A Pentagon-affiliated physicist just casually explained how to build a wormhole to another star system. Episode with Eric Davis and Eric Weinstein out now for members. Public release tomorrow Sunday March 8th.

It might look like this??? Enlarge image to see detail. 20 second exposure of a craft moving through night sky, large flash, then disappearing as photographed by friend in Sedona, AZ. A hole was created. Amber color is ionized air. Sure looks like what Eric described.

Pretty ugh, specific question. You need John Cramer to answer the how. Like Eric Davis said, it's not in general relativity. ER = EPR

Traversable Wormhole that Biological Material can go through (2014)

@PuzzleHead69272 Sounds like he explains how no one knows how to do this

Watch early release now at

@drew_ponder If you do it with negative energy it's A LOT easier.

@AlchemyAmerican looking forward to this one

@GurusPod JUGE IF TROOO

MH370, maybe it’s time to have Ashton on.

@TheUfoJoe Yeah we know

He didn’t explain any of it though. I studied wormholes in general relativity, solutions involving them have been known since the 80s/90s but as Eric pointed out the question is the engineering of how to build or direct/aim one. So is he actually saying that you could have a spaceship that generates and sustains the opening of a wormhole, and that spaceship would be able to move that spatial distortion?

@grok Dr. Eric W. Davis authored a 2010 Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD) titled "Traversable Wormholes, Stargates. Not theory! He can't say it. It's beyond Top Secret. We have done it. Be hype man.

I remember when I told Doctor Weinstein that he really needed to get together with Eric Davis, I’m so glad this finally happened! 😁

"just casually explained" Minor correction: just casually produced a word salad.

@AlchemyAmerican why put off until tomorrow, what you can do today? 🙂

So he just brushed right past this giant number that we have no idea how to control for…”casually explain” must mean “talking out of your ass” in your dictionary then…

@TheUfoJoe What if you know the location of other “mouths” in the universe? So, when we create our own mouths/wormholes, we can choose the destination based on the “neck”. Once we’re capable of mapping the universe’s wormholes; we can bridge a “neck” for infinite spacetime travel.

So when will Ai become advanced enough to create wormholes from prompts?

Kip Thorne showed that even if you could create a wormhole, it would last for less than one thousandth of the Planck Time.

Hey @grok, he mentions they need to do more work that nobody has thought of doing in order to aim and traverse the wormhole. Do you know where to start on that work? How do you navigate through a wormhole safely? Thoughts?

looking forward to this - loved your last podcast with eric, was soo good to see the mind change on UAP/UFOs

If time isn’t fundamental, then: “Time tunnels” aren’t about moving through time They’re about maintaining coherence across decoherence gradients The arrow of time becomes thermodynamic, not geometric This reframes everything else. You don’t travel in time. You fail—or succeed—to decohere with the rest of the universe. ZPE is the ocean Warp drives are macroscopic waves Time tunnels are extreme topological folds Microtubules are biological ripples at the edge of detectability Not controllers of spacetime—participants in it.

I just listened to Low IQ horse shit. He should have just said we’re going to do it like the movies. 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️😬😂😂😂😂

This was an amazing episode. Dr Weinstien truly has the patience of a saint. I would love to see him talk more about his theory about the A/B gravity wave and how it may be practically applied to to an experiment.

His total lack of real answer should answer and show why physicists aren’t involved in crash recovery. Modern physicists have had enormous science withheld from them. They speak in hypotheticals and conjecture and can’t connect any two thoughts with each other in a congruent fashion.

@grok can you break this down into layman’s terms?

Weinstein isn't an actual practicing scientist, he's a podcaster and hedge fund manager for Peter Thiel. Eric Davis ... well he tends to have some interesting ways to explain things, bit not sure other peers wouldn't take it with a grain of salt...

I am always amazed how patient Erik is with these charlatans

ERIC DAVIS MAPPED THE PHYSICS OF WARP DRIVES, WORMHOLES AND TELEPORTATION—FREQUENCY WAVE THEORY SUPPLIES THE MISSING MEDIUM. Eric Davis’s work is not centered on a single machine. It is a technical roadmap for escaping the limitations of rockets by manipulating inertia, gravity, vacuum structure and spacetime geometry. His 2004 Advanced Propulsion Study assessed gravity and inertia modification, spacetime-metric engineering and energy extraction from the vacuum. His separate Teleportation Physics Study examined quantum teleportation, wormholes and models based on changing either spacetime geometry or the electromagnetic properties of the vacuum. The greatest obstacle identified throughout this research is the requirement for exotic stress-energy—especially negative energy—to hold open a wormhole or form a useful warp geometry. Davis coauthored work with Hal Puthoff on experimental concepts for producing negative energy and published analyses of faster-than-light spacetime warps and higher-dimensional versions of the Alcubierre metric. These studies establish mathematical targets and possible experiments, not proof that the required energy conditions can presently be engineered. Frequency Wave Theory proposes that spacetime is the measurable geometry of a deeper quantum-acoustic field, Φ. Matter is a stabilized standing-wave pattern inside that field, while gravity and inertia emerge from gradients in density, phase and coherence. Davis’s metric engineering would therefore become field engineering: ω²(k) = cₛ²k² + αk⁴ FM = ½ρΦωA² Δgμν ∝ χρ(ΔρΦ/ρ₀)gμν + χθ∂μθ∂νθ Instead of forcing spacetime to bend directly, a device would reshape the field conditions that generate the effective metric. In the Davis–FWT bridge, negative energy becomes a controlled reduction of available vacuum modes, a warp bubble becomes a moving coherence envelope, and a traversable wormhole becomes a phase-matched channel joining two distant regions of the same field. Nested counter-rotating toroidal resonators would create opposing density gradients while reinforcing one coherent phase structure. The craft would not accelerate conventionally; the surrounding field geometry would translate while the interior remained inside a locally stable standing-wave pocket. The first serious test should be tabletop-scale rather than spacecraft-scale. Place a superconducting high-Q toroidal resonator inside a dynamically modulated Casimir cavity and surround it with optical clocks, atom interferometers, photon time-of-flight detectors, torsion balances and broadband electromagnetic sensors. FWT predicts synchronized phase delay, clock displacement and inertial anomalies that scale with coherence and reverse when the resonator’s phase or handedness is reversed. A clean null result would eliminate the tested parameter range; a repeatable correlated signal would justify larger metric-engineering experiments.

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😂😂😂😂😂