Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

A local in Jordan reportedly found what appears to be an important component from a THAAD interceptor—the infrared seeker. Small in size, this component plays a crucial role in helping the interceptor track an incoming ballistic missile during the terminal phase. THAAD uses a hit-to-kill approach rather than a... show more

Srijan Pal Singh

53,675 subscribers

16,679 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 Kommentare

Profilbild von Bharat Jaiswal

Bharat Jaiswalvor 3 Tagen

Ye already china pohoch chuka hoga 😉

Profilbild von 𝐁𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐢 𝐒𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 𝐉𝐞𝐧𝐚 𝕏

𝐁𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐢 𝐒𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐚𝐫 𝐉𝐞𝐧𝐚 𝕏vor 4 Tagen

Interesting find, if the identification is confirmed. THAAD’s effectiveness depends heavily on the integration of detection, tracking and precision guidance not simply the interceptor itself. Any recovery of sensitive components from an operational system also highlights the importance of battlefield security and technology protection. Modern missile defence is as much about information and precision as it is about speed. 🇺🇸

Profilbild von Humanity s only religion

Humanity s only religionvor 4 Tagen

सिंह साहेब हरियाणा में एक कहावत है जो आज के आपके एपिसोड का सार है “ हथियार उसान का”

Ähnliche Videos

The kill vehicle from a U.S. THAAD missile interceptor was recovered in southern Syria (Suwayda) after a recent interception. This component is the non-explosive part that destroys targets by direct high-speed impact (“hit-to-kill”). It likely fell back to Syria intact after completing or failing its mission, which is possible since THAAD carries no warhead.

The kill vehicle from a U.S. THAAD missile interceptor was recovered in southern Syria (Suwayda) after a recent interception. This component is the non-explosive part that destroys targets by direct high-speed impact (“hit-to-kill”). It likely fell back to Syria intact after completing or failing its mission, which is possible since THAAD carries no warhead.

Clash Report

88,971 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Locals in the Suwayda countryside of Syria found a kill vehicle from a MIM‑401 (Talon) interceptor of the U.S. THAAD anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system.

Locals in the Suwayda countryside of Syria found a kill vehicle from a MIM‑401 (Talon) interceptor of the U.S. THAAD anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system.

OSINTWarfare

44,482 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This footage shows the seeker of an interceptor from a U.S. Army THAAD anti-ballistic missile system, found in western Jordan several months ago. The two U.S. Army THAAD batteries deployed in Israel have not engaged any Iranian ballistic missiles in recent months, as the IRGC has not launched ballistic missiles toward Israel during this period. The wreckage therefore belongs to one of the THAAD interceptors launched during the Iranian ballistic missile attacks in March or April.

This footage shows the seeker of an interceptor from a U.S. Army THAAD anti-ballistic missile system, found in western Jordan several months ago. The two U.S. Army THAAD batteries deployed in Israel have not engaged any Iranian ballistic missiles in recent months, as the IRGC has not launched ballistic missiles toward Israel during this period. The wreckage therefore belongs to one of the THAAD interceptors launched during the Iranian ballistic missile attacks in March or April.

Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch

35,288 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

🇺🇸🇷🇺 THAAD vs S-400: TWO VERY DIFFERENT AIR DEFENSE PHILOSOPHIES THAAD and Russia’s S-400 are often compared as if they perform the same mission. Technically, that is misleading. THAAD is primarily a dedicated ballistic missile defense system. Its interceptor uses hit to kill technology, meaning it destroys the incoming warhead through direct kinetic impact rather than relying on a conventional explosive warhead. It is designed to engage ballistic missiles during their terminal phase, including both inside and just outside the atmosphere. Its AN/TPY-2 X band radar provides high resolution tracking and target discrimination, allowing the system to distinguish the actual reentry vehicle from other objects and continuously update the interceptor with precise tracking data. S-400 follows a different philosophy. It is a multi role long range air defense architecture designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and selected ballistic missile threats using different interceptor missiles. Its strength is not simply the advertised maximum range, but the combination of multiple radars, command and control, mobile launchers and different missile types. This creates a major technical distinction: THAAD = specialized upper tier ballistic missile defense S-400 = broader long range integrated air defense THAAD's interceptor is optimized for the difficult terminal ballistic missile problem, where the target may be travelling at extremely high velocity and descending rapidly toward the defended area. S-400's architecture is optimized for flexibility, allowing commanders to select different interceptors depending on target type, altitude and engagement geometry. The real question therefore isn't "Which system has the longer range?" It is: Which system is better suited to the threat? Against ballistic missile warheads, THAAD's architecture is specifically optimized for the mission. Against a mixed package of aircraft, cruise missiles and other aerial targets, S-400 offers a much broader engagement envelope. And in a modern war, neither system is supposed to operate alone. The real advantage comes from layered defense, where long range sensors, command networks, THAAD, Patriot or other systems work together. Range is only one number. Radar architecture, target discrimination, interceptor kinematics, engagement altitude, reaction time, saturation capacity and network integration ultimately determine whether an air defense system survives a real missile raid.

Defense Intelligence

12,393 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A highly sensitive Pentagon missile component, reportedly from a $15 million THAAD interceptor, has been found intact near the Jordan-Syria border. The component is associated with the missile’s target-locking system. Its recovery could raise serious concerns over the security of U.S. missile technology, possible intelligence exploitation, and whether adversaries could study the component to better understand or counter THAAD’s capabilities. It may be China, Russia or Iran get it and start reverse engineering.

A highly sensitive Pentagon missile component, reportedly from a $15 million THAAD interceptor, has been found intact near the Jordan-Syria border. The component is associated with the missile’s target-locking system. Its recovery could raise serious concerns over the security of U.S. missile technology, possible intelligence exploitation, and whether adversaries could study the component to better understand or counter THAAD’s capabilities. It may be China, Russia or Iran get it and start reverse engineering.

Baba Banaras™

12,767 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Iran reportedly launched ballistic missiles toward U.S. military bases in Jordan, with the attack involving a cluster-type warhead—reportedly the first such use since the clashes in April. As the missile approached its target, its warhead reportedly released multiple submunitions, creating several threats during the terminal phase. That can make an already difficult interception problem even more complicated. Instead of tracking and engaging a single incoming missile, air-defence systems may have to deal with multiple objects appearing close to the target, while another wave of ballistic missiles is arriving at roughly the same time. The episode highlights the challenge of saturation attacks: modern missile defence isn't just about how advanced the interceptor is—it’s also about whether the entire network can handle the number, timing and complexity of threats arriving simultaneously. #iran #IranWar #missiles #ClusterMunitions #jordan #MissileStrike

Iran reportedly launched ballistic missiles toward U.S. military bases in Jordan, with the attack involving a cluster-type warhead—reportedly the first such use since the clashes in April. As the missile approached its target, its warhead reportedly released multiple submunitions, creating several threats during the terminal phase. That can make an already difficult interception problem even more complicated. Instead of tracking and engaging a single incoming missile, air-defence systems may have to deal with multiple objects appearing close to the target, while another wave of ballistic missiles is arriving at roughly the same time. The episode highlights the challenge of saturation attacks: modern missile defence isn't just about how advanced the interceptor is—it’s also about whether the entire network can handle the number, timing and complexity of threats arriving simultaneously. #iran #IranWar #missiles #ClusterMunitions #jordan #MissileStrike

Srijan Pal Singh

12,397 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

From what I can ascertain 1) 1 ballistic missile intercepted by THAAD over Jerusalem, fragments from the reentry vehicle & interceptor landed in Ma'ale Adumim and al-Khader 2) 1 missile intercepted over Tel Aviv, the other contained a cluster warhead that released submunitions, with some landing in the city center (including an unspecified "important" base) while others landed in open fields 3) One ballistic missile intercepted over Hadera, another apparently landed in the ocean

From what I can ascertain 1) 1 ballistic missile intercepted by THAAD over Jerusalem, fragments from the reentry vehicle & interceptor landed in Ma'ale Adumim and al-Khader 2) 1 missile intercepted over Tel Aviv, the other contained a cluster warhead that released submunitions, with some landing in the city center (including an unspecified "important" base) while others landed in open fields 3) One ballistic missile intercepted over Hadera, another apparently landed in the ocean

Theti Mapping

11,262 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Unrelenting Iranian missile attack on Tel Aviv According to videos published about tonight's missile attacks on Israel, the missiles hit their targets without any problems or interference from Israeli or American interceptors! Considering the successful elimination of most THAAD radar systems by Iran and a significant reduction in interceptor missile stocks, Iran and Hezbollah are carrying out more precise strikes. 🔵Israeli media: Iran launched a fissile missile towards Israel

Unrelenting Iranian missile attack on Tel Aviv According to videos published about tonight's missile attacks on Israel, the missiles hit their targets without any problems or interference from Israeli or American interceptors! Considering the successful elimination of most THAAD radar systems by Iran and a significant reduction in interceptor missile stocks, Iran and Hezbollah are carrying out more precise strikes. 🔵Israeli media: Iran launched a fissile missile towards Israel

Sprinter Press

11,731 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇮🇱 WATCH: Israel’s layered air defense in action: A Stunner interceptor from David’s Sling attempts a high-altitude intercept but misses an incoming Iranian ballistic missile warhead. Moments later, an Iron Dome Tamir interceptor engages on a low, near-horizontal trajectory—successfully destroying the warhead at the edge of its operational limits. Selena 🇮🇱 Stay connected, follow Mossad Commentary.

🇮🇱 WATCH: Israel’s layered air defense in action: A Stunner interceptor from David’s Sling attempts a high-altitude intercept but misses an incoming Iranian ballistic missile warhead. Moments later, an Iron Dome Tamir interceptor engages on a low, near-horizontal trajectory—successfully destroying the warhead at the edge of its operational limits. Selena 🇮🇱 Stay connected, follow Mossad Commentary.

Mossad Commentary

28,515 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A video circulating online reportedly shows a missile interceptor malfunctioning during an attempt to intercept a missile, which then hit the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan on Tuesday.

A video circulating online reportedly shows a missile interceptor malfunctioning during an attempt to intercept a missile, which then hit the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan on Tuesday.

Middle East Eye

17,593 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BREAKING: One of the surface-to-air missiles belonging to a THAAD battery of the U.S. Army protecting Israel has been found crashed in Suwayda, Syria. Its seeker section has survived the crash and could potentially be shared with Russia and China for reverse engineering. The system appears to be equipped with an infrared sensor used to detect ballistic missiles and trigger the proximity fuse. #OperationEpicFury #OperationLionsRoar

BREAKING: One of the surface-to-air missiles belonging to a THAAD battery of the U.S. Army protecting Israel has been found crashed in Suwayda, Syria. Its seeker section has survived the crash and could potentially be shared with Russia and China for reverse engineering. The system appears to be equipped with an infrared sensor used to detect ballistic missiles and trigger the proximity fuse. #OperationEpicFury #OperationLionsRoar

Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch

632,984 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇺🇸 PATRIOT & THAAD MISSILE PRODUCTION TO TRIPLE — PENTAGON 👉Lockheed Martin will produce Patriots & THAAD interceptor missiles to replenish US stockpiles strained by conflicts in the 🇮🇷Middle East & 🇺🇦Ukraine ($58.6BN contract); 👉 Northrop Grumman will produce solid rocket motors, ignition safety devices & high-temperature structural components ($3BN contract). there will be a new phase in Iran & Ukraine?

🇺🇸 PATRIOT & THAAD MISSILE PRODUCTION TO TRIPLE — PENTAGON 👉Lockheed Martin will produce Patriots & THAAD interceptor missiles to replenish US stockpiles strained by conflicts in the 🇮🇷Middle East & 🇺🇦Ukraine ($58.6BN contract); 👉 Northrop Grumman will produce solid rocket motors, ignition safety devices & high-temperature structural components ($3BN contract). there will be a new phase in Iran & Ukraine?

Lord Bebo

19,203 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Iran's Kheibar Shekan is a solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile that can be launched within minutes, making it much harder to detect before launch than older liquid-fuel systems. Reports also suggest that some versions may have a maneuverable terminal-phase warhead, potentially making interception more difficult. According to reports, Iran often combines these missiles with drones and other ballistic missiles in saturation attacks, increasing the burden on air defence systems. While many incoming missiles may be intercepted, each interception can require expensive interceptor missiles, making missile defence costly over time. Several claims about the missile's capabilities and combat performance remain based on reports and official statements and have not been independently verified. #iran #IranWar #missiles #MissileStrike #MissileDefense

Iran's Kheibar Shekan is a solid-fuel medium-range ballistic missile that can be launched within minutes, making it much harder to detect before launch than older liquid-fuel systems. Reports also suggest that some versions may have a maneuverable terminal-phase warhead, potentially making interception more difficult. According to reports, Iran often combines these missiles with drones and other ballistic missiles in saturation attacks, increasing the burden on air defence systems. While many incoming missiles may be intercepted, each interception can require expensive interceptor missiles, making missile defence costly over time. Several claims about the missile's capabilities and combat performance remain based on reports and official statements and have not been independently verified. #iran #IranWar #missiles #MissileStrike #MissileDefense

Srijan Pal Singh

20,708 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Footage circulating online appears to show an Iranian ballistic missile continuing toward its target despite numerous interceptor launches. While the exact number of interceptors involved and the outcome cannot be independently verified from publicly available footage alone, the incident has renewed debate over the limits of modern air defence systems. Modern ballistic missiles may also employ maneuverable re-entry vehicles (MaRVs), making their final trajectory less predictable and increasing the complexity of interception. In saturation attacks, multiple incoming missiles can further strain an air defence network by forcing it to engage several threats simultaneously. Could future ballistic missiles become even harder to intercept? And as offensive missile technology advances, can air defence systems continue to keep pace? #iran #IranWar #missiles #MissileDefense #MissileStrike

Footage circulating online appears to show an Iranian ballistic missile continuing toward its target despite numerous interceptor launches. While the exact number of interceptors involved and the outcome cannot be independently verified from publicly available footage alone, the incident has renewed debate over the limits of modern air defence systems. Modern ballistic missiles may also employ maneuverable re-entry vehicles (MaRVs), making their final trajectory less predictable and increasing the complexity of interception. In saturation attacks, multiple incoming missiles can further strain an air defence network by forcing it to engage several threats simultaneously. Could future ballistic missiles become even harder to intercept? And as offensive missile technology advances, can air defence systems continue to keep pace? #iran #IranWar #missiles #MissileDefense #MissileStrike

Srijan Pal Singh

30,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

U.S. company Mara has presented its Spike counter-drone system, designed to defend against FPV drones. The system consists of two main components: the Spotter detection module, which uses visual and acoustic sensors to identify incoming drones, and the Seeker interceptor UAV. The Seeker reportedly has a maximum speed of up to 200 km/h (124 mph) and an operational range of approximately 1.5 km (0.9 miles). Mara estimates the complete Spike system will cost between $30,000 and $100,000, depending on the number of Seeker interceptors included. A single system can reportedly accommodate up to 48 interceptors. The company says the interceptor itself is intended to cost approximately the same as its target, or up to twice as much. A stationary version of Spike is planned for late 2026, while vehicle-mounted and portable versions using manual launch are expected in 2027. The system reportedly underwent testing in Ukraine in July 2026. #USA #Mara #Spike #CounterUAS #CounterDrone #FPV #Drones #DroneWarfare #Interceptor #MilitaryTechnology #Defense

U.S. company Mara has presented its Spike counter-drone system, designed to defend against FPV drones. The system consists of two main components: the Spotter detection module, which uses visual and acoustic sensors to identify incoming drones, and the Seeker interceptor UAV. The Seeker reportedly has a maximum speed of up to 200 km/h (124 mph) and an operational range of approximately 1.5 km (0.9 miles). Mara estimates the complete Spike system will cost between $30,000 and $100,000, depending on the number of Seeker interceptors included. A single system can reportedly accommodate up to 48 interceptors. The company says the interceptor itself is intended to cost approximately the same as its target, or up to twice as much. A stationary version of Spike is planned for late 2026, while vehicle-mounted and portable versions using manual launch are expected in 2027. The system reportedly underwent testing in Ukraine in July 2026. #USA #Mara #Spike #CounterUAS #CounterDrone #FPV #Drones #DroneWarfare #Interceptor #MilitaryTechnology #Defense

Drone Wars

26,863 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

🇺🇸🇮🇱12 DAYS, 80 MISSILES, 20% OF U.S. THAAD STOCK GONE IN ISRAEL-IRAN WAR During its defense of Israel, the U.S. launched 60 to 80 THAAD interceptors, burning through 15–20% of its global inventory in less than 2 weeks. Each interceptor costs $12–15 million, putting the total price tag between $810 million and $1.2 billion. With only 7 THAAD systems deployed worldwide and an eighth on the way, that's a massive chunk of the arsenal gone in days. High-altitude defense doesn’t come cheap - especially at that pace. Source: Post Millennial

🇺🇸🇮🇱12 DAYS, 80 MISSILES, 20% OF U.S. THAAD STOCK GONE IN ISRAEL-IRAN WAR During its defense of Israel, the U.S. launched 60 to 80 THAAD interceptors, burning through 15–20% of its global inventory in less than 2 weeks. Each interceptor costs $12–15 million, putting the total price tag between $810 million and $1.2 billion. With only 7 THAAD systems deployed worldwide and an eighth on the way, that's a massive chunk of the arsenal gone in days. High-altitude defense doesn’t come cheap - especially at that pace. Source: Post Millennial

Mario Nawfal

425,060 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Why Are U.S. Air Defenses Struggling to Stop Iranian Missiles? The U.S. and its allies have deployed some of the world's most advanced missile defenses, including THAAD and Patriot, yet Iranian missiles have still managed to penetrate the defensive shield. The issue may not be that Patriot or THAAD are completely ineffective. The bigger challenges include large missile salvos, limited interceptor stocks, short reaction times and possible damage to radars and air defense infrastructure. Iran may also be attempting to overwhelm the network through saturation attacks, forcing defenders to spend expensive interceptors against waves of incoming missiles. The key question is no longer whether U.S. air defenses can intercept Iranian missiles. They can. The real question is whether the U.S. and its allies have enough interceptors, radars and operational launchers to sustain the defense during a prolonged missile war.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Why Are U.S. Air Defenses Struggling to Stop Iranian Missiles? The U.S. and its allies have deployed some of the world's most advanced missile defenses, including THAAD and Patriot, yet Iranian missiles have still managed to penetrate the defensive shield. The issue may not be that Patriot or THAAD are completely ineffective. The bigger challenges include large missile salvos, limited interceptor stocks, short reaction times and possible damage to radars and air defense infrastructure. Iran may also be attempting to overwhelm the network through saturation attacks, forcing defenders to spend expensive interceptors against waves of incoming missiles. The key question is no longer whether U.S. air defenses can intercept Iranian missiles. They can. The real question is whether the U.S. and its allies have enough interceptors, radars and operational launchers to sustain the defense during a prolonged missile war.

Defense Intelligence

26,363 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is the eye of a missile built before GPS and artificial intelligence. This is the laser seeker head from an AGM-65C/E Maverick, a precision air-to-ground missile that entered service in the early 1970s. Behind this small optical window is a complete guidance system designed to find and track a target using nothing but reflected laser energy. The missile itself does not know where the target is even when fired. A laser designator illuminates the target, the seeker detects the reflected laser signal, and Hidden inside the seeker is a precision gyro spinning at 24,000+ RPM, stabilising the optics so the missile could keep tracking a tiny reflected laser spot through vibration, acceleration, and supersonic flight. Built in an era of analog electronics, the seeker had to process signals, maintain optical alignment, and guide a missile travelling around Mach 1.2 without modern processors, GPS, or digital imaging systems. An AGM-65 Maverick cost an incredible $20,000-40,000 in 1970s production and became one of the most widely used precision strike weapons in aviation history. What looks like a small optical assembly is actually a mechanical and electronic eye that gave aircraft the ability to hit targets from kilometres away with unprecedented accuracy decades before today’s smart beyond visual range missiles. 🎥tonyturi

This is the eye of a missile built before GPS and artificial intelligence. This is the laser seeker head from an AGM-65C/E Maverick, a precision air-to-ground missile that entered service in the early 1970s. Behind this small optical window is a complete guidance system designed to find and track a target using nothing but reflected laser energy. The missile itself does not know where the target is even when fired. A laser designator illuminates the target, the seeker detects the reflected laser signal, and Hidden inside the seeker is a precision gyro spinning at 24,000+ RPM, stabilising the optics so the missile could keep tracking a tiny reflected laser spot through vibration, acceleration, and supersonic flight. Built in an era of analog electronics, the seeker had to process signals, maintain optical alignment, and guide a missile travelling around Mach 1.2 without modern processors, GPS, or digital imaging systems. An AGM-65 Maverick cost an incredible $20,000-40,000 in 1970s production and became one of the most widely used precision strike weapons in aviation history. What looks like a small optical assembly is actually a mechanical and electronic eye that gave aircraft the ability to hit targets from kilometres away with unprecedented accuracy decades before today’s smart beyond visual range missiles. 🎥tonyturi

Ammanichanda

260,727 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten