正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

A man pulls out a gun on a NYC train during a verbal dispute. No visible threat. No physical altercation. Just words. Then someone claims, “He showed a badge.” But here’s the question nobody can ignore: Was he really law enforcement? Because if he was, this directly contradicts New...

progressiveact's profile picture

Tramell Thompson

10,450 subscribers

150,945 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

30 条评论

joe 的头像
joe8 个月前

no visible threat? are u serious?

Ranger 175 的头像
Ranger 1758 个月前

Maybe he is tired of black men being violent assholes

Derick 的头像
Derick8 个月前

Around blacks never relax

PNWGUERRILLA 的头像
PNWGUERRILLA8 个月前

“No visible threat” is fucking hilarious tbh

Mel 的头像
Mel8 个月前

You’re just upset that it wasn’t a black or brown criminal with a gun

Matthew 的头像
Matthew8 个月前

Thinking this is reckless and not thinking that the guy who is being aggressive and threatening is not reckless is absolutely ridiculous. I really wonder what goes through your head thinking that someone doesn’t have a right to pull a weapon on someone who’s acting like that.

Finesser 的头像
Finesser8 个月前

Bro how tf people can protect themselves this man seems very aggressive looking for problems I wouldve done the same if I had a gun. Fck wrong with you man.

Bee Tess 的头像
Bee Tess8 个月前

No visible threat? You’re a fucking idiot

Jared Francis 的头像
Jared Francis8 个月前

Totally illegal to conceal carry on the subway in NYC.

Austin Titus 的头像
Austin Titus8 个月前

My life is more important than yours, my gun knows that as well.

Serpentarian 的头像
Serpentarian8 个月前

Well well well

National Identity Awareness 的头像
National Identity Awareness8 个月前

This ⚫️ slashed her throat and nobody budged. Whats your point you stupid ⚫️?

James Bjorlie 的头像
James Bjorlie8 个月前

We aren't putting up with random harassment and menacing anymore Self-defense is an integral human right If he did something wrong, he will have his day court, but he must have the right to defend his own life

Dangerfield 的头像
Dangerfield8 个月前

To you, that black guy's attitude & demeanor seems normal & unthreatening. That says more about you than the guy de-escalating the situation by pulling out his firearm.

Myk XIII 的头像
Myk XIII8 个月前

Maybe leave people the fuck alone.

Kelvin Jeffries 的头像
Kelvin Jeffries8 个月前

I think some people are getting a false sense of security with their firearms. Who pulls a gun on a subway, too many bystanders to get hit by a ricochet

Joel Ramirez - Lt. douche bag. 的头像
Joel Ramirez - Lt. douche bag.8 个月前

Only police officers, peace officers, and retired law enforcement officers holding HR 218 are authorized to carry firearms in the subway system. All other individuals with concealed carry permits are not allowed.

Fredrico Suava 的头像
Fredrico Suava8 个月前

Blacks hate white people, blacks are the modern day racists. Did you say no visible threat?!?!? There is a black man on a train, that’s all the red flag I need to have my hand on my gun! You’re all cowards!!!!

Pay Roll Manager Here 的头像
Pay Roll Manager Here8 个月前

You’re an idiot

Bean 的头像
Bean8 个月前

No visible threat? Just words? lol.

Ryan Nichols Sr. 的头像
Ryan Nichols Sr.8 个月前

More men should stand up and carry. Protect yourself from the subway gremlins.

Jonk 的头像
Jonk8 个月前

Maybe if it wasn’t for all the insane violent black men trying to assert their dominance on the subway people wouldn’t feel like they have to protect themselves.

Call Me Garbage 🇺🇸 的头像
Call Me Garbage 🇺🇸8 个月前

Look at all of the senseless killings in murders from mentally deranged rabid people. Don’t blame this guy at all. It sure made the other guy think and walk away. He’s going home alive because he backed up and retreated. It’s the only smart thing that asshole did. He was a threat.

The American White Nigga 的头像
The American White Nigga8 个月前

Homeboy was speaking very aggressively up close to his face. I don’t blame him for pulling the gun, especially with what you see on the news he didn’t shoot anybody had bis finger off the trigger.

Michelle Yvonne 的头像
Michelle Yvonne8 个月前

We need to find out who this dude is and have him investigated. There’s a lot of fake cops running around the United States, including these fake ass ICE agents. These are proud boys in disguise.

OSINT Hobbyist 的头像
OSINT Hobbyist8 个月前

You're such a try-hard "progressive". Always performative.

Priest MO 的头像
Priest MO8 个月前

I love when I see all the white racism people who defend white bullshit in comments!!! if the color was flipped they still save the black person in the wrong

Len Ny 的头像
Len Ny8 个月前

Funny how everyone on that train seemed completely relaxed

Brooks 的头像
Brooks8 个月前

And you didn’t mention the thug harassing him ?

Hamncheze 的头像
Hamncheze8 个月前

10000% he's not a cop.

相关视频

MUST WATCH: Nate catches a crooked Muslim traffic cop red-handed, handing a ticket to a driver he clearly suspects is not one of his own. Then the cop lies through his teeth about the law, claiming Muslim taxi drivers can double-park wherever they want during Muslim prayers and that NYC traffic rules do not apply to them. That is complete garbage. He is making it up on the spot. The NYPD is compromised. Third-country invaders are wearing the badge and writing their own rules as they go. This is not policing. This is a man using the uniform to play favorites and punish natives. This Muslim cop is committing official misconduct. Under New York Penal Law § 195.00, a public servant commits official misconduct when he intentionally fails to perform a duty imposed by law with the intent to obtain a benefit or to favor someone. That is exactly what this is. It is also an administrative violation: an officer misusing the discretionary power of the badge for personal reasons and preferential treatment. Jessica S. Tisch NYPD Chief of Department He should be investigated, written up, and held to account. No special rules. No religious carve-outs. Same law for everybody.
1:14

MUST WATCH: Nate catches a crooked Muslim traffic cop red-handed, handing a ticket to a driver he clearly suspects is not one of his own. Then the cop lies through his teeth about the law, claiming Muslim taxi drivers can double-park wherever they want during Muslim prayers and that NYC traffic rules do not apply to them. That is complete garbage. He is making it up on the spot. The NYPD is compromised. Third-country invaders are wearing the badge and writing their own rules as they go. This is not policing. This is a man using the uniform to play favorites and punish natives. This Muslim cop is committing official misconduct. Under New York Penal Law § 195.00, a public servant commits official misconduct when he intentionally fails to perform a duty imposed by law with the intent to obtain a benefit or to favor someone. That is exactly what this is. It is also an administrative violation: an officer misusing the discretionary power of the badge for personal reasons and preferential treatment. Jessica S. Tisch NYPD Chief of Department He should be investigated, written up, and held to account. No special rules. No religious carve-outs. Same law for everybody.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

698,082 次观看 • 25 天前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents shot a man in the leg as he ran into his own home… while a pregnant woman and children were inside, in Minneapolis. In the video, the family is heard calling the police for help, saying ICE agents followed the man for about 30 minutes. When he reached his home, he ran inside. An agent then opened fired toward the house, hitting him in the leg. Let’s be clear about what that means. Law enforcement is not allowed to use lethal force just because someone runs. Law enforcement is not allowed to fire toward an occupied home. Law enforcement is not allowed to seize someone inside their home without a judicial warrant, absent extremely narrow circumstances. This shot was fired in the direction of a house with children inside. This was not a split-second traffic stop. This was not an imminent threat to anyone inside that home. If families are calling the police because federal agents are firing toward their house, the question isn’t whether this is normal. The question is how much longer the government will keep violating the Constitution before someone else is killed.
1:42

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents shot a man in the leg as he ran into his own home… while a pregnant woman and children were inside, in Minneapolis. In the video, the family is heard calling the police for help, saying ICE agents followed the man for about 30 minutes. When he reached his home, he ran inside. An agent then opened fired toward the house, hitting him in the leg. Let’s be clear about what that means. Law enforcement is not allowed to use lethal force just because someone runs. Law enforcement is not allowed to fire toward an occupied home. Law enforcement is not allowed to seize someone inside their home without a judicial warrant, absent extremely narrow circumstances. This shot was fired in the direction of a house with children inside. This was not a split-second traffic stop. This was not an imminent threat to anyone inside that home. If families are calling the police because federal agents are firing toward their house, the question isn’t whether this is normal. The question is how much longer the government will keep violating the Constitution before someone else is killed.

Jesus Freakin Congress

604,656 次观看 • 8 个月前

Joe Borelli: “Well, let's be clear. Benny Johnson's right. [Alex Pretti’s] a violent psychopath who was h*ll bent on attacking federal law enforcement. We just saw that on video. I mean, he clearly spit at the law enforcement officer. He clearly was doing some sort of jujitsu kicks against the vehicle, which, you know, resulted in the vehicle being smashed and broken.” “And I think I just want to point out as someone who does believe in the Second Amendment, and there was so much made about his firearm, responsible gun owners in the concealed carry community, in the gun community, no one who's a responsible gun owner provokes and escalates a fight. That is rule number one, if you are going to carry a firearm, is that you automatically lose every fight, you walk away, you don't escalate situations, unless not with law enforcement or with anyone else. He is someone who acted wildly irresponsible.” “The media narrative about this guy, that he was the second coming of the Lord and he was just this peaceful guy, that's disproven by that video, and Benny Johnson's right.”
1:55

Joe Borelli: “Well, let's be clear. Benny Johnson's right. [Alex Pretti’s] a violent psychopath who was h*ll bent on attacking federal law enforcement. We just saw that on video. I mean, he clearly spit at the law enforcement officer. He clearly was doing some sort of jujitsu kicks against the vehicle, which, you know, resulted in the vehicle being smashed and broken.” “And I think I just want to point out as someone who does believe in the Second Amendment, and there was so much made about his firearm, responsible gun owners in the concealed carry community, in the gun community, no one who's a responsible gun owner provokes and escalates a fight. That is rule number one, if you are going to carry a firearm, is that you automatically lose every fight, you walk away, you don't escalate situations, unless not with law enforcement or with anyone else. He is someone who acted wildly irresponsible.” “The media narrative about this guy, that he was the second coming of the Lord and he was just this peaceful guy, that's disproven by that video, and Benny Johnson's right.”

RedWave Press

116,949 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: ANOTHER CHILD INJURED BY NEW MTA SUBWAY GATES 🚨 A young girl was struck in the face by the new MTA subway gates at Broadway–Lafayette, suffering facial swelling and other injuries and was taken to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital. Let this sink in. This is NOT an isolated incident. This is what happens when “fare enforcement tech” is rushed out with no real-world safety testing. ⚠️ Gates that can hit children ⚠️ No clear warnings ⚠️ No safety buffer ⚠️ No accountability And here’s the part nobody wants to talk about: 👉 Injuries = Lawsuits 👉 Lawsuits = Settlements 👉 Settlements = TAXPAYERS PAYING FOR THE MTA’S BLUNDER Not the designers. Not the vendors. Not the executives. YOU. How many kids need to get hurt before these gates are pulled? How many settlements before someone admits this rollout was reckless? 🎥 Aftermath & details in the video. 👇🏾 Tell me — should these gates be shut down immediately? #nyc #mta #ny #fyp
1:30

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: ANOTHER CHILD INJURED BY NEW MTA SUBWAY GATES 🚨 A young girl was struck in the face by the new MTA subway gates at Broadway–Lafayette, suffering facial swelling and other injuries and was taken to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital. Let this sink in. This is NOT an isolated incident. This is what happens when “fare enforcement tech” is rushed out with no real-world safety testing. ⚠️ Gates that can hit children ⚠️ No clear warnings ⚠️ No safety buffer ⚠️ No accountability And here’s the part nobody wants to talk about: 👉 Injuries = Lawsuits 👉 Lawsuits = Settlements 👉 Settlements = TAXPAYERS PAYING FOR THE MTA’S BLUNDER Not the designers. Not the vendors. Not the executives. YOU. How many kids need to get hurt before these gates are pulled? How many settlements before someone admits this rollout was reckless? 🎥 Aftermath & details in the video. 👇🏾 Tell me — should these gates be shut down immediately? #nyc #mta #ny #fyp

Tramell Thompson

24,822 次观看 • 9 个月前

Joe Borelli: “Are you allowed to interfere with law enforcement?… If he would've stood on the sidewalk with a sign or with a camera, he would not be dead right now. But that's not what he did. He interfered with law enforcement.” Abby Phillip: “What was it about his conduct that you think was illegal or whatever it was?” Joe Borelli: “In close proximity, in contact with a law enforcement official.” Abby Phillip: “ But is he allowed to record what law enforcement is doing?” Joe Borelli: “Yes, from a safe distance. You're not allowed to actually be—“ Abby Phillip: “Okay. So, based on the video that you saw, was he at a safe distance?” Joe Borelli: “No... and he should have complied [with law enforcement].” Correct!
0:49

Joe Borelli: “Are you allowed to interfere with law enforcement?… If he would've stood on the sidewalk with a sign or with a camera, he would not be dead right now. But that's not what he did. He interfered with law enforcement.” Abby Phillip: “What was it about his conduct that you think was illegal or whatever it was?” Joe Borelli: “In close proximity, in contact with a law enforcement official.” Abby Phillip: “ But is he allowed to record what law enforcement is doing?” Joe Borelli: “Yes, from a safe distance. You're not allowed to actually be—“ Abby Phillip: “Okay. So, based on the video that you saw, was he at a safe distance?” Joe Borelli: “No... and he should have complied [with law enforcement].” Correct!

RedWave Press

108,560 次观看 • 8 个月前

HEATED NYC SUBWAY 💥 DISPUTE OVER AN '8-BALL JACKET' ESCALATES INTO A CHAOTIC BRAWL! 🤦 Tensions completely boiled over on a crowded New York City subway car when a verbal altercation took a shocking physical turn. A heated exchange concerning a vintage 1990 "8-ball jacket" and "Steve Madden" shoes escalated rapidly between passengers. The situation instantly intensified when a female commuter struck the towering man wearing the infamous jacket. In a split-second reaction, the man retaliated with a resounding slap, instantly sparking a massive, chaotic brawl among the surrounding riders. This viral public transit incident highlights the unpredictable nature of subway disputes. Who do you think was in the wrong here, and does self-defense apply in this specific situation? Let the debate begin in the comments! 👇
1:57

HEATED NYC SUBWAY 💥 DISPUTE OVER AN '8-BALL JACKET' ESCALATES INTO A CHAOTIC BRAWL! 🤦 Tensions completely boiled over on a crowded New York City subway car when a verbal altercation took a shocking physical turn. A heated exchange concerning a vintage 1990 "8-ball jacket" and "Steve Madden" shoes escalated rapidly between passengers. The situation instantly intensified when a female commuter struck the towering man wearing the infamous jacket. In a split-second reaction, the man retaliated with a resounding slap, instantly sparking a massive, chaotic brawl among the surrounding riders. This viral public transit incident highlights the unpredictable nature of subway disputes. Who do you think was in the wrong here, and does self-defense apply in this specific situation? Let the debate begin in the comments! 👇

Trump Girl 🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲

13,533 次观看 • 5 个月前

Mike Simmons who is currently a State Senator & is running for Congress is one of the biggest piece of shit the city has to offer & that’s saying a lot, He’s in an apartment building knocking on doors, a resident asked him to leave & when he didn’t she called the police. That is what you do when you don’t notice someone in your building. He tells this woman it’s against the law to call the police on an elected official. He later made a TikTok video saying that this is racism & that is a hate crime to call the police on a “person of color” if there’s no threat to public safety.
1:11

Mike Simmons who is currently a State Senator & is running for Congress is one of the biggest piece of shit the city has to offer & that’s saying a lot, He’s in an apartment building knocking on doors, a resident asked him to leave & when he didn’t she called the police. That is what you do when you don’t notice someone in your building. He tells this woman it’s against the law to call the police on an elected official. He later made a TikTok video saying that this is racism & that is a hate crime to call the police on a “person of color” if there’s no threat to public safety.

Libs Of Chicago

65,330 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent pulled a gun on an unarmed man, who was running AWAY from him… into an apartment complex… in Austin, Texas. This morning agents tried to stop two men, who then ran. In the video, an agent couldn’t catch one man, so he pulls his gun and points it at another unarmed man, while chasing him through a residential area. That is not normal. Pointing a firearm at someone is a use of force. And courts have been very clear… you don’t get to threaten lethal force just because someone ran from you. Running is not an imminent deadly threat. And this wasn’t an empty field. This was an apartment complex… where innocent people, including children, could have been in the line of fire because an agent decided to escalate a nonviolent situation. The agent then tells the man to get on the ground, which he does… and as the man is lying there unarmed, complying, the agent still has his gun pointed at him. Only after another agent says, “I got it, I got it,” does he finally holster his weapon. So, let’s be honest about what we’re watching… This is what poorly trained agents look like when they believe there are no consequences. This is what happens when escalation is normalized, and drawing a weapon becomes instinct instead of a last resort. An agent couldn’t catch someone… so he pulled a gun. A pattern we keep seeing. And every time it starts the same way, someone running away. Running away is not a capital offense. It does not justify threatening lethal force in a residential area, full of families. It does not justify pointing a firearm at an unarmed person, especially when on the ground. When agents feel empowered to escalate situations like this, it signals something bigger than one incident... It signals a culture that believes badges override constitutional rights. Threatening deadly force, when there is no immediate threat, is illegal. And it has to stop. Because the next time an agent “can’t catch” someone, we already know how the story can end.
1:48

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent pulled a gun on an unarmed man, who was running AWAY from him… into an apartment complex… in Austin, Texas. This morning agents tried to stop two men, who then ran. In the video, an agent couldn’t catch one man, so he pulls his gun and points it at another unarmed man, while chasing him through a residential area. That is not normal. Pointing a firearm at someone is a use of force. And courts have been very clear… you don’t get to threaten lethal force just because someone ran from you. Running is not an imminent deadly threat. And this wasn’t an empty field. This was an apartment complex… where innocent people, including children, could have been in the line of fire because an agent decided to escalate a nonviolent situation. The agent then tells the man to get on the ground, which he does… and as the man is lying there unarmed, complying, the agent still has his gun pointed at him. Only after another agent says, “I got it, I got it,” does he finally holster his weapon. So, let’s be honest about what we’re watching… This is what poorly trained agents look like when they believe there are no consequences. This is what happens when escalation is normalized, and drawing a weapon becomes instinct instead of a last resort. An agent couldn’t catch someone… so he pulled a gun. A pattern we keep seeing. And every time it starts the same way, someone running away. Running away is not a capital offense. It does not justify threatening lethal force in a residential area, full of families. It does not justify pointing a firearm at an unarmed person, especially when on the ground. When agents feel empowered to escalate situations like this, it signals something bigger than one incident... It signals a culture that believes badges override constitutional rights. Threatening deadly force, when there is no immediate threat, is illegal. And it has to stop. Because the next time an agent “can’t catch” someone, we already know how the story can end.

Jesus Freakin Congress

46,889 次观看 • 7 个月前

NYPD officers are ONLY trained on what they can’t do, not what they should do. The below “training video” was the NYPD’s attempt to “train” around NYC local law 10-181 aka the “diapraghm law” or the “chokehold law”. In this video officers are trained they cannot perform basic control techniques found in wrestling and jiu jitsu. Notice they are not trained on what to do because there is no way to train around this law. Since the inception of this law EVERY TIME a suspect resists arrest one way or the other NYPD officers violate 10-181. We are asking officers to go perform a very dangerous, high pressure job and hope they will not arbitrarily be selected for prosecution for doing the very job we ask them to do. I warned since its inception that is was not a matter of if a district attorney would use this law to prosecute a cop during a politically charged event but rather when. And now we a have a cop sitting in jail awaiting sentencing of up to 7 years in prison for attempting to arrest a violently resisting suspect who was uninjured during the encounter. FREE NYPD OFFICER OMAR HABIB
2:44

NYPD officers are ONLY trained on what they can’t do, not what they should do. The below “training video” was the NYPD’s attempt to “train” around NYC local law 10-181 aka the “diapraghm law” or the “chokehold law”. In this video officers are trained they cannot perform basic control techniques found in wrestling and jiu jitsu. Notice they are not trained on what to do because there is no way to train around this law. Since the inception of this law EVERY TIME a suspect resists arrest one way or the other NYPD officers violate 10-181. We are asking officers to go perform a very dangerous, high pressure job and hope they will not arbitrarily be selected for prosecution for doing the very job we ask them to do. I warned since its inception that is was not a matter of if a district attorney would use this law to prosecute a cop during a politically charged event but rather when. And now we a have a cop sitting in jail awaiting sentencing of up to 7 years in prison for attempting to arrest a violently resisting suspect who was uninjured during the encounter. FREE NYPD OFFICER OMAR HABIB

John D. Macari Jr. 🇺🇸🗽

10,894 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claremore, Oklahoma. U.S. Post Office sidewalk. January 2018. A man is recording and taking pictures in public on the north side of the post office. Claremore PD Officer Cassie Grettner detains him over complaints that someone was looking into vehicles. He asks her name and badge number. She refuses.“You give me your name, I’ll give you mine.” He tells her he’s not a public official. She is. She still won’t say her name or badge number. He asks again. She still won’t. He asks what crime she suspects him of committing. She cites a “disturbance.” He’s on a public sidewalk filming. That’s not a crime. Sgt. Book arrives. Same standoff. She still hasn’t identified herself to the man she’s detaining. No arrest. The encounter was filmed. Recording police in public is legal. A cop who detains someone and then refuses to identify herself is the part that doesn’t add up. ❓Why would Officer Cassie Grettner detain you and then refuse to tell you her name? ❓If a police officer won’t identify herself, is she even acting as a police officer?
9:51

Claremore, Oklahoma. U.S. Post Office sidewalk. January 2018. A man is recording and taking pictures in public on the north side of the post office. Claremore PD Officer Cassie Grettner detains him over complaints that someone was looking into vehicles. He asks her name and badge number. She refuses.“You give me your name, I’ll give you mine.” He tells her he’s not a public official. She is. She still won’t say her name or badge number. He asks again. She still won’t. He asks what crime she suspects him of committing. She cites a “disturbance.” He’s on a public sidewalk filming. That’s not a crime. Sgt. Book arrives. Same standoff. She still hasn’t identified herself to the man she’s detaining. No arrest. The encounter was filmed. Recording police in public is legal. A cop who detains someone and then refuses to identify herself is the part that doesn’t add up. ❓Why would Officer Cassie Grettner detain you and then refuse to tell you her name? ❓If a police officer won’t identify herself, is she even acting as a police officer?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

57,275 次观看 • 1 个月前

Bank Customer Shoots Robber At Chase… Then This Detail Changes Everything You’re at the bank on a Monday morning. Nine a.m. Withdrawal, deposit, whatever it is you do at the bank. Then boom — you’re in a gunfight. That’s what happened at a Chase Bank in Cedar Hill, where police say a customer shot a man who entered the bank armed with a knife and demanded money. Police reportedly got there in under two minutes. That is fast. But fast and fast enough are two different things. The man with the knife did not wait for police to arrive. The customer already inside the bank handled the threat in seconds. This case also raises a bigger question gun owners have argued about for years: open carry versus concealed carry. Would seeing a gun on someone’s hip have made this robber turn around? Or was the element of surprise more valuable because the armed customer was not obvious until the moment it mattered? Nobody has confirmed whether the customer was open carrying or concealed carrying, so I’m not pretending to know. But this case proves the bigger point. When seconds count, the person already in the room matters. And after the threat is stopped, another question starts immediately: How do police know you’re the good guy when they arrive and see you with a gun in your hand?
2:23

Bank Customer Shoots Robber At Chase… Then This Detail Changes Everything You’re at the bank on a Monday morning. Nine a.m. Withdrawal, deposit, whatever it is you do at the bank. Then boom — you’re in a gunfight. That’s what happened at a Chase Bank in Cedar Hill, where police say a customer shot a man who entered the bank armed with a knife and demanded money. Police reportedly got there in under two minutes. That is fast. But fast and fast enough are two different things. The man with the knife did not wait for police to arrive. The customer already inside the bank handled the threat in seconds. This case also raises a bigger question gun owners have argued about for years: open carry versus concealed carry. Would seeing a gun on someone’s hip have made this robber turn around? Or was the element of surprise more valuable because the armed customer was not obvious until the moment it mattered? Nobody has confirmed whether the customer was open carrying or concealed carrying, so I’m not pretending to know. But this case proves the bigger point. When seconds count, the person already in the room matters. And after the threat is stopped, another question starts immediately: How do police know you’re the good guy when they arrive and see you with a gun in your hand?

Colion Noir

20,885 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught, on video, recklessly pointing their GUNS at a CHILD, and multiple other unarmed U.S. citizens… who were nowhere near them… while demanding a legal resident prove his immigration status, in Immokalee, Florida. And this all happened in a busy gas station parking lot… In the video, a person is recording while walking toward the sidewalk… When suddenly, an ICE agent draws his firearm, turns around, and points his gun directly at the unarmed U.S. citizen. And just to be clear… No one was attacking him, rushing toward him, or even armed with any sort of weapon. In fact, no one was even close enough to pose an immediate physical threat. Then, the agent, with his gun still drawn, orders a car to move. As it backs up, he recklessly sweeps his loaded firearm across multiple unarmed people… including a MINOR… who are standing on a public sidewalk, legally record from a distance. The person filming keeps asking… “What’s the threat?” Because the video clearly doesn’t show one. Moments later, the same agent points his gun at the person filming, AGAIN. Then, a shirtless man walks around the vehicle to see what’s happening, and the agent immediately points the gun at him, too. At this point, a second ICE agent is seen, standing on the side of the car, with HIS gun drawn, too. And after all of that… The man, they were demanding papers from, walks away because he wasn’t undocumented. And the ICE agents get into their car and leave. Federal officers are trained to draw their firearms only when they reasonably believe there is an imminent threat of death, or serious bodily harm. Every time a loaded firearm is pointed at someone, there is a risk of a tragic mistake… especially in a public place where innocent bystanders could be caught in the middle. And once again… recording federal agents, from a public place, is protected by the First Amendment, so long as you are not interfering with their duties. And no one was interfering… or even near them. So, what exactly justified having multiple firearms drawn, and pointed at unarmed people, in a crowded gas station parking lot? This wasn’t just dangerous for the people filming… It was dangerous for everyone in that parking lot. And this video is just another example of what happens when poorly trained ICE agents aren’t held accountable.
2:42

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught, on video, recklessly pointing their GUNS at a CHILD, and multiple other unarmed U.S. citizens… who were nowhere near them… while demanding a legal resident prove his immigration status, in Immokalee, Florida. And this all happened in a busy gas station parking lot… In the video, a person is recording while walking toward the sidewalk… When suddenly, an ICE agent draws his firearm, turns around, and points his gun directly at the unarmed U.S. citizen. And just to be clear… No one was attacking him, rushing toward him, or even armed with any sort of weapon. In fact, no one was even close enough to pose an immediate physical threat. Then, the agent, with his gun still drawn, orders a car to move. As it backs up, he recklessly sweeps his loaded firearm across multiple unarmed people… including a MINOR… who are standing on a public sidewalk, legally record from a distance. The person filming keeps asking… “What’s the threat?” Because the video clearly doesn’t show one. Moments later, the same agent points his gun at the person filming, AGAIN. Then, a shirtless man walks around the vehicle to see what’s happening, and the agent immediately points the gun at him, too. At this point, a second ICE agent is seen, standing on the side of the car, with HIS gun drawn, too. And after all of that… The man, they were demanding papers from, walks away because he wasn’t undocumented. And the ICE agents get into their car and leave. Federal officers are trained to draw their firearms only when they reasonably believe there is an imminent threat of death, or serious bodily harm. Every time a loaded firearm is pointed at someone, there is a risk of a tragic mistake… especially in a public place where innocent bystanders could be caught in the middle. And once again… recording federal agents, from a public place, is protected by the First Amendment, so long as you are not interfering with their duties. And no one was interfering… or even near them. So, what exactly justified having multiple firearms drawn, and pointed at unarmed people, in a crowded gas station parking lot? This wasn’t just dangerous for the people filming… It was dangerous for everyone in that parking lot. And this video is just another example of what happens when poorly trained ICE agents aren’t held accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

245,391 次观看 • 2 个月前

As the Garda walks away this muslim man who lives on the North Circular Road (his full address is stated) he says "I will destroy you". I know he is a muslim because at one point he mentions Allah. By rights someone should report this video to the Gardaí because he is clearly seen making a threat (albeit in a cowardly manner when the Garda is just out of earshot). To be honest I'm not going out of my way to do that because they have done me no favours when I have dealt with them over serious matters. The Garda in this case was way too nice and patient. If it was a non muslim non migrant driver I'm not sure he if he would have been like that.
6:47

As the Garda walks away this muslim man who lives on the North Circular Road (his full address is stated) he says "I will destroy you". I know he is a muslim because at one point he mentions Allah. By rights someone should report this video to the Gardaí because he is clearly seen making a threat (albeit in a cowardly manner when the Garda is just out of earshot). To be honest I'm not going out of my way to do that because they have done me no favours when I have dealt with them over serious matters. The Garda in this case was way too nice and patient. If it was a non muslim non migrant driver I'm not sure he if he would have been like that.

Susanne Delaney

88,307 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Video of a crying mother who encountered an unhinged man waving a gun and threatening to shoot people on a NYC train is going viral. “When I tell y'all, I wanna get the fuck out of New York.” There was some guy, and he came on the train. At first, he just told somebody to move, and then some guy was like, “Excuse me.” Then he looked at the guy, put his hand in his bag, and started walking up and down the aisle with a gun, acting like he was gonna shoot people.” “He came by me and the baby.” “I didn’t know what to do, and I felt like I was so stuck.”
1:48

🚨BREAKING: Video of a crying mother who encountered an unhinged man waving a gun and threatening to shoot people on a NYC train is going viral. “When I tell y'all, I wanna get the fuck out of New York.” There was some guy, and he came on the train. At first, he just told somebody to move, and then some guy was like, “Excuse me.” Then he looked at the guy, put his hand in his bag, and started walking up and down the aisle with a gun, acting like he was gonna shoot people.” “He came by me and the baby.” “I didn’t know what to do, and I felt like I was so stuck.”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

58,117 次观看 • 5 个月前

Armed Driver Gets Shot By Carjacker, Then This Happened! A man in West Philly was carjacked and shot around seven in the morning. Then he returned fire. That matters because every time one of these stories comes up, somebody says the same thing: “Just give them what they want.” But based on how this carjacking unfolded, there was no clean window for compliance. The gun came out, the driver was already shot, and now the only thing between him and whatever came next was whether he had the ability to fight back. Compliance is not a contract. There is no rule that says if you hand over the keys, the person robbing you at gunpoint is obligated to let you live. A gun does not guarantee you go home. It does not make you bulletproof. There are absolutely moments where drawing is the wrong move. But this man was shot first, still armed, and still in the fight. That is the whole argument.
2:01

Armed Driver Gets Shot By Carjacker, Then This Happened! A man in West Philly was carjacked and shot around seven in the morning. Then he returned fire. That matters because every time one of these stories comes up, somebody says the same thing: “Just give them what they want.” But based on how this carjacking unfolded, there was no clean window for compliance. The gun came out, the driver was already shot, and now the only thing between him and whatever came next was whether he had the ability to fight back. Compliance is not a contract. There is no rule that says if you hand over the keys, the person robbing you at gunpoint is obligated to let you live. A gun does not guarantee you go home. It does not make you bulletproof. There are absolutely moments where drawing is the wrong move. But this man was shot first, still armed, and still in the fight. That is the whole argument.

Colion Noir

23,541 次观看 • 1 个月前

The firearm matters—and the media is hiding it. At the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was armed with a SIG Sauer P320 AXG Combat, a high-capacity 9mm pistol with a threaded barrel, extended 20–21 round magazine, and a SIG Romeo optic—a setup costing $1,500–$2,000. This was not a cheap carry gun. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat. Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.
5:08

The firearm matters—and the media is hiding it. At the Minneapolis Border Patrol shooting, the suspect was armed with a SIG Sauer P320 AXG Combat, a high-capacity 9mm pistol with a threaded barrel, extended 20–21 round magazine, and a SIG Romeo optic—a setup costing $1,500–$2,000. This was not a cheap carry gun. Officers were in a physical struggle with an armed suspect when a gun was perceived and the word “gun” was shouted. Under settled self-defense law, officers are entitled to rely on fellow officers’ reasonable perceptions. They do not have to personally confirm the threat. Once a firearm appears during active resistance, the legal standard is simple: reasonable perception of imminent deadly force. That standard was met here. Freeze-frame activism doesn’t override real-time dynamics, and the law does not require officers to wait to be shot. This was a tragic—but lawful—use of force.

Andrew Branca Show

4,309,404 次观看 • 8 个月前

Tell me this is a good zone….. My guy had no shot today. This is a good hitter. This is the guy who was ALL OVER the place today. This was a normal at bat for us. The two still pictures are two different pitches one strike one ball. This was every at bat and I never once showed this guy up until he engaged me… Then he got a lesson in etiquette. And no, not one time did I say do you know who I am. As far as he knows I’m just another dumb coach. Prospect Select Scout
0:53

Tell me this is a good zone….. My guy had no shot today. This is a good hitter. This is the guy who was ALL OVER the place today. This was a normal at bat for us. The two still pictures are two different pitches one strike one ball. This was every at bat and I never once showed this guy up until he engaged me… Then he got a lesson in etiquette. And no, not one time did I say do you know who I am. As far as he knows I’m just another dumb coach. Prospect Select Scout

Seth McClung

175,616 次观看 • 2 年前

Gavin Newsom on Trump: “He works for one man. That one man has added $4B to his personal fortune while sitting in what is supposed to be a public trust. He told you he was gonna drain the swamp. He didn’t drain the swamp, he gave it a presidential suite with gold leaf. This is a corruption story, this is a heist. This is one man trying to do to our American self government what no king or no foreign power has ever managed to do. And the question is whether we will let him”
0:52

Gavin Newsom on Trump: “He works for one man. That one man has added $4B to his personal fortune while sitting in what is supposed to be a public trust. He told you he was gonna drain the swamp. He didn’t drain the swamp, he gave it a presidential suite with gold leaf. This is a corruption story, this is a heist. This is one man trying to do to our American self government what no king or no foreign power has ever managed to do. And the question is whether we will let him”

Marco Foster

209,330 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bully cop throws his weight around on a some 14 year old kids. Little did he know he was getting recorded. What you are witnessing is Baltimore Police Officer Salvatore Rivieri completely losing his mind over a 14-year-old kid named Eric whose only "crime" was riding a skateboard at Baltimore’s Inner Harbor and using the words "man" and "dude". ​"I am not man, I am not dude... I am Officer Rivieri." ​The absolute fragility required to violently push a teenager to the ground and threaten to "smack" the attitude out of him over basic slang is staggering. The most alarming part isn’t just the screaming or the physical intimidation—it’s the absolute comfort and fluidity with which he executes this tyranny. ​This is not the behavior of a good officer having a bad day. This is the practiced behavior of a systemic bully who has spent years using his badge as a shield to terrorize people with absolute impunity. You can tell this isn't his first time conducting himself in this manner by a few key red flags: ​The Immediate Escalation: He doesn't attempt to de-escalate or issue a simple warning. He goes straight from zero to physical force and severe verbal threats because he expects absolute, whimpering submission. ​The "Father" Rhetoric: He immediately projects a bizarre, authoritarian parental dynamic, screaming that he will "smack it out of you" and threatening that the kid will "spend some time in juvenile [hall]". This type of psychological dominance is a learned tactic used to make minors feel entirely helpless. ​Complete Disregard for Witnesses: He does not care that other kids are watching or that a camera is rolling until the very end. He operates with the supreme confidence of a man who believes his department will always have his back, no matter how egregious his behavior. ​Fortunately, this time, the camera was rolling. When the footage was uploaded to social media it sparked massive public outrage. ​The Baltimore Police Department was forced to conduct an internal investigation. While he was initially suspended with pay, the wheels of justice finally turned in . A police trial board found Rivieri guilty of misconduct and clear neglect of duty, leading to his official termination from the force. ​Bad badges love to demand respect, but they consistently confuse respect with absolute compliance. When a cop views a 14-year-old with a skateboard as an existential threat to his ego, he shouldn't just be stripped of his badge—he should be held up as a textbook example of why citizens must continue to film every single interaction with law enforcement.
3:07

Bully cop throws his weight around on a some 14 year old kids. Little did he know he was getting recorded. What you are witnessing is Baltimore Police Officer Salvatore Rivieri completely losing his mind over a 14-year-old kid named Eric whose only "crime" was riding a skateboard at Baltimore’s Inner Harbor and using the words "man" and "dude". ​"I am not man, I am not dude... I am Officer Rivieri." ​The absolute fragility required to violently push a teenager to the ground and threaten to "smack" the attitude out of him over basic slang is staggering. The most alarming part isn’t just the screaming or the physical intimidation—it’s the absolute comfort and fluidity with which he executes this tyranny. ​This is not the behavior of a good officer having a bad day. This is the practiced behavior of a systemic bully who has spent years using his badge as a shield to terrorize people with absolute impunity. You can tell this isn't his first time conducting himself in this manner by a few key red flags: ​The Immediate Escalation: He doesn't attempt to de-escalate or issue a simple warning. He goes straight from zero to physical force and severe verbal threats because he expects absolute, whimpering submission. ​The "Father" Rhetoric: He immediately projects a bizarre, authoritarian parental dynamic, screaming that he will "smack it out of you" and threatening that the kid will "spend some time in juvenile [hall]". This type of psychological dominance is a learned tactic used to make minors feel entirely helpless. ​Complete Disregard for Witnesses: He does not care that other kids are watching or that a camera is rolling until the very end. He operates with the supreme confidence of a man who believes his department will always have his back, no matter how egregious his behavior. ​Fortunately, this time, the camera was rolling. When the footage was uploaded to social media it sparked massive public outrage. ​The Baltimore Police Department was forced to conduct an internal investigation. While he was initially suspended with pay, the wheels of justice finally turned in . A police trial board found Rivieri guilty of misconduct and clear neglect of duty, leading to his official termination from the force. ​Bad badges love to demand respect, but they consistently confuse respect with absolute compliance. When a cop views a 14-year-old with a skateboard as an existential threat to his ego, he shouldn't just be stripped of his badge—he should be held up as a textbook example of why citizens must continue to film every single interaction with law enforcement.

Giggling Gannon

42,249 次观看 • 3 个月前