正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

A pro-Palestinian protest by two Microsoft employees, Ibtihal Aboussad and Vaniya Agrawal interrupted the company’s 50th anniversary celebration that included Bill Gates. Aboussad shouted: “Shame on you. You claim that you care about using AI for good but Microsoft sells AI weapons to the Israeli military." Both employees have...

304,024 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Shiv-Thrinethra 的头像
Shiv-Thrinethra1 年前

What drives such Agarwal, Varma, Iyer, Acharya, and Bhattacharya's to support jihadists, is a mystery!! Is it fame, money or brainwashed!!

Audacious 的头像
Audacious1 年前

Vaniyaa Agrawal likely married a jihadi. Before the fall of a woman, comes a jihadi who converts her.

RIFLE-COMPANY⭕️ 的头像
RIFLE-COMPANY⭕️1 年前

This Vaniya Agarwal is enough for the internet to sh*t on Hindus! What a frickin’ idiot! 🤦🏻‍♂️

Anna 的头像
Anna1 年前

Hindus specifically, must stay away from leaning towards anyone in a ongoing conflict. Especially if you’re not residing in ur own country. Always follow the stance taken by the govt. Except Indian origin religions, none of the rest have revered sanatan. Know the history.

Coral AI News 的头像
Coral AI News2 年前

Coral AI is the most powerful AI for documents. See the difference yourself:

👩🏻Banisha 🕉️ Hindu 的头像
👩🏻Banisha 🕉️ Hindu1 年前

Hindu parents just push their kids into d most pricy schools with d most foreign syllabus & cheer them along as they become more & more deracinated They never sit them down & talk about historical or ongoing persecution & conversion by lsIamists & Christians

Gems of BJP 的头像
Gems of BJP1 年前

These are the leftists with Hindu names who supported Waqf recently. More dangerous than Islamists.

Dev Bharat 的头像
Dev Bharat1 年前

The Indian government should immediately open an office for those who want to fight for Palestine. There are enough people in India who want to sacrifice their lives for Palestine, send them to Gaza with full respect so that they can help Gaza in its fight against Israel.

Hey Ram! 🇮🇳 🇺🇲 的头像
Hey Ram! 🇮🇳 🇺🇲1 年前

Hindus are the biggest enemies of Hindus.

Balaraj Ar 🚩 的头像
Balaraj Ar 🚩1 年前

@StopAntisemites two more Ibtihal Aboussad and Vaniya Agrawal

BadBM 的头像
BadBM1 年前

Deport these filths in the desert.

相关视频

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 次观看 • 2 个月前

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

Glow Lee

92,179 次观看 • 7 个月前