Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

A QUICK TECH FIX TO BYPASS THE TEDIOUS MANUAL SEARCH IN SIR DRAFT ROLL–2026 Tired of manually scanning ~1,000 names in the SIR Draft Roll–2026 just to check whether your name exists? Here’s a simple workaround. 🔹 Download the PDF of the SIR–2026 Draft Roll for your Polling Station...

31,201 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

.Election Commission of India Chief Electoral Officer, Andhra Pradesh This video exposes exactly what YSRCP has been warning about repeatedly. In the name of the SIR process, official Enumeration Forms collected from voters have reached the hands of the TDP/MyTDP team in Atmakur constituency. Private persons are sitting inside the Secretariat and openly entering voter details into the MyTDP App. When questioned, they reportedly say they came because Anam sent them. How did confidential SIR forms, collected as part of an Election Commission process, reach the hands of TDP-linked private persons? YSRCP has already submitted multiple complaints to the Election Commission regarding the illegal use of the MyTDP App in the SIR process, political interference by TDP leaders, pressure on BLOs, and misuse of official election machinery. But till now, no serious enquiry or visible action has been taken. This inaction is emboldening the ruling TDP. They are misusing power, officials and government premises to divert voter data into their party app and target votes opposed to them. This is not a mere local irregularity. This is a direct attack on the neutrality of the electoral roll revision process. The SIR process is supposed to be under the exclusive control of the Election Commission. It cannot be converted into a TDP data collection drive. It cannot be allowed to become a tool to identify, target and delete the votes of YSRCP leaders, cadres, supporters, sympathisers and voters opposed to the ruling party. We demand immediate action: 1.Seize all SIR forms handled by private/TDP-linked persons in this incident. 2.Conduct an urgent enquiry into how official Enumeration Forms reached the MyTDP team. 3.Identify and suspend officials who allowed private persons to handle SIR forms. 4.Ban the use of MyTDP App or any party-linked app in the SIR process. 5.Order a statewide probe into all complaints filed by YSRCP on MyTDP App misuse. 6.Ensure that every genuine voter’s right is protected and no vote is deleted through political manipulation. The Election Commission must act now. Silence will only encourage further misuse. The integrity of the electoral roll and the voting rights of people in Andhra Pradesh are at stake.

YSR Congress Party

31,708 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BJP has perfected the dirty art of voter roll tampering. They did the warm-up in Delhi and Maharashtra. Now they are playing the real match in Bengal. In Maharashtra, 43,84,814 voters were added in 5 years, and another 40,81,229 were added in just 5 months. In Delhi: 4,16,648 voters were added in 4 years, and another 3,99,362 were added in just 7 months. I had warned then that the real rigging is not in EVMs, it’s in the electoral rolls. Bengal is now witnessing exactly that. This video clearly shows cartons filled with fraudulent Form 6 applications being openly submitted at the Chief Electoral Officer’s office, and stacked on the third floor raising serious concerns about an attempt to illegally bring in voters from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh into Bengal’s electoral rolls. And it is shocking how the Election Commission of India has rolled over and allowed this conspiracy. Nowhere in the Election Commission’s rules is bulk submission of Form 6 permitted. The limit is clearly capped at 50 applications per individual. Yet here, thousands of forms are being submitted by just a handful of people- something that is not only a blatant violation of the rules but also strikes at the very foundation of a free and fair electoral process. We call ourselves the world’s largest democracy, yet the very custodian of our democratic rights is actively facilitating its sabotage. When BJP shouted “Paltano Dorkar”, they actually meant “VOTER ROLLS PALTANO DORKAR”. When they screamed “Poriborton”, they meant a DEMOGRAPHIC PORIBORTON, replacing Bengal’s own electorate with voters brought in from BJP-ruled states.

Abhishek Banerjee

423,836 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Nadia is a sensitive border district facing massive infiltration and one of the highest incidences of human trafficking. The integrity of the electoral process in such a district is of utmost importance. We have specific information that, in Nadia district, there has been a gross violation of the SIR proceedings. The DEO, Mr. Anish Dasgupta (IAS), along with the ADM (LR), Mr. Nripendra Singh (IAS), were present in Nakashipara Block around 7:00 PM on 20-02-2026. They directed the ERO and AERO to manipulate the SIR process by enlisting a large number of voters despite logical discrepancies and questionable documentation. During the meeting, it was instructed that the concerned officials switch off their mobile phones. There are apprehensions that similar actions may have been carried out in other blocks under the district administration. This matter requires an immediate and impartial probe, and Election Commission of India must take the necessary corrective steps. The larger question is: why is the Mamata Banerjee administration allegedly interfering in the SIR process? Why is there an attempt to shield fake or illegal voters? This does not appear to be an isolated instance, as similar reports have surfaced from several districts. Most recently, there are concerns that District Magistrates may be attempting to mislead judicial officers appointed at the district level. Evidence in this regard is reportedly in the public domain. Free and fair electoral processes are the cornerstone of democracy. Any attempt to undermine them must be thoroughly investigated.

Amit Malviya

11,973 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Delhi: Co-convenor, Cockroach Janta Party, Saurav Das says, "The second thing that is happening-look at Bengal. There is a very significant and serious observation regarding Bengal in these files. In Bengal, 60 lakh people were identified as having logical discrepancies. This means that there was some issue with their details, such as their names not matching or it not being clear whether their parents were included in the previous SIR. Out of those 60 lakh people, 33 lakh were subsequently added. But when those 33 lakh voters were added following the Supreme Court’s order, the Election Commission of India challenged the addition in court in a matter involving lakhs of voters. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi asked in the files: These appeals are being filed against voters in such large numbers-who authorised them? It is being done in the name of the Election Commission of India, but who is authorising it? You need to understand that the Election Commission is not the sole responsibility of one person. There are three Election Commissioners, and the Commission functions either by consensus or by majority vote. The two other Election Commissioners clearly called this illegal, but even then, the Election Commission of India, under the direction of Gyanesh Kumar-and whoever is directing or controlling him-has continued carrying out these illegal actions for months. It has been going on for a long time, for nearly one and a half years, since the SIR began..."

IANS

203,837 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

14,913 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Gyanesh Kumar was selected by a three-member committee of Modi, Amit Shah and Rahul Gandhi; Gandhi recorded a dissent , isn't It a Joke ??? 😑💥 Protest to save our democracy ✊ Protect our Elections from VoteChori 🙆 Fight for Independent Institutions 👩‍⚖️ 📜 'CEC and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023' along with establishing a 3 person committee out of which 2 people are from the govt also provides legal immunity to the Election Commissioner. Gyanesh was appointed by 2 out of 3 votes of Modi & Shah. ✂️ Votechori allegations of systematically deleting voters that don't serve the votebanks of our ruling govt like muslims & women in the Bengal Elections. Where a roll revision (SIR) was conducted a month before the elections giving unfair time for ones flagged to apeal. 🌋 Centralizing voter roll data that the EROs (Electoral Regional Officers) and BLOs (Booth level Officers) lose accessibility and are unable to verify voters ends up giving disproportionate power to the Chief Election Commissioner to decide who goes or not on the voter list. Multiple reports of officers not being able to access ER-net the so called 'digital' india software that is supposed to streamline election process 🤞 The people not on the voter list not only lose their voting rights but also lose access to the welfare schemes these are usually the ones already are underprivileged enough to not have documents like birth certificates and hence end up being treated as a second class citizen. 🤦‍♀️ All these along with shady incidents of EC intentionally giving non-machine readable voter data, - Govt building with 4000 EVMs catching fire, Booth CCTV footage denial and new 45day deletion rule Are the core of democracy 'ELECTIONS' are being rigged?????

VishwaGuru_Ghantal

24,006 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen