Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A guy was sitting in a trader chat complaining for the 3rd month straight about his results being basically zero Someone dropped him a link to a wallet 1 bot, $47K in a month, 860 trades per week. He asked: is this even legal? They replied: this is public...

browomo's profile picture

Blaze

9,646 subscribers

36,941 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Anthropic released an update for Claude, and one young guy turned $1,400 into $238,000 in 11 days His account is 0xdE17. He is not a trader. Not a developer. Just a student with a laptop and access to Claude. When Anthropic updated the skills architecture for Claude, he didn’t sleep for two nights, read the documentation, and built a bot from scratch. Result: $1,430 → $238,006 in 11 days 366 trades. Win rate 62%. The biggest win $52,700 on a single bet. How it works: The bot scans Polymarket every few seconds looking for markets where the price deviates from the fair value by more than 8%. That’s the edge. Most people don’t see it the bot always does. The strategy is painfully simple - The market says 30¢ for an event - The real probability based on data is 55¢ - The bot enters. Waits. Exits at the peak. This isn’t luck. It’s attention arbitrage. The biggest trade was a bet that Trump would sign a crypto executive order in March. The market priced it at 28¢. The bot placed $16,000. Exited at 81¢. In 11 days he went through a journey most traders don’t go through in years. Now his wallet is public, and with the help of this terminal you will be able to copy his trades in time: Bot 0xdE17 CLAWD BTC SNIPER is open for copy-trade. People ask him: “How much starting capital do you need?” He replied: “I had $1,400 and a sleepless night.” Anthropic gave the tool. He simply wasn’t afraid to use it.
1:01

Anthropic released an update for Claude, and one young guy turned $1,400 into $238,000 in 11 days His account is 0xdE17. He is not a trader. Not a developer. Just a student with a laptop and access to Claude. When Anthropic updated the skills architecture for Claude, he didn’t sleep for two nights, read the documentation, and built a bot from scratch. Result: $1,430 → $238,006 in 11 days 366 trades. Win rate 62%. The biggest win $52,700 on a single bet. How it works: The bot scans Polymarket every few seconds looking for markets where the price deviates from the fair value by more than 8%. That’s the edge. Most people don’t see it the bot always does. The strategy is painfully simple - The market says 30¢ for an event - The real probability based on data is 55¢ - The bot enters. Waits. Exits at the peak. This isn’t luck. It’s attention arbitrage. The biggest trade was a bet that Trump would sign a crypto executive order in March. The market priced it at 28¢. The bot placed $16,000. Exited at 81¢. In 11 days he went through a journey most traders don’t go through in years. Now his wallet is public, and with the help of this terminal you will be able to copy his trades in time: Bot 0xdE17 CLAWD BTC SNIPER is open for copy-trade. People ask him: “How much starting capital do you need?” He replied: “I had $1,400 and a sleepless night.” Anthropic gave the tool. He simply wasn’t afraid to use it.

AdiiX

1,765,736 views • 5 months ago

If you think you need a big bankroll for a Polymarket bot - this guy made $160,000 with an average bet size of just $200. If you think you need to predict the future to run a profitable Polymarket bot - this guy makes money with pure mathematics. If you think it’s cap - every trade is on-chain, go check it yourself. Bot wallet: He doesn’t care where the price of BTC is going. All he does is methodically extract edge from the numbers. Both YES and NO shares will always be worth exactly $1 at market expiration. But are they worth exactly $1 while the market is still open? The answer is no. For example: YES at 70¢ + NO at 25¢ = 95¢ total. That 5¢ gap is free money. Repeat it ten thousand times.+$166,000 in two months. His active bankroll never exceeded a $10k, and risk per trade stayed at $200–300 the entire time. Mathematical. Methodical. Almost zero risk. This is how you actually get to the top of the leaderboard - not by guessing the future, but by exploiting inefficiencies. Want the full guide on how to build one? Save the post and read the article. Want to start copying the trades of a ready-made bot right now? Use this copy-trading solution:
0:30

If you think you need a big bankroll for a Polymarket bot - this guy made $160,000 with an average bet size of just $200. If you think you need to predict the future to run a profitable Polymarket bot - this guy makes money with pure mathematics. If you think it’s cap - every trade is on-chain, go check it yourself. Bot wallet: He doesn’t care where the price of BTC is going. All he does is methodically extract edge from the numbers. Both YES and NO shares will always be worth exactly $1 at market expiration. But are they worth exactly $1 while the market is still open? The answer is no. For example: YES at 70¢ + NO at 25¢ = 95¢ total. That 5¢ gap is free money. Repeat it ten thousand times.+$166,000 in two months. His active bankroll never exceeded a $10k, and risk per trade stayed at $200–300 the entire time. Mathematical. Methodical. Almost zero risk. This is how you actually get to the top of the leaderboard - not by guessing the future, but by exploiting inefficiencies. Want the full guide on how to build one? Save the post and read the article. Want to start copying the trades of a ready-made bot right now? Use this copy-trading solution:

cvxv666

48,661 views • 4 months ago

Elon's Grok Bot runs an entire trading desk for $300 a month. The person who does that job at Goldman starts at $200,000. Mine took $1,000 to $3,900 on day one, out of a wallet anyone can open and read. Most of the build is not about making it trade. It is about stopping it. Every agent's job description ends with a list of what it may never do without asking me first. One of the six is not allowed to trade at all. Its entire job is killing what the other five found, and its no beats every score on the desk. The one that makes the final call never touches the market either. You could have this running by Friday. Most people reading this will not, and in a few months they will be paying somebody who did. The whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it while it still sounds strange. Give it a quarter and this is just how a retail account works.
0:45

Elon's Grok Bot runs an entire trading desk for $300 a month. The person who does that job at Goldman starts at $200,000. Mine took $1,000 to $3,900 on day one, out of a wallet anyone can open and read. Most of the build is not about making it trade. It is about stopping it. Every agent's job description ends with a list of what it may never do without asking me first. One of the six is not allowed to trade at all. Its entire job is killing what the other five found, and its no beats every score on the desk. The one that makes the final call never touches the market either. You could have this running by Friday. Most people reading this will not, and in a few months they will be paying somebody who did. The whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it while it still sounds strange. Give it a quarter and this is just how a retail account works.

cvxv666

205,565 views • 6 days ago

A 33-year-old quant from Hong Kong built a perfect BTC price simulation engine with a swarm of agents. In a single trade, he turned $2,000 into $166,000. 7,500% profit. All proof onchain - every single one of his trades is publicly visible on Polymarket. His wallet: Humans can’t process dozens of gigabytes of data in seconds - but Claude can. Closed order book feeds from CEXs, live data from OTC trading desks, Pyth oracles - AI agent gathers all of it in one iteration. His algorithm instantly detects any mispricing in crypto markets and enters trade immediately. $369,000 all-time profit. Constantly fading the crowd because his simulation reads the market better than everyone else. On April 24, he was only one who knew the market was wrong. He entered a trade with just a 1.3% implied probability of execution. This isn’t "guessing where the chart will go" This is engineered money. Pure fusion of AI + MiroFish + insane math on exclusive data. Want the full guide to build the same bot? Save the post and read the article. Want to start copying his trades right now? Use this TG copy-trading bot (US users can actually trade here, unlike the main Polymarket site):
0:56

A 33-year-old quant from Hong Kong built a perfect BTC price simulation engine with a swarm of agents. In a single trade, he turned $2,000 into $166,000. 7,500% profit. All proof onchain - every single one of his trades is publicly visible on Polymarket. His wallet: Humans can’t process dozens of gigabytes of data in seconds - but Claude can. Closed order book feeds from CEXs, live data from OTC trading desks, Pyth oracles - AI agent gathers all of it in one iteration. His algorithm instantly detects any mispricing in crypto markets and enters trade immediately. $369,000 all-time profit. Constantly fading the crowd because his simulation reads the market better than everyone else. On April 24, he was only one who knew the market was wrong. He entered a trade with just a 1.3% implied probability of execution. This isn’t "guessing where the chart will go" This is engineered money. Pure fusion of AI + MiroFish + insane math on exclusive data. Want the full guide to build the same bot? Save the post and read the article. Want to start copying his trades right now? Use this TG copy-trading bot (US users can actually trade here, unlike the main Polymarket site):

cvxv666

83,208 views • 3 months ago

This is Anagha Rajesh. And she is crazy. She wants to store data in bacterial DNA. Her startup is called BioCompute. And last year, they actually did it. They stored data in DNA and retrieved it in their tiny lab in Bengaluru. This is a huge moment. But why is she even doing it? Because DNA is the ultimate storage tool available to us. Just 1 gm of DNA can store about 215 petabytes of data - that's like storing over 2 million movies in 4K. On top of that - this data can last for literally 1000s of years. Right now, they still need to figure out a way to make the reading and writing process faster and cheaper. But if BioCompute solves this problem - we could theoretically store all the data created in the world every year in the palm of our hands. And that would be insane. P.S. Check out this video from vyom going to Anagha's lab and actually doing it.
0:21

This is Anagha Rajesh. And she is crazy. She wants to store data in bacterial DNA. Her startup is called BioCompute. And last year, they actually did it. They stored data in DNA and retrieved it in their tiny lab in Bengaluru. This is a huge moment. But why is she even doing it? Because DNA is the ultimate storage tool available to us. Just 1 gm of DNA can store about 215 petabytes of data - that's like storing over 2 million movies in 4K. On top of that - this data can last for literally 1000s of years. Right now, they still need to figure out a way to make the reading and writing process faster and cheaper. But if BioCompute solves this problem - we could theoretically store all the data created in the world every year in the palm of our hands. And that would be insane. P.S. Check out this video from vyom going to Anagha's lab and actually doing it.

Varun Guru

255,157 views • 2 months ago

A bot pulled $294K in one month with something I have never seen a 100% win rate. I scrolled through 5,000 trades looking for one loss. Could not find it. 100%. Not 99.5. Not "almost perfect." Actual, literal, every single trade green. CRYINGLITTLEBABY does not play the same game as other bots. They enter at the start of a window, read momentum, guess direction. This one waits. → Account: The 15-minute BTC window opens. He watches. Does nothing. Five minutes pass. BTC drops hard on spot. The move is real. But Polymarket still shows DOWN at 25 cents. Now he enters. The bet is not "will BTC go down?" The bet is "BTC already went down and the odds have not caught up yet." By the time the window closes, he is paid $1 for something he bought at 20-30 cents. Not because he predicted anything. Because he waited until predicting was unnecessary. The treemap broke my brain a little. Solid green. A full month of trading and not one red tile. I kept scrolling thinking I would find it hiding somewhere. Nothing. The edge is patience. Other bots race to enter first. This one lets them fight, watches the result, and collects what is left. A month of trading. Zero losses. Just a wall of green proving that sometimes the best prediction is no prediction at all.
1:07

A bot pulled $294K in one month with something I have never seen a 100% win rate. I scrolled through 5,000 trades looking for one loss. Could not find it. 100%. Not 99.5. Not "almost perfect." Actual, literal, every single trade green. CRYINGLITTLEBABY does not play the same game as other bots. They enter at the start of a window, read momentum, guess direction. This one waits. → Account: The 15-minute BTC window opens. He watches. Does nothing. Five minutes pass. BTC drops hard on spot. The move is real. But Polymarket still shows DOWN at 25 cents. Now he enters. The bet is not "will BTC go down?" The bet is "BTC already went down and the odds have not caught up yet." By the time the window closes, he is paid $1 for something he bought at 20-30 cents. Not because he predicted anything. Because he waited until predicting was unnecessary. The treemap broke my brain a little. Solid green. A full month of trading and not one red tile. I kept scrolling thinking I would find it hiding somewhere. Nothing. The edge is patience. Other bots race to enter first. This one lets them fight, watches the result, and collects what is left. A month of trading. Zero losses. Just a wall of green proving that sometimes the best prediction is no prediction at all.

Blaze

272,625 views • 8 months ago

IN 1986 MIT FILMED THE LECTURE WHERE CODE STOPPED BEING CODE AND BECAME DATA 43 minutes from Gerald Sussman, in the most legendary intro programming course ever recorded. -> The idea that lands: to a program, your code is just data it can read and rewrite. He builds a program that does real calculus -- not by crunching numbers, but by reading the math as a list and transforming it piece by piece. Then he shows the trick hiding under all of it: in this language, code and data are the same material. Forty years later that is exactly what an AI coding agent is -- a program that reads your code as data, rewrites it, and hands it back. Sussman drew the whole idea on a blackboard in 1986. Writing code was never the deepest skill -- understanding that code itself is data a program can manipulate is. This is where you learn it. Most people think AI writing code is brand new. The ones who watch this saw the blueprint 40 years ago. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓
43:30

IN 1986 MIT FILMED THE LECTURE WHERE CODE STOPPED BEING CODE AND BECAME DATA 43 minutes from Gerald Sussman, in the most legendary intro programming course ever recorded. -> The idea that lands: to a program, your code is just data it can read and rewrite. He builds a program that does real calculus -- not by crunching numbers, but by reading the math as a list and transforming it piece by piece. Then he shows the trick hiding under all of it: in this language, code and data are the same material. Forty years later that is exactly what an AI coding agent is -- a program that reads your code as data, rewrites it, and hands it back. Sussman drew the whole idea on a blackboard in 1986. Writing code was never the deepest skill -- understanding that code itself is data a program can manipulate is. This is where you learn it. Most people think AI writing code is brand new. The ones who watch this saw the blueprint 40 years ago. Bookmark & Watch it. This one's a legend ↓

slash1s

22,107 views • 2 months ago

My wife's accountant called yesterday. Asked where the micropayments of $12 to $87 are coming from, hitting the account every 15 minutes, around the clock. First question: Is this legal? How much per month? There was no third question. He asked for the link. Three months ago I lost $1,800 on Polymarket in one week. I was betting on politics, trusting my gut, down every single night. My wife said either you stop or I am calling my mother. I did not stop. I stopped trading myself and started studying the people who trade better. On Polymarket every trade is on the blockchain. Every wallet, every entry, every exit. I expected to find a genius with a secret strategy. Instead I found a wallet that does the same thing every 15 minutes and makes more than I make in a month. His strategy is so simple that I felt embarrassed for not noticing it sooner. When BTC makes a sharp move, contracts on Polymarket update with a few seconds of delay. Two contracts that together should cost a dollar suddenly cost 40 to 60 cents. This wallet buys both, waits 15 minutes, and collects a dollar. It does not need to know where BTC is going. It just needs to catch the moment when the market blinks. For two weeks I just watched. Every morning I opened the profile. Up again. Occasionally down, but against the bigger picture it was like a scratch on the hood of a new Mercedes. Then I thought: enough standing outside the window watching people eat. Here is the profile, you can break down the history yourself: After a month I had so many micropayments coming in that the accountant noticed. He went quiet for a second and said: "So you are not trading. You are copying someone who trades math, not the market." For two years I was looking for a complicated strategy. The most profitable one turned out to be so simple it is almost insulting. I could have started two years earlier. One thing changed. I stopped thinking I am smarter than the market.
0:20

My wife's accountant called yesterday. Asked where the micropayments of $12 to $87 are coming from, hitting the account every 15 minutes, around the clock. First question: Is this legal? How much per month? There was no third question. He asked for the link. Three months ago I lost $1,800 on Polymarket in one week. I was betting on politics, trusting my gut, down every single night. My wife said either you stop or I am calling my mother. I did not stop. I stopped trading myself and started studying the people who trade better. On Polymarket every trade is on the blockchain. Every wallet, every entry, every exit. I expected to find a genius with a secret strategy. Instead I found a wallet that does the same thing every 15 minutes and makes more than I make in a month. His strategy is so simple that I felt embarrassed for not noticing it sooner. When BTC makes a sharp move, contracts on Polymarket update with a few seconds of delay. Two contracts that together should cost a dollar suddenly cost 40 to 60 cents. This wallet buys both, waits 15 minutes, and collects a dollar. It does not need to know where BTC is going. It just needs to catch the moment when the market blinks. For two weeks I just watched. Every morning I opened the profile. Up again. Occasionally down, but against the bigger picture it was like a scratch on the hood of a new Mercedes. Then I thought: enough standing outside the window watching people eat. Here is the profile, you can break down the history yourself: After a month I had so many micropayments coming in that the accountant noticed. He went quiet for a second and said: "So you are not trading. You are copying someone who trades math, not the market." For two years I was looking for a complicated strategy. The most profitable one turned out to be so simple it is almost insulting. I could have started two years earlier. One thing changed. I stopped thinking I am smarter than the market.

Blaze

65,698 views • 6 months ago

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”
0:51

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”

RedWave Press

54,599 views • 9 months ago

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 views • 8 months ago

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about government and AI. Musk: “AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more.” Not slightly ahead. Not a few years out in front. Ten times faster. And pulling away. Every regulatory body on earth runs on the same architecture. Committees form. Hearings are scheduled. Legislation is drafted, debated, revised, and passed. By the time a law exists, the thing it was written to govern has already moved three generations beyond it. That architecture was built for a world that moves at human speed. This world does not. Musk: “The one thing that the government can do is just issue people money.” Not regulate. Not protect. Not steer. Issue money. That is not a policy position. That is a surrender. The most powerful governments on earth, sitting on top of the most sophisticated legal and military infrastructure in human history, reduced to a single remaining function. Sending people checks. Because they cannot move fast enough to do anything else. Now sit with what that actually means. For ten thousand years, the central bargain of civilization was simple. You contribute labor. Society functions. You eat. The system needed you. That bargain is being quietly retired. The machine does not need you to run the factory. Does not need you to process the paperwork. Does not need you to write the code or drive the truck or staff the call center. And the government already knows it. Musk: “Nobody’s gonna starve is what I’m saying.” He is right. The floor is rising. Survival is becoming guaranteed. That should feel like the finish line. For most of human history, it would have been. But here is what nobody is saying out loud. The hard part was never survival. The hard part is what happens to a species that spent ten millennia being defined by its need to survive, the moment that need disappears. Purpose is not something the government can deposit into your account. A check covers rent. It does not answer the question of what you are for. When the thing that organized your days, justified your effort, and gave your life a legible shape gets handed to a machine, you do not automatically inherit freedom. You inherit a void. And a void with a guaranteed income is still a void. The people who will matter in this era are not the ones who cash the check and wait. They are the ones who hear the starting gun in it. For the first time in history, the baseline is solved. Which means the only question left is the one every generation before yours was too buried to ask. What are you actually here to build.
0:46

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about government and AI. Musk: “AI is moving 10 times faster than government, maybe more.” Not slightly ahead. Not a few years out in front. Ten times faster. And pulling away. Every regulatory body on earth runs on the same architecture. Committees form. Hearings are scheduled. Legislation is drafted, debated, revised, and passed. By the time a law exists, the thing it was written to govern has already moved three generations beyond it. That architecture was built for a world that moves at human speed. This world does not. Musk: “The one thing that the government can do is just issue people money.” Not regulate. Not protect. Not steer. Issue money. That is not a policy position. That is a surrender. The most powerful governments on earth, sitting on top of the most sophisticated legal and military infrastructure in human history, reduced to a single remaining function. Sending people checks. Because they cannot move fast enough to do anything else. Now sit with what that actually means. For ten thousand years, the central bargain of civilization was simple. You contribute labor. Society functions. You eat. The system needed you. That bargain is being quietly retired. The machine does not need you to run the factory. Does not need you to process the paperwork. Does not need you to write the code or drive the truck or staff the call center. And the government already knows it. Musk: “Nobody’s gonna starve is what I’m saying.” He is right. The floor is rising. Survival is becoming guaranteed. That should feel like the finish line. For most of human history, it would have been. But here is what nobody is saying out loud. The hard part was never survival. The hard part is what happens to a species that spent ten millennia being defined by its need to survive, the moment that need disappears. Purpose is not something the government can deposit into your account. A check covers rent. It does not answer the question of what you are for. When the thing that organized your days, justified your effort, and gave your life a legible shape gets handed to a machine, you do not automatically inherit freedom. You inherit a void. And a void with a guaranteed income is still a void. The people who will matter in this era are not the ones who cash the check and wait. They are the ones who hear the starting gun in it. For the first time in history, the baseline is solved. Which means the only question left is the one every generation before yours was too buried to ask. What are you actually here to build.

Dustin

63,328 views • 5 months ago

Threadguy says there’s no other corner of the internet where people livestream themselves making $1,000,000 a month “The crypto onchain crowd, the Hyperliquid wallets, the guys like Flood, the guys that watch our stream and are in here every day, make more money than anyone” “It is now really for the first time verifiable” “Stanley Druckenmiller is making more money than Cented, obviously, by a ridiculous margin but he’s not streaming it” “I don’t care what you think of his methods, the way that he does it, the way he approaches the markets, the style, the low cap” “This guy has livestreamed himself making a million dollars in a month. Every trade, every click. There’s no other pocket of the internet where that exists” “Think about that for a second. Livestreaming himself making $1,000,000 in a month” “Nobody is able to do this except for this little pocket on CT”
1:24

Threadguy says there’s no other corner of the internet where people livestream themselves making $1,000,000 a month “The crypto onchain crowd, the Hyperliquid wallets, the guys like Flood, the guys that watch our stream and are in here every day, make more money than anyone” “It is now really for the first time verifiable” “Stanley Druckenmiller is making more money than Cented, obviously, by a ridiculous margin but he’s not streaming it” “I don’t care what you think of his methods, the way that he does it, the way he approaches the markets, the style, the low cap” “This guy has livestreamed himself making a million dollars in a month. Every trade, every click. There’s no other pocket of the internet where that exists” “Think about that for a second. Livestreaming himself making $1,000,000 in a month” “Nobody is able to do this except for this little pocket on CT”

Jack

131,312 views • 9 days ago

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on the data center build-out and how America is holding itself back: "What's happening literally in the US right now county by county with the ability to build data centers is profoundly destructive." "And that's entirely domestic. And a large number of politicians are feeding that hysteria as much as they possibly can." "A lot of our leading public figures, and a lot of intellectuals, and a lot of the press, and a lot of the analysts, and the rest of it, it's just this kind of hyper paranoia about building data centers and the consequences of data centers." "This completely fake meme about water use, which is just factually not true, which is just running wild through the public discussion that somehow these data centers are basically destroying all the water, which is this completely insane idea. That factor is [such] a bigger factor holding us back than anything involving external trade." "External trade is the thing that's easy to talk about. It's all of our internal issues that are much, much more important." With Navin Girishankar CSIS Economic Security and Technology Department
0:51

.Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on the data center build-out and how America is holding itself back: "What's happening literally in the US right now county by county with the ability to build data centers is profoundly destructive." "And that's entirely domestic. And a large number of politicians are feeding that hysteria as much as they possibly can." "A lot of our leading public figures, and a lot of intellectuals, and a lot of the press, and a lot of the analysts, and the rest of it, it's just this kind of hyper paranoia about building data centers and the consequences of data centers." "This completely fake meme about water use, which is just factually not true, which is just running wild through the public discussion that somehow these data centers are basically destroying all the water, which is this completely insane idea. That factor is [such] a bigger factor holding us back than anything involving external trade." "External trade is the thing that's easy to talk about. It's all of our internal issues that are much, much more important." With Navin Girishankar CSIS Economic Security and Technology Department

a16z

130,412 views • 2 months ago

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.
0:52

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.

Hanako

24,656 views • 27 days ago

A 29-year-old sales consultant from Oklahoma quit his job thanks to AI - now he makes his director’s entire annual salary in just two weeks. $306,000 in profit over the past month. He replaced an entire team of quants with Claude and a swarm of agents - and built his own ETH price simulation engine. His wallet: Each of the 6 agents validates its own trading decision, and thanks to their precision, he’s pulling in at least $15,000 a day. The agent system coverage speed is far higher than any top-tier trading team. They collect data 24/7 and run simulations using that data in the MiroFish engine - completely autonomously. They remember every pattern, every market reaction, every trading signal. This is a new milestone in algo trading. Every trade is a perfect cycle. Every dollar earned is pure exploitation of market inefficiency. He doesn’t predict the future - the math already knows it. He just reads the numbers right and takes the money. Save this post if you actually want to learn how to build something like this. Or just skip homework and start copying every one of his trades right now - that’s the easiest and most profitable route I’m on:
0:51

A 29-year-old sales consultant from Oklahoma quit his job thanks to AI - now he makes his director’s entire annual salary in just two weeks. $306,000 in profit over the past month. He replaced an entire team of quants with Claude and a swarm of agents - and built his own ETH price simulation engine. His wallet: Each of the 6 agents validates its own trading decision, and thanks to their precision, he’s pulling in at least $15,000 a day. The agent system coverage speed is far higher than any top-tier trading team. They collect data 24/7 and run simulations using that data in the MiroFish engine - completely autonomously. They remember every pattern, every market reaction, every trading signal. This is a new milestone in algo trading. Every trade is a perfect cycle. Every dollar earned is pure exploitation of market inefficiency. He doesn’t predict the future - the math already knows it. He just reads the numbers right and takes the money. Save this post if you actually want to learn how to build something like this. Or just skip homework and start copying every one of his trades right now - that’s the easiest and most profitable route I’m on:

cvxv666

337,817 views • 3 months ago

This guy charges $10,000 per install and does it all from a van. He doesn't even have a proper website. Just posts videos of his work and the leads come to him. What is it? Tree nets. He installs custom nets in trees across Sacramento. A handful of jobs per month at $10K each and he's printing money. I have not seen anyone else is doing this at scale. This is brilliant. The market is wide open If you're okay being 100ft up in a tree to get your work done, this might be a good gig for you.
0:42

This guy charges $10,000 per install and does it all from a van. He doesn't even have a proper website. Just posts videos of his work and the leads come to him. What is it? Tree nets. He installs custom nets in trees across Sacramento. A handful of jobs per month at $10K each and he's printing money. I have not seen anyone else is doing this at scale. This is brilliant. The market is wide open If you're okay being 100ft up in a tree to get your work done, this might be a good gig for you.

Chris Koerner

2,286,140 views • 4 months ago

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$115,615 on Polymarket Since Apr 2, this wallet has been bringing in about $1,501 per day and running at a little over 22 trades per hour 41,972 predictions with a 39% win rate in 80 days This trader’s Polymarket account: This trader started with $219.7K in deposits and is now sitting at roughly +52.6% ROI The bot strategy is simple: > It hunts for short crypto markets where pricing is still out of line > Gets in before the move is fully reflected in the odds > Then keeps firing the same setup across a very large number of entries Most profitable trades: $62.4 → $1,745.5 (+$1,683, +2,693.8%) $27.9 → $1,365.0 (+$1,337, +4,784%) $79.6 → $1,350.0 (+$1,270, +1,595.7%) The result does not come from one outsized win, but from repeating the same edge over and over
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$115,615 on Polymarket Since Apr 2, this wallet has been bringing in about $1,501 per day and running at a little over 22 trades per hour 41,972 predictions with a 39% win rate in 80 days This trader’s Polymarket account: This trader started with $219.7K in deposits and is now sitting at roughly +52.6% ROI The bot strategy is simple: > It hunts for short crypto markets where pricing is still out of line > Gets in before the move is fully reflected in the odds > Then keeps firing the same setup across a very large number of entries Most profitable trades: $62.4 → $1,745.5 (+$1,683, +2,693.8%) $27.9 → $1,365.0 (+$1,337, +4,784%) $79.6 → $1,350.0 (+$1,270, +1,595.7%) The result does not come from one outsized win, but from repeating the same edge over and over

Daniro

129,079 views • 2 months ago

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI
0:33

Too shy? Rutte could not give a direct answer to the question of which country is behind the UAV incident in Poland "On the one hand, I think the question of who is behind this is significant, but on the other hand, it is not that significant because it does not matter whether it was done intentionally. It was reckless in any case, these were Russian drones," he believes. - SMI

Zlatti71

90,969 views • 11 months ago

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$38,385 on Polymarket Since May 11, this wallet has been averaging about $1,200 in profit per day while doing almost 15 trades per hour 11,859 predictions with a 53% win rate in 32 days This trader’s Polymarket account: He started with a $5.2K deposit and is now up roughly +733% ROI The bot strategy is simple: > it keeps targeting markets where the board is still behind the move > gets in before the odds fully catch up then reuses the same setup across a long stream of entries > one trade does not carry the result, the PnL comes from repeating the same small edge until it compounds Most profitable trades: $1,022 → $3,993 (+$2,971, +290.65%) $36 → $2,358 (+$2,322, +6,416.77%) $16 → $2,327 (+$2,310, +13,672.04%) What stands out here is not one lucky trade It is a repeatable short-window process that keeps turning delayed pricing into steady profit
0:25

This trader used Claude to build a Quant Bot and made +$38,385 on Polymarket Since May 11, this wallet has been averaging about $1,200 in profit per day while doing almost 15 trades per hour 11,859 predictions with a 53% win rate in 32 days This trader’s Polymarket account: He started with a $5.2K deposit and is now up roughly +733% ROI The bot strategy is simple: > it keeps targeting markets where the board is still behind the move > gets in before the odds fully catch up then reuses the same setup across a long stream of entries > one trade does not carry the result, the PnL comes from repeating the same small edge until it compounds Most profitable trades: $1,022 → $3,993 (+$2,971, +290.65%) $36 → $2,358 (+$2,322, +6,416.77%) $16 → $2,327 (+$2,310, +13,672.04%) What stands out here is not one lucky trade It is a repeatable short-window process that keeps turning delayed pricing into steady profit

Daniro

42,417 views • 2 months ago

Tyrese Gibson Was Handcuffed In A Courtroom For Missing Child Support, The System That Did This To Him Has A Name, And Every Man Needs To Understand It Tyrese Gibson married Samantha Lee in 2017. She filed for divorce in 2020 after three years of marriage, and they had a daughter, Soraya. The court ordered him to pay $10,690 every single month in child support; he refused, not because he did not love his daughter but because he believed the figure was unjust, as the judge was biased, and the system was stacked against him from the moment he walked through the door. In September 2024, he was handcuffed in an open court and removed by a bailiff in front of everyone just because he owed $73,525 in back payments. His attorney appealed immediately and was released without paying a cent; however, the image of a man being walked out of a courtroom in handcuffs had already done its damage. He later posted on Instagram: "Getting arrested wasn't easy. As a matter of fact, it was very traumatic." This is a man who said, "I am a failure. I am not on top because I don't live under the same roof as my daughter, and I wanted to be married for the rest of my life." That is not the statement of a man who stopped caring, but the statement of a man broken by a system that treated his pain as irrelevant and his finances as a resource to be distributed, not a life to be protected. By December 2024, his income had dropped 85%. He was earning roughly $39,000 a month, and the court was demanding $10,690 of it every month, just for child support before taxes, before his own bills, before his own survival. He filed for a reduction, but his ex-wife's legal team filed to dismiss it, citing that he had only paid the full amount three times in over a year. Now here is what nobody is saying loudly enough. When you are born a man, and you walk into a family court, the system does not begin from a neutral position. Tyrese said it himself on Instagram: "When you were born a man, you go into a courtroom and you understand clearly that there is a preset menu that says, you were born a man, f*** you." That is not bitterness. That is a man describing an experience that tens of thousands of fathers live every single year without cameras and without a platform to speak from. The lesson every man with income, ambition, and a future needs to take from Tyrese Gibson's story is not complicated. A prenup is not a lack of love; it is a legal document that says your financial future belongs to you, regardless of what the emotions do. A clear custody agreement signed before conflict begins is not pessimistic; it is architecture and financial independence, assets in structures that cannot be liquidated by a court order, it is not paranoia, it is the only protection a man has when the relationship ends, and the paperwork begins. Tyrese Gibson loved his wife and called losing her the worst outcome, not the financial penalty, and that tells you everything about where men consistently make the most expensive mistake of their lives: they build from love and forget to build from strategy at the same time. Love the woman you choose, build with her fully, but never let love be the only document protecting what you spent your entire life creating, because the courtroom does not care about love. It only reads what is in writing.
0:41

Tyrese Gibson Was Handcuffed In A Courtroom For Missing Child Support, The System That Did This To Him Has A Name, And Every Man Needs To Understand It Tyrese Gibson married Samantha Lee in 2017. She filed for divorce in 2020 after three years of marriage, and they had a daughter, Soraya. The court ordered him to pay $10,690 every single month in child support; he refused, not because he did not love his daughter but because he believed the figure was unjust, as the judge was biased, and the system was stacked against him from the moment he walked through the door. In September 2024, he was handcuffed in an open court and removed by a bailiff in front of everyone just because he owed $73,525 in back payments. His attorney appealed immediately and was released without paying a cent; however, the image of a man being walked out of a courtroom in handcuffs had already done its damage. He later posted on Instagram: "Getting arrested wasn't easy. As a matter of fact, it was very traumatic." This is a man who said, "I am a failure. I am not on top because I don't live under the same roof as my daughter, and I wanted to be married for the rest of my life." That is not the statement of a man who stopped caring, but the statement of a man broken by a system that treated his pain as irrelevant and his finances as a resource to be distributed, not a life to be protected. By December 2024, his income had dropped 85%. He was earning roughly $39,000 a month, and the court was demanding $10,690 of it every month, just for child support before taxes, before his own bills, before his own survival. He filed for a reduction, but his ex-wife's legal team filed to dismiss it, citing that he had only paid the full amount three times in over a year. Now here is what nobody is saying loudly enough. When you are born a man, and you walk into a family court, the system does not begin from a neutral position. Tyrese said it himself on Instagram: "When you were born a man, you go into a courtroom and you understand clearly that there is a preset menu that says, you were born a man, f*** you." That is not bitterness. That is a man describing an experience that tens of thousands of fathers live every single year without cameras and without a platform to speak from. The lesson every man with income, ambition, and a future needs to take from Tyrese Gibson's story is not complicated. A prenup is not a lack of love; it is a legal document that says your financial future belongs to you, regardless of what the emotions do. A clear custody agreement signed before conflict begins is not pessimistic; it is architecture and financial independence, assets in structures that cannot be liquidated by a court order, it is not paranoia, it is the only protection a man has when the relationship ends, and the paperwork begins. Tyrese Gibson loved his wife and called losing her the worst outcome, not the financial penalty, and that tells you everything about where men consistently make the most expensive mistake of their lives: they build from love and forget to build from strategy at the same time. Love the woman you choose, build with her fully, but never let love be the only document protecting what you spent your entire life creating, because the courtroom does not care about love. It only reads what is in writing.

RAZOR BLADE

12,304 views • 3 months ago