Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

A highly sensitive Pentagon missile component, reportedly from a $15 million THAAD interceptor, has been found intact near the Jordan-Syria border. The component is associated with the missile’s target-locking system. Its recovery could raise serious concerns over the security of U.S. missile technology, possible intelligence exploitation, and whether adversaries...

RealBababanaras's profile picture

Baba Banaras™

179,897 subscribers

12,767 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Kommentare

Profilbild von Boris
Borisvor 5 Tagen

Трамп этим не похвалится

Ähnliche Videos

The kill vehicle from a U.S. THAAD missile interceptor was recovered in southern Syria (Suwayda) after a recent interception. This component is the non-explosive part that destroys targets by direct high-speed impact (“hit-to-kill”). It likely fell back to Syria intact after completing or failing its mission, which is possible since THAAD carries no warhead.
0:24

The kill vehicle from a U.S. THAAD missile interceptor was recovered in southern Syria (Suwayda) after a recent interception. This component is the non-explosive part that destroys targets by direct high-speed impact (“hit-to-kill”). It likely fell back to Syria intact after completing or failing its mission, which is possible since THAAD carries no warhead.

Clash Report

88,971 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: One of the surface-to-air missiles belonging to a THAAD battery of the U.S. Army protecting Israel has been found crashed in Suwayda, Syria. Its seeker section has survived the crash and could potentially be shared with Russia and China for reverse engineering. The system appears to be equipped with an infrared sensor used to detect ballistic missiles and trigger the proximity fuse. #OperationEpicFury #OperationLionsRoar
0:24

BREAKING: One of the surface-to-air missiles belonging to a THAAD battery of the U.S. Army protecting Israel has been found crashed in Suwayda, Syria. Its seeker section has survived the crash and could potentially be shared with Russia and China for reverse engineering. The system appears to be equipped with an infrared sensor used to detect ballistic missiles and trigger the proximity fuse. #OperationEpicFury #OperationLionsRoar

Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch

632,984 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇮🇷 🇮🇱Iran’s rapid missile recovery is causing concern in Israel!🔥 According to reports, Israeli defense officials have been shocked by the rapid restoration of Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities. If Iran maintains a production rate of 100–300 ballistic missiles per month, it could return to near its pre-war missile stockpile levels by early or mid-2027. 🔥 🇮🇷 Iran is expanding its missile capabilities. 💪🚀🔥
0:21

🇮🇷 🇮🇱Iran’s rapid missile recovery is causing concern in Israel!🔥 According to reports, Israeli defense officials have been shocked by the rapid restoration of Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities. If Iran maintains a production rate of 100–300 ballistic missiles per month, it could return to near its pre-war missile stockpile levels by early or mid-2027. 🔥 🇮🇷 Iran is expanding its missile capabilities. 💪🚀🔥

Mojtaba Khamenei Commentary

20,040 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iran is rebuilding its ballistic missile capabilities at a pace that has reportedly shocked Israel’s defense establishment. According to The Jerusalem Post, the IDF is detecting a rapid recovery of Tehran’s missile-production capacity, raising concerns that many of the gains achieved during the war could prove temporary. Iran has found new ways to restore its missile industry and rebuild the arsenal depleted and damaged during the conflict. If Tehran manages to sustain production at the current estimated rate of 100–300 ballistic missiles per month, it could potentially return to approximately pre-war arsenal levels by early or mid-2027. For Israel, this creates a narrowing strategic window. Every additional month gives Iran more time to replenish its missile stocks, disperse production and strengthen protection around critical facilities. If Tehran continues rebuilding at the current pace, Israel may eventually face a choice between accepting the restoration of Iran’s large ballistic missile arsenal or striking its production infrastructure again before that recovery is complete. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 Iran is rebuilding its ballistic missile capabilities at a pace that has reportedly shocked Israel’s defense establishment. According to The Jerusalem Post, the IDF is detecting a rapid recovery of Tehran’s missile-production capacity, raising concerns that many of the gains achieved during the war could prove temporary. Iran has found new ways to restore its missile industry and rebuild the arsenal depleted and damaged during the conflict. If Tehran manages to sustain production at the current estimated rate of 100–300 ballistic missiles per month, it could potentially return to approximately pre-war arsenal levels by early or mid-2027. For Israel, this creates a narrowing strategic window. Every additional month gives Iran more time to replenish its missile stocks, disperse production and strengthen protection around critical facilities. If Tehran continues rebuilding at the current pace, Israel may eventually face a choice between accepting the restoration of Iran’s large ballistic missile arsenal or striking its production infrastructure again before that recovery is complete. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

27,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Lue Elizondo tells CNN the Hellfire Missile UFO may be evidence of “a technological leap” over the U.S. by Russia or China. Elizondo says the President and National Security Council have been “sequestered for decades” from information on UAP.
2:09

Lue Elizondo tells CNN the Hellfire Missile UFO may be evidence of “a technological leap” over the U.S. by Russia or China. Elizondo says the President and National Security Council have been “sequestered for decades” from information on UAP.

UAP James

176,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Iran may study the technology of a captured US underwater drone Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it had captured a US Dive-LD underwater drone near the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz. The system was developed by California-based Anduril. Military analyst Kevin Rowlands said the capture could be both a propaganda victory for Iran and an opportunity to study US technology. Of particular interest would be the propulsion system, communications and navigation systems, and the drone’s controls. The Pentagon said the drone had malfunctioned and was an older version that contained no classified systems or data. Rowlands also believes that the most sensitive technologies may have been protected against capture and exploitation.
4:34

Iran may study the technology of a captured US underwater drone Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it had captured a US Dive-LD underwater drone near the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz. The system was developed by California-based Anduril. Military analyst Kevin Rowlands said the capture could be both a propaganda victory for Iran and an opportunity to study US technology. Of particular interest would be the propulsion system, communications and navigation systems, and the drone’s controls. The Pentagon said the drone had malfunctioned and was an older version that contained no classified systems or data. Rowlands also believes that the most sensitive technologies may have been protected against capture and exploitation.

NEXTA

41,898 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Questions are mounting over whether China or Russia may have helped Iran carry out its deadly strike in Jordan. Rep. Riley Moore says reports suggesting Beijing or Moscow provided targeting information “need to get to the bottom of.” Moore also called China one of America’s top adversaries and urged closer cooperation with U.S. allies in the Gulf. He warned the conflict could expand into a broader regional war if tensions continue to escalate.
1:43

Questions are mounting over whether China or Russia may have helped Iran carry out its deadly strike in Jordan. Rep. Riley Moore says reports suggesting Beijing or Moscow provided targeting information “need to get to the bottom of.” Moore also called China one of America’s top adversaries and urged closer cooperation with U.S. allies in the Gulf. He warned the conflict could expand into a broader regional war if tensions continue to escalate.

Breaking911

121,085 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Why Are U.S. Air Defenses Struggling to Stop Iranian Missiles? The U.S. and its allies have deployed some of the world's most advanced missile defenses, including THAAD and Patriot, yet Iranian missiles have still managed to penetrate the defensive shield. The issue may not be that Patriot or THAAD are completely ineffective. The bigger challenges include large missile salvos, limited interceptor stocks, short reaction times and possible damage to radars and air defense infrastructure. Iran may also be attempting to overwhelm the network through saturation attacks, forcing defenders to spend expensive interceptors against waves of incoming missiles. The key question is no longer whether U.S. air defenses can intercept Iranian missiles. They can. The real question is whether the U.S. and its allies have enough interceptors, radars and operational launchers to sustain the defense during a prolonged missile war.
0:27

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Why Are U.S. Air Defenses Struggling to Stop Iranian Missiles? The U.S. and its allies have deployed some of the world's most advanced missile defenses, including THAAD and Patriot, yet Iranian missiles have still managed to penetrate the defensive shield. The issue may not be that Patriot or THAAD are completely ineffective. The bigger challenges include large missile salvos, limited interceptor stocks, short reaction times and possible damage to radars and air defense infrastructure. Iran may also be attempting to overwhelm the network through saturation attacks, forcing defenders to spend expensive interceptors against waves of incoming missiles. The key question is no longer whether U.S. air defenses can intercept Iranian missiles. They can. The real question is whether the U.S. and its allies have enough interceptors, radars and operational launchers to sustain the defense during a prolonged missile war.

Defense Intelligence

26,363 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇺🇸 America’s war with Iran may have taken a much bigger toll on US military capabilities than it first appeared According to The New York Times, the long-range missiles and air-defence systems used during the Iran campaign were among Washington’s key assets for any potential conflict with Russia or China. The newspaper argues that a prolonged war could make Moscow and Beijing more confident — whether in considering a direct confrontation with the United States or more limited moves, such as an invasion of Taiwan or an attack on a NATO country. Both Russia and China have long been closely tracking US weapons stockpiles. Tom Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at CSIS, warned that US adversaries could decide to act deliberately at a time of their choosing because it may take Washington years to rebuild its forces. While America fights on one front, Moscow and Beijing are already counting how many missiles it has left for the next one.
0:48

🇺🇸 America’s war with Iran may have taken a much bigger toll on US military capabilities than it first appeared According to The New York Times, the long-range missiles and air-defence systems used during the Iran campaign were among Washington’s key assets for any potential conflict with Russia or China. The newspaper argues that a prolonged war could make Moscow and Beijing more confident — whether in considering a direct confrontation with the United States or more limited moves, such as an invasion of Taiwan or an attack on a NATO country. Both Russia and China have long been closely tracking US weapons stockpiles. Tom Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at CSIS, warned that US adversaries could decide to act deliberately at a time of their choosing because it may take Washington years to rebuild its forces. While America fights on one front, Moscow and Beijing are already counting how many missiles it has left for the next one.

NEXTA

66,985 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A barrage of Iranian ballistic missiles reportedly targeted Jordan’s Muwaffaq al-Salti Air Base, with different reports putting the number of launches anywhere between 13 and 40. The exact number of missiles fired or intercepted has not been independently confirmed but footage appears to show a large volume of air-defence interceptor launches. That matters because Patriot interceptors are expensive and difficult to replace quickly. Each interceptor can reportedly cost $4 million, meaning repeated missile attacks can force defenders to continuously spend valuable interceptors to stop incoming threats. This creates a potential war of attrition: Iran may not need every offensive missile to reach its target if repeated barrages force air-defence systems to burn through their stocks. With concerns already raised over Patriot interceptor inventories, the battle above Jordan could become as much a contest of missile stockpiles and replenishment as one of interception accuracy. #iran #IranWar #jordan #missiles #MissileStrike #patriot
2:34

A barrage of Iranian ballistic missiles reportedly targeted Jordan’s Muwaffaq al-Salti Air Base, with different reports putting the number of launches anywhere between 13 and 40. The exact number of missiles fired or intercepted has not been independently confirmed but footage appears to show a large volume of air-defence interceptor launches. That matters because Patriot interceptors are expensive and difficult to replace quickly. Each interceptor can reportedly cost $4 million, meaning repeated missile attacks can force defenders to continuously spend valuable interceptors to stop incoming threats. This creates a potential war of attrition: Iran may not need every offensive missile to reach its target if repeated barrages force air-defence systems to burn through their stocks. With concerns already raised over Patriot interceptor inventories, the battle above Jordan could become as much a contest of missile stockpiles and replenishment as one of interception accuracy. #iran #IranWar #jordan #missiles #MissileStrike #patriot

Srijan Pal Singh

12,010 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.
6:31

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

Defense Intelligence

12,393 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 Tim Dillon on the UFO reverse engineering race “There is a secret race to develop alien technology from craft that has been downed and players in this include all the major superpowers, China, Russia, US. We know of many different types of extraterrestrial or interdimensional or inter whatever visitor and that we have been trying to reverse engineer some of the technology from their crafts in highly classified locations.”
1:03

🚨 Tim Dillon on the UFO reverse engineering race “There is a secret race to develop alien technology from craft that has been downed and players in this include all the major superpowers, China, Russia, US. We know of many different types of extraterrestrial or interdimensional or inter whatever visitor and that we have been trying to reverse engineer some of the technology from their crafts in highly classified locations.”

Red Panda Koala

55,955 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Questions are mounting over whether China or Russia may have helped Iran carry out its deadly strike in Jordan. Rep. Riley Moore says reports suggesting Beijing or Moscow may have provided targeting information "need to get to the bottom of," while arguing China remains a top U.S. adversary. Moore also urged greater cooperation with U.S. allies in the Gulf, warning the conflict could expand into a broader regional war if tensions continue to escalate.
1:43

Questions are mounting over whether China or Russia may have helped Iran carry out its deadly strike in Jordan. Rep. Riley Moore says reports suggesting Beijing or Moscow may have provided targeting information "need to get to the bottom of," while arguing China remains a top U.S. adversary. Moore also urged greater cooperation with U.S. allies in the Gulf, warning the conflict could expand into a broader regional war if tensions continue to escalate.

Fox News

424,488 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Iran reportedly launched ballistic missiles toward U.S. military bases in Jordan, with the attack involving a cluster-type warhead—reportedly the first such use since the clashes in April. As the missile approached its target, its warhead reportedly released multiple submunitions, creating several threats during the terminal phase. That can make an already difficult interception problem even more complicated. Instead of tracking and engaging a single incoming missile, air-defence systems may have to deal with multiple objects appearing close to the target, while another wave of ballistic missiles is arriving at roughly the same time. The episode highlights the challenge of saturation attacks: modern missile defence isn't just about how advanced the interceptor is—it’s also about whether the entire network can handle the number, timing and complexity of threats arriving simultaneously. #iran #IranWar #missiles #ClusterMunitions #jordan #MissileStrike
2:35

Iran reportedly launched ballistic missiles toward U.S. military bases in Jordan, with the attack involving a cluster-type warhead—reportedly the first such use since the clashes in April. As the missile approached its target, its warhead reportedly released multiple submunitions, creating several threats during the terminal phase. That can make an already difficult interception problem even more complicated. Instead of tracking and engaging a single incoming missile, air-defence systems may have to deal with multiple objects appearing close to the target, while another wave of ballistic missiles is arriving at roughly the same time. The episode highlights the challenge of saturation attacks: modern missile defence isn't just about how advanced the interceptor is—it’s also about whether the entire network can handle the number, timing and complexity of threats arriving simultaneously. #iran #IranWar #missiles #ClusterMunitions #jordan #MissileStrike

Srijan Pal Singh

12,397 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Iran’s missile arsenal may be getting a major new capability. Reports say Iranian forces attempted to use a ballistic missile equipped with an electro-optical seeker against U.S. warships, a technology that uses cameras and light sensors to help identify and track a target. Iranian officials described the weapon as a new “special anti-destroyer” missile, while U.S. Central Command said the attacks were unsuccessful. Iran had also previously unveiled the Qassem Bassir, claiming it could conduct precision strikes without GPS, although it has not been confirmed that the missile used in this attack was the Qassem Bassir. The bigger development is Iran’s apparent shift toward more precise systems designed to threaten moving naval targets. If these anti-ship capabilities and targeting technologies continue to improve, they could increase pressure on U.S. warships and potentially commercial shipping, around the Strait of Hormuz. #Iran #IranWar #missiles #MissileStrike #usnavy #CENTCOM
2:46

Iran’s missile arsenal may be getting a major new capability. Reports say Iranian forces attempted to use a ballistic missile equipped with an electro-optical seeker against U.S. warships, a technology that uses cameras and light sensors to help identify and track a target. Iranian officials described the weapon as a new “special anti-destroyer” missile, while U.S. Central Command said the attacks were unsuccessful. Iran had also previously unveiled the Qassem Bassir, claiming it could conduct precision strikes without GPS, although it has not been confirmed that the missile used in this attack was the Qassem Bassir. The bigger development is Iran’s apparent shift toward more precise systems designed to threaten moving naval targets. If these anti-ship capabilities and targeting technologies continue to improve, they could increase pressure on U.S. warships and potentially commercial shipping, around the Strait of Hormuz. #Iran #IranWar #missiles #MissileStrike #usnavy #CENTCOM

Srijan Pal Singh

17,086 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

🇺🇸 U.S. Central Command has requested the deployment of Dark Eagle hypersonic missiles, for potential strikes on Iran. First, this is a big deal. The U.S. has never before used hypersonic (Mach 5 or greater) weapons in combat. The Dark Eagle is a precision offensive strike weapon that travels at over 3,800 mph, and can maneuver unpredictably mid-flight. Which makes it essentially impossible for existing missile defense systems to intercept. It has a range of over 1,650 mi, meaning it could reach Tehran from launch positions in the Gulf in minutes. The reason CENTCOM wants it now is that Iran has moved its ballistic missile launchers deeper into the country, beyond the reach of the current Precision Strike Missile (PrSM). Each hypersonic costs roughly $15 million, and there are no more than 8 available. Russia and China, it’s worth noting, have been deploying their own versions for years. Deploying it sends a message to Tehran, but also to Beijing and Moscow: America's hypersonic capability is finally here. Source: Combat Tech YT
1:04

🇺🇸 U.S. Central Command has requested the deployment of Dark Eagle hypersonic missiles, for potential strikes on Iran. First, this is a big deal. The U.S. has never before used hypersonic (Mach 5 or greater) weapons in combat. The Dark Eagle is a precision offensive strike weapon that travels at over 3,800 mph, and can maneuver unpredictably mid-flight. Which makes it essentially impossible for existing missile defense systems to intercept. It has a range of over 1,650 mi, meaning it could reach Tehran from launch positions in the Gulf in minutes. The reason CENTCOM wants it now is that Iran has moved its ballistic missile launchers deeper into the country, beyond the reach of the current Precision Strike Missile (PrSM). Each hypersonic costs roughly $15 million, and there are no more than 8 available. Russia and China, it’s worth noting, have been deploying their own versions for years. Deploying it sends a message to Tehran, but also to Beijing and Moscow: America's hypersonic capability is finally here. Source: Combat Tech YT

Mario Nawfal

107,702 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten