Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

a humanoid robotics engineer probably understands muscle mechanics better than most med students because they had to rebuild it from scratch btw muscles only pull and never push every pushing motion you've ever made? a pull from the opposite side your arm extends because the tricep pulls the forearm... back in reality you've never actually pushed anything in your life the entire body is a tension network cables, attachment points, geometry doing the rest no pistons no compression just opposing pulls timed perfectly, we spent decades building rigid actuators trying to replicate this then tendon-driven robotics came along and finally admitted what biology already knew we're a species of pullers who spent centuries convinced we push things aren’t always how they might appearshow more

Saint Nomad

7,655 subscribers

130,517 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Health & Wellness Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

19 Comments

Manta Array1 day ago

1. The vast majority of humanoid robotics engineers use electromagnetic rotary motors for direct torque 2. The very small subset of developed artificial pulling muscles *diverge fundamentally from biology* and the molecular cross bridge cycle mechanisms underlying bio

Saint Nomad1 day ago

Very true but even tho that small number is just mad engineerin

高超 Joshua1 day ago

前沿研究最让人着迷的地方就是你不知道哪里有用但是有用的东西一定会冒出来。

FeatheredSerpent1 day ago

i pushed a car last week 🤔

mindheist1 day ago

amazing how they evolve so fast.

Jesús Alguacil1 day ago

Lo interesante es cómo la robótica está revelando que muchos conceptos intuitivos sobre el cuerpo eran simplificaciones.

Ke1 day ago

なぜかわかりますか？筋肉細胞、いやアクチンとミオシンは収縮と弛緩しかできないからです。医者は最初から知っています。知らないのは工学者ですよ

Thibos_Nkutha1 day ago

💯

Juriën2 days ago

Wrong! The tongue!

Seth BRKV1 day ago

Every med student knows people can only pull. That's what they read in the books about actin and myosin

Your Future SMRT CEO 🚇1 day ago

So why do we say "PUSH!!!"?

🇸🇭🇪🇷🇱🇴🇨🇰1 day ago

> we're a species of pullers who spent centuries convinced we push >

VK86433671 day ago

Это шаг в правильном направлении. Только с такими мышцами можно создать робота, практически неотличимого от человека.

Arya Singh1 day ago

Why can't I pull any bitches

Dataphile1 day ago

This is interesting academically but as a practical engineering solution its impossibly complex & would cost million$ each and break down every 20’min

🇺🇸 Josh 🇺🇸1 day ago

"push" the box with your "can only pull" muscles go on.........

Matt Seal1 day ago

Westworld

OSIRIS - X1 day ago

👀👀

Mitch Guerrero1 day ago

Hence the grip being the indicator of your life.

Related Videos

A week of sleepless nights to build a website. Worth every single one. Everything you see is custom. Every hover state, every transition, every 3D element, every micro-interaction, coded from scratch. No templates. Nothing off the shelf. We used Claude to push the code further. The team refused to settle. Three times we had a version that was ready. Three times we scrapped it. Most ship good enough. We can't. Not because we're perfectionists for the sake of it. Because the companies we work with are building something real. They deserve a partner who treats every detail like it matters. Because it does. And this is only the MVP. The full site is coming in the next few weeks. It only gets better from here. We're available. Let's start a project.

A week of sleepless nights to build a website. Worth every single one. Everything you see is custom. Every hover state, every transition, every 3D element, every micro-interaction, coded from scratch. No templates. Nothing off the shelf. We used Claude to push the code further. The team refused to settle. Three times we had a version that was ready. Three times we scrapped it. Most ship good enough. We can't. Not because we're perfectionists for the sake of it. Because the companies we work with are building something real. They deserve a partner who treats every detail like it matters. Because it does. And this is only the MVP. The full site is coming in the next few weeks. It only gets better from here. We're available. Let's start a project.

Amjad

23,855 views • 5 months ago

A student in Zurich sleeps in a camper van outside a hangar every night. Just to have more hours to build a humanoid robot. He’s obsessive. He's not alone. 2,500 students across Europe are getting into robotics right now. And now they united and just launched: ESRA, the European Student Robotics Association. 🇪🇺🦾 They are bringing together highly talented young people, give them space, give them resources and let them build. By now already 13 robotics clubs. 8 countries. 2,500+ students. I visited several of them over the last weeks to get to know them and let them tell their stories. We've also been helping behind the scenes where we can, because this is exactly what Europe needs. Several multiple billion dollar companies will come out of the ESRA network. Right here in Europe. If the Bay Area had a student robotics network like this, they would never shut up about it. Time we do the same. 😤🔥🇪🇺 It only needs a few crazy ones to fix a continent. Turns out they're already building. 🇪🇺

A student in Zurich sleeps in a camper van outside a hangar every night. Just to have more hours to build a humanoid robot. He’s obsessive. He's not alone. 2,500 students across Europe are getting into robotics right now. And now they united and just launched: ESRA, the European Student Robotics Association. 🇪🇺🦾 They are bringing together highly talented young people, give them space, give them resources and let them build. By now already 13 robotics clubs. 8 countries. 2,500+ students. I visited several of them over the last weeks to get to know them and let them tell their stories. We've also been helping behind the scenes where we can, because this is exactly what Europe needs. Several multiple billion dollar companies will come out of the ESRA network. Right here in Europe. If the Bay Area had a student robotics network like this, they would never shut up about it. Time we do the same. 😤🔥🇪🇺 It only needs a few crazy ones to fix a continent. Turns out they're already building. 🇪🇺

Andreas Klinger 🦾

116,784 views • 5 months ago

The muscle group that makes men over 40 look old from behind: Rear delts. It's pretty easy to spot if this applies to you. Just stand side on in front of a mirror. You'll notice your shoulders will be rolled forward, likely your head is forward too, and your posture resembles something akin to Quasimodo. And you shouldn't be surprised. This is what happens after 25 years of pressing and desk work training the FRONT of your shoulder while the back of it did nothing. Every push you've ever done pulled your shoulders forward. Almost nothing you've done pulls them back into the socket. The fix I use (and recommend to clients too)? Seated single arm rear delt row with a high elbow and a roller squeezed between the knees. Why each piece matters: High elbow = this is what separates it from a normal row. Elbow travels out and up, in line with the rear delt fibers. Row with a tucked elbow and your lats take over. Lats are already strong. That's not the target. Seated + roller squeeze = pelvis anchored, ribs stacked, spine can't lean back to cheat the weight up. The rep comes from the shoulder, not momentum. No squeeze, and the lean-back creeps in by rep six. Single arm = most men over 40 have one shoulder blade that sits lower and works worse. Bilateral rows let the good side carry it. One arm at a time, the weak side gets found out and fixed. Cable = tension through the whole arc, including the stretched position in front of your body where the rear delt actually needs work. The rear delt pulls your arm back in line with your body. Train it and your shoulders sit where they did at 30. You'll find your shirts hang differently and you'll command a more assertive posture in board meetings and Zoom calls. Remember... User a lighter weight, high elbow and feel the back of the shoulder do the work. Most guys never have.

The muscle group that makes men over 40 look old from behind: Rear delts. It's pretty easy to spot if this applies to you. Just stand side on in front of a mirror. You'll notice your shoulders will be rolled forward, likely your head is forward too, and your posture resembles something akin to Quasimodo. And you shouldn't be surprised. This is what happens after 25 years of pressing and desk work training the FRONT of your shoulder while the back of it did nothing. Every push you've ever done pulled your shoulders forward. Almost nothing you've done pulls them back into the socket. The fix I use (and recommend to clients too)? Seated single arm rear delt row with a high elbow and a roller squeezed between the knees. Why each piece matters: High elbow = this is what separates it from a normal row. Elbow travels out and up, in line with the rear delt fibers. Row with a tucked elbow and your lats take over. Lats are already strong. That's not the target. Seated + roller squeeze = pelvis anchored, ribs stacked, spine can't lean back to cheat the weight up. The rep comes from the shoulder, not momentum. No squeeze, and the lean-back creeps in by rep six. Single arm = most men over 40 have one shoulder blade that sits lower and works worse. Bilateral rows let the good side carry it. One arm at a time, the weak side gets found out and fixed. Cable = tension through the whole arc, including the stretched position in front of your body where the rear delt actually needs work. The rear delt pulls your arm back in line with your body. Train it and your shoulders sit where they did at 30. You'll find your shirts hang differently and you'll command a more assertive posture in board meetings and Zoom calls. Remember... User a lighter weight, high elbow and feel the back of the shoulder do the work. Most guys never have.

Simmo

35,522 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk just said out loud what the entire robotics industry spent thirty years refusing to see. Musk: “Humanity has designed the world to interact with a bipedal humanoid with two arms and ten fingers.” Every staircase. Every doorknob. Every factory floor. Every hospital corridor. Civilization is not an open environment. It is a monument built around one specific body. The industry spent decades engineering quadrupeds, wheeled machines, exotic locomotion systems. Then spent more years asking how to retrofit the world around them. Tesla never asked that question. Musk: “If you want to have a robot fit in and be able to do things that humans can do, it must be of roughly the same size and shape and capability.” This is not a design philosophy. It is a pass key to every structure humanity has ever built. Optimus does not navigate civilization. It inherits it. Musk: “Work that is repetitive, boring, dangerous. Basically, work that people don’t want to do unless they’re paid to do it.” Remove every task performed out of obligation rather than choice. What remains is pure cognitive output. Not automation. The liberation of human attention at species scale. The interviewer pushed back directly: “I thought four legs are better.” Musk laughed. Musk: “Four legs good, two legs bad.” Someone in the room said exactly what the entire industry believed. He dismissed it with an Orwell joke and moved on. Whoever fields this first does not gain a labor advantage. They inherit the physical layer of civilization itself. Every structure ever built. Every tool ever forged. Every corridor ever designed. Already engineered for this exact body. The world was never neutral ground. It was always waiting for the right body to walk through it. Someone was always going to see it. Most just spent thirty years looking away.

Elon Musk just said out loud what the entire robotics industry spent thirty years refusing to see. Musk: “Humanity has designed the world to interact with a bipedal humanoid with two arms and ten fingers.” Every staircase. Every doorknob. Every factory floor. Every hospital corridor. Civilization is not an open environment. It is a monument built around one specific body. The industry spent decades engineering quadrupeds, wheeled machines, exotic locomotion systems. Then spent more years asking how to retrofit the world around them. Tesla never asked that question. Musk: “If you want to have a robot fit in and be able to do things that humans can do, it must be of roughly the same size and shape and capability.” This is not a design philosophy. It is a pass key to every structure humanity has ever built. Optimus does not navigate civilization. It inherits it. Musk: “Work that is repetitive, boring, dangerous. Basically, work that people don’t want to do unless they’re paid to do it.” Remove every task performed out of obligation rather than choice. What remains is pure cognitive output. Not automation. The liberation of human attention at species scale. The interviewer pushed back directly: “I thought four legs are better.” Musk laughed. Musk: “Four legs good, two legs bad.” Someone in the room said exactly what the entire industry believed. He dismissed it with an Orwell joke and moved on. Whoever fields this first does not gain a labor advantage. They inherit the physical layer of civilization itself. Every structure ever built. Every tool ever forged. Every corridor ever designed. Already engineered for this exact body. The world was never neutral ground. It was always waiting for the right body to walk through it. Someone was always going to see it. Most just spent thirty years looking away.

Dustin

420,301 views • 6 months ago

$Elon Musk just laid out why Starlink will move the GDP of entire nations. It might be the most important sentence in modern economics. Musk: “GDP is a function of average productivity per person.” Nine words. The entire field of development economics stripped to a single equation. Productivity up. GDP up. That’s it. Everything institutions have spent decades overcomplicating. One sentence. So what is the single largest constraint on human productivity right now? Not capital. Not policy. Not governance. Access. Musk: “If you don’t have access to the internet, or it’s too expensive or low bandwidth, you cannot access the MIT lessons and you can’t sell the goods and services that you produce.” No connection means no global knowledge and no global market. You produce for your village. You learn from your village. Your ceiling is not your ability. It is your coordinates. Billions of people live behind that ceiling right now. Not because they lack intelligence or drive. Because a signal never reached them. Think about what that means for the species. The most valuable resource on this planet is not oil. Not lithium. Not data. It is human intelligence. And we have been running all of civilization on a fraction of the total supply. The rest sits in the dark. Locked behind geography that no one chose and no one can outwork. Every breakthrough in human history came from a mind that had access. Every genius we celebrate had a connection to the accumulated knowledge of their time. The ones who didn’t, left no names. No papers. No inventions. They are invisible to history. Not because they were less capable. Because they were unreachable. That is not a tragedy of talent. It is a tragedy of signal. Telecoms saw those regions decades ago. Ran the numbers. Unprofitable. Moved on. Governments promised infrastructure. Formed committees. Commissioned studies. Approved budgets that never arrived. The cables still haven’t come. Elon skipped the ground entirely. 10,000+ satellites. Planetary coverage. No cables. No permits. No dependence on anyone’s political timeline. A dish points at the sky and isolation ends. Musk: “Internet connectivity is certainly a candidate for one of the things that would do more to lift people out of poverty than anything else.” Where Starlink goes live, it’s already real. Farmers selling globally instead of locally. Students pulling MIT’s full course library from orbit. Workers bidding on contracts from continents they’ve never set foot on. Not projected. Happening. Musk: “Starlink will actually move the GDP of countries. Like it’s gonna be that kind of thing.” Move the GDP of countries. Not a company’s revenue. Not a sector. The total economic output of sovereign nations. Shifted from orbit by one constellation. Telecoms spent decades deciding who was profitable enough to connect. Starlink connected the planet and made that question extinct. This is not an ISP. This is not a telecom play. The species has been running on a fraction of its own intelligence for the entirety of recorded history. That era is ending. From orbit.$

Elon Musk just laid out why Starlink will move the GDP of entire nations. It might be the most important sentence in modern economics. Musk: “GDP is a function of average productivity per person.” Nine words. The entire field of development economics stripped to a single equation. Productivity up. GDP up. That’s it. Everything institutions have spent decades overcomplicating. One sentence. So what is the single largest constraint on human productivity right now? Not capital. Not policy. Not governance. Access. Musk: “If you don’t have access to the internet, or it’s too expensive or low bandwidth, you cannot access the MIT lessons and you can’t sell the goods and services that you produce.” No connection means no global knowledge and no global market. You produce for your village. You learn from your village. Your ceiling is not your ability. It is your coordinates. Billions of people live behind that ceiling right now. Not because they lack intelligence or drive. Because a signal never reached them. Think about what that means for the species. The most valuable resource on this planet is not oil. Not lithium. Not data. It is human intelligence. And we have been running all of civilization on a fraction of the total supply. The rest sits in the dark. Locked behind geography that no one chose and no one can outwork. Every breakthrough in human history came from a mind that had access. Every genius we celebrate had a connection to the accumulated knowledge of their time. The ones who didn’t, left no names. No papers. No inventions. They are invisible to history. Not because they were less capable. Because they were unreachable. That is not a tragedy of talent. It is a tragedy of signal. Telecoms saw those regions decades ago. Ran the numbers. Unprofitable. Moved on. Governments promised infrastructure. Formed committees. Commissioned studies. Approved budgets that never arrived. The cables still haven’t come. Elon skipped the ground entirely. 10,000+ satellites. Planetary coverage. No cables. No permits. No dependence on anyone’s political timeline. A dish points at the sky and isolation ends. Musk: “Internet connectivity is certainly a candidate for one of the things that would do more to lift people out of poverty than anything else.” Where Starlink goes live, it’s already real. Farmers selling globally instead of locally. Students pulling MIT’s full course library from orbit. Workers bidding on contracts from continents they’ve never set foot on. Not projected. Happening. Musk: “Starlink will actually move the GDP of countries. Like it’s gonna be that kind of thing.” Move the GDP of countries. Not a company’s revenue. Not a sector. The total economic output of sovereign nations. Shifted from orbit by one constellation. Telecoms spent decades deciding who was profitable enough to connect. Starlink connected the planet and made that question extinct. This is not an ISP. This is not a telecom play. The species has been running on a fraction of its own intelligence for the entirety of recorded history. That era is ending. From orbit.

Dustin

21,721 views • 2 months ago

$Elon Musk looked at the only known instance of consciousness in the observable universe and saw what any engineer would. Single point of failure. No redundancy. No backup. Unacceptable. Musk: “To the best of our knowledge, we don’t know of life anywhere else.” 93 billion light years. Trillions of galaxies. Septillions of stars. Every telescope, every probe, every signal sweep humanity has ever aimed outward. Silence. Total silence. This planet might be the only place in the entire cosmos where anything has ever opened its eyes and understood it exists. Musk: “I think we should always view consciousness, life as we know it, as precarious and delicate.” He didn’t say rare. He said precarious. As in one event from gone. One asteroid. One supervolcano. One miscalculation. And consciousness disappears from the observable universe like it never happened. Every language ever spoken. Every theorem ever proven. Every memory ever held. All of it on one rock. No copy. Musk: “SpaceX is about advancing rocket technology to the point where we can extend life and consciousness beyond Earth. To the Moon. To Mars. Eventually to other star systems.” One person on the entire planet looked at this and decided it was an engineering problem with a deadline. Not a philosophy debate. Not a thought experiment. A problem that requires rockets and a window that won’t stay open forever. The public sees the rockets and thinks ego. They’re staring at the only lifeboat and calling it a vanity project. Civilizations don’t build forever. They peak. They fracture. They lose the stomach for hard things. The gap between “able to leave” and “no longer willing to try” could be one generation. Maybe less. The universe spent 13.8 billion years producing one species capable of knowing it exists. It did that once. You are not in the universe. You are the universe becoming aware of itself. If we go dark, the universe doesn’t lose a species. It loses the only thing that ever knew it was here. Not because something forgets. Because there’s nothing left that can.$

Elon Musk looked at the only known instance of consciousness in the observable universe and saw what any engineer would. Single point of failure. No redundancy. No backup. Unacceptable. Musk: “To the best of our knowledge, we don’t know of life anywhere else.” 93 billion light years. Trillions of galaxies. Septillions of stars. Every telescope, every probe, every signal sweep humanity has ever aimed outward. Silence. Total silence. This planet might be the only place in the entire cosmos where anything has ever opened its eyes and understood it exists. Musk: “I think we should always view consciousness, life as we know it, as precarious and delicate.” He didn’t say rare. He said precarious. As in one event from gone. One asteroid. One supervolcano. One miscalculation. And consciousness disappears from the observable universe like it never happened. Every language ever spoken. Every theorem ever proven. Every memory ever held. All of it on one rock. No copy. Musk: “SpaceX is about advancing rocket technology to the point where we can extend life and consciousness beyond Earth. To the Moon. To Mars. Eventually to other star systems.” One person on the entire planet looked at this and decided it was an engineering problem with a deadline. Not a philosophy debate. Not a thought experiment. A problem that requires rockets and a window that won’t stay open forever. The public sees the rockets and thinks ego. They’re staring at the only lifeboat and calling it a vanity project. Civilizations don’t build forever. They peak. They fracture. They lose the stomach for hard things. The gap between “able to leave” and “no longer willing to try” could be one generation. Maybe less. The universe spent 13.8 billion years producing one species capable of knowing it exists. It did that once. You are not in the universe. You are the universe becoming aware of itself. If we go dark, the universe doesn’t lose a species. It loses the only thing that ever knew it was here. Not because something forgets. Because there’s nothing left that can.

Dustin

21,363 views • 2 months ago

Anthropic engineer just dropped a full walkthrough on building AI agents from scratch this single video is worth more than any $600 AI agents course here's what she covers: > what Agent, Environment, and Session actually mean > how to stream live events from your agent > wiring up custom tools from scratch > the server-side loop that makes agents actually work > roadmap to subagents, vaults, and memory 37 minutes that will answer every question you have about building agents the people who understand what Claude can actually do are building things everyone else thinks requires a whole team most of them aren't smarter, they just know features that most people have never heard of full breakdown on every Claude feature worth knowing in the article below

Anthropic engineer just dropped a full walkthrough on building AI agents from scratch this single video is worth more than any $600 AI agents course here's what she covers: > what Agent, Environment, and Session actually mean > how to stream live events from your agent > wiring up custom tools from scratch > the server-side loop that makes agents actually work > roadmap to subagents, vaults, and memory 37 minutes that will answer every question you have about building agents the people who understand what Claude can actually do are building things everyone else thinks requires a whole team most of them aren't smarter, they just know features that most people have never heard of full breakdown on every Claude feature worth knowing in the article below

Anatoli Kopadze

39,240 views • 3 months ago

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,190,914 views • 1 year ago

🚨 COME SMOKE A CIGARETTE WITH ME A random guy from Brooklyn named Bob posted a message telling total strangers to meet him in a park just to smoke a single cigarette with him. No context. No explanation. Nothing. And somehow the internet DID IT. Dozens of people actually showed up. Most of them didn’t even smoke. They just came because a stranger on the internet said “pull up.” When reporters finally tracked him down, Bob admitted the truth: He only did it so he could tell everyone NOT to smoke. But by then it had already turned into the most unexpectedly wholesome chaos ever. “I don’t even smoke, I just came for the vibes.” It’s the most beautifully unhinged social experiment the internet has created all year. Does this show how weird the internet is… or how lonely people actually are?

🚨 COME SMOKE A CIGARETTE WITH ME A random guy from Brooklyn named Bob posted a message telling total strangers to meet him in a park just to smoke a single cigarette with him. No context. No explanation. Nothing. And somehow the internet DID IT. Dozens of people actually showed up. Most of them didn’t even smoke. They just came because a stranger on the internet said “pull up.” When reporters finally tracked him down, Bob admitted the truth: He only did it so he could tell everyone NOT to smoke. But by then it had already turned into the most unexpectedly wholesome chaos ever. “I don’t even smoke, I just came for the vibes.” It’s the most beautifully unhinged social experiment the internet has created all year. Does this show how weird the internet is… or how lonely people actually are?

HustleBitch

90,809 views • 10 months ago

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Elon Musk just told you the job is dying. Most people heard a prediction. A few heard a prison door opening. Musk: “In less than 20 years, working at all will be optional.” That is not a policy suggestion. That is a countdown. For three hundred years, the human blueprint has been identical. You are born. You move to the city. You rent a box near the office. You trade your body and your hours for the right to exist. You do this until you are old. Then you stop. Then you die. The entire model runs on one assumption. That human labor is the only engine. AI and robotics delete that assumption. When the machine handles production at a scale no human crew can match, the forced migration to the city evaporates. The commute evaporates. The cubicle evaporates. The alarm clock that owns your nervous system for forty years evaporates. Musk: “I think it won’t be the case that you have to be in a city for a job.” The city was never a choice. It was a requirement disguised as ambition. You moved to the noise and the concrete and the $4,000 rent because the paycheck lived there. Remove the paycheck from the equation and the geography changes overnight. You can live in the mountains. On the coast. In the silence of a town most people have never heard of. You can wake up to nothing but trees and cold air and the complete absence of anyone else’s schedule. That is not a fantasy. That is the math resolving. But here is where most people break. They hear “work is optional” and they see emptiness. A species with nothing to do. Billions of people staring at screens until their minds dissolve. That fear tells you everything about what the system has already done to us. We confused labor with purpose. The grind with meaning. The paycheck with proof that we matter. Musk: “In the same way that you could grow your own vegetables in your garden.” The analogy is precise. You do not grow tomatoes because the economy demands it. You grow them because something in you wants to build a thing with your hands and watch it come alive. That instinct does not disappear when the job does. It gets unleashed. The artist who spent twenty years doing accounting finally paints. The engineer who always wanted to build something of her own finally builds it. The kid in a small town who could never afford to take the risk finally takes it. Work does not vanish. Forced work vanishes. What replaces it is creation without a gun to your head. This is the part that keeps me up at night. We are standing at the edge of the largest liberation in human history. And the loudest voices in the room are begging to stay in the cell. They want the commute. They want the boss. They want the structure that tells them when to eat and when to sleep and when they are allowed to think about their own life. Because freedom without a template is terrifying. The next twenty years will not test our technology. The technology is already ahead of schedule. They will test whether the species can handle what it has been asking for since the beginning of civilization. Time. Space. Silence. And the unbearable weight of choosing what your life actually means when no one is forcing the answer. That is not a prediction. That is the final exam. And nobody is ready.

Dustin

111,869 views • 5 months ago

🇺🇸 A former Freemason just told Tucker what most people aren't ready to hear... The CIA spent decades studying astral projection. Darwin serves transhumanism. That's not a typo. Filmmaker Sean Stone made the case that materialism, the worldview claiming reality is only what we can see and measure, is the most spiritually corrosive idea in modern history. His logic is tight. Remove God from the creation story and humans don't get liberation. They get an inflated ego that fills the vacuum. Once we believe we're the greatest thing in the universe, the door swings open to transhumanism. That's the agenda materialism was built to enable. The wildest part was the CIA mention. The agency has spent decades studying astral projection, the ability to perceive things outside the physical body. Hospital patients with no brain activity have accurately described events in other rooms. Stone's framing: the brain doesn't generate consciousness. It receives it, like a computer picking up signal from a wider network. The most powerful institutions on earth insist reality is only physical... ask who benefits from that belief. Source: TCN

🇺🇸 A former Freemason just told Tucker what most people aren't ready to hear... The CIA spent decades studying astral projection. Darwin serves transhumanism. That's not a typo. Filmmaker Sean Stone made the case that materialism, the worldview claiming reality is only what we can see and measure, is the most spiritually corrosive idea in modern history. His logic is tight. Remove God from the creation story and humans don't get liberation. They get an inflated ego that fills the vacuum. Once we believe we're the greatest thing in the universe, the door swings open to transhumanism. That's the agenda materialism was built to enable. The wildest part was the CIA mention. The agency has spent decades studying astral projection, the ability to perceive things outside the physical body. Hospital patients with no brain activity have accurately described events in other rooms. Stone's framing: the brain doesn't generate consciousness. It receives it, like a computer picking up signal from a wider network. The most powerful institutions on earth insist reality is only physical... ask who benefits from that belief. Source: TCN

Mario Nawfal

1,191,988 views • 4 months ago

No medical school in the world is teaching this. So no matter how many degrees they have or how smart they think they are, every doctor in the conventional system starts from the same false premise: that you are a bag of illness, that your life is always at risk, and that they are the ones keeping you alive. That is not the truth about the human body. God has been choreographing a delicate dance since the dawn of man. There are millions of bacteria and viruses on your hands right now as you sit there. Millions. And in all of human history, not one of them has risen up and wiped us out. Not one. Because the body knows what it is doing. And yet somehow we decided we were smart enough to eliminate 17 of those viruses from existence, and while we were at it we would inject aluminum, mercury, polysorbate 80, fatty lipids, mRNA, and God knows what else directly into the bloodstreams of our children. And we would wear masks. And we would do all of this on the advice of the most educated people in the room. Who told you that you needed any of this? The same people who never once stopped to ask whether the most sophisticated biological system ever created might already know something they don't.

No medical school in the world is teaching this. So no matter how many degrees they have or how smart they think they are, every doctor in the conventional system starts from the same false premise: that you are a bag of illness, that your life is always at risk, and that they are the ones keeping you alive. That is not the truth about the human body. God has been choreographing a delicate dance since the dawn of man. There are millions of bacteria and viruses on your hands right now as you sit there. Millions. And in all of human history, not one of them has risen up and wiped us out. Not one. Because the body knows what it is doing. And yet somehow we decided we were smart enough to eliminate 17 of those viruses from existence, and while we were at it we would inject aluminum, mercury, polysorbate 80, fatty lipids, mRNA, and God knows what else directly into the bloodstreams of our children. And we would wear masks. And we would do all of this on the advice of the most educated people in the room. Who told you that you needed any of this? The same people who never once stopped to ask whether the most sophisticated biological system ever created might already know something they don't.

Del Bigtree

107,602 views • 5 months ago

Yann LeCun sat across from Lex Fridman and quietly proved that intelligence has nothing to do with thinking. He did it with two sentences about a trophy. “The trophy doesn’t fit in the suitcase because it’s too big.” “The trophy doesn’t fit in the suitcase because it’s too small.” Same words. One swap at the end. In the first, “it” is the trophy. In the second, “it” is the suitcase. You solved both before you finished reading. Nobody taught you that. There is no rule for it. No logic chain. No formula. You knew because you’ve held things. Packed things. Felt the resistance of something too large for the space it was meant to fill. LeCun calls this grounding. “A big object doesn’t fit in a small object.” The machine has read that line a billion times. It has never once picked anything up. It knows the word “big.” It has never been small enough to be lifted, or large enough to be the problem. So when the sentence turns, it has nothing to turn on. You didn’t solve that riddle by thinking. You solved it by having lived. Every object your hands ever closed around. Every door you misjudged. Every suitcase you overpacked and forced shut. Decades of physics written into your nervous system so deep you can’t even find it. That is what answered the question. Not your mind. Your life. LeCun: “You have this knowledge of how the world works, of geometry, and things like that.” Now point that at yourself. Most of what you understand, you could never explain. You cannot describe how you catch a ball. How you judge the weight of a bag before you lift it. How you know a staircase is wrong before your foot confirms it. Your deepest intelligence has no language in it at all. We spent centuries convinced that thinking was the highest act of the mind. LeCun is pointing at something underneath it. Something older. Something the body learned long before the mouth could speak. Intelligence was never computation. It was accumulation. The slow, silent record of a life spent touching the world. The machine holds every word ever written about it. It has never once been in it. We keep asking whether it thinks. It cannot even tell us which “it” we mean.

Yann LeCun sat across from Lex Fridman and quietly proved that intelligence has nothing to do with thinking. He did it with two sentences about a trophy. “The trophy doesn’t fit in the suitcase because it’s too big.” “The trophy doesn’t fit in the suitcase because it’s too small.” Same words. One swap at the end. In the first, “it” is the trophy. In the second, “it” is the suitcase. You solved both before you finished reading. Nobody taught you that. There is no rule for it. No logic chain. No formula. You knew because you’ve held things. Packed things. Felt the resistance of something too large for the space it was meant to fill. LeCun calls this grounding. “A big object doesn’t fit in a small object.” The machine has read that line a billion times. It has never once picked anything up. It knows the word “big.” It has never been small enough to be lifted, or large enough to be the problem. So when the sentence turns, it has nothing to turn on. You didn’t solve that riddle by thinking. You solved it by having lived. Every object your hands ever closed around. Every door you misjudged. Every suitcase you overpacked and forced shut. Decades of physics written into your nervous system so deep you can’t even find it. That is what answered the question. Not your mind. Your life. LeCun: “You have this knowledge of how the world works, of geometry, and things like that.” Now point that at yourself. Most of what you understand, you could never explain. You cannot describe how you catch a ball. How you judge the weight of a bag before you lift it. How you know a staircase is wrong before your foot confirms it. Your deepest intelligence has no language in it at all. We spent centuries convinced that thinking was the highest act of the mind. LeCun is pointing at something underneath it. Something older. Something the body learned long before the mouth could speak. Intelligence was never computation. It was accumulation. The slow, silent record of a life spent touching the world. The machine holds every word ever written about it. It has never once been in it. We keep asking whether it thinks. It cannot even tell us which “it” we mean.

Dustin

56,324 views • 3 months ago

Jensen Huang just described something that should keep every worker in America awake tonight. Not because AI is coming for their job. Because most of them never understood what their job actually was. Huang: “The task of our job and the purpose of our job are related, not the same.” Most people think their job is the thing they do with their hands for eight hours a day. Write code. Fill spreadsheets. Draft emails. Push pixels. That was never the job. That was the task. The job was always the thinking underneath it. Huang: “If you apply that to me, you would come to the conclusion what Jensen does for a living is tap on phones and talk. And tapping on phones and talking, AI has done that just fine. And therefore my job should be gone. But I’m busier than ever.” This is the part nobody wants to sit with. The people panicking about AI aren’t afraid of losing their work. They’re afraid of finding out they never had any. They had a routine. A repetitive motion. A series of keystrokes that felt like purpose. Now a machine does it in four seconds. Huang: “AI has created more than half a million jobs in the last couple of years.” The data says one thing. The fear says another. Because the fear was never about employment numbers. It was about identity. We spent fifty years hunched over keyboards, convinced the hunching was the work. Huang: “The idea that being human means to hunch over on this little thing, typing all the time… 50 years before that, people didn’t do that.” Fifty years. That’s all it took to build an entire identity around a posture. We don’t type for a living. We think for a living. We imagine for a living. The keyboard was always just the delivery mechanism. Never the product. Huang: “It is a fundamental flaw that we only need a billion lines of code written. We need a trillion lines of code written.” The demand was always infinite. The bottleneck was always our fingers. AI doesn’t shrink the workforce. It removes the cap on what the workforce can actually build. Huang: “Companies that use AI have demonstrated the ability to grow faster. When they grow faster, they hire more people.” Growth doesn’t eliminate people. It pulls them in. Every industrial revolution triggered the same panic. Same headlines. Same wrong conclusion. And every single time, the economy didn’t contract. It expanded into territory that didn’t exist before. The real question was never whether AI takes your job. It was whether you were ever anything more than the motions you repeated. Because somewhere in the last fifty years, we stopped asking what the work was for. We just kept typing. And now the typing is done. And millions of people are about to meet themselves for the first time. With nothing to hide behind. Some of them won’t survive what they find.

Jensen Huang just described something that should keep every worker in America awake tonight. Not because AI is coming for their job. Because most of them never understood what their job actually was. Huang: “The task of our job and the purpose of our job are related, not the same.” Most people think their job is the thing they do with their hands for eight hours a day. Write code. Fill spreadsheets. Draft emails. Push pixels. That was never the job. That was the task. The job was always the thinking underneath it. Huang: “If you apply that to me, you would come to the conclusion what Jensen does for a living is tap on phones and talk. And tapping on phones and talking, AI has done that just fine. And therefore my job should be gone. But I’m busier than ever.” This is the part nobody wants to sit with. The people panicking about AI aren’t afraid of losing their work. They’re afraid of finding out they never had any. They had a routine. A repetitive motion. A series of keystrokes that felt like purpose. Now a machine does it in four seconds. Huang: “AI has created more than half a million jobs in the last couple of years.” The data says one thing. The fear says another. Because the fear was never about employment numbers. It was about identity. We spent fifty years hunched over keyboards, convinced the hunching was the work. Huang: “The idea that being human means to hunch over on this little thing, typing all the time… 50 years before that, people didn’t do that.” Fifty years. That’s all it took to build an entire identity around a posture. We don’t type for a living. We think for a living. We imagine for a living. The keyboard was always just the delivery mechanism. Never the product. Huang: “It is a fundamental flaw that we only need a billion lines of code written. We need a trillion lines of code written.” The demand was always infinite. The bottleneck was always our fingers. AI doesn’t shrink the workforce. It removes the cap on what the workforce can actually build. Huang: “Companies that use AI have demonstrated the ability to grow faster. When they grow faster, they hire more people.” Growth doesn’t eliminate people. It pulls them in. Every industrial revolution triggered the same panic. Same headlines. Same wrong conclusion. And every single time, the economy didn’t contract. It expanded into territory that didn’t exist before. The real question was never whether AI takes your job. It was whether you were ever anything more than the motions you repeated. Because somewhere in the last fifty years, we stopped asking what the work was for. We just kept typing. And now the typing is done. And millions of people are about to meet themselves for the first time. With nothing to hide behind. Some of them won’t survive what they find.

Dustin

92,782 views • 4 months ago

MICROSOFT PUT THE ENTIRE SOURCE CODE OF WINDOWS INTO A SINGLE GIT REPO -- 300 GIGABYTES, 3.5 MILLION FILES AND MADE IT CLONE IN SECONDS 31 minutes from the Microsoft engineer who actually did it, bending the tool you use for a 50-file side project to hold the biggest codebase on the planet. -> The moment it lands, every excuse dies. You've heard "Git doesn't scale, use something else" your whole career. They ran git status on the largest repo alive and it came back instantly. The secret wasn't a different tool. It was understanding what git actually stores and realizing you never need the whole thing on disk. Pull only the files you touch. Ignore the 3.4 million you never will. Knowing the commands was never the ceiling -> understanding how git stores and moves things is what lets you do what everyone swears is impossible. And as AI agents spin up repos that balloon overnight, knowing how git scales is what keeps you from drowning in your own history. Everyone treats git like it maxes out at a hobby project. One team quietly proved it can hold an operating system. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

MICROSOFT PUT THE ENTIRE SOURCE CODE OF WINDOWS INTO A SINGLE GIT REPO -- 300 GIGABYTES, 3.5 MILLION FILES AND MADE IT CLONE IN SECONDS 31 minutes from the Microsoft engineer who actually did it, bending the tool you use for a 50-file side project to hold the biggest codebase on the planet. -> The moment it lands, every excuse dies. You've heard "Git doesn't scale, use something else" your whole career. They ran git status on the largest repo alive and it came back instantly. The secret wasn't a different tool. It was understanding what git actually stores and realizing you never need the whole thing on disk. Pull only the files you touch. Ignore the 3.4 million you never will. Knowing the commands was never the ceiling -> understanding how git stores and moves things is what lets you do what everyone swears is impossible. And as AI agents spin up repos that balloon overnight, knowing how git scales is what keeps you from drowning in your own history. Everyone treats git like it maxes out at a hobby project. One team quietly proved it can hold an operating system. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

slash1s

255,565 views • 3 months ago

Elon Musk just spent seventeen billion dollars to make every cell tower on Earth a relic. Musk: “It will allow SpaceX to deliver high bandwidth connectivity directly from the satellites to the phones.” Not through towers. Not through cables. Not through any infrastructure on the ground. Directly from orbit to the phone in your pocket. For over a century, connectivity followed the same blueprint. Build a tower. Run a cable. Expand the network one piece of ground at a time. Coverage went where the money was. Where the population density justified the investment. Everywhere else got silence. Four billion people still don’t have reliable internet. Not because the technology doesn’t exist. Because no one could justify building a tower where they live. Connectivity was never a technology problem. It was a geography problem disguised as one. Musk: “The phones that are able to use the spectrum that was acquired probably start shipping in around two years.” Two years. Then the phone in your hand connects straight to space. No tower required. No carrier infrastructure between you and the signal. The entire telecom industry was built on one assumption. That connectivity requires ground infrastructure. Every carrier. Every contract. Every coverage map. All products of that assumption. Starlink just bypassed it from orbit. From orbit, every point on Earth is equidistant. The word “remote” only exists because connectivity was built from the ground up. From space, there is no remote. There is no coverage gap. There is no place on Earth harder to reach than any other. The ground decides who gets connected based on where they are. The sky doesn’t know the difference. Human potential was always distributed evenly across the planet. Access to information never was. The gap between those two facts is the greatest waste in human history. We spent a century deciding who deserved access to information based on where they happened to be born. Musk just made that question obsolete from 550 kilometers above the answer.

Elon Musk just spent seventeen billion dollars to make every cell tower on Earth a relic. Musk: “It will allow SpaceX to deliver high bandwidth connectivity directly from the satellites to the phones.” Not through towers. Not through cables. Not through any infrastructure on the ground. Directly from orbit to the phone in your pocket. For over a century, connectivity followed the same blueprint. Build a tower. Run a cable. Expand the network one piece of ground at a time. Coverage went where the money was. Where the population density justified the investment. Everywhere else got silence. Four billion people still don’t have reliable internet. Not because the technology doesn’t exist. Because no one could justify building a tower where they live. Connectivity was never a technology problem. It was a geography problem disguised as one. Musk: “The phones that are able to use the spectrum that was acquired probably start shipping in around two years.” Two years. Then the phone in your hand connects straight to space. No tower required. No carrier infrastructure between you and the signal. The entire telecom industry was built on one assumption. That connectivity requires ground infrastructure. Every carrier. Every contract. Every coverage map. All products of that assumption. Starlink just bypassed it from orbit. From orbit, every point on Earth is equidistant. The word “remote” only exists because connectivity was built from the ground up. From space, there is no remote. There is no coverage gap. There is no place on Earth harder to reach than any other. The ground decides who gets connected based on where they are. The sky doesn’t know the difference. Human potential was always distributed evenly across the planet. Access to information never was. The gap between those two facts is the greatest waste in human history. We spent a century deciding who deserved access to information based on where they happened to be born. Musk just made that question obsolete from 550 kilometers above the answer.

Dustin

644,498 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk just told the highest-paid profession on earth it was never a skill. It was a workaround. AI no longer needs programming languages at all. It writes machine code directly. Raw binary optimized beyond anything human logic could produce. No syntax. No compiler. No translator. Musk: “You don’t even bother doing coding.” Every language ever written. Every framework ever built. Every career spent mastering them. All of it was humanity’s way of approximating what machines actually needed. We didn’t learn to speak to computers. We spent fifty years building a crutch because we couldn’t. AI just made the crutch irrelevant. Now add Neuralink. No keyboard. No screen. No interface. Musk: “Imagination-to-software.” Intention becomes execution. Nothing between what you imagine and what exists. Humanity spent its entire history building tools to shrink the gap between mind and reality. Language. Writing. Mathematics. Code. Every one was just a smaller bottleneck. AI doesn’t shrink the bottleneck. It removes the gap. The entire framework of technical expertise just collapsed into one question. Can you think clearly. Everyone else is debating how AI changes development. Musk already moved past the debate. He’s not optimizing the process. He’s dissolving the need for one. The barrier between imagination and reality held for all of human history. It just fell.

Elon Musk just told the highest-paid profession on earth it was never a skill. It was a workaround. AI no longer needs programming languages at all. It writes machine code directly. Raw binary optimized beyond anything human logic could produce. No syntax. No compiler. No translator. Musk: “You don’t even bother doing coding.” Every language ever written. Every framework ever built. Every career spent mastering them. All of it was humanity’s way of approximating what machines actually needed. We didn’t learn to speak to computers. We spent fifty years building a crutch because we couldn’t. AI just made the crutch irrelevant. Now add Neuralink. No keyboard. No screen. No interface. Musk: “Imagination-to-software.” Intention becomes execution. Nothing between what you imagine and what exists. Humanity spent its entire history building tools to shrink the gap between mind and reality. Language. Writing. Mathematics. Code. Every one was just a smaller bottleneck. AI doesn’t shrink the bottleneck. It removes the gap. The entire framework of technical expertise just collapsed into one question. Can you think clearly. Everyone else is debating how AI changes development. Musk already moved past the debate. He’s not optimizing the process. He’s dissolving the need for one. The barrier between imagination and reality held for all of human history. It just fell.

Dustin

136,160 views • 2 months ago

Demis Hassabis just told you exactly how he plans to build AGI. Hassabis: “The bottleneck in robotics isn’t so much the hardware. It’s actually the software intelligence that I think is always what’s held robotics back.” We’ve been building machine bodies for decades. Arms that weld. Legs that walk. Hands that grip. The body was never the problem. The mind was. Every other AI lab spent the last three years perfecting chatbots trapped inside a text box. Hassabis was building something meant to leave it. Hassabis: “We want it to be useful in your everyday life, for everything. And so it needs to come around you and understand your physical context.” Google didn’t build Gemini to win a benchmark war. They built it to exist in the physical world. Hassabis: “That’s why Gemini was built from the beginning, even the earliest versions, to be multimodal.” Every other lab started with text and stitched vision on after the fact. Gemini started with eyes, ears, and spatial awareness from day one. That decision looked slow in 2023. It looks prophetic now. Hassabis: “It made it harder at the start, because it’s harder to make things multimodal than just text-only. But in the end, I think we’re reaping the benefits of those decisions now.” The hard road and the right road were the same road. Everyone else optimized for the demo. Hassabis optimized for the destination. And the destination was never a better chatbot. It was a mind that could pilot a body. Hassabis: “AGI needs to be able to do all of those things.” That single sentence is the thesis behind everything DeepMind has built. AGI doesn’t live in a chat window. AGI walks into a room. Sees what’s there. Moves through space. Reads context no prompt can capture. The companies building the smartest text engine will dominate the next two years. The company building the first real mind will dominate the next twenty. Hassabis isn’t racing to build a better assistant. He’s racing to build the thing that makes assistants obsolete. He laid out the entire blueprint. On camera. In plain English. Most people won’t realize what they heard until it’s already built.

Demis Hassabis just told you exactly how he plans to build AGI. Hassabis: “The bottleneck in robotics isn’t so much the hardware. It’s actually the software intelligence that I think is always what’s held robotics back.” We’ve been building machine bodies for decades. Arms that weld. Legs that walk. Hands that grip. The body was never the problem. The mind was. Every other AI lab spent the last three years perfecting chatbots trapped inside a text box. Hassabis was building something meant to leave it. Hassabis: “We want it to be useful in your everyday life, for everything. And so it needs to come around you and understand your physical context.” Google didn’t build Gemini to win a benchmark war. They built it to exist in the physical world. Hassabis: “That’s why Gemini was built from the beginning, even the earliest versions, to be multimodal.” Every other lab started with text and stitched vision on after the fact. Gemini started with eyes, ears, and spatial awareness from day one. That decision looked slow in 2023. It looks prophetic now. Hassabis: “It made it harder at the start, because it’s harder to make things multimodal than just text-only. But in the end, I think we’re reaping the benefits of those decisions now.” The hard road and the right road were the same road. Everyone else optimized for the demo. Hassabis optimized for the destination. And the destination was never a better chatbot. It was a mind that could pilot a body. Hassabis: “AGI needs to be able to do all of those things.” That single sentence is the thesis behind everything DeepMind has built. AGI doesn’t live in a chat window. AGI walks into a room. Sees what’s there. Moves through space. Reads context no prompt can capture. The companies building the smartest text engine will dominate the next two years. The company building the first real mind will dominate the next twenty. Hassabis isn’t racing to build a better assistant. He’s racing to build the thing that makes assistants obsolete. He laid out the entire blueprint. On camera. In plain English. Most people won’t realize what they heard until it’s already built.

Dustin

12,383 views • 4 months ago

The biggest improvement ever made to the most complex machine in human history came from a guy holding a camera. Not a propulsion engineer. Not a systems architect. Not anyone on the SpaceX payroll. A YouTuber named Tim Dodd. Dodd was touring Starbase when Musk explained how they eliminated the entire cold gas thruster system on the Super Heavy booster. Instead of a separate mechanism with its own weight and its own failure points, they just vented hot gas straight from the propellant tanks. Zero added weight. Zero extra parts. Dodd asked one question. “But this is only for the booster, right?” Musk stopped. Musk: “Although, arguably, now you mentioned it, it might be wise to do this for the ship too. We’re gonna fix that.” Seven months later, Musk confirmed it was one of the biggest improvements ever made to the vehicle. That moment should have been impossible. Thousands of the most brilliant aerospace minds alive work at SpaceX. They designed this system. Reviewed it. Tested it. Shipped it. Defended it in rooms where challenging the architecture has a cost. None of them asked the question. Not because they were stupid. Because they were expert. We worship expertise. We hire for it. We pay for it. We promote for it. We have built entire civilizations on the assumption that the person who understands a problem most deeply is the one most qualified to solve it. But depth is not the same thing as sight. Expertise is not a straight line toward truth. It is a circle. You learn enough to solve the problem. Then you learn enough to justify the solution. Then you learn enough to defend the justification. And eventually you know so much about why things are the way they are that you lose the ability to ask whether they should be. The SpaceX engineers understood exactly why the cold gas thrusters existed on the ship. Thermal constraints. Attitude control requirements. Heritage design logic. They had context and history and institutional memory and ten perfectly valid reasons the ship was different from the booster. Every single one of those reasons was a wall between them and the obvious. Dodd had none of it. No history telling him the question was already answered. No career incentive to leave the architecture alone. No knowledge of why things were the way they were. He just had the question. And the question was right. The cold gas system on the ship was not a mistake anyone was hiding. It was a mistake nobody could see. Because the only way to see it was to know less. Not more. Now think about your own expertise. The thing you have built or maintained or defended longer than anyone around you. The system you understand so deeply that nobody questions your judgment on it anymore. What is the question nobody around you is asking? Not because it is hard. Because it is so simple it feels beneath the room. That question is probably worth more than everything your smartest people have produced this quarter. And right now it is sitting in the mouth of someone you would never think to invite to the meeting. The rocket got lighter because someone didn’t know he wasn’t supposed to ask. Most expertise will spend its entire life making sure no one does.

The biggest improvement ever made to the most complex machine in human history came from a guy holding a camera. Not a propulsion engineer. Not a systems architect. Not anyone on the SpaceX payroll. A YouTuber named Tim Dodd. Dodd was touring Starbase when Musk explained how they eliminated the entire cold gas thruster system on the Super Heavy booster. Instead of a separate mechanism with its own weight and its own failure points, they just vented hot gas straight from the propellant tanks. Zero added weight. Zero extra parts. Dodd asked one question. “But this is only for the booster, right?” Musk stopped. Musk: “Although, arguably, now you mentioned it, it might be wise to do this for the ship too. We’re gonna fix that.” Seven months later, Musk confirmed it was one of the biggest improvements ever made to the vehicle. That moment should have been impossible. Thousands of the most brilliant aerospace minds alive work at SpaceX. They designed this system. Reviewed it. Tested it. Shipped it. Defended it in rooms where challenging the architecture has a cost. None of them asked the question. Not because they were stupid. Because they were expert. We worship expertise. We hire for it. We pay for it. We promote for it. We have built entire civilizations on the assumption that the person who understands a problem most deeply is the one most qualified to solve it. But depth is not the same thing as sight. Expertise is not a straight line toward truth. It is a circle. You learn enough to solve the problem. Then you learn enough to justify the solution. Then you learn enough to defend the justification. And eventually you know so much about why things are the way they are that you lose the ability to ask whether they should be. The SpaceX engineers understood exactly why the cold gas thrusters existed on the ship. Thermal constraints. Attitude control requirements. Heritage design logic. They had context and history and institutional memory and ten perfectly valid reasons the ship was different from the booster. Every single one of those reasons was a wall between them and the obvious. Dodd had none of it. No history telling him the question was already answered. No career incentive to leave the architecture alone. No knowledge of why things were the way they were. He just had the question. And the question was right. The cold gas system on the ship was not a mistake anyone was hiding. It was a mistake nobody could see. Because the only way to see it was to know less. Not more. Now think about your own expertise. The thing you have built or maintained or defended longer than anyone around you. The system you understand so deeply that nobody questions your judgment on it anymore. What is the question nobody around you is asking? Not because it is hard. Because it is so simple it feels beneath the room. That question is probably worth more than everything your smartest people have produced this quarter. And right now it is sitting in the mouth of someone you would never think to invite to the meeting. The rocket got lighter because someone didn’t know he wasn’t supposed to ask. Most expertise will spend its entire life making sure no one does.

Dustin

75,672 views • 3 months ago

I grew up hating cops. My father was Sonny Franzese, underboss of the Colombo family, and I spent my whole life on the opposite side of the badge. So when I sat down with Kevin Donaldson — a New Jersey cop who got shot on the job and came home a different man — we got into something most people never see: what that life really does to you. The mob and the badge look like opposite worlds, but the dark truth is what they have in common. The trauma. The things you can’t unsee. The hidden cost nobody warns you about. Kevin will tell you what cops carry that they never talk about, why he says it’s worse than anything I witnessed on the street, and how a man comes back from the edge. Two opposite sides of crime. One conversation. This one stayed with me. Salud.

I grew up hating cops. My father was Sonny Franzese, underboss of the Colombo family, and I spent my whole life on the opposite side of the badge. So when I sat down with Kevin Donaldson — a New Jersey cop who got shot on the job and came home a different man — we got into something most people never see: what that life really does to you. The mob and the badge look like opposite worlds, but the dark truth is what they have in common. The trauma. The things you can’t unsee. The hidden cost nobody warns you about. Kevin will tell you what cops carry that they never talk about, why he says it’s worse than anything I witnessed on the street, and how a man comes back from the edge. Two opposite sides of crime. One conversation. This one stayed with me. Salud.

Michael Franzese

56,211 views • 2 months ago