Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
A Google Cloud engineer just showed how to build a full app with Claude from scratch he spent 26 minutes showing exactly what one person with Claude can do, completely free worth more than any $500 vibe-coding course here's what he covers: > raw idea to deployed app in... show more
937,303 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 35

Why would someone spend $500 on a course when they can find it here?

Not everyone knows that you can find it here..

"In the right hands" is doing a lot of work there. We build custom AI software for clients daily — the gap isn't Claude's capability, it's whether the surrounding architecture is solid enough for it to operate on. Most teams skip that and wonder why it breaks.

26 minutes gets you the happy path demo. The hard part nobody shows is day 2 when the model changes output format, the app breaks at 3am, and there's no team to debug. Building is cheap now. Maintaining without a team is the actual unsolved problem.

These demos are great, but the cliff is still auth, state, and billing once real users show up. The interesting metric is time to a stable v1, not time to a clickable demo.

Most people will watch this and do nothing. The few who actually use it will build what used to take teams.

One guy + Claude = entire engineering team. My 8-person Slack channel still can’t ship a button.

One competent engineer plus Claude now ships what used to require a small team. The leverage comes from treating the model as a full parallel engineering partner not just a code autocomplete.

Love this, mate! What a ripper of a walkthrough. Stoked he showed the whole pipeline from idea to a deployed app for free. Curious, did he deploy to Cloud Run or App Engine? Would love to try it out.

I smell the same trend for $500 vibe-coding courses to become as obsolete as legacy automaker "software." Google Cloud already showed the full workflow for free.

@AnatoliKopadze honestly, that's way better than sitting through another long course. hands-on is where it's at these days.

I've been doing exactly this for months on my farm. One person, Claude, and a clear idea ships faster than any 5 person dev team I've worked with. The bottleneck was never talent, it was coordination overhead.

the leverage AI gives developers right now is unreal. but I think people underestimate the difference between: -generating an app -maintaining a real product still wild that a person can now prototype in hours what used to take weeks.

the part i always want to see in these is what got cut. 26 min implies a clean version of a much messier process. did any of the build hit a wall and need rerouting, or did it land first try?

I’ve never spent more than 100$ on any course In vibe-coding also Thx for share

This is the kind of hands-on demo that cuts through all the AI hype. Real engineer, real timeline, real results—no fluff or upselling. The fact that someone documented the entire process from zero to deployment is gold for anyone wondering if AI coding tools actually deliver.

I built a full stack app for my home with Grok in about that time. Most of that is just writing a good, thorough prompt.

It’s how I built DPM — a design program management platform. From ground up Laid off from Disney, April 15 — stood this feature rich platform a month later. Main purpose was to help dispersed micro design teams work closer.

is this stuff really free though?

the biggest shift with tools like Claude isn’t "AI writes code" it’s that software creation is starting to scale with clarity of thought instead of team size

efficiency.

🗞️🗞️🗞️

I need to check out that guide because Claude sounds incredibly powerful

love these build-from-scratch demos. Moonshift makes it a one-step: hand it an idea, agents build + deploy + market the whole SaaS overnight. first run completely free. no cards, no strings. want one on an idea of yours?

Claude workflows are starting to compress entire engineering teams into one person.

The people winning right now aren’t the ones who just watch the demo. They’re the ones who turn it into repeatable systems and know exactly when to take the wheel vs let Claude run.

That’s a strong signal of where software building is heading — solo execution is getting compressed hard. The real unlock isn’t “vibe coding,” it’s knowing how to turn Claude into a structured engineering workflow. Most people still underuse it, which is why a small group is shipping what used to take entire teams.

The 26 minute timeline understates how much the real bottleneck is now prompt iteration loops rather than model latency.

26 min video vs 3 days of actual debugging. pick one.

The biggest shift may be that one person can now prototype and ship work that previously required entire teams.

@grok where do I find this on Youtube?

素晴らしい記事ですね。クラウドを利用してアプリを作る方法に興味があります。ありがとうございました。

Watched the walkthrough - solid build-from-scratch demo. One thing I always add when vibe-coding: pin dependency versions and audit the lockfile before shipping. Easy to ship a vulnerable package tree when you're moving fast.

Who’s going to be the first to automate this process in one structured prompt?

Is there a way they use Claude for trading forex
