Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
A fired Goldman Sachs quant trader taught me everything in a single conversation He said: “We don’t do predictions. We only buy contracts where the price deviation exceeds 6%.” It’s just that simple That’s the desk operation for a $2 million annual salary I fed his explanation and 5... show more
125,497 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
28 Kommentare

esse sharpe de 2.30 com 99 trades é ruido estatístico, não edge. precisa de anos de dados pra separar sorte de skill. e se o "true probability" fosse realmente calculável, o mercado já teria corrigido. preço reflete informação, não deixa dinheiro fácil na mesa.

scam!!! Selling this story to other people can make money — for whoever's selling it. Trading on it yourself is very likely to lose money, especially if it involves connecting a wallet, funding an account through a link, or paying for "the bot."

Congrats on your bullsh*t: Implausible (90%+ confidence this is false): 1.81% win rate sustained over 99 trades in 3 months. This is either selection bias (cherry-picked wins) or overfitting. Professional traders at sophisticated firms average 50-55% win rates. An 81% rate would be Medallion Fund–tier performance (which requires decades of R&D and $10B+ capital). A 3-month sample with 99 trades is statistically insignificant. 2.Sharpe ratio 2.30. Top-decile hedge funds aspire to Sharpe 2.0+. This claim suggests returns outpacing volatility at a level that would make the author literally wealthier than any active fund manager in history if sustained. 3.409% return in 3 months ($2k → $8k+). Annualized: ~1,600% return. If real and repeatable, this is the most profitable strategy ever documented. There is zero evidence. If it existed, the author would have $2B AUM, not a $25/month setup. 4.“400 markets every hour” on Claude $20/month. Claude’s rate limits and API costs don’t support this volume. The math fails. 5.Copy-trading angle. If the bot genuinely printed 409% annual returns, why publicize it via copy-trading referrals instead of managing it privately or raising capital?

hahaha love this bullshit

@grok Is this post true? This post looks cryptic, explain this in simple terms

Another bullshit post

Claude

These numbers contradict themselves. Fake news!

Claude

Why was he fired? was he too awesome?

Claude

CLAUDE

@polash_ai Claude

Claude

Only Claude?

Claude

CLAUDE

Claude

409% in three months with an 81% win rate and a 2.30 Sharpe isn’t evidence that institutional alpha suddenly costs $25/month. It’s evidence that the methodology needs auditing. The interesting AI story is real: sophisticated market research is getting cheaper.

Claude

CLAUDE

@zakiraicoder Claude

Claude

CLAUDE

Claude

Claude

Claude

CLAUDE
