正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🔥A Resident Evil 3 Remake mod bringing back the original game is gaining attention — here’s what we learned. Resident Evil 3: Last Escape isn’t just another gameplay or difficulty mod. Its creator aims to transform Resident Evil 3 Remake into a much more faithful recreation of the original...

574,930 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🎮 Resident Evil 4 Remake Gets a Co-op Mode Before Resident Evil 5 Remake. A modder known as claybtv has announced the launch of an open beta for a co-op mode in Resident Evil 4 Remake. The modification, called Multiplayer Mod, allows two players to experience the entire campaign together. According to the developer, the mod synchronizes enemies, story events, doors, switches, alarms, and many other gameplay elements between two separate game instances in real time. From a technical standpoint, it's a remarkable achievement. Resident Evil 4 Remake was originally designed as a single-player experience, meaning that creating stable synchronization between two players required overcoming numerous complex challenges at the engine level. The mod is currently in beta testing, and players may encounter performance issues, animation glitches, and other bugs. The developer is already working on fixes through ongoing updates. 🤔 Perhaps the most interesting part of this story isn't the mod itself, but the community's reaction to it. This is the first fully featured co-op project built for a Resident Evil title on the RE Engine, allowing players to experience nearly the entire campaign together from start to finish. In many ways, the project highlights the continued demand for cooperative gameplay within modern Resident Evil titles. The positive response it has received may be further evidence that there is still significant demand for cooperative experiences within the Resident Evil franchise.

RENEWS

711,155 次观看 • 1 个月前

🎮 A Resident Evil 3 Remake fan-made co-op mod is now in development. The success of the recently released co-op mod for Resident Evil 4 Remake appears to have sparked a new wave of multiplayer projects across the Resident Evil modding community. 🛠️ Modder HeySnippy is now developing a fully playable co-op mod for Resident Evil 3 Remake, allowing two players to experience Jill Valentine’s campaign together. According to the project’s current goals, the mod aims to support synchronized gameplay, shared progression, enemy synchronization, cutscenes, and campaign-wide co-op from start to finish. 😳 The project is being built on a custom networking framework called Snippyet, featuring account authentication via email, Discord, and Steam, along with a friends list, session management, and the ability to join games using room codes or direct friend invitations. Another planned feature will allow players to drop items on the ground instead of discarding them, making it possible to share ammunition, healing items, and other resources with their co-op partner. 🎯 According to the developer, the most technically challenging milestones have already been completed, with development now focused on polishing gameplay systems and expanding features to deliver a seamless co-op experience. The mod remains in active development with no release date announced, though early gameplay footage already shows significant progress. ☝🏻 The emergence of another ambitious co-op project shortly after the success of the Resident Evil 4 Remake co-op mod once again highlights the growing demand for cooperative gameplay in modern Resident Evil titles. While these projects remain unofficial, they continue to show just how eager many fans are to revisit the series alongside a friend.

RENEWS

456,101 次观看 • 25 天前

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

Terri Green

16,778 次观看 • 2 个月前

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Terri Green

24,466 次观看 • 2 个月前

I want to clarify something about posting about the statues or figures. I don't sell the Resident Evil products, statues, or figures that I post. I only share information and links about new pre-orders that might interest the community, as I'm also a collector. Many large Resident Evil community accounts also share them, both licensed and unlicensed. I also help inform the community on how to get official Resident Evil merchandise from Japan by translating for them. is one of the largest statue shops out there (they're a shop, they don't manufacture the figures), and I've also bought from their site before and received the figure. If people are curious, they can just check out the studio's other statues/busts on the Orzgk website or at other reputable retailers that also sell the SAME figure. You can also wait for the first photos and/or videos of the statues in person; many studios provide these to retailers after pre-orders close. In case they cancel the project, they'll refund your money in full. So, to everyone who insults me, do your research before accusing me of sharing potential "scams" or creating the "conceptual" images that the studio shares of its products. I don't use AI in my posts or in the edits I make (posters, collages, etc.). Besides, X has an AI detector and flags posts if you created something with AI (it can't be disabled even if you have a verified account). • Here's a video of the finished Requiem replica. You can see more on the official IG account:

ᴋᴛʏɴʏ | ᴋᴀᴛʜʏᴀɴʜʏ 🌿

14,714 次观看 • 3 个月前

Edward McLaren's Bothelford's Gone could be set in many towns in Britain. It's the story of teenager Jack Grundon, whose parents divorce, raise him on screens, sedate him with ADHD medication, and subject him to a school system which exposes him to perversion and anti-white literature. Jack befriends Agatha, the victim of a Muslim grooming gang in Bothelford, and tries to rescue her from a forced marriage to one of her abusers. If the left has its Omnicause — a suite of seemingly unrelated issues like climate change, queer liberation, and Gaza, which algorithms and ideology present as one struggle — then Bothelford's Gone proves the right has an Omnicrisis. The existential issues facing Britain are sapping its population of the courage to turn the tide against entropy. ‘So evil,’ he said, lowly. ‘What am I supposed to call it? Evil. It is evil.’ What he didn’t say aloud, but felt shiver through his head against his own will, was the new fact that he had just realised: that he too was evil. He was evil and had been made to participate in evil in order to prevent him from fighting it. Jack didn’t feel this to be an exaggeration, and he knew—he just knew—on some level that this was a tactic of the chimera. A monster sits at the centre of Bothelford, like the drunk Arab disrespecting its war memorial. This egregore has a hypnotic television for a head and fangs dripping with blood. But that blood might pool into a Powellite halo behind Bothelford's quasi-pagon patron saint, Marine Emery, who calls for Englishmen to avenge their children and slay the monsters of modern Britain...

Connor Tomlinson

20,713 次观看 • 17 天前

So much of what's circulating about MGSΔ on the internet is unreasonable and unfair. The treatment of the game is really strange and unfair, and I'm going to show you another letter of nobility from the development team that NO ONE has noticed since the game's release in August 2025. No one has mentioned it on Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, etc., yet I have rarely seen anything so respectful. MGSΔ is also a remake that keeps a low profile on the internet, is sometimes ashamed of its subtle additions and improvements, and has HUGE respect for the main MGS3 development team. MGSΔ is also a remake that “hides” its credits in favor of the classic MGS3 credits at the end of the game with Starsailor's iconic theme “Way to Fall,” choosing sobriety and humility when it comes to the development team that worked on MGSΔ. In fact, there are more than 10 minutes of credits for the remake available in the “EXTRA” menu of MGSΔ, presenting the staff working on this project, with a new and already legendary orchestration by Naoki Nakashima that fits perfectly with the Metal Gear universe. Given the considerable work involved, the decision to put this in second place and leave the original MGS3 credits (from the original team) is once again a sign of great respect on the part of the development team. That's not all. From the introduction onwards, the game presents itself as “based on MGS3.” With no mention of the current staff, but rather the “Original” staff (introduction) with their names highlighted. As far as I can remember, no remake project has ever done this in the world of video games. Voluntarily stepping aside to continue promoting the original team, saying (Okamura) “Keep us honest” (for the future of MG) is incredible proof of respect for the saga. Okamura and the development team reading hate messages from angry “fans” on Metal Gear Hotline was also a powerful and painful moment to watch. Okamura also said that he would like to work with Hideo Kojima again in the future. At what point can we say that this is not sincere? I just don't understand. Yet we still see insults, people saying that the game doesn't respect Kojima, and a community divided in two. We also have misinformation, sometimes deliberate by some media (the release of MGSVOL1 saying that the credits did not mention Hideo Kojima), and questionable omissions of the game from major video game events for important titles such as sound design and best remake... I wonder how long this “targeting” of Konami will continue, because OBJECTIVELY, there is a genuine desire to do well. Admittedly, there was a difficult start with performance issues in certain parts of the game (which have been fixed) and a misstep with FOX HUNT, but the game does not deserve the hatred we see everywhere. If we want to see METAL GEAR continue, we need to soften our judgment and trust them. Fortunately, Delta's sales were good and the series will be able to continue evolving, but I still have a slight fear for the future... Because there is always strange hostility on the internet. Sorry if this tweet was a bit long, but it had to be said.

Outsider Snake

33,068 次观看 • 7 个月前