Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A mathematician solved a problem that stood open for over 100 years, then explained it in an Italian lecture hall to a few dozen people. This is Hong Wang, professor at NYU's Courant Institute and at IHES in Paris, delivering the Colloquium Patavinum on Kakeya sets in 3 dimensions....

thelichhh's profile picture

the lich

4,781 subscribers

13,272 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Fields Medalist Wang Hong explains the century-old Kakeya problem: More than 100 years ago, Sōichi Kakeya asked: If an infinitely thin needle is rotated 180 degrees, how small can the area it sweeps out be? A. S. Besicovitch later showed that, with a carefully designed motion, the area can be made arbitrarily small. The question then evolved: What is the smallest possible dimension of a set containing a unit line segment in every direction? Mathematicians believe such a set must still have the largest possible dimension. The Kakeya conjecture is deeply connected to Fourier analysis, a field with important applications in medicine, engineering, communications and information science.
0:45

Fields Medalist Wang Hong explains the century-old Kakeya problem: More than 100 years ago, Sōichi Kakeya asked: If an infinitely thin needle is rotated 180 degrees, how small can the area it sweeps out be? A. S. Besicovitch later showed that, with a carefully designed motion, the area can be made arbitrarily small. The question then evolved: What is the smallest possible dimension of a set containing a unit line segment in every direction? Mathematicians believe such a set must still have the largest possible dimension. The Kakeya conjecture is deeply connected to Fourier analysis, a field with important applications in medicine, engineering, communications and information science.

China Perspective

25,106 views • 12 days ago

When Hong Wang won the Fields Medal, everyone talked about the honor: her age, her journey, the history she had made. But the most interesting question was barely discussed: What did she actually solve? It begins with a needle. Turn it until it has pointed in every possible direction. How little space can that movement occupy? Almost none, strangely. And yet, that tiny set may still carry the full complexity of three-dimensional space. This is the Kakeya conjecture. It sounds like a puzzle, but it resisted mathematicians for more than a century and sits at the heart of how mathematics understands waves and their concentration—the same world of ideas behind MRI reconstruction, image compression, sound and quantum physics. In 2025, Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl finally solved the three-dimensional case. This video starts with that simple needle and slowly reveals the mathematics behind the medal. We celebrated the person. This is a chance to understand the work.
22:43

When Hong Wang won the Fields Medal, everyone talked about the honor: her age, her journey, the history she had made. But the most interesting question was barely discussed: What did she actually solve? It begins with a needle. Turn it until it has pointed in every possible direction. How little space can that movement occupy? Almost none, strangely. And yet, that tiny set may still carry the full complexity of three-dimensional space. This is the Kakeya conjecture. It sounds like a puzzle, but it resisted mathematicians for more than a century and sits at the heart of how mathematics understands waves and their concentration—the same world of ideas behind MRI reconstruction, image compression, sound and quantum physics. In 2025, Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl finally solved the three-dimensional case. This video starts with that simple needle and slowly reveals the mathematics behind the medal. We celebrated the person. This is a chance to understand the work.

Michael Guo

84,960 views • 12 days ago

A mathematician who won the Fields Medal, the Abel Prize, and the Wolf Prize spends an hour on the equals sign. This is Pierre Deligne at the Institute for Advanced Study, September 2018, speaking at the memorial conference for Vladimir Voevodsky. The title is a question: what do we mean by equal. Deligne proved the last of the Weil conjectures. He holds every major honour mathematics gives. He chose to talk about the symbol every schoolchild learns first. The problem is real. Two objects can be the same in a way that carries information about how they are the same, and set theory throws that information away. Voevodsky spent his last years rebuilding foundations around exactly this. Watch the board. Set theory's definition of equality on one line, homotopy groups underneath, and the gap between them opening as he writes. A research engineer I know rewatched the setup twice and said type systems stopped feeling like an implementation detail. Free on YouTube from the Institute for Advanced Study, chalk only. Equality looked settled for 2,000 years. It was a placeholder.
46:49

A mathematician who won the Fields Medal, the Abel Prize, and the Wolf Prize spends an hour on the equals sign. This is Pierre Deligne at the Institute for Advanced Study, September 2018, speaking at the memorial conference for Vladimir Voevodsky. The title is a question: what do we mean by equal. Deligne proved the last of the Weil conjectures. He holds every major honour mathematics gives. He chose to talk about the symbol every schoolchild learns first. The problem is real. Two objects can be the same in a way that carries information about how they are the same, and set theory throws that information away. Voevodsky spent his last years rebuilding foundations around exactly this. Watch the board. Set theory's definition of equality on one line, homotopy groups underneath, and the gap between them opening as he writes. A research engineer I know rewatched the setup twice and said type systems stopped feeling like an implementation detail. Free on YouTube from the Institute for Advanced Study, chalk only. Equality looked settled for 2,000 years. It was a placeholder.

obssnnn

91,744 views • 7 days ago

JOE ROGAN: GOOGLE’S AI SOLVED AN IMPOSSIBLE EQUATION IN MINUTES Joe said Google’s AI achieved a staggering breakthrough by solving a problem that would take the world’s supercomputers billions of years. He said the calculation was so complex that even turning every atom in the universe into a computer wouldn’t have done it in time: “I believe it’s the Google one. They solved an equation that would take the world’s supercomputers, I think it was 2.6 billion years to solve, and it solved it in a matter of minutes. The only way for it to solve this problem, Marc Andreessen said it on my podcast, the equation is so difficult that if you took every atom in the universe and converted it to a supercomputer, the universe would die of heat death before it would solve this equation. And it solved it in minutes.” Source: Joe Rogan Jesse Michels
4:06

JOE ROGAN: GOOGLE’S AI SOLVED AN IMPOSSIBLE EQUATION IN MINUTES Joe said Google’s AI achieved a staggering breakthrough by solving a problem that would take the world’s supercomputers billions of years. He said the calculation was so complex that even turning every atom in the universe into a computer wouldn’t have done it in time: “I believe it’s the Google one. They solved an equation that would take the world’s supercomputers, I think it was 2.6 billion years to solve, and it solved it in a matter of minutes. The only way for it to solve this problem, Marc Andreessen said it on my podcast, the equation is so difficult that if you took every atom in the universe and converted it to a supercomputer, the universe would die of heat death before it would solve this equation. And it solved it in minutes.” Source: Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Mario Nawfal

861,540 views • 8 months ago

Richard Feynman stood at a Cornell blackboard in 1964 and explained the problem every AI lab is fighting in 2026. The BBC filmed it. Almost nobody watches it. The lecture is about why nature only answers in mathematics. Every team forcing language models to reason is hitting the wall he mapped 62 years ago. He was 46. The Nobel Prize came 11 months later. The footage survived on film reels and now sits free on YouTube with fewer views than a keyboard unboxing. Watch the blackboard section near the middle. He takes 1 of Kepler's laws and rebuilds it from nothing, with notation a 12-year-old can follow. No slides. No jargon. 1 piece of chalk. An ML engineer I know paused it 4 times and made his whole team watch it before standup. You're 62 years late. The lecture is still free.
9:15

Richard Feynman stood at a Cornell blackboard in 1964 and explained the problem every AI lab is fighting in 2026. The BBC filmed it. Almost nobody watches it. The lecture is about why nature only answers in mathematics. Every team forcing language models to reason is hitting the wall he mapped 62 years ago. He was 46. The Nobel Prize came 11 months later. The footage survived on film reels and now sits free on YouTube with fewer views than a keyboard unboxing. Watch the blackboard section near the middle. He takes 1 of Kepler's laws and rebuilds it from nothing, with notation a 12-year-old can follow. No slides. No jargon. 1 piece of chalk. An ML engineer I know paused it 4 times and made his whole team watch it before standup. You're 62 years late. The lecture is still free.

Merlow

2,565,924 views • 18 days ago

Richard Feynman took live questions from a random Auckland audience in 1979 and answered the ones physicists still argue about in 2026. The camera kept rolling. Almost nobody watches it. This is the final lecture of the series, the one where the script ends. A Nobel laureate standing at a microphone, fielding whatever the room throws at him about the deepest open problems in physics. He won the 1965 Nobel Prize for the theory behind every answer he gives here. This is him off-book, no prepared blackboard, thinking out loud in front of ordinary people. Watch how he handles the questions he can't answer. He says so, flat out, then explains exactly where knowledge stops and guessing begins. No hedging. No performance. A quant researcher I know rewatched it twice and sent 1 timestamp to his entire team with the message: this is how you say I don't know. 47 years on YouTube. Fewer views than a mousepad review. Admitting ignorance was his edge. It still works.
1:29:53

Richard Feynman took live questions from a random Auckland audience in 1979 and answered the ones physicists still argue about in 2026. The camera kept rolling. Almost nobody watches it. This is the final lecture of the series, the one where the script ends. A Nobel laureate standing at a microphone, fielding whatever the room throws at him about the deepest open problems in physics. He won the 1965 Nobel Prize for the theory behind every answer he gives here. This is him off-book, no prepared blackboard, thinking out loud in front of ordinary people. Watch how he handles the questions he can't answer. He says so, flat out, then explains exactly where knowledge stops and guessing begins. No hedging. No performance. A quant researcher I know rewatched it twice and sent 1 timestamp to his entire team with the message: this is how you say I don't know. 47 years on YouTube. Fewer views than a mousepad review. Admitting ignorance was his edge. It still works.

xanax

59,933 views • 13 days ago

The Millennium Prize Problems are seven well-known complex mathematical problems selected by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. The Clay Institute has pledged a US $1 million prize for the first correct solution to each problem. The Clay Mathematics Institute officially designated the title Millennium Problem for the seven unsolved mathematical problems, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, Hodge conjecture, Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness, P versus NP problem, Riemann hypothesis, Yang–Mills existence and mass gap, and the Poincaré conjecture at the Millennium Meeting held on May 24, 2000. Thus, on the official website of the Clay Mathematics Institute, these seven problems are officially called the Millennium Problems. To date, the only Millennium Prize problem to have been solved is the Poincaré conjecture. The Clay Institute awarded the monetary prize to Russian mathematician Grigori Perelman in 2010. However, he declined the award as it was not also offered to Richard S. Hamilton, upon whose work Perelman built.
0:21

The Millennium Prize Problems are seven well-known complex mathematical problems selected by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. The Clay Institute has pledged a US $1 million prize for the first correct solution to each problem. The Clay Mathematics Institute officially designated the title Millennium Problem for the seven unsolved mathematical problems, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, Hodge conjecture, Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness, P versus NP problem, Riemann hypothesis, Yang–Mills existence and mass gap, and the Poincaré conjecture at the Millennium Meeting held on May 24, 2000. Thus, on the official website of the Clay Mathematics Institute, these seven problems are officially called the Millennium Problems. To date, the only Millennium Prize problem to have been solved is the Poincaré conjecture. The Clay Institute awarded the monetary prize to Russian mathematician Grigori Perelman in 2010. However, he declined the award as it was not also offered to Richard S. Hamilton, upon whose work Perelman built.

internet archiva

199,061 views • 1 year ago

Andrew Wiles worked on Fermat's Last Theorem alone in his attic for 7 years and told nobody except his wife. The problem was 358 years old. Fermat scribbled in a margin in 1637 that he had a proof and no room to write it, and every mathematician since had failed. Wiles saw the statement in a library book at 10 years old. He never let it go. He was a Princeton professor when he started in 1986. He stopped publishing new work and released old results in pieces to hide the silence. He announced it in Cambridge in June 1993, over 3 lectures, revealing the target only at the end. Newspapers ran it worldwide. Then a referee found a gap. One step in the proof did not hold, and the error was fundamental. He spent 14 months trying to close it in public view, with the whole field watching. He was ready to quit. The fix arrived in September 1994. He has said he stared at it in disbelief for 20 minutes. The BBC filmed him describing that moment. He gets a few words out, then turns away from the camera in tears. He kept the greatest result of the century secret so nobody could take it.
51:20

Andrew Wiles worked on Fermat's Last Theorem alone in his attic for 7 years and told nobody except his wife. The problem was 358 years old. Fermat scribbled in a margin in 1637 that he had a proof and no room to write it, and every mathematician since had failed. Wiles saw the statement in a library book at 10 years old. He never let it go. He was a Princeton professor when he started in 1986. He stopped publishing new work and released old results in pieces to hide the silence. He announced it in Cambridge in June 1993, over 3 lectures, revealing the target only at the end. Newspapers ran it worldwide. Then a referee found a gap. One step in the proof did not hold, and the error was fundamental. He spent 14 months trying to close it in public view, with the whole field watching. He was ready to quit. The fix arrived in September 1994. He has said he stared at it in disbelief for 20 minutes. The BBC filmed him describing that moment. He gets a few words out, then turns away from the camera in tears. He kept the greatest result of the century secret so nobody could take it.

Gaspar

1,425,053 views • 10 days ago

On a question about the closure of the U.S. Consulate General in Peshawar on May 6, 2026, DG ISPR states that it was closed due to the safety and security of diplomatic personnel. This is an open acknowledgment of the deteriorating security situation in Peshawar.
2:28

On a question about the closure of the U.S. Consulate General in Peshawar on May 6, 2026, DG ISPR states that it was closed due to the safety and security of diplomatic personnel. This is an open acknowledgment of the deteriorating security situation in Peshawar.

OsintTV 📺

30,616 views • 3 months ago

French President Emmanuel Macron posted a video on social media on July 23, in which he called Chinese mathematician Wang Hong to congratulate her on winning the Fields Medal. Chinese mathematicians Deng Yu and Wang Hong were awarded the Fields Medals, marking the first time mathematicians of Chinese nationality have won the prestigious honor. Wang Hong is currently a professor at IHES in France.
0:28

French President Emmanuel Macron posted a video on social media on July 23, in which he called Chinese mathematician Wang Hong to congratulate her on winning the Fields Medal. Chinese mathematicians Deng Yu and Wang Hong were awarded the Fields Medals, marking the first time mathematicians of Chinese nationality have won the prestigious honor. Wang Hong is currently a professor at IHES in France.

Global Times

33,661 views • 13 days ago

A Fields Medalist walked into a UCLA hall and explained prime numbers to people with no mathematics background. Almost nobody watches it. Terence Tao won the Fields Medal, mathematics' highest honour, then a MacArthur Fellowship less than a month later. He was UCLA's first professor to take the Fields. The talk is structure and randomness in the primes. Numbers that look scattered at every scale, yet obey rules strict enough to build cryptography on. That tension is the same one running through every model trained in 2026. Randomness with structure underneath, and the whole question of where one stops and the other starts. Watch how he pitches it. General audience, no prerequisites, one of the strongest living mathematicians choosing clarity over display. A cryptography engineer I know rewatched the middle section twice and said the primes stopped looking arbitrary. Free on YouTube from UCLA, 17 years online. The hardest minds explain most simply. The pattern never changes.
47:32

A Fields Medalist walked into a UCLA hall and explained prime numbers to people with no mathematics background. Almost nobody watches it. Terence Tao won the Fields Medal, mathematics' highest honour, then a MacArthur Fellowship less than a month later. He was UCLA's first professor to take the Fields. The talk is structure and randomness in the primes. Numbers that look scattered at every scale, yet obey rules strict enough to build cryptography on. That tension is the same one running through every model trained in 2026. Randomness with structure underneath, and the whole question of where one stops and the other starts. Watch how he pitches it. General audience, no prerequisites, one of the strongest living mathematicians choosing clarity over display. A cryptography engineer I know rewatched the middle section twice and said the primes stopped looking arbitrary. Free on YouTube from UCLA, 17 years online. The hardest minds explain most simply. The pattern never changes.

the lich

49,895 views • 11 days ago

The most influential mathematician of his generation stands in a German lecture hall and explains a foundation he is rebuilding from scratch. Almost nobody watches it. This is Peter Scholze at Bielefeld University, November 2025, opening lecture of a new public series called Ars Mathematica. Scholze became a full professor at 24 and won the Fields Medal at 30. His work on perfectoid spaces reorganized entire areas of arithmetic geometry inside a decade. Condensed mathematics is his attempt to fix something deeper: the way analysis and algebra refuse to sit together properly. He is proposing new foundations for how mathematical objects carry topology. Watch how he pitches it to a general audience. No prerequisites assumed, no dilution, a working mathematician showing why abstraction opens rooms you could not otherwise enter. A researcher I know rewatched the middle section twice and said it was the first time condensed mathematics felt like an idea rather than a rumour. Free on YouTube from a university channel, subtitles on. Some people prove theorems. He is replacing the floor.
50:43

The most influential mathematician of his generation stands in a German lecture hall and explains a foundation he is rebuilding from scratch. Almost nobody watches it. This is Peter Scholze at Bielefeld University, November 2025, opening lecture of a new public series called Ars Mathematica. Scholze became a full professor at 24 and won the Fields Medal at 30. His work on perfectoid spaces reorganized entire areas of arithmetic geometry inside a decade. Condensed mathematics is his attempt to fix something deeper: the way analysis and algebra refuse to sit together properly. He is proposing new foundations for how mathematical objects carry topology. Watch how he pitches it to a general audience. No prerequisites assumed, no dilution, a working mathematician showing why abstraction opens rooms you could not otherwise enter. A researcher I know rewatched the middle section twice and said it was the first time condensed mathematics felt like an idea rather than a rumour. Free on YouTube from a university channel, subtitles on. Some people prove theorems. He is replacing the floor.

the lich

375,087 views • 8 days ago

One of the men who invented the transistor stood at a Bell Labs blackboard and explained how it works. AT&T kept the film. Almost nobody watches it. Walter Brattain shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics for the transistor. Every chip training every model in 2026 descends from what he built with Bardeen and Shockley in 1947. This is 28 minutes of the inventor teaching semiconductor physics himself. Properties, simple model, history, impact, new phenomena, written on the board in his own hand. Watch the section where he draws the crystal lattice and shows what an electron and a hole actually do inside it. The abstraction most engineers carry around, drawn from scratch by the man who found it. An embedded engineer I know watched it twice and said 28 minutes of chalk beat a semester of textbook diagrams. Free on YouTube from the AT&T archives, 10 chapters, black and white. Everyone uses his invention. Almost nobody hears him explain it.
28:33

One of the men who invented the transistor stood at a Bell Labs blackboard and explained how it works. AT&T kept the film. Almost nobody watches it. Walter Brattain shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics for the transistor. Every chip training every model in 2026 descends from what he built with Bardeen and Shockley in 1947. This is 28 minutes of the inventor teaching semiconductor physics himself. Properties, simple model, history, impact, new phenomena, written on the board in his own hand. Watch the section where he draws the crystal lattice and shows what an electron and a hole actually do inside it. The abstraction most engineers carry around, drawn from scratch by the man who found it. An embedded engineer I know watched it twice and said 28 minutes of chalk beat a semester of textbook diagrams. Free on YouTube from the AT&T archives, 10 chapters, black and white. Everyone uses his invention. Almost nobody hears him explain it.

xanax

103,808 views • 12 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."
4:51

#WATCH | Delhi: On media reports that the central government is likely to bring a bill to curb the powers of the Waqf Board over assets, Former Vice Chairman Of National Commission For Minorities Atif Rasheed says, "The Waqf Act was formed in 1954. The then government in 1995 changed it completely. In 2013, a lot of amendments were made to the act. So, now if an amendment is taking place, it does not need to be taken negatively. We should trust the government, it is dedicated to 'Sabka Sath, Sabka Vikas'... As per the reports, it seems that there are going to be around 32 amendments in the act. If it is about registration with the Collector or a judicial inquiry, then why should one have a problem with it? In 2013, it was amended that the government should map it every 10 years... This is not an interference in the Shariat and it does not decrease the power of the Waqf..."

ANI

14,687 views • 2 years ago

This is one of my favorite player development stories of all time…. Sophie is one of the best players to come out of the Albany area, especially in the last handful of years. She was an unbelievable shooter in HS, signed to play for URI in the A-10. Before her Freshman year she developed a ‘wiggle’ in her elbow on her shot. It was tough for her to reach from the HS 3 pt line. I remember being nervous that if she couldn’t fix it, it would be hard for her to get on the court. She didn’t play much that whole year and during winter break, when she got home, we locked in and figured out a series of drills that would help her limit the wiggle and generate power on her shot. In this video are a couple of the drills, you can see how the elbow stabilized in just a couple days. The best part is that she was able to then go back to school, continue what we worked on, and improve it by shortening the dip and transfer that success to games. She went on to shoot over 40% from three that year, and broke the career 3 point record at URI. I’m really proud of how she took ownership of her development and achieved success!!
1:10

This is one of my favorite player development stories of all time…. Sophie is one of the best players to come out of the Albany area, especially in the last handful of years. She was an unbelievable shooter in HS, signed to play for URI in the A-10. Before her Freshman year she developed a ‘wiggle’ in her elbow on her shot. It was tough for her to reach from the HS 3 pt line. I remember being nervous that if she couldn’t fix it, it would be hard for her to get on the court. She didn’t play much that whole year and during winter break, when she got home, we locked in and figured out a series of drills that would help her limit the wiggle and generate power on her shot. In this video are a couple of the drills, you can see how the elbow stabilized in just a couple days. The best part is that she was able to then go back to school, continue what we worked on, and improve it by shortening the dip and transfer that success to games. She went on to shoot over 40% from three that year, and broke the career 3 point record at URI. I’m really proud of how she took ownership of her development and achieved success!!

Steve Dagostino

13,612 views • 11 months ago

David Simon on the barriers "The Wire" (2002-2008) faced: "Interviewer: Do you think the fact you're telling stories in different ways than is traditional, and it has this darkness to it, was that the big barrier to the show becoming more popular than it was? Would you say it was the racial makeup of the cast? Simon: There were a lot of barriers. The racial makeup of the cast was problematic and we knew that going in. The complexity of the serial itself -- the fact that you couldn't miss a couple of episodes and feel comfortable watching it. Though I think that HBO was a wonderful vehicle for that with the multiple viewings, the DVDs and ultimately with On Demand. It was less of a problem as the show went on. It was also less of a problem as people who watched the show got used to its rhythms. The first season was on some level training the audience to watch television a little bit differently, and reducing the expectations in terms of pacing, in terms of cliffhangers, in terms of the requirement to absorb detail or even to look for symbolism. Those were problems. The other problem is, no easy gratifications, other than some real effort at careful characterization and humor. That was it. Without the humor, it would have been unbearable. Without an acknowledgement of the humanity of the characters, despite all their flaws, their vanities, their absurdities -- if on some level, you can't make people care about the characters, you've got a problem no matter what you're doing. We had some obligations to people if they wanted to watch, but a happy ending was not among the list of obligations." (David Simon's interview with Alan Sepinwall, 2008) P.S: On this day, 24 years ago, the first episode of "The Wire" was aired worldwide.
2:34

David Simon on the barriers "The Wire" (2002-2008) faced: "Interviewer: Do you think the fact you're telling stories in different ways than is traditional, and it has this darkness to it, was that the big barrier to the show becoming more popular than it was? Would you say it was the racial makeup of the cast? Simon: There were a lot of barriers. The racial makeup of the cast was problematic and we knew that going in. The complexity of the serial itself -- the fact that you couldn't miss a couple of episodes and feel comfortable watching it. Though I think that HBO was a wonderful vehicle for that with the multiple viewings, the DVDs and ultimately with On Demand. It was less of a problem as the show went on. It was also less of a problem as people who watched the show got used to its rhythms. The first season was on some level training the audience to watch television a little bit differently, and reducing the expectations in terms of pacing, in terms of cliffhangers, in terms of the requirement to absorb detail or even to look for symbolism. Those were problems. The other problem is, no easy gratifications, other than some real effort at careful characterization and humor. That was it. Without the humor, it would have been unbearable. Without an acknowledgement of the humanity of the characters, despite all their flaws, their vanities, their absurdities -- if on some level, you can't make people care about the characters, you've got a problem no matter what you're doing. We had some obligations to people if they wanted to watch, but a happy ending was not among the list of obligations." (David Simon's interview with Alan Sepinwall, 2008) P.S: On this day, 24 years ago, the first episode of "The Wire" was aired worldwide.

DepressedBergman

33,114 views • 2 months ago

A student named Chitra at #DelhiUniversity was allegedly harassed by a professor over a certain issue. She created a reel about the incident and posted it on Instagram. When the head of the department found out about the reel, they pressured her to delete it. However, Chitra stood her ground and refused to take it down. The DU administration must ensure justice for the student and take appropriate action against the professor involved in the harassment.
1:31

A student named Chitra at #DelhiUniversity was allegedly harassed by a professor over a certain issue. She created a reel about the incident and posted it on Instagram. When the head of the department found out about the reel, they pressured her to delete it. However, Chitra stood her ground and refused to take it down. The DU administration must ensure justice for the student and take appropriate action against the professor involved in the harassment.

Hate Detector 🔍

571,109 views • 7 months ago

Paul Dirac stood in a Christchurch lecture hall in 1975 and asked whether gravity itself is slowly weakening. On camera. Almost nobody has heard him do it. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize with Schrödinger. His equation predicted antimatter before any lab found it. Physicists put him next to Newton and rarely next to anyone else. This is the 4th and final lecture of the only clean filmed series he left. He was 73. Instead of playing the safe legend, he spends the hour defending his wildest idea: the Large Numbers Hypothesis, the claim that nature's constants may drift over billions of years. Watch how he builds it. He lines up giant numbers from cosmology, notices they rhyme, and follows the pattern wherever it leads, knowing most colleagues think he's wrong. A researcher I know rewatched it twice and kept 1 note: the founder of quantum mechanics risking his reputation at 73, in public, on a hunch. The footage sits free on YouTube with cleaned audio. Most people protect their legacy. Dirac spent his on 1 more question.
1:10:05

Paul Dirac stood in a Christchurch lecture hall in 1975 and asked whether gravity itself is slowly weakening. On camera. Almost nobody has heard him do it. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize with Schrödinger. His equation predicted antimatter before any lab found it. Physicists put him next to Newton and rarely next to anyone else. This is the 4th and final lecture of the only clean filmed series he left. He was 73. Instead of playing the safe legend, he spends the hour defending his wildest idea: the Large Numbers Hypothesis, the claim that nature's constants may drift over billions of years. Watch how he builds it. He lines up giant numbers from cosmology, notices they rhyme, and follows the pattern wherever it leads, knowing most colleagues think he's wrong. A researcher I know rewatched it twice and kept 1 note: the founder of quantum mechanics risking his reputation at 73, in public, on a hunch. The footage sits free on YouTube with cleaned audio. Most people protect their legacy. Dirac spent his on 1 more question.

xanax

19,742 views • 13 days ago

In 1962, a helicopter flying over the vast forests of Guatemala and Honduras saw a series of temples in the middle of these forests. After that, research was done on it and it was found out that it is an ancient Hindu temple and the description of snake god or Hades in Hindu culture is the same. At a short distance from here in Honduras, a huge cave and many statues of Hanuman Ji and evidence of an entire city have been found and many Hindu temples have been found. Watch National Geographic report
1:56

In 1962, a helicopter flying over the vast forests of Guatemala and Honduras saw a series of temples in the middle of these forests. After that, research was done on it and it was found out that it is an ancient Hindu temple and the description of snake god or Hades in Hindu culture is the same. At a short distance from here in Honduras, a huge cave and many statues of Hanuman Ji and evidence of an entire city have been found and many Hindu temples have been found. Watch National Geographic report

Baba Banaras™

240,926 views • 1 year ago

His lighthouse stood for 123 years. And in the end it was not the tower that failed. It was the rock underneath it. 🇬🇧 Two lighthouses stood on the Eddystone Rocks before him, 14 miles south of Plymouth, and the sea destroyed them both. The first, built of wood, vanished without trace in the Great Storm of 1703, taking its builder and 5 other men with it. The second stood for 47 years, then burned one December night in 1755, down to the rock it stood on. 🔥 So Britain faced a question: how do you build on a rock the sea owns? The Royal Society's answer was not a lighthouse man. It was John Smeaton, an Englishman from Austhorpe near Leeds, a maker of scientific instruments who had turned his mind to engineering. He started with a question nobody had thought to ask. Why does an oak tree survive a storm? Wide at the root, narrow at the top. So he shaped his tower like the trunk of an oak. Wood had washed away and wood had burned, so he built in granite, every block dovetailed into its neighbours like a carpenter's joint in stone, pinned with dowels of marble. For the mortar he ran experiment after experiment until he proved which limestone sets hard even underwater, a lime the Romans had used whose science had been lost. He worked out why and brought it back. 3 years, 1756 to 1759, 14 miles out in the open sea. Then the lamp was lit, and the sea came to test it, winter after winter. It did not move. He went on to build bridges, harbours, canals and mills across Britain, and because the only engineers Britain named were soldiers, he called himself a civil engineer, the first man in Britain to do it. In 1771 he and 6 others met in a London tavern and founded the first engineering society anywhere in the world. It still exists. 🏛️ His light burned for 123 years. When engineers finally found a fault in 1877, it was in the reef, not the tower. The sea was wearing away the rock beneath it. His tower had outlasted the rock it stood on. In 1882 the lamp went out for the last time. But nobody scrapped his tower. The top came down stone by stone and went back up on Plymouth Hoe, where it stands today in its red and white bands. You can climb it. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Look at any lighthouse standing on a British rock. That curve is his oak, still holding. We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it. 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
3:30

His lighthouse stood for 123 years. And in the end it was not the tower that failed. It was the rock underneath it. 🇬🇧 Two lighthouses stood on the Eddystone Rocks before him, 14 miles south of Plymouth, and the sea destroyed them both. The first, built of wood, vanished without trace in the Great Storm of 1703, taking its builder and 5 other men with it. The second stood for 47 years, then burned one December night in 1755, down to the rock it stood on. 🔥 So Britain faced a question: how do you build on a rock the sea owns? The Royal Society's answer was not a lighthouse man. It was John Smeaton, an Englishman from Austhorpe near Leeds, a maker of scientific instruments who had turned his mind to engineering. He started with a question nobody had thought to ask. Why does an oak tree survive a storm? Wide at the root, narrow at the top. So he shaped his tower like the trunk of an oak. Wood had washed away and wood had burned, so he built in granite, every block dovetailed into its neighbours like a carpenter's joint in stone, pinned with dowels of marble. For the mortar he ran experiment after experiment until he proved which limestone sets hard even underwater, a lime the Romans had used whose science had been lost. He worked out why and brought it back. 3 years, 1756 to 1759, 14 miles out in the open sea. Then the lamp was lit, and the sea came to test it, winter after winter. It did not move. He went on to build bridges, harbours, canals and mills across Britain, and because the only engineers Britain named were soldiers, he called himself a civil engineer, the first man in Britain to do it. In 1771 he and 6 others met in a London tavern and founded the first engineering society anywhere in the world. It still exists. 🏛️ His light burned for 123 years. When engineers finally found a fault in 1877, it was in the reef, not the tower. The sea was wearing away the rock beneath it. His tower had outlasted the rock it stood on. In 1882 the lamp went out for the last time. But nobody scrapped his tower. The top came down stone by stone and went back up on Plymouth Hoe, where it stands today in its red and white bands. You can climb it. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Look at any lighthouse standing on a British rock. That curve is his oak, still holding. We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it. 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

37,085 views • 23 days ago