Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇵🇸🇮🇱A scene from Jerusalem today that needs no explanation—only honesty: A Palestinian bus driver beaten and cursed by a group of settler kids, standing there unable to defend himself… not out of fear—out of certainty. He knows that if he lifts a finger to protect himself, within two seconds... he becomes: “a terrorist”… “an attacker”… “attempted stabbing”… “attempted ramming”… and the bullet is ready long before any “investigation.” In Jerusalem, the attacker is a protected settler child… and the victim is a Palestinian who must prove his innocence even when he is the one being beaten. This isn’t an incident. It’s a system: the aggressor is shielded, the assaulted is punished. This is how the city is run— and this is how the “law” looks when the law belongs to an occupier. Oppression doesn’t hide anymore… it hits in broad daylight, and everyone sees it.show more

SilencedSirs◼️

171,379 subscribers

106,614 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Sağlık & İyilik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Seconds before the de@th of a Brahmin man who was kiIIed and thrown in a farm field. His eyes were gauged out by the dozens of people. It is no less than the lynching. See how he is fighting for his life. Family contacted us and told the whole incident. They said that no one was helping them and no media was covering this incident. He is survived by two small kids. Thousands of such incidents go unnoticed. An incident from Madhya Pradesh.

Seconds before the de@th of a Brahmin man who was kiIIed and thrown in a farm field. His eyes were gauged out by the dozens of people. It is no less than the lynching. See how he is fighting for his life. Family contacted us and told the whole incident. They said that no one was helping them and no media was covering this incident. He is survived by two small kids. Thousands of such incidents go unnoticed. An incident from Madhya Pradesh.

Shubham Sharma

146,126 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

Jason Lavigne

34,521 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A Jewish rapper just released a song scolding a Palestinian for not loving Palestine correctly. That is what is happening on track four of Iceman, the first of three albums Drake dropped overnight. He goes after DJ Khaled for not being pro-Palestine enough. > “Your people are still waitin’ for a Free Palestine. But apparently, everything isn’t black and white and red and green.” Read it twice. There is no Gaza in the lyric. No mention of a single Palestinian besides Khaled himself. There is a Palestinian artist being publicly dressed down by a non-Palestinian for not performing his identity correctly. Khaled has stayed quiet on Gaza since October 7. In this climate, that is not betrayal. It is self-protection. Anything he says will get ripped apart by the loudest faction in the room. A Palestinian-American producer in Miami is allowed to live his life. What Drake is doing is the opposite of pro-Palestine. He has appointed himself the man who decides how Palestinians should behave in public. This is exactly what Kendrick was pointing at on “Not Like Us.” Drake doesn’t have an identity. He has a marketing department. He locates himself wherever the audience is loudest, and Free Palestine is the loudest audience right now. That’s the costume. The timing tells the rest. Kendrick called Drake a certified pedophile on the biggest song of 2024. Drake sued his label for defamation. He lost. Now he is back with three albums in a single drop, and the first political move he reaches for is “Free Palestine” deployed as ammunition against another artist. That is what celebrity image rehab looks like in 2026. Find a justice cause that is currently flattering. Wear it loud enough that the cause and your comeback blur into the same press cycle. Solidarity used to mean helping people. Now it means using them.

A Jewish rapper just released a song scolding a Palestinian for not loving Palestine correctly. That is what is happening on track four of Iceman, the first of three albums Drake dropped overnight. He goes after DJ Khaled for not being pro-Palestine enough. > “Your people are still waitin’ for a Free Palestine. But apparently, everything isn’t black and white and red and green.” Read it twice. There is no Gaza in the lyric. No mention of a single Palestinian besides Khaled himself. There is a Palestinian artist being publicly dressed down by a non-Palestinian for not performing his identity correctly. Khaled has stayed quiet on Gaza since October 7. In this climate, that is not betrayal. It is self-protection. Anything he says will get ripped apart by the loudest faction in the room. A Palestinian-American producer in Miami is allowed to live his life. What Drake is doing is the opposite of pro-Palestine. He has appointed himself the man who decides how Palestinians should behave in public. This is exactly what Kendrick was pointing at on “Not Like Us.” Drake doesn’t have an identity. He has a marketing department. He locates himself wherever the audience is loudest, and Free Palestine is the loudest audience right now. That’s the costume. The timing tells the rest. Kendrick called Drake a certified pedophile on the biggest song of 2024. Drake sued his label for defamation. He lost. Now he is back with three albums in a single drop, and the first political move he reaches for is “Free Palestine” deployed as ammunition against another artist. That is what celebrity image rehab looks like in 2026. Find a justice cause that is currently flattering. Wear it loud enough that the cause and your comeback blur into the same press cycle. Solidarity used to mean helping people. Now it means using them.

Hen Mazzig

68,547 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

there is a driver on the wall, he is still inside his car after a moment and his car is still rolling forwards at the fastest section of the circuit the outrage is about how egregious it is that this was deemed a “single yellow” in the first place when it should’ve been a red.

there is a driver on the wall, he is still inside his car after a moment and his car is still rolling forwards at the fastest section of the circuit the outrage is about how egregious it is that this was deemed a “single yellow” in the first place when it should’ve been a red.

d。

285,142 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I felt sad seeing the 90 year old Duke of Kent being ill-treated, excluded & humiliated like this. This is an old man who is literally working to his death on behalf of a family that doesn’t care a single jolt about him. Watch how they all stand on one side leaving him out there by himself. He tries to interact with them and they completely ignore him as if he doesn’t exist. This is elder abuse and shows the cold institution that is the royal family.

I felt sad seeing the 90 year old Duke of Kent being ill-treated, excluded & humiliated like this. This is an old man who is literally working to his death on behalf of a family that doesn’t care a single jolt about him. Watch how they all stand on one side leaving him out there by himself. He tries to interact with them and they completely ignore him as if he doesn’t exist. This is elder abuse and shows the cold institution that is the royal family.

Senior Lieutenant Zandi Sussex

106,132 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🎙️ Carlo Ancelotti RESPONDS to question on Neymar and the Cup: 🗣️ Reporter: “Are you REALLY sure you want this legend out of the Cup??” 🗣️ Ancelotti: “First of all… nobody ‘wants’ a player like Neymar out of anything.” “We are talking about one of the biggest talents of this generation, a player who can change any game in one moment.” “But football is not about names, it’s about condition, about readiness.” “If he is 100%, if he is fit, if he can help the team — then of course you want him on the pitch.” “But if there is risk, if he is not fully ready… then you must protect the player, even from himself.” “Because sometimes great players want to play at any cost. That is their mentality.” “My job is to think long-term, not just one match, not just one competition.” “And Neymar? A legend like him… must be on the pitch when he is truly ready, not just when emotions say so.” 🏆

🚨🎙️ Carlo Ancelotti RESPONDS to question on Neymar and the Cup: 🗣️ Reporter: “Are you REALLY sure you want this legend out of the Cup??” 🗣️ Ancelotti: “First of all… nobody ‘wants’ a player like Neymar out of anything.” “We are talking about one of the biggest talents of this generation, a player who can change any game in one moment.” “But football is not about names, it’s about condition, about readiness.” “If he is 100%, if he is fit, if he can help the team — then of course you want him on the pitch.” “But if there is risk, if he is not fully ready… then you must protect the player, even from himself.” “Because sometimes great players want to play at any cost. That is their mentality.” “My job is to think long-term, not just one match, not just one competition.” “And Neymar? A legend like him… must be on the pitch when he is truly ready, not just when emotions say so.” 🏆

AURAGOALX

956,752 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

so as an ost freak i might be overthinking this but the ost that plays in rockie scene sounds so much like a brighter version of this and it’s so important to me bc one of those scenes is him being thrown at his face that he is different and the other is him finding out he is not

so as an ost freak i might be overthinking this but the ost that plays in rockie scene sounds so much like a brighter version of this and it’s so important to me bc one of those scenes is him being thrown at his face that he is different and the other is him finding out he is not

ɐuǝs | ST5 SPOILERS

39,814 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

[UNDER INVESTIGATION] An investigation is underway regarding an incident (with video circulated on various social media platforms) whereby a SAPS Constable allegedly assaulted a member of the public. The incident is said to have occurred on 02 April 2026, at the Volksrust Police Station. It is worth noting that in light of the serious allegation, the SAPS has instituted an internal investigation to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. In addition to the internal investigation, a criminal investigation is also underway to ensure all aspects of this matter are addressed transparently. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has been notified of the incident and it is expected that a parallel investigation will be conducted by this Directorate.

[UNDER INVESTIGATION] An investigation is underway regarding an incident (with video circulated on various social media platforms) whereby a SAPS Constable allegedly assaulted a member of the public. The incident is said to have occurred on 02 April 2026, at the Volksrust Police Station. It is worth noting that in light of the serious allegation, the SAPS has instituted an internal investigation to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the incident. In addition to the internal investigation, a criminal investigation is also underway to ensure all aspects of this matter are addressed transparently. The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) has been notified of the incident and it is expected that a parallel investigation will be conducted by this Directorate.

Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

60,778 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

what im about to say is just MY vision! this is how i see it i feel like the car in the mv represents heeseung himself and everything he has gone through over the years. in the mv, when he first got the car, it’s bright red. red symbolizes his passion, excitement, and happiness as he finally achieves the dream he had worked toward for so long. he has debuted, he is standing on stage and he is doing what he always wanted to do as the story progresses, the car becomes almost completely gray. i see this as a reflection of heeseung’s burnout and emotional exhaustion. the feeling of becoming drained after constantly giving so much of yourself without having enough time to recover. heeseung had dreams and desire to release his own solo music and show a different side of himself as an artist, but he wasn’t able to do it, he pushed it aside for a long time so he started losing hope. the fading color of the car mirrors how his passion and motivation were slowly being overshadowed by frustration and disappointment yet the car never becomes entirely gray. the driver’s door is still red. that remaining red represents the part of heeseung that refused to let go of his dreams and passion. no matter how exhausted he became, no matter how much disappointment he faced, there was still a small part of him that continued to believe that things could get better. the car is literally following heeseung and refusing to let go. i feel like it symbolizes the passion that survived even when everything else seemed to be fading away – the fully red car shows the joy of a dream coming true – the gray car shows the emotional cost of everything that came afterward – and the driver’s red door shows that no matter how difficult the journey became, he never completely lost himself that’s why i believe the car represents heeseung/his dreams

what im about to say is just MY vision! this is how i see it i feel like the car in the mv represents heeseung himself and everything he has gone through over the years. in the mv, when he first got the car, it’s bright red. red symbolizes his passion, excitement, and happiness as he finally achieves the dream he had worked toward for so long. he has debuted, he is standing on stage and he is doing what he always wanted to do as the story progresses, the car becomes almost completely gray. i see this as a reflection of heeseung’s burnout and emotional exhaustion. the feeling of becoming drained after constantly giving so much of yourself without having enough time to recover. heeseung had dreams and desire to release his own solo music and show a different side of himself as an artist, but he wasn’t able to do it, he pushed it aside for a long time so he started losing hope. the fading color of the car mirrors how his passion and motivation were slowly being overshadowed by frustration and disappointment yet the car never becomes entirely gray. the driver’s door is still red. that remaining red represents the part of heeseung that refused to let go of his dreams and passion. no matter how exhausted he became, no matter how much disappointment he faced, there was still a small part of him that continued to believe that things could get better. the car is literally following heeseung and refusing to let go. i feel like it symbolizes the passion that survived even when everything else seemed to be fading away – the fully red car shows the joy of a dream coming true – the gray car shows the emotional cost of everything that came afterward – and the driver’s red door shows that no matter how difficult the journey became, he never completely lost himself that’s why i believe the car represents heeseung/his dreams

ev.

50,766 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

1/ In the early hrs of this morning, and in response to disturbances, Israeli police conducted a violent incursion into the East Jerusalem Palestinian neighborhood Kafr Aqab in East Jerusalem. There was a barrage of tear gas. There is one detail that is slightly problematic.

1/ In the early hrs of this morning, and in response to disturbances, Israeli police conducted a violent incursion into the East Jerusalem Palestinian neighborhood Kafr Aqab in East Jerusalem. There was a barrage of tear gas. There is one detail that is slightly problematic.

Daniel Seidemann

1,050,067 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Tbh kpop stans calling Jiyong a druggie is just dumb, he was a victim of one of the biggest witch hunts in korea but was strong enough to face everyone and prove his innocence, he also looked cool doing it, trust me it’s not the insult they think it is.

Tbh kpop stans calling Jiyong a druggie is just dumb, he was a victim of one of the biggest witch hunts in korea but was strong enough to face everyone and prove his innocence, he also looked cool doing it, trust me it’s not the insult they think it is.

🥀

27,766 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Although this is an obvious improvement, it is still unconstitutional. A license/permit is permission to engage in an activity that would otherwise be unlawful. Concealing a firearm is protected under the Second Amendment. Thus, any law infringing upon that right is facially invalid and can be disregarded as such. When faced with an unconstitutional law, you "may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right" which the law infringes upon. See 𝘚𝘩𝘶𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘩 𝘷. 𝘊𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘉𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘮.

Witsit

10,521 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

When an infielder makes a play where he is out of control, bounce the throw. This ensures the ball can be caught…The worst that can happen is the runner is safe at 1b and DP is still in play…trying to make the long perfect throw could lead to an overthrow or an in between hop

When an infielder makes a play where he is out of control, bounce the throw. This ensures the ball can be caught…The worst that can happen is the runner is safe at 1b and DP is still in play…trying to make the long perfect throw could lead to an overthrow or an in between hop

Perry Hill

22,706 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them. Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady. Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion. This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form. The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through. Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer. Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce. Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with. They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online. The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had. That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own. Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts. What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them. Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady. Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion. This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form. The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through. Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer. Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce. Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with. They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online. The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had. That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own. Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts. What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?

SiriusB

442,795 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

My brother Mohammed has become an expert at starting fires, as if a flame inside him refuses to die out. He was supposed to be happy now, busy preparing for the start of a new school year, filled with dreams and ambitions for the future. But how could he, when there are no schools and no education in Gaza? The ongoing war, lasting for two whole years, has stolen two years of his childhood, two years of his life lost in destruction and fear. In that time, he has witnessed what no child on this planet should ever see… he has seen the very worst humanity could endure, all while being so young. And yet, what’s both astonishing and heartbreaking at the same time is that his smile still shines… It’s as if it’s a silent scream of defiance in the face of war, as if it’s saying: "You will not break us… we will keep dreaming, despite the pain." Mohammed is not alone; he is the face of an entire generation in Gaza, a generation forced to grow up before its time, a generation that has learned how to live on the edge of survival and plant joy in the desert of fear. Despite the fire, the siege, and the loss, his heart is still alive… and he still dares to dream.

My brother Mohammed has become an expert at starting fires, as if a flame inside him refuses to die out. He was supposed to be happy now, busy preparing for the start of a new school year, filled with dreams and ambitions for the future. But how could he, when there are no schools and no education in Gaza? The ongoing war, lasting for two whole years, has stolen two years of his childhood, two years of his life lost in destruction and fear. In that time, he has witnessed what no child on this planet should ever see… he has seen the very worst humanity could endure, all while being so young. And yet, what’s both astonishing and heartbreaking at the same time is that his smile still shines… It’s as if it’s a silent scream of defiance in the face of war, as if it’s saying: "You will not break us… we will keep dreaming, despite the pain." Mohammed is not alone; he is the face of an entire generation in Gaza, a generation forced to grow up before its time, a generation that has learned how to live on the edge of survival and plant joy in the desert of fear. Despite the fire, the siege, and the loss, his heart is still alive… and he still dares to dream.

Mahmoud Massri | مَحْمُود 🇵🇸

19,379 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

#VarunDhawan: Today when you see someone like #AdityaDhar and how he's making it. #DavidDhawan: He is one of a kind. He is the one only. #VarunDhawan: But this is a director's triumph no? #DavidDhawan: Yes, definitely.

#VarunDhawan: Today when you see someone like #AdityaDhar and how he's making it. #DavidDhawan: He is one of a kind. He is the one only. #VarunDhawan: But this is a director's triumph no? #DavidDhawan: Yes, definitely.

$@M

21,702 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The man who studied law has now become a “witness to its total collapse.” Professor Ghanem Al-Attar holds a PhD in International Constitutional Law. In a just world, he would be in a lecture hall shaping the minds of future jurists. Today, however, in the “open-air prison” of Gaza, he moves through the rubble just to find a gallon of water. This is the ultimate irony of 2026: the very international law he specialized in has failed to secure his most basic human rights—water and safety. When a professor of law is forced to live under unlawful bombardment, it is not merely a personal tragedy; it is a global constitutional crisis. We are not only losing buildings, we are wasting the greatest minds of an entire generation. 🙌⚖️

The man who studied law has now become a “witness to its total collapse.” Professor Ghanem Al-Attar holds a PhD in International Constitutional Law. In a just world, he would be in a lecture hall shaping the minds of future jurists. Today, however, in the “open-air prison” of Gaza, he moves through the rubble just to find a gallon of water. This is the ultimate irony of 2026: the very international law he specialized in has failed to secure his most basic human rights—water and safety. When a professor of law is forced to live under unlawful bombardment, it is not merely a personal tragedy; it is a global constitutional crisis. We are not only losing buildings, we are wasting the greatest minds of an entire generation. 🙌⚖️

Mahmoud Massri | مَحْمُود 🇵🇸

118,125 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Modi is to India what Nero was to Rome. When Rome was burning, its emperor - Nero - wasn’t even there. Similarly, Narendra Modi is rarely there, where he is needed. India is facing an energy crisis, but instead of helping the nation solve this problem, he is busy pleading for votes while indulging in baseless and frivolous propaganda to suggest that there is no energy crisis. Incapable of offering a solution, all he provides is shameless denial. But the distressed faces, the long queues, and the shuttered restaurants across India tell a very different - and far grimmer - story. India needs a leader, not a dealer who becomes a mute spectator, in crisis.

Modi is to India what Nero was to Rome. When Rome was burning, its emperor - Nero - wasn’t even there. Similarly, Narendra Modi is rarely there, where he is needed. India is facing an energy crisis, but instead of helping the nation solve this problem, he is busy pleading for votes while indulging in baseless and frivolous propaganda to suggest that there is no energy crisis. Incapable of offering a solution, all he provides is shameless denial. But the distressed faces, the long queues, and the shuttered restaurants across India tell a very different - and far grimmer - story. India needs a leader, not a dealer who becomes a mute spectator, in crisis.

Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 ಪವನ್ ಖೇರಾ

74,305 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

OSINT: This bandit who is also part of the Kachalla Maha group, is seen using a slant bicycle to sit on a kidnapped victim abducted by him. Meanwhile, the terrorists also put out a photo of himself and his kid on Tiktok. The app is an Open Source Intelligence hub.

OSINT: This bandit who is also part of the Kachalla Maha group, is seen using a slant bicycle to sit on a kidnapped victim abducted by him. Meanwhile, the terrorists also put out a photo of himself and his kid on Tiktok. The app is an Open Source Intelligence hub.

Mobilisingnigerians™

370,275 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

I’ve seen a lot of people accuse Saudi Arabia of fabricating the moon sighting. Below is proof that it wasn’t. The first video is the exact moment the moon was sighted. The second video is the official testifying before a judge about the set up and what he saw exactly. He says "At 6:11pm (precisely) we saw an opening in the sky, and we all saw the moon and around the opening was all clouds" There is also a picture but it is against the Sunnah to share proof when a testimony is given by a Muslim so I refuse to share it in case we set a precedent to always share a picture and that would be a big error. A testimony of a Muslim is enough as we see from the Hadith of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم It was narrated that Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه said: A Bedouin came to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم and said, I have seen the new moon tonight. He said, "Do you bear witness that there is no god except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah?" He said, Yes. He said, "Get up, O Bilaal, and announce to the people that they should fast tomorrow." [at Tirmidhi: 691 Abu Dawood: [2340], an Nasaa'i: [2112] Ibn Maajah: [1652]. Shaykh al Albaani رحمه الله said: So we see from the Hadith that he, صلى الله عليه وسلم، instructed Bilaal to announce to the people that they would fast the next day. So the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was content with the testimony of this man, whom he did not know, on the basis that he bore witness that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, i.e. he knew that he was a Muslim, but he did not check on him any further and he did not try to find out how intelligent and smart he was, as was the case in the first Hadith in which the witness was 'Abd Allah ibn 'Umar ibn al Khattab رضي الله عنه. Yet despite that he accepted his testimony. This Hadith makes things easier for people, and what this means is that the judge should be content with the witness as he appears to be, without needing to find people who know this man and can testify that he is of good character, as was the habit of judges since time immemorial. Rather it is sufficient to know that he is a Muslim. This man was a Bedouin of whom the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم had no prior knowledge and he was content that he uttered the Shahaadatayn before him. So he was a Muslim with the same rights and duties as any other, and based on his testimony and the fact that he was a Muslim he said: O Bilaal, announced to the people that they should fast tomorrow. [At Ta laaq 'ala Kitaab Bulugh al Maraam, (audio tape), Hadith 5, Kitaab al Siyaam] This Hadith is evidence for the principle that a Muslim is to be regarded as being of good character unless proven otherwise. Al San'aani رحمه الله said concerning what we learn from the hadeeth of Ibn 'Abbaas رضي الله عنه: It indicates that the basic principle with regard to the Muslims is that they are of good character, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم did not ask the Bedouin for anything except the Shahaadah. [Subul as Salaam by as San'aani: 2/153] And Allah knows best.

ابن البخاري

245,087 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce