Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A serial cat abuser caught by citizens, not by any functioning legal system from #CCP! This is true face of #China under #Xi: utter moral decay, where basic compassion is absent and cruelty thrives without consequence. Disgusting. 1/4 ⭐️MIYABI⭐️ 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra

NadiaMo33's profile picture

Nadia Mohammad

1,839 subscribers

50,258 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaHayvanlar#CCP#China#Xi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Nadia Mohammad profil fotoğrafı
Nadia Mohammad1 yıl önce

While #Xitler boasts of a "civilized" #China, its citizens are torturing animals for sport & posting it online. Animal lovers are forced to be vigilantes because the #CCP provides NO laws to protect the voiceless. Shameful and barbaric. #ChinaAnimalCruelty 2/4

Nadia Mohammad profil fotoğrafı
Nadia Mohammad1 yıl önce

The CCP cares more about surveilling its own people than protecting innocent animals from depraved torturers. This isn't just about one abuser; it's a reflection of a regime that tolerates brutality and lacks fundamental human decency. #ChinaShame 3/4

Nadia Mohammad profil fotoğrafı
Nadia Mohammad1 yıl önce

So much for the "harmonious society" Xi Jinping preaches! When animal lovers have to hunt down torturers themselves, it exposes the CCP's grotesque indifference to suffering. A regime that permits such cruelty is rotten to its core. #AnimalAbuseChina 4/4

Meow Guardian profil fotoğrafı
Meow Guardian1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @hexenbeest @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic Thank you all of you who are working so hard to protect these innocent little souls. We will keep fighting for it. Till the action takes place.

viva🪔 profil fotoğrafı
viva🪔1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @hexenbeest @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic These people are so brave! This beast of a man deserves to be confronted with the same violence. Why would he think it is acceptable and appropriate for him to torture Chinese cats? He wouldn’t like if someone did that to him so why do it to others even if they are cats? THANK U!

A Velvet Paw 🐾 🕉 ☮️ 🌱#FBPE profil fotoğrafı
A Velvet Paw 🐾 🕉 ☮️ 🌱#FBPE1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic Can anyone translate what is being said in the video? He doesn't look very scared, almost confused as to why he's being treated this way! Anyway, well done to those people. May their vigilante group grow bigger faster, then maybe Xi will sit up and realise *this* is civilisation.

Sally&Le‘a&Noah🇯🇵 profil fotoğrafı
Sally&Le‘a&Noah🇯🇵1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @hexenbeest @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic こんな奴は殺せ

₿ - Hartes Geld 🏴‍☠️🟠 profil fotoğrafı
₿ - Hartes Geld 🏴‍☠️🟠1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @hexenbeest @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic Why that roach is still alive??

BrothersOfTheWorld profil fotoğrafı
BrothersOfTheWorld1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @hexenbeest @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic Attention! Normal people exist in China!

コロコロ profil fotoğrafı
コロコロ1 yıl önce

@miyachan_373 @mama00007777 @PhaedraXTeddy @2021Telmo @420budsman420 @TafPomScotiPole @VTornari @CBastinck @hexenbeest @calendula_3 @aka_matthias88 @DogsofYulin @MMMDimitrijevic 市民の皆様ご苦労様です🙇 政府、モタモタしないで早く動いて下さい🤛

Benzer Videolar

#Wuhan Horror... #CCP's Cruelty Culture Exposed! Another unspeakable act of animal cruelty in #China. An "evil old man" in Wuhan brutally stomps a defenseless kitten. #AnimalAbuse #AnimalCruelty 1/3 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) ⭐️MIYABI⭐️ bb Phaedra @two_squid64229 Tricotte19
0:51

#Wuhan Horror... #CCP's Cruelty Culture Exposed! Another unspeakable act of animal cruelty in #China. An "evil old man" in Wuhan brutally stomps a defenseless kitten. #AnimalAbuse #AnimalCruelty 1/3 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) ⭐️MIYABI⭐️ bb Phaedra @two_squid64229 Tricotte19

Nadia Mohammad

57,125 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Evil doesn’t only dwell in dictatorships like the CCP regime of China—it walks among us, disguised as humans, committing cruelty daily. 1/4 #StopCruelty United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 Ev Edward2 Phaedra 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) @_DOGPOOL_ Power Broker Ayfer Levent 🌸🌻🪻FLOREBO QU0QUMCUE FERAR carla maloney
0:20

Evil doesn’t only dwell in dictatorships like the CCP regime of China—it walks among us, disguised as humans, committing cruelty daily. 1/4 #StopCruelty United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 Ev Edward2 Phaedra 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) @_DOGPOOL_ Power Broker Ayfer Levent 🌸🌻🪻FLOREBO QU0QUMCUE FERAR carla maloney

Mark Roberts

124,961 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The poor caged dog was shivering and shaking out of fear! The CCP police have an additional duty to perform besides controlling and surveillance of the Chinese people They have to help dog butchers catch dogs! #boycottChina 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra
0:29

The poor caged dog was shivering and shaking out of fear! The CCP police have an additional duty to perform besides controlling and surveillance of the Chinese people They have to help dog butchers catch dogs! #boycottChina 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra

Mark Roberts

49,326 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Chinese are really psychopathic subhuman beings, why are they hurting the poor puppies and kittens wherever they go? The puppies and kittens, how can anyone develop hate and bad thoughts towards them? 1/3 #BoycottChina 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra
0:42

Chinese are really psychopathic subhuman beings, why are they hurting the poor puppies and kittens wherever they go? The puppies and kittens, how can anyone develop hate and bad thoughts towards them? 1/3 #BoycottChina 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra

Mark Roberts

20,840 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

China shows off smart cities and 5G—but in the countryside, horses are still doing the work tractors should. Modernity for the elite, labor for the old-fashioned. 1/4 #BoycottChina 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra αTYGER Ⓥ 🇺🇸 Ev Edward2 United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 @Thenina77
0:54

China shows off smart cities and 5G—but in the countryside, horses are still doing the work tractors should. Modernity for the elite, labor for the old-fashioned. 1/4 #BoycottChina 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra αTYGER Ⓥ 🇺🇸 Ev Edward2 United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 @Thenina77

Mark Roberts

34,911 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

China’s 5G towers shine, while horses still carry heavy loads or plow its fields—progress for the elite, slavery for the rest.1/4 #BoycottChina #StopCruelty 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra αTYGER Ⓥ 🇺🇸 Ev Edward2 United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 @Thenina77 carolyn walker CNAnimalRightsAlert
0:22

China’s 5G towers shine, while horses still carry heavy loads or plow its fields—progress for the elite, slavery for the rest.1/4 #BoycottChina #StopCruelty 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra αTYGER Ⓥ 🇺🇸 Ev Edward2 United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 @Thenina77 carolyn walker CNAnimalRightsAlert

Mark Roberts

21,573 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

These scumbs learn to inflict suffering at an early age. I feel pity and compassion for such subhuman beings. #StopBadManner #Kids #SpreadLove United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 Ev Edward2 @_DOGPOOL_ M. Alan Kazlev Ayfer Levent 🌸🌻🪻FLOREBO QU0QUMCUE FERAR carla maloney 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra
0:20

These scumbs learn to inflict suffering at an early age. I feel pity and compassion for such subhuman beings. #StopBadManner #Kids #SpreadLove United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 Ev Edward2 @_DOGPOOL_ M. Alan Kazlev Ayfer Levent 🌸🌻🪻FLOREBO QU0QUMCUE FERAR carla maloney 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra

Mark Roberts

611,123 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

A poor horse, limping and bleeding, still chained to a cart twice its size. And the humans? shouting, pretending not to see the pain right in front of them. #AnimalRights 1/3 United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 Ev Edward2 Phaedra 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Ayfer Levent 🌸🌻🪻FLOREBO QU0QUMCUE FERAR Bea Carla Couto 🇵🇹
0:20

A poor horse, limping and bleeding, still chained to a cart twice its size. And the humans? shouting, pretending not to see the pain right in front of them. #AnimalRights 1/3 United vegetables🐐🌿🌾 Ev Edward2 Phaedra 【公式】🍡ふくママ🍡(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Ayfer Levent 🌸🌻🪻FLOREBO QU0QUMCUE FERAR Bea Carla Couto 🇵🇹

Mark Roberts

114,719 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

China & its allies often boasts about its rapid development and high-tech infrastructure. But look closer — in many rural areas, horses are still the backbone of heavy labor, hauling loads where machines should be. #BoycottChina 【公式】ふくママ(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra Stronger Together🟧☮️🏳️‍🌈❤️🌟🇺🇸🌻
1:08

China & its allies often boasts about its rapid development and high-tech infrastructure. But look closer — in many rural areas, horses are still the backbone of heavy labor, hauling loads where machines should be. #BoycottChina 【公式】ふくママ(アニマル専門西洋レイキヒーラーバカボンママなのだ) Phaedra Stronger Together🟧☮️🏳️‍🌈❤️🌟🇺🇸🌻

Mark Roberts

40,607 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨🇨🇩 ON THE GROUND: CONGO – INSIDE THE CITY OF BULLETS AND BILLIONS PART 1 This is the broken spine of Central Africa — where war-torn roads cut through lava, memory, and the graves no one talks about. In Part 1, On the Ground goes deep into a land mined with minerals and menace—where the ground leaks coltan, cobalt, and blood. Where factions rise and vanish with the rain. Where staying alive is resistance. We sit with AFC/M23 leaders in the shadows, marked by Kinshasa and branded by war. They speak of the slaughter no one films. The beliefs no one touches. And what it means to rebuild when the world turns its back. This isn’t a story of sides. It’s a story of power—raw, buried, and weaponized. We crossed dead airstrips. Followed roads erased from memory. And what we uncovered wasn’t just a war. It was a country trying to find hope… and a sense of normalcy. This is On The Ground. Hosted by 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 and reported by Visegrád 24 00:54 — “The soil bleeds for our phones.” Coltan, cobalt, gold—extracted at a human cost. 01:18 — “This land was made poor.” Empire, abandonment, and the myth of Congo’s poverty. 02:02 — “We’re not here to observe.” Rebels, checkpoints, and civilians caught in the middle. 03:25 — “This is not a report.” A child’s life raft is medicine. A vendor survives on scraps. 04:52 — “We trusted Tshisekedi. He betrayed us.” AFC/M23’s rise from broken promises and persecution. 05:59 — “They barbecued our people.” Massacres ignored by the world and erased by the media. 07:50 — “Congo was never a state.” Still ruled by colonial ghosts, still without a functioning system. 08:39 — “We brought water in a week.” Rebel governance delivers what the state never could. 11:13 — “We clean our city—together.” Civic pride despite conflict. 13:21 — “The revolution never ends.” Change is a burden, not a banner. 14:57 — “They can kill me, but not the story.” Hope persists even under threat. 20:37 — “We’re not at your level—yet.” A message to the West: don’t judge—listen. 21:03 — “$24 trillion underfoot. $2 a day to survive.” The tragedy of Congo in numbers. 22:05 — “No lens. No spin. Just truth.” This is On the Ground.
22:21

🚨🇨🇩 ON THE GROUND: CONGO – INSIDE THE CITY OF BULLETS AND BILLIONS PART 1 This is the broken spine of Central Africa — where war-torn roads cut through lava, memory, and the graves no one talks about. In Part 1, On the Ground goes deep into a land mined with minerals and menace—where the ground leaks coltan, cobalt, and blood. Where factions rise and vanish with the rain. Where staying alive is resistance. We sit with AFC/M23 leaders in the shadows, marked by Kinshasa and branded by war. They speak of the slaughter no one films. The beliefs no one touches. And what it means to rebuild when the world turns its back. This isn’t a story of sides. It’s a story of power—raw, buried, and weaponized. We crossed dead airstrips. Followed roads erased from memory. And what we uncovered wasn’t just a war. It was a country trying to find hope… and a sense of normalcy. This is On The Ground. Hosted by 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 and reported by Visegrád 24 00:54 — “The soil bleeds for our phones.” Coltan, cobalt, gold—extracted at a human cost. 01:18 — “This land was made poor.” Empire, abandonment, and the myth of Congo’s poverty. 02:02 — “We’re not here to observe.” Rebels, checkpoints, and civilians caught in the middle. 03:25 — “This is not a report.” A child’s life raft is medicine. A vendor survives on scraps. 04:52 — “We trusted Tshisekedi. He betrayed us.” AFC/M23’s rise from broken promises and persecution. 05:59 — “They barbecued our people.” Massacres ignored by the world and erased by the media. 07:50 — “Congo was never a state.” Still ruled by colonial ghosts, still without a functioning system. 08:39 — “We brought water in a week.” Rebel governance delivers what the state never could. 11:13 — “We clean our city—together.” Civic pride despite conflict. 13:21 — “The revolution never ends.” Change is a burden, not a banner. 14:57 — “They can kill me, but not the story.” Hope persists even under threat. 20:37 — “We’re not at your level—yet.” A message to the West: don’t judge—listen. 21:03 — “$24 trillion underfoot. $2 a day to survive.” The tragedy of Congo in numbers. 22:05 — “No lens. No spin. Just truth.” This is On the Ground.

Mario Nawfal

2,434,783 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large." "Scotland is annexed, a dominion under the English crown. And it is the English crown, not the fictional UK crown, that we're all told about. "Not a partner, not of any kind. In fact, the whole partnership story is a concoction fashioned to convince the world that Scots are part of a joint state and to disguise the fact that Scotland is, in reality, nothing other than a colony. "It's not a partner in a marriage, but a kidnap victim. And you do not escape from a kidnapper by filing for divorce from a fictional marriage. "Second, even if it were possible to break free through a referendum or an election, or to propose any other route that would be approved as lawful by the kidnapping state, the political system in Scotland would not guarantee any of the things that sing in our bones as Scots. We dream of justice, compassion, equality, prosperity and care for all without preference or privilege. "But what we have is an english system of concentrated power and privilege, which those Scots who enjoy it will not give up easily. Where the government sits in authority over the people, and the people surrender their hopes, their ambitions and their human and civil rights to the whims of their elected representatives. Where all that we hold dear, all that we depend on for decency, fairness and security, depends on the honor, honesty and good faith of those elected. "Because once it is elected, we have no means of curbing, challenging or preventing anything a government may choose to do, whether or not that's lawful, just, rational or humane. "Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large. Our helplessness in the face of the state marching side by side with destitution and despair. "This is why liberation was born. Because the route to the Scotland we dream of neither can nor will come through the present political system, but through the restoration of the political, territorial and judicial rights, the constitutional provisions that belong to the people of this nation, in law and in justice, even under the terms of this fraudulent union, and certainly under international law. "They mean that we, the people, are sovereign, in fact, not in sound bite, the ultimate authority of this nation of Scotland. "They mean that the interests of the people, collectively known as the common good, are not only the primary purpose of government, but the only condition on which it's permitted to exist. "They mean that we are entitled to overrule, remove or replace a government that violates that condition of its existence, that fails to honour its promises, to consult the people or to act according to their wishes and welfare. "And in the modern world, that means the right to all the mechanisms that we see in a nation like Switzerland, which will make that sovereign power a reality. "All this is part of what we call decolonization, true Scottish self determination. And it is the soul and purpose of liberation Scotland. "Impossible? Other nations have trodden the path to decolonisation. Not one has bowed to the kidnapper and asked for permission. "We know now that we can gain our independence as a state by first gaining independence from a colonizing power. So that instead of waiting to reclaim real sovereignty of the people after independence, we gain our independence by first reclaiming our sovereign Scottish rights. "The next step on this road is establishing the committee of the Scottish Liberation Movement. This committee will be elected from the membership of Liberation and will operate under a ratified constitution. "And it will register Scotland's Liberation Movement with the United Nations." Sara Salyers @TheScotCongress Iain.lawson27 Salvo.Scot Colette Walker
4:19

"Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large." "Scotland is annexed, a dominion under the English crown. And it is the English crown, not the fictional UK crown, that we're all told about. "Not a partner, not of any kind. In fact, the whole partnership story is a concoction fashioned to convince the world that Scots are part of a joint state and to disguise the fact that Scotland is, in reality, nothing other than a colony. "It's not a partner in a marriage, but a kidnap victim. And you do not escape from a kidnapper by filing for divorce from a fictional marriage. "Second, even if it were possible to break free through a referendum or an election, or to propose any other route that would be approved as lawful by the kidnapping state, the political system in Scotland would not guarantee any of the things that sing in our bones as Scots. We dream of justice, compassion, equality, prosperity and care for all without preference or privilege. "But what we have is an english system of concentrated power and privilege, which those Scots who enjoy it will not give up easily. Where the government sits in authority over the people, and the people surrender their hopes, their ambitions and their human and civil rights to the whims of their elected representatives. Where all that we hold dear, all that we depend on for decency, fairness and security, depends on the honor, honesty and good faith of those elected. "Because once it is elected, we have no means of curbing, challenging or preventing anything a government may choose to do, whether or not that's lawful, just, rational or humane. "Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large. Our helplessness in the face of the state marching side by side with destitution and despair. "This is why liberation was born. Because the route to the Scotland we dream of neither can nor will come through the present political system, but through the restoration of the political, territorial and judicial rights, the constitutional provisions that belong to the people of this nation, in law and in justice, even under the terms of this fraudulent union, and certainly under international law. "They mean that we, the people, are sovereign, in fact, not in sound bite, the ultimate authority of this nation of Scotland. "They mean that the interests of the people, collectively known as the common good, are not only the primary purpose of government, but the only condition on which it's permitted to exist. "They mean that we are entitled to overrule, remove or replace a government that violates that condition of its existence, that fails to honour its promises, to consult the people or to act according to their wishes and welfare. "And in the modern world, that means the right to all the mechanisms that we see in a nation like Switzerland, which will make that sovereign power a reality. "All this is part of what we call decolonization, true Scottish self determination. And it is the soul and purpose of liberation Scotland. "Impossible? Other nations have trodden the path to decolonisation. Not one has bowed to the kidnapper and asked for permission. "We know now that we can gain our independence as a state by first gaining independence from a colonizing power. So that instead of waiting to reclaim real sovereignty of the people after independence, we gain our independence by first reclaiming our sovereign Scottish rights. "The next step on this road is establishing the committee of the Scottish Liberation Movement. This committee will be elected from the membership of Liberation and will operate under a ratified constitution. "And it will register Scotland's Liberation Movement with the United Nations." Sara Salyers @TheScotCongress Iain.lawson27 Salvo.Scot Colette Walker

ScotNews

20,333 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

To the women using their platforms to cry about ICE, You are not virtuous. Your vulnerability to be so easily manipulated by a political party's agenda that you do not understand is pathetic. It should be shamed and you should all be embarrassed. Where were the tears for the tens of thousands killed in Iran in recent weeks—protesters gunned down by their own regime simply for demanding basic human rights and the right not to starve? Where was the outrage for the thousands of American victims murdered by illegal immigrants who had no legal right to be in our country? Where was the grief for the children trafficked into sex slavery, enabled and exacerbated by open-border policies under the Biden administration? Where was the concern for the hundreds of thousands of women across Europe who have been raped at the hands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries? Where was the mourning for Charlie Kirk who was assassinated in cold blood for peacefully sitting down with a microphone and answering questions—not driving a car into an officer or actively seeking confrontation with one while armed? You have either stayed silent on the above or celebrated Charlie's murder. This is selective empathy at its most transparent—activated only when it fits Democratic narratives. It isn't principled compassion; it's performative politics. It doesn't deserve applause; it deserves scrutiny and shame. When your empathy is conditional on political alignment, you are morally bankrupt and inconsistent. If you are exercising your constitutional right to speak freely and critique the government on your platform, do so with a deeper gratitude for how and why you’re able to do that without being jailed or killed. Leftist women in America represent the height of privilege: loud, ungrateful, and utterly disconnected from the realities of true oppression around the world.
2:49

To the women using their platforms to cry about ICE, You are not virtuous. Your vulnerability to be so easily manipulated by a political party's agenda that you do not understand is pathetic. It should be shamed and you should all be embarrassed. Where were the tears for the tens of thousands killed in Iran in recent weeks—protesters gunned down by their own regime simply for demanding basic human rights and the right not to starve? Where was the outrage for the thousands of American victims murdered by illegal immigrants who had no legal right to be in our country? Where was the grief for the children trafficked into sex slavery, enabled and exacerbated by open-border policies under the Biden administration? Where was the concern for the hundreds of thousands of women across Europe who have been raped at the hands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries? Where was the mourning for Charlie Kirk who was assassinated in cold blood for peacefully sitting down with a microphone and answering questions—not driving a car into an officer or actively seeking confrontation with one while armed? You have either stayed silent on the above or celebrated Charlie's murder. This is selective empathy at its most transparent—activated only when it fits Democratic narratives. It isn't principled compassion; it's performative politics. It doesn't deserve applause; it deserves scrutiny and shame. When your empathy is conditional on political alignment, you are morally bankrupt and inconsistent. If you are exercising your constitutional right to speak freely and critique the government on your platform, do so with a deeper gratitude for how and why you’re able to do that without being jailed or killed. Leftist women in America represent the height of privilege: loud, ungrateful, and utterly disconnected from the realities of true oppression around the world.

Avery Daye

60,997 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

WHY RELIGION MUST BE EXPUNGED FROM THE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM The 8-4-4 education system in Kenya, introduced in 1985 under President Daniel arap Moi, was deliberately designed to produce docile, unquestioning citizens, mirroring the way colonial Christianity weaponized the Bible to condition Africans to accept oppression and revere a white master. Just as religious indoctrination targets children before they develop critical thinking, 8-4-4 was crafted to mold young minds into submissive subjects who internalize authority and suffering as a natural order. By emphasizing rote learning, heavy workloads, and punitive discipline, the system stifled curiosity and punished independent thought, ensuring students emerged as compliant workers rather than critical thinkers. This parallels the Bible’s use in colonial Africa, where stories of divine suffering and obedience were drilled into communities to justify colonial exploitation, discourage resistance, and elevate a white savior figure as unquestionable authority. In both systems, the mechanism is deliberate: target the young and vulnerable before they can reason critically. Under 8-4-4, children as young as six were burdened with excessive subjects and exams, leaving little room for abstract thinking or creativity, much like how biblical tales of eternal punishment or divine reward are introduced to preschoolers unable to analyze metaphors. By the time students reach cognitive maturity, questioning the system - whether educational or religious - is met with accusations of rebellion or moral failure, akin to being labeled “ungodly” for doubting religious dogma. This conditioning ensures compliance sticks, not because it’s rational, but because it’s been repeated relentlessly. If 8-4-4 or colonial Christianity were inherently true, they wouldn’t need to suppress inquiry or rely on early indoctrination; they could withstand adult scrutiny. Instead, both reveal a calculated design to program acceptance of oppression, quash dissent, and perpetuate systems of control, exposing their true purpose as tools of subjugation rather than enlightenment.
3:21

WHY RELIGION MUST BE EXPUNGED FROM THE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM The 8-4-4 education system in Kenya, introduced in 1985 under President Daniel arap Moi, was deliberately designed to produce docile, unquestioning citizens, mirroring the way colonial Christianity weaponized the Bible to condition Africans to accept oppression and revere a white master. Just as religious indoctrination targets children before they develop critical thinking, 8-4-4 was crafted to mold young minds into submissive subjects who internalize authority and suffering as a natural order. By emphasizing rote learning, heavy workloads, and punitive discipline, the system stifled curiosity and punished independent thought, ensuring students emerged as compliant workers rather than critical thinkers. This parallels the Bible’s use in colonial Africa, where stories of divine suffering and obedience were drilled into communities to justify colonial exploitation, discourage resistance, and elevate a white savior figure as unquestionable authority. In both systems, the mechanism is deliberate: target the young and vulnerable before they can reason critically. Under 8-4-4, children as young as six were burdened with excessive subjects and exams, leaving little room for abstract thinking or creativity, much like how biblical tales of eternal punishment or divine reward are introduced to preschoolers unable to analyze metaphors. By the time students reach cognitive maturity, questioning the system - whether educational or religious - is met with accusations of rebellion or moral failure, akin to being labeled “ungodly” for doubting religious dogma. This conditioning ensures compliance sticks, not because it’s rational, but because it’s been repeated relentlessly. If 8-4-4 or colonial Christianity were inherently true, they wouldn’t need to suppress inquiry or rely on early indoctrination; they could withstand adult scrutiny. Instead, both reveal a calculated design to program acceptance of oppression, quash dissent, and perpetuate systems of control, exposing their true purpose as tools of subjugation rather than enlightenment.

Francis Gaitho

12,235 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Good morning X! 😎☕️🫡 🔴South Africa pre-1994 vs South Africa post-1994. An inconvenient truth!! 🔴 "Unfortunately, South Africa is the clearest and most uncomfortable example of this collapse. For more than 30 years every failure in governance has been excused with the same answer – Apartheid. As if a system that ended decades ago can permanently absolve those in power from any responsibility? As if liberation from apartheid itself is governing strategy Before the end of apartheid, South Africa was not a perfect society – but it WAS A FUNCTIONING ONE. · It possessed advanced infrastructure; world-class universities and an industrial economy integrated into global markets. · IT DEVELOPED NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND voluntarily dismantled them. · The world's first successful heart transplant was performed there. These are not opinions – these historical facts!! Compare that to the present, a country that cannot reliably keep its lights on, municipalities no longer delivering water or sanitation and basic services. A police force overwhelmed by crime. Public education in collapse. Corruption so normalized it is discussed as an inevitability rather than scandal. Result of decades of misrule. And yet the ruling class continues to govern backward, endlessly invoking historical injustice to justify present failure. Apartheid has become a rhetorical shield – used not heal but silence criticism. Any attempt at demand competence is dismissed as nostalgia, any call for accountability framed as betrayal. At some point we have to be brutally honest – sovereignty is not sacred. It's justified only if it improves human welfare. When independence becomes a shield behind which political elite presides over decay, it loses its moral authority to govern. Self-rule that cannot govern is NOT self determination, but abandonment. This where the idea of recolonization becomes unavoidable." ~ Professor G
2:37

Good morning X! 😎☕️🫡 🔴South Africa pre-1994 vs South Africa post-1994. An inconvenient truth!! 🔴 "Unfortunately, South Africa is the clearest and most uncomfortable example of this collapse. For more than 30 years every failure in governance has been excused with the same answer – Apartheid. As if a system that ended decades ago can permanently absolve those in power from any responsibility? As if liberation from apartheid itself is governing strategy Before the end of apartheid, South Africa was not a perfect society – but it WAS A FUNCTIONING ONE. · It possessed advanced infrastructure; world-class universities and an industrial economy integrated into global markets. · IT DEVELOPED NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND voluntarily dismantled them. · The world's first successful heart transplant was performed there. These are not opinions – these historical facts!! Compare that to the present, a country that cannot reliably keep its lights on, municipalities no longer delivering water or sanitation and basic services. A police force overwhelmed by crime. Public education in collapse. Corruption so normalized it is discussed as an inevitability rather than scandal. Result of decades of misrule. And yet the ruling class continues to govern backward, endlessly invoking historical injustice to justify present failure. Apartheid has become a rhetorical shield – used not heal but silence criticism. Any attempt at demand competence is dismissed as nostalgia, any call for accountability framed as betrayal. At some point we have to be brutally honest – sovereignty is not sacred. It's justified only if it improves human welfare. When independence becomes a shield behind which political elite presides over decay, it loses its moral authority to govern. Self-rule that cannot govern is NOT self determination, but abandonment. This where the idea of recolonization becomes unavoidable." ~ Professor G

Lorraine 🇿🇦

17,803 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

President Joe Biden should be required, by law, to explicitly list every crime for which he intends to pardon his son, Hunter Biden. Anything less than full disclosure not only erodes public trust but also raises profound constitutional questions about the misuse of executive power. If the president issues a blanket pardon—granting his son immunity without clearly specifying the offenses—it could establish a dangerous precedent that undermines the rule of law. A blanket pardon of this nature is an affront to the Constitution. Legal scholars and historians alike agree: the Founding Fathers did not intend for the pardon power to serve as a get-out-of-jail-free card for the politically connected. The framers envisioned a government rooted in accountability and transparency, yet here we are, watching the very pillars of justice wobble under the weight of partisan abuse. If Hunter Biden were allowed to walk away from his legal troubles without the American public knowing the full extent of his wrongdoing, it would signal open season for corruption. Worse, it would grant Hunter Biden something no other U.S. citizen enjoys: absolute immunity from prosecution. Such a privilege flies in the face of the most basic principle of our justice system—"No one is above the law." Blanket immunity for any U.S. citizen is unconstitutional and ripe for legal challenge. The precedent it sets is chilling. Imagine if every president could pardon their family members or close allies in this way. It would create a two-tiered justice system: one for the elite, who can commit crimes without consequence, and another for everyone else. Hunter Biden’s alleged crimes range from tax evasion to foreign business dealings that raise serious national security concerns. These accusations deserve to be fully aired in a court of law. A blanket pardon not only denies justice to the American people but also prevents the truth from coming to light. What are the Bidens trying to hide? If the president believes Hunter’s actions are defensible, why not lay the facts on the table and let the legal system decide? The Biden administration often parrots the phrase, "No one is above the law." But this platitude rings hollow when applied selectively. If President Biden were to pardon his son without transparency, it would amount to a de facto admission that some individuals—those with the right last name—are indeed above the law. For justice to prevail, a Hunter Biden pardon must not be allowed to proceed in the shadows. Any crimes he is being pardoned for should be disclosed in full. Congress should demand oversight, and the courts should be prepared to challenge the constitutionality of such a broad and unprecedented abuse of power. This issue isn’t about partisan politics. It’s about preserving the integrity of our legal system and ensuring that the Constitution remains a document of accountability, not a shield for the powerful. If we fail to address this now, we risk losing the trust of the American people in their government. And once that trust is gone, it’s nearly impossible to restore.
0:26

President Joe Biden should be required, by law, to explicitly list every crime for which he intends to pardon his son, Hunter Biden. Anything less than full disclosure not only erodes public trust but also raises profound constitutional questions about the misuse of executive power. If the president issues a blanket pardon—granting his son immunity without clearly specifying the offenses—it could establish a dangerous precedent that undermines the rule of law. A blanket pardon of this nature is an affront to the Constitution. Legal scholars and historians alike agree: the Founding Fathers did not intend for the pardon power to serve as a get-out-of-jail-free card for the politically connected. The framers envisioned a government rooted in accountability and transparency, yet here we are, watching the very pillars of justice wobble under the weight of partisan abuse. If Hunter Biden were allowed to walk away from his legal troubles without the American public knowing the full extent of his wrongdoing, it would signal open season for corruption. Worse, it would grant Hunter Biden something no other U.S. citizen enjoys: absolute immunity from prosecution. Such a privilege flies in the face of the most basic principle of our justice system—"No one is above the law." Blanket immunity for any U.S. citizen is unconstitutional and ripe for legal challenge. The precedent it sets is chilling. Imagine if every president could pardon their family members or close allies in this way. It would create a two-tiered justice system: one for the elite, who can commit crimes without consequence, and another for everyone else. Hunter Biden’s alleged crimes range from tax evasion to foreign business dealings that raise serious national security concerns. These accusations deserve to be fully aired in a court of law. A blanket pardon not only denies justice to the American people but also prevents the truth from coming to light. What are the Bidens trying to hide? If the president believes Hunter’s actions are defensible, why not lay the facts on the table and let the legal system decide? The Biden administration often parrots the phrase, "No one is above the law." But this platitude rings hollow when applied selectively. If President Biden were to pardon his son without transparency, it would amount to a de facto admission that some individuals—those with the right last name—are indeed above the law. For justice to prevail, a Hunter Biden pardon must not be allowed to proceed in the shadows. Any crimes he is being pardoned for should be disclosed in full. Congress should demand oversight, and the courts should be prepared to challenge the constitutionality of such a broad and unprecedented abuse of power. This issue isn’t about partisan politics. It’s about preserving the integrity of our legal system and ensuring that the Constitution remains a document of accountability, not a shield for the powerful. If we fail to address this now, we risk losing the trust of the American people in their government. And once that trust is gone, it’s nearly impossible to restore.

Kyle Becker

77,129 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.
1:55

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.

Camus

103,492 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

China ordered its companies to ignore US sanctions on Iran. Rubio just told China that ignoring those sanctions will trigger secondary sanctions. Trump flies to Beijing in nine days. After China's Ministry of Commerce invoked its Blocking Statute ordering all Chinese entities not to comply with US sanctions on Iranian oil buyers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded publicly and without ambiguity: "If you ignore our sanctions, you're going to face secondary sanctions. And I don't have an announcement for you today, but we don't do these things for symbolic purposes." Secondary sanctions are not symbolic. They target anyone who does business with the already-sanctioned entities. Any Chinese bank, shipping company, or financial institution that processes transactions for the five sanctioned Chinese petrochemical companies risks being cut off from the US financial system entirely. For a country whose entire economic model depends on dollar-denominated global trade, that threat has real consequences. Rubio also made Beijing's own economic self-interest the argument. China is an export economy. Iran is currently threatening the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio put it plainly: "You can't buy from them if you can't ship it there." China is financing the military that is closing the waterway its own exports depend on. Beijing's Blocking Statute makes compliance with US sanctions illegal under Chinese law. Rubio just made non-compliance expensive under US law. Every Chinese company in this chain now has to choose which legal system it fears more. Trump sits down with Xi in Beijing on May 14. #China #CCP #Iran #Rubio #SecondarySanctions #Geopolitics #StraitOfHormuz #TrumpXi #Sanctions #OilTrade
1:03

China ordered its companies to ignore US sanctions on Iran. Rubio just told China that ignoring those sanctions will trigger secondary sanctions. Trump flies to Beijing in nine days. After China's Ministry of Commerce invoked its Blocking Statute ordering all Chinese entities not to comply with US sanctions on Iranian oil buyers, Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded publicly and without ambiguity: "If you ignore our sanctions, you're going to face secondary sanctions. And I don't have an announcement for you today, but we don't do these things for symbolic purposes." Secondary sanctions are not symbolic. They target anyone who does business with the already-sanctioned entities. Any Chinese bank, shipping company, or financial institution that processes transactions for the five sanctioned Chinese petrochemical companies risks being cut off from the US financial system entirely. For a country whose entire economic model depends on dollar-denominated global trade, that threat has real consequences. Rubio also made Beijing's own economic self-interest the argument. China is an export economy. Iran is currently threatening the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio put it plainly: "You can't buy from them if you can't ship it there." China is financing the military that is closing the waterway its own exports depend on. Beijing's Blocking Statute makes compliance with US sanctions illegal under Chinese law. Rubio just made non-compliance expensive under US law. Every Chinese company in this chain now has to choose which legal system it fears more. Trump sits down with Xi in Beijing on May 14. #China #CCP #Iran #Rubio #SecondarySanctions #Geopolitics #StraitOfHormuz #TrumpXi #Sanctions #OilTrade

UnveiledChina

71,522 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 What is the ruling on sexual harassment of children in Islam? Here is a video by a senior Muslim scholar, who explains: I recently wrote an article discussing the punishment for sexual abuse of children in Islam, especially given the unfortunate spread of this phenomenon [1]. Islam views very harshly the offender who exploits the weakness of the victim, whether it is a child, a woman, or a person with special needs; the abuser takes advantage of the victim’s inability to defend themselves or lack of awareness to commit the crime [1]. Children, in particular, do not understand what is happening, and they often look at adults—whether young or of their parents’ age—with trust, which is unfortunately exploited [1]. This abuse is sometimes carried out under the guise of “kindness” or “affection” to lure the child. Islam prescribes a specific punishment for such acts: a deterrent discretionary punishment (ta‘zir) that can reach execution by ta‘zir, in addition to the legal punishment for zina (adultery/fornication) [2]. Why execution? Because this crime is classified as a form of “Hirabah” [3]. Hirabah essentially involves acts that terrorize society and spread corruption. Sexual abuse of children is considered terrorizing society as a whole [3], [4]. This is based on the Quranic verse on Hirabah, which prescribes severe punishments for those who spread corruption on earth [4]. In fact, the Egyptian Dar al-Ifta has endorsed this legal and Shariah classification, considering rape (as well as drug trafficking) as Hirabah crimes warranting the death penalty due to the terror they cause to the public [4]. Regarding “consent,” this argument does not apply here; a child is inherently unaware. Even in cases of prostitution, where some might claim consent, Shariah enforces punishment to prevent societal corruption [5]. The role of the state is to implement deterrent punishments that prevent people from committing such crimes [2], [5]. Finally, it is important to understand that Islamic punishments and limits are applied without favoritism. As the Prophet ﷺ said: “Even if Fatimah, daughter of Muhammad, stole, her hand would be cut off” [6]. Once the case reaches the court and becomes known in society, the deterrent punishment must be applied without leniency [5], [6]. For more Shariah evidence and detailed discussion, you can refer to my published article on this topic [6].
2:14

🚨 What is the ruling on sexual harassment of children in Islam? Here is a video by a senior Muslim scholar, who explains: I recently wrote an article discussing the punishment for sexual abuse of children in Islam, especially given the unfortunate spread of this phenomenon [1]. Islam views very harshly the offender who exploits the weakness of the victim, whether it is a child, a woman, or a person with special needs; the abuser takes advantage of the victim’s inability to defend themselves or lack of awareness to commit the crime [1]. Children, in particular, do not understand what is happening, and they often look at adults—whether young or of their parents’ age—with trust, which is unfortunately exploited [1]. This abuse is sometimes carried out under the guise of “kindness” or “affection” to lure the child. Islam prescribes a specific punishment for such acts: a deterrent discretionary punishment (ta‘zir) that can reach execution by ta‘zir, in addition to the legal punishment for zina (adultery/fornication) [2]. Why execution? Because this crime is classified as a form of “Hirabah” [3]. Hirabah essentially involves acts that terrorize society and spread corruption. Sexual abuse of children is considered terrorizing society as a whole [3], [4]. This is based on the Quranic verse on Hirabah, which prescribes severe punishments for those who spread corruption on earth [4]. In fact, the Egyptian Dar al-Ifta has endorsed this legal and Shariah classification, considering rape (as well as drug trafficking) as Hirabah crimes warranting the death penalty due to the terror they cause to the public [4]. Regarding “consent,” this argument does not apply here; a child is inherently unaware. Even in cases of prostitution, where some might claim consent, Shariah enforces punishment to prevent societal corruption [5]. The role of the state is to implement deterrent punishments that prevent people from committing such crimes [2], [5]. Finally, it is important to understand that Islamic punishments and limits are applied without favoritism. As the Prophet ﷺ said: “Even if Fatimah, daughter of Muhammad, stole, her hand would be cut off” [6]. Once the case reaches the court and becomes known in society, the deterrent punishment must be applied without leniency [5], [6]. For more Shariah evidence and detailed discussion, you can refer to my published article on this topic [6].

The Middle East

216,101 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The rot within the United States Government has reached a severe level, so deeply embedded that no quick fix or surface-level “reform” can suffice. What we are facing is not simply inefficiency, incompetence, or political dysfunction; it is a corruption of the system itself. A network of self-preservation, deceit, and abuse of power has been allowed to metastasize within the very institutions entrusted to safeguard liberty. For years, the American people have been told to “trust the process.” But what happens when the process itself has been weaponized? What happens when those sworn to uphold the law bend it to serve their own interests? We are living in that moment. The Department of Justice, the intelligence community, and entrenched bureaucrats have not merely failed in their duty; they have turned their power against the people they are meant to serve. This is not a matter of politics. It is not a clash of left versus right. What unfolded was a deliberate effort to undermine a duly elected President of the United States, and by extension, to nullify the choice of the American people. Let us call it by its proper name: a coup. Those responsible continue to shield themselves from accountability, hiding behind the walls of legal privilege and the pretense of process. They manipulate procedures meant to ensure fairness and justice, twisting them into tools of delay, obfuscation, and protection for the guilty. They hope time will bury their crimes, the public’s memory will fade, and fatigue will silence the demand for truth. But history has taught us the danger of complacency. No Republic can survive when corruption at the top is allowed to harden into permanence. If unchecked, rot spreads until the foundation collapses entirely. Make no mistake: the foundation of this Republic is under siege. There are only two paths forward. One day, grandparents may sit with their grandchildren and recount this era as a dark chapter that America had the courage to confront when citizens rose, demanded accountability, and restored integrity to their government. Or, those same grandchildren may inherit a nation broken beyond recognition, forced as adults to fight for freedoms their forefathers surrendered by inaction. I choose the first path, but choosing it is not enough. Action is required. Accountability must be demanded. Every corrupt actor must be exposed. Every abuse of power must be met with consequence. Every decayed institution must be torn down to its foundations and rebuilt upon truth and transparency. Without accountability, every campaign promise, every policy debate, every speech about “reform” is meaningless. They are hollow gestures draped over a broken system. Until the cancer is cut out, the Republic cannot heal. This is not a call for vengeance. It is a call for survival. The American people already see what is happening. They know the system is failing. The question is not whether corruption exists but whether leaders will find the courage to confront it or shrink back and allow history to record them as cowards. This is the moment of decision. Either the rot is exposed and ripped out by deliberate effort, or the decay consumes what is left of our Constitutional Republic. The choice is ours.
2:47

The rot within the United States Government has reached a severe level, so deeply embedded that no quick fix or surface-level “reform” can suffice. What we are facing is not simply inefficiency, incompetence, or political dysfunction; it is a corruption of the system itself. A network of self-preservation, deceit, and abuse of power has been allowed to metastasize within the very institutions entrusted to safeguard liberty. For years, the American people have been told to “trust the process.” But what happens when the process itself has been weaponized? What happens when those sworn to uphold the law bend it to serve their own interests? We are living in that moment. The Department of Justice, the intelligence community, and entrenched bureaucrats have not merely failed in their duty; they have turned their power against the people they are meant to serve. This is not a matter of politics. It is not a clash of left versus right. What unfolded was a deliberate effort to undermine a duly elected President of the United States, and by extension, to nullify the choice of the American people. Let us call it by its proper name: a coup. Those responsible continue to shield themselves from accountability, hiding behind the walls of legal privilege and the pretense of process. They manipulate procedures meant to ensure fairness and justice, twisting them into tools of delay, obfuscation, and protection for the guilty. They hope time will bury their crimes, the public’s memory will fade, and fatigue will silence the demand for truth. But history has taught us the danger of complacency. No Republic can survive when corruption at the top is allowed to harden into permanence. If unchecked, rot spreads until the foundation collapses entirely. Make no mistake: the foundation of this Republic is under siege. There are only two paths forward. One day, grandparents may sit with their grandchildren and recount this era as a dark chapter that America had the courage to confront when citizens rose, demanded accountability, and restored integrity to their government. Or, those same grandchildren may inherit a nation broken beyond recognition, forced as adults to fight for freedoms their forefathers surrendered by inaction. I choose the first path, but choosing it is not enough. Action is required. Accountability must be demanded. Every corrupt actor must be exposed. Every abuse of power must be met with consequence. Every decayed institution must be torn down to its foundations and rebuilt upon truth and transparency. Without accountability, every campaign promise, every policy debate, every speech about “reform” is meaningless. They are hollow gestures draped over a broken system. Until the cancer is cut out, the Republic cannot heal. This is not a call for vengeance. It is a call for survival. The American people already see what is happening. They know the system is failing. The question is not whether corruption exists but whether leaders will find the courage to confront it or shrink back and allow history to record them as cowards. This is the moment of decision. Either the rot is exposed and ripped out by deliberate effort, or the decay consumes what is left of our Constitutional Republic. The choice is ours.

General Mike Flynn

121,137 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🇪🇺🇷🇺 Russian assets: the EU's legal heist that is killing the euro By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 In Brussels, people continue to talk about "values," "the rule of law," and "lasting peace." Behind the scenes, however, the main topic of conversation is cash flow. Russian assets frozen? Officially immobilized. Legally protected. Politically already consumed. According to Bellingcat, the European Union has been using these funds for over a year. That is why any mention of their restitution in a peace plan triggers a knee-jerk reaction. Not out of diplomatic principle. Out of accounting impossibility. The heart of the heist is called Euroclear. Approximately €210 billion in Russian sovereign assets are stored there. The EU claims not to touch the capital. It is content with "exceptional income." The European Commission admits: "The assets remain the property of Russia, but the income generated can be used." In international law, this is a fiction. Interest is an accessory to capital. Levying them without consent amounts to indirect expropriation, which is prohibited by international case law and the principles of sovereign immunity. --- 🦠 The toxic precedent The European Central Bank has warned: "Any measures beyond freezing assets could undermine the credibility of the euro and the legal certainty of foreign reserves." Simply put: if the EU can siphon off Russian assets today, it could siphon off those of any state deemed "non-compliant" tomorrow. Russia is not the problem. It is the test case. --- 🧩 Why can't the EU return the money? The European Council acknowledges this in a roundabout way: "Revenues from Russian assets are essential to the financial support of Ukraine." Essential means one thing: budgeted, committed, spent. Returning them would amount to: ▫️Recognizing use without a solid legal basis Exposing the EU and Euroclear to massive international arbitration ▫️Causing a shockwave in global confidence in the euro The law then becomes a luxury. War, a cover. --- 💶 The euro, a conditional currency The message sent to the world is clear: holding reserves in Europe means accepting direct political risk. Today it's Russia. Tomorrow, China? A Gulf country? A partner that has become troublesome? The predictable result: ▫️Accelerated diversification away from the euro ▫️Rise in bilateral settlements outside the European system ▫️Silent decline of the euro as a reserve currency No press release. Just central banks moving their pieces. --- ☮️ Why has peace become dangerous? A return of Russian assets would signify: ▫️An admission of legal robbery ▫️The loss of credibility of the euro ▫️The collapse of the European moral narrative So the EU refuses. Not because peace is unjust, but because it is financially deadly. The European Union did not reject the return of Russian assets on ideological grounds. It rejected it because you don't give back money that has already been laundered. And a currency that thrives on this kind of scheme always ends up the same way: abandoned, slowly, quietly... until the last shot is fired.
1:22

🇪🇺🇷🇺 Russian assets: the EU's legal heist that is killing the euro By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 In Brussels, people continue to talk about "values," "the rule of law," and "lasting peace." Behind the scenes, however, the main topic of conversation is cash flow. Russian assets frozen? Officially immobilized. Legally protected. Politically already consumed. According to Bellingcat, the European Union has been using these funds for over a year. That is why any mention of their restitution in a peace plan triggers a knee-jerk reaction. Not out of diplomatic principle. Out of accounting impossibility. The heart of the heist is called Euroclear. Approximately €210 billion in Russian sovereign assets are stored there. The EU claims not to touch the capital. It is content with "exceptional income." The European Commission admits: "The assets remain the property of Russia, but the income generated can be used." In international law, this is a fiction. Interest is an accessory to capital. Levying them without consent amounts to indirect expropriation, which is prohibited by international case law and the principles of sovereign immunity. --- 🦠 The toxic precedent The European Central Bank has warned: "Any measures beyond freezing assets could undermine the credibility of the euro and the legal certainty of foreign reserves." Simply put: if the EU can siphon off Russian assets today, it could siphon off those of any state deemed "non-compliant" tomorrow. Russia is not the problem. It is the test case. --- 🧩 Why can't the EU return the money? The European Council acknowledges this in a roundabout way: "Revenues from Russian assets are essential to the financial support of Ukraine." Essential means one thing: budgeted, committed, spent. Returning them would amount to: ▫️Recognizing use without a solid legal basis Exposing the EU and Euroclear to massive international arbitration ▫️Causing a shockwave in global confidence in the euro The law then becomes a luxury. War, a cover. --- 💶 The euro, a conditional currency The message sent to the world is clear: holding reserves in Europe means accepting direct political risk. Today it's Russia. Tomorrow, China? A Gulf country? A partner that has become troublesome? The predictable result: ▫️Accelerated diversification away from the euro ▫️Rise in bilateral settlements outside the European system ▫️Silent decline of the euro as a reserve currency No press release. Just central banks moving their pieces. --- ☮️ Why has peace become dangerous? A return of Russian assets would signify: ▫️An admission of legal robbery ▫️The loss of credibility of the euro ▫️The collapse of the European moral narrative So the EU refuses. Not because peace is unjust, but because it is financially deadly. The European Union did not reject the return of Russian assets on ideological grounds. It rejected it because you don't give back money that has already been laundered. And a currency that thrives on this kind of scheme always ends up the same way: abandoned, slowly, quietly... until the last shot is fired.

Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆

23,351 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce