正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

A ​security guarantee for Ukraine would be a positive step, and the unanimity with Europe that we saw at the White House yesterday gives us leverage over Putin. But Ukraine cannot afford to lay down its arms on the strength of a piece of paper. Any security assurance must...

30,986 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇺🇦🇺🇸@SecDef Pete Hegseth outlined U.S. defense policy towards Ukraine: "We want, like you, a sovereign and prosperous Ukraine. But we must start by recognizing that returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic objective. Chasing this illusionary goal will only prolong the war and cause more suffering. A durable peace for Ukraine must include robust security guarantees to ensure that the war will not begin again. This must not be Minsk 3.0. That said, the United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement. Instead, any security guarantee must be backed by capable European and non-European troops. If these troops are deployed as peacekeepers to Ukraine, at any point, they should be deployed as part of a non-NATO mission, and they should not be covered under Article Five. There also must be robust international oversight of the line of contact. To be clear: as part of any security guarantee, there will not be US troops deployed to Ukraine. To further enable effective diplomacy and drive down energy prices that fund the Russian war machine, President Trump is unleashing American energy production and encouraging other nations to do the same. Lower energy prices, coupled with more effective enforcement of energy sanctions will help bring Russia to the table. Safeguarding European security must be an imperative for European members of NATO as part of this Europe must provide the overwhelming share of future lethal and non-lethal aid to Ukraine. Members of this contact group must meet the moment. "

Saint Javelin

403,716 次观看 • 1 年前