正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

A BOMBSHELL DISCOVERY - THIS,,, THIS IS WHAT REALLY KILLED CHARLIE KIRK ! It was not a bullet of any kind, as many of my past videos have demonstrated already. But here is the unambiguous signature of what actually did kill him. > > > It is an unmistakable...

US_did_911's profile picture

US_did_ 911

1,803 subscribers

95,201 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Well, not everything was fake. The bullet wound was, and the blood event surely was. But not the electric current sent through the microphone. That is what killed Charlie. It was like a magician's sly of hand, who does one thing with one hand, to distract everyone's attention, while doing his trick with the other hand. And there were a lot of other actors involved too. You can see two of the actors in the last 4th video. But actors, or not, Charlie is still dead. So, we still need to get to the bottom of this.
4:35

Well, not everything was fake. The bullet wound was, and the blood event surely was. But not the electric current sent through the microphone. That is what killed Charlie. It was like a magician's sly of hand, who does one thing with one hand, to distract everyone's attention, while doing his trick with the other hand. And there were a lot of other actors involved too. You can see two of the actors in the last 4th video. But actors, or not, Charlie is still dead. So, we still need to get to the bottom of this.

US_did_ 911

189,085 次观看 • 8 个月前

Your observations are almost correct, but your conclusions are not. What you see flying out, as what others thought was his ear piece, is not his ear piece. It is his chain he had around his neck, with, what I am pretty certain, a cross on it, which all Christians would wear, if they have a chain on their necks. So, what apparently happened, which seems so astronomically unlikely, is the bullet did not hit him in the neck first, but hit him in the chest, and to be more specific in that cross. So, after a hit into that cross, his chain snaps, and it is that which you see flying out backwards. When the chain snaps, and starts flying up and backwards, it also pulls up the front edge of is shirt, in less than 0.1 sec. So, that is how that anomaly is explained at the same time. What happens next, is his mic had a wire under his shirt. It kind of just laid in the back of his neck, going around his shoulder, and disappearing under his shirt on the front. That wire must have had some contact with this chain, or even being wrapped around it like may be just one turn. So, when that chain snaps and starts flying backwards, it starts pulling on his mic at the same time. Just the mic had a wire that was most certainly lose a little bit. So, that is why that responds with a few tens of a second delay. But still, the mic also, after jerking around for a few tens of a second disappears completely of his shirt. So, basically, the bullet hits his cross first, which is on his chain, would explain all of these anomalies at the same time, including the wire on the back of his neck being pulled around from the front, and thus bulging his shirt in the back a little bit. If you pay all of this is slow motion, you will see that it all gets seqeuenced correctly. And the last thing to note, is after hitting his cross, and getting deflected, the bullet now would start going up, instead of forward, and would go up into his neck from the bottom up, and disappear into his head. That would also explain at the same time why there is no exit wound. Because his skull would stop the bullet from exiting. One side note, not related to all of these anomalies, but still a necessary thing to keep in mind - that alleged high velocity bullet Mauser 30_06, could not have possibly be the weapon used, as that bullet would have taken one third of his neck out. For everything to be explained correctly, no Mauser, or any other kind of shotgun could have been used. Another, much smaller caliber weapon had to be used, like some kind of a hand gun, and from a much closer distance too, as a hand gun without the scope, from a far way roof would just not work. And so, that is how all of this happened. I know this was long. But this is one bizarre, super difficult to crack episode. So, I could not make it any shorter.
0:30

Your observations are almost correct, but your conclusions are not. What you see flying out, as what others thought was his ear piece, is not his ear piece. It is his chain he had around his neck, with, what I am pretty certain, a cross on it, which all Christians would wear, if they have a chain on their necks. So, what apparently happened, which seems so astronomically unlikely, is the bullet did not hit him in the neck first, but hit him in the chest, and to be more specific in that cross. So, after a hit into that cross, his chain snaps, and it is that which you see flying out backwards. When the chain snaps, and starts flying up and backwards, it also pulls up the front edge of is shirt, in less than 0.1 sec. So, that is how that anomaly is explained at the same time. What happens next, is his mic had a wire under his shirt. It kind of just laid in the back of his neck, going around his shoulder, and disappearing under his shirt on the front. That wire must have had some contact with this chain, or even being wrapped around it like may be just one turn. So, when that chain snaps and starts flying backwards, it starts pulling on his mic at the same time. Just the mic had a wire that was most certainly lose a little bit. So, that is why that responds with a few tens of a second delay. But still, the mic also, after jerking around for a few tens of a second disappears completely of his shirt. So, basically, the bullet hits his cross first, which is on his chain, would explain all of these anomalies at the same time, including the wire on the back of his neck being pulled around from the front, and thus bulging his shirt in the back a little bit. If you pay all of this is slow motion, you will see that it all gets seqeuenced correctly. And the last thing to note, is after hitting his cross, and getting deflected, the bullet now would start going up, instead of forward, and would go up into his neck from the bottom up, and disappear into his head. That would also explain at the same time why there is no exit wound. Because his skull would stop the bullet from exiting. One side note, not related to all of these anomalies, but still a necessary thing to keep in mind - that alleged high velocity bullet Mauser 30_06, could not have possibly be the weapon used, as that bullet would have taken one third of his neck out. For everything to be explained correctly, no Mauser, or any other kind of shotgun could have been used. Another, much smaller caliber weapon had to be used, like some kind of a hand gun, and from a much closer distance too, as a hand gun without the scope, from a far way roof would just not work. And so, that is how all of this happened. I know this was long. But this is one bizarre, super difficult to crack episode. So, I could not make it any shorter.

US_did_ 911

31,087 次观看 • 11 个月前

Yes, Ricky was surely the culprit. But only in pushing the button. HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PALM PISTOL IN HIS HAND ! > 1. Nothing is visible between the fingers, but the shadow on the frames 0, or +1 ; > 2. Cutler's hand is half way open, with all fingers positioned forward. Nothing can be held in the open hand position like that. Especially when the hand is in motion. If anything was in that hand, it would simply fall out ; > 3. Most certainly, no weapon can be aimed at the target in this kind of open hand position, even if something could have been in it. Any weapon has to be held with a firm grip, for it to be aimed properly. Any suggesting that a weapon can be aimed form such a completely open hand position is utterly laughable ; > 4. No squeezing action in the hand is visible at all. All fingers remain perfectly stationary ; > > > 5. NO RECOIL action on the hand whatsoever ! Anyone who knows anything about the basic laws of physics, would know that no weapon is ever fired without a recoil action. Even the knowledge of the laws of physics is not required for this understanding. Just the basic common sense should be sufficient. Any one of the points above mentioned makes this palm pistol option impossible. Let alone all of them at the same time. And this evidence is with regards to the hand only. If I were to make the whole list of evidence against the palm pistol, aside of the actual hand itself, it would probably be 30-40 items long. So, I will skip that pages long extended part. I hope that just the above stated is sufficient enough ? But the full length video, with all the frames, each frame by frame examination is coming right up.
0:24

Yes, Ricky was surely the culprit. But only in pushing the button. HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PALM PISTOL IN HIS HAND ! > 1. Nothing is visible between the fingers, but the shadow on the frames 0, or +1 ; > 2. Cutler's hand is half way open, with all fingers positioned forward. Nothing can be held in the open hand position like that. Especially when the hand is in motion. If anything was in that hand, it would simply fall out ; > 3. Most certainly, no weapon can be aimed at the target in this kind of open hand position, even if something could have been in it. Any weapon has to be held with a firm grip, for it to be aimed properly. Any suggesting that a weapon can be aimed form such a completely open hand position is utterly laughable ; > 4. No squeezing action in the hand is visible at all. All fingers remain perfectly stationary ; > > > 5. NO RECOIL action on the hand whatsoever ! Anyone who knows anything about the basic laws of physics, would know that no weapon is ever fired without a recoil action. Even the knowledge of the laws of physics is not required for this understanding. Just the basic common sense should be sufficient. Any one of the points above mentioned makes this palm pistol option impossible. Let alone all of them at the same time. And this evidence is with regards to the hand only. If I were to make the whole list of evidence against the palm pistol, aside of the actual hand itself, it would probably be 30-40 items long. So, I will skip that pages long extended part. I hope that just the above stated is sufficient enough ? But the full length video, with all the frames, each frame by frame examination is coming right up.

US_did_ 911

143,561 次观看 • 5 个月前

Charlie Kirk's impossible neck position, as he gets carried away from the scene. It is kind of hard to see on this image. I did my best pointing out with two dots the back and the front of his head. It looks like his head position is just about parallel with his shoulders. I am not sure how many men can have their head in this kind of normal resting position, or even in their stretched position ? Maybe ladies can ? I do not know. But men, I do not think so. I surely can not do this even close. If any of you guys can do this, please mention it in the comments. But it does look to me like his neck, at this moment, is broken ? And for those, who do not have a background to this claim, I am attaching a video that hints to how his neck could have been broken, upon his hard body slam from about 4-5 height.
1:48

Charlie Kirk's impossible neck position, as he gets carried away from the scene. It is kind of hard to see on this image. I did my best pointing out with two dots the back and the front of his head. It looks like his head position is just about parallel with his shoulders. I am not sure how many men can have their head in this kind of normal resting position, or even in their stretched position ? Maybe ladies can ? I do not know. But men, I do not think so. I surely can not do this even close. If any of you guys can do this, please mention it in the comments. But it does look to me like his neck, at this moment, is broken ? And for those, who do not have a background to this claim, I am attaching a video that hints to how his neck could have been broken, upon his hard body slam from about 4-5 height.

US_did_ 911

22,374 次观看 • 6 个月前

Forget everything what it says. It is all BS. Just check out the thumb of his right hand. Nobody can tell me that this is not weird. This guy is clearly not in control of his extremities. I made a cutout of the video and increased speed. Parkinson much?
0:11

Forget everything what it says. It is all BS. Just check out the thumb of his right hand. Nobody can tell me that this is not weird. This guy is clearly not in control of his extremities. I made a cutout of the video and increased speed. Parkinson much?

(((Tendar)))

665,029 次观看 • 3 年前

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI
0:33

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI

Zlatti71

90,969 次观看 • 11 个月前

My take: the ball hitting a hand is not always a handball offence. You have to either 1.) deliberately touch the ball with your hand, or 2.) ball hits your hand/arm when it's made your body unnaturally bigger. This isn't deliberate, and if the ball hits his hand - which is on his forehead in the middle of a normal footballing challenge - he hasn't made his body unnaturally bigger. Because the ball would have hit his head anyway, so his hand on his head does not make his body unnaturally bigger. Furthermore, VAR can only recommend an on-field review for a clear and obvious error. There is only one camera angle available, which does not show that the referee has missed a clear and obvious error. We can't see clearly where the ball hits. This is categorically not what VAR was brought in for, and it all needs ripped up in the summer. This is a really poor look for Scottish football, as you can see from the international condemnation online since the game. You really have to feel for Hearts. Unless you're a Celtic fan of course, that must have been class. But if you're not a Celtic fan. Deary me. Could be a generation defining decision, never mind season defining!
0:25

My take: the ball hitting a hand is not always a handball offence. You have to either 1.) deliberately touch the ball with your hand, or 2.) ball hits your hand/arm when it's made your body unnaturally bigger. This isn't deliberate, and if the ball hits his hand - which is on his forehead in the middle of a normal footballing challenge - he hasn't made his body unnaturally bigger. Because the ball would have hit his head anyway, so his hand on his head does not make his body unnaturally bigger. Furthermore, VAR can only recommend an on-field review for a clear and obvious error. There is only one camera angle available, which does not show that the referee has missed a clear and obvious error. We can't see clearly where the ball hits. This is categorically not what VAR was brought in for, and it all needs ripped up in the summer. This is a really poor look for Scottish football, as you can see from the international condemnation online since the game. You really have to feel for Hearts. Unless you're a Celtic fan of course, that must have been class. But if you're not a Celtic fan. Deary me. Could be a generation defining decision, never mind season defining!

Scotland’s Coefficient

420,683 次观看 • 3 个月前

Tucker Carlson is accusing President Trump of rejecting Christianity and the Bible and says it all started with him not placing his hand on the Bible when he was sworn in as President of the United States. He said he witnessed this happen and that it should have been a red flag as to what was to come, and it has been bothering him since. “Why wouldn’t you put your hand on the Bible?” “You are not God; you cannot assume His powers.”
2:20

Tucker Carlson is accusing President Trump of rejecting Christianity and the Bible and says it all started with him not placing his hand on the Bible when he was sworn in as President of the United States. He said he witnessed this happen and that it should have been a red flag as to what was to come, and it has been bothering him since. “Why wouldn’t you put your hand on the Bible?” “You are not God; you cannot assume His powers.”

Shadow of Ezra

287,343 次观看 • 4 个月前

#MyHeroAcadamia This is what it was all leading up to. Deku’s “I Am Here” moment not being a scene of triumph, but one of true compassion is what makes him so special as a hero, and a human being An amazing, emotional subversion on all fronts
2:25

#MyHeroAcadamia This is what it was all leading up to. Deku’s “I Am Here” moment not being a scene of triumph, but one of true compassion is what makes him so special as a hero, and a human being An amazing, emotional subversion on all fronts

ZheroG (+1 Edition 🎮)

100,115 次观看 • 9 个月前

I want to try to explain why the video below says more about the last 2 days than any other you might see: This is Jeffree Star. A VERY popular content creator. You may not know him. But your kids do. His message about Charlie Kirk is not unique. But the catch is that he has millions of followers and likely the vast majority of them are Left. This is what it looks like to take a risk and stand on principle. This is not someone preaching to the choir. This is someone saying what is right at the risk of losing half his base. This took courage. I have said it since it happened… the Left does not know what has just turned. Yes. You’re sad and upset over Charlie. But many do not know how far his reach actually was. God bless you, Jeffree Star for the courage.
1:58

I want to try to explain why the video below says more about the last 2 days than any other you might see: This is Jeffree Star. A VERY popular content creator. You may not know him. But your kids do. His message about Charlie Kirk is not unique. But the catch is that he has millions of followers and likely the vast majority of them are Left. This is what it looks like to take a risk and stand on principle. This is not someone preaching to the choir. This is someone saying what is right at the risk of losing half his base. This took courage. I have said it since it happened… the Left does not know what has just turned. Yes. You’re sad and upset over Charlie. But many do not know how far his reach actually was. God bless you, Jeffree Star for the courage.

Tandy

2,272,964 次观看 • 11 个月前

ENIGMA OF CHARLIE CLOSING HIS EYES 6 FRAMES PRIOR TO THE BANG. And nobody ever addressed it,,,, not even until this very day. Speaking of some serious investigation we have here. 🙃 > And that enigma was toppled with his most remarkable last word he spoke on Earth - 'violence' ! All of those magical coincidences, right ? Nothing worth discussing, or looking into. Just another 'magic bullet', or magic something, whatever. Just move on, nothing to see here. I heard suggestions that he just closed his eyes for relaxation, as some people actually do indeed. But that only happens while listening to some long rant, or a discourse. Nobody ever does this in the middle of the back and fourth intense exchange, especially with a split second precision before the bang. And on top of that, this should be added. Charlie was replying to Hunter's question with a question of his own - 'counting, or not counting gang violence'. And how did Hunter reply in return - 'GREAT' ! How in the world does that reply fit into their conversation ? It almost looks like they both were trying to beat some internal countdown clock to something, and Charlie's response was super, unreasonably quick, like from a machine gun firing. And Hunter got stunned with the lack of time for his proper response, and muttered that meaningless, and totally out of context 'great'. That is what that last few words of exchange appeared like to me. Like they both were in some internal countdown clock to something. And Charlie closing his eyes only fits perfectly into that anomaly. But be it my assessment of that situation correct or not, is not it at least worth consideration and discussion ? Or that is just another coincidence ? A whole three of them in the span of a second, and not just any random second, but the very last second. Nothing to see here, right ? 🙃 Anyone cares to start addressing this, or we are just going to continue having a clown show here ? P.S. I am not suggesting here that CK is still alive. Many do believe that. I am NOT in that camp of believers. I wanted to clarify that position, as many often misread my insinuation. ..................................... Baron Coleman Baron, I think you are the only who considers all aspects of this investigation without bias, or concerns for the outcome. Everybody else that I know off do not discuss any aspect that does not fit into their already preconceived theory. That of course, would be covering all the aspects that you are aware of, with plenty of them that you definitely missed. I am pretty sure you have missed this one also. So, maybe you would care to address it ?
1:11

ENIGMA OF CHARLIE CLOSING HIS EYES 6 FRAMES PRIOR TO THE BANG. And nobody ever addressed it,,,, not even until this very day. Speaking of some serious investigation we have here. 🙃 > And that enigma was toppled with his most remarkable last word he spoke on Earth - 'violence' ! All of those magical coincidences, right ? Nothing worth discussing, or looking into. Just another 'magic bullet', or magic something, whatever. Just move on, nothing to see here. I heard suggestions that he just closed his eyes for relaxation, as some people actually do indeed. But that only happens while listening to some long rant, or a discourse. Nobody ever does this in the middle of the back and fourth intense exchange, especially with a split second precision before the bang. And on top of that, this should be added. Charlie was replying to Hunter's question with a question of his own - 'counting, or not counting gang violence'. And how did Hunter reply in return - 'GREAT' ! How in the world does that reply fit into their conversation ? It almost looks like they both were trying to beat some internal countdown clock to something, and Charlie's response was super, unreasonably quick, like from a machine gun firing. And Hunter got stunned with the lack of time for his proper response, and muttered that meaningless, and totally out of context 'great'. That is what that last few words of exchange appeared like to me. Like they both were in some internal countdown clock to something. And Charlie closing his eyes only fits perfectly into that anomaly. But be it my assessment of that situation correct or not, is not it at least worth consideration and discussion ? Or that is just another coincidence ? A whole three of them in the span of a second, and not just any random second, but the very last second. Nothing to see here, right ? 🙃 Anyone cares to start addressing this, or we are just going to continue having a clown show here ? P.S. I am not suggesting here that CK is still alive. Many do believe that. I am NOT in that camp of believers. I wanted to clarify that position, as many often misread my insinuation. ..................................... Baron Coleman Baron, I think you are the only who considers all aspects of this investigation without bias, or concerns for the outcome. Everybody else that I know off do not discuss any aspect that does not fit into their already preconceived theory. That of course, would be covering all the aspects that you are aware of, with plenty of them that you definitely missed. I am pretty sure you have missed this one also. So, maybe you would care to address it ?

US_did_ 911

58,303 次观看 • 1 个月前

“I'm not proud of the presidential primary that produced Atiku Abubakar because it fell below my expectations. But, of course, that is what we have now, and it is not good enough because I expected that we (ADC) would have done much better than this. I was an electoral officer; I witnessed some of these things that happened, and, of course, we should have outgrown them by this stage. After 26–27 years of democracy, we should not be talking about rigging of primaries or falsification of results. The coalition, as it is now, is not dead, but it is not as formidable as it was.” — Solomon Dalung
3:23

“I'm not proud of the presidential primary that produced Atiku Abubakar because it fell below my expectations. But, of course, that is what we have now, and it is not good enough because I expected that we (ADC) would have done much better than this. I was an electoral officer; I witnessed some of these things that happened, and, of course, we should have outgrown them by this stage. After 26–27 years of democracy, we should not be talking about rigging of primaries or falsification of results. The coalition, as it is now, is not dead, but it is not as formidable as it was.” — Solomon Dalung

TheCable

58,149 次观看 • 2 个月前

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves
1:26

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

72,329 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here I explain the video of the person jumping off the roof. This is what they are using in court! I don’t know how you can drop an enormous bag or towel or rifle. It looks so big from a distance. As he gets off the roof he holds on with his left hand and then with his right hand he reaches to the right, not the left. Also, when he jumps off the roof, his knees must’ve banged his face. Tyler Robinson didn’t have a black eye or scratches at all?
3:35

Here I explain the video of the person jumping off the roof. This is what they are using in court! I don’t know how you can drop an enormous bag or towel or rifle. It looks so big from a distance. As he gets off the roof he holds on with his left hand and then with his right hand he reaches to the right, not the left. Also, when he jumps off the roof, his knees must’ve banged his face. Tyler Robinson didn’t have a black eye or scratches at all?

Alley Files

39,299 次观看 • 1 个月前

I came across this video of a young lady that was weeping during a priestly ordination in one of the dioceses in Nigeria last week Saturday. As expected, it attracted all kinds of reactions. Some immediately concluded that she was crying because "her boyfriend had left her to become a priest," along with many other dismissive comments. Those reactions are not the focus of this post. Perhaps I'll address them another day. What caught my attention was the explanation of someone who knew the young lady and her family and was present at the ordination. He shared that the lady weeping in the video and the newly ordained priest are the only two children in their family. The priest ordained that day was her only brother and seeing him ordained got her emotional. Many people may not understand that emotion, but I do. It reminds me of my own ordination to the diaconate. My mum cried almost throughout the entire Mass (Perhaps, if that scene were caught on the camera, someone might have concluded that it was a sugar mummy crying because her sugar son left her to become a priest😁). You see, people often think priestly ordination is only a joyful celebration. It is. But for many families, it is also a moment of profound sacrifice. From the day a man is ordained, he belongs to God in a new and irrevocable way. It does not mean he stops loving his family or cuts ties with them. But then, his life is no longer his own. His availability, his time, his heart, and his ministry are now given to the whole Church. Even when a priest visits his family during his vacation, he soon realizes he is no longer simply "at home." He returns as a son, certainly, but also as a priest. His parish becomes his home, and the people entrusted to his care become his family. This quiet sacrifice is one of the hidden dimensions of the priestly vocation. It is rarely spoken about, yet it is deeply real, not only for the priest, but also for those who love him most. Fr. Ugochukwu Ugwoke, ISch
0:21

I came across this video of a young lady that was weeping during a priestly ordination in one of the dioceses in Nigeria last week Saturday. As expected, it attracted all kinds of reactions. Some immediately concluded that she was crying because "her boyfriend had left her to become a priest," along with many other dismissive comments. Those reactions are not the focus of this post. Perhaps I'll address them another day. What caught my attention was the explanation of someone who knew the young lady and her family and was present at the ordination. He shared that the lady weeping in the video and the newly ordained priest are the only two children in their family. The priest ordained that day was her only brother and seeing him ordained got her emotional. Many people may not understand that emotion, but I do. It reminds me of my own ordination to the diaconate. My mum cried almost throughout the entire Mass (Perhaps, if that scene were caught on the camera, someone might have concluded that it was a sugar mummy crying because her sugar son left her to become a priest😁). You see, people often think priestly ordination is only a joyful celebration. It is. But for many families, it is also a moment of profound sacrifice. From the day a man is ordained, he belongs to God in a new and irrevocable way. It does not mean he stops loving his family or cuts ties with them. But then, his life is no longer his own. His availability, his time, his heart, and his ministry are now given to the whole Church. Even when a priest visits his family during his vacation, he soon realizes he is no longer simply "at home." He returns as a son, certainly, but also as a priest. His parish becomes his home, and the people entrusted to his care become his family. This quiet sacrifice is one of the hidden dimensions of the priestly vocation. It is rarely spoken about, yet it is deeply real, not only for the priest, but also for those who love him most. Fr. Ugochukwu Ugwoke, ISch

Ugochukwu Ugwoke, ISch

47,935 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele credits the hand of God for TURNING AROUND his country in favor of prosperity and safety 🇺🇸🇸🇻 "It was the hand of God. And no one can doubt it!" "It is a constant proof that God works when asked with faith. Transforming that, the most dangerous country in the world, into what it is today, is the clearest miracle." "If God took what was already more or less good and perfected it, yes, it was a miracle..." "...but if God took the worst and turned it into security, into the best, then it is an example of a miracle. Without a doubt, and with proof. What are the proofs? Not only the great fact, but what we supposedly did." "We have to confess that we do not know how it happened. And there is no one who can come and explain how it happened. Otherwise, let it not be a miracle." BUKELE IS INCREDIBLE! A model for the West!
1:10

🚨 BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele credits the hand of God for TURNING AROUND his country in favor of prosperity and safety 🇺🇸🇸🇻 "It was the hand of God. And no one can doubt it!" "It is a constant proof that God works when asked with faith. Transforming that, the most dangerous country in the world, into what it is today, is the clearest miracle." "If God took what was already more or less good and perfected it, yes, it was a miracle..." "...but if God took the worst and turned it into security, into the best, then it is an example of a miracle. Without a doubt, and with proof. What are the proofs? Not only the great fact, but what we supposedly did." "We have to confess that we do not know how it happened. And there is no one who can come and explain how it happened. Otherwise, let it not be a miracle." BUKELE IS INCREDIBLE! A model for the West!

Eric Daugherty

136,778 次观看 • 7 个月前

Assertions that it was half and half and “she’s as bad” disproved in this clip of the same loss of temper at speed. Cllr Natalie Oliver keeps her hands mainly in her own lap or she has an occasional open handed, palm up and very brief gesture towards Mothin Ali He leans sideways slightly towards her. She draws away and places her hands back in her lap. He jabs at her and his hands leave his personal space many times. His hand is higher than hers. The other interviewee keeps her hands in her lap the whole time and looks uncomfortable. This is not standard political gesturing as some have suggested. It is a man not in control of making his points after a loss of temper and who is using his hands and facial expressions to shut down challenge. It is what it is. This is not biased support for one politician over the other. It is a feminist observation of their interaction.
0:37

Assertions that it was half and half and “she’s as bad” disproved in this clip of the same loss of temper at speed. Cllr Natalie Oliver keeps her hands mainly in her own lap or she has an occasional open handed, palm up and very brief gesture towards Mothin Ali He leans sideways slightly towards her. She draws away and places her hands back in her lap. He jabs at her and his hands leave his personal space many times. His hand is higher than hers. The other interviewee keeps her hands in her lap the whole time and looks uncomfortable. This is not standard political gesturing as some have suggested. It is a man not in control of making his points after a loss of temper and who is using his hands and facial expressions to shut down challenge. It is what it is. This is not biased support for one politician over the other. It is a feminist observation of their interaction.

Jean Hatchet

24,018 次观看 • 3 个月前

i love how unjeong was trying so hard to not use his powers in front of them but then he got annoyed that a small swish of his hand wasn’t enough and was like fuck it 😂
2:04

i love how unjeong was trying so hard to not use his powers in front of them but then he got annoyed that a small swish of his hand wasn’t enough and was like fuck it 😂

suzie ꕤ

33,099 次观看 • 3 个月前