Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A QUICK TECH FIX TO BYPASS THE TEDIOUS MANUAL SEARCH IN SIR DRAFT ROLL–2026 Tired of manually scanning ~1,000 names in the SIR Draft Roll–2026 just to check whether your name exists? Here’s a simple workaround. 🔹 Download the PDF of the SIR–2026 Draft Roll for your Polling Station...

31,201 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

VIDEO | Delhi: TMC MP Sagarika Ghosh on 23 political parties along with an Independent MP sending a joint letter to Chief Justice Surya Kant on the SIR process, the role of the Election Commission and other election-related issues, says, "There is complete unity in the non-NDA opposition. Complete unity on the manner in which the BJP is manipulating electoral rolls through the SIR exercise, manipulating the voting process through the SIR exercise, manipulating uh elections through the SIR exercise and hijacking democracy. The BJP is hijacking democracy through the SIR exercise. There is complete unity in the non-NDA opposition on this issue. In an unprecedented move, this has never happened before, 23 opposition parties have written to the Chief Justice of India, have written a joint letter, in which the DMK and the Aam Aadmi Party have also signed that letter appealing to the judiciary on this manipulation of the electoral process and the manner in which the BJP is misusing the SIR with the Election Commission as its 12th man, misusing the SIR, snatching away the right to vote from lakhs of people. Lakhs of people have been disenfranchised in the Bengal election. Lakhs of people have lost their right to vote. So, we have for the first time opposition parties have written to the Chief Justice of India. We have sent letter today, appealing to the judiciary, appealing to the judicial conscience that please consider this manipulation, this gross violation of the right to vote of every citizen of India, which the BJP is doing in order to benefit politically." #TMC #ElectionCommission #SIR (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

11,382 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Two things we have objected to as preliminary issues: 1. The requirement that only the head or chairperson or president of the political parties could attend. 2. The rather pedantic insistence on two persons per party has no legal basis or sanction, which is most unfortunate. We have requested them to work out a system to ensure it doesn't recur. On the merits, we raised several issues: 👉 Firstly, we questioned the timing of the revision, given that the last revision was in 2003. For 22 years and over 4-5 elections: were all those elections completely unreliable and imperfect? 👉 Secondly, the Special Revision of Electoral Rolls (SIR) held in 2003 took place a year before the national Lok Sabha elections of 2004 and 24 months before the assembly elections. In contrast, the current electoral revision exercise for Bihar is being conducted with a maximum period of only 1-2 months. 👉 Thirdly, this disenfranchisement is the worst attack on the basic structure of the Constitution. You have abandoned the documentation process that has been in use for decades, such as Aadhaar cards or ration cards. Unless one is already in the electoral roll of 2003, all other names require a birth certificate, and in one category, the birth certificates of both parents are needed. How do you expect the backward, flood-affected, poor, and migrant populations to run from pillar to post to obtain birth certificates for themselves or their parents? If a person fails to obtain the certificate within the time limit, they risk losing their place on the electoral roll. They had an SSR, which is a summary revision, in October 2024. You give statements about educating voters and political parties, and having training camps for BLOs and for electoral officers. They said so in the published Election Commission statements of January, April and May, and finally, in the middle of June, gave a statement for conducting SIR. Our question is: why didn't you mention it before? The Election Commission, although they heard us, seemed completely disinclined to accept our submissions. : Member of Empowered Action Group of Leaders and Experts (EAGLE) Shri Abhishek Singhvi 📍 Delhi

Congress

10,563 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BJP has perfected the dirty art of voter roll tampering. They did the warm-up in Delhi and Maharashtra. Now they are playing the real match in Bengal. In Maharashtra, 43,84,814 voters were added in 5 years, and another 40,81,229 were added in just 5 months. In Delhi: 4,16,648 voters were added in 4 years, and another 3,99,362 were added in just 7 months. I had warned then that the real rigging is not in EVMs, it’s in the electoral rolls. Bengal is now witnessing exactly that. This video clearly shows cartons filled with fraudulent Form 6 applications being openly submitted at the Chief Electoral Officer’s office, and stacked on the third floor raising serious concerns about an attempt to illegally bring in voters from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh into Bengal’s electoral rolls. And it is shocking how the Election Commission of India has rolled over and allowed this conspiracy. Nowhere in the Election Commission’s rules is bulk submission of Form 6 permitted. The limit is clearly capped at 50 applications per individual. Yet here, thousands of forms are being submitted by just a handful of people- something that is not only a blatant violation of the rules but also strikes at the very foundation of a free and fair electoral process. We call ourselves the world’s largest democracy, yet the very custodian of our democratic rights is actively facilitating its sabotage. When BJP shouted “Paltano Dorkar”, they actually meant “VOTER ROLLS PALTANO DORKAR”. When they screamed “Poriborton”, they meant a DEMOGRAPHIC PORIBORTON, replacing Bengal’s own electorate with voters brought in from BJP-ruled states.

Abhishek Banerjee

422,674 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce