Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A reasonable take that I think everyone should watch twice, then share. Fmr Rep Tom Malinowski says AIPAC spent $2.5 million trying to defeat him. I expected him to spend the interview trashing AIPAC. Instead, he called out the far left for becoming just as intolerant of different views.... show more

Christopher Webb

156,511 subscribers

44,384 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

JD Vance on AIPAC and Israel influencing American Politics: “Israel, like a lot of other countries tries to influence American policies.. I take that as a given. And American leaders have to be very careful that when we pursue something, it is in America’s best interest and not for any other country’s best interest.” Clip Watch full Interview

JD Vance on AIPAC and Israel influencing American Politics: “Israel, like a lot of other countries tries to influence American policies.. I take that as a given. And American leaders have to be very careful that when we pursue something, it is in America’s best interest and not for any other country’s best interest.” Clip Watch full Interview

MJTruthUltra

199,452 views • 2 months ago

Sami Hamdi (Sami Hamdi سامي الهاشمي الحامدي) | Geopolitical Analyst | The International Interest: Even candidates funded by AIPAC are turning against Israel. Maxine Dexter won in Oregon with AIPAC money & went to Congress, compared Gaza to the Holocaust & voted for Rashida Tlaib's bill calling it genocide. Chris Menefee won with AIPAC backing. AIPAC tweeted congratulating him. He then voted for the bill to stop weapons going to Israel. James Fishback in Florida is openly saying he doesn't want to give $385 million to Israel & wants to keep it in Florida. Israeli media says this may be the final Congress & president willing to listen to Israel because they have lost a generation of Americans about to come into power.

Sami Hamdi (Sami Hamdi سامي الهاشمي الحامدي) | Geopolitical Analyst | The International Interest: Even candidates funded by AIPAC are turning against Israel. Maxine Dexter won in Oregon with AIPAC money & went to Congress, compared Gaza to the Holocaust & voted for Rashida Tlaib's bill calling it genocide. Chris Menefee won with AIPAC backing. AIPAC tweeted congratulating him. He then voted for the bill to stop weapons going to Israel. James Fishback in Florida is openly saying he doesn't want to give $385 million to Israel & wants to keep it in Florida. Israeli media says this may be the final Congress & president willing to listen to Israel because they have lost a generation of Americans about to come into power.

Clash Report

12,272 views • 1 month ago

People say Israel “buys” American politicians. So let’s follow the money. Abdul El-Sayed built his campaign around attacking Israel and AIPAC, accusing the organization of buying influence, punishing critics of Israel, and using antisemitism to silence opposition. After narrowly defeating Rep. Haley Stevens, he framed AIPAC’s spending against him as retaliation for his opposition to U.S. military aid to Israel. So what is AIPAC really? For starters, it's not a foreign lobby. It's an American organization, and compared with the biggest power players in Washington, its spending is far from exceptional. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Realtors, Amazon, and other major corporations spend far more on lobbying and elections. Israel doesn’t control American politics. So why is so much attention focused on it? #AIPAC #ElSayed

People say Israel “buys” American politicians. So let’s follow the money. Abdul El-Sayed built his campaign around attacking Israel and AIPAC, accusing the organization of buying influence, punishing critics of Israel, and using antisemitism to silence opposition. After narrowly defeating Rep. Haley Stevens, he framed AIPAC’s spending against him as retaliation for his opposition to U.S. military aid to Israel. So what is AIPAC really? For starters, it's not a foreign lobby. It's an American organization, and compared with the biggest power players in Washington, its spending is far from exceptional. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Realtors, Amazon, and other major corporations spend far more on lobbying and elections. Israel doesn’t control American politics. So why is so much attention focused on it? #AIPAC #ElSayed

HonestReporting

19,926 views • 22 days ago

NEW: AIPAC Caught Secretly Paying US Politicians The Zionist lobby has just been caught hiding donations to pro-Israel candidates after Americans have gained awareness about them. I interviewed the man who broke the story. I’m speaking with Matthew Eadie, the journalist who uncovered a hidden website AIPAC has been using to funnel donations to pro-Israel candidates without earmarking it as an AIPAC contribution. They appear to be replicating a scheme of secret donations across many ongoing Congressional races. How exactly is AIPAC hiding donations? Is AIPAC breaking election laws? Why is the Zionist lobby interested in this race? Are they hiding money in any other races? & more will be answered in this interview.

NEW: AIPAC Caught Secretly Paying US Politicians The Zionist lobby has just been caught hiding donations to pro-Israel candidates after Americans have gained awareness about them. I interviewed the man who broke the story. I’m speaking with Matthew Eadie, the journalist who uncovered a hidden website AIPAC has been using to funnel donations to pro-Israel candidates without earmarking it as an AIPAC contribution. They appear to be replicating a scheme of secret donations across many ongoing Congressional races. How exactly is AIPAC hiding donations? Is AIPAC breaking election laws? Why is the Zionist lobby interested in this race? Are they hiding money in any other races? & more will be answered in this interview.

YourFavoriteGuy

263,259 views • 10 months ago

"I am not afraid to condition aid for Israel" I challenged Rep. Seth Moulton, a Democrat running for the Senate in MA, on why he won't back the Block the Bombs Act, his view of Netanyahu, and his changed relationship with AIPAC. Full interview:

"I am not afraid to condition aid for Israel" I challenged Rep. Seth Moulton, a Democrat running for the Senate in MA, on why he won't back the Block the Bombs Act, his view of Netanyahu, and his changed relationship with AIPAC. Full interview:

Mehdi Hasan

193,229 views • 6 months ago

David Axelrod and Van Jones debate AIPAC re: #MISen ⬇️ Axelrod: “It's a legitimate question. Should essentially an agent of any foreign government, whether it's Israel or any other, be able to spend.. $30 million in a race like this to influence the outcome of that race?” Van Jones: “I don't think that they're an agent of a foreign power. I think they're American Jews… Their issue is to protect Israel… Why is AIPAC so mad? This guy is saying that the U.S. government can't even sell defensive weapons to Israel, which would make Israel completely defenseless. Now that would be a reason for a group of people who cares about Israelis to say this is not our guy.”

Sensitive content

David Axelrod and Van Jones debate AIPAC re: #MISen ⬇️ Axelrod: “It's a legitimate question. Should essentially an agent of any foreign government, whether it's Israel or any other, be able to spend.. $30 million in a race like this to influence the outcome of that race?” Van Jones: “I don't think that they're an agent of a foreign power. I think they're American Jews… Their issue is to protect Israel… Why is AIPAC so mad? This guy is saying that the U.S. government can't even sell defensive weapons to Israel, which would make Israel completely defenseless. Now that would be a reason for a group of people who cares about Israelis to say this is not our guy.”

Jacob N. Kornbluh

972,369 views • 23 days ago

"I think a lot of these AD's that are on this committee, these are the people that are firing coaches like me, left and right, I think some of these people need to be fired on this committee!" - Jon Gruden is shredding the CFB committee

"I think a lot of these AD's that are on this committee, these are the people that are firing coaches like me, left and right, I think some of these people need to be fired on this committee!" - Jon Gruden is shredding the CFB committee

Wake Up Barstool

565,892 views • 8 months ago

Karl-Anthony Towns says he'd take a $100,000,000 pay cut to keep the Knicks together Q: “You willing to take a $100 plus million dollar pay cut to like Jaylen Brunson did to keep this thing together?” KAT: “If we can keep it all together. We all got to get in the room and say we going to do it” “I mean, Jalen Brunson, shout out to him. That's a lot of money. But you know what? You can't put a value on the fact that he's at where he wants to be. And I think that's a big value number that no one's thinking of. “He's with his father. He's super comfortable. He has a team that believes in him. I think that belief that a team and organization can give you is something that's worth a lot, a lot, a lot of money. And they give him that belief, and I think that he felt that was the best situation for him, and I root him on for that”

Karl-Anthony Towns says he'd take a $100,000,000 pay cut to keep the Knicks together Q: “You willing to take a $100 plus million dollar pay cut to like Jaylen Brunson did to keep this thing together?” KAT: “If we can keep it all together. We all got to get in the room and say we going to do it” “I mean, Jalen Brunson, shout out to him. That's a lot of money. But you know what? You can't put a value on the fact that he's at where he wants to be. And I think that's a big value number that no one's thinking of. “He's with his father. He's super comfortable. He has a team that believes in him. I think that belief that a team and organization can give you is something that's worth a lot, a lot, a lot of money. And they give him that belief, and I think that he felt that was the best situation for him, and I root him on for that”

dank

1,582,456 views • 2 months ago

Haviv Retting Gur talk about AIPAC: AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism.

Haviv Retting Gur talk about AIPAC: AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism.

Open Source Intel

27,219 views • 10 months ago

Nick Shirley Says Andrew Callaghan Edited His Interview to Make Him Look Bad "I had a lot of respect for him. I used to watch him a lot and then I do this interview with him. And I knew right off the get-go, like where he was taking it." "He obviously came with this agenda... he just cut it all up. Any response where he was wrong or made him look bad he didn't show."

Nick Shirley Says Andrew Callaghan Edited His Interview to Make Him Look Bad "I had a lot of respect for him. I used to watch him a lot and then I do this interview with him. And I knew right off the get-go, like where he was taking it." "He obviously came with this agenda... he just cut it all up. Any response where he was wrong or made him look bad he didn't show."

PBD Podcast

96,014 views • 3 months ago

AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism. -- via Haviv Rettig Gur

AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism. -- via Haviv Rettig Gur

Max 📟

37,674 views • 10 months ago

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that AIPAC is doing everything they can to keep me out of the top two & secure a win for Scott Wiener in November. First we heard reports that an AIPAC affiliated group is dumping $475k into this race at the last minute to keep me out of the general. And now, according to multiple sources, a pro-Israel donor said Scott Wiener admitted to lying about his stance on the genocide in Gaza for political points. Scott will say and do anything to get into office, and so will the AIPAC lobby that’s backing him. In a general head-to-head, I'm tied with Scott Wiener in the polls, which means we could win this in November and send someone to Congress that will actually fight to end AIPAC and corporate money in our politics. The era of corporate Democrats that lie to voters is over. San Francisco, make sure you vote on June 2nd.

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that AIPAC is doing everything they can to keep me out of the top two & secure a win for Scott Wiener in November. First we heard reports that an AIPAC affiliated group is dumping $475k into this race at the last minute to keep me out of the general. And now, according to multiple sources, a pro-Israel donor said Scott Wiener admitted to lying about his stance on the genocide in Gaza for political points. Scott will say and do anything to get into office, and so will the AIPAC lobby that’s backing him. In a general head-to-head, I'm tied with Scott Wiener in the polls, which means we could win this in November and send someone to Congress that will actually fight to end AIPAC and corporate money in our politics. The era of corporate Democrats that lie to voters is over. San Francisco, make sure you vote on June 2nd.

Saikat Chakrabarti

59,199 views • 2 months ago

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed’s win in Michigan’s Democratic primary “was one of the most extraordinary victories in modern political history,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) says, adding that even though his moderate opponent, Rep. Haley Stevens, outspent him 9-1, “he managed to win.” “$60 million in billionaire-funded super PAC money came into that race, half from AIPAC,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “...What you had is AIPAC spending $30 million in the Democratic primary trying to defeat Abdul. They lost, and now they're saying, 'We're going to support this guy, Rogers, who is a Republican.’”

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed’s win in Michigan’s Democratic primary “was one of the most extraordinary victories in modern political history,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) says, adding that even though his moderate opponent, Rep. Haley Stevens, outspent him 9-1, “he managed to win.” “$60 million in billionaire-funded super PAC money came into that race, half from AIPAC,” he tells Margaret Brennan. “...What you had is AIPAC spending $30 million in the Democratic primary trying to defeat Abdul. They lost, and now they're saying, 'We're going to support this guy, Rogers, who is a Republican.’”

Face The Nation

12,679 views • 19 days ago

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

543,004 views • 2 years ago

SNEAKO speaks on ChudTheBuilder revealing he spoke to him and warned him to “stay inside for a while” because “people are looking and itching for violence” over his content. “I reached out to him. I told him, ‘Bro, you should probably do some desktops, because a lot of people are thinking that you are going to be a target. A lot of people want him d*ad, I’ll just put it straight up.’ I don’t agree with a lot of what he does, it can be antagonizing, but a lot of stuff’s funny, I can’t even lie to you.”

SNEAKO speaks on ChudTheBuilder revealing he spoke to him and warned him to “stay inside for a while” because “people are looking and itching for violence” over his content. “I reached out to him. I told him, ‘Bro, you should probably do some desktops, because a lot of people are thinking that you are going to be a target. A lot of people want him d*ad, I’ll just put it straight up.’ I don’t agree with a lot of what he does, it can be antagonizing, but a lot of stuff’s funny, I can’t even lie to you.”

SNEAKO UPDATES

527,957 views • 3 months ago

Newt Gingrich just dropped the only line you need to hear that captures Trump’s genius as a long-term visionary. Once Hannity heard this, he could only react with awe. “Think about this: In May of 2016, speaking to AIPAC, Trump outlined a vision of peace in the Middle East. That’s 2016. Nine years later, he’s DEVELOPING THE REALITY. “Now, that is a level of strategic discipline and strategic commitment that almost nobody gives him credit for.” HANNITY: “He’s so much smarter than the left knows, and he’s five steps ahead.”

Newt Gingrich just dropped the only line you need to hear that captures Trump’s genius as a long-term visionary. Once Hannity heard this, he could only react with awe. “Think about this: In May of 2016, speaking to AIPAC, Trump outlined a vision of peace in the Middle East. That’s 2016. Nine years later, he’s DEVELOPING THE REALITY. “Now, that is a level of strategic discipline and strategic commitment that almost nobody gives him credit for.” HANNITY: “He’s so much smarter than the left knows, and he’s five steps ahead.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

641,256 views • 10 months ago