A small bit of weekend meta-analysis on trial reporting, #SAFEMOON, U.S. vs. Karony, and bias. Follow @protos for continuing updates.

reporting on some things, and then not reporting on others, shows bias, in your reporting and your professionalism as a journalist. You are saying you have built a "fact based conclusion" but you do not have the facts yet.... There WILL BE NO facts until..... The courts decide what is truth. Even then, it's based on a whole range of uncertainty like people's pasts, experiences, morality within themselves, what they believe to be right or wrong, and also what they believe to be legal or illegal in the space. What information has been barred from court, vice versa with both the prosecution and defense. Have you somehow teleported into the future @davidzmorris and have seen the court ruling ? For the "facts"? For as of right now there is ONLY presentations of allegations and also from the defense. Evidence from both sides, with nothing pertaining to the English use of the word "fact". To think you have this all worked out, to conclude you have "facts" before the end of trial. Is ropeable. That is why we are saying you have turned bias. Also Choosing what you report and what you DONT is also even worse then at least reporting everything but maybe typing it in a way that supports either side. At least you would of been unbiased with your reporting.... To be "reporting on the prosecution" but being silent for the x examination.... Do you understand that ? Again prove us wrong, upload the videos of the x examination. Nov was there too.... Let's hear your unbiased view of the x examination please..... - With a timestamp that you haven't just recorded it after the fact, please. Video really should be dated before the 12th May. Or you will say whatever you want to say to try prove a point. - and if you can't. It just shows you didn't even plan to report on the x examination....if you don't have ONE video dated before we all started calling you out ? Let's see it. You do not know everything yet, you have not heard any outcomes, you cannot see the future that the prosecution has been factual and/or won the case. Stop saying you have facts. That is being biased. Court of law is still in motion and nothing has been determined by the courts SO YOU saying something is fact already is bias. You have chosen to believe what YOU think is fact, and has not been ruled fact by a judge in the court of law yet. It's not a hero syndrome, it's a fight for justice syndrome. Look up "false imprisonment data u.s.a", statistically 1/20 people in jail are innocent.... Some of us paid attention to the announcements. Some of us have been fine with everything. I've said all along could go either way. BUT the man deserves his time in court like ANY OTHER human being out there and is the PINNACLE of purpose of the justice system. To say you have facts is negligence.

@Protos I’ve been banging on about these idiots and their Stockholm syndrome for years to little effect and you just knocked it out of the park in 3 minutes. I’m ashamed of myself.

@Protos I appreciate it! I have the slight advantage that I've dealt with many, many varieties of cultist at this point.

@Protos It's still biased reporting. Reporting on Intel that u "like" and not reporting on Intel that goes against your narrative (i.e "I have the facts and Karony is guilty thinking") is biased. It's meant to shift or influence the public opinion on the case, which can impact the trial.

@Protos Explain to me why I'm motivated to shift public opinion one way or another. I have zero connection to this case or anyone involved in it. And I get paid regardless of the outcome. Guide me through your mind palace.

@Protos David. Bias is saying you have already seen the “facts”🤦‍♂️ and have what you believe is the outcome of trial then writing articles that push your opinion instead of just what happens at trial that day. Don’t go on some, I am smarter than you rant bc you read a book.🤦‍♂️

@Protos So you've seen none of the trial proceedings, and have built your identity around SafeMoon, so your conclusions are unbiased. While my conclusions, drawn from the facts I've seen so far and frequently emphasizing good points by the defense, are biased. Truly fascinating.

@Protos Innocent until proven guilty. Why didn’t you show up for the cross examination? If you’re going to do something do it right. 🤦‍♂️

@Protos Imagine being such a maxxi that you trash this reporter, but believe a dude in a bat suit.

@Protos Thanks for the update, fantastic breakdown on bias vs opinion also.