Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨🚨 A cybersecurity professional taking down a drone which is flying by writing and running a python script Is it "Absolutely Possible"? ​Yes, this is entirely possible in the real world, and cybersecurity researchers demonstrate it frequently. Most commercial or consumer drones rely on radio frequencies (RF), Wi-Fi, or...

694,900 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce •via TikTok

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

You do not need an RF jammer or a cyber exploit to knock a drone out of the sky. In 2015, security researchers proved that playing an 8.2 kHz sound wave at an unprotected flight controller forces it to drop instantaneously. This is an acoustic resonance attack, and it exploits a mechanical vulnerability in the micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) inside consumer gyroscopes and hard drives. 1. The anatomy of a vibrating silicon spring Inside a drone's flight controller sits an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). The core of that IMU is a MEMS gyroscope measuring less than four millimeters across. Inside the chip, a microscopic silicon proof mass is suspended above a substrate by silicon micro-springs. The internal drive circuit vibrates this mass back and forth at a known drive frequency. When the drone rotates along its pitch, roll, or yaw axis, the Coriolis force deflects the proof mass toward fixed capacitive comb fingers. The deflection shifts the electrical capacitance by fractions of a femtofarad. The chip's analog front-end converts this capacitance change into voltage, feeds it through an Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC), and passes raw angular rates to the flight controller over SPI or I2C. 2. The 8.2 kHz acoustic exploit Every physical structure suspended on micro-springs has a mechanical resonant frequency. In a 2015 USENIX Security study, researchers tested 15 commercial MEMS gyroscopes. Seven were vulnerable to acoustic resonance. Gyroscopes from STMicroelectronics (like the L3G4200D) resonated in the audible band between 2.5 kHz and 8.2 kHz along their X and Y sensing axes. When airborne sound matches that mechanical resonant frequency, the acoustic energy transfers directly into the silicon lattice. The proof mass vibrates with severe physical amplitude. The sensing comb fingers saturate the ADC to its maximum railing limits, feeding false angular rates into the flight controller. 3. Why the drone drops The drone's flight controller runs a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) loop at 500 Hz to 1,000 Hz to maintain level flight. When sound noise at 8.2 kHz hit the gyroscope, the sensor reported massive erratic rotation spikes. The PID control loop immediately tried to counteract rotation that did not exist. In real-world flight trials, the controller responded by throttling motors to their minimum and maximum limits simultaneously. The drone lost balance and dropped to the ground instantaneously on all 20 test flights. 4. The same physics in the datacenter In 2018, researchers at Michigan and Zhejiang demonstrated the same physical failure mode on enterprise hard disk drives. In a mechanical hard drive, the read/write head floats on an air bearing less than 10 nanometers above spinning magnetic platters, with track widths narrower than 75 nanometers. Playing an audible 5.0 kHz tone at 115.3 dB SPL caused tracking errors on Western Digital drives. Pumping that tone to 117.2 dB SPL forced off-track vibrations so severe that the drive firmware halted all write operations to prevent physical head crashes on the platters. With sustained acoustic noise, operating systems experienced complete I/O timeouts, remounting ext4 file systems as read-only. 5. The physical constraints and modern defenses Acoustic attacks have clear physical limitations: * Inverse square law: In the drone flight trials, researchers attached a small speaker 10 cm directly above the flight controller at 113 dB SPL. Projecting that sound pressure over 30 meters would require a 140 dB directional acoustic device (LRAD). * Axis isolation: Modern InvenSense gyroscopes resonate in the ultrasonic range (above 26 kHz) along the Z-axis only, which flight software easily counteracts by cross-checking magnetometer yaw data. * Mechanical dampening: Wrapping the IMU in dense silicone grommets or acoustic foam blocks airborne sound pressure before it hits the silicon package. * Asymmetric dual-IMU fusion: Pairing two gyroscopes with mismatched mechanical resonant frequencies (such as 8 kHz and 26 kHz) allows flight software to identify and drop the saturated outlier. Software algorithms cannot filter a corrupted sensor measurement if the silicon spring itself is physically vibrating.

Zoe

53,441 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

Fieldwatch 1.1.14 Update Fieldwatch listens for nearby Wi-Fi and Bluetooth signals and identifies the devices sending them, such as tracker tags, body cameras, drones and in-car Wi-Fi. It does this using a list of device signatures you can edit in the app. You can get an alert when a specific device type or address shows up, and you can record a session in one place or along a drive, then compare it with later visits. Fieldwatch can also spot devices that seem to be moving with you and build reports from everything it picked up. What’s new: See where you’ve been. The Reports screen now draws your route as you drive, the last 15 minutes or a full session. Stops show as green, flagged devices as red, and bookmarks as blue. Each device gets one numbered marker at its strongest signal. With online maps on and Privacy mode off, the route sits on a street map. Otherwise it’s a plain line. Video (sped up) shows a path that updates every few seconds as you drive. It’s on the Reports tab. Better PDF reports. Debrief and Compare PDFs now include that same map. Sessions, explained. A session (a "sit" in the app) is a named stretch of time and the devices heard during it. Session export lists each device once. Log export is the full running record. Drone detection. Fieldwatch now reads Remote ID, the digital license plate most drones broadcast, over Bluetooth and Wi-Fi (Android 11+ for Wi-Fi). In TAK mapping apps, each drone shows as one moving marker, with a second marker for the pilot. It works best when a drone hovers nearby. More accurate identification. Google Find Hub trackers, readable tire pressure sensors (including Teslas while awake), Flock's battery pack and gunshot microphone, and Axon body cameras are all identified more reliably. Smart glasses from Meta, Snap and Vuzix are still flagged. You can update the device signature catelog from GitHub when you're online. Signature catalog 81 can now identify up to 242 types of devices. Bug Fixed: A signal strength of 127 means Bluetooth couldn't measure it, not that the device is close, so hunting mode and shared reports now ignore it.

Off Grid Pete

25,454 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce