Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇵🇸🇮🇱A scene from Jerusalem today that needs no explanation—only honesty: A Palestinian bus driver beaten and cursed by a group of settler kids, standing there unable to defend himself… not out of fear—out of certainty. He knows that if he lifts a finger to protect himself, within two seconds... he becomes: “a terrorist”… “an attacker”… “attempted stabbing”… “attempted ramming”… and the bullet is ready long before any “investigation.” In Jerusalem, the attacker is a protected settler child… and the victim is a Palestinian who must prove his innocence even when he is the one being beaten. This isn’t an incident. It’s a system: the aggressor is shielded, the assaulted is punished. This is how the city is run— and this is how the “law” looks when the law belongs to an occupier. Oppression doesn’t hide anymore… it hits in broad daylight, and everyone sees it.show more

SilencedSirs◼️

171,379 subscribers

106,614 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Seconds before the de@th of a Brahmin man who was kiIIed and thrown in a farm field. His eyes were gauged out by the dozens of people. It is no less than the lynching. See how he is fighting for his life. Family contacted us and told the whole incident. They said that no one was helping them and no media was covering this incident. He is survived by two small kids. Thousands of such incidents go unnoticed. An incident from Madhya Pradesh.

Seconds before the de@th of a Brahmin man who was kiIIed and thrown in a farm field. His eyes were gauged out by the dozens of people. It is no less than the lynching. See how he is fighting for his life. Family contacted us and told the whole incident. They said that no one was helping them and no media was covering this incident. He is survived by two small kids. Thousands of such incidents go unnoticed. An incident from Madhya Pradesh.

Shubham Sharma

146,126 views • 2 years ago

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

Jason Lavigne

34,521 views • 5 months ago

A Jewish rapper just released a song scolding a Palestinian for not loving Palestine correctly. That is what is happening on track four of Iceman, the first of three albums Drake dropped overnight. He goes after DJ Khaled for not being pro-Palestine enough. > “Your people are still waitin’ for a Free Palestine. But apparently, everything isn’t black and white and red and green.” Read it twice. There is no Gaza in the lyric. No mention of a single Palestinian besides Khaled himself. There is a Palestinian artist being publicly dressed down by a non-Palestinian for not performing his identity correctly. Khaled has stayed quiet on Gaza since October 7. In this climate, that is not betrayal. It is self-protection. Anything he says will get ripped apart by the loudest faction in the room. A Palestinian-American producer in Miami is allowed to live his life. What Drake is doing is the opposite of pro-Palestine. He has appointed himself the man who decides how Palestinians should behave in public. This is exactly what Kendrick was pointing at on “Not Like Us.” Drake doesn’t have an identity. He has a marketing department. He locates himself wherever the audience is loudest, and Free Palestine is the loudest audience right now. That’s the costume. The timing tells the rest. Kendrick called Drake a certified pedophile on the biggest song of 2024. Drake sued his label for defamation. He lost. Now he is back with three albums in a single drop, and the first political move he reaches for is “Free Palestine” deployed as ammunition against another artist. That is what celebrity image rehab looks like in 2026. Find a justice cause that is currently flattering. Wear it loud enough that the cause and your comeback blur into the same press cycle. Solidarity used to mean helping people. Now it means using them.

A Jewish rapper just released a song scolding a Palestinian for not loving Palestine correctly. That is what is happening on track four of Iceman, the first of three albums Drake dropped overnight. He goes after DJ Khaled for not being pro-Palestine enough. > “Your people are still waitin’ for a Free Palestine. But apparently, everything isn’t black and white and red and green.” Read it twice. There is no Gaza in the lyric. No mention of a single Palestinian besides Khaled himself. There is a Palestinian artist being publicly dressed down by a non-Palestinian for not performing his identity correctly. Khaled has stayed quiet on Gaza since October 7. In this climate, that is not betrayal. It is self-protection. Anything he says will get ripped apart by the loudest faction in the room. A Palestinian-American producer in Miami is allowed to live his life. What Drake is doing is the opposite of pro-Palestine. He has appointed himself the man who decides how Palestinians should behave in public. This is exactly what Kendrick was pointing at on “Not Like Us.” Drake doesn’t have an identity. He has a marketing department. He locates himself wherever the audience is loudest, and Free Palestine is the loudest audience right now. That’s the costume. The timing tells the rest. Kendrick called Drake a certified pedophile on the biggest song of 2024. Drake sued his label for defamation. He lost. Now he is back with three albums in a single drop, and the first political move he reaches for is “Free Palestine” deployed as ammunition against another artist. That is what celebrity image rehab looks like in 2026. Find a justice cause that is currently flattering. Wear it loud enough that the cause and your comeback blur into the same press cycle. Solidarity used to mean helping people. Now it means using them.

Hen Mazzig

68,672 views • 3 months ago

there is a driver on the wall, he is still inside his car after a moment and his car is still rolling forwards at the fastest section of the circuit the outrage is about how egregious it is that this was deemed a “single yellow” in the first place when it should’ve been a red.

there is a driver on the wall, he is still inside his car after a moment and his car is still rolling forwards at the fastest section of the circuit the outrage is about how egregious it is that this was deemed a “single yellow” in the first place when it should’ve been a red.

d。

285,142 views • 1 month ago

I felt sad seeing the 90 year old Duke of Kent being ill-treated, excluded & humiliated like this. This is an old man who is literally working to his death on behalf of a family that doesn’t care a single jolt about him. Watch how they all stand on one side leaving him out there by himself. He tries to interact with them and they completely ignore him as if he doesn’t exist. This is elder abuse and shows the cold institution that is the royal family.

I felt sad seeing the 90 year old Duke of Kent being ill-treated, excluded & humiliated like this. This is an old man who is literally working to his death on behalf of a family that doesn’t care a single jolt about him. Watch how they all stand on one side leaving him out there by himself. He tries to interact with them and they completely ignore him as if he doesn’t exist. This is elder abuse and shows the cold institution that is the royal family.

Senior Lieutenant Zandi Sussex

106,140 views • 2 months ago

🚨🎙️ Carlo Ancelotti RESPONDS to question on Neymar and the Cup: 🗣️ Reporter: “Are you REALLY sure you want this legend out of the Cup??” 🗣️ Ancelotti: “First of all… nobody ‘wants’ a player like Neymar out of anything.” “We are talking about one of the biggest talents of this generation, a player who can change any game in one moment.” “But football is not about names, it’s about condition, about readiness.” “If he is 100%, if he is fit, if he can help the team — then of course you want him on the pitch.” “But if there is risk, if he is not fully ready… then you must protect the player, even from himself.” “Because sometimes great players want to play at any cost. That is their mentality.” “My job is to think long-term, not just one match, not just one competition.” “And Neymar? A legend like him… must be on the pitch when he is truly ready, not just when emotions say so.” 🏆

🚨🎙️ Carlo Ancelotti RESPONDS to question on Neymar and the Cup: 🗣️ Reporter: “Are you REALLY sure you want this legend out of the Cup??” 🗣️ Ancelotti: “First of all… nobody ‘wants’ a player like Neymar out of anything.” “We are talking about one of the biggest talents of this generation, a player who can change any game in one moment.” “But football is not about names, it’s about condition, about readiness.” “If he is 100%, if he is fit, if he can help the team — then of course you want him on the pitch.” “But if there is risk, if he is not fully ready… then you must protect the player, even from himself.” “Because sometimes great players want to play at any cost. That is their mentality.” “My job is to think long-term, not just one match, not just one competition.” “And Neymar? A legend like him… must be on the pitch when he is truly ready, not just when emotions say so.” 🏆

AURAGOALX

956,752 views • 3 months ago

so as an ost freak i might be overthinking this but the ost that plays in rockie scene sounds so much like a brighter version of this and it’s so important to me bc one of those scenes is him being thrown at his face that he is different and the other is him finding out he is not

so as an ost freak i might be overthinking this but the ost that plays in rockie scene sounds so much like a brighter version of this and it’s so important to me bc one of those scenes is him being thrown at his face that he is different and the other is him finding out he is not

ɐuǝs | ST5 SPOILERS

39,814 views • 8 months ago

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Witsit

10,525 views • 1 year ago

[UNDER INVESTIGATION] An investigation is underway regarding an incident (with video circulated on various social media platforms) whereby a SAPS Constable allegedly assaulted a member of the public. The incident is said to have occurred on 02 April 2026, at the Volksrust Police Station. It is worth noting that in light of the serious allegation, the SAPS has instituted an internal investigation to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. In addition to the internal investigation, a criminal investigation is also underway to ensure all aspects of this matter are addressed transparently. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has been notified of the incident and it is expected that a parallel investigation will be conducted by this Directorate.

[UNDER INVESTIGATION] An investigation is underway regarding an incident (with video circulated on various social media platforms) whereby a SAPS Constable allegedly assaulted a member of the public. The incident is said to have occurred on 02 April 2026, at the Volksrust Police Station. It is worth noting that in light of the serious allegation, the SAPS has instituted an internal investigation to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. In addition to the internal investigation, a criminal investigation is also underway to ensure all aspects of this matter are addressed transparently. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has been notified of the incident and it is expected that a parallel investigation will be conducted by this Directorate.

Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

60,778 views • 4 months ago

My brother Mohammed has become an expert at starting fires, as if a flame inside him refuses to die out. He was supposed to be happy now, busy preparing for the start of a new school year, filled with dreams and ambitions for the future. But how could he, when there are no schools and no education in Gaza? The ongoing war, lasting for two whole years, has stolen two years of his childhood, two years of his life lost in destruction and fear. In that time, he has witnessed what no child on this planet should ever see… he has seen the very worst humanity could endure, all while being so young. And yet, what’s both astonishing and heartbreaking at the same time is that his smile still shines… It’s as if it’s a silent scream of defiance in the face of war, as if it’s saying: "You will not break us… we will keep dreaming, despite the pain." Mohammed is not alone; he is the face of an entire generation in Gaza, a generation forced to grow up before its time, a generation that has learned how to live on the edge of survival and plant joy in the desert of fear. Despite the fire, the siege, and the loss, his heart is still alive… and he still dares to dream.

My brother Mohammed has become an expert at starting fires, as if a flame inside him refuses to die out. He was supposed to be happy now, busy preparing for the start of a new school year, filled with dreams and ambitions for the future. But how could he, when there are no schools and no education in Gaza? The ongoing war, lasting for two whole years, has stolen two years of his childhood, two years of his life lost in destruction and fear. In that time, he has witnessed what no child on this planet should ever see… he has seen the very worst humanity could endure, all while being so young. And yet, what’s both astonishing and heartbreaking at the same time is that his smile still shines… It’s as if it’s a silent scream of defiance in the face of war, as if it’s saying: "You will not break us… we will keep dreaming, despite the pain." Mohammed is not alone; he is the face of an entire generation in Gaza, a generation forced to grow up before its time, a generation that has learned how to live on the edge of survival and plant joy in the desert of fear. Despite the fire, the siege, and the loss, his heart is still alive… and he still dares to dream.

Mahmoud Massri | مَحْمُود 🇵🇸

19,379 views • 11 months ago

what im about to say is just MY vision! this is how i see it i feel like the car in the mv represents heeseung himself and everything he has gone through over the years. in the mv, when he first got the car, it’s bright red. red symbolizes his passion, excitement, and happiness as he finally achieves the dream he had worked toward for so long. he has debuted, he is standing on stage and he is doing what he always wanted to do as the story progresses, the car becomes almost completely gray. i see this as a reflection of heeseung’s burnout and emotional exhaustion. the feeling of becoming drained after constantly giving so much of yourself without having enough time to recover. heeseung had dreams and desire to release his own solo music and show a different side of himself as an artist, but he wasn’t able to do it, he pushed it aside for a long time so he started losing hope. the fading color of the car mirrors how his passion and motivation were slowly being overshadowed by frustration and disappointment yet the car never becomes entirely gray. the driver’s door is still red. that remaining red represents the part of heeseung that refused to let go of his dreams and passion. no matter how exhausted he became, no matter how much disappointment he faced, there was still a small part of him that continued to believe that things could get better. the car is literally following heeseung and refusing to let go. i feel like it symbolizes the passion that survived even when everything else seemed to be fading away – the fully red car shows the joy of a dream coming true – the gray car shows the emotional cost of everything that came afterward – and the driver’s red door shows that no matter how difficult the journey became, he never completely lost himself that’s why i believe the car represents heeseung/his dreams

what im about to say is just MY vision! this is how i see it i feel like the car in the mv represents heeseung himself and everything he has gone through over the years. in the mv, when he first got the car, it’s bright red. red symbolizes his passion, excitement, and happiness as he finally achieves the dream he had worked toward for so long. he has debuted, he is standing on stage and he is doing what he always wanted to do as the story progresses, the car becomes almost completely gray. i see this as a reflection of heeseung’s burnout and emotional exhaustion. the feeling of becoming drained after constantly giving so much of yourself without having enough time to recover. heeseung had dreams and desire to release his own solo music and show a different side of himself as an artist, but he wasn’t able to do it, he pushed it aside for a long time so he started losing hope. the fading color of the car mirrors how his passion and motivation were slowly being overshadowed by frustration and disappointment yet the car never becomes entirely gray. the driver’s door is still red. that remaining red represents the part of heeseung that refused to let go of his dreams and passion. no matter how exhausted he became, no matter how much disappointment he faced, there was still a small part of him that continued to believe that things could get better. the car is literally following heeseung and refusing to let go. i feel like it symbolizes the passion that survived even when everything else seemed to be fading away – the fully red car shows the joy of a dream coming true – the gray car shows the emotional cost of everything that came afterward – and the driver’s red door shows that no matter how difficult the journey became, he never completely lost himself that’s why i believe the car represents heeseung/his dreams

ev.

50,766 views • 1 month ago

1/ In the early hrs of this morning, and in response to disturbances, Israeli police conducted a violent incursion into the East Jerusalem Palestinian neighborhood Kafr Aqab in East Jerusalem. There was a barrage of tear gas. There is one detail that is slightly problematic.

1/ In the early hrs of this morning, and in response to disturbances, Israeli police conducted a violent incursion into the East Jerusalem Palestinian neighborhood Kafr Aqab in East Jerusalem. There was a barrage of tear gas. There is one detail that is slightly problematic.

Daniel Seidemann

1,050,067 views • 2 years ago

The man who studied law has now become a “witness to its total collapse.” Professor Ghanem Al-Attar holds a PhD in International Constitutional Law. In a just world, he would be in a lecture hall shaping the minds of future jurists. Today, however, in the “open-air prison” of Gaza, he moves through the rubble just to find a gallon of water. This is the ultimate irony of 2026: the very international law he specialized in has failed to secure his most basic human rights—water and safety. When a professor of law is forced to live under unlawful bombardment, it is not merely a personal tragedy; it is a global constitutional crisis. We are not only losing buildings, we are wasting the greatest minds of an entire generation. 🙌⚖️

The man who studied law has now become a “witness to its total collapse.” Professor Ghanem Al-Attar holds a PhD in International Constitutional Law. In a just world, he would be in a lecture hall shaping the minds of future jurists. Today, however, in the “open-air prison” of Gaza, he moves through the rubble just to find a gallon of water. This is the ultimate irony of 2026: the very international law he specialized in has failed to secure his most basic human rights—water and safety. When a professor of law is forced to live under unlawful bombardment, it is not merely a personal tragedy; it is a global constitutional crisis. We are not only losing buildings, we are wasting the greatest minds of an entire generation. 🙌⚖️

Mahmoud Massri | مَحْمُود 🇵🇸

118,149 views • 4 months ago

#VarunDhawan: Today when you see someone like #AdityaDhar and how he's making it. #DavidDhawan: He is one of a kind. He is the one only. #VarunDhawan: But this is a director's triumph no? #DavidDhawan: Yes, definitely.

#VarunDhawan: Today when you see someone like #AdityaDhar and how he's making it. #DavidDhawan: He is one of a kind. He is the one only. #VarunDhawan: But this is a director's triumph no? #DavidDhawan: Yes, definitely.

$@M

21,702 views • 2 months ago

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them. Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady. Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion. This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form. The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through. Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer. Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce. Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with. They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online. The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had. That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own. Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts. What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them. Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady. Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion. This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form. The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through. Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer. Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce. Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with. They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online. The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had. That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own. Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts. What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?

SiriusB

443,240 views • 3 months ago

When an infielder makes a play where he is out of control, bounce the throw. This ensures the ball can be caught…The worst that can happen is the runner is safe at 1b and DP is still in play…trying to make the long perfect throw could lead to an overthrow or an in between hop

When an infielder makes a play where he is out of control, bounce the throw. This ensures the ball can be caught…The worst that can happen is the runner is safe at 1b and DP is still in play…trying to make the long perfect throw could lead to an overthrow or an in between hop

Perry Hill

22,706 views • 4 months ago

Kellen Moore is a big fan of Granderson and I understand why. This type of stuff jumps out immediately. Looks like his goal is to blow up the lead blocker. He not only takes the pulling RG & FB out of the play, he does it well enough that he just makes the tackle himself #Saints

Kellen Moore is a big fan of Granderson and I understand why. This type of stuff jumps out immediately. Looks like his goal is to blow up the lead blocker. He not only takes the pulling RG & FB out of the play, he does it well enough that he just makes the tackle himself #Saints

Jeff Nowak

19,995 views • 11 months ago

At some point when reviewing plays, the league should consider adding a speed threshold for anything involving the element of time. When you slow plays down to 1/100th the speed, it distorts what actually happened and makes it look like, in this case, Cooks possessed the ball for seconds prior to losing it. The game is not played in slow motion or frame by frame. For a catch: A) Secure control of the ball ✅ B) Two feet down in bounds ✅ C) After (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, clearly performs any act common to the game (e.g., extend the ball forward, take an additional step, tuck the ball away and turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so. C is where there is a judgement needed since A and B are clearly met. Now consider this note to the rule: If a player, who satisfied (a) and (b), but has not satisfied (c), contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is an incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground before he regains control, or if he regains control out of bounds. Because Cooks did lose control of the ball when he contacted the ground and the ball never contacted the ground, it was ruled an interception by Denver.

At some point when reviewing plays, the league should consider adding a speed threshold for anything involving the element of time. When you slow plays down to 1/100th the speed, it distorts what actually happened and makes it look like, in this case, Cooks possessed the ball for seconds prior to losing it. The game is not played in slow motion or frame by frame. For a catch: A) Secure control of the ball ✅ B) Two feet down in bounds ✅ C) After (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, clearly performs any act common to the game (e.g., extend the ball forward, take an additional step, tuck the ball away and turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so. C is where there is a judgement needed since A and B are clearly met. Now consider this note to the rule: If a player, who satisfied (a) and (b), but has not satisfied (c), contacts the ground and loses control of the ball, it is an incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground before he regains control, or if he regains control out of bounds. Because Cooks did lose control of the ball when he contacted the ground and the ball never contacted the ground, it was ruled an interception by Denver.

Gene Steratore

4,463,198 views • 6 months ago

Here is the play you are asking about from the Washington Nationals and Pittsburgh Pirates game, and this is correctly scored as just an RBI pop out and not a sacrifice fly. The only way you have a sacrifice fly caught by an infielder is if that infielder is running into the outfield. Here, Griffin is parallel, he is not running into the outfield. Yes, he is in the outfield, but running into the outfield means running away from home plate, and that is not the case here. Abrams does get an RBI for this, but it is not a sacrifice fly. #NATITUDE #LetsGoBucs

Here is the play you are asking about from the Washington Nationals and Pittsburgh Pirates game, and this is correctly scored as just an RBI pop out and not a sacrifice fly. The only way you have a sacrifice fly caught by an infielder is if that infielder is running into the outfield. Here, Griffin is parallel, he is not running into the outfield. Yes, he is in the outfield, but running into the outfield means running away from home plate, and that is not the case here. Abrams does get an RBI for this, but it is not a sacrifice fly. #NATITUDE #LetsGoBucs

MLB Scoring Changes

69,903 views • 1 month ago