Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

A+ NQ setup has exactly three parts. 1. Statistical bias: Probability Map shows 75%+ to one side. Not an opinion. Backtested across 10 years of NQ session data. That number narrows the playing field before price moves an inch. 2. The sweep: Liquidity is resting in the opposite direction.... When price grabs it, that is not a fake-out. That is the fuel for the real move. You were expecting it. You were watching for it. 3. The entry model: After the sweep, the structure confirms. iFVG / CISD. A defined ICT concept with clear invalidation. Not a hope, not a gut feel. A model with a precise entry and a reason to be there. Probability tells you where. The sweep tells you when. The entry model tells you how. Remove any one of the three and you do not have an edge. You have a trade. How many of these boxes do you tick before you pull the trigger?show more

Herman Trading

9,803 subscribers

20,079 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This is what a textbook A+ setup on NQ looks like. The direction was already defined before the trade appeared. Today, the London Probability Map showed a 73.5% probability for the more probable LOW. So I was not interested in longs - SHORTS ONLY. I only needed one clean SHORT confirmation: • Sweep of liquidity • Bearish iFVG • Entry aligned with the statistically more probable direction That is it. Historical data and probabilities define the direction. Price action gives the entry. Trade entry + directional edge = A+ setup. The attached video shows the full London session execution step by step. How much simpler would your trading become if you stopped guessing the direction first?

This is what a textbook A+ setup on NQ looks like. The direction was already defined before the trade appeared. Today, the London Probability Map showed a 73.5% probability for the more probable LOW. So I was not interested in longs - SHORTS ONLY. I only needed one clean SHORT confirmation: • Sweep of liquidity • Bearish iFVG • Entry aligned with the statistically more probable direction That is it. Historical data and probabilities define the direction. Price action gives the entry. Trade entry + directional edge = A+ setup. The attached video shows the full London session execution step by step. How much simpler would your trading become if you stopped guessing the direction first?

Herman Trading

17,352 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Most traders still think the edge is the entry. It’s not. Today both probability models aligned with the same objective BEFORE price even got there. London Probability Map: 73.5% probability to sweep the LOW first. Price delivered exactly there. New York Probability Map: 72.8% probability to sweep the LOW first. Another textbook A+ setup. Another delivery. Trade entry in both cases? Basic ICT iFVG execution in the direction of the more probable side. That’s the part most traders miss. The iFVG is not the edge. The probabilities are. When you already know where price is statistically more likely to go first… execution becomes calmer, cleaner and far less emotional. Would your trading change if you started every session already knowing where the odds were leaning first? #NQ #ICT

Most traders still think the edge is the entry. It’s not. Today both probability models aligned with the same objective BEFORE price even got there. London Probability Map: 73.5% probability to sweep the LOW first. Price delivered exactly there. New York Probability Map: 72.8% probability to sweep the LOW first. Another textbook A+ setup. Another delivery. Trade entry in both cases? Basic ICT iFVG execution in the direction of the more probable side. That’s the part most traders miss. The iFVG is not the edge. The probabilities are. When you already know where price is statistically more likely to go first… execution becomes calmer, cleaner and far less emotional. Would your trading change if you started every session already knowing where the odds were leaning first? #NQ #ICT

Herman Trading

14,145 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Fraudulent liquidity sweeps are burning a hole in your wallet. Here's the mistake almost everyone makes: if you see a wick poke above a high and you call it a liquidity sweep... it's not. A REAL sweep needs a candle to actually CLOSE above that level. Not tag it. That close is your signal that a genuine stop run just happened. From there you don't just jump in. You wait for follow-through, and you want to see liquidity shift to the opposite direction. That's how you know real money got involved and it wasn't just retail stops getting tapped. The entry comes when price retraces back into a fair value gap. SL goes above the sweep, and the target is the next draw on liquidity. Full breakdown below 👇

Fraudulent liquidity sweeps are burning a hole in your wallet. Here's the mistake almost everyone makes: if you see a wick poke above a high and you call it a liquidity sweep... it's not. A REAL sweep needs a candle to actually CLOSE above that level. Not tag it. That close is your signal that a genuine stop run just happened. From there you don't just jump in. You wait for follow-through, and you want to see liquidity shift to the opposite direction. That's how you know real money got involved and it wasn't just retail stops getting tapped. The entry comes when price retraces back into a fair value gap. SL goes above the sweep, and the target is the next draw on liquidity. Full breakdown below 👇

PJ Trades

10,334 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

Herman Trading

22,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

Herman Trading

19,182 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

THE FIRST 15 MINUTES OF NEW YORK ARE NOT RANDOM. 🚨 Most traders treat the 9:30–9:45 window like noise on NQ and ES. They watch price move… they react… they guess. I don’t. I recorded a breakdown showing exactly how I use the Intelligent Balance Probability Map [Herman] during the 15-Minute Opening Range on NQ. Same basic ICT concept: → Opening Range → Sweep → iFVG Nothing new. But here’s the difference: I’m not looking for direction. I already have it. → Probabilities define the bias → Statistics frame the context → Price action becomes confirmation That changes everything. The same setup everyone sees… becomes high-conviction when you know the likely side before price moves. No guessing. No chasing. No forcing trades. Just: Wait → Confirm → Execute. That’s what trading with probabilities looks like. Do you trade the Opening Range blindly… or with a statistical edge behind it?

THE FIRST 15 MINUTES OF NEW YORK ARE NOT RANDOM. 🚨 Most traders treat the 9:30–9:45 window like noise on NQ and ES. They watch price move… they react… they guess. I don’t. I recorded a breakdown showing exactly how I use the Intelligent Balance Probability Map [Herman] during the 15-Minute Opening Range on NQ. Same basic ICT concept: → Opening Range → Sweep → iFVG Nothing new. But here’s the difference: I’m not looking for direction. I already have it. → Probabilities define the bias → Statistics frame the context → Price action becomes confirmation That changes everything. The same setup everyone sees… becomes high-conviction when you know the likely side before price moves. No guessing. No chasing. No forcing trades. Just: Wait → Confirm → Execute. That’s what trading with probabilities looks like. Do you trade the Opening Range blindly… or with a statistical edge behind it?

Herman Trading

36,895 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

you numbered the steps so it could not get lost it does not get lost that list was written for a model that wandered, and this one plans better than the list does, so every number you added is a place where it is no longer allowed, to be smarter than you state the goal, the constraints, and how you will know it worked keep the numbers only where exactly one sequence is safe, which is deletes, auth and compliance the procedure felt like rigour it is a cage built to the dimensions of a model that is not in the room

you numbered the steps so it could not get lost it does not get lost that list was written for a model that wandered, and this one plans better than the list does, so every number you added is a place where it is no longer allowed, to be smarter than you state the goal, the constraints, and how you will know it worked keep the numbers only where exactly one sequence is safe, which is deletes, auth and compliance the procedure felt like rigour it is a cage built to the dimensions of a model that is not in the room

Lagosaur

14,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

you rewrote a line in your claude.md this week to get the tone right there is a longer document sitting in front of it, and you have never opened it every tool you connected shipped a description, and a description is not a label, it is prose in second person addressed to the model i printed one this morning: two thousand seven hundred and eighty one characters, with a section headed when to use this tool it tells the model what to reach for, and when to stop and think first you spent an afternoon on your voice a package you installed with npx spent a page on its, and its page is read before yours you are not configuring an agent you are the second author on a document you have never read

you rewrote a line in your claude.md this week to get the tone right there is a longer document sitting in front of it, and you have never opened it every tool you connected shipped a description, and a description is not a label, it is prose in second person addressed to the model i printed one this morning: two thousand seven hundred and eighty one characters, with a section headed when to use this tool it tells the model what to reach for, and when to stop and think first you spent an afternoon on your voice a package you installed with npx spent a page on its, and its page is read before yours you are not configuring an agent you are the second author on a document you have never read

Lagosaur

10,012 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Why does price reverse the second you enter? Because you're reacting to micro structure shifts while institutions are still executing the macro trend. Every market operates in 2 ranges simultaneously: 1) External range (macro structure) 2) Internal range (micro structure) Every market is always operating within BOTH ranges simultaneously. 1) External Ranges How do you identify it? Look at the SIZE of the pullbacks. If one pullback is twice the size of the others—that's your external break of structure. What does it tell you? Your overall bias. If the external range is bearish, you should be looking for sells. If it's bullish, you should be looking for buys. The external range doesn't tell you when NOT to trade—it tells you WHAT DIRECTION to trade. 2) Internal Ranges How do you identify it? Look for small breaks of structure that happen WITHIN your external range. These are the tiny pullbacks that barely move price compared to the major swings. What does it tell you? Short-term trading opportunities. You CAN trade internal breaks, but manage your expectations. These aren't trend reversals—they're temporary counter-moves that create pullbacks before price continues with the external trend. The internal range tells you when there's a short-term trade setup, but NOT to expect a full reversal. In the video below, I've explained what happens when you trade internal breaks without identifying the external ranges (and how to solve this): — This is just one concept from my complete trading framework. We also cover how to identify when external structure is actually shifting, the 3 timeframes every trader needs to understand and how to identify discount zones for entry points. Just comment "RANGES" and the full breakdown will automatically be DM'd to you in the next few minutes.

Why does price reverse the second you enter? Because you're reacting to micro structure shifts while institutions are still executing the macro trend. Every market operates in 2 ranges simultaneously: 1) External range (macro structure) 2) Internal range (micro structure) Every market is always operating within BOTH ranges simultaneously. 1) External Ranges How do you identify it? Look at the SIZE of the pullbacks. If one pullback is twice the size of the others—that's your external break of structure. What does it tell you? Your overall bias. If the external range is bearish, you should be looking for sells. If it's bullish, you should be looking for buys. The external range doesn't tell you when NOT to trade—it tells you WHAT DIRECTION to trade. 2) Internal Ranges How do you identify it? Look for small breaks of structure that happen WITHIN your external range. These are the tiny pullbacks that barely move price compared to the major swings. What does it tell you? Short-term trading opportunities. You CAN trade internal breaks, but manage your expectations. These aren't trend reversals—they're temporary counter-moves that create pullbacks before price continues with the external trend. The internal range tells you when there's a short-term trade setup, but NOT to expect a full reversal. In the video below, I've explained what happens when you trade internal breaks without identifying the external ranges (and how to solve this): — This is just one concept from my complete trading framework. We also cover how to identify when external structure is actually shifting, the 3 timeframes every trader needs to understand and how to identify discount zones for entry points. Just comment "RANGES" and the full breakdown will automatically be DM'd to you in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

21,361 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

you were in the middle of something and it compacted, and you took that for the limit it was a default, and it is almost certainly not the number you think it is on a two hundred thousand window it fires near two hundred thousand, but on sonnet 5, the fable models and opus 4.7 and later it fires near nine hundred and sixty seven thousand, behind an llm gateway that same model is held down to two hundred thousand unless you pick the one million entry by hand so the moment your work gets summarized is decided by a model id string, and when that string is an alias the client does not recognise, it guesses autoCompactWindow in settings takes 150k and holds it CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_CONTEXT_TOKENS stops the guessing you did not hit a ceiling you accepted one

you were in the middle of something and it compacted, and you took that for the limit it was a default, and it is almost certainly not the number you think it is on a two hundred thousand window it fires near two hundred thousand, but on sonnet 5, the fable models and opus 4.7 and later it fires near nine hundred and sixty seven thousand, behind an llm gateway that same model is held down to two hundred thousand unless you pick the one million entry by hand so the moment your work gets summarized is decided by a model id string, and when that string is an alias the client does not recognise, it guesses autoCompactWindow in settings takes 150k and holds it CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_CONTEXT_TOKENS stops the guessing you did not hit a ceiling you accepted one

Lagosaur

11,671 просмотров • 23 дней назад

LIVE TRADE: NQ showed a 77% probability to sweep London’s High first today. Did we reach it? I don’t know. I already secured profits. Because most traders misunderstand what “more probable” actually means. A 77% probability does NOT mean: “Hold TP blindly until London High.” It means: my entire bias and trade direction is ONLY aligned with the statistically stronger side. That changes everything. I am not randomly longing and shorting inside noise. I am trading WITH the side that historically has the advantage. The target is optional. The directional edge is the real weapon. Would your trading improve if you stopped fighting the statistically stronger side? #NQ #ICT

LIVE TRADE: NQ showed a 77% probability to sweep London’s High first today. Did we reach it? I don’t know. I already secured profits. Because most traders misunderstand what “more probable” actually means. A 77% probability does NOT mean: “Hold TP blindly until London High.” It means: my entire bias and trade direction is ONLY aligned with the statistically stronger side. That changes everything. I am not randomly longing and shorting inside noise. I am trading WITH the side that historically has the advantage. The target is optional. The directional edge is the real weapon. Would your trading improve if you stopped fighting the statistically stronger side? #NQ #ICT

Herman Trading

14,813 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

CITADEL QUANTS HIDE THE GAME BEHIND A FORMULA WITH TEN TERMS, PREDICTION MARKETS RUN ON EXACTLY ONE The secret is one line. Edge = P(model) − P(market) That Z-field monster on screen is a stack of simple signals wearing a costume. A prediction market strips all of it down to one number, the crowd's guess at a probability. In plain words. If you can turn fresh news into a probability before the crowd reprices, the gap between your number and their price is the whole edge. That is why the game is not IQ, it is speed to a number. An AI that reads live news does in ninety seconds what the tab takes hours to price in. I broke down the four exact prompts that turn Grok into a probability desk, the sizing rules and the ten minute daily routine in the article. Still bets, not a salary, so size like it & the full playbook is in the article. Read it ↓

CITADEL QUANTS HIDE THE GAME BEHIND A FORMULA WITH TEN TERMS, PREDICTION MARKETS RUN ON EXACTLY ONE The secret is one line. Edge = P(model) − P(market) That Z-field monster on screen is a stack of simple signals wearing a costume. A prediction market strips all of it down to one number, the crowd's guess at a probability. In plain words. If you can turn fresh news into a probability before the crowd reprices, the gap between your number and their price is the whole edge. That is why the game is not IQ, it is speed to a number. An AI that reads live news does in ninety seconds what the tab takes hours to price in. I broke down the four exact prompts that turn Grok into a probability desk, the sizing rules and the ten minute daily routine in the article. Still bets, not a salary, so size like it & the full playbook is in the article. Read it ↓

slash1s

16,425 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Chris Camillo reveals the only way out for a regular person to build generational wealth. If you are a regular person with a regular job, the only crack you have at this is coming to terms with the fact that you can be a great investor. You can just do it on the side and have fun with it. You do not have to work with technicals. You do not need to be a pedigreed Wharton grad. You do not even have to understand finance at all, especially in the day of AI. All you have to do is figure out how to observe the world around you. You just connect the dots of change to companies that are either benefiting or being harmed by the change you see happening. Most of that seeing is simply watching videos on TikTok and reading comments. If that is not a fun way to make money, I do not know what is.

Chris Camillo reveals the only way out for a regular person to build generational wealth. If you are a regular person with a regular job, the only crack you have at this is coming to terms with the fact that you can be a great investor. You can just do it on the side and have fun with it. You do not have to work with technicals. You do not need to be a pedigreed Wharton grad. You do not even have to understand finance at all, especially in the day of AI. All you have to do is figure out how to observe the world around you. You just connect the dots of change to companies that are either benefiting or being harmed by the change you see happening. Most of that seeing is simply watching videos on TikTok and reading comments. If that is not a fun way to make money, I do not know what is.

Umar

116,212 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is how traders donate money to the market. They see 69% SHORTS… And still try to find a reason to go LONG. In this example from the New York session on $NQ, Intelligent Balance showed the more probable side clearly: SHORTS 69% That is your job. Not to predict every candle. Not to catch every reversal. Not to prove you are smarter than price. Your job is to trade only in the direction where probability is stacked in your favour. If the more probable side is below price, I am not interested in longs. I wait. Short entry. Short confirmation. Short execution. iFVG, CISD, sweep, displacement - pick your model. But never flip the direction just because price tries to bait you. The market’s favourite trick is making the less probable side look obvious. That is exactly how traders get trapped. Direction first. Confirmation second. Execution third. 69% SHORTS means one thing: I am either short… or I am not trading. Would you still try to catch longs here?

This is how traders donate money to the market. They see 69% SHORTS… And still try to find a reason to go LONG. In this example from the New York session on $NQ, Intelligent Balance showed the more probable side clearly: SHORTS 69% That is your job. Not to predict every candle. Not to catch every reversal. Not to prove you are smarter than price. Your job is to trade only in the direction where probability is stacked in your favour. If the more probable side is below price, I am not interested in longs. I wait. Short entry. Short confirmation. Short execution. iFVG, CISD, sweep, displacement - pick your model. But never flip the direction just because price tries to bait you. The market’s favourite trick is making the less probable side look obvious. That is exactly how traders get trapped. Direction first. Confirmation second. Execution third. 69% SHORTS means one thing: I am either short… or I am not trading. Would you still try to catch longs here?

Herman Trading

23,771 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

you told it something in the middle of a session, and an hour later it behaved like you never had you were not forgotten, you were never written down an instruction can live in three places and compaction treats them differently: the project root file is re-read from disk and put back, a nested one or a path scoped rule comes back only when the model next opens a file it applies to, and anything you only said out loud comes back never so the rule you typed most recently, in the moment it mattered most, is the one with the shortest life in the room you thought you were configuring it you were talking to it one of those survives the summary

you told it something in the middle of a session, and an hour later it behaved like you never had you were not forgotten, you were never written down an instruction can live in three places and compaction treats them differently: the project root file is re-read from disk and put back, a nested one or a path scoped rule comes back only when the model next opens a file it applies to, and anything you only said out loud comes back never so the rule you typed most recently, in the moment it mattered most, is the one with the shortest life in the room you thought you were configuring it you were talking to it one of those survives the summary

Lagosaur

10,263 просмотров • 25 дней назад

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."

CaughtOffside

39,058 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Chris Camillo explains his emergency trade investing strategy “As an investor, you should have 20 scenarios. Each of those scenarios maybe has a 5% likelihood of happening in your lifetime and you know exactly what you’re going to do if and when that scenario plays out” “The market is so inefficient when it comes to any low probability scenario” “When one of them happens, you want to be able to move in real time. The difference between moving in a matter of minutes and moving in a matter of hours might be the biggest trade of your entire life” “If you could move in minutes with high conviction, with leverage, when one of those low probability things actually starts to materialize, you will make the biggest trade of your life” “That’s the only trade you ever need to make to be a top 1% or even 1/10th of 1% investor” “You just need to mentally prepare because you will not pull the trigger on that trade unless you’ve been thinking about it for years” “If you’ve been thinking about it for years, you will pull that damn trigger so hard because you have been waiting for it to happen”

Chris Camillo explains his emergency trade investing strategy “As an investor, you should have 20 scenarios. Each of those scenarios maybe has a 5% likelihood of happening in your lifetime and you know exactly what you’re going to do if and when that scenario plays out” “The market is so inefficient when it comes to any low probability scenario” “When one of them happens, you want to be able to move in real time. The difference between moving in a matter of minutes and moving in a matter of hours might be the biggest trade of your entire life” “If you could move in minutes with high conviction, with leverage, when one of those low probability things actually starts to materialize, you will make the biggest trade of your life” “That’s the only trade you ever need to make to be a top 1% or even 1/10th of 1% investor” “You just need to mentally prepare because you will not pull the trigger on that trade unless you’ve been thinking about it for years” “If you’ve been thinking about it for years, you will pull that damn trigger so hard because you have been waiting for it to happen”

Jack

38,631 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I tested my Intelligent Balance Indicator during the slowest session of the day - ASIA. The result surprised me. You asked if it works during Asia as well as it does during New York. So I tested it. Even during slower sessions like Asia, the indicator can still identify the more probable direction of the price move with impressive accuracy. That is the edge. You do not need to predict every candle. You do not need to chase random moves. Let the indicator show you the more probable direction. Then use your favorite trade entry model towards that side. Same indicator. Different session. Same probability-driven approach. Watch the video and judge for yourself. Trade with probabilities. Not predictions. Should I test London next?

I tested my Intelligent Balance Indicator during the slowest session of the day - ASIA. The result surprised me. You asked if it works during Asia as well as it does during New York. So I tested it. Even during slower sessions like Asia, the indicator can still identify the more probable direction of the price move with impressive accuracy. That is the edge. You do not need to predict every candle. You do not need to chase random moves. Let the indicator show you the more probable direction. Then use your favorite trade entry model towards that side. Same indicator. Different session. Same probability-driven approach. Watch the video and judge for yourself. Trade with probabilities. Not predictions. Should I test London next?

Herman Trading

14,652 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

After 1,000+ trades, this is the only setup that consistently works in any market condition. It's called liquidity sweep reversal—and it's the highest probability trading strategy I know. Before I show you what it is, here are the two things most traders get wrong with it: 1) They enter too early and get stopped out on the second sweep. 2) They try to predict the LAST sweep with certainty This is a sure-fire way to burn your money. Here's what to do instead: Step 1: Identify market control Look at structure. Higher highs and higher lows? Buyers are in control. We're only trading from demand zones. Step 2: Mark your liquidity zones Find equal lows. When retail sees a "double bottom," they go long because textbooks tell them to. Their stop losses sit right below those lows. Available liquidity for institutions to sweep. Step 3: Wait for the sweep Price drops, sweeps those stops, liquidates retail traders, then creates a sharp V-shaped reaction. This sweep breaks structure. Zoom into 1-hour timeframe - price was making lower highs and lows. After the sweep? Higher highs and higher lows. That sweep zone becomes your institutional demand zone. Step 4: Enter on mitigation Wait for price to pull back to the liquidity zone. Enter there. Stop below the zone. Target 2-3R. Remember: You'll NEVER predict with 100% certainty when it's the LAST liquidity sweep. Sometimes price sweeps 2-3 times before the real move. But that's trading—we trade probabilities, not certainties. Also, keep in mind: If you can't spot the liquidity, you ARE the liquidity. — This is just a breakdown of one of the trading strategies we covered in our 2-hour long cryptocurrency trading course. I also discussed the trend pullback strategy, how to trade breakout retests without getting stopped out on fake moves, and why understanding liquidity is the only way to avoid becoming exit liquidity. Just comment "COURSE" and I'll DM it to you immediately so you can watch it.

After 1,000+ trades, this is the only setup that consistently works in any market condition. It's called liquidity sweep reversal—and it's the highest probability trading strategy I know. Before I show you what it is, here are the two things most traders get wrong with it: 1) They enter too early and get stopped out on the second sweep. 2) They try to predict the LAST sweep with certainty This is a sure-fire way to burn your money. Here's what to do instead: Step 1: Identify market control Look at structure. Higher highs and higher lows? Buyers are in control. We're only trading from demand zones. Step 2: Mark your liquidity zones Find equal lows. When retail sees a "double bottom," they go long because textbooks tell them to. Their stop losses sit right below those lows. Available liquidity for institutions to sweep. Step 3: Wait for the sweep Price drops, sweeps those stops, liquidates retail traders, then creates a sharp V-shaped reaction. This sweep breaks structure. Zoom into 1-hour timeframe - price was making lower highs and lows. After the sweep? Higher highs and higher lows. That sweep zone becomes your institutional demand zone. Step 4: Enter on mitigation Wait for price to pull back to the liquidity zone. Enter there. Stop below the zone. Target 2-3R. Remember: You'll NEVER predict with 100% certainty when it's the LAST liquidity sweep. Sometimes price sweeps 2-3 times before the real move. But that's trading—we trade probabilities, not certainties. Also, keep in mind: If you can't spot the liquidity, you ARE the liquidity. — This is just a breakdown of one of the trading strategies we covered in our 2-hour long cryptocurrency trading course. I also discussed the trend pullback strategy, how to trade breakout retests without getting stopped out on fake moves, and why understanding liquidity is the only way to avoid becoming exit liquidity. Just comment "COURSE" and I'll DM it to you immediately so you can watch it.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

54,339 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Sweep of an inducement low into a true open tells you when the time is right. TWO + GBT + ACSD $NQ Long 27th of February 2026

Sweep of an inducement low into a true open tells you when the time is right. TWO + GBT + ACSD $NQ Long 27th of February 2026

Brox

16,140 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад