except with Bitcoin on your balance sheet. On that basis, companies shouldn’t expect to trade at a premium if the common stock ATM is the only way they raise capital. I’m not saying they won’t trade at a premium — I’m saying that companies shouldn’t expect to. Now, between July and now, we’ve obviously seen mNAVs compress substantially and so the frenzy phase is over which means that the days of automatically being granted generous mNAV multiples is also over. So now we are in the maturity phase. The maturity phase is going to be defined by being able to offer a differentiated value proposition and having a sustainable business model that can generate Bitcoin Yield in any environment independent of sentiment. In other words, they can generate Bitcoin Yield when trading at or below 1 mNAV. So essentially now, Bitcoin Treasury Companies have to work for their mNAV multiples — as it should be. Following the maturity phase will be the consolidation phase where capital, Bitcoin and ultimately market share will converge towards a small number of Bitcoin Treasury Companies that will dominate the entire industry. I should clarify that I am referring predominantly to pure-play Bitcoin Treasury Companies — companies who are valued based solely on their Bitcoin strategy. Now, with everything that I’ve said, how should you evaluate Bitcoin Treasury Companies? Hopefully over the next few weeks I’m going to string together a video with my valuation framework. In the meantime, a basic test is that I use is this: How much Bitcoin Yield can the company generate over X period of time — you decide what that period of time is — if it traded at 1x mNAV over that entire period? If the answer is 0, then they are probably entirely dependent on raising capital via the common stock ATM which means they likely don’t deserve a premium. If the answer is >0, then they are probably innovating through the use of other instruments — like converts and preferred products — which means they likely do deserve a premium and so whatever number you come up with should be used as the base for your valuation. Now, don’t be fooled. The Bitcoin Treasury Company space is, not entirely, but to a large degree, a zero-sum game. Every Dollar raised by one Bitcoin Treasury Company is at the expense of every other Bitcoin Treasury Company. Every Bitcoin purchased by one Bitcoin Treasury Company is at the expense of every other Bitcoin Treasury Company. It’s only because we are early that everyone is incentivised to essentially hold hands and cheer each other on. However, make no mistake, everyone involved is tacitly well aware that they are all competing for the same finite amount of capital and the same fixed amount of Bitcoin. Thus, the reality is that, by definition, not every Bitcoin Treasury Company is going to succeed. So choose your horses and jockeys wisely. As a side note, with the amount of Bitcoin Treasury Companies now desperately chasing and competing for the same capital from institutions, who do you think has the leverage; the Bitcoin Treasury Companies or the institutions? I’ll let you decide. Before I close, I want to leave you guys with this. There is a small subset of people invested in Bitcoin Treasury Companies who are desperately clinging on to their bags because they believe “sentiment will return.” These people are completely missing the point. My friends, if your investing philosophy is based on sentiment, you are simply not going to last. You want to base your decisions, as far as possible, on fundamentals. As investors, you either adapt and update your mental models based on how things are and not how you want them to be — or you get left behind. With that in mind: Never get caught up in tribalism. Never get attached to your beliefs. Always think critically. Always think independently. Always seek Truth.

Chris Millas

34,483 views • 8 months ago

🔥STRIVE ACQUIRES SEMLER - THE NEW ERA OF BITCOIN TREASURY COMPANIES🔥 Strive ($ASST) just swallowed Semler Scientific ($SMLR) using freshly minted shares as bait, walked away with a mountain of cheap Bitcoin, and left Wall Street clutching its pearls. Watch as the deal math unpacks itself, showing how you can turn equity dilution into a BITCOIN HOARDING SPREE. This is the acquisition arbitrage era, where NAV gaps get strip-mined, diagnostics labs morph into coin vaults, and every undervalued treasury company feels the cold breath of an all-stock predator.

🔥STRIVE ACQUIRES SEMLER - THE NEW ERA OF BITCOIN TREASURY COMPANIES🔥 Strive ($ASST) just swallowed Semler Scientific ($SMLR) using freshly minted shares as bait, walked away with a mountain of cheap Bitcoin, and left Wall Street clutching its pearls. Watch as the deal math unpacks itself, showing how you can turn equity dilution into a BITCOIN HOARDING SPREE. This is the acquisition arbitrage era, where NAV gaps get strip-mined, diagnostics labs morph into coin vaults, and every undervalued treasury company feels the cold breath of an all-stock predator.

Adam Livingston

54,332 views • 9 months ago

"Bitcoin is not digital gold," Richard Bernstein Advisors' Rich Bernstein says. "We should put that story to rest." He adds: "Gold is a defensive asset that has a high correlation to uncertainty, [and] bitcoin is a very aggressive asset that has a high correlation to liquidity."

"Bitcoin is not digital gold," Richard Bernstein Advisors' Rich Bernstein says. "We should put that story to rest." He adds: "Gold is a defensive asset that has a high correlation to uncertainty, [and] bitcoin is a very aggressive asset that has a high correlation to liquidity."

Yahoo Finance

25,167 views • 4 months ago

NEW: Adam Back says, “Ultimately, every company becomes a Bitcoin company.” “If your fund has no chance of keeping up with Bitcoin, you should close it down and start a Bitcoin fund.”

NEW: Adam Back says, “Ultimately, every company becomes a Bitcoin company.” “If your fund has no chance of keeping up with Bitcoin, you should close it down and start a Bitcoin fund.”

Simply Bitcoin

21,174 views • 7 months ago

"The road to hell is paved with carry. People believe it's safe, get greedy, and try to add to that yield with leverage. It works until it doesn't" "Matt Cole, the CEO of Strive, said this was basically the worst day in the history of digital credit" "He said it's a leverage liquidation event, not a credit event"

"The road to hell is paved with carry. People believe it's safe, get greedy, and try to add to that yield with leverage. It works until it doesn't" "Matt Cole, the CEO of Strive, said this was basically the worst day in the history of digital credit" "He said it's a leverage liquidation event, not a credit event"

The Wolf Of All Streets

36,154 views • 18 days ago

MICHAEL SAYLOR: NEVER SELL YOUR BITCOIN IS ADVICE FOR PLEBS, NOT FOR STRATEGY. “I GOT VERY VERY FAMOUS FOR SAYING YOU DO NOT SELL YOUR BITCOIN TO THE PLEBS… THAT IS NOT THE WAY YOU WOULD RUN A BITCOIN FINANCE COMPANY”

MICHAEL SAYLOR: NEVER SELL YOUR BITCOIN IS ADVICE FOR PLEBS, NOT FOR STRATEGY. “I GOT VERY VERY FAMOUS FOR SAYING YOU DO NOT SELL YOUR BITCOIN TO THE PLEBS… THAT IS NOT THE WAY YOU WOULD RUN A BITCOIN FINANCE COMPANY”

Vivek Sen

32,306 views • 21 days ago

Welcome back to The Hurdle Rate. Episode 45: Preferred Equity Demand The crew is back to discuss preferred equity and potential systemic risk to Bitcoin, the Strive + Semler M&A transaction being the first in Bitcoin treasuries, the IBIT Bitcoin covered call ETF, gold and silver price action, what Japan is saying to the world right now, and Bitcoin in an action-packed 2026. Here's the latest with Tim Kotzman, Matt Cole, Jeff Walton and Ben Werkman 0:30 - Welcome Back to The Hurdle Rate 1:10 - Does the Preferred Equity Present a Systemic Risk to Bitcoin? 22:12 - Strive + Semler: The First M&A Transaction in Bitcoin Treasuries 34:00 - IBIT Bitcoin Covered Call ETF 42:21 - Gold & Silver Price Action 48:00 - What is Japan Saying to the World Right Now? 59:24 - Bitcoin in an Action-Packed 2026

Welcome back to The Hurdle Rate. Episode 45: Preferred Equity Demand The crew is back to discuss preferred equity and potential systemic risk to Bitcoin, the Strive + Semler M&A transaction being the first in Bitcoin treasuries, the IBIT Bitcoin covered call ETF, gold and silver price action, what Japan is saying to the world right now, and Bitcoin in an action-packed 2026. Here's the latest with Tim Kotzman, Matt Cole, Jeff Walton and Ben Werkman 0:30 - Welcome Back to The Hurdle Rate 1:10 - Does the Preferred Equity Present a Systemic Risk to Bitcoin? 22:12 - Strive + Semler: The First M&A Transaction in Bitcoin Treasuries 34:00 - IBIT Bitcoin Covered Call ETF 42:21 - Gold & Silver Price Action 48:00 - What is Japan Saying to the World Right Now? 59:24 - Bitcoin in an Action-Packed 2026

The Hurdle Rate Podcast

211,091 views • 5 months ago

🇷🇺🇮🇷 Putin says Russia has no evidence that Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons. He offered to store the uranium and positioned itself as the country that can resolve what Washington has spent months treating as an existential threat.

🇷🇺🇮🇷 Putin says Russia has no evidence that Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons. He offered to store the uranium and positioned itself as the country that can resolve what Washington has spent months treating as an existential threat.

Mario Nawfal

88,142 views • 1 month ago

JUST IN: BlackRock CEO says, “There are a number of sovereign funds that are buying” their #Bitcoin ETF incrementally. “You own it over years. This is not a trade.”

JUST IN: BlackRock CEO says, “There are a number of sovereign funds that are buying” their #Bitcoin ETF incrementally. “You own it over years. This is not a trade.”

Bitcoin Magazine

108,096 views • 7 months ago