Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them. Space is fake. The stars & planets you see in the sky are light frequencies inside the firmament, which have been rotating in perfect circles around the North Star for all of time.

16,160 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля 𝗦𝗟𝗬 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗘
𝗦𝗟𝗬 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗘3 месяцев назад

"A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them." I notice you didnt put any numbers to your claim.. wonder why that is.. Gaslight much?

Фото профиля Bob Marshall
Bob Marshall3 месяцев назад

Have you ever driven over a high mountain pass? Did your ears pop? Do you know why your ears popped? Pressure difference as you climb in altitude is measurable and predictable. The higher you go the lower it is. It does this without a push of wind from higher pressure to lower pressure. This is because the pressure is created by gravity. There is no other container. There needs to be no other container. At least pick a BS topic that is a little harder to demonstrate how wrong you are.

Фото профиля Sapient Hominid
Sapient Hominid3 месяцев назад

Except the planets don't rotate around in perfect circles, and nobody in the history of the world has claimed a pressurized atmosphere exists next to a vacuum.

Фото профиля By Grabthar's Hammer
By Grabthar's Hammer3 месяцев назад

Ben says: “A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them.” Then why does YOUR OWN MODEL say that’s exactly what’s happening inside your dome? Earth’s atmosphere is a vacuum at 60 miles of altitude. It doesn’t touch a dome.

Фото профиля Conspiracy Truther
Conspiracy Truther3 месяцев назад

Holy shit this is a retarded post. The saddest part is no one will ever be able to debunk flat earth when the flat earthers get to decide what's evidence and what isn't.

Фото профиля Scotus Maximus
Scotus Maximus3 месяцев назад

All you’re doing here is demonstrating that you either failed or never took physics. Making up fake laws of physics doesn’t change reality.

Фото профиля Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎
Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎3 месяцев назад

So totally wrong, are you intentionally making a fool of yourself? Have you ever climbed a mountain and noticed that once you got past 2 km high you were having a hard time breathing? I'd love to receive an answer, but we both know you won't.

Фото профиля Frank Black
Frank Black3 месяцев назад

Gravity is a theory. I find it interesting when people say “you don’t know how gravity works” well nobody does . It’s never even been proven.

Фото профиля Grodd
Grodd3 месяцев назад

Gravity.

Фото профиля Wolverine 𐤊
Wolverine 𐤊3 месяцев назад

Yes it can Ben. You just don’t understand physics. How many times are you going to show the world you are a stupid person mate? Do you even realise this is what you are doing?

Фото профиля LfB
LfB3 месяцев назад

It’s hilarious when Bible thumpers constantly keep posting the dumbest shit on here. The stereotype isn’t going anywhere anytime soon 🤣

Фото профиля Brett
Brett3 месяцев назад

You are an idiot who only watches FE YouTube videos. Go learn physics and stop embarrassing yourself

Фото профиля Justin ⭐️r
Justin ⭐️r3 месяцев назад

Lots of people dunking on you for your incorrect reason for why planets are fake. But I want to also add: The North Star (I’m assuming you’re referring to Polaris) isn’t always The North Star. It changes in a 14k year cycle. And there’s historical documents to support this.

Фото профиля Anoo₿us
Anoo₿us3 месяцев назад

There is a barrier, and it’s nuclear/electromagnetic And don’t worry I’ve done all the math with zero free parameters

Фото профиля JustSayin
JustSayin3 месяцев назад

Dude. How bad is people’s ADHD that someone feels the need to make informative videos look like this??

Фото профиля Giovanni_Sagredo
Giovanni_Sagredo3 месяцев назад

You can literally see four planets with gaseous atmospheres in a $200 telescope, meme-gobbling retard.

Фото профиля Dan
Dan3 месяцев назад

That's ignorance You need to learn what gravity is and what it does Go swimming and then go under the water deep enough can you survive no but there's no container so there's no pressure right 😏 It's the ocean no lid different gases have different weights and is pulled different

Фото профиля Johnny Ragadoo
Johnny Ragadoo3 месяцев назад

Please define a light frequency in a firmament. I’m not quite following you on that one.

Фото профиля Ghostbanned Ӿ 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇦
Ghostbanned Ӿ 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇦3 месяцев назад

> "A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them." The Joint European Torus (JET) Project compresses gas IN A VACUUM so incredibly powerfully that it 100%-overcomes Coulomb repulsion - to create NUCLEAR FUSION!

Фото профиля Darnell H
Darnell H3 месяцев назад

Soooo, that would explain why Earth has an atmospheric gradient, yes? You’re just proving Earth isn’t flat with some dome covering it. If it were, the atmosphere would be equally distributed regardless of altitude. The grift is over. 🤷🏾‍♂️

Фото профиля United-States 🇺🇸
United-States 🇺🇸3 месяцев назад

Gravity keeps the pressure in using many layers/levels of atmosphere. From the thickest where water is, and the thinnest layer next to space itself. Science lol

Фото профиля Biccys
Biccys3 месяцев назад

If what you're saying is true, (it isn't btw) then why is there a pressure gradient at all? Like, AT ALL. If you're suggesting we're under a dome, why isn't the pressure exactly the same EVERYWHERE? That's what you're suggesting should be the case. Idiot

Фото профиля The Grim Scalper
The Grim Scalper3 месяцев назад

There is a barrier. It’s called gravity you fucking idiot.

Фото профиля Dan Latarche
Dan Latarche3 месяцев назад

Pressure gradients, proven scientific principle, Explains this dumbass flerfer talking point, Look it up if you dont want to get taken in by these internet grifters 👍

Фото профиля William G. Michael’s
William G. Michael’s3 месяцев назад

Here’s a problem you run up against with this logic. The moon exists inside the firmament, therefore it is surrounded by the atmosphere which means you could land a plane or helicopter on it. Flat Earth is so ridiculous not one person who believes in it has ever tried.

Фото профиля RooFootNol
RooFootNol3 месяцев назад

Why do you keep repeating this claim about Polaris when history says the complete opposite?

Фото профиля Claymore729
Claymore7293 месяцев назад

A pressurized atmosphere CAN exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier. We see this in the case of the Earth, because gravity keeps the atmosphere against the Earth. Space is very real, and the stars and planets are real entities.

Фото профиля Chuckin McMusksux
Chuckin McMusksux3 месяцев назад

Christ why do you have to be so fucking retarded whyyyyyy

Фото профиля Real Pinochet
Real Pinochet3 месяцев назад

Lay off the DMT.

Фото профиля Joe Heinemann
Joe Heinemann3 месяцев назад

It's not too late to start learning something.

Фото профиля Andiders
Andiders3 месяцев назад

How do they also rotate around the southern cross?

Фото профиля MysticSoul
MysticSoul3 месяцев назад

💯💯💯 Lots of NPCs in the comments 😂

Фото профиля daiˈɒdgɪniːz
daiˈɒdgɪniːz3 месяцев назад

Gravity has entered the chat ...

Похожие видео

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth

Ben Wehrman

12,019 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад