Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

A newly published human trial looked at 197 patients with over 20 different types of cancer, including metastatic cancers. After six months using ivermectin and mebendazole, 84% saw regression, stabilization, or no detectable cancer progression. Why isn’t this making national headlines? If these results are real, then we need...

47,117 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds

RXMEDS.STORE

16,612 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 #BREAKING: New PubMed peer reviewed study shows 84% of cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole disappeared, shrunk, or stopped spreading after several months 🔻 The Study and Important Caveats: Researchers followed 197 cancer patients who took a combination of ivermectin and mebendazole (off-label, through a telemedicine service). After 6 months, 122 of them filled out a follow-up survey. Among those 122 people: 84% said their cancer had either completely disappeared, shrunk, or stopped spreading. About 33% reported “no evidence of disease” About 16% reported the tumors got smaller About 36% said the cancer stayed the same (stable) 16% said it got worse Side effects were mostly mild (mainly stomach issues) and most people kept taking the medicine. 🔻 Important caveats: • The results come only from patient surveys — no doctors independently checked scans or medical records. • There was no control group to compare against. • Many patients were also getting regular cancer treatments (chemo, radiation, surgery, etc.) at the same time. • About 38% of the original group didn’t finish the survey. • The journal later issued an official “Expression of Concern” and started an audit because of questions about the data. • The authors say these findings are just a starting point and that proper clinical trials are still needed. 🔻What kinds of cancer were included? Most common Prostate: 55 patients (27.9%) Breast: 36 patients (18.3%) Lung: 17 patients (8.6%) Colon: 10 patients (5.1%) Liver: 5 patients (2.5%) Other cancers (74 patients / 37.6%) Urologic (bladder & kidney): 9 Pancreatic & bile duct: 6 Hematologic (lymphoma): 5 Head, neck & oral: 5 Gynecologic (ovarian & uterine): 5 Thyroid: 4 Brain & neurological: 3 Multiple myeloma: 3 Melanoma (skin & ocular): 3 Sarcoma: 2 Miscellaneous/unspecified: 29 🔻Final Note: The study does not show which cancers benefited the most. All the results (including the 84% figure) are reported only as overall numbers. Clip Study

MJTruthUltra

29,659 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. Dr. Sulack Pete "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases." Follow me for more Bombshell. #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure

Joe Tippens

46,807 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."

Sense Receptor

96,616 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Oncologist Dr. William Makis describes getting attacked by the president of City of Hope cancer centers for publishing success stories using antiparasitics to treat turbo cancers: "These antiparasitics are being heavily attacked and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, [and] fenbendazole. And I have hundreds of success stories...." This clip of Dr. Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from a panel discussion posted to the World Council for Health Rumble channel on November 24, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So these antiparasitics are being heavily attacked, and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, fenbendazole, and I have hundreds of success stories. I get attacked. I get attacked by mainstream doctors and mainstream oncologists. "And just going back to what Kevin McKernan said about this phenomenon of trying to retract papers, get good papers retracted, I've had this happen to me very recently. We published recently a paper on fenbendazole. Three cases of stage four cancer patients who had failed three or four or five lines of chemotherapy, and mainstream oncology regimens. These cancer patients were dying. They took fenbendazole and they became cancer free. And we followed them up, up to three years. They stayed cancer three for up to three years. So we had three cases. We published this paper a few months ago. This was only the second paper published on the antiparasitic fenbendazole in the past five years with human cases. The first one was published by Stanford University in 2021. And so they had published three cases in 2021. We published three cases in 2025. Within a month or two of the publication of our paper. Now it passed peer review and it was published. We were attacked by the editor of the paper, who's actually the president of the City of Hope cancer centers in the United States, in Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. "This was Dr. Maurice [Maurie] Markman, President of City of Hope, so a big time oncologist, with a lot of, you know, big pharma funding behind him. He said he's going to pull the paper. And they didn't have a good reason to pull the paper. In fact, the reason that they were putting was that I was giving, you know, medical advice to other cancer patients with fenbendazole. And so that was some kind of a conflict of interest. And because, you know, that wasn't declared in the way they liked, that they were going to pull the paper. "And so, you know, this is an attack. We're going to see these attacks not just on Kevin McKernan and David Speicher's work in trying to make the link between Covid vaccines and these turbo cancers. But even those of us who are going to try to treat these patients, and help these patients and try to get that work published with antiparasitics and these turbo cancers, we're being attacked, and our papers are being attacked for retraction as well." #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure

Joe Tippens

32,159 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer...[and is] running, quietly, several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer...So this is not fringe... There's... real science behind it, patents behind it." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "For the past year and a half, I've been working with antiparasitics that are being repurposed for cancer. This is ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole. And the reason is because there's a big body of research. There are over 400 published papers on ivermectin in cancer. There are over 240 published papers on mebendazole in cancer. "In fact, Johns Hopkins quietly secured a patent in 2021 on mebendazole for treatment in cancer, specifically the most aggressive cancer, which is glioblastoma, brain cancer, extremely aggressive cancer. Johns Hopkins has the patent. They are also running quietly several clinical trials with mebendazole in cancer. There's colon cancer, gastric cancer and brain cancer, including children, children with brain cancers as well. So this is not fringe, this is not, something that is far out. There's actually real science behind it, patents behind it. "And when you search a lot of the AIs, for example Perplexity AI and you ask what are the most promising repurposed drugs for terminally ill cancer patients today, it will give you in its search, in the top three, you will get ivermectin as number one, mebendazole and fenbendazole, there's other antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine will be in the top 10, you will have curcumin in the top 10, you will have EGCG, which is from green tea extract in the top 10, resveratrol in the top 10, metformin, which is a diabetes drug but also has anti-cancer activity in the top 10 as well. "And what I have found working with these antiparasitics, is that there is a benefit to patients in at least 75% of the cases."

Sense Receptor

228,469 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸DR PETER McCULLOUGH CALLS FOR MAJOR RANDOMISED TRIALS OF GENERIC DRUGS AGAINST CANCER This deserves serious scientific attention. Dr Peter McCullough is calling on the US National Cancer Institute and Britain's Medical Research Council to conduct large-scale clinical trials investigating a combination of generic medicines for solid-organ cancers. And he's not asking for a small observational study. He wants: Prospective. Double-blind. Randomised. Placebo-controlled trials. McCullough believes the existing evidence is sufficiently promising to justify putting the hypothesis through the highest level of clinical testing. That is precisely what should happen. If inexpensive, already-available medicines genuinely have significant anti-cancer effects, properly designed trials should be capable of demonstrating it. And if they don't, rigorous trials should establish that too. But McCullough raises another uncomfortable issue: Why isn't this receiving considerably more attention? He argues that pharmaceutical advertising exerts enormous influence over mainstream medical reporting — and questions whether that affects which potential treatments receive attention. Cancer affects millions of families around the world. If there is even a credible possibility that existing generic medicines could provide additional benefit, surely the answer isn't censorship or dismissal. RUN THE TRIALS. PUBLISH THE RESULTS. LET THE EVIDENCE DECIDE. McCullough Foundation Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® The Wellness Company

Jim Ferguson

13,916 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients The Clinical Benefit Ratio Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease / Total Patients (CBR) was 84.4% Overall, it is estimated that annual costs of standard chemotherapies average $111,000 per year. Background: Drug repurposing offers a pathway to identify accessible, low-toxicity cancer therapies. Ivermectin and mebendazole have demonstrated multi-target anti-cancer activity. This paper evaluates real-world patient-reported outcomes, safety, and adherence in a cohort of cancer patients utilizing this combination protocol. Methods: Prospective observational cohort of 197 cancer patients, who were prescribed ivermectin and mebendazole off-label through telemedicine (platform by licensed U.S. healthcare providers) Participants received compounded oral capsules containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole. Data were collected via voluntary, standardized digital surveys at baseline and at approximately 6-month follow-up. Of the initial cohort (N = 197), baseline characteristics, including cancer type and disease status, were assessed. A total of 122 participants completed the follow-up survey (61.9% response rate) Results: Mean age of 67 years, (52.3% male, 47.7% female). Cancer types included Prostate 27.9% Breast 18.3% Lung 8.6% Colon 5.1% Urologic 4.6% Pancreatic 3.0% Liver 2.5% Gynaecologic 2.5% Hematologic 2.5% Median duration since initial diagnosis, 1.2 years 37.1% experiencing active disease progression. 6-month follow-up Medication adherence, 86.9% Full initial 90-capsule ivermectin-mebendazole prescription. The Clinical Benefit Ratio Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease / Total Patients (CBR) was 84.4% Notably, 48.4% of cohort, strongest positive outcomes: Regression, 15.6% No current evidence of disease (NED), 32.8% Disease stability, 36.1% Disease progression, 15.6% No significant dose-response association was observed for cancer outcomes (p = 0.91), without a clear dose-response gradient for efficacy. Side effects Mild side effects (primarily gastrointestinal), 25.4% (93.6% of those affected continued treatment through minor dose adjustments) Concurrent conventional therapies Chemotherapy, 27.9% Radiation therapy, 21.3% Surgery, 19.7% Adjunctive interventions such as supplement use, 49.2% Dietary modification, 37.7% Conclusions: In this prospective real-world cohort, the combination of ivermectin and mebendazole was associated with high rates of self-reported clinical benefit, with nearly half of participants reporting tumours regression or no current evidence of disease across a heterogeneous population of cancer patients. These findings provide a compelling clinical signal that these well-tolerated, repurposed agents may offer therapeutic benefit. However, observational design, reliance on self-reported outcomes, and potential for selection bias and uncontrolled confounding, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Urgent prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials Validate these observations and further define optimal dosing strategies. Mechanism (pharmacodynamics) Ivermectin and mebendazole are antiparasitic agents, demonstrated highly promising anti-cancer activity. Ivermectin Shown to exert over 14 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across more than 12 cancer types, inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, mitochondrial function. Has demonstrated excellent safety in cancer patients (including those actively undergoing chemotherapy) Ivermectin and mebendazole selectively target cancer stem cells Mebendazole Microtubule disruption, leading to effective cell cycle arrest Potent induction of apoptosis Significant inhibition of tumour growth Inhibition of angiogenesis Disruption of glucose uptake When used together Target non-overlapping pathways, resulting in synergistic tumour regression, cancer stem cell depletion, and reversal of multidrug resistance in multiple in vitro and in vivo models Biodistribution, ivermectin and mebendazole document excellent tissue penetration

Dr. Zakaria MD

10,766 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸“WHY ISN’T THIS FRONT-PAGE NEWS?” — DR DIAZ ON CANCER These numbers stopped me in my tracks. During my conversation with Dr Diaz, he described results from a cancer treatment approach that he says included: 32.8% — NO EVIDENCE OF DISEASE and 15.6% — TUMOUR REGRESSION Not merely in early disease. We were discussing late-stage cancer as well. My immediate reaction was: Why aren't more doctors talking about this? Why isn't this front-page news? Dr Diaz's answer was extraordinary. “That is called indoctrination, Jim.” He argues that medical education teaches doctors to remain within established treatment frameworks — and that stepping outside accepted medical orthodoxy can carry serious professional consequences. That's a provocative accusation. And the cancer figures themselves need context: percentages alone cannot establish whether a treatment works without knowing the study design, patient population, controls, endpoints and statistical strength of the evidence. But if results of this magnitude are being reported, there is an obvious response: INVESTIGATE THEM. Run properly controlled clinical trials. Replicate the findings independently. Publish everything. Because cancer patients don't need hype. They don't need promising treatments suppressed either. THEY NEED THE TRUTH. And if an inexpensive or unconventional treatment really can produce meaningful tumour regression in advanced cancer... THE WORLD DESERVES TO KNOW. The Wellness Company Dr. Alejandro Díaz

Jim Ferguson

13,588 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen