正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them. Space is fake. The stars & planets you see in the sky are light frequencies inside the firmament, which have been rotating in perfect circles around the North Star for all of time.

16,160 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

𝗦𝗟𝗬 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗘 的头像
𝗦𝗟𝗬 𝗦𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗘3 个月前

"A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them." I notice you didnt put any numbers to your claim.. wonder why that is.. Gaslight much?

Bob Marshall 的头像
Bob Marshall3 个月前

Have you ever driven over a high mountain pass? Did your ears pop? Do you know why your ears popped? Pressure difference as you climb in altitude is measurable and predictable. The higher you go the lower it is. It does this without a push of wind from higher pressure to lower pressure. This is because the pressure is created by gravity. There is no other container. There needs to be no other container. At least pick a BS topic that is a little harder to demonstrate how wrong you are.

Sapient Hominid 的头像
Sapient Hominid3 个月前

Except the planets don't rotate around in perfect circles, and nobody in the history of the world has claimed a pressurized atmosphere exists next to a vacuum.

By Grabthar's Hammer 的头像
By Grabthar's Hammer3 个月前

Ben says: “A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them.” Then why does YOUR OWN MODEL say that’s exactly what’s happening inside your dome? Earth’s atmosphere is a vacuum at 60 miles of altitude. It doesn’t touch a dome.

Conspiracy Truther 的头像
Conspiracy Truther3 个月前

Holy shit this is a retarded post. The saddest part is no one will ever be able to debunk flat earth when the flat earthers get to decide what's evidence and what isn't.

Scotus Maximus 的头像
Scotus Maximus3 个月前

All you’re doing here is demonstrating that you either failed or never took physics. Making up fake laws of physics doesn’t change reality.

Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎 的头像
Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎3 个月前

So totally wrong, are you intentionally making a fool of yourself? Have you ever climbed a mountain and noticed that once you got past 2 km high you were having a hard time breathing? I'd love to receive an answer, but we both know you won't.

Frank Black 的头像
Frank Black3 个月前

Gravity is a theory. I find it interesting when people say “you don’t know how gravity works” well nobody does . It’s never even been proven.

Grodd 的头像
Grodd3 个月前

Gravity.

Wolverine 𐤊 的头像
Wolverine 𐤊3 个月前

Yes it can Ben. You just don’t understand physics. How many times are you going to show the world you are a stupid person mate? Do you even realise this is what you are doing?

LfB 的头像
LfB3 个月前

It’s hilarious when Bible thumpers constantly keep posting the dumbest shit on here. The stereotype isn’t going anywhere anytime soon 🤣

Brett 的头像
Brett3 个月前

You are an idiot who only watches FE YouTube videos. Go learn physics and stop embarrassing yourself

Justin ⭐️r 的头像
Justin ⭐️r3 个月前

Lots of people dunking on you for your incorrect reason for why planets are fake. But I want to also add: The North Star (I’m assuming you’re referring to Polaris) isn’t always The North Star. It changes in a 14k year cycle. And there’s historical documents to support this.

Anoo₿us 的头像
Anoo₿us3 个月前

There is a barrier, and it’s nuclear/electromagnetic And don’t worry I’ve done all the math with zero free parameters

JustSayin 的头像
JustSayin3 个月前

Dude. How bad is people’s ADHD that someone feels the need to make informative videos look like this??

Giovanni_Sagredo 的头像
Giovanni_Sagredo3 个月前

You can literally see four planets with gaseous atmospheres in a $200 telescope, meme-gobbling retard.

Dan 的头像
Dan3 个月前

That's ignorance You need to learn what gravity is and what it does Go swimming and then go under the water deep enough can you survive no but there's no container so there's no pressure right 😏 It's the ocean no lid different gases have different weights and is pulled different

Johnny Ragadoo 的头像
Johnny Ragadoo3 个月前

Please define a light frequency in a firmament. I’m not quite following you on that one.

Ghostbanned Ӿ 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇦 的头像
Ghostbanned Ӿ 🇬🇧🤝🇺🇦3 个月前

> "A pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier separating them." The Joint European Torus (JET) Project compresses gas IN A VACUUM so incredibly powerfully that it 100%-overcomes Coulomb repulsion - to create NUCLEAR FUSION!

Darnell H 的头像
Darnell H3 个月前

Soooo, that would explain why Earth has an atmospheric gradient, yes? You’re just proving Earth isn’t flat with some dome covering it. If it were, the atmosphere would be equally distributed regardless of altitude. The grift is over. 🤷🏾‍♂️

United-States 🇺🇸 的头像
United-States 🇺🇸3 个月前

Gravity keeps the pressure in using many layers/levels of atmosphere. From the thickest where water is, and the thinnest layer next to space itself. Science lol

Biccys 的头像
Biccys3 个月前

If what you're saying is true, (it isn't btw) then why is there a pressure gradient at all? Like, AT ALL. If you're suggesting we're under a dome, why isn't the pressure exactly the same EVERYWHERE? That's what you're suggesting should be the case. Idiot

The Grim Scalper 的头像
The Grim Scalper3 个月前

There is a barrier. It’s called gravity you fucking idiot.

Dan Latarche 的头像
Dan Latarche3 个月前

Pressure gradients, proven scientific principle, Explains this dumbass flerfer talking point, Look it up if you dont want to get taken in by these internet grifters 👍

William G. Michael’s 的头像
William G. Michael’s3 个月前

Here’s a problem you run up against with this logic. The moon exists inside the firmament, therefore it is surrounded by the atmosphere which means you could land a plane or helicopter on it. Flat Earth is so ridiculous not one person who believes in it has ever tried.

RooFootNol 的头像
RooFootNol3 个月前

Why do you keep repeating this claim about Polaris when history says the complete opposite?

Claymore729 的头像
Claymore7293 个月前

A pressurized atmosphere CAN exist next to a vacuum without a physical barrier. We see this in the case of the Earth, because gravity keeps the atmosphere against the Earth. Space is very real, and the stars and planets are real entities.

Chuckin McMusksux 的头像
Chuckin McMusksux3 个月前

Christ why do you have to be so fucking retarded whyyyyyy

Real Pinochet 的头像
Real Pinochet3 个月前

Lay off the DMT.

Joe Heinemann 的头像
Joe Heinemann3 个月前

It's not too late to start learning something.

Andiders 的头像
Andiders3 个月前

How do they also rotate around the southern cross?

MysticSoul 的头像
MysticSoul3 个月前

💯💯💯 Lots of NPCs in the comments 😂

daiˈɒdgɪniːz 的头像
daiˈɒdgɪniːz3 个月前

Gravity has entered the chat ...

相关视频

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth

Ben Wehrman

12,019 次观看 • 6 个月前