Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A render running since Tuesday makes Sheldon's triangle feel less like a theory and more like a complaint. I'd be interested in his response to $0.003/sec with fast generation and comparable quality. That's Vivix W1's proposed correction, and for a real-time interactive video model it matters every time you... show more

Zohaib Ai

27,700 subscribers

26,048 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I can already see the tree I'd ski into. If this perspective became interactive, I'd need cheap attempts more than a heroic opening shot. Vivix W1's $0.003/sec would make another eight generated seconds $0.024, with fast generation and comparable quality. That's a useful starting point for a real-time interactive video model you can actually spend time learning to use. The real-time capability is on its API; the run I'd like to try is still a possibility.

I can already see the tree I'd ski into. If this perspective became interactive, I'd need cheap attempts more than a heroic opening shot. Vivix W1's $0.003/sec would make another eight generated seconds $0.024, with fast generation and comparable quality. That's a useful starting point for a real-time interactive video model you can actually spend time learning to use. The real-time capability is on its API; the run I'd like to try is still a possibility.

Maria

24,201 views • 4 days ago

$0.003/sec changes the economics of running real-time AI video. I’ve been testing Vivix W1, and that number is hard to ignore. The comparison shows visual quality on par with the models alongside W1. About a second of generation time per second of footage, too. But W1 isn’t just another video generator. It’s built for real-time interactive video, where the model keeps generating as the experience moves forward. Every second of that experience adds to the generation bill. At $0.003/sec, you can actually start thinking about a story that keeps going as viewers make choices. Vivix.AI already supports real-time generation through the API. The browser playground currently uses offline generation, with real-time browser tools coming soon. Continuous video is one thing. Giving viewers meaningful control is another. If I change my mind halfway through a story, how much can it actually change with me? That’s the interesting challenge. The next plot twist could be yours 👇

$0.003/sec changes the economics of running real-time AI video. I’ve been testing Vivix W1, and that number is hard to ignore. The comparison shows visual quality on par with the models alongside W1. About a second of generation time per second of footage, too. But W1 isn’t just another video generator. It’s built for real-time interactive video, where the model keeps generating as the experience moves forward. Every second of that experience adds to the generation bill. At $0.003/sec, you can actually start thinking about a story that keeps going as viewers make choices. Vivix.AI already supports real-time generation through the API. The browser playground currently uses offline generation, with real-time browser tools coming soon. Continuous video is one thing. Giving viewers meaningful control is another. If I change my mind halfway through a story, how much can it actually change with me? That’s the interesting challenge. The next plot twist could be yours 👇

AI StackLab

222,340 views • 5 days ago

Same perfume concept. Four video models. The difference becomes obvious once the scene starts changing. Vivix W1 keeps the subject and product feeling coherent as the studio transitions into the storm. For me, that matters more than how dramatic the storm looks. An eight-second version costs $0.024 to generate. Waiting for it takes roughly eight seconds. This comparison only shows a finished clip. W1 is built for real-time interactive video, not just one-shot generation. Vivix.AI already offers that real-time capability through the API. At $0.003/sec, that also makes experimenting with interactive video workflows a lot more accessible. Letting a viewer influence how a scene unfolds would mean paying for generation throughout the interaction. Worth watching the comparison closely. The model behind the studio-to-storm transition 👇

Same perfume concept. Four video models. The difference becomes obvious once the scene starts changing. Vivix W1 keeps the subject and product feeling coherent as the studio transitions into the storm. For me, that matters more than how dramatic the storm looks. An eight-second version costs $0.024 to generate. Waiting for it takes roughly eight seconds. This comparison only shows a finished clip. W1 is built for real-time interactive video, not just one-shot generation. Vivix.AI already offers that real-time capability through the API. At $0.003/sec, that also makes experimenting with interactive video workflows a lot more accessible. Letting a viewer influence how a scene unfolds would mean paying for generation throughout the interaction. Worth watching the comparison closely. The model behind the studio-to-storm transition 👇

Liam | AI Tools & News

42,351 views • 5 days ago

Solaris is an interface world model: an interactive, real-time video model that can create and render an interface for you. But most importantly, Solaris has this awe-like quality. Everything you do with it feels impossibly close to what computers should have always been.

Solaris is an interface world model: an interactive, real-time video model that can create and render an interface for you. But most importantly, Solaris has this awe-like quality. Everything you do with it feels impossibly close to what computers should have always been.

Cristóbal Valenzuela

32,090 views • 1 month ago

$0.003 per second for video generation, without compromising on speed or visual quality? The supplied comparisons put Vivix W1 alongside leading models on visual quality. It also delivers eight seconds of video in roughly eight seconds. But the bigger story is that W1 is a real-time interactive video model. Every extra minute of interaction means more video to generate and pay for. Making generation this affordable could make interactive stories and live visuals practical to run, not just impressive demos. Live visuals are what I’m most curious about. Generating quickly is one thing; reacting at the right moment is what would make them feel live. Vivix.AI already offers real-time generation through the API; the browser playground currently produces finished clips. A closer look at what could power those live visuals 👇

$0.003 per second for video generation, without compromising on speed or visual quality? The supplied comparisons put Vivix W1 alongside leading models on visual quality. It also delivers eight seconds of video in roughly eight seconds. But the bigger story is that W1 is a real-time interactive video model. Every extra minute of interaction means more video to generate and pay for. Making generation this affordable could make interactive stories and live visuals practical to run, not just impressive demos. Live visuals are what I’m most curious about. Generating quickly is one thing; reacting at the right moment is what would make them feel live. Vivix.AI already offers real-time generation through the API; the browser playground currently produces finished clips. A closer look at what could power those live visuals 👇

Kalsoom (ghotai )

71,646 views • 4 days ago

An hour of live AI video generation now costs $10.80 At $0.003 a second, Vivix W1 generates a full minute for just 18 cents. That price matters because of what W1 is. It's a real-time interactive video model. Through the API, it keeps generating video while the experience is happening, and you can shape what comes next. With a normal clip generator, you pay once and you're done. Real-time interactive video keeps generating as you use it. Every second generated is another second you pay for. At higher per-second rates, that bill can grow quickly. It's hard to ship an interactive product when every user session costs a fortune. With W1, the math starts to look workable. And they didn't buy that price by cutting quality or speed. In Vivix’s supplied tests, eight-second videos averaged 7.7 seconds to generate from text and 8.4 seconds with one reference image. In the side-by-side comparisons, W1 holds its own against Seedance 2.5, Kling 3.0, and H3 Max on the same prompts. An exploding taxi, a skyline shot, a robot serving drinks on a plane. It's not perfect yet: • Cinematic fidelity still has gaps • Complex motion and dense scenes still need work • Full-scale training is still underway, so this is an early checkpoint How to try it: • Real-time generation is live through the API today • The browser playground does offline generation for now. Submit a prompt and you get a finished clip. Real-time browser tools are coming soon My take: I've seen a lot of interactive video demos that would cost a fortune to run in production. This looks priced for something you could actually ship. Once a minute of live video generation costs 18 cents, interactive stories, games, and characters could become an everyday medium instead of a tech demo. What I want to see next from Vivix.AI: better complex motion. Improve that and the use cases open up fast. Put your project’s runtime into the equation 👇

An hour of live AI video generation now costs $10.80 At $0.003 a second, Vivix W1 generates a full minute for just 18 cents. That price matters because of what W1 is. It's a real-time interactive video model. Through the API, it keeps generating video while the experience is happening, and you can shape what comes next. With a normal clip generator, you pay once and you're done. Real-time interactive video keeps generating as you use it. Every second generated is another second you pay for. At higher per-second rates, that bill can grow quickly. It's hard to ship an interactive product when every user session costs a fortune. With W1, the math starts to look workable. And they didn't buy that price by cutting quality or speed. In Vivix’s supplied tests, eight-second videos averaged 7.7 seconds to generate from text and 8.4 seconds with one reference image. In the side-by-side comparisons, W1 holds its own against Seedance 2.5, Kling 3.0, and H3 Max on the same prompts. An exploding taxi, a skyline shot, a robot serving drinks on a plane. It's not perfect yet: • Cinematic fidelity still has gaps • Complex motion and dense scenes still need work • Full-scale training is still underway, so this is an early checkpoint How to try it: • Real-time generation is live through the API today • The browser playground does offline generation for now. Submit a prompt and you get a finished clip. Real-time browser tools are coming soon My take: I've seen a lot of interactive video demos that would cost a fortune to run in production. This looks priced for something you could actually ship. Once a minute of live video generation costs 18 cents, interactive stories, games, and characters could become an everyday medium instead of a tech demo. What I want to see next from Vivix.AI: better complex motion. Improve that and the use cases open up fast. Put your project’s runtime into the equation 👇

Raja Chichulkar

18,899 views • 5 days ago

AI video is hitting the same wall AI agents hit a year ago: The tech works. The economics don't. That's why Vivix.AI caught my attention. Their new real-time interactive video model, W1, generates video for just $0.003/sec while staying surprisingly fast and competitive on quality. To put that in perspective: At the supplied rates, an equal-length Seedance 2.5 clip costs about 77 times as much as a W1 clip. But the interesting part isn't cheaper clips. It's what happens when video becomes cheap enough to run continuously. Interactive stories. Live AI-generated experiences. Visuals that respond in real time. Those products only work if generation costs stay low. W1 still has room to improve on cinematic fidelity and complex scenes, but making real-time video economically viable feels like a much bigger milestone than most people realise. Here’s the W1 rate I’d use in a project estimate:

AI video is hitting the same wall AI agents hit a year ago: The tech works. The economics don't. That's why Vivix.AI caught my attention. Their new real-time interactive video model, W1, generates video for just $0.003/sec while staying surprisingly fast and competitive on quality. To put that in perspective: At the supplied rates, an equal-length Seedance 2.5 clip costs about 77 times as much as a W1 clip. But the interesting part isn't cheaper clips. It's what happens when video becomes cheap enough to run continuously. Interactive stories. Live AI-generated experiences. Visuals that respond in real time. Those products only work if generation costs stay low. W1 still has room to improve on cinematic fidelity and complex scenes, but making real-time video economically viable feels like a much bigger milestone than most people realise. Here’s the W1 rate I’d use in a project estimate:

Bishal Nandi

30,268 views • 4 days ago

YOU can't destroy something that was never yours to begin with. Englot didn't happen because of an organization, a plan, or a marketing move. It happened because two people genuinely liked each other. Because two women actually fell for each other... in real time, in real life. We watched it unfold. A straight girl, in front of the entire world, slowly realizing she had fallen for a woman. For Engfa. We saw it. They lived it. And once something that real exists, you can't undo it. You can't rewrite it. And you definitely can't take credit for it. That's why Englot can't be ruined. Because it was never built on control, contracts, or strategy. It was built on honesty, on feelings they didn't even know how to hide. From two women who weren't afraid to feel... And that's why, no matter what, Englot will always be Englot. Englot will never die. Just like their feelings for each other never died...

YOU can't destroy something that was never yours to begin with. Englot didn't happen because of an organization, a plan, or a marketing move. It happened because two people genuinely liked each other. Because two women actually fell for each other... in real time, in real life. We watched it unfold. A straight girl, in front of the entire world, slowly realizing she had fallen for a woman. For Engfa. We saw it. They lived it. And once something that real exists, you can't undo it. You can't rewrite it. And you definitely can't take credit for it. That's why Englot can't be ruined. Because it was never built on control, contracts, or strategy. It was built on honesty, on feelings they didn't even know how to hide. From two women who weren't afraid to feel... And that's why, no matter what, Englot will always be Englot. Englot will never die. Just like their feelings for each other never died...

Shlohmo

31,828 views • 9 months ago

🌙 i feel like i’ve been on here for a really long time and just talk about my whole life, but you know, i feel like i haven’t connected with you in a really long time. and it takes time for me to get comfortable cause i’m so awkward so, i’m comfortable now thank you, giselle ♡

🌙 i feel like i’ve been on here for a really long time and just talk about my whole life, but you know, i feel like i haven’t connected with you in a really long time. and it takes time for me to get comfortable cause i’m so awkward so, i’m comfortable now thank you, giselle ♡

13 ✿

15,341 views • 6 months ago

you are making video games all wrong for decades almost all game art time went into reverse-engineering the end result you start with concept art of what you WANT it to look like. then for YEARS you walk the computer backwards into something it can process: a rendering engine, 3d assets that fit that engine, and a gamer’s local hardware that has to turn all of that back into a high fidelity image incredibly slow. incredibly expensive. but it was the best we had ai makes that pipeline faster as everyone is figuring out today. but they’re missing the real unlock: YOU DON’T NEED THAT PIPELINE AT ALL if you have a reference for the end look, you don’t model it in 3d. you don’t reverse-engineer into an engine you keep a very basic greybox model of the world as the source of truth, and track every entity in real time. it doesn’t need to look good at all… the player never sees it! a fast video model turns that into the “game” in real time. it doesn’t have to look like a game. it can look like a 2d cartoon or cinematic live action fal’s h3 max is very fast. astra 6 low-effort too. neither is fully realtime yet but together they can generate continuous, coherent, player-controlled scenes, faster than playback early demo:

you are making video games all wrong for decades almost all game art time went into reverse-engineering the end result you start with concept art of what you WANT it to look like. then for YEARS you walk the computer backwards into something it can process: a rendering engine, 3d assets that fit that engine, and a gamer’s local hardware that has to turn all of that back into a high fidelity image incredibly slow. incredibly expensive. but it was the best we had ai makes that pipeline faster as everyone is figuring out today. but they’re missing the real unlock: YOU DON’T NEED THAT PIPELINE AT ALL if you have a reference for the end look, you don’t model it in 3d. you don’t reverse-engineer into an engine you keep a very basic greybox model of the world as the source of truth, and track every entity in real time. it doesn’t need to look good at all… the player never sees it! a fast video model turns that into the “game” in real time. it doesn’t have to look like a game. it can look like a 2d cartoon or cinematic live action fal’s h3 max is very fast. astra 6 low-effort too. neither is fully realtime yet but together they can generate continuous, coherent, player-controlled scenes, faster than playback early demo:

Udi Wertheimer

125,114 views • 1 month ago

Auntie: “Since it was a team you stayed with for a long time, it must not have been easy to transfer.” Gumayusi: “I had a lot of thoughts and emotions (at the time). Now... I feel like I made the right decision coming here.”

Auntie: “Since it was a team you stayed with for a long time, it must not have been easy to transfer.” Gumayusi: “I had a lot of thoughts and emotions (at the time). Now... I feel like I made the right decision coming here.”

ye?

44,834 views • 5 months ago

Grok Voice + Live Camera feels unreal You don't have to type or search Just point, ask, and get answers in real-time "Grok, what am I looking at?" Grok sees it and tells you instantly It's like having a genius friend on a video call who sees exactly what you see and explains it the moment you ask

Grok Voice + Live Camera feels unreal You don't have to type or search Just point, ask, and get answers in real-time "Grok, what am I looking at?" Grok sees it and tells you instantly It's like having a genius friend on a video call who sees exactly what you see and explains it the moment you ask

X Freeze

2,132,174 views • 8 months ago

Treeo is an interactive voting game where you can clown on other users' opinions in real time I wanted all the reactions people send to feel continuous and ambient, so I tried to make them feel like they're floating past you in a stream

Treeo is an interactive voting game where you can clown on other users' opinions in real time I wanted all the reactions people send to feel continuous and ambient, so I tried to make them feel like they're floating past you in a stream

Mike Rundle

17,319 views • 10 months ago

💬: how would you like to spend your christmas this year? 🐶: this time too, i'd like to spend time with the members in a simple way and enjoying delicious food. since there's a lot of things to look back on this year so i'd like to spend time talking about those things!

💬: how would you like to spend your christmas this year? 🐶: this time too, i'd like to spend time with the members in a simple way and enjoying delicious food. since there's a lot of things to look back on this year so i'd like to spend time talking about those things!

비니

64,220 views • 10 months ago

someone once asked what it feels like to meet jeff ; it feels like in the world there’s only you, him, and his music like nothing else matters except for enjoying the short time you have to spend with him & making the most out of it it feels like true happiness ♡︎

someone once asked what it feels like to meet jeff ; it feels like in the world there’s only you, him, and his music like nothing else matters except for enjoying the short time you have to spend with him & making the most out of it it feels like true happiness ♡︎

˚ 𝐦𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘴🍋

82,470 views • 3 years ago

Trump on his 50-year mortgage plan: "It's not even a big deal! You go from 40 to 50 years. And what it means is you pay something less. From 30, some people had a 40, and now they have a 50...You pay it over a long period of time. It's not like a big factor!"

Trump on his 50-year mortgage plan: "It's not even a big deal! You go from 40 to 50 years. And what it means is you pay something less. From 30, some people had a 40, and now they have a 50...You pay it over a long period of time. It's not like a big factor!"

Home of the Brave

1,648,570 views • 11 months ago

"It's just consistency. It's just good old fashioned 'do the work' every single day. Days that you don't feel like doing it, you show up and you do it. And when you do that -every day- for a long period of time, you wind up having a success that goes on for quite a few years."

"It's just consistency. It's just good old fashioned 'do the work' every single day. Days that you don't feel like doing it, you show up and you do it. And when you do that -every day- for a long period of time, you wind up having a success that goes on for quite a few years."

The Winning Difference

23,217 views • 1 year ago

"It's just consistency. It's just good old fashioned 'do the work' every single day. Days that you don't feel like doing it, you show up and you do it. And when you do that -every day- for a long period of time, you wind up having a success that goes on for quite a few years."

"It's just consistency. It's just good old fashioned 'do the work' every single day. Days that you don't feel like doing it, you show up and you do it. And when you do that -every day- for a long period of time, you wind up having a success that goes on for quite a few years."

The Winning Difference

221,410 views • 2 years ago

✨ Every time the video models get better, the try on model on Photo AI also becomes a lot more useful, as a large % of my customers now are e-commerce store And showing clothes in a video is nice for sales! With AI this means stores don't need to do expensive shoots flying a model and entire camera and light crew around the world They can just upload a few photos of their models, then upload the clothes, and describe the setting (like a beach in Thailand) and in less than 10 seconds it's generated, for a video in less than a minute! Below is the input: a dress laid flat, and output: a full video shoot

✨ Every time the video models get better, the try on model on Photo AI also becomes a lot more useful, as a large % of my customers now are e-commerce store And showing clothes in a video is nice for sales! With AI this means stores don't need to do expensive shoots flying a model and entire camera and light crew around the world They can just upload a few photos of their models, then upload the clothes, and describe the setting (like a beach in Thailand) and in less than 10 seconds it's generated, for a video in less than a minute! Below is the input: a dress laid flat, and output: a full video shoot

@levelsio

334,317 views • 1 year ago