Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
A major exploit has been discovered on the World of Warcraft Forever beta dozens of tauren hunters have been found at extremely low levels in areas like Winterspring and Tanaris. the theory goes that they're using their new racial ability to essentially clone copies of herbs like Black Lotus,... show more
188,554 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)
40 Comments
I love this, bots are getting into a BETA, exposing all the exploits, so that the devs can patch them so the bots don't fuck up the release. Great job from the idiots once again.
its awesome, glad the beta is happening
First, publicly admit that they have a bot problem.
they should hire 1 gm at launch i bet they will and itll solve it all
Frankly, I don’t think that’s enough. I want Blizzard quest-quality bounties available in all major cities for killing bots. Make seasonal campaigns rewards incentivizing guilds to go scorched earth.
The question is,,,, Why bot always one step ahead??? They like knowing what game is Insider?? Idk
they datamine the game
Wonder if theres a way for them to lvl range the cultivation like they do dungeon ranges
id say just tie it to level brackets. 1-35 anything in early zones. 35+ endgame zones
You know its a beta, right? A beta is exactly for this kinda stuff?
great point per jespersen, glad they are doing it
Weird, i have a tauren. I assumed this let you get an extra herb with herbalism, not flat out gather them without the profession. So this lets them gather without having maxed professions. Whoops
Seems like the easiest fix is to make the buff reset with any stopage
oooo yes i like that. or just make it not work on endgame herbs unless you are lvl 35+
Even if they fix this racial so that isnt possible, the bigger problem is just the bots in general. Blizzard needs to get a handle on the botting problem or they will have yet another mode ruined by them.
@AggrendWoW Hi! Can we expect that bot problem will be solved? Few live GMs activly banning this bots would solve issue
They should only be able to grow herbs that align with their level. You have to be 225 herb to pick Black Lotus if I recall.
I feel like they’ll make the racial have a long cooldown and make it only give silver leaf/peacebloom no matter where you’re at 😬
they have problems with cheaters who paid to play the game btw
This is what the Beta is for. Glad they found it
Kinda like you duplicated Xaryu's background
Glad they exploited it in beta now wow can fix it lmao
There is a huge bug where mobs have a very low aggro range, so you can walk without any problems to high lvl zones.
when i join the beta all i see is chinese players training their bots
Anecdotally, I saw someone /who winterspring and it was populated almost exclusively by Tauren with names in Hanzi. I dunno if there’s a correct solution, but having a supply of cheap black lotus wouldn’t suck. 🤷♂️
Blizzard won't fix anything. 1 bot = 1 sub which is money in their pocket, they dont give a fuuuuck - nevermind they are already botting retail for WoW tokens
well the limit is still level 20 so farming black lotus is useless
Prolly delete Taurens. 🤷♀️
It’s a honeypot for bots
the lvl is capped at 20 atm for mac profs u gotta be 35 so u cant get black lotus atm
Man, what a bummer if this was Live, but thankfully it's Beta. That said... I wonder how proactive the devs will be this time trying to stop the massive community of gold sellers who are going to want in on this.
There’s a vendor that sells black lotus for 50g
It’s a 30 min cool down lol
Good. Clean this shit up before release. The last thing I want is the AH to be ruined straight out the gate.
I was thinking why not have a level range? BLotus maybe 55-60 or higher. Have the herbs be based on your level that you can cultivate. Maybe for other less valuable ones start at 50. Keep within level range of what you can make with alch or actually use at your level.
I mean ppl doing the chest exploit they got rid of for sod so I'ma just assume it's beta and they care more about volume than micro fixing. Bet you there will be a full length novel if changes for launch.
Why would they even bother doing this? Everyone's character is going to be wiped in a couple weeks when beta ends
I love that people exploit the shit out of this. Imagine they did that at launch. This way blizz can fix it
All Chinese names lmao. The jokes write themselves.
What's the racial ability?
![[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2064130794973774042/amplify_video_thumb/2063015130917732352/img/1I_Up7yZ_LcHIuXv.jpg)
![.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2056561012921471241/amplify_video_thumb/2056560945489465344/img/WImukXIGuOvKPqeT.jpg)
