Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇹🇭🇩🇰🇸🇪 A moment when #Thailand’s Queen Suthida assisted provide blankets to #Denmark’s King Frederik X and then to her own husband King Vajiralongkorn at #Sweden’s King Carl XVI Gustaf’s birthday celebration at the Royal Palace #Stockholm. อีกหนึ่งพระราชโมเมนต์ความประทับใจของ #พระราชินี ที่ทรงช่วยถวายผ้าห่มแด่กษัตริย์เฟรเดอริกที่ 10 แห่งเดนมาร์ก และ #ในหลวง ในระหว่างการทอดพระเนตรการสวนสนามวันเฉลิมพระชนมพรรษา กษัตริย์คาร์ลที่ 16 กุสตาฟแห่งสวีเดน ณ พระราชวังหลวง...

37,128 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Crown Princess Mette-marit is lucky she is not part of the British Royal family, therefore this empty and farcical interview can fly under the radar instead of drawing worldwide backlash for 7 years straight like the Andrew interview did, just because he is a member of the British Royal family😵‍💫 Since the Epstein revelations about her and the rape trial of her son, Marius Borg, the Royal family of Norway has been facing intense scrutiny. Thus, in an unusual move, Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere has urged Mette-marit to come forward and explain the many emails she and Epstein sent to each other between 2011 and 2014; that is AFTER his conviction as a known Child sex offender and more than a decade AFTER her marriage to Crown Prince Haakon🔥 This interview is the third attempt by Mette-marit and the Norwegian Monarchy to make things blow over, and goodness me, some people are simply not meant to be put in front of the camera... First of all, she is a pale blond with a stern face naturally. Why is she is dressed in full black for an interview that is suppose to endear her to the public? It is giving the "mad villain of the story"... Second, If you simply turn off the volume and look at her face and body language while she talks, you are not left with a positive impression of her at all. You do not register "remorse" nor "accountability", you register nonchalance, complacency and even a bit of annoyance at having to answer these questions. When you put the volume on and actually listen to her non-answers and how she is attempting to play the "naive" victim of Epstein in all this, you realise that you are in front of a manipulator🔥 The issue that Mette-marit has is a credibility issue. In Norway, there are serious question about her fit to be Queen and a poll published on Tuesday by TV2, showed that 47.6 percent of respondents said she should not become queen, while only 28.9 percent backed her. This interview did nothing good for her, especially when she is plain lying about not knowing about Epstein past and never looking him up. In one of the email exposed last February, we learnt that in 2011, three years after his first conviction, Mette-Marit wrote to Epstein that she had "googled him", adding "it didn't look too good" and ending the sentence with a smiling emoji. So she knew. In 2012, when Epstein told her he was in Paris "on a wife hunt", she replied that the French capital is "good for adultery" and "Scandis (are) better wife material". Then in 2013, she stayed at his Florida home for four days.🤡 Thus, this idea of saying she was "manipulated" is false. What she is attempting to do is to manipulate the public perception to come out as the victim when she is anything but. The third issue with this interview is why is Crown Prince Haakon sitting there like a bodyguard? Is the Norwegian palace PR run by a group of squirrels? WHY is the Future King involved in this mess, instead of insulating him from this scandal in the Psyche of the public opinion?🤡 Their palace PR is absolutely useless. Only Mette- marit should have sat there. How do you look as a husband and future king while the journalist ask your wife about her flirting messages with a convicted paedo over a period of 4 years? Ridiculous😵‍💫 The more you hear and see of Mette, the more it becomes clear that this woman is a manipulator. The more you hear and see of Haakon, the more you realise that he is being lead around by Mette-marit, who does not have an ounce of sound judgement. So truly, what we have here for the future of the Norwegian Monarchy is a blind person leading a deaf person. So they are heading for a cliff in a "super sketchy" manner..☕️ 📹Paula Matanovich

Canellecitadelle

115,221 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

James Busby's Letter to Maori Elders in 1860 On June 22, 1860, James Busby wrote a letter to Maori Elders explaining his concerns to recent Maori uprisings, wanting to break the Treaty and make their own sovereignty - such as the Kingi movement. Busby was one of the authors of the Treaty, and 20 years after its signing, this letter shows the true intention of the Treaty and it's influence on early New Zealand. The Treaty wasn't about co-governance; it was about working together as one people. Below is my summarised version of the letter making it easier for modern audiences to understand. Old Men and fathers of the Maori nation, listen to the words of an old man and a father, whose children and grandchildren are natives of the same land as your children and grandchildren... When King William sent me to this country, be did not send me to govern either my own countrymen; or the Maoris, but to live with them and give them good advice. There was no law. I bad no power to [prosecute]. I could only write to the King who, from time to time, sent a ship-of-war to inquire whether the King's people and the Maori people were living and trading together in peace and friendship. By-and-bye, the King's people increased in this land, where there was no law and no governor. The people required to be governed by law. King William died and [was replaced by Queen Victoria]... [who was] a friend to the Maori people. She sent Captain Hobson to tell them that if they would become one people with her own children she would become a mother to them, and would extend to them the protection of her law. When Captain Hobson arrived... [chiefs] came in great numbers and considered the matter. Their old missionaries, who had given them the word of God, advised them to listen to the words of the Queen. They were good words, and would keep alive the Maori race. For two days they assembled, and discussed the [Treaty]. Captain Hobson said, take a week to consider. The chiefs would not wait till the end of the week, but said to Captain Hobson, Come from your ship... and finish the matter. Then was signed the Treaty of Waitangi, the covenant between the Queen and her Maori people, by which the Natives of New Zealand became subjects of the Queen, and the Queen became the protector of the Maori race. The Queen promised to protect each man — and every man; so that every man's land should be his own. And the Maoris agreed that when they wished to sell the land, they should sell it only to the Queen, because when Queen Victoria became Queen of New Zealand, it was not lawful for any of her people to buy land, but only for those whom she appointed. The treaty was carried over the Islands, and all the principal chiefs entered inio the covenant. But someone will perhaps say to me, I did not sign the treaty; I am not bound by it. Friend, tell me this: - Can one stone stop the flow of a river? - Can one man stand against a thousand? - If he does not turn and go with the rest of the army, will he not be trodden under foot by it? Tell me now, has this river, which began to flow in your land when Victoria became Queen, - Brought you evils or has it brought you blessings? - Has it overflowed its banks and swept any of you from your homes? Or has it not, rather, covered its banks; with all kind of riches? - Where were your cattle? - Where were your horses and and ploughs? - Where were your mills and the wheat to grind in them? - Where were your fruit trees, your apples and peaches, your vines and figs? - Where were your warm blankets, and all manner of clothes? - Your jaws ached with eating the fern root - Your women's backs were broken under their burdens - Your children perished for want of milk - You shivered in the cold. .... Listen, Friends! "The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof. When God created man upon the earth, he said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it." The people of England have not been disobedient to this command. Their own island is full of inhabitants. Have the Maori race fulfilled the command of God? Have they replenished New Zealand? Have they not rather, destroyed and devoured each other, until they became few and small in numbers? The Ngapuhi invaded Waikato, Waikato rose upon Taranaki, Taranaki destroyed the South. Who can court the numbers whose blood watered the earth! It was not the Pakeha who rose against them. It was Maori who rose upon Maori; every man's hand was against his brother. When man's wickedness is great upon the earth, God suffers them to destroy each other until there are none left. But He will not allow His earth to remain for ever in waste. He "formed it to be inhabited." He calls another nation to fill its waste places, and to make its deserts blossom and bring forth fruit. Take heed, friends, that you are not rebelling against God as well as against the Queen. Be not forgetful of what you were before the Queen cast her mantle over you. Then you were naked and destitute of all things; now you are rich and increased in goods. Dwell in peace and oppose not the law of the Queen. The Maori nation is incorporated into the body of which the Queen is the head. The power of the Maori people is like that of the little finder of the left hand. If an ulcer breaks out°in the point of the little finger it gives disturbance to the whole body. If the surgeon cannot heal the ulcer he will say, Cut off the first joint of the little finger, lest the corruption spread over the whole finger. If the whole finger is diseased, he will say, Cut off the whole finger; it is not fit that the whole body should suffer for so small a member Two ulcers have broken out - one at Taranaki - one at Waikato. Teira has sold his land to the Queen. Wiremu Kingi says "the land shall not go to the Queen. The land is Teira's; let Teira keep his land; I will not suffer it to be sold; because, though the land is Teira's, the power is mine. I am Waitara; let Teira live under my shadow/[sovereignty]." Friends, this is a great mistake of Wiremu Kingi's. In former times, before the Queen's shadow/[sovereignty] covered the land, when a strong man armed kept his place, his goods were in peace; but when a stronger [man] came, he was overcome, and his goods taken from him. This was Maori custom. In those days Wiremu Kingi, being stronger, could overcome Teira. But when the Queen promised to every Maori that he should be as one of her own people, the law came - the law is the strength of the weak man — and tbe law says every man's land is his own to sell to the Queen or to keep; no one shall lake it from him because be is weak; no one shall prevent him selling it if he wishes to sell it. If the Governor allowed Wiremu Kingi to overcome Teira, he would make the Queen false to the promise she made to every Maori man when she entered into the treaty. Friends, one word more. It is a new thing on the earth for a strong nation [like Britain] to come upon a weak one [the Maori], and say to it, You are weak and we are strong; nevertheless we will not take your land, but buy it from you when you wish to sell it... [The Queen] has secured you in possession of your lands, but she has done more than that; to some of you she has lent money to build mills, that you might eat bread instead of fern-root; to some she has lent money to buy vessels to carry their wheat to market. She did not do this because you were weak and ignorant. She has cherished you as a nurse cherishes her children. Now, I who write these things to you, do not belong to the Governor nor to the Queen. I am a private man, dwelling on my own land, as each of you dwells on his own land... I am as one of you. The Governor does not know that I am writing this letter to you. Perhaps he will see it in the newspaper, perhaps not. I write it because these are troubled times, and I foresee that evil will come upon you if you do not turn from your folly. I have read all your speeches at Waikato. The flagstaff is a challenge to the Queen. Think, if the King of France had set up [sovereignty, would he have let these revolts persist?] No! 500 ships-of-war would have been upon the seas and numerous soldiers upon [You. The Queen has not dealt with You because You are new to the knowledge nationhood and have much to learn]. But friends, these ulcers must be healed. Therefore I remind you, as an old friend, to cast away your folly, and let the land be in peace. From your old Friend, From Te Puhipi [James Busby] Listen to more podcasts like this at: Source Title: Correspondence Publisher: The Maori Messenger: Te Karere Maori Author: James Busby Date: June 30th, 1860 Copyright: None

NZ Media Watch

37,780 просмотров • 1 год назад

Everytime you see the "Where is Kate Middleton?" and the conspiracies, smile my dears, because there is a greater implication here. After 5 months of public Bullying, Press pressures, Public Pressures and Palace pressures, NO ONE can tell you anything tangible about the princess; not the press, not the courtiers, no one. Prince William has indeed remained Catherine's Relentless protector and defender🔥 He has kept his promise to Catherine that •she would have surgery in complete privacy; •be in and out of the hospital in complete privacy; • Be back home to recover in complete privacy; • That he would take care of their children and handle everything while she focus on her recovery on complete privacy🤩 We are 5 months into 2024, and Catherine, as the Most High Profile future Queen in the World, has enjoyed a privacy that was not given to any other royal women or wife of an Heir apparent EVER in History. This is not thanks to the press; this is not even thanks to the Palace. It is because her Husband has refused to serve her on a platter and has not let himself be cowered by outside nor inside pressures on him to relent. As his mentor and Frmr Private secretary Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton already said of Him: "William was always someone of deeply impressive maturity[...] There are many examples of when I worked for William where it would have been very easy to take one route, but it wouldn’t have been the honorable or the right thing to do; so he took the more difficult route."❤️ Prince William proved his private secretary right indeed. He chose the most difficult path when it came to protecting Catherine because it was the right thing to do. The Easiest path would have been to give the press what they want: access to Catherine to take her pictures so they can make money of her and dissect her ad nauseam while she recovers. Instead, he chose to do the one thing that would anger them and bring their wrath on him: He gave them No access and No explanations🔥 William EVEN dared to take a mother's day picture of his OWN wife and children HIMSELF; How dare he..😏🤡 The Fact is, Catherine has Privacy ONLY because Prince William held strong for his family to remain at peace during this time of turmoil. In 2012 during their Pacific Royal tour, Catherine was once again victim of the Press attacks and violation of her privacy when the french magazine, The Closer, published topless pictures of her while on vacation with William. The DM editor, Rebecca English, quizzed him about the situation and it was then that Prince William revealed that Prior to marrying her, he had given his word to her parents that he would protect her at all costs and take care of her; a promise he continues to stand by❤️ Just this month, a friend of the RF revealed pretty much nothing to People Mag when he said that "Prince William is keeping his inner circle tight during a challenging chapter." The Source added: "He is not leaning on too many others"😏 Another source closer to the Wales said: "The Prince of Wales is relying heavily on the "nuclear family unit" of his immediate family of five and Kate’s supportive family: her parents Carole and Michael Middleton and her siblings Pippa and James"🔥 Who could blame him? He has to keep quiet since he knows everyone wants to know what he knows. So he is right to rely on the people who will never betray him nor Catherine: The Middletons. A daft post was asking "why are the Middletons not asking where their daughter is?" Why would they, Dimmy?🤡 They know exactly where she is and probably what she ate today. The Middletons have do not talk because they KNOW what is going on and are protecting their OWN Daughter, alongside William😏 So when you see people asking where she is, remember that the Future King kept his promise to his Wife; and a Man who will keep his promises to his wife and children, will keep his promises to his country and to the Monarchy☕️ 📹Tokkianami

Canellecitadelle

371,585 просмотров • 2 лет назад

When Andrew made a big show of approaching Prince William during the Funeral of the Duchess of Kent, waiting the exact moment when the cameras will snap him with the Heir, I bet he did not foresee this would be his last public appearance alongside William and that not only will he lose his home but he would lose all his styles and Titles as well😏 But simply looking at William’s expression, you could tell he was thinking ahead👌🏽 BP is in full damage control. I guess that heckling from the last engagement, made them realize the problem is not going away😏 They report: “These decisions have been the King’s, given the serious lapses of judgment which his brother has shown.” Andrew will move to a private property at Sandringham, funded by Charles. Sarah Ferguson will make her own arrangements. Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie retain their titles.” “Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse.” “The King consulted the Government, acting “with support of the wider family, including the Prince of Wales”.🤭 The comedy. 2 weeks ago, BP allowed Andrew to call the shot and make his own announcement where he was suppose to retain his titles and home. Now, 2 weeks after a public dragging and shaming, after 2 weeks of dragging William’s name as the “ruthless” driving force, finally BP wants to credit KC as the driving force who deems it necessary to make his own decision and finally ACT to protect his reign and his name😏 When you want to be seen as a “decisive” leader, you act decisively at the beginning, not after public scandal and pressure from the government and pressure from all parts force your hand🤷🏽‍♀️ This should have been the initial announcement. The fact that it comes now after BP tried to blame William, Parliament, the dead Queen Elizabeth and even tried to involve Catherine in this fiasco, it is very clear, this is damage control and not a genuine decision. A representative from Whitehall already stated in an interview that “only one Royal was pushing for this and that was William.”🔥 So Spare us the empty platitudes. The only thing we ask is that the palace follows through with their words, and truly strip Andrew. I will applaud when it is complete☕️

Canellecitadelle

3,301,324 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I found Royston's comments quite interesting, like so many other commentators he's managed to place all responsibility of what occurred on William and Catherine's shoulders, as well as suggesting it is their 𝘥𝘶𝘵𝘺 to repair the relationship (meaning 'get over it') So many thoughts.. 🤔 Notice that Royston says Harry 'does talk about a lot of stuff'. And 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 everything H has talked about - what he has said, and how that has impacted his family. Especially William, Catherine and their young children. Then Royston talks about there being times Queen Elizabeth had needed to put the 'national interest' and the 'country's interest' above her feelings as a person, and above the interests as her family. And that King Charles as monarch will need to do the same. But Royston then goes on to say it's in the Royal family's interests to solve their own family problems, and that they are supposed to show 'leadership' in Britain. And that it's not leadership, or healthy, advisable or wise to let conflict escalate and escalate, and that the public think families should be able to resolve conflict. So he's suggesting the family are not fulfilling their role by having 'unresolved' issues with Harry. He said QE had put her family (Andrew) aside for the best interest of the monarchy and nation, but he seems to believe that either KC or PW putting Harry aside (after doing everything he's done) is not in the best interests. Notice the different expectations for each problematic son? (What Royston says next he's previously talked about, when discussing H+Ms work with bullying. That the issues in KP demonstrated H+M's inability to resolve issues) 🤨 I have so many issues with Royston's comments. He says it's not good to have things 'escalate'. But things 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯'𝘵 escalating now, certainly not by William and Catherine's doing. Grey rocking is working. Royston seems to place responsibly for what happened in those two years (and since then) on William and Catherine, and KP. But we now know there were so many other issues occurring at the same time, that the problems were bigger than simply workplace squabbles. And when you consider 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘭𝘴𝘦 that had happened in the decades 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 and the years 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 2017 - 2019, it's ridiculous to suggest this can be summed up as a 'workplace issue' at KP. I place a lot of responsibility for what happened with Harry and M on QE as monarch, and KC as father. H has had a lifetime of issues, and these were poorly managed by both his family and the monarchy. He is jealous, unstable, bitter and vengeful. And she is a histrionic narcissist. Harry and M were poorly handled, from the start. It should not have been KPs responsibility to manage them or deal with them. Anyone with any awareness of what has transpired over the last 𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 knows what Harry and his wife have done. William and Catherine have wisely set boundaries to protect themselves and their children. It's cruel to suggest they should risk their wellbeing, and what they are building and protecting for the children. William is not his brother's keeper. People need to stop infantilising Harry, who is in his 5th decade. He made his decisions - not every relationship can or should be repaired back to the way it was.

mrc 🦇

11,484 просмотров • 1 год назад

THE SEVEN SEALS The same day the Church is taken out of this world at the Rapture, judgement begins. As it was in the days of Noah, the same day Noah entered the ark, the judgement began. The same day Lot left Sodom, fire came from heaven and destroyed them all. So it is, on the same day that the Church leaves this world, at the Rapture, the Judgment begins. SEAL 1 - The Conqueror (The Revealing of the Antichrist). The Man on the White Horse. Rev 6:2 And I saw, and behold, a white horse, and he that sat thereon had a bow; and there was given unto him a crown: and he came forth conquering, and to conquer After the rapture of the Church,2 Thess.6v7 the first thing that happens in the earth is that the antichrist is revealed; a white horse and its rider. This is not the Lord Jesus- i.) “He that sat on the horse had a bow”, Jesus doesn’t use a bow, when you see Jesus, He uses a Sword. ii.) “A crown was given to him”- Jesus is King of Kings; He gives crowns. Rev.6v2 iii.) “He went forth conquering and to conquer”. The Lord Jesus is only going to battle against the Nations at the second coming, which is not yet So this is not Jesus, this is the antichrist. He had a bow, without arrows. He would conquer nations without firing a shot, he would conquer nations with peace; they would give their nations to him. Daniel 8:23-24 describes a powerful king who will arise at the end of a period of time, characterized by transgression and wickedness. This king will have a fierce appearance, understand dark schemes, and wield mighty power, not by his own means, but through extraordinary destruction. He will succeed in what he does, destroying the mighty and the holy people. SEAL 2- Conflict on Earth: Killings, Murders (The Man on the Red Horse) Daniel 6v3- 4 When He opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature saying, “Come [b]and see.” 4 Another horse, fiery red, went out. And it was granted to the one who sat on it to take peace from the earth, and that people should kill one another; and there was given to him a great sword. Once the Church is gone at the Rapture, no more peace on the earth, there would be killings. Matt.24v7,10 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, [a]pestilences, and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. 9 “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake. 10 And then many will be offended, will betray one another, and will hate one another. Rev.13v15 15 He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. SEAL 3- Scarcity (Inflation and Famine) The Man on the Black Horse Daniel 6v5-6 When He opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, “Come and see.” So I looked, and behold, a black horse, and he who sat on it had a pair of scales[c] in his hand. 6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four living creatures saying, “A [d]quart of wheat for a [e]denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius; and do not harm the oil and the wine. Lamentations 4v4-10 AMP [4] The tongue of the infant clings To the roof of its mouth because of thirst; The little ones ask for food, But no one gives it to them. [5] Those who feasted on delicacies Are perishing in the streets; Those reared in purple [as nobles] Embrace ash heaps. [6] For the [punishment of the] wickedness of the daughter of my people [Jerusalem] Is greater than the [punishment for the] sin of Sodom, Which was overthrown in a moment, And no hands were turned toward her [to offer help]. [7] Her princes were purer than snow, They were whiter than milk [in appearance]; They were more ruddy in body than rubies, Their polishing was like lapis lazuli (sapphire). [8] Their appearance is [now] blacker than soot [because of the prolonged famine]; They are not recognized in the streets; Their skin clings to their bones; It is withered, and it has become [dry] like wood. [9] Those killed with the sword Are more fortunate than those killed with hunger; For the hungry pine and ebb away, For the lack of the fruits of the field. [10] The hands of compassionate women Boiled their own children; They became food for them Because of the destruction of the daughter of my people [Judah]. Ezekiel 4v10-12, 17 AMP [10] The food you eat each day shall be [measured] by weight, twenty shekels, to be eaten daily at a set time. [11] You shall drink water by measure also, the sixth part of a hin; you shall drink daily at a set time. [12] You shall eat your food as barley cakes, having baked it in their sight over human dung.” [17] because bread and water will be scarce; and they will look at one another in dismay and waste away [in punishment] for their wickedness. If you think there are economic problems right now in the world, this is nothing compared to what is coming. No one would be able to solve the economic problem then, not even the antichrist. He would make promises, but would fail. This is going to be a very terrible time on earth. At this point the peace treaty is broken and the next three and a half years begins SEAL 4- Widespread Death on Earth (Death Released) A Pale(green) Horse with a rider called- Death, and Hell Followed. Rev.6v7 -8 7 When He opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature saying, “Come and see.” 8 So I looked, and behold, a pale horse. And the name of him who sat on it was Death, and Hades followed with him. And [f]power was given to them over a fourth of the earth, to kill with sword, with hunger, with death, and by the beasts of the earth. These are the judgments of God, not even the actions taken by the antichrist. The world is being punished for their rejection of Jesus Christ. Killings with the sword, refers to war. Matt 24v21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” (KJV) The Fourth and Fifth Seals are in the second 3 and a half years, after the Peace treaty has been broken. 1 Thess. 5v3 -4 For when they shall say, peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. At this time the antichrist enters into the temple in Jerusalem and from then on, fierce persecution begins. SEAL 5- The Cry of the Tribulation Saints (Killed for their Faith) Rev 6v9-11 When He opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the testimony which they held. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, until You judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” 11 Then a white robe was given to each of them; and it was said to them that they should rest a little while longer, until both the number of their fellow servants and their brethren, who would be killed as they were, was completed. When a godly man dies, he goes to heaven and his soul is without a body, but is clothed with a spiritual garment until the resurrection. At the rapture, those who were dead in Christ were raised up with a glorified body, and we that are alive and remain were caught and changed into that same glorified body. The tribulation saints who were slain for their faith, they gave their lives as a sacrifice to God, they refused to take the mark of the beast, and were killed. Their souls are seen in Heaven under the Altar, without their spiritual glorified bodies, hence their cry. Vr 11 the Lord told them to rest for a while until others to be killed like them also arrive. At this time too something happens, there is more preaching of the gospel ongoing in the earth, Evangelism intensifies. Rev.14: 14 And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle. 15 And another angel came out of the temple, crying with a loud voice to him that sat on the cloud, Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; for the harvest of the earth is ripe. Here the Tribulation Saints are Raptured, which is getting to the ending part of the tribulation period. #YLWSPECIALSSeason1Phase3 #RaptureModeActivated #RaptureReady #FirstFlightGang #YearOfCompleteness

SeyiB

15,646 просмотров • 1 год назад

It’s time to expose Toyota. Toyota USA has been one of the most trusted brands in America but they’ve gone totally woke. Here’s some of what we found: • Toyota sponsored a drag queen program at a summer camp for kids identifying as LGBTQ+. • Toyota opposes laws that ban sex changes for kids and funds groups who work to make sex changes legal for children and they worked with the Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response to oppose these laws. • Toyota openly supports “the equality act" which would allow men into girl’s bathrooms, sports and locker-rooms. • Toyota funded the Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response’s Time To Thrive Summit where they worked with the largest teachers union to push gender ideology into elementary schools. • Donated to the HRC, the Trevor Project, Dallas Resource Center and Los Angeles LGBT Center and the Workplace Equality Summit — All supporters of child transitions. The Trevor Project features chat rooms where adults have been caught talking to kids about sexual kinks, how to transition, masturbation and more. They also have a quick exit feature to wipe the browser and hide the website from parents. • Funded many "all ages" pride events. • Woke DEI trainings. • LGBT Chamber of Commerce member. • Preferential treatment for "diverse" suppliers. • Hosted LGBTQ+ events at corporate. • Created custom cars with a trans flag. • ERG groups divided by race + sexual orientation. • A total commitment to DEI policies. • 100/100 CEI score from the HRC for 16 straight years which means that they pay for not only employee transitions but for children of employee’s to transition in states where it’s legal. To put it mildly, Toyota seems to have forgotten who their core customers are. They depend on American families and Japanese families to buy their cars. It’s time to remind them who their customers are. I don’t think the values at corporate reflect the values many Toyota/Lexus owners have (with the exception of maybe Prius owners who probably like the woke stuff). Do Toyota/Lexus owners want the money they spend with Toyota to be used later by corporate to push an ideology that’s diametrically opposed to their own values? If you think Toyota’s values don’t align with yours and you’re a customer or potential customer who wants to speak out, their contact info is ⬇️ Remember to ALWAYS BE KIND. Many in customer service agree with you. These are all publicly listed contacts: Toyota customer care: +1-800-331-4331 Specific Emails: Ed Hellwig 469-292-1165 [email protected] Marissa Borjon 469-292-6395 [email protected] Victor Vanov 469-292-1318 [email protected] Contact them with one click: Our goal with reporting is never destruction, it’s restoration of sanity. We do this by informing consumers about the policies companies are adopting so they can make choices about what they’re willing to support as a consumer. That’s not cancel culture, it’s capitalism. When we use our voices and wallets to vote our values, we can change the world and we can restore great companies to a culture of sanity, meritocracy and political neutrality OR we can inspire competitors to step up to fight for our business. The customer is king and most of us just want companies we shop at to stop virtue signaling about divisive social, cultural and political issues. Companies need to stop dividing us by injecting wokeness! If you agree then share this video and tag other accounts so they share it too. If you support our movement to expose and remove woke policies in corporate America then you can help fund our growing team by subscribing to my X page for $5 a month or choose any amount once at You can become a whistleblower against a woke company at by emailing [email protected] or by going to P.S. What’s sad is there’s sooooo much more we couldn’t fit in this video. Maybe we’ll do a part 2 and/or drop key nuggets of information over the next few weeks… 🤔

Robby Starbuck

5,514,561 просмотров • 1 год назад

A powerful scene in the Odyssey comes when Odysseus finally returns to Ithaca after twenty years of war and wandering. You'd expect the story to end with a great celebration: with the hero coming home and the family reunited. Homer does something far stranger. Odysseus arrives disguised as a beggar, because Athena warns him that the palace has been taken over by more than a hundred suitors who have been living there for years, eating his food, drinking his wine, and pressuring his wife Penelope to marry one of them. They believe Odysseus is dead and in their minds the kingdom is already theirs. So the king of Ithaca walks through his own halls dressed in rags while the men stealing his house sit comfortably at his tables. They mock him, throw scraps at him, and one of them even strikes him, and Odysseus takes it. The same man who blinded the Cyclops now stands quietly while strangers insult him in his own home. Homer tells us his heart burns inside his chest and that he wants to attack them immediately, yet he restrains himself and waits. Instead of striking, Odysseus studies the room carefully. He counts the men, watches their habits, and observes which servants remain loyal and which have betrayed him. He delays his revenge until the moment is right. Eventually Penelope announces a contest and brings out Odysseus' great bow, declaring that she will marry the man who can string it and shoot an arrow through twelve axe heads lined up in a row. One by one the suitors try and fail, because none of them can even bend the bow. Then the beggar asks for a turn. The suitors laugh at first, but the bow is eventually handed to him. Odysseus takes it in his hands and strings it effortlessly. Homer says the sound of the bowstring tightening rings through the hall like the note of a swallow. Then he places an arrow on the string and sends it cleanly through all twelve axe heads. In that moment the beggar disappears. Odysseus turns the bow toward the suitors and reveals who he is. What follows is one of the most brutal scenes in Greek literature. The doors are sealed and the suitors realize too late that they are trapped inside the hall. Odysseus, his son Telemachus, and two loyal servants begin killing them one by one. There is no escape and no negotiation. The men who spent years consuming another man's house die inside it. It is a violent ending, but Homer wants you to understand something important. The real danger to Odysseus was never just the monsters and storms along the journey. It was the possibility that someone else might take his place while he was gone. When Odysseus finally returns, he reminds everyone in Ithaca of a simple truth: A man's home is never truly his unless he is willing to fight for it. --- Join our online book club and study the classics with us! We are working through the great texts of the Western canon, including the Homeric epics: To preserve a culture, you must continually study the books and ideas that created it. If the schools and universities won't teach the great books of the West, we will do it ourselves... We are an independent group funded ENTIRELY by the members of this community. If you'd like to support us, please consider a paid membership. You'll get: - Live book club discussions (biweekly) - Essays to guide you through the books we're reading - The full archive of discussions and essays - Access to the community chat room See you inside!

Athenaeum Book Club

351,746 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This is Professor Ellen Rungani, the daughter of the Zimbabwean national hero buried two days ago, Brigadier-General Victor Chikudo Rungani. She is explaining how her father died, three hospitals could not provide him with a mere ventilator. General Victor Chikudo Rungani was 76 years old when he passed away at Mbuya Dorcas Hospital in Harare on April 22. He was honoured with a national hero’s burial at the National Heroes Acre. His wife, Senator Anna Rungani, is a member of the Zimbabwean Parliament under the ruling ZANUPF party, this is no ordinary Zimbabwean family, they are part of the pollical elite class of Zimbabwe. When the general fell ill, he was taken to a military hospital in Harare at Josiah Magama Tongogara Barracks, formerly known as KG6—short for King George VI, after whom the barracks were originally named. The military hospital there was so ill-equipped that it lacked the most basic medical equipment he needed, a ventilator. The military hospital could only provide a nebuliser, something that you and I can buy over the counter in a pharmacy. A nebuliser is a medical device used to administer medication in the form of a mist, which is inhaled into the lungs. It is commonly used for people with respiratory conditions such as asthma and other lung diseases. The general was then taken to Zimbabwe’s largest public health facility, the Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals, but still, no ventilator was available for him there. He was stuck there for days without a ventilator. He was subsequently taken to Westend Hospital, whose medical resources running into multiple millions of dollars were looted and plundered by government officials, including the President’s spokesman, George Charamba; yet again, no ventilator was found for the general to save his wife. Finally, he was taken to the ZAOGA church-owned Mbuya Dorcas Hospital in Harare’s Waterfalls suburb. By then, it was too late. The general died there simply because the public hospitals had no ventilators for him to use, and as a result, he caught a respiratory infection that probably killed him. When I speak about the importance of equipping public hospitals, it is because moments like this inevitably arise, where people die needlessly. I say these things because these public hospitals serve all of us regardless of political party affiliation or views, Despite being a general, a decorated war veteran and hero, an illustrious soldier and the husband of a senator, Brigadier-General Victor Chikudo Rungani died because Emmerson Mnangagwa has deliberately failed to provide basic medical equipment in public hospitals, due to the corruption he presides over as the Godfather of looting cartels. The NovaVent ventilator costs only US$500, and a standard low end hospital ventilator starts from around US$5,000, yet none was available to save this illustrious war hero and highly decorated general whose wife is a ZANUPF senator. All because Zimbabwe has a corrupt president who does not care about the citizens and only cares about looting public funds and enriching his family and inner circle of his clansmen. Seven years ago, I warned Zimbabweans that the entire country had only seven ventilators, mostly in private hospitals. Nobody in politics and authority listened and did something about my warning. Two years later, after my ominous warning, COVID-19 struck, and the first person to die because there was no ventilator was up-and-coming highly talented broadcaster, Zororo Makamba, who passed away on 23 March 2020. His father, James Makamba, is currently a ZANUPF Member of Parliament representing Mashonaland Central Province. I repeated the same call again a day after Zororo had died. I reminded Zimbabweans that one Range Rover can buy 80 hospital ventilators, which cost US$5,000 each. Instead of hanging their heads in shame, Mnangagwa and his thugs sent me to jail without trial for saying these things. Since then, Mnangagwa’s regime has bought thousands of Range Rovers for his inner circle in government and state-owned enterprises, known in Zimbabwe as parastatals, yet only a US$5,000 ventilator was needed to save the life of the general! Very little has changed since I made my first call to action about equipping public hospitals with ventilators. More Zimbabweans will continue to die, in both high and low places, until Zimbabweans decide that enough is enough and demand and action sanity. Emmerson Mnangagwa and his two deputies, General Constantino Chiwenga and Kembo Mohadi, receive medical treatment abroad when they fall ill. The money they spend on a single hospital check-up in China, India, Dubai or South Africa could equip the military hospital or Parirenyatwa with ventilators and essential medical supplies, but they do not care, because it does not affect them! The stupidity of Zimbabwean leaders lies in their failure to understand that the money they spend on private jets to China, Dubai, India or South Africa looking for healthcare could equip all public hospitals with the very equipment they travel abroad for. They could be treated at home, and so could everyone else, but Mnangagwa doesn’t care at all about these life and death issues. The breathtaking stupidity of ZANUPF leaders, once predicted by Ian Smith and dismissed then as racist ranting, is now confirmed in Zimbabwe to the whole world daily. Now one of their own has died because they could not place a simple ventilator in a military hospital. Forget about public hospitals for us, the Povo, these ZANUPF leaders are so stupid they cannot even equip their own private military hospitals! What a useless and shameless bunch of clueless leaders! Things are so bad in Zimbabwean hospitals that South Africa had to evacuate one of its nationals by helicopter from Zimbabwe last week so they could receive proper yet basic medical attention. The tragic reality is that when I offered to supply this medical equipment to hospitals for free using my international networks and goodwill, the political class ganged up to demonise me, thinking I wanted to enter politics by helping people. To all those who did not understand why it is important to let those of us who have the capacity to equip these hospitals for free, this is your answer. Corrupt rule does not discriminate; it will find you regardless of who you are in society. You could be very wealthy, but if you are involved in a car accident in Murambinda or Tsholotsho, you will need emergency healthcare to stabilise you before being transferred to a hospital for the wealthy. You will not make it, you will die, along with all that money. Only because you didn’t realise the importance of equipping public hospitals for the poor and the ordinary when you still had the power to do so! I am sure you heard from the professor that her father, an illustrious war hero and military man, was taken to the private section of Parirenyatwa Public Hospital. This means that even the private section of this hospital, which used to be well equipped and where important political figures were once treated, has now collapsed too. Zimbabwe’s first post-colonial First Lady, Sally Mugabe, was treated there. The late Vice President Joshua Nkomo was treated there, as was the late Vice President Simon Muzenda. But under Mnangagwa, even the VIP section of this once-great hospital is now dilapidated and can’t provide for something so basic as a ventilator. Mnangagwa is so demented that he steals public money meant for hospitals, and when these high-profile figures die from his negligence and corrupt rule, he spends millions of state money on their funerals and burials. The state money used on the general’s funeral and burial was more than enough to have saved him and many other ordinary Zimbabweans, had the corrupt dictator simply invested in public hospitals. Meanwhile, the past, current and future victims of this man’s negligence are at the forefront of wanting him to continue misruling the country until 2030. Why, then, do we get angry when other nationalities call us stupid? Until Zimbabweans unite to fight this corrupt dictator as one, his political negligence and criminal misrule will continue to kill them one by one. Kuzvitambira kana kusazvitambira (ukuzamukela noma ukungamukeli), the truth remains what it is, factual!

Hopewell Chin’ono

105,864 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Daily Mail’s Royal Vendetta: A Month of Smears on William and Catherine, Followed by Crocodile Tears In the sweltering heat of August and September 2025, the Daily Mail unleashed a torrent of vitriol against Prince William, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, and even King Charles III. What began as whispers about a family home move quickly snowballed into a full-scale assault: accusations of “control freak” tendencies, “underwhelming” duties, a “dark past” tied to slavery, and hints of irreparable rifts. Collages of headlines tell the story — dozens of pieces from the Mail’s royal “hit squad,” peddling speculation as fact, while royal watchers cried “propaganda!” after every drop. This wasn’t journalism. It was SEO warfare dressed up as reporting, cynically timed to ride search trends like “William lazy,” “Kate health,” and “Charles succession,” while dangling glowing comparisons to bait Sussex fans. The Mail’s royal desk has turned itself into a digital sweatshop where outrage is the currency. Every article is deliberately contradictory — William is “too private” one day, “too performative” the next; Catherine is “influential but holding him back”; Charles is “weak but meddling.” Why? Because conflict sells. Rage-clicks fill MailOnline’s coffers. It’s the business model of chaos — and chaos is the coin of their grubby little realm. Now, in a twist worthy of their own soap-opera scripts, two of the Mail’s most prolific royal scribblers— Rebecca English and Richard Eden —have pivoted to pearl-clutching exposés about a “sinister plot” and “calculated wedge” undermining William and Catherine. It’s laughable. These aren’t brave whistleblowers; they’re architects of the very narrative they’re now decrying. The Daily Mail didn’t just report the hate—they manufactured it, weaponised it, monetised it, and now want to wash their hands as if they were bystanders. It’s the Fleet Street equivalent of throwing petrol on a bonfire, then sobbing that one’s eyebrows got singed. The Mail’s hypocrisy is breathtaking. For weeks, they ran columns dripping with Sussex apologia — Griffiths acting as Harry’s stenographer and Platell recycling Meghan’s grievances as “concerns,” and A.N. Wilson psychoanalysing William from his study like some amateur Freud-for-hire. All this while YouTube commenters and even their own readers blasted their Royals channel as “toxic propaganda.” But rather than adjust course, they doubled down — until subscribers fled and advertisers grew squeamish. Only then did the pivot to victimhood begin. One could almost hear the gnashing of teeth in Kensington High Street. Let’s expose the rot at the heart of this tabloid machine — how they orchestrated the smears, gamed the algorithms, amplified Sussex narratives, twisted facts into weapons, and how their financial decline drives the cruelty. The curtain must be pulled back, and the stagehands caught red-handed, script in one hand, calculator in the other. The Hit Parade: A Catalogue of Calculated Cruelty From 1 August to 27 September 2025, the Daily Mail’s royal desk became a factory for anti-Wales ammunition, deploying a multi-pronged strategy: recycle old grudges into fresh headlines, cherry-pick data to misrepresent workloads, sensationalise historical trivia, and frame every decision as evidence of impending royal collapse. The trigger? William and Catherine’s pragmatic decision to relocate from Adelaide Cottage to Forest Lodge on the Sandringham estate — a “forever home” for family stability amid Catherine’s cancer recovery and global threats. What should have been a non-story morphed into “proof” of William’s fatal flaws: too private, too lazy, too “woke,” too everything. In short, too damned convenient for the Mail’s search engine tinkering. This was not random. The Mail runs on click-chains: one “exclusive” generates spinoffs, which are then linked in sidebars, ensuring readers never escape the outrage cycle. Eviction headlines lead into slavery history “revelations,” which link to workload hit pieces, which in turn promote YouTube debate clips. It is algorithmic entrapment sold as news — a kind of journalistic mousetrap baited with bile. Here’s the rogue’s gallery of the worst offenders, their pieces dripping with pro-Sussex favoritism and wild conjecture, broken down by tactic: • Amanda Platell (Columnist): On 20 August, Platell sneered at William’s “puny” 71 engagements, cherry-picking incomplete 2024 figures and ignoring health crises in the family. She compared him unfavourably to Princess Anne and accused him of making the Firm “pure vanilla.” Platell’s column was SEO-stuffed with phrases like “workshy heir” and “royal crisis” — all designed to trend on Google and bait shares. Her follow-ups even recycled Meghan’s old “baby brain” anecdote as if it were fresh ammunition. This isn’t journalism; it’s content farming — and farming in barren soil at that. • Christopher Wilson (Historian/Columnist): On 23 August, Wilson exhumed Forest Lodge’s “dark past,” weaponising obscure history to frame William and Catherine as morally negligent. The piece was algorithmically tied to MailOnline’s “slavery legacy” tag — the same tag used to cover Netflix’s colonial dramas. It wasn’t about informing readers; it was about capturing traffic off unrelated cultural debates. Like a ghoul rifling through parish records for sport. • A.N. Wilson (Royal Author): On 19 September, he declared William “angry and unhappy,” citing outdated stats and palace whispers. But more insidious was the Mail’s packaging: push alerts framed it as a “shock diagnosis,” with sidebars linking to Sussex puff pieces. William’s Earthshot success was buried, Harry’s “fun scamp” antics headlined. Manipulation by design, as brazen as a conjurer’s sleight of hand. • Charlotte Griffiths (Royal Correspondent): On 13 September, Griffiths painted William as the villain blocking Harry’s reconciliation. Her reliance on “anonymous sources” was classic Mail — unverifiable quotes crafted to fuel fan wars online. Each story was cross-promoted under MailOnline’s “Sussex comeback” hub, ensuring clicks from both sides of the aisle. Division is profitable, and she is its clerk of works. • Liz Jones (Columnist): On 5 September, Jones targeted Kate’s “bronde” hair during a visit to the Natural History Museum gardens, mixing sharp critique with grudging praise. Trolls called the lighter shade “washed out” or a “wig,” but Jones framed it as smart and empowering, signalling Kate’s post-cancer confidence. Her long history of nitpicking Kate’s hair — from 2012 bangs to post-2024 hospital styles — fits the pattern: personal opinion masquerading as insight, always driving clicks. She also recently editorialised against William as a future king, questioning his temperament and charisma, further stoking debate and subtly undermining the heir apparent. • Tina Brown (via Mail amplification): Brown’s Vanity Fair critiques were sliced into fragments and drip-fed as “Mail exclusives.” This is another trick: repackaging syndicated content as fresh scoops, maximising monetisation while disguising the recycling. In Fleet Street terms, it’s reheated cabbage passed off as coq au vin. • Rebecca English & Richard Eden: Even before their pivot, both poured fuel on the fire. English questioned the Forest Lodge move as a “taxpayer gamble” (24 September). Eden mocked it as indecisiveness (18 September). Both columns carried DailyMailPlus paywall teasers, designed to convert outrage into subscriptions. This wasn’t reporting. It was a coordinated content strategy: anonymous sourcing (cheap and unverifiable), data manipulation (engagement cherry-picking), and emotional framing (slavery, evictions, family rifts) — all calculated to maximise page dwell-time and comments. It’s the cynical mechanics of Fleet Street turned up to eleven, all brass band and no tune. The Asinine Pivot: From Smear-Mongers to Victimhood By late September, the Mail faced a problem: the narrative it had stoked was now boomeranging. Readers began calling out bias, subscribers fled, and Palace Confidential was haemorrhaging viewers. Cue the pivot. • On 25 September, Eden wailed about a “sinister plot.” • On 26 September, English warned of a “wedge between Charles and William.” Both pieces were smoke and mirrors. They rehashed earlier reporting — their own reporting — while pretending to be alarmed that anti-Wales narratives were spreading. Classic Mail: start the fire, then play the firefighter. They build the echo chamber, harvest the clicks, and when the backlash hits, shrug and blame “external forces.” It is not just hypocrisy — it is fraud. Fraud against readers, against journalism, against public trust. A betrayal wrapped in bunting. YouTube Implosion: Palace Confidential’s Monarchy Meltdown The nadir came mid-September when the Mail’s Palace Confidential channel speculated if William’s reign would “end the monarchy.” The video was a montage of the very print smears their own desk had churned out — workload cherry-picking, rift whispers, Forest Lodge doom-mongering. Within days, subscribers plummeted by the thousands. Comment sections filled with accusations of “hateful propaganda.” Forensic look at the analytics shows watch-time collapsing, click-through rates nosediving. Why? Because even Mail loyalists saw through the con. They were watching for the same reheated slop, dressed up as “exclusive debate.” According to VidIQ data, the Daily Mail Royals YouTube channel currently shows around 482,000 subscribers and has amassed over 313 million total video views. While those are nontrivial numbers, the channel’s estimated monthly earnings do not vindicate the hours of content churn — often in the modest range of £14,580–44,550 depending on viewership and ad engagement. In other words, the editorial excess is not being rewarded by proportionate audience loyalty or monetisation growth — the metrics are flat or weakening under scrutiny. Tubics data earlier in 2025 had placed the Daily Mail Royals subscriber count at ~464,000 with a view count ~292 million, indicating very slow growth — a channel in stagnation rather than ascendancy. This wasn’t content collapse; it was audience striking back. The vox populi spoke — and it said, enough. Follow the Money: The Mail’s Financial Desperation To understand why the Daily Mail behaves this way, you must follow the money. The pathology of smear campaigns is fed by urgent financial pressure. • Print decline: As of June 2025, the Daily Mail’s audited daily circulation stood at ~631,191 copies. That figure reflects a dramatic shrinkage over years — the paper, once selling well into multiple hundreds of thousands more, is now hollowed out. • Yearly comparisons: In 2024, ABC audit figures showed the Daily Mail had a daily circulation of 706,839 — meaning circulation has dropped by over 10% in roughly a year. • Advertiser exodus: In January 2025, the Mail announced it would merge its print and online teams and initiate cost-cutting, as major advertisers increasingly balk at brand adjacency with toxic, polarising content. The memo revealed that Mail+ (the paywall arm) had achieved 100,000 paying subscribers since its launch — a modest number given the scale of MailOnline’s reach. • Staff cuts as symptom: This internal restructuring is not optional — it is a forced retreat. Under the integration plan, job losses are anticipated. • Parent group pressure: DMG Media, the Mail’s owner, has made it clear that the print-online integration is about survival in a hostile advertising environment and declining print returns. In short, the Mail is bleeding. These royal smear campaigns aren’t just editorial cynicism — they’re a press outlet in full panic, scrabbling for clicks, subscriptions, and relevance by flogging scandal, outrage, and division. It’s the frantic thrashing of a swimmer who knows the tide has turned against them. Dirty Hands, No Excuses: Time to Hold the Mail Accountable The Daily Mail’s hands aren’t just dirty — they’re smeared, ink-stained with the fingerprints of manipulation. This wasn’t an accident, not a slip of the editorial pen. It was deliberate. They gamed algorithms like card sharks stacking a deck, pitted fandoms against one another like gladiators in the Coliseum, and weaponised history, health, and grief as if they were trinkets to be traded for clicks. CharlotteGriffiths , Amanda Platell, A.N. Wilson, Tina Brown, Liz Jones Goddess and the rest dutifully acted as stenographers for Sussex spin; Rebecca English and Richard Eden cried about “plots” they themselves had stoked; and editors signed off on every exaggeration, knowing that rage pays the bills. And now, when the wind shifts, they dare pivot to victimhood — as if they were the collateral and not the culprits. It’s theatre. Bad theatre. And the damage? It’s carved into public trust like graffiti on a listed building. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. William and Catherine ride out the storm with quiet resilience, their 74% approval proving that duty and dignity still matter. The monarchy carries on; the Mail only carries on as long as division sells. Readers aren’t fooled. Legacy media is collapsing under the weight of its own duplicity. Advertisers abandoned The Sun after Hillsborough. News of the World collapsed after phone hacking. And the Daily Mail — drunk on its own poison — is staggering toward the same graveyard. This was never “just gossip.” It was calculated sabotage dressed up in broadsheet clothing, a smear campaign masquerading as reportage, a racket that hollowed out the very idea of journalism. They didn’t just observe events; they made them happen. They didn’t reflect public opinion; they twisted it. They didn’t hold power to account; they abused it. The case is closed. The Waleses endure — proof that quiet service and real substance always outlast scandal. The Mail’s hit squad, by contrast, are done. History won’t remember them as kingmakers, only as mercenaries who confused clickbait for craft and outrage for insight, and in the process wrote their own obituaries. They won’t go down as journalists; they’ll go down as clickbait casualties — yesterday’s men and women, swept away by the very tide they tried to ride. #BoycottDailyMail #WeAreTheMediaNow #RoyalSmearCampaign #ExposeTheMail #MediaManipulation #StopTheSpin #TabloidTyranny #FakeNewsFactory #MonarchyVsMedia #FleetStreetFraud #TruthOverClickbait #InkStainedLies

༺𝐻𝑅𝐻 𝐿𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒥༻ 👑

29,572 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад