Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

A Constitutional Lawyer Just Confirmed That Census Enumerators Can Be Charged With Trespassing Did you know that census enumerators can be charged with trespassing? If you have received the 2026 long form census and an enumerator has been knocking at your door, calling you, and refusing to leave you... show more

Nico Lagan

6,419 subscribers

13,038 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Q: You're a constitutional lawyer. Can you detail the 4th Amendment protections someone has if an ICE agent approaches their home with an administrative warrant? MIKE JOHNSON: When ICE goes to execute a warrant, it's an administrative warrant and it's issued by an immigration judge, and that is a sufficient legal authority to go and apprehend someone

Q: You're a constitutional lawyer. Can you detail the 4th Amendment protections someone has if an ICE agent approaches their home with an administrative warrant? MIKE JOHNSON: When ICE goes to execute a warrant, it's an administrative warrant and it's issued by an immigration judge, and that is a sufficient legal authority to go and apprehend someone

Aaron Rupar

795,364 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

What do we want you to do? Don't stab people. You can tell your son to walk away. You can tell your son not to stab people. You can tell your son if the school has a rule that you can't bring out a knife, don't do it. You can tell your son that if he's committing trespassing and he's asked, according to the testimony in the trial, 15 times to leave, he should do it. Let's start with that.

What do we want you to do? Don't stab people. You can tell your son to walk away. You can tell your son not to stab people. You can tell your son if the school has a rule that you can't bring out a knife, don't do it. You can tell your son that if he's committing trespassing and he's asked, according to the testimony in the trial, 15 times to leave, he should do it. Let's start with that.

Steven Crowder

218,290 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Secret Census Form Enumerators Fill Out On Your Porch When You Say No You refused the census. You closed the door. You thought that was the end of it. It wasn't. Form 4-BIL is a real internal Statistics Canada document. It is not meant for citizens. It is filled out by enumerators on your front porch after you say no. It asks for your name, address, phone number, exact words you used, physical description, age range, height, hair colour, facial hair and tattoos. And at the top it states clearly — the information provided may be used to support a legal prosecution. They are not crossing you off a list. They are building a physical profile of you to hand to federal prosecutors. You'll want to hear my full breakdown 👇

Nico Lagan

13,335 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Government agents at your door? When 'no' isn't enough Statistics Canada has recruited staff to go door-to-door to compel discerning Canadians to complete the 5-year Canadian census, but many refuseniks are pushing back against the intrusive demands. Canadians are pushing back against intrusive, mandatory census demands amid privacy concerns, revealing how growing distrust of government and tensions over compelled data collection clash with pushy enforcement tactics. When a Statistics Canada enumerator arrived unannounced at my property, the message was clear: participate in the mandatory census or face consequences. A calm response of “I’d prefer not to” is apparently not good enough, and the agent enumerator made it clear that there would be a follow-up. By way of background, this census is conducted every five years, requiring detailed household information, including names, birthdays, residents, and language preferences. Households receive either the short or the long-form version, the latter of which probes quite deeply into health, sexual orientation, gender identity, commuting, and daily activities. With 32,000 temporary staff hired for the 2026 cycle, enforcement appears to have intensified alongside refusals, including door-to-door visits, follow-up notices, text messages and phone calls. In the interaction, the agent stated there is a “legal obligation” and offered to complete the form on the spot or online. The agent confirmed that the census is not anonymous and referenced the Statistics Act. Lawyer Daniel Freiheit broke down surface-level obligations and some options available to refusing Canadians. Freiheit explained the penalties have softened: “You have to answer these questions. You have to answer them honestly, truthfully. And if you don’t, it’s no longer jail. It’s a $500 fine. And if you don’t pay the fine, you don’t go to jail either.” On verification, he advised: “One lawful excuse is verifying the identity of this person… I’d like to see your driver’s license, photo ID, government photo ID… Second, there’s also an oath that each enumerator… has to swear.” He noted potential Charter arguments: “There is a charter right to free speech… you don’t have to speak just because somebody tells you to speak… especially the new ones that don’t have a precedent yet.” Historical legal precedents do show low risk, albeit the outcomes are mixed. In 2013, 89-year-old WWII veteran Audrey Tobias refused due to U.S. contractor involvement and was acquitted; the judge criticized the government for targeting a “model citizen.” In 2014, 79-year-old Janet Churnin was found guilty on similar grounds but received a conditional discharge and community service; no fine or jail. Statistics Canada rarely pursues court action despite the acclaimed legal framework touted by the enumerator. Freiheit and others note that while basic population data aids planning, aggressive tactics further erode trust in Canada’s federal Liberals. This is especially true given that Statistics Canada monetizes data through custom sales to businesses, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars per year. In an era of economic pressure and heightened privacy awareness, many Canadians question the balance between civic duty and personal boundaries. As the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms) launches a judicial review of certain invasive aspects of the long-form census on Charter grounds, it begs the question: At what point does “civic duty” become state coercion? And how much of your private life are you willing to surrender before you say “enough is enough”? Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Government agents at your door? When 'no' isn't enough Statistics Canada has recruited staff to go door-to-door to compel discerning Canadians to complete the 5-year Canadian census, but many refuseniks are pushing back against the intrusive demands. Canadians are pushing back against intrusive, mandatory census demands amid privacy concerns, revealing how growing distrust of government and tensions over compelled data collection clash with pushy enforcement tactics. When a Statistics Canada enumerator arrived unannounced at my property, the message was clear: participate in the mandatory census or face consequences. A calm response of “I’d prefer not to” is apparently not good enough, and the agent enumerator made it clear that there would be a follow-up. By way of background, this census is conducted every five years, requiring detailed household information, including names, birthdays, residents, and language preferences. Households receive either the short or the long-form version, the latter of which probes quite deeply into health, sexual orientation, gender identity, commuting, and daily activities. With 32,000 temporary staff hired for the 2026 cycle, enforcement appears to have intensified alongside refusals, including door-to-door visits, follow-up notices, text messages and phone calls. In the interaction, the agent stated there is a “legal obligation” and offered to complete the form on the spot or online. The agent confirmed that the census is not anonymous and referenced the Statistics Act. Lawyer Daniel Freiheit broke down surface-level obligations and some options available to refusing Canadians. Freiheit explained the penalties have softened: “You have to answer these questions. You have to answer them honestly, truthfully. And if you don’t, it’s no longer jail. It’s a $500 fine. And if you don’t pay the fine, you don’t go to jail either.” On verification, he advised: “One lawful excuse is verifying the identity of this person… I’d like to see your driver’s license, photo ID, government photo ID… Second, there’s also an oath that each enumerator… has to swear.” He noted potential Charter arguments: “There is a charter right to free speech… you don’t have to speak just because somebody tells you to speak… especially the new ones that don’t have a precedent yet.” Historical legal precedents do show low risk, albeit the outcomes are mixed. In 2013, 89-year-old WWII veteran Audrey Tobias refused due to U.S. contractor involvement and was acquitted; the judge criticized the government for targeting a “model citizen.” In 2014, 79-year-old Janet Churnin was found guilty on similar grounds but received a conditional discharge and community service; no fine or jail. Statistics Canada rarely pursues court action despite the acclaimed legal framework touted by the enumerator. Freiheit and others note that while basic population data aids planning, aggressive tactics further erode trust in Canada’s federal Liberals. This is especially true given that Statistics Canada monetizes data through custom sales to businesses, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars per year. In an era of economic pressure and heightened privacy awareness, many Canadians question the balance between civic duty and personal boundaries. As the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms) launches a judicial review of certain invasive aspects of the long-form census on Charter grounds, it begs the question: At what point does “civic duty” become state coercion? And how much of your private life are you willing to surrender before you say “enough is enough”? Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Rebel News

30,074 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

KARL: There's a constitutional requirement that you have to be a natural-born citizen to run for president. You were not born here. Do you think that's something that should be changed? MAMDANI: No. I think the Constitution looks good just the way it is.

KARL: There's a constitutional requirement that you have to be a natural-born citizen to run for president. You were not born here. Do you think that's something that should be changed? MAMDANI: No. I think the Constitution looks good just the way it is.

Aaron Rupar

2,064,094 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 Director of the US Census admits to not enforcing the law so that illegals could be counted in the Census and overcounts could happen Marjorie Taylor Greene “There's an actual law, Sentencing Reform act of 1984, that, that really is your job to fine people $5,000 for refusing to answer questions on the census. Was this a law that you enforced? Did you enforce this law and states that were over counted and states that were undercounted after the census?” Director of the Census Robert Santos “We’ve never enforced that” “So no one was fined. So there were overcounts”

🚨 Director of the US Census admits to not enforcing the law so that illegals could be counted in the Census and overcounts could happen Marjorie Taylor Greene “There's an actual law, Sentencing Reform act of 1984, that, that really is your job to fine people $5,000 for refusing to answer questions on the census. Was this a law that you enforced? Did you enforce this law and states that were over counted and states that were undercounted after the census?” Director of the Census Robert Santos “We’ve never enforced that” “So no one was fined. So there were overcounts”

Wall Street Apes

200,852 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sen. Hagerty on his legal rationale for not counting undocumented immigrants in the census: "There's a constitutional interpretation I think that has been misapplied that goes back to slavery days and what portion of a person is going to be counted."

Sen. Hagerty on his legal rationale for not counting undocumented immigrants in the census: "There's a constitutional interpretation I think that has been misapplied that goes back to slavery days and what portion of a person is going to be counted."

Aaron Rupar

375,493 просмотров • 1 год назад

Canada just passed six bills that when stacked together hand the government control over what you say online, who you talk to, and whether you can access the internet at all. Constitutional lawyer JohnCarpayJusticeCentre (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms ) breaks down exactly what Bills C-11, C-18, C-8, C-9, C-22, and C-34 actually do — and why "protecting children" is the cover story for building a surveillance state. No one, left or right, should be supporting this kind of gross government overreach. Anyone who supports these bills has either not read them, failed to learn from history, or does not grasp the severity of where structures like these can ultimately lead us. You can watch here or please see the links in the comments where you can help me grow this show by sharing and subscribing for free.

Canada just passed six bills that when stacked together hand the government control over what you say online, who you talk to, and whether you can access the internet at all. Constitutional lawyer JohnCarpayJusticeCentre (Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms ) breaks down exactly what Bills C-11, C-18, C-8, C-9, C-22, and C-34 actually do — and why "protecting children" is the cover story for building a surveillance state. No one, left or right, should be supporting this kind of gross government overreach. Anyone who supports these bills has either not read them, failed to learn from history, or does not grasp the severity of where structures like these can ultimately lead us. You can watch here or please see the links in the comments where you can help me grow this show by sharing and subscribing for free.

Karla Treadway | Host Sovereign Sphere Podcast

40,836 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO HEAR! 🚨🚨🚨 Did you know that we live in a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC here in America, NOT a “Democracy”??? I don’t care WHO tries to tell you otherwise, THEY ARE 💯 WRONG. We have ALL been purposely programmed, deceived, and subverted since we were young enough to start learning, that the United States is a democracy. Do you know WHY??? Because, you have been being programmed by COMMUNISTS who WANT America to be a democracy, so they can STRIP YOUR LIBERTIES & FREEDOMS. The Constitution requires a REPUBLICAN form of Government for ALL STATES, but does NOT mention “democracy” You will NOT find the word “democracy” in either our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, or our Bill of Rights. NOT ONCE. THE IDEAL OF A DEMOCRACY IS UNVERSAL EQUALITY. THE IDEAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC IS INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY. Being a DEMOCRAT IS LITERALLY A SUBVERSION of the way our Founding Fathers INTENDED for us be. FREE WITH INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY.

THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO HEAR! 🚨🚨🚨 Did you know that we live in a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC here in America, NOT a “Democracy”??? I don’t care WHO tries to tell you otherwise, THEY ARE 💯 WRONG. We have ALL been purposely programmed, deceived, and subverted since we were young enough to start learning, that the United States is a democracy. Do you know WHY??? Because, you have been being programmed by COMMUNISTS who WANT America to be a democracy, so they can STRIP YOUR LIBERTIES & FREEDOMS. The Constitution requires a REPUBLICAN form of Government for ALL STATES, but does NOT mention “democracy” You will NOT find the word “democracy” in either our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, or our Bill of Rights. NOT ONCE. THE IDEAL OF A DEMOCRACY IS UNVERSAL EQUALITY. THE IDEAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC IS INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY. Being a DEMOCRAT IS LITERALLY A SUBVERSION of the way our Founding Fathers INTENDED for us be. FREE WITH INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY.

The Patriot Voice

100,876 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨BREAKING: A masked ICE agent was caught on a surveillance camera trespassing through private backyards, with his taser drawn, in Pompano Beach, Florida. In the video, the masked agent can be seen walking through private backyards, searching each property’s patio, with his taser drawn… before walking away. And we need to stop normalizing this. The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires the government to have a warrant, consent, or a recognized exception before entering private property to conduct a search. Your backyard is still your private property. Your constitutional rights don’t disappear because the person walking onto your property is wearing a badge. And somehow, we’re being conditioned to see this as normal. IT IS NOT NORMAL. It should not be normal. Because if the government can just walk onto your private property, with weapons drawn, and expect you to accept it… we’re not talking about immigration enforcement anymore. We’re talking about a government that is no longer respecting the constitutional rights of the people it’s supposed to be protecting.

🚨BREAKING: A masked ICE agent was caught on a surveillance camera trespassing through private backyards, with his taser drawn, in Pompano Beach, Florida. In the video, the masked agent can be seen walking through private backyards, searching each property’s patio, with his taser drawn… before walking away. And we need to stop normalizing this. The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures, and requires the government to have a warrant, consent, or a recognized exception before entering private property to conduct a search. Your backyard is still your private property. Your constitutional rights don’t disappear because the person walking onto your property is wearing a badge. And somehow, we’re being conditioned to see this as normal. IT IS NOT NORMAL. It should not be normal. Because if the government can just walk onto your private property, with weapons drawn, and expect you to accept it… we’re not talking about immigration enforcement anymore. We’re talking about a government that is no longer respecting the constitutional rights of the people it’s supposed to be protecting.

Jesus Freakin Congress

97,373 просмотров • 6 дней назад

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

🚨🚨🚨"Democracy" is a Psyop!!! "You ask a hundred people on the street, what kind of government is America supposed to be? 99% of them will tell you, a democracy. America is supposed to be a democracy. But THAT'S A LIE. That's an illusion. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic, and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them. You have God given human rights that nobody can take away from you—the government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights. And that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules, you see? And they want you to believe that."

Red Pill USA

760,138 просмотров • 2 лет назад

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “If the 350,000 Temporary Protected Status holders right now start applying for permanent status, start applying for visas, will they not be deported? Is that a way for them to stay in the U.S. legal?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “Well, it depends on if they qualify or not. Underneath some visas, when you overstay your visa… you have to go back to the country you came from.” “There's a lot of things that take into consideration. First of all, have you been here and been charged with a felony, or do you have a criminal background? Do you have pending charges against you? Those won't be accepted.” “If you have been here and you have been living off the taxpayer dollars, meaning that you have you're part of social, those won't be accepted either. If you have been here and you have had a full-time paying job, under some circumstances, those would apply.” “But you have to go through the regular steps that every other immigrant that wants to come to the country legally has to go through.”

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “If the 350,000 Temporary Protected Status holders right now start applying for permanent status, start applying for visas, will they not be deported? Is that a way for them to stay in the U.S. legal?” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin: “Well, it depends on if they qualify or not. Underneath some visas, when you overstay your visa… you have to go back to the country you came from.” “There's a lot of things that take into consideration. First of all, have you been here and been charged with a felony, or do you have a criminal background? Do you have pending charges against you? Those won't be accepted.” “If you have been here and you have been living off the taxpayer dollars, meaning that you have you're part of social, those won't be accepted either. If you have been here and you have had a full-time paying job, under some circumstances, those would apply.” “But you have to go through the regular steps that every other immigrant that wants to come to the country legally has to go through.”

RedWave Press

204,904 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Did you know you could be charged up to $3k if you have to be rescued from Sleeping Bear Dunes at Lake Michigan? Basically enter and finish at your own risk, it is no joke! Hard to believe that is not an ocean.

Did you know you could be charged up to $3k if you have to be rescued from Sleeping Bear Dunes at Lake Michigan? Basically enter and finish at your own risk, it is no joke! Hard to believe that is not an ocean.

Richie Rich

287,233 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: “You’d think that if you’re going to be appointed as a judge, you have to have proven that you have an excellent knowledge of the law and that you will make your decisions according to the law. That’s what we assume should be a requirement. You’ve got to know what the law is, and then you need to make decisions in accordance with the law. Not vibes. You can’t be just vibing as a judge.”

Elon Musk: “You’d think that if you’re going to be appointed as a judge, you have to have proven that you have an excellent knowledge of the law and that you will make your decisions according to the law. That’s what we assume should be a requirement. You’ve got to know what the law is, and then you need to make decisions in accordance with the law. Not vibes. You can’t be just vibing as a judge.”

Mars University

13,099,183 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jersey City, I want to speak to you directly. We have confirmed reports that federal immigration enforcement is operating in our city. The videos are extremely disturbing—apparently including randomly picking up people on their way to work. What we can do right now is ensure every resident knows their rights: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: -> If ICE stops you in public: Ask if you are being detained/arrested. If they say no, you are free to walk away calmly. -> If ICE comes to your home or job: You do not have to open your door without a valid warrant signed by a judge. -> If you are detained: You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to contact a lawyer. -> If you witness a detention: You have the right to film, as long as you are not interfering. PREPARE TODAY: -> Memorize an emergency contact's phone number -> Have a childcare plan if you are detained -> Keep important documents somewhere safe and accessible I signed an Executive Order strengthening Jersey City's immigration protections. No city property will be used for federal immigration operations. Our employees are trained to protect your rights. You belong here. This is your home. Jersey City has your back.

Jersey City, I want to speak to you directly. We have confirmed reports that federal immigration enforcement is operating in our city. The videos are extremely disturbing—apparently including randomly picking up people on their way to work. What we can do right now is ensure every resident knows their rights: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: -> If ICE stops you in public: Ask if you are being detained/arrested. If they say no, you are free to walk away calmly. -> If ICE comes to your home or job: You do not have to open your door without a valid warrant signed by a judge. -> If you are detained: You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to contact a lawyer. -> If you witness a detention: You have the right to film, as long as you are not interfering. PREPARE TODAY: -> Memorize an emergency contact's phone number -> Have a childcare plan if you are detained -> Keep important documents somewhere safe and accessible I signed an Executive Order strengthening Jersey City's immigration protections. No city property will be used for federal immigration operations. Our employees are trained to protect your rights. You belong here. This is your home. Jersey City has your back.

James Solomon

56,920 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Why do you think the government would want to ask seniors, if they have a mortgage on their home and what their monthly expenses are? 🤔 And also asking for health conditions, sexual orientation & gender identity. Makes sense why Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is filing a Constitutional challenges

Why do you think the government would want to ask seniors, if they have a mortgage on their home and what their monthly expenses are? 🤔 And also asking for health conditions, sexual orientation & gender identity. Makes sense why Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is filing a Constitutional challenges

Mario Zelaya

42,910 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Joel Hellermark: If you could have a billion Deutsch-level intelligences, wouldn't that be a massive advantage for humanity? David Deutsch: I think having two might be an advantage. I mean, people, there's the law of comparative advantage says that the more different you are from other people, the more valuable you are economically. That suggests that if you have an exact clone of you, you're almost not at all more economically valuable than just one of you. You know, you'll be competing with each other for the same job. You wanted a unique job, your perfect dream job, and now it's the perfect dream job of a billion other AGIs, you know, in your conception. I don't think it can be like that. People are valuable because they are different. Everybody is unfathomably different from everyone else. That fact is not being harnessed enough and can be harnessed more.

.Joel Hellermark: If you could have a billion Deutsch-level intelligences, wouldn't that be a massive advantage for humanity? David Deutsch: I think having two might be an advantage. I mean, people, there's the law of comparative advantage says that the more different you are from other people, the more valuable you are economically. That suggests that if you have an exact clone of you, you're almost not at all more economically valuable than just one of you. You know, you'll be competing with each other for the same job. You wanted a unique job, your perfect dream job, and now it's the perfect dream job of a billion other AGIs, you know, in your conception. I don't think it can be like that. People are valuable because they are different. Everybody is unfathomably different from everyone else. That fact is not being harnessed enough and can be harnessed more.

Deutsch Explains

34,490 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

"You have to practice and play and behave like a winner if you want to win games. It is not just something that you can decide to be. You have to be that every single day in your approach and in your execution."

"You have to practice and play and behave like a winner if you want to win games. It is not just something that you can decide to be. You have to be that every single day in your approach and in your execution."

The Winning Difference

27,697 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад