Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

A Nihang at the CJP protest is saying - If we start attacking, we'll beat everyone until their bodies are covered in bruises. We won't spare anyone, whether it's the police or anyone else. This protest is being presented as a students' protest, so where did these Nihangs suddenly...

1,018,012 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"THIS IS NOWHERE NEAR THE RIGHT TO PROTEST": HARISH SALVE. ARW CJP SYMPATHISERS DEFENDING THE INDEFENSIBLE? Legal eagle Harish Salve tears into CJP, explaining why its Jantar Mantar protest crossed the line into unlawful conduct that, he argues, undermines the right to protest itself. Q: When does a protest cease to be protected democratic dissent and cross into unlawful conduct? Did that happen here? Harish Salve: "Yes. They have a right to protest. They can get together with placards. They can use social media. They can make speeches. They can demand a minister's resignation. They can call for non-cooperation. They can say, 'We'll do this, we'll do that.' That's all perfectly lawful. They may even say, 'We will march to Parliament.' But Parliament is a declared sensitive area, and we do not need to elaborate on why. We all know why it is a sensitive area. The police put up barricades. If you believe you are being unreasonably prevented, you ask the Police Commissioner for permission. If he says no, you go to a court of law and seek an order. The court will balance your right to protest against the security concerns raised by the police and decide whether the denial is justified. That's the rule of law. Once in a while, you may stage a token protest. You walk up to the barricade, place your hand on it, and allow yourself to be arrested. That's a recognised form of protest. What we saw, or rather what I have seen in videos and across various news channels, is nowhere near the right to protest. Jumping on police personnel, surrounding them, inflicting wounds and injuries on them, this is not a right to protest. Public order is the line that limits the right to protest. Even Article 19(2) makes it clear that public order is a constitutionally recognised ground on which the freedom of speech and expression may be restricted."

Rahul Shivshankar

44,828 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen