正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨A CIA-connected scientist successfully beamed messages directly into people's heads and an Atomic Energy Commission official who demanded to be tested himself confirmed it worked. Then men in suits showed up at Intellectron, Puharich's front company, the day JFK was assassinated and left Puharich visibly shaken. Allen Dulles personally...

AmericanALCHMY's profile picture

American Alchemy

33,705 subscribers

67,723 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A group of elites held seances and believed they were receiving instructions from nine extraterrestrial beings. One member of that circle, Ruth Forbes Payne, had a daughter who took in Lee Harvey Oswald, got him a job at the Texas Book Depository, and the rest is history. The JFK assassination is tangled up in UFO lore in ways most people have never heard. "The group in the seance believed themselves to be agents of these extraterrestrials. Acting on their behalf." "Ruth Forbes Payne's daughter takes in Lee Harvey Oswald. He gets a job at the Texas Book Depository through her." "Puharich would stop at airports and meditate because he thought the Nine would speak to him through his watch." "Was it all good or was it bad? The assassination of JFK seems kind of bad." "He seemed like a great man who was resisting really dark forces." New episode coming soon.
1:21

A group of elites held seances and believed they were receiving instructions from nine extraterrestrial beings. One member of that circle, Ruth Forbes Payne, had a daughter who took in Lee Harvey Oswald, got him a job at the Texas Book Depository, and the rest is history. The JFK assassination is tangled up in UFO lore in ways most people have never heard. "The group in the seance believed themselves to be agents of these extraterrestrials. Acting on their behalf." "Ruth Forbes Payne's daughter takes in Lee Harvey Oswald. He gets a job at the Texas Book Depository through her." "Puharich would stop at airports and meditate because he thought the Nine would speak to him through his watch." "Was it all good or was it bad? The assassination of JFK seems kind of bad." "He seemed like a great man who was resisting really dark forces." New episode coming soon.

American Alchemy

121,504 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jameis Winston says he only admitted to stealing the crab legs to avoid a suspension at Florida State “It was a whole miscommunication of how it happened. And I had to do, in terms of talking to the compliance people at Florida State so I would not get suspended and I would not lose no time at Florida State. So that is why I had to confess up to saying that I did something that I did not do” “Florida State has a history of having the hookup, then somebody turning on them, and then they blame it on the player. But I had to take that one because I didn't want no games or anything coming from me” “When you look at the grand scheme of things, if it was free… when it was free, just because you're able to do that doesn't mean that you're not able to not get the consequences when somebody inside the store says that you did do that” “If you are policing your own self and someone inside the store says, ‘No, he did this,’ and they turn you in and then flip their take, they go back and look at the tape, and they've got the footage… I'mma say, ‘Nah, I got them for free.’ And they're going to be like, ‘No, you didn't get them for free.’ You think I'm gonna tell on myself”
1:27

Jameis Winston says he only admitted to stealing the crab legs to avoid a suspension at Florida State “It was a whole miscommunication of how it happened. And I had to do, in terms of talking to the compliance people at Florida State so I would not get suspended and I would not lose no time at Florida State. So that is why I had to confess up to saying that I did something that I did not do” “Florida State has a history of having the hookup, then somebody turning on them, and then they blame it on the player. But I had to take that one because I didn't want no games or anything coming from me” “When you look at the grand scheme of things, if it was free… when it was free, just because you're able to do that doesn't mean that you're not able to not get the consequences when somebody inside the store says that you did do that” “If you are policing your own self and someone inside the store says, ‘No, he did this,’ and they turn you in and then flip their take, they go back and look at the tape, and they've got the footage… I'mma say, ‘Nah, I got them for free.’ And they're going to be like, ‘No, you didn't get them for free.’ You think I'm gonna tell on myself”

dank

255,480 次观看 • 23 天前

We waited six decades for the JFK files to be released and not tell us who killed JFK… but we did confirm the official story was nonsense, we did confirm members of the government were involved, & we did confirm the CIA was in communication with our most special ally and didn’t want that to get out. At this point a file release is not enough. The American people deserve a new church committee.
1:15

We waited six decades for the JFK files to be released and not tell us who killed JFK… but we did confirm the official story was nonsense, we did confirm members of the government were involved, & we did confirm the CIA was in communication with our most special ally and didn’t want that to get out. At this point a file release is not enough. The American people deserve a new church committee.

Brett Pike

42,229 次观看 • 1 年前

President Trump went on Fox News to talk about the new show that came out about JFK Junior and Carolyn Bissett and in the interview he says that JFK always wanted to be an actor, but he was pushed into politics by his family and you have to know that Trump speaks in codes, so his words have a double meaning and what he meant in this instance is that JFK Junior did become an actor he faked his death and he helped the queue team to save the entire world alongside his wife Carolyn, and then we have the show revealing it all at the end saying that those two did not die while they were looking at the ocean were supposedly they’re plain malfunctioned and sunk in 1999.
2:39

President Trump went on Fox News to talk about the new show that came out about JFK Junior and Carolyn Bissett and in the interview he says that JFK always wanted to be an actor, but he was pushed into politics by his family and you have to know that Trump speaks in codes, so his words have a double meaning and what he meant in this instance is that JFK Junior did become an actor he faked his death and he helped the queue team to save the entire world alongside his wife Carolyn, and then we have the show revealing it all at the end saying that those two did not die while they were looking at the ocean were supposedly they’re plain malfunctioned and sunk in 1999.

Danielle knows a lot

28,691 次观看 • 17 小时前

🚨 JUST IN: The CIA has just SEIZED boxes of DOCUMENTS in DNI Tulsi Gabbard's office relating to the JFK files and MKUltra, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says LUNA: "We were actually just notified that the CIA went in and took documents out of ODNI. Multiple boxes pertaining to the JFK files as well as MKUltra." "The reason why this is troubling is A, there was an executive order that the president had directed the full declassification of JFK, but then also to the MKUltra files." "The CIA famously has said that, you know, all documents were released and other documents had been destroyed. So these are allegedly those documents that apparently never existed." "And so very troubling. I did just talk to Chairman Comer and we are sending in the next hour or so a preservation of documents requests to the CIA." "I have called into the White House to the director of the CIA himself. And so obviously, as this develops, we'll keep everyone up to date. But strange times we're living." Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Katie Pavlich
0:55

🚨 JUST IN: The CIA has just SEIZED boxes of DOCUMENTS in DNI Tulsi Gabbard's office relating to the JFK files and MKUltra, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says LUNA: "We were actually just notified that the CIA went in and took documents out of ODNI. Multiple boxes pertaining to the JFK files as well as MKUltra." "The reason why this is troubling is A, there was an executive order that the president had directed the full declassification of JFK, but then also to the MKUltra files." "The CIA famously has said that, you know, all documents were released and other documents had been destroyed. So these are allegedly those documents that apparently never existed." "And so very troubling. I did just talk to Chairman Comer and we are sending in the next hour or so a preservation of documents requests to the CIA." "I have called into the White House to the director of the CIA himself. And so obviously, as this develops, we'll keep everyone up to date. But strange times we're living." Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Katie Pavlich

Eric Daugherty

589,669 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith says Megyn Kelly "opened up a big time can of whoop *ss" on Jake Tapper — and "HE DESERVED IT"🚨 "Why did he deserve it? Here's why: You got the video of him talking to Lara Trump — and how condescending he was to her, et cetera." "It's not the fact that you were just wrong. It was the defiance and the condescending approach that you had and the dismissive approach that you had towards others. That's what we should all be careful for — and he wasn't." "And a lot of folks on the left were not. And that's why they're getting it handed to them by the conservative side at this particular moment in time." Daily Caller
1:31

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith says Megyn Kelly "opened up a big time can of whoop *ss" on Jake Tapper — and "HE DESERVED IT"🚨 "Why did he deserve it? Here's why: You got the video of him talking to Lara Trump — and how condescending he was to her, et cetera." "It's not the fact that you were just wrong. It was the defiance and the condescending approach that you had and the dismissive approach that you had towards others. That's what we should all be careful for — and he wasn't." "And a lot of folks on the left were not. And that's why they're getting it handed to them by the conservative side at this particular moment in time." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

164,272 次观看 • 1 年前

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”
3:10

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 次观看 • 8 个月前

"At school or university, the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who can do that, but for the rest of us, we're not brilliant. And to get there, we have to strive and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right first time, you don't get it right second time. In my case, and I counted it, it's 5,127 times. One of the things I always want to say is that sounds like a struggle. It was a struggle, but actually it was a hugely enjoyable struggle. The debt was mounting and I had three children, a wife and a home, and then a mortgage to pay, like everybody else. But I had a real point in life, I had a real aim and I had to get there. And the failures were interesting because I'd learned from every single one of them."
0:51

"At school or university, the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who can do that, but for the rest of us, we're not brilliant. And to get there, we have to strive and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right first time, you don't get it right second time. In my case, and I counted it, it's 5,127 times. One of the things I always want to say is that sounds like a struggle. It was a struggle, but actually it was a hugely enjoyable struggle. The debt was mounting and I had three children, a wife and a home, and then a mortgage to pay, like everybody else. But I had a real point in life, I had a real aim and I had to get there. And the failures were interesting because I'd learned from every single one of them."

David Senra

137,546 次观看 • 8 个月前

Why Elon didn't want to be CEO: "[Elon] is at core, an engineer and a product guy. He has this great line where he said: "I realized you couldn't be fully in control of the product unless you were also in control of the company." He says he made a moral error, early in Tesla, where he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wanted to control the company without running the company. And that was the 2002 to 2008 era, where Tesla was just off to a really messy start. He was providing the funding. He was chairman of the board. But Martin Eberhard was CEO. Eventually, when Tesla was on the verge of death in 2008....Elon was pushed into the position of: "I have to be CEO. I don't want to be. It comes with a lot of chores. It comes with a lot of responsibilities. But if I want this company to be successful, I have to fully internalize and take responsibility for it." And that's what he did, even though he was also in the same position at SpaceX. The fact that these companies are improbable, iconic, and that he funded and led them both in parallel...it's like running a two minute mile twice at the same time. It is such a higher degree of difficulty than most people can conceive of, and the fact that it worked is still unbelievable."
4:24

Why Elon didn't want to be CEO: "[Elon] is at core, an engineer and a product guy. He has this great line where he said: "I realized you couldn't be fully in control of the product unless you were also in control of the company." He says he made a moral error, early in Tesla, where he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wanted to control the company without running the company. And that was the 2002 to 2008 era, where Tesla was just off to a really messy start. He was providing the funding. He was chairman of the board. But Martin Eberhard was CEO. Eventually, when Tesla was on the verge of death in 2008....Elon was pushed into the position of: "I have to be CEO. I don't want to be. It comes with a lot of chores. It comes with a lot of responsibilities. But if I want this company to be successful, I have to fully internalize and take responsibility for it." And that's what he did, even though he was also in the same position at SpaceX. The fact that these companies are improbable, iconic, and that he funded and led them both in parallel...it's like running a two minute mile twice at the same time. It is such a higher degree of difficulty than most people can conceive of, and the fact that it worked is still unbelievable."

Ti Morse

47,497 次观看 • 4 个月前

Michael Phelps on how to accomplish big things: "When I said I wanted to win eight gold medals, basically half the people in the swimming world thought I was absolutely crazy and nobody could ever do something like that. But for me, I was somebody who believed in it and somebody who believed in the process of getting there." Michael knew it wouldn't happen overnight. As he puts it: "Every little small thing that we did was a small stepping stone in order to even be able to have that chance and that opportunity to do what I did in 2008. From 2002 to 2008 was basically trial and error." On managing pressure during the Olympics: "Winning a gold medal is absolutely incredible, but I knew that I had seven other events after the first day. So I have to throw that in the back of my head, throw that race out. I broke a world record, won my first gold medal, cool, things are starting really well. I have to put that behind me to get ready for the next race." He continues: "On top of that I have to make sure I'm eating the right amount, I'm sleeping the right amount, my body is as fresh as I can possibly be. That means sitting in an ice tank, getting massages, getting stretched. All of these small things end up adding up to the major end result." His daily approach: "We would call it putting money into the bank. At the end of the year when we had a major international competition, we could withdraw that money that we had saved throughout the year." On motivation: "I'll be the first one to tell you there were a lot of days where I did not want to get out of bed. But if you have those little small goals, those little small things that get you excited when you don't want to, it's going to make it even better and even easier at the end." The difference between good and great: "If you look at the greats in any walk of life, the greats do things when they don't always want to. And that's the separation for me." Small daily deposits create Olympic results.
4:05

Michael Phelps on how to accomplish big things: "When I said I wanted to win eight gold medals, basically half the people in the swimming world thought I was absolutely crazy and nobody could ever do something like that. But for me, I was somebody who believed in it and somebody who believed in the process of getting there." Michael knew it wouldn't happen overnight. As he puts it: "Every little small thing that we did was a small stepping stone in order to even be able to have that chance and that opportunity to do what I did in 2008. From 2002 to 2008 was basically trial and error." On managing pressure during the Olympics: "Winning a gold medal is absolutely incredible, but I knew that I had seven other events after the first day. So I have to throw that in the back of my head, throw that race out. I broke a world record, won my first gold medal, cool, things are starting really well. I have to put that behind me to get ready for the next race." He continues: "On top of that I have to make sure I'm eating the right amount, I'm sleeping the right amount, my body is as fresh as I can possibly be. That means sitting in an ice tank, getting massages, getting stretched. All of these small things end up adding up to the major end result." His daily approach: "We would call it putting money into the bank. At the end of the year when we had a major international competition, we could withdraw that money that we had saved throughout the year." On motivation: "I'll be the first one to tell you there were a lot of days where I did not want to get out of bed. But if you have those little small goals, those little small things that get you excited when you don't want to, it's going to make it even better and even easier at the end." The difference between good and great: "If you look at the greats in any walk of life, the greats do things when they don't always want to. And that's the separation for me." Small daily deposits create Olympic results.

Jaynit

80,879 次观看 • 7 个月前

Michael Phelps on how to accomplish big things: "When I said I wanted to win eight gold medals, basically half the people in the swimming world thought I was absolutely crazy and nobody could ever do something like that. But for me, I was somebody who believed in it and somebody who believed in the process of getting there." Michael knew it wouldn't happen overnight. As he puts it: "Every little small thing that we did was a small stepping stone in order to even be able to have that chance and that opportunity to do what I did in 2008. From 2002 to 2008 was basically trial and error." On managing pressure during the Olympics: "Winning a gold medal is absolutely incredible, but I knew that I had seven other events after the first day. So I have to throw that in the back of my head, throw that race out. I broke a world record, won my first gold medal, cool, things are starting really well. I have to put that behind me to get ready for the next race." He continues: "On top of that I have to make sure I'm eating the right amount, I'm sleeping the right amount, my body is as fresh as I can possibly be. That means sitting in an ice tank, getting massages, getting stretched. All of these small things end up adding up to the major end result." His daily approach: "We would call it putting money into the bank. At the end of the year when we had a major international competition, we could withdraw that money that we had saved throughout the year." On motivation: "I'll be the first one to tell you there were a lot of days where I did not want to get out of bed. But if you have those little small goals, those little small things that get you excited when you don't want to, it's going to make it even better and even easier at the end." The difference between good and great: "If you look at the greats in any walk of life, the greats do things when they don't always want to. And that's the separation for me." Small daily deposits create Olympic results.
4:05

Michael Phelps on how to accomplish big things: "When I said I wanted to win eight gold medals, basically half the people in the swimming world thought I was absolutely crazy and nobody could ever do something like that. But for me, I was somebody who believed in it and somebody who believed in the process of getting there." Michael knew it wouldn't happen overnight. As he puts it: "Every little small thing that we did was a small stepping stone in order to even be able to have that chance and that opportunity to do what I did in 2008. From 2002 to 2008 was basically trial and error." On managing pressure during the Olympics: "Winning a gold medal is absolutely incredible, but I knew that I had seven other events after the first day. So I have to throw that in the back of my head, throw that race out. I broke a world record, won my first gold medal, cool, things are starting really well. I have to put that behind me to get ready for the next race." He continues: "On top of that I have to make sure I'm eating the right amount, I'm sleeping the right amount, my body is as fresh as I can possibly be. That means sitting in an ice tank, getting massages, getting stretched. All of these small things end up adding up to the major end result." His daily approach: "We would call it putting money into the bank. At the end of the year when we had a major international competition, we could withdraw that money that we had saved throughout the year." On motivation: "I'll be the first one to tell you there were a lot of days where I did not want to get out of bed. But if you have those little small goals, those little small things that get you excited when you don't want to, it's going to make it even better and even easier at the end." The difference between good and great: "If you look at the greats in any walk of life, the greats do things when they don't always want to. And that's the separation for me." Small daily deposits create Olympic results.

Jaynit

50,838 次观看 • 2 个月前

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith explains how the Covid PCR "tests" were likely used to collect people's DNA and send said DNA to gene banks. This DNA, Smith hypothesizes, can now be used by Larry Ellison's Stargate program to create genome-tailored "vaccines." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with Charlie Robinson (Macroaggressions Podcast with Charlie Robinson) posted to the Macroaggressions Rumble channel on December 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Genetics is, you know, all basically eugenics. And so fast forward to 2020 when I started realizing, oh, there's these false positives with the test. And I knew that you didn't even need to have a test to be diagnosed with it. The doctors had to look at you and say, oh, I think you have Covid. So that's so smart that you were thinking, oh, it's gotta be a genetic screen. "Because at some point down the line, I've actually found documentation from the CDC that ordered every CLIA certified lab to send genetics, sequences to one of two different gene banks. G I S A I— G I S A I D. So GI SAID, or NCBI, one of those two gene banks. And it did say in the fine print, like, oh, these sequences for Covid. "But I asked David Rasnick, who I did an interview with, and he actually knew Kary Mullis and worked with Kary Mullis at one point, who invented PCR. And I asked him this specifically. I said, so obviously the PCR can run an entire DNA sequence. And here's this instruction. I showed him the document. I said, okay, they're sending these sequences and people are trolling me. You know, the Internet masses are commenting back saying, oh, no, that was just the sequence for Covid, for the variant of COVID because they had like six of them listed out. "And I asked him, do you think they're actually, like, after they run the PCR test and they get this sequence and then they have to send it to the gene bank, do you think they're actually spending the time to edit it and cut out just that section? Or do you think they're just sending the whole thing and then the gene bank can decide which section they want to take as their sequence? And he goes, they don't have the time to go in and edit all of that. I mean, they could, but most likely, no. Most likely they're just sending the whole thing. "Then the gene bank that, that they send it to, and he's shown evidence of how much DNA has been sent to these gene banks. They're tracking all of it carefully. So, yeah, that's absolutely what they're doing. Well, NCBI and GISAID, I haven't looked into who owns them, but there's another one that was creating PCR tests. And I believe that all of the PCR tests were doing the same thing, sending, genetic information back to some, some hive mind, whether that's NCBI or, you know, some other gene bank. "So it's generally the testing places that are, you know, having it send back. So there is the Human Genome Project in China, which is now, I forget the name, it's, it changed its name, but it's the biggest biotech company in China now. And they made PCR test kits, PCR and the IgG, which is the antibody test, and they send it to America. And who do you think is getting those results back? "So our DNA is going to some Chinese database. And even our own American military has flagged that gene bank as being a problem because they have all our individual information. And when you go to that gene bank and the other ones are really similar when you look at like why they exist and what they think they're doing with our DNA. Because I was really interested in why are they collecting all of this? They're obviously going to use it against us in some way. "So what is that? How do we get ahead of that or how do we stop it? And it says on the the one in China anyway. And the other ones basically say it and not in so clear terms that they are collecting our DNA because they need this massive amount population genomics so they can create vaccines and therapeutics or drugs, biologics tailored to our individual genome. "And then we have Larry Ellison come out with Donald Trump on day two of the administration saying exactly that. We're going to use AI to analyze your blood, which is how they get the DNA gene sequences. It's AI that creates the DNA gene sequences, that sends it to the gene banks. That's why it's electronic and they can send it, because it's using AI. It's not like, you know, a sample that they're sending. Physically, it's a digital code. It all comes together."
4:34

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith explains how the Covid PCR "tests" were likely used to collect people's DNA and send said DNA to gene banks. This DNA, Smith hypothesizes, can now be used by Larry Ellison's Stargate program to create genome-tailored "vaccines." This clip of Smith (Zowe Smith), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with Charlie Robinson (Macroaggressions Podcast with Charlie Robinson) posted to the Macroaggressions Rumble channel on December 3, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Genetics is, you know, all basically eugenics. And so fast forward to 2020 when I started realizing, oh, there's these false positives with the test. And I knew that you didn't even need to have a test to be diagnosed with it. The doctors had to look at you and say, oh, I think you have Covid. So that's so smart that you were thinking, oh, it's gotta be a genetic screen. "Because at some point down the line, I've actually found documentation from the CDC that ordered every CLIA certified lab to send genetics, sequences to one of two different gene banks. G I S A I— G I S A I D. So GI SAID, or NCBI, one of those two gene banks. And it did say in the fine print, like, oh, these sequences for Covid. "But I asked David Rasnick, who I did an interview with, and he actually knew Kary Mullis and worked with Kary Mullis at one point, who invented PCR. And I asked him this specifically. I said, so obviously the PCR can run an entire DNA sequence. And here's this instruction. I showed him the document. I said, okay, they're sending these sequences and people are trolling me. You know, the Internet masses are commenting back saying, oh, no, that was just the sequence for Covid, for the variant of COVID because they had like six of them listed out. "And I asked him, do you think they're actually, like, after they run the PCR test and they get this sequence and then they have to send it to the gene bank, do you think they're actually spending the time to edit it and cut out just that section? Or do you think they're just sending the whole thing and then the gene bank can decide which section they want to take as their sequence? And he goes, they don't have the time to go in and edit all of that. I mean, they could, but most likely, no. Most likely they're just sending the whole thing. "Then the gene bank that, that they send it to, and he's shown evidence of how much DNA has been sent to these gene banks. They're tracking all of it carefully. So, yeah, that's absolutely what they're doing. Well, NCBI and GISAID, I haven't looked into who owns them, but there's another one that was creating PCR tests. And I believe that all of the PCR tests were doing the same thing, sending, genetic information back to some, some hive mind, whether that's NCBI or, you know, some other gene bank. "So it's generally the testing places that are, you know, having it send back. So there is the Human Genome Project in China, which is now, I forget the name, it's, it changed its name, but it's the biggest biotech company in China now. And they made PCR test kits, PCR and the IgG, which is the antibody test, and they send it to America. And who do you think is getting those results back? "So our DNA is going to some Chinese database. And even our own American military has flagged that gene bank as being a problem because they have all our individual information. And when you go to that gene bank and the other ones are really similar when you look at like why they exist and what they think they're doing with our DNA. Because I was really interested in why are they collecting all of this? They're obviously going to use it against us in some way. "So what is that? How do we get ahead of that or how do we stop it? And it says on the the one in China anyway. And the other ones basically say it and not in so clear terms that they are collecting our DNA because they need this massive amount population genomics so they can create vaccines and therapeutics or drugs, biologics tailored to our individual genome. "And then we have Larry Ellison come out with Donald Trump on day two of the administration saying exactly that. We're going to use AI to analyze your blood, which is how they get the DNA gene sequences. It's AI that creates the DNA gene sequences, that sends it to the gene banks. That's why it's electronic and they can send it, because it's using AI. It's not like, you know, a sample that they're sending. Physically, it's a digital code. It all comes together."

Sense Receptor

35,149 次观看 • 7 个月前

JFK was shot and murdered by a communist. Lee Harvey Oswald was a pro-Soviet, pro-Cuba freak, basically the Tyler Robinson of his time. Just as in the case of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, idiots immediately dreamt up a bunch of conspiracy theories in order to try divert blame away from the far-left. I believe that the American deep state most likely invented conspiracy theories surrounding the shooting of JFK in order to muddy the waters and divert blame away from the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. I think that’s literally what happened. The guy who shot JFK had literally defected to the Soviet Union and spent years living there. Can you imagine how crazy that is? A literal defector to the Soviet Union shot and murdered the President of the United States at the height of the Cold War. The American establishment had to defuse the tension. There was overwhelming pressure on them to try divert blame away from the Soviets. I went to the LBJ Presidential Library yesterday. I listened to LBJ call up Senator Dick Russell and ask him to serve on the Warren Commission - he said that right wing agitators were trying to blame the shooting of JFK on the Soviet Union and that he needed Dick Russell on the Warren Commission to help prove it wasn’t the Soviets, because 40 million Americans would die in one hour in the event of a nuclear exchange. I love LBJ cause I read the full 4,500 page Caro series and it’s the best thing I’ve ever read. But you could hear their desperation to make sure the Soviets weren’t blamed. A communist shot JFK. The American establishment feared it would mean war. So we’ve had 60 years of industrial scale propaganda telling us that we don’t know the full story. That Lee Harvey Oswald was just a patsy. Communists killed JFK. They destroy everything they touch. Don’t let them get away with it. God bless America on the 250th and forever death to communism.
1:02

JFK was shot and murdered by a communist. Lee Harvey Oswald was a pro-Soviet, pro-Cuba freak, basically the Tyler Robinson of his time. Just as in the case of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, idiots immediately dreamt up a bunch of conspiracy theories in order to try divert blame away from the far-left. I believe that the American deep state most likely invented conspiracy theories surrounding the shooting of JFK in order to muddy the waters and divert blame away from the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. I think that’s literally what happened. The guy who shot JFK had literally defected to the Soviet Union and spent years living there. Can you imagine how crazy that is? A literal defector to the Soviet Union shot and murdered the President of the United States at the height of the Cold War. The American establishment had to defuse the tension. There was overwhelming pressure on them to try divert blame away from the Soviets. I went to the LBJ Presidential Library yesterday. I listened to LBJ call up Senator Dick Russell and ask him to serve on the Warren Commission - he said that right wing agitators were trying to blame the shooting of JFK on the Soviet Union and that he needed Dick Russell on the Warren Commission to help prove it wasn’t the Soviets, because 40 million Americans would die in one hour in the event of a nuclear exchange. I love LBJ cause I read the full 4,500 page Caro series and it’s the best thing I’ve ever read. But you could hear their desperation to make sure the Soviets weren’t blamed. A communist shot JFK. The American establishment feared it would mean war. So we’ve had 60 years of industrial scale propaganda telling us that we don’t know the full story. That Lee Harvey Oswald was just a patsy. Communists killed JFK. They destroy everything they touch. Don’t let them get away with it. God bless America on the 250th and forever death to communism.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

12,654 次观看 • 1 个月前

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?
7:39

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 次观看 • 9 个月前

Newly released footage from inside Epstein’s cell on his last day alive 👀 WHAT IS THAT IN HIS HAND⁉️ Looks like a cell phone to me, and that he is on the phone with someone. Take a look at what's on the ground as well! Did they provide him with the noose and force him to do it? Why did it take so long to release the taps? At this point, I am not even sure if I believe the footage is real. Wouldn’t that have more if it were? Very suspicious! Time to release every file and tape they have immediately. We demand justice for all the victims and prison time for all of the celebrities and billionaires who participated!
0:22

Newly released footage from inside Epstein’s cell on his last day alive 👀 WHAT IS THAT IN HIS HAND⁉️ Looks like a cell phone to me, and that he is on the phone with someone. Take a look at what's on the ground as well! Did they provide him with the noose and force him to do it? Why did it take so long to release the taps? At this point, I am not even sure if I believe the footage is real. Wouldn’t that have more if it were? Very suspicious! Time to release every file and tape they have immediately. We demand justice for all the victims and prison time for all of the celebrities and billionaires who participated!

Matt Wallace

664,365 次观看 • 8 个月前