正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

A sharp mind can solve problems. But pointed in the wrong direction, it can also invent a thousand reasons to be afraid. וְיוֹסִיף דַּעַת יוֹסִיף מַכְאוֹב More knowledge can mean more pain when every possibility becomes another reason not to move. Growth is not seeing no danger. It is... show more

Rabbi Shalom Landau

31,270 subscribers

12,174 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 条评论

NateLF 的头像

NateLF7 天前

Thank you for making these Rabbi. They are wonderful, well presented, insightful and valuable.

♱ Vicar Øf Christ ♱Fire-Breathing♱Dragon-Master♱ 的头像

♱ Vicar Øf Christ ♱Fire-Breathing♱Dragon-Master♱7 天前

More knowledge more pain but more opportunities as well it’s a trade off that’s worth it

Josh Young 的头像

Josh Young7 天前

Growth is not seeing no danger. It is seeing the danger and still believing there is a way forward. ✅ 🦬

SoCalPatriot56 的头像

SoCalPatriot567 天前

-Amen

Giedrius Trump 的头像

Giedrius Trump7 天前

True!

♠️ 的头像

♠️7 天前

Beautiful wisdom

Marianismo ♱ 的头像

Marianismo ♱7 天前

Inspiring, thank you Rabbi Shalom

⚜Futur Vice-roi de Québec⚜ 的头像

⚜Futur Vice-roi de Québec⚜7 天前

Taka, @SolJakey has a very similar philosophy. Overthinkers always find excuses to be negative, to put things off, to never try and so they never grow, never learn. Jake holds that you learn by doing and you only fail if you give up.

HalasHamasNow 🇺🇸 🤝 🇮🇱 🎗️ 的头像

HalasHamasNow 🇺🇸 🤝 🇮🇱 🎗️7 天前

I liked you up to the point when you hosted a antisemite mamadani in your sukkah and would like to know if you are open to a conversation about this Because the more I think about it I just can’t understand how come?!

Salomon Chadrel🇮🇱✡️ 的头像

Salomon Chadrel🇮🇱✡️7 天前

Thank you for your words.

Kerrin Naude 的头像

Kerrin Naude7 天前

Good messge. 🙏

Emma Doell 😏✨️ 的头像

Emma Doell 😏✨️7 天前

👏😏

相关视频

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 次观看 • 4 个月前

Yuval Noah Harari on the danger of AI agents: AI "can take power away from us ... It is already able not just to invent things, it is also able to manipulate people."

Yuval Noah Harari on the danger of AI agents: AI "can take power away from us ... It is already able not just to invent things, it is also able to manipulate people."

ControlAI

6,076,426 次观看 • 2 年前

Bitcoin’s volatility is a feature, not a bug — and it can be harnessed to move civilization forward.

Bitcoin’s volatility is a feature, not a bug — and it can be harnessed to move civilization forward.

Michael Saylor

491,890 次观看 • 10 个月前

Max Tegmark says the way through the AI black box may be to deploy its outputs instead. A cat can learn, but it cannot export what it learned. A human scientist can. As intelligence rises, more knowledge may become externalized into code and proofs. Deploy what the mind can verify, not the mind itself.

Max Tegmark says the way through the AI black box may be to deploy its outputs instead. A cat can learn, but it cannot export what it learned. A human scientist can. As intelligence rises, more knowledge may become externalized into code and proofs. Deploy what the mind can verify, not the mind itself.

vitrupo

49,717 次观看 • 5 个月前

“in my mind, the only thing i can say is, the reason he still wears the ring is because it is a recent loss, within a year or two, he’s still not quite ready to take it off.”

“in my mind, the only thing i can say is, the reason he still wears the ring is because it is a recent loss, within a year or two, he’s still not quite ready to take it off.”

club hatosy

178,733 次观看 • 6 个月前

“The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful than a thousand heads bowing in prayer.” Day after day, #Sebaashray2 proves that kindness is not a ritual, not a performance, not a staged promise, it is a force that walks straight into the lives of the people. You can hear it in the steady hum of service that refuses to pause, even for a moment. Sebaashray is not just an initiative, it is a reminder that governance can have a heartbeat. That care can be limitless. That compassion can be organised, disciplined, and unshakeable. Wherever it reaches, it leaves behind a simple truth: dignity is not charity, and service is not sympathy. It is responsibility. It is duty. And it is the moral compass that guides this mission every single day. In each lane, under every tent, across every queue, Sebaashray embodies what true public service must look like: quiet, constant, and deeply human.

“The simplest acts of kindness are by far more powerful than a thousand heads bowing in prayer.” Day after day, #Sebaashray2 proves that kindness is not a ritual, not a performance, not a staged promise, it is a force that walks straight into the lives of the people. You can hear it in the steady hum of service that refuses to pause, even for a moment. Sebaashray is not just an initiative, it is a reminder that governance can have a heartbeat. That care can be limitless. That compassion can be organised, disciplined, and unshakeable. Wherever it reaches, it leaves behind a simple truth: dignity is not charity, and service is not sympathy. It is responsibility. It is duty. And it is the moral compass that guides this mission every single day. In each lane, under every tent, across every queue, Sebaashray embodies what true public service must look like: quiet, constant, and deeply human.

Abhishek Banerjee

253,707 次观看 • 10 个月前

Carney: Canada can’t solve all the world’s problems, but we can show that another way is possible. That the arc of history isn’t destined to be warped towards authoritarianism and exclusion; it can still bend towards progress and justice.

Carney: Canada can’t solve all the world’s problems, but we can show that another way is possible. That the arc of history isn’t destined to be warped towards authoritarianism and exclusion; it can still bend towards progress and justice.

Clash Report

20,366 次观看 • 9 个月前

There is a very small action in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that I find increasingly unsettling the more closely I look at it: when Saruman reveals the Palantír, Gandalf immediately pulls the cloth back over it. One man wants to look. The other wants to cover up the very thing that allows him to see more. Why? If the Palantír is a tool that allows someone to see across great distances, shouldn't a wise person want to know as much as possible? And yet this scene suggests a paradox: sometimes the danger does not lie in knowing too little, but in becoming too convinced that what we know is enough to draw a conclusion. Saruman is the clearest example of this. When he shows the Palantír to Gandalf, Saruman says: “I have seen it.” The sentence sounds like a declaration of knowledge. I have seen it. I know what is happening. I understand Sauron’s power. But that is precisely the problem: seeing one thing is not the same as seeing the whole truth. The Palantír gives Saruman a wider field of vision, but a wider field of vision does not necessarily mean a complete perspective. Saruman can see Sauron’s rising power, the scale of the threat, and things an ordinary person could never see. But he cannot see everything that will ultimately determine the outcome of the war. He does not see Frodo. He does not know how far a small Hobbit can go. He does not know how loyalty, friendship, sacrifice, and seemingly insignificant choices will shape the course of history. In other words, Saruman has more information, but that does not mean he possesses the whole truth. And this is where the Palantír becomes such an interesting image of the trap of knowledge. Because information does not draw conclusions by itself. Human beings do. Saruman sees that Sauron is powerful. From that, he reasons that Sauron will win. Then, from “will win,” he arrives at “cannot be resisted.” And finally: “We must join with him.” Notice the word “must.” Saruman does not say, “I want to stand with Sauron.” He says, “We must.” A personal choice is transformed into an inevitability imposed by reality itself. That is Saruman’s real tragedy. He does not need to stop thinking in order to become corrupted. On the contrary, he continues to reason. He continues to analyze. He continues to speak in the language of rationality. He even calls his choice wisdom: “It would be wise, my friend.” And this is where intelligence begins to become a trap. Saruman has constructed a chain of reasoning in which every path leads to the same conclusion: Sauron is too powerful, therefore resisting him is futile; if resistance is futile, then cooperation is the practical choice; and if that is the practical choice, then surrender can be called wisdom. He is no longer using reason to search for the truth. He is using reason to protect a conclusion he has already accepted. That is a particularly dangerous form of self-justification: when a person begins to call what they fear something they “must” do, and then calls their surrender “reason.” And this is why Gandalf’s reaction to the Palantír is so significant. He does not argue with Saruman that knowledge is bad. He simply says: “A Palantír is a dangerous tool.” Then he covers it. Gandalf understands something Saruman has forgotten: being wise does not mean always wanting to see more. It means knowing the limits of your own understanding. There are things we need to know. But there are also things we need to recognize that we cannot fully control in the way they affect us. Gandalf does not cover the Palantír because he is afraid of the truth. He covers it because he understands that not everything we can see should be looked at in whatever way we choose. Especially because Gandalf also says: “We do not know who else may be watching.” That line completely changes the meaning of the orb. The Palantír is not merely a window through which we can look out at the world. It is also a window through which someone else can look back at us. Saruman thinks he is using the tool to observe Sauron. But eventually, Saruman himself becomes trapped in a relationship he no longer controls. This is the paradox of power: we think we are holding the tool, until we realize that the tool has begun to shape the way we see the world. And from here, the two Wizards stand before the same problem but respond to it in completely different ways. Saruman looks at Sauron’s power and concludes: We cannot win. Gandalf looks at the same thing but refuses to accept that conclusion. Not because Gandalf knows for certain that they will win. But because he understands that no one has the right to turn a possibility into a destiny simply because they cannot yet see a way out. That is why Gandalf’s question cuts so deeply: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason for madness?” Gandalf does not ask: “When did you become evil?” He asks: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason?” Because Saruman’s fall begins with the very thing that once made him powerful: his intelligence. Intelligence itself is not the problem. The problem begins at the moment a person believes their intelligence has become great enough that they no longer need to question themselves. And perhaps that is what makes the Palantír such an intriguing symbol. It is an orb designed to see far into the distance. Yet the farther Saruman sees, the narrower his world becomes. He sees Sauron and no longer sees the possibility of resisting Sauron. He sees power and no longer sees courage. He sees war and no longer sees the small people who might change its outcome. Gandalf, meanwhile, sees less, but leaves room for more possibilities. And perhaps this is the deepest difference between the two. Saruman wants a complete view of the world so that he can be certain about the future. Gandalf accepts that the future cannot be seen in its entirety. One seeks certainty. The other accepts the limits of knowledge. And in Tolkien’s world, it is the second person who remains free. Because sometimes the most dangerous thing is not that we do not know enough. It is that we know a little, reason a great deal, and then begin to believe that our conclusion is the whole truth. Saruman is not defeated by the Palantír simply because he looks into it. He is defeated by what happens afterward: he allows what he sees to become the limit of what he can imagine. And Gandalf, through an action so small that it could almost be overlooked, simply pulls the cloth back over the Palantír. As if reminding us: Wisdom does not always mean seeing more. Sometimes wisdom means recognizing that the very way we see can deceive us.

There is a very small action in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that I find increasingly unsettling the more closely I look at it: when Saruman reveals the Palantír, Gandalf immediately pulls the cloth back over it. One man wants to look. The other wants to cover up the very thing that allows him to see more. Why? If the Palantír is a tool that allows someone to see across great distances, shouldn't a wise person want to know as much as possible? And yet this scene suggests a paradox: sometimes the danger does not lie in knowing too little, but in becoming too convinced that what we know is enough to draw a conclusion. Saruman is the clearest example of this. When he shows the Palantír to Gandalf, Saruman says: “I have seen it.” The sentence sounds like a declaration of knowledge. I have seen it. I know what is happening. I understand Sauron’s power. But that is precisely the problem: seeing one thing is not the same as seeing the whole truth. The Palantír gives Saruman a wider field of vision, but a wider field of vision does not necessarily mean a complete perspective. Saruman can see Sauron’s rising power, the scale of the threat, and things an ordinary person could never see. But he cannot see everything that will ultimately determine the outcome of the war. He does not see Frodo. He does not know how far a small Hobbit can go. He does not know how loyalty, friendship, sacrifice, and seemingly insignificant choices will shape the course of history. In other words, Saruman has more information, but that does not mean he possesses the whole truth. And this is where the Palantír becomes such an interesting image of the trap of knowledge. Because information does not draw conclusions by itself. Human beings do. Saruman sees that Sauron is powerful. From that, he reasons that Sauron will win. Then, from “will win,” he arrives at “cannot be resisted.” And finally: “We must join with him.” Notice the word “must.” Saruman does not say, “I want to stand with Sauron.” He says, “We must.” A personal choice is transformed into an inevitability imposed by reality itself. That is Saruman’s real tragedy. He does not need to stop thinking in order to become corrupted. On the contrary, he continues to reason. He continues to analyze. He continues to speak in the language of rationality. He even calls his choice wisdom: “It would be wise, my friend.” And this is where intelligence begins to become a trap. Saruman has constructed a chain of reasoning in which every path leads to the same conclusion: Sauron is too powerful, therefore resisting him is futile; if resistance is futile, then cooperation is the practical choice; and if that is the practical choice, then surrender can be called wisdom. He is no longer using reason to search for the truth. He is using reason to protect a conclusion he has already accepted. That is a particularly dangerous form of self-justification: when a person begins to call what they fear something they “must” do, and then calls their surrender “reason.” And this is why Gandalf’s reaction to the Palantír is so significant. He does not argue with Saruman that knowledge is bad. He simply says: “A Palantír is a dangerous tool.” Then he covers it. Gandalf understands something Saruman has forgotten: being wise does not mean always wanting to see more. It means knowing the limits of your own understanding. There are things we need to know. But there are also things we need to recognize that we cannot fully control in the way they affect us. Gandalf does not cover the Palantír because he is afraid of the truth. He covers it because he understands that not everything we can see should be looked at in whatever way we choose. Especially because Gandalf also says: “We do not know who else may be watching.” That line completely changes the meaning of the orb. The Palantír is not merely a window through which we can look out at the world. It is also a window through which someone else can look back at us. Saruman thinks he is using the tool to observe Sauron. But eventually, Saruman himself becomes trapped in a relationship he no longer controls. This is the paradox of power: we think we are holding the tool, until we realize that the tool has begun to shape the way we see the world. And from here, the two Wizards stand before the same problem but respond to it in completely different ways. Saruman looks at Sauron’s power and concludes: We cannot win. Gandalf looks at the same thing but refuses to accept that conclusion. Not because Gandalf knows for certain that they will win. But because he understands that no one has the right to turn a possibility into a destiny simply because they cannot yet see a way out. That is why Gandalf’s question cuts so deeply: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason for madness?” Gandalf does not ask: “When did you become evil?” He asks: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason?” Because Saruman’s fall begins with the very thing that once made him powerful: his intelligence. Intelligence itself is not the problem. The problem begins at the moment a person believes their intelligence has become great enough that they no longer need to question themselves. And perhaps that is what makes the Palantír such an intriguing symbol. It is an orb designed to see far into the distance. Yet the farther Saruman sees, the narrower his world becomes. He sees Sauron and no longer sees the possibility of resisting Sauron. He sees power and no longer sees courage. He sees war and no longer sees the small people who might change its outcome. Gandalf, meanwhile, sees less, but leaves room for more possibilities. And perhaps this is the deepest difference between the two. Saruman wants a complete view of the world so that he can be certain about the future. Gandalf accepts that the future cannot be seen in its entirety. One seeks certainty. The other accepts the limits of knowledge. And in Tolkien’s world, it is the second person who remains free. Because sometimes the most dangerous thing is not that we do not know enough. It is that we know a little, reason a great deal, and then begin to believe that our conclusion is the whole truth. Saruman is not defeated by the Palantír simply because he looks into it. He is defeated by what happens afterward: he allows what he sees to become the limit of what he can imagine. And Gandalf, through an action so small that it could almost be overlooked, simply pulls the cloth back over the Palantír. As if reminding us: Wisdom does not always mean seeing more. Sometimes wisdom means recognizing that the very way we see can deceive us.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

15,487 次观看 • 2 个月前

Firing a warning shot is legally and tactically a gamble. If someone is in enough danger to pull the trigger, the round better be intended to stop the threat, not just scare it. Compassion under fire can change everything.

Firing a warning shot is legally and tactically a gamble. If someone is in enough danger to pull the trigger, the round better be intended to stop the threat, not just scare it. Compassion under fire can change everything.

Colion Noir

52,351 次观看 • 1 年前

A picture now is worth more than a thousand words in genAI; it can be turned into a full 3D world! And you can stroll in this garden endlessly long, it will still be there.

A picture now is worth more than a thousand words in genAI; it can be turned into a full 3D world! And you can stroll in this garden endlessly long, it will still be there.

Fei-Fei Li

261,514 次观看 • 1 年前

"The greatest skill you can build is learning how to keep going when there is a hundred reasons not to"

"The greatest skill you can build is learning how to keep going when there is a hundred reasons not to"

le.hl

21,612 次观看 • 2 个月前

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

Brian Kight

125,742 次观看 • 3 年前

JONNY BONES JUST GAVE ME ANOTHER REASON TO LOOK INTO 1WIN VIP CLUB Watching Jonny Meat hang out with 1win VIP players in Shanghai showed another side of what the VIP Club can be like. The bonuses are only one side of it. VIP members can also get access to: ➫ A dedicated personal VIP manager ➫ Tailored bonuses and offers ➫ Concierge support ➫ Private tournaments ➫ Exclusive events and experiences That is what interests me more about the VIP Club. It is not only about getting another reward while playing. There is also a more personal side to the membership, and seeing VIP players spend the weekend together in Shanghai shows that clearly. So if you already use regularly and have been curious about what comes with VIP membership, it is worth taking a closer look. Explore more here 👇

JONNY BONES JUST GAVE ME ANOTHER REASON TO LOOK INTO 1WIN VIP CLUB Watching Jonny Meat hang out with 1win VIP players in Shanghai showed another side of what the VIP Club can be like. The bonuses are only one side of it. VIP members can also get access to: ➫ A dedicated personal VIP manager ➫ Tailored bonuses and offers ➫ Concierge support ➫ Private tournaments ➫ Exclusive events and experiences That is what interests me more about the VIP Club. It is not only about getting another reward while playing. There is also a more personal side to the membership, and seeing VIP players spend the weekend together in Shanghai shows that clearly. So if you already use regularly and have been curious about what comes with VIP membership, it is worth taking a closer look. Explore more here 👇

DeFi Gateway 🥷

11,393 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk: "There will not be any meaningful elections in the future All of America will be 'Californicated' and not in a good way It will actually be worse than California The one thing that holds California back from being even worse than it is, is that people can move out of California and still be in America What happens when there’s no place to move? It’ll be way worse than California"

Elon Musk: "There will not be any meaningful elections in the future All of America will be 'Californicated' and not in a good way It will actually be worse than California The one thing that holds California back from being even worse than it is, is that people can move out of California and still be in America What happens when there’s no place to move? It’ll be way worse than California"

X Freeze

575,650 次观看 • 9 个月前

You can look to the Left, And look to the Right, But you will live in danger tonight. When the enemy comes, He will never be heard, He'll blow your mind, And not say a word.

You can look to the Left, And look to the Right, But you will live in danger tonight. When the enemy comes, He will never be heard, He'll blow your mind, And not say a word.

RazörFist

18,080 次观看 • 8 个月前

It is such a beautiful time to be proud to be Rwandan. Seeing Rwandans especially young people not protesting but rallying behind president Paul Kagame with so much enthusiasm is evidence that FPR-Inkotanyi and president Kagame represent what most Rwandans need, the knowledge that the country is in safe hands and the can build their lives. History has impacted our perception about democracy and governance and as a sovereign state , we can not afford to be on the wrong side of history. We are campaigning for stability and continuity of Rwandas growth.#PK2024 campaigns. #thisisjolly🦅

It is such a beautiful time to be proud to be Rwandan. Seeing Rwandans especially young people not protesting but rallying behind president Paul Kagame with so much enthusiasm is evidence that FPR-Inkotanyi and president Kagame represent what most Rwandans need, the knowledge that the country is in safe hands and the can build their lives. History has impacted our perception about democracy and governance and as a sovereign state , we can not afford to be on the wrong side of history. We are campaigning for stability and continuity of Rwandas growth.#PK2024 campaigns. #thisisjolly🦅

Jolly Mutesi. #TeamPK

51,801 次观看 • 2 年前

Carney: "In a time of rising populism and ethnic nationalism, Canada can show how diversity is a strength... Canada can't solve all the world's problems. But we can show that another way is possible. That the arc of history isn't destined to be warped toward authoritarianism".

Carney: "In a time of rising populism and ethnic nationalism, Canada can show how diversity is a strength... Canada can't solve all the world's problems. But we can show that another way is possible. That the arc of history isn't destined to be warped toward authoritarianism".

Adam Schwarz

116,637 次观看 • 9 个月前