Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A new study has provided compelling evidence that Earth, shortly after its formation, was initially dry and lifeless, lacking the essential building blocks for life, such as water and organic compounds. Using precise measurements of the radioactive decay of manganese-53 into chromium-53 in meteorites and terrestrial rocks, the researchers...

45,254 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

Dado Barrozo's profile picture
Dado Barrozo1 year ago

A 2023 study suggests that inside the Earth there are likely remnants of Theia's mantle, which broke off during the giant impact that also formed the Moon and were too dense to fully mix with Earth's mantle, settling at the core-mantle boundary.

nick's profile picture
nick1 year ago

Our form of life. Perhaps another form had it's chances obliterated when the impact occurred.

BSEC-WALES's profile picture
BSEC-WALES1 year ago

How did it get the name Theia? Just thinking of linguistics God/Theology etc.

Erika 's profile picture
Erika 1 year ago

The name Theia comes from Greek mythology: Theia was a Titaness, the mother of Selene, the goddess of the Moon. Astronomers chose it because the hypothetical Mars-sized body is thought to have created the Moon when it collided with Earth. So the name links directly to the Moon’s mythological origins.

david's profile picture
david1 year ago

I thought there were civilizations that remember when the moon wasn’t there? Hopi, Zulu, and ancient Greeks. Could just be fairytales I guess.

Alexander Hellberg's profile picture
Alexander Hellberg1 year ago

No.

Pixelwavbyte's profile picture
Pixelwavbyte1 year ago

That correlates with the Genesis record.

DeanWeiss's profile picture
DeanWeiss1 year ago

If true, this is a huge filter in the Fermi Paradox, that any planet in the habital zone of it's star may not have enough volatiles & requires a large input from the edge of it's planetary system to potentially develop life.

Cyril Haessig's profile picture
Cyril Haessig1 year ago

When luck strikes ...

Jay Yadav Geologist's profile picture
Jay Yadav Geologist1 year ago

At the begining the Earth was in molten state. Mafic Crusts were created and destroyed and earth evolved. Most of the theories suggest that life evolved in the oceans. Around 2.4 billion years ago cyanobactria began profucing free oxygen. In ordovician there was brust of life.

Thierry Jacquot's profile picture
Thierry Jacquot1 year ago

That does not contradict the fact that a major part (if not the whole) of the terrestrial water (and others volatiles) is thought to come from the outer solar system (beyond the ice line). The paper seems to describe a new way of approaching the "late veneer" theory.

Q's profile picture
Q1 year ago

This is a Realm. The moon is not a floating rock. Oceans are not convex.

Paul's profile picture
Paul1 year ago

Then how are there so many element isotope matches between Earth / moon (2003 study)? If Theia actually happened, there should be a mix between the two bodies, not complete symmetry with Earth's composition. I'm a Theia skeptic until somebody can answer that one...

Erika 's profile picture
Erika 1 year ago

Early models of the Giant Impact did predict different isotopic signatures, but later high-resolution studies suggest the impact was so energetic that Earth and Theia’s material mixed thoroughly before the Moon formed, erasing most differences. Some newer models also propose Theia had a very similar composition to Earth to begin with, since both likely formed in the same region of the Solar System. So the isotopic match doesn’t rule out the Theia hypothesis; it’s actually become one of the central challenges driving refinements of the model.

Steven Webb's profile picture
Steven Webb1 year ago

More plausible is Genesis 1:1.

St. Grimace's profile picture
St. Grimace1 year ago

This feels like a Great Filter.

Brynn Rogers's profile picture
Brynn Rogers1 year ago

That's silly. Everyone knows the moon is like swiss cheese and inhabited. Take a look at this:

Paul Hylton's profile picture
Paul Hylton1 year ago

Just a stroke ( strike) of luck that we are here then.

George Kent Colbath's profile picture
George Kent Colbath1 year ago

Yet another point for contingency over determinism. Does this imply that Venus, with no large impact generated moon, never had an ocean?

WXRISK GRAIN WEATHER's profile picture
WXRISK GRAIN WEATHER1 year ago

wow amazing video and reason

Outlaw Mike's profile picture
Outlaw Mike1 year ago

If that's true then imho, given the size of the Moon, and thus the even bigger size of Theia, it should still be possible to determine the location of the impact.

Erika 's profile picture
Erika 1 year ago

The exact impact site can’t really be pinpointed today because the collision would have melted and re-mixed Earth’s surface on a global scale, essentially erasing any “crater.” Instead of leaving a localized scar, the energy redistributed material across the whole planet, which is why we look to isotopes, simulations, and the Moon’s properties rather than geography to reconstruct where and how it happened.

doconnor's profile picture
doconnor1 year ago

Mars had water without a collision. Saturn's moon Titan has water ice and organic compounds.

Tidal Locked Jace's profile picture
Tidal Locked Jace1 year ago

There are still open questions to be answered with this theory, though. Isotopic similarity, volatile depletion, debris accretion, and angular momentum. I’m still leaning towards the Synestia theory. Which camp are you in on this?

Thee Flooring Guy's profile picture
Thee Flooring Guy1 year ago

We're just a statistical error right?

Jiyun Hyo's profile picture
Jiyun Hyo1 year ago

yes, i was there and i can indeed confirm this is true

Springblade 🇺🇸's profile picture
Springblade 🇺🇸1 year ago

Where did all of the water originate? Exactly when and where did the H and the O become smashed together to form H2O in the first place?

Erika 's profile picture
Erika 1 year ago

Hydrogen and oxygen themselves formed at very different times: hydrogen was created in the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, while most oxygen was forged much later inside massive stars and spread into space when those stars exploded as supernovae. Water H₂O likely formed when these elements mixed in cold interstellar clouds, where hydrogen and oxygen atoms combined on the surfaces of dust grains. Some of this water was locked into icy bodies, like comets and asteroids, that later delivered it to the young Earth.

David Wood's profile picture
David Wood1 year ago

Just pure luck, wow.

WalterWhite's profile picture
WalterWhite1 year ago

Wow. Very interesting. This sequence of events supports Brian Cox's claim that life in the universe is relatively rare.

GYERO Lurker's profile picture
GYERO Lurker1 year ago

New?

Alan Törni 🇫🇮🇸🇪🇺🇲🇩🇰🇧🇻🇮🇸's profile picture
Alan Törni 🇫🇮🇸🇪🇺🇲🇩🇰🇧🇻🇮🇸1 year ago

Why are we alone. Because!

Nanoteknologinen neuromodulaatio rokote's profile picture
Nanoteknologinen neuromodulaatio rokote1 year ago

kertooko tämän se sama tiede joka suosittelee sinulle kasvomaskia?

RainbowRenegade's profile picture
RainbowRenegade1 year ago

Fascinating! This aligns with recent research showing violent collisions weren't destructive—they were essential for habitability. The Theia impact delivered key volatiles and kick-started plate tectonics. Your animation captures how cosmic chaos became our foundation! 🌍✨

Related Videos

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “During the inception of our Universe, fortuitously arose a small possibility” : The author begins by noting that at the Universe’s origin, a slight chance emerged for the potential development of intelligence, framing this as a fortunate but improbable event inherent to cosmic conditions. 2. “that under certain circumstances there might come into existence at least a single primitive intelligent being” : This possibility hinged on specific conditions allowing for the emergence of even one basic intelligent entity, emphasizing the delicate and rare circumstances required for intelligence to arise. 3. “The planet upon which this would occur remained a mystery” : The author highlights that the specific location for this emergence was unknown, suggesting that no particular planet, including Earth, was predestined to host intelligence, reinforcing the randomness of the event. 4. “and the emergence of intelligence on Earth is not miraculous” : The development of intelligent life on Earth is presented as non-miraculous, a natural outcome of cosmic processes rather than a divine or extraordinary occurrence, grounded in chance. 5. “This could have materialized on another celestial body” : The author notes that intelligence could have arisen elsewhere in the Universe, on another planet or moon, underscoring the non-exclusive nature of Earth’s role in hosting intelligent life. 6. “and a thinking being similar to us would likewise ponder: why us, why here?” : If intelligence emerged elsewhere, those beings would ask the same existential questions as humans, reflecting on their own existence and location, highlighting a universal curiosity among intelligent life. 7. “It’s a matter of chance, you’re simply fortunate, your planet won the cosmic lottery” : The author concludes that the emergence of intelligence is purely a matter of luck, with Earth’s success likened to winning a cosmic lottery, emphasizing the role of random chance in our existence. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author posits that the Universe’s inception held a faint chance for intelligence to emerge under rare conditions, with Earth’s hosting of intelligent life being a non-miraculous outcome of cosmic chance. This could have occurred elsewhere, and any intelligent beings would question their existence, as we do. Our presence is a fortunate accident, Earth having won the cosmic lottery, prompting humility and curiosity about our place in a random, vast Universe. This perspective challenges us to embrace the improbability of our existence, fostering a sense of awe and responsibility to explore and understand the cosmos.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

1,649,356 views • 1 year ago

Jeff Bezos just described the Moon as a fuel depot, and the number behind it explains why nothing has ever left this planet cheaply. Bezos: “it has a very low gravitational field, only a sixth of Earth’s, which means it takes about 30 times less energy to lift a kilogram of mass off the Moon than it does to lift it off the Earth.” Thirty to one. That number rewrites the economics of everything beyond this planet. Every rocket ever launched has fought the same math. The fuel required to escape Earth is so heavy that most of what a rocket carries is the fuel needed to carry the fuel. The Moon breaks that cycle. It sits outside the well with water frozen in its shadowed craters, and water splits into hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen and oxygen are rocket fuel. Bezos: “the Moon is really a gift” Fill the tank up there instead of down here and the arithmetic of the entire solar system changes. Bezos: “So we can use the Moon as a rocket fuel depot to go to the rest of the solar system.” Not a destination. A gas station. Then there is the second constraint, which is that the sky itself runs on a schedule. Bezos: “unfortunately to get to other planetary bodies, they have very rare launch windows. Mars, you can go to Mars once every 26 months or so.” Miss the window and the answer is not next week. It is two years and change. Every world beyond our own operates on a timetable that does not care about human ambition. Bezos: “It’s so close to Earth. It’s only three and a half days away.” Except the Moon. The Moon is always there. Always reachable. That is what makes it the staging ground rather than the trophy. Apollo treated it as an endpoint, planted a flag, and came home. The flag was the mistake. A gas station is worth more than a monument. Monuments end the story. Infrastructure is what lets everyone who comes after take the trip for granted. Every era of exploration on Earth followed the same shape. Someone crossed once for glory, then someone built a port, and only after the port did ordinary people go. We have been staring at the Moon for three hundred thousand years thinking it was a destination. It was never the destination. It was the door. Every planet in the solar system just got closer. Not because the distances changed, but because the starting point did.

Dustin

37,008 views • 3 months ago